Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Another set of opening PM Johnson leader ratings has him in de

1356

Comments

  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,043
    edited August 2019

    It's 48 to 52pc when don't knows are included.

    The Union is in danger. Let's fight for it the best way we know how-

    #Carling4Tennents4indyref2
    No it is 46% to 43% when don't knows are included, it is 52% to 48% excluding Don't Knows
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    Well, that was predictable.....

    https://twitter.com/Andrew_Adonis/status/1159129003233611777?s=20

    Alternative version 'UK Train Operators rejected European imposition of rules' (I still think its a pity, but its a commercial decision by those involved)
  • eekeek Posts: 29,735
    FF43 said:

    To be sure that's why Johnson's policy is to make the Conservative Party into a not so pale shadow of the Brexit Party. Problem is, he's now at the mercy of Farage who is quite happy to destroy Johnson just as Johnson wants to destroy him.
    Plus the more the Tories move towards Nigel the more Tory voters from the centre will move towards the Lib Dems.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,043

    "If you don't want to live on a Patagonian sheep farm with me, it's not much of a marriage anyway."
    The UK is not a Patagonian sheep farm, not that there is much wrong with Patagonian sheep farms
  • Do you need your irony meters calibrating, if so this tweet will help you do so.

    https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1159145253917601792
  • HYUFD said:

    No it is 46% to 43% when don't knows are included, it is 52% to 48% excluding Don't Knows
    Well it's crap news for us yoons anyway - it's alright for you English folk - but our only fun up here is Irn-Bru; that's no way to run a country.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,012
    Bang in the middle of it right now.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,043
    FF43 said:

    To be sure that's why Johnson's policy is to make the Conservative Party into a not so pale shadow of the Brexit Party. Problem is, he's now at the mercy of Farage who is quite happy to destroy Johnson just as Johnson wants to destroy him.
    Farage only destroys Boris if he repeats the 20%+ or so the Brexit Party got under May, at the moment with the Brexit Party down to about 10 to 15% it is Boris destroying Farage
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,543

    Do you need your irony meters calibrating, if so this tweet will help you do so.

    https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1159145253917601792

    The thing about Corbyn is, he just doesn't get English irony.
  • geoffwgeoffw Posts: 9,012
    "We must confront this racist bigotry wherever it rears its ugly head"
    Let's hope the electorate gets the message.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,289

    What evidence?

    The reason people are harping on about bollocks like sterling when we both earn our income and spend our expenditure in sterling so it's moot is because there is no real evidence.

    Employment is up, wages are up, inflation is low. A trifecta of good news but why let that stand in the way of a good moan?
    If GBP falls then the probability of inflation rises, then the amount of expenditure rises without any guarantee of a matching wage rise. Should wages then also rise to keep up then the profit earned by the employer will fall as wage bill rises and supply cost also rises. The reduction of profit results in a reduced amount of employment as the number of people that can be employed reduces.

    This description matches the 1960s/70s, where a pulse in inflation produced by a quadrupling of petrol prices following[1] a Middle Eastern war resulted in higher wage claims, double-digit inflation, an increase of unemployment ("Labour Isn't Working" derives from this period) and concomitant strikes and social unrest. This phenomenon where growth stalls, inflation and unemployment rises simultaneously is known as "stagflation" and is difficult to eradicate, as James Callaghan and Margaret Thatcher later found out.

    You are trying to decouple the exchange rate, inflation, unemployment and growth. This is not a good approach.

    [1] yes I know, also the collapse of Bretton Woods, the retreat from Empire, and possibly the popularity of Angel Delight.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,725
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,884
    HYUFD said:

    Farage only destroys Boris if he repeats the 20%+ or so the Brexit Party got under May, at the moment with the Brexit Party down to about 10 to 15% it is Boris destroying Farage
    At the moment.

    Farage won't help Johnson to make the moment last. He will attack Johnson on commitment and execution. Every time Johnson does something batshit, Farage will say something batshittier. It's a bidding war of crazy that only Farage can win.
  • llefllef Posts: 301
    Rcs1000 re "But it still doesn't change the fact that UK debt-to-GDP has risen from 34.3% to 87.4%."

    but 435bn of that debt is owned by the BOE (over 20% of GDP), and has effectively been written off, (given that the FED have just abandoned attempts to sell off its own QE bond holdings in the USA).

    so that 87.4% number is quite misleading surely?


  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    "If you don't want to live on a Patagonian sheep farm with me, it's not much of a marriage anyway."
    Why are you so prejudiced about the Welsh?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_Wladfa
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    ydoethur said:

    The thing about Corbyn is, he just doesn't get English irony.
    1. Corbyn, for all his sincerely held beliefs, isn't that bright.
    2. Corbyn, sincerely believes in the rights of the oppressed which leads to
    3. Corbyn, being blind to the anti-semitism of some of the supporters of those oppressed.

    I don't think he's a bad man, just not a very bright one, completely and disastrously unsuited for the role he currently occupies, surrounded by manipulative people I would not extend the same benefit of the doubt to. I'm sure if I ever met him and said 'Jeremy, meet my Jewish friend Simon' he would be genuinely pleased to meet him....as long as we steered clear of Israel/Palestine....)
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,725
    FF43 said:

    At the moment.

    Farage won't help Johnson to make the moment last. He will attack Johnson on commitment and execution. Every time Johnson does something batshit, Farage will say something batshittier. It's a bidding war of crazy that only Farage can win.
    Might that not be akin to an emperor's new clothes striptease competition, though ?
    At some point, some of their voters might realise how unsightly the whole mess is.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,918

    What evidence?

    The reason people are harping on about bollocks like sterling when we both earn our income and spend our expenditure in sterling so it's moot is because there is no real evidence.

    Employment is up, wages are up, inflation is low. A trifecta of good news but why let that stand in the way of a good moan?
    What on earth is this drivel about earning our income in sterling and spending our expenditure in sterling?

    Is the lunatic fringe now assuming we're going to stop trading with the rest of the world altogether on 31 October?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,839
    Nigelb said:

    Might that not be akin to an emperor's new clothes striptease competition, though ?
    At some point, some of their voters might realise how unsightly the whole mess is.
    Farage can always play the card of saying that the political class lied to us for 40 years about the EU and blame them for the impossibility of Brexit. You can already see in some of the comments on here how receptive Brexit supporters are to that message.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,550
    FF43 said:

    At the moment.

    Farage won't help Johnson to make the moment last. He will attack Johnson on commitment and execution. Every time Johnson does something batshit, Farage will say something batshittier. It's a bidding war of crazy that only Farage can win.
    Farage must be really pissed off then that so far Boris has done nothing "batshit".
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 76,725
    Warren has a less incoherent plan for expanding broadband access than Boris, and she's not even a candidate yet...
    https://www.wired.com/story/elizabeth-warren-unveils-plan-expand-broadband-access/
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,289
    Nigelb said:

    Might that not be akin to an emperor's new clothes striptease competition, though ?
    At some point, some of their voters might realise how unsightly the whole mess is.
    "The Bad Boys Of Brexit" contains an anecdote about Farage, Banks (and Wiggy?) skinny-dipping naked in Bournemouth immediately after the Referendum result.

    Pause.

    You will never get that image out of your head now. It's like watching tobacco-stained walruses playing Penis Lightsabres.
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    I wonder how the dairy rationing will work. The government could look really modern and techie if, instead of issuing paper coupons, it developed some kind of app.
    But which, based on recent form, would only work on Android. Well I suppose some PB Brexiteers would spin that as being for the common people and one in the eye for the Apple-using elites.
  • StereotomyStereotomy Posts: 4,092
    Yeah it's a little known fact in England that once Scotland becomes independent, Nicola Sturgeon will instantly explode into a billion twinkling motes of light and ascend to a higher plane
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,289
    Chris said:

    What on earth is this drivel about earning our income in sterling and spending our expenditure in sterling?

    Is the lunatic fringe now assuming we're going to stop trading with the rest of the world altogether on 31 October?
    The rest of the world does not exist and anybody who suggests it does is an unpatriotic Remoaner
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,884

    Farage must be really pissed off then that so far Boris has done nothing "batshit".
    Relatively speaking, of course. Johnson hasn't been more batshit than Farage. Farage will keep it that way.
  • Well said that man. It amazes me how the SNP get such an easy ride in the British media.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 12,511
    edited August 2019
    Chris said:

    What on earth is this drivel about earning our income in sterling and spending our expenditure in sterling?

    Is the lunatic fringe now assuming we're going to stop trading with the rest of the world altogether on 31 October?
    You are wasting your time. I've been there and done that.

    It appears that the gain I have made on swiss shares I hold quoted in swiss francs is not real nor the increase in the cost of my holiday to Iceland. These are figments of my imagination.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,289

    Yeah it's a little known fact in England that once Scotland becomes independent, Nicola Sturgeon will instantly explode into a billion twinkling motes of light and ascend to a higher plane
    If I listed all the science-fiction movies in which that is actually the ending, I'd embarrass myself further than I already have.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,678

    Well said that man. It amazes me how the SNP get such an easy ride in the British media.
    Because most people in England just shrug their shoulders and think it is up to the people in Scotland.
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,928
    Presumably if there is a no deal Brexit we can rely on a US emergency airdrop of Kraft cheese slices to reduce our dairy trade deficit.
    And next week a reminder that the Greens don't like fossil fuels
  • Because most people in England just shrug their shoulders and think it is up to the people in Scotland.
    Bolton and others should know better - they're SF equivalents and should be treated as such.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,839

    Bolton and others should know better - they're SF equivalents and should be treated as such.
    Who do you want to dub the voice of Nicola Sturgeon?
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Fenman said:

    Most of them would be prepared to sacrifice their great-grandchildren
    Fenman said:

    Most of them would be prepared to sacrifice their great-grandchildren
    And their children and grand children I’ve watched children and grand children pleading with that generation to vote remain to be told ‘we know better than you cause we’re older so we’re voting leave.
  • Who do you want to dub the voice of Nicola Sturgeon?
    the little krankie woman
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,884
    Nigelb said:

    Might that not be akin to an emperor's new clothes striptease competition, though ?
    At some point, some of their voters might realise how unsightly the whole mess is.
    Johnson is Farage's prisoner. He can't say, I'll pass on this one, because Farage will tear him to pieces. For example, someone puts forward a suggestion that could be a way out on the backstop. Just discussing it takes him a few days past October 31. He will have to shut it down in the most public and emphatic way because of what Farage will do to him.
  • Bolton and others should know better - they're SF equivalents and should be treated as such.
    Pardon?

    SF are the political arm of a paramilitary organisation with a very long and bloody history of killing innocent people.

    The SNP are a mainstream left of centre political movement which believes in an independent Scotland. They have absolutely no association with terrorism (or freedom fighters if you happen to prefer that term) and have never - at least in modern times - advocated or acted as apologists for violence as a means to achieve their ends.

    The comparison would be offensive to most reasonable people.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,550
    FF43 said:

    Relatively speaking, of course. Johnson hasn't been more batshit than Farage. Farage will keep it that way.
    "Batshit Boris" is the dog that hasn't barked. Your disappointment is palpable....
  • Pardon?

    SF are the political arm of a paramilitary organisation with a very long and bloody history of killing innocent people.

    The SNP are a mainstream left of centre political movement which believes in an independent Scotland. They have absolutely no association with terrorism (or freedom fighters if you happen to prefer that term) and have never - at least in modern times - advocated or acted as apologists for violence as a means to achieve their ends.

    The comparison would be offensive to most reasonable people.
    They're both want the destruction of the UK - that's equivalence enough for me. If I had my way the SNP top brass would all be in jail for Sedition
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,550
    viewcode said:

    "The Bad Boys Of Brexit" contains an anecdote about Farage, Banks (and Wiggy?) skinny-dipping naked in Bournemouth immediately after the Referendum result.

    Pause.

    You will never get that image out of your head now. It's like watching tobacco-stained walruses playing Penis Lightsabres.
    Is it?
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,928

    They're both want the destruction of the UK - that's equivalence enough for me. If I had my way the SNP top brass would all be in jail for Sedition
    And what of the people who vote for them?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,043
    FF43 said:

    Johnson is Farage's prisoner. He can't say, I'll pass on this one, because Farage will tear him to pieces. For example, someone puts forward a suggestion that could be a way out on the backstop. Just discussing it takes him a few days past October 31. He will have to shut it down in the most public and emphatic way because of what Farage will do to him.
    Boris won't even consider putting alternatives to the backstop to the EU until he has a majority, however to get that majority he has to be prepared to go for No Deal
  • And what of the people who vote for them?
    It would be impractical to jail all of them - but maybe a few could be used as examples
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 30,814

    Who do you want to dub the voice of Nicola Sturgeon?
    Su Pollard. Just for fun.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,043

    Well it's crap news for us yoons anyway - it's alright for you English folk - but our only fun up here is Irn-Bru; that's no way to run a country.
    Don't be too concerned, in 1995 in the second Quebec independence referendum Yes led most final polls but most Don't Knows voted to stay in Canada and and No won by a narrow 51% to 49% margin
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,678

    They're both want the destruction of the UK - that's equivalence enough for me. If I had my way the SNP top brass would all be in jail for Sedition
    What's so wrong with self determination?
  • They're both want the destruction of the UK - that's equivalence enough for me. If I had my way the SNP top brass would all be in jail for Sedition
    I want the destruction of the UK as well and I am English. It is not sedition, it is a simple recognition that people are poorly served by the current arrangements and that the best way to deal with that is to accept the independence of the various constituent parts of the UK so they remain close but independent friends.

    Again equating the entirely peaceful SNP with Sinn Fein is both ignorant and offensive to many people.

    Seems to me you are one step away from HYUFDs idiotic 'send in the troops' comments from a few days ago. Absolute lunacy.
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 3,928

    It would be impractical to jail all of them - but maybe a few could be used as examples
    I feel disappointed because I always read your username as Mr. J Briskin calling for indyref2. Funny how your eyes play tricks on you like that.
  • NormNorm Posts: 1,251
    I have no problem in offering Sturgeon a new indy ref but only after Brexit has been fully enacted as voted for by a simple UK majority. This would have to be after the transition period with a deal but could be brought forward in a no deal scenario. Had indyref 1 been won by 52:48 by the separatists we wouldn't still be discussing it 3 years later.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,884
    edited August 2019

    "Batshit Boris" is the dog that hasn't barked. Your disappointment is palpable....
    Brexit October 31 do or die as a policy is neither sensible nor wise. Ditto refusing to talk with EU partners about future relations. By comparison Corbyn is boringly sensible. Whether Johnson's policies, allowing for figures of speech, are actually batshit, is a judgment call, I guess.
  • What's so wrong with self determination?
    Nothing I guess - but they said Once In A Generation - we've all got limits.

    Lock Her Up
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,678

    It would be impractical to jail all of them - but maybe a few could be used as examples
    Why bother with jail? Priti will have them swinging from the nearest lamppost.
  • I want the destruction of the UK as well and I am English. It is not sedition, it is a simple recognition that people are poorly served by the current arrangements and that the best way to deal with that is to accept the independence of the various constituent parts of the UK so they remain close but independent friends.

    Again equating the entirely peaceful SNP with Sinn Fein is both ignorant and offensive to many people.

    Seems to me you are one step away from HYUFDs idiotic 'send in the troops' comments from a few days ago. Absolute lunacy.
    You know that SF are the mainstream nationalists in NI now don't you. The equivalence is clear and exists.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,735
    HYUFD said:

    Boris won't even consider putting alternatives to the backstop to the EU until he has a majority, however to get that majority he has to be prepared to go for No Deal
    Boris will never get a majority - that's what makes this so interesting...
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 14,012
    edited August 2019

    Well said that man. It amazes me how the SNP get such an easy ride in the British media.
    Indeed. I live in England in a part where hills of southern Scotland can be seen. The thought that our neighbours may soon be in a political union with Lithuania and Malta and out of a political union with England is both sad and ridiculous.

    In a sane world we might work on uniting Ireland and uniting Britain, preferably all either in or out of the EU. But we can dream on...

  • I feel disappointed because I always read your username as Mr. J Briskin calling for indyref2. Funny how your eyes play tricks on you like that.
    No I'm Mr J Briskin who predicted indyref2 within 10 years of the first one.
  • Why bother with jail? Priti will have them swinging from the nearest lamppost.
    Well I can't condone that - a few months in jail for them to see the error of their ways should be enough.
  • You know that SF are the mainstream nationalists in NI now don't you. The equivalence is clear and exists.
    I know what they are now. I also know what they have been for most of their history which is why your comparison is bloody stupid.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,289

    Is it?
    "Whum, whum, whum"
    "Bssht! Bssht!"
    "Whum, Whum, Whummmmmmmmm...whum whum"
    "Nigel, I am your father..."
    "Noooooooo!"
    "Whummmmmm"

    (Exeunt, pursued by condom)
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,678
    algarkirk said:

    Indeed. I live in England in a part where hills of southern Scotland can be seen. The thought that our neighbours may soon be in a political union with Lithuania and Malta and out of a political union with England is both sad and ridiculous.

    In a sane world we might work on uniting Ireland and uniting Britain, preferably all either in or out of the EU. But we can dream on...

    You are Sarah Palin and I claim my £5!
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,678

    No I'm Mr J Briskin who predicted indyref2 within 10 years of the first one.
    I thought it was JB Risk in Indyref2
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,678

    Well I can't condone that - a few months in jail for them to see the error of their ways should be enough.
    You hand-wringing softy!
  • I know what they are now. I also know what they have been for most of their history which is why your comparison is bloody stupid.
    What's bloody stupid is the people who vote for SF/SNP and want to break up our glorious Union. They're stupid as well as treasonable.
  • I thought it was JB Risk in Indyref2
    No J Briskin is a character from a Philip K Dick book (A black US president - is there anything that guy got wrong???)
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Can we stop talking about ‘no deal’ or’clean’ Brexit and start taking about WTO brexit which does not have the so called protection of GATT 24. Who is in control of the tariff setting, do they know what they are doing, who loses and who gains? This is not about queues at Dover it’s about the future of tens of thousands of businesses from bloody mozzarella to starter motors and jet engines, does any body know the answer without just say ‘ nothing to worry about go go wto’ ?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,043
    eek said:

    Boris will never get a majority - that's what makes this so interesting...
    With No Deal he could

    https://twitter.com/tianran/status/1157199736232927232?s=20
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    Suppose the buffoon isn't bluffing and he does pull that call a General Election after leaving stunt. What's to stop the EU agreeing to a new govt rejoining on the old terms instantaneously? We'd have been out of the EU for a couple of weeks so the referendum would be honoured.

    Worth it for the look on Johnson and Cummings faces when announced about a week into the campaign.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,385

    They're both want the destruction of the UK - that's equivalence enough for me. If I had my way the SNP top brass would all be in jail for Sedition
    So you don't distinguish between the peaceful belief in an independent Scotland (or Cornwall or Little Whingeing or whatever) expressed through the ballot box, and blowing up innocent people?

    Well, it's a view.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,884
    HYUFD said:



    Boris won't even consider putting alternatives to the backstop to the EU until he has a majority, however to get that majority he has to be prepared to go for No Deal

    That's his strategy and it may win him the election. Problem is he has to actually go to No Deal on October 31, not just threaten it, to be in the Brexit Party space. Once he's in it, it will be difficult to get out. And that assumes he gets a decent majority, which is by no means assured.
  • What's bloody stupid is the people who vote for SF/SNP and want to break up our glorious Union. They're stupid as well as treasonable.
    Yep you are a certifiable lunatic. Glad we have established that.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,289

    I thought it was JB Risk in Indyref2
    I thought he was Indiana Ref, Jr, who at the end of the day risked drinking a glass of fine Jim Beam sipping whisky as a reward for long endeavours.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,289

    You are Sarah Palin and I claim my £5!
    You are Michael Palin and I claim my shrubbery.
  • Suppose the buffoon isn't bluffing and he does pull that call a General Election after leaving stunt. What's to stop the EU agreeing to a new govt rejoining on the old terms instantaneously? We'd have been out of the EU for a couple of weeks so the referendum would be honoured.

    Worth it for the look on Johnson and Cummings faces when announced about a week into the campaign.

    Treaty law I'm afraid. For the same reason we should never consider unilaterally breaking treaties, the EU would be bound by its own laws to go through the accession process again.
  • rcs1000 said:

    So you don't distinguish between the peaceful belief in an independent Scotland (or Cornwall or Little Whingeing or whatever) expressed through the ballot box, and blowing up innocent people?

    Well, it's a view.
    Okay, there's obviously an historic difference between SF and SNP.

    All I'm saying is there is an equivalence (they're both the mainstream nationalist party on their part of the islands)
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    No J Briskin is a character from a Philip K Dick book (A black US president - is there anything that guy got wrong???)
    Well I agree with the dick bit
  • Yep you are a certifiable lunatic. Glad we have established that.
    Our beloved NHS doesn't inject me monthly for nothing!
  • Our beloved NHS doesn't inject me monthly for nothing!
    You need to tell them to up the dosage as it isn't working.
  • You need to tell them to up the dosage as it isn't working.
    Bad news for you Tyndall - They're reducing the Dose!!!
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 59,385

    Treaty law I'm afraid. For the same reason we should never consider unilaterally breaking treaties, the EU would be bound by its own laws to go through the accession process again.
    We're considering unilaterally and deliberately breaking our treaty commitments under the GATT 1947 and 1994 treaties.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    Treaty law I'm afraid. For the same reason we should never consider unilaterally breaking treaties, the EU would be bound by its own laws to go through the accession process again.

    Treaty law I'm afraid. For the same reason we should never consider unilaterally breaking treaties, the EU would be bound by its own laws to go through the accession process again.
    They can go through the accession process on paper - just have a bilateral agreement to maintain the status quo for the duration. Simple.
  • rcs1000 said:

    We're considering unilaterally and deliberately breaking our treaty commitments under the GATT 1947 and 1994 treaties.
    And as I have argued all along we should not do that. If a country breaks its treaty commitments then it is setting a very dangerous precedent.

    The Irony is of course that if the EU did break its own treaties then it is inevitable it would end up being taken to court for it.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Good point on Channel 4 News: British Airways don't know whether to be a top class or budget airline, and are failing at both.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 54,550

    Treaty law I'm afraid. For the same reason we should never consider unilaterally breaking treaties, the EU would be bound by its own laws to go through the accession process again.
    And the debate in the UK moves on to "Is it worth taking the extra funding from the NHS to fund the EU? If so, which hospitals do you want to close, Rejoiners?"
  • StreeterStreeter Posts: 684

    Conference is in Nuremberg this year, isn't it?
    No, it’s in Purgatory.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,043
    AndyJS said:

    Good point on Channel 4 News: British Airways don't know whether to be a top class or budget airline, and are failing at both.

    Yet International Airlines Group, BA's parent company, is still the 3rd largest European airline after Lufthansa and Ryanair
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    It's interesting how Twitter, in less than 10 years, has seemingly demolished about 1,000 years of good manners in public discourse. What an achievement. But it's the people who post rude comments on Twitter who are mostly to blame, not the platform, since you can't reasonably blame a medium for the content individuals choose to post on it.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 73,543
    Are we really reduced to relying on the French to not make everything a shambles?

    The Duke of Wellington must be turning in his grave.
  • maaarshmaaarsh Posts: 3,592
    HYUFD said:
    Trump's being a total dick.

    Beto is also blatantly politicising an attack to try and kick-start his flat lining campaign.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    And the debate in the UK moves on to "Is it worth taking the extra funding from the NHS to fund the EU? If so, which hospitals do you want to close, Rejoiners?"
    Only if you believe that EU membership was a negative benefit to the UK, that we paid the membership fee and received nothing back. If you believe that then you’ll never listen to any sound economic argument about our membership being of significant benefit to the UK only the lies of those who wish to capitalize on our departure.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,955
    AndyJS said:

    It's interesting how Twitter, in less than 10 years, has seemingly demolished about 1,000 years of good manners in public discourse. What an achievement. But it's the people who post rude comments on Twitter who are mostly to blame, not the platform, since you can't reasonably blame a medium for the content individuals choose to post on it.

    I blame emojis and reaction gifs. We reply in memes not arguments. It's one of the best things about PB. The quality of debate here - certainly on the topic of UK politics, possibly also on the topic of pinapple and pizza - surpasses anywhere else on the web.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,735
    HYUFD said:

    Yet International Airlines Group, BA's parent company, is still the 3rd largest European airline after Lufthansa and Ryanair
    Only because BA has a monopoly on Heathrow.

    BA and Heathrow fall behind even CDG as places I will willingly fly via..
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,568

    1. Corbyn, for all his sincerely held beliefs, isn't that bright.
    2. Corbyn, sincerely believes in the rights of the oppressed which leads to
    3. Corbyn, being blind to the anti-semitism of some of the supporters of those oppressed.

    I don't think he's a bad man, just not a very bright one, completely and disastrously unsuited for the role he currently occupies, surrounded by manipulative people I would not extend the same benefit of the doubt to. I'm sure if I ever met him and said 'Jeremy, meet my Jewish friend Simon' he would be genuinely pleased to meet him....as long as we steered clear of Israel/Palestine....)
    Oh bother, vanilla messing me about
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    The thing that should most concern Boris Johnson is how few don’t knows there are. He’s a known quantity and he’s cordially loathed by an absolute majority already.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,043

    The thing that should most concern Boris Johnson is how few don’t knows there are. He’s a known quantity and he’s cordially loathed by an absolute majority already.

    66% of Tories give him a favourable rating and 62% of Leavers
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    eek said:

    Only because BA has a monopoly on Heathrow.

    BA and Heathrow fall behind even CDG as places I will willingly fly via..
    It has a dominant position at Heathrow for short-haul flights. From the airline's perspective, Heathrow is 2-3x more expensive per pax than Gatwick/Stansted, and 4-5x more than elsewhere. Hence why it is home to so few budget shorthaul airlines.
This discussion has been closed.