politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The most accurate pollster at the Euros has Hunt rated better

New Ipsos-MORI focuses, inevitably, on the CON leadership race. These are some key findings:
Comments
-
#HasToBeHunt0
-
12% for BXP is potentially very interesting.0
-
PM ratings are the best, better than (hypothetical) VIs.0
-
Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%0
-
Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.0
-
ConHome Tory members next Tory leader poll taken yesterday and out this morning.TheScreamingEagles said:#HasToBeHunt
Boris 66% Hunt 30% Undecided 4%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/06/our-survey-next-tory-leader-johnson-66-per-cent-hunt-30-per-cent.html0 -
Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
0 -
In truth there are surely many more undecideds - being undecided makes you less likely to respond. But it's still very hard to see a path for Hunt.HYUFD said:
ConHome Tory members next Tory leader poll taken yesterday and out this morning.TheScreamingEagles said:#HasToBeHunt
Boris 66% Hunt 30% Undecided 4%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/06/our-survey-next-tory-leader-johnson-66-per-cent-hunt-30-per-cent.html0 -
Yup, I wonder if they might look at the SNP, but I think we all know what the SNP's price will be.Tissue_Price said:Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.
0 -
Still a win for Boris, though.TheScreamingEagles said:
Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
0 -
The SNP will only vote for a Brexit Deal with EUref2 attached which no Tory leader would allowTheScreamingEagles said:
Yup, I wonder if they might look at the SNP, but I think we all know what the SNP's price will be.Tissue_Price said:Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.
0 -
On the poll, the overall -6 for Brexit-supporting parties and +6 for Remain-supporting ones looks OTT (even allowing for some Remain Labour leaching to the LDs). Do IPSOS not weight to the referendum result?0
-
Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.tlg86 said:
Still a win for Boris, though.TheScreamingEagles said:
Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
0 -
FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
There's an opposition?Scott_P said:0 -
I meant relative to Hunt.TheScreamingEagles said:
Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.tlg86 said:
Still a win for Boris, though.TheScreamingEagles said:
Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.0 -
Both need a majority to get a 'Tory Brexit' through the Commons.Tissue_Price said:Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.
Ironically Boris losing a VONC pre October and winning a snap general election on a deliver Brexit Deal or No Deal ticket could do that0 -
IIRC - Ipsos MORI weight to demographics and GE2017 vote recall.Tissue_Price said:On the poll, the overall -6 for Brexit-supporting parties and +6 for Remain-supporting ones looks OTT (even allowing for some Remain Labour leaching to the LDs). Do IPSOS not weight to the referendum result?
0 -
Cameron did better in 2005 hypothetical polls than Davis, David Miliband did better in 2010 hypothetical polls than Ed Miliband, both were right.TheScreamingEagles said:
Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.tlg86 said:
Still a win for Boris, though.TheScreamingEagles said:
Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
2007 was pre 2008 crash0 -
I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?0
-
Is why Sir Oliver Letwin and Dominic Grieve have stepped up to the plate.KentRising said:
There's an opposition?Scott_P said:0 -
Farage seems to be the leader of the opposition now. Or maybe the LibDem leader, despite the fact nobody knows who that is.KentRising said:
There's an opposition?
0 -
NO, the question was "would consider" not "will vote". As the same question wasn't asked for the LDs, TBP or Labour, it's wholly invalid.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
Let's have a good look at the details when they are available.
1 -
Interestingly, the Tory lead is 30-25 amongst "all naming a party" rather than IPSOS's usual measure of 9 or 10/10 certainty to vote. Perhaps the uncertainty over the leadership is affecting that?TheScreamingEagles said:
IIRC - Ipsos MORI weight to demographics and GE2017 vote recall.Tissue_Price said:On the poll, the overall -6 for Brexit-supporting parties and +6 for Remain-supporting ones looks OTT (even allowing for some Remain Labour leaching to the LDs). Do IPSOS not weight to the referendum result?
https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2019-06/polmon-june-27-2019-topline.pdf
It seems reasonably clear to me that Boris will get a (potentially brief) honeymoon; but as @SouthamObserver noted FPT that may well create a reaction on the other side.0 -
It's not realistic at all.Tissue_Price said:Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.
In fact I think there could only ever have been one realistic plan for a putative new PM: to ask the EU for an extension, which would be used to hold a GE with the Conservatives offering a referendum between the Withdrawal Agreement and Revoke.
Of course that's not a realistic plan for becoming that next PM, which is a bit of a problem.1 -
Demand for BXP is clearly VERY elastic and VERY reliant on whether people believe the Tories are doing proper Brexit today or not.Tissue_Price said:12% for BXP is potentially very interesting.
There's a bit of a Bozza Bounce at the moment, but IMO he wants to moderate how sunny the uplands are that he promises. If he creates the impression of a stress-free Brexit at the stroke, nay flourish, of his pen and it doesn't happen, Farage will bounce back like Tigger* on speed. That could be pretty fatal for the Tories in a snap election.
(*The cartoon character, not the loose grouping of centrist MPs)
0 -
Only a quarter of that coming to pass puts the Tories out of office for a generation. It would make a couple of days’ high interest rates before Black Wednesday look like a tea party.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
Thanks for the response. So, your concern is in essence one of political management, then? I accept that's definitely a risk; it doesn't quite feel like a certainty (but ask me again in 3 months).Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
I wonder what the London sub sample looks like on IPSOS-mori0
-
Good summary, what you can expect though is for the usual suspects to (ie those who made the wild promises in 2016) to blame every but themselves.......IanB2 said:
Only a quarter of that coming to pass puts the Tories out of office for a generation. It would make a couple of days’ high interest rates before Black Wednesday look like a tea party.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
HYUFD said:
Cameron did better in 2005 hypothetical polls than Davis, David Miliband did better in 2010 hypothetical polls than Ed Miliband, both were right.TheScreamingEagles said:
Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.tlg86 said:
Still a win for Boris, though.TheScreamingEagles said:
Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
2007 was pre 2008 crash
It’s not even a hypothetical poll.
A hypothetical poll is “if the parties were lead by X, Y and Z, who would you vote for?”
Asking whether people would “consider” voting for someone at best simply establishes a ceiling. The LibDems pre-2010 used to get well over half the population saying they would consider supporting them; clearly this doesn’t translate into any particular VI.
I thought fake pollery was a banning offence here?
0 -
The difference with 2008/9 is we are going in having largely fixed the roof.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
Remember, the Great British public called the police when KFC ran out of chicken.Animal_pb said:So, your concern is in essence one of political management, then? I accept that's definitely a risk; it doesn't quite feel like a certainty (but ask me again in 3 months).
The first Brexit food riot is likely to follow No Deal fairly swiftly...0 -
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.0 -
Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.0 -
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
This is presumably why he is being warned not to reshuffle before a VONC
https://twitter.com/TelePolitics/status/1144228985620111360
Although if they are going to be shuffled out anyway, departing anti-no-deal minsters might VONC in any case0 -
Mind you some well known and not so well known will make loads of moneymatt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
-
I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.matt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
BoZo box office. Again.TheScreamingEagles said:I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.
0 -
I see Boris has gone full Esther McVey.Scott_P said:This is presumably why he is being warned not to reshuffle before a VONC
https://twitter.com/TelePolitics/status/1144228985620111360
Although if they are going to be shuffled out anyway, departing anti-no-deal minsters might VONC in any case0 -
Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow0 -
We haven't fixed the roof. We've just stopped it leaking.Philip_Thompson said:
The difference with 2008/9 is we are going in having largely fixed the roof.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.matt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
No fake pollery that was an actual poll putting a Boris led Tory Party up to 36% together with all the other polls we have had none of which have had in hypothetical voting intention a Boris led Tory Party trailing Labour and most of which have had a Boris led Tory Party ahead.IanB2 said:HYUFD said:
Cameron did better in 2005 hypothetical polls than Davis, David Miliband did better in 2010 hypothetical polls than Ed Miliband, both were right.TheScreamingEagles said:
Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.tlg86 said:
Still a win for Boris, though.TheScreamingEagles said:
Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
2007 was pre 2008 crash
It’s not even a hypothetical poll.
A hypothetical poll is “if the parties were lead by X, Y and Z, who would you vote for?”
Asking whether people would “consider” voting for someone at best simply establishes a ceiling. The LibDems pre-2010 used to get well over half the population saying they would consider supporting them; clearly this doesn’t translate into any particular VI.
I thought fake pollery was a banning offence here?
I know you despise Boris and hate polls putting Boris ahead but tough luck0 -
Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.Philip_Thompson said:
Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).
On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.0 -
-
Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No DealChris said:
Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.Philip_Thompson said:
Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).
On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.0 -
I'm used to disappointment.Animal_pb said:
To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.matt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
But the Brexit inquiry is something a lot of Leavers in government are afraid of happening in the event of No Deal.0 -
I suspect Arron Banks and therefore Nigel Farage may do well out of it from business sources unknownnichomar said:
Mind you some well known and not so well known will make loads of moneymatt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
Given that shagger thinks we get a transition with No Deal I'm not really convinced he knows what he's talking about.0
-
The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.HYUFD said:
Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow0 -
-
Of course, a Government Inquiry. The swift, sharp sword of Justice.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm used to disappointment.Animal_pb said:
To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.matt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
But the Brexit inquiry is something a lot of Leavers in government are afraid of happening in the event of No Deal.
[chortle]0 -
How are they going to get a deal through Parliament even if do we have a GE & the Conservatives win? It will still be the same old faces with the same old disagreements. They won a GE before on the commitment to leave the EU and the MPs have shown how much store they set by that.Tissue_Price said:Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.
Good afternoon, everyone.1 -
I swear to God I sometimes suspect that what Boris Johnson's girlfriend was trying to do with his laptop was delete a pseudonymous post to politicalbetting.com!HYUFD said:
Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No DealChris said:
Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.Philip_Thompson said:
Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).
On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.0 -
What were the other parties on?HYUFD said:
No fake pollery that was an actual poll putting a Boris led Tory Party up to 36% together with all the other polls we have had none of which have had in hypothetical voting intention a Boris led Tory Party trailing Labour and most of which have had a Boris led Tory Party ahead.IanB2 said:HYUFD said:
Cameron did better in 2005 hypothetical polls than Davis, David Miliband did better in 2010 hypothetical polls than Ed Miliband, both were right.TheScreamingEagles said:
Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.tlg86 said:
Still a win for Boris, though.TheScreamingEagles said:
Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.HYUFD said:Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
2007 was pre 2008 crash
It’s not even a hypothetical poll.
A hypothetical poll is “if the parties were lead by X, Y and Z, who would you vote for?”
Asking whether people would “consider” voting for someone at best simply establishes a ceiling. The LibDems pre-2010 used to get well over half the population saying they would consider supporting them; clearly this doesn’t translate into any particular VI.
I thought fake pollery was a banning offence here?0 -
The question is do you want it good or do you want it quick?Animal_pb said:
Of course, a Government Inquiry. The swift, sharp sword of Justice.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm used to disappointment.Animal_pb said:
To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.matt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
But the Brexit inquiry is something a lot of Leavers in government are afraid of happening in the event of No Deal.
[chortle]
Hutton cleared Blair promptly but Chilcot shredded the reputation of Blair in a way no other Prime Minister has been in the past.0 -
I think a subsequent post Mr. Thicky Labour government will certainly milk it as much as possible through a public enquiry. Chilcot on steroids.Animal_pb said:
To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.matt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
-
-
And then what....Scott_P said:twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1144233796054716416
0 -
Then thisFrancisUrquhart said:
And then what....Scott_P said:twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1144233796054716416
0 -
Boris doesn't have the ability to deliver a second class letter.HYUFD said:
Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No DealChris said:
Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.Philip_Thompson said:
Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).
On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.0 -
With Corbyn blocking EUref2 as well is Tom Watson about to launch a leadership challenge?Scott_P said:1 -
(as the actress said to the bishop)TheScreamingEagles said:
The question is do you want it good or do you want it quick?Animal_pb said:
Of course, a Government Inquiry. The swift, sharp sword of Justice.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm used to disappointment.Animal_pb said:
To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.matt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
But the Brexit inquiry is something a lot of Leavers in government are afraid of happening in the event of No Deal.
[chortle]
Hutton cleared Blair promptly but Chilcot shredded the reputation of Blair in a way no other Prime Minister has been in the past.
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.0 -
-
He does.Chris said:
The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.HYUFD said:
Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
Boris wins a majority by October 31st, then can pass the Withdrawal Agreement by October 31st too with the temporary Customs Union for GB May asked Barnier to impose removed.
No longer reliant on the DUP having won a Tory majority he could also hold a confirmatory referendum in NI on the backstop0 -
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.0 -
Who knew the wingnut in chief was so unpopular - remarkable.0
-
I do hope so, but I think it is unlikely. If so empty vessel Boris is sunk. I am not keen on the nonce-finder-general but he is someone that has energy and drive. If Corbyn is removed and replaced by anyone half decent everything changesNigel_Foremain said:
Boris doesn't have the ability to deliver a second class letter.HYUFD said:
Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No DealChris said:
Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.Philip_Thompson said:
Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).
On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.0 -
Popcorn!!!Scott_P said:
BUt yeah, if this doesn't lead one of Corbyn or Watson going...whats the point?0 -
So Boris is going to keep us in the customs union? Anyone told Mark Francois et al?HYUFD said:
He does.Chris said:
The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.HYUFD said:
Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
Boris wins a majority by October 31st, then can pass the Withdrawal Agreement by October 31st too with the temporary Customs Union for GB May asked Barnier to impose removed.
No longer reliant on the DUP having won a Tory majority he could also hold a confirmatory referendum in NI on the backstop0 -
Will you be setting up a fantasy football league again?Scrapheap_as_was said:Who knew the wingnut in chief was so unpopular - remarkable.
I'll win it this time as I was far too distracted by editing PB and Liverpool's champions league campaign last season.0 -
Sorry, comment meant to be here: I do hope so, but I think it is unlikely. If so empty vessel Boris is sunk. I am not keen on the nonce-finder-general but he is someone that has energy and drive. If Corbyn is removed and replaced by anyone half decent everything changesHYUFD said:
With Corbyn blocking EUref2 as well is Tom Watson about to launch a leadership challenge?Scott_P said:0 -
I am keeping my membership for the next leadership election. I give a Boris leadership 6 to 12 months tops. He is incompetent and a snowflakeTheScreamingEagles said:
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.0 -
Well, I hope you and he feel differently in a few months. You never know, it might not be as bad as you fear.TheScreamingEagles said:
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.0 -
How many MPs are in that lotSlackbladder said:
Popcorn!!!Scott_P said:
BUt yeah, if this doesn't lead one of Corbyn or Watson going...whats the point?0 -
Nope, Boris takes GB out of the Customs Union, he lets NI voters decide if they want to keep it in NI until a technical solution is found to the Irish borderTheScreamingEagles said:
So Boris is going to keep us in the customs union? Anyone told Mark Francois et al?HYUFD said:
He does.Chris said:
The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.HYUFD said:
Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
Boris wins a majority by October 31st, then can pass the Withdrawal Agreement by October 31st too with the temporary Customs Union for GB May asked Barnier to impose removed.
No longer reliant on the DUP having won a Tory majority he could also hold a confirmatory referendum in NI on the backstop0 -
You voted LD in 2017, Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leaderTheScreamingEagles said:
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.0 -
I would like to keep my membership to at least May 2022 then I will have been a member for 25 years.Nigel_Foremain said:
I am keeping my membership for the next leadership election. I give a Boris leadership 6 to 12 months tops. He is incompetent and a snowflakeTheScreamingEagles said:
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
My fear is that the party will go even more wingnut if Boris fails.
The spin will be Boris really didn't believe in Brexit and only backed it for his leadership ambitions, what we really need a true believer, so step forward Mark Francois or Andrew Bridgen as the next Tory leader after Boris.0 -
Labour loses working class Leave voters to the Brexit Party and Boris if Corbyn is removed even if they win back some Remainers from the LDsNigel_Foremain said:
Sorry, comment meant to be here: I do hope so, but I think it is unlikely. If so empty vessel Boris is sunk. I am not keen on the nonce-finder-general but he is someone that has energy and drive. If Corbyn is removed and replaced by anyone half decent everything changesHYUFD said:
With Corbyn blocking EUref2 as well is Tom Watson about to launch a leadership challenge?Scott_P said:0 -
Yes it could be a Patel v Baker v Francois contest if Boris fails to deliver Brexit or a Farage takeoverTheScreamingEagles said:
I would like to keep my membership to at least May 2022 then I will have been a member for 25 years.Nigel_Foremain said:
I am keeping my membership for the next leadership election. I give a Boris leadership 6 to 12 months tops. He is incompetent and a snowflakeTheScreamingEagles said:
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
My fear is that the party will go even more wingnut if Boris fails.
The spin will be Boris really didn't believe in Brexit and only backed it for his leadership ambitions, what we really need a true believer, so step forward Mark Francois or Andrew Bridgen as the next Tory leader after Boris.0 -
You really are stupid aren't you.HYUFD said:
You voted LD in 2017, Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leaderTheScreamingEagles said:
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
I vote swapped because I live in a Lib Dem/Labour marginal which helped the Tories gain a seat from Labour.
I also campaigned for the Tories in 2018 and 2019, which is an odd thing for a Lib Dem to do isn't it?0 -
Gove is lucky he didn't make the final 2 otherwise Sarah Vine would have just sunk his campaign today.
Jaw dropping stuff.0 -
Don't be coy, what did she say?Alistair said:Gove is lucky he didn't make the final 2 otherwise Sarah Vine would have just sunk his campaign today.
Jaw dropping stuff.0 -
Gosh, that's a strongly worded letter. I'm sure it will do the trick.0
-
Michael Fabricant lost his wig again in the Lichfield desert ??TheScreamingEagles said:
Then thisFrancisUrquhart said:
And then what....Scott_P said:twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1144233796054716416
0 -
My name is CarrieChris said:
I swear to God I sometimes suspect that what Boris Johnson's girlfriend was trying to do with his laptop was delete a pseudonymous post to politicalbetting.com!HYUFD said:
Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No DealChris said:
Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.Philip_Thompson said:
Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).
On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.
I live on the second floor
I live upstairs from you
Yes I think you've seen me before
If you hear something late at night
Some kind of trouble
Some kind of fight
Just don't ask me what it was
Just don't ask me what it was
Just don't ask me what it was
With apologies to Suzanne Vega
1 -
And JRM and a former cabinet members husband from the knownNigel_Foremain said:
I suspect Arron Banks and therefore Nigel Farage may do well out of it from business sources unknownnichomar said:
Mind you some well known and not so well known will make loads of moneymatt said:
As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.0 -
I think that once we swallow whole the EU's no deal preparations document (which of course we will have to) then immediately much will continue as is. That said, over the subsequent several months, as the tariff regime is established and changes occur (for example in our farming and livestock sectors) then changes will become apparent.Richard_Nabavi said:FPT:
Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.Animal_pb said:I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?
What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
As to the more tangible effects I see GBPUSD at around 1.10-1.15 and yes, a sizeable hit to GDP of the scale of the GFC. I don't see a wake up "gotcha" moment however (currency aside) and the vast majority of the UK will be largely unaware personally of the diminution of their wealth vs any alternative scenario (a deal, for example).
Hence the Leavers will be doing a lot of I told you so-ing. Even as they, we, all become poorer than we otherwise might have been.
0 -
I am sure the Tory candidate in Sheffield Hallam in 2017 will understandTheScreamingEagles said:
You really are stupid aren't you.HYUFD said:
You voted LD in 2017, Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leaderTheScreamingEagles said:
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
I vote swapped because I live in a Lib Dem/Labour marginal which helped the Tories gain a seat from Labour.
I also campaigned for the Tories in 2018 and 2019, which is an odd thing for a Lib Dem to do isn't it?0 -
Good afternoon, everyone.
They absolutely should back Hunt.
Boris is unfit to be in Cabinet, and it's pathetic that Conservative MPs backed him so much.0 -
And when the EU state its not an option (remember the backstop arrived only when it become obvious the issues the Good Friday agreement created).HYUFD said:
Nope, Boris takes GB out of the Customs Union, he lets NI voters decide if they want to keep it in NI until a technical solution is found to the Irish borderTheScreamingEagles said:
So Boris is going to keep us in the customs union? Anyone told Mark Francois et al?HYUFD said:
He does.Chris said:
The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.HYUFD said:
Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.Chris said:
I don't follow that.justin124 said:I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?
Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
Boris wins a majority by October 31st, then can pass the Withdrawal Agreement by October 31st too with the temporary Customs Union for GB May asked Barnier to impose removed.
No longer reliant on the DUP having won a Tory majority he could also hold a confirmatory referendum in NI on the backstop0 -
And YOU voted Remain in 2016.HYUFD said:
You voted LD in 2017, Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leaderTheScreamingEagles said:
I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.Animal_pb said:
(as the actress said to the bishop)
In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.
Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.0 -
remember fake tories vote yellow peril when they aren't happy.
true blue proper tories vote brexit or ukip party when they aren't happy.0 -
The surge in support for Boris after recent days (which I think he'd agree have been a bit suboptimal) is interesting support for the theory that any publicity is good publicity. The Brexit Party has been completely ignored by the media since the Euros and Peterborough, hence their slide.0