politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » On the betting markets punters now make it a 40% chance that t

Betfair exchange prices on betdata.io chart
0
This discussion has been closed.
Betfair exchange prices on betdata.io chart
Comments
https://twitter.com/Andrew_ComRes/status/1184938398328541185?s=20
Supposing that I had been moved to write something that I might want to submit for consideration for publication as a thread header on this blog - where would I send it to?
35% chance of a GE this year
Even money Brexit before GE on Betfair
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2019/oct/17/rival-unionists-accuse-dup-of-catastrophic-brexit-miscalculation
60% WONT BACK JOHNSONS BREXIT SAYS POLL
[snigger]
If he does beat Warren and win Iowa - and I think it's 50/50 - then he is a genuinely top tier candidate, whatever the California polls say.
Silly argument 54/45 is sensible
If you message him on Twitter he will give you his email.
You keep take back control alive by keeping it this mystical thing out there, like the day after a happy sexy dream, like believing in Santa or being in love.
But the idiots have brought it down to reality. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
So not, in this case, includes DKs
(And before anyone says anything, I am sure there were equally stupid Remain voters.)
Edit: thinking about it this guy was a stupid 'Remain' voter.
What is interesting, that despite claims nobody has attention span / time, Popualrity of podcasts are showing a resurgence in long form interviews.
Then all the non-voters could have been added to the "not bothered" side!
Hashtag kickoutLabBoJoarselickers
*LD member who does canvassing etc.
I do not watch that either
Tory supporting Lab MPs are at high risk of deselection.
my personal contempt for any Labour MP that votes for this deal would be unrivalled-
We are all tories if we don't support st Jezbollah in all things.
Following my policy on betting transparency, please be advised that I have today staked £250 with PaddyPower on "No Deal in 2019" at 4/1. #BigBoyPants
This is an insurance bet: it is not intended to win (I hope it doesn't!), it is intended to compensate for the outcome.
As you know, I wish to preserve my wealth (it's very small, don't worry) against a currency crash. My method is to open up non-sterling currency accounts and move money into it, but that proved problematic (transfer costs, online banking failures, sterling has risen). Since an insurance policy shouldn't need an insurance policy of its own, I started to look for alternatives. This is one of them.
A £250 bet at 4/1 wins £1000. If the currency crashes 20%, then £5000 is only worth £4000: a loss of £1000. So we can see that the £250 bet at 4/1 preserves the value of the £5000. No muss, no fuss, and the losses are capped at £250 instead of £1000.
Thank you to all who took part in the discussion last night about which bet was the best for this.
This ward has historically been Labour.
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1184945487578910741?s=19
But if this deal, like Theresa May's deal agreed with EU leaders, fails to get through the House of Commons, and if there were a request from the UK for another Brexit extension, then these EU leaders, after three years of Brexit process - two Brexit deals - are not going to turn around and say no to the UK if this extension would be for a general election, a second referendum or a referendum on this deal.
https://www.bbc.com/news/live/uk-politics-50079596
As if MPs need any encouragement to play silly buggers, but looks like they will read this as smoke signals to do so.