Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The most accurate pollster at the Euros has Hunt rated better

SystemSystem Posts: 12,171
edited June 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The most accurate pollster at the Euros has Hunt rated better than Boris when compared with Corbyn

New Ipsos-MORI focuses, inevitably, on the CON leadership race. These are some key findings:

Read the full story here


«1345

Comments

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    #HasToBeHunt
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    12% for BXP is potentially very interesting.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    PM ratings are the best, better than (hypothetical) VIs.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited June 2019

    #HasToBeHunt

    ConHome Tory members next Tory leader poll taken yesterday and out this morning.

    Boris 66% Hunt 30% Undecided 4%

    https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/06/our-survey-next-tory-leader-johnson-66-per-cent-hunt-30-per-cent.html
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    HYUFD said:

    #HasToBeHunt

    ConHome Tory members next Tory leader poll taken yesterday and out this morning.

    Boris 66% Hunt 30% Undecided 4%

    https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/06/our-survey-next-tory-leader-johnson-66-per-cent-hunt-30-per-cent.html
    In truth there are surely many more undecideds - being undecided makes you less likely to respond. But it's still very hard to see a path for Hunt.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679

    Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.

    Yup, I wonder if they might look at the SNP, but I think we all know what the SNP's price will be.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176

    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.
    Still a win for Boris, though.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited June 2019

    Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.

    Yup, I wonder if they might look at the SNP, but I think we all know what the SNP's price will be.
    The SNP will only vote for a Brexit Deal with EUref2 attached which no Tory leader would allow
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    edited June 2019
    On the poll, the overall -6 for Brexit-supporting parties and +6 for Remain-supporting ones looks OTT (even allowing for some Remain Labour leaching to the LDs). Do IPSOS not weight to the referendum result?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.
    Still a win for Boris, though.
    Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.

    Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821
    FPT:
    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176

    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.
    Still a win for Boris, though.
    Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.

    Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
    I meant relative to Hunt.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.

    Both need a majority to get a 'Tory Brexit' through the Commons.

    Ironically Boris losing a VONC pre October and winning a snap general election on a deliver Brexit Deal or No Deal ticket could do that
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679

    On the poll, the overall -6 for Brexit-supporting parties and +6 for Remain-supporting ones looks OTT (even allowing for some Remain Labour leaching to the LDs). Do IPSOS not weight to the referendum result?

    IIRC - Ipsos MORI weight to demographics and GE2017 vote recall.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited June 2019

    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.
    Still a win for Boris, though.
    Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.

    Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
    Cameron did better in 2005 hypothetical polls than Davis, David Miliband did better in 2010 hypothetical polls than Ed Miliband, both were right.

    2007 was pre 2008 crash
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Is why Sir Oliver Letwin and Dominic Grieve have stepped up to the plate.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900


    There's an opposition?

    Farage seems to be the leader of the opposition now. Or maybe the LibDem leader, despite the fact nobody knows who that is.

  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,900
    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    NO, the question was "would consider" not "will vote". As the same question wasn't asked for the LDs, TBP or Labour, it's wholly invalid.

    Let's have a good look at the details when they are available.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039

    On the poll, the overall -6 for Brexit-supporting parties and +6 for Remain-supporting ones looks OTT (even allowing for some Remain Labour leaching to the LDs). Do IPSOS not weight to the referendum result?

    IIRC - Ipsos MORI weight to demographics and GE2017 vote recall.
    Interestingly, the Tory lead is 30-25 amongst "all naming a party" rather than IPSOS's usual measure of 9 or 10/10 certainty to vote. Perhaps the uncertainty over the leadership is affecting that?

    https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2019-06/polmon-june-27-2019-topline.pdf

    It seems reasonably clear to me that Boris will get a (potentially brief) honeymoon; but as @SouthamObserver noted FPT that may well create a reaction on the other side.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,821

    Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.

    It's not realistic at all.

    In fact I think there could only ever have been one realistic plan for a putative new PM: to ask the EU for an extension, which would be used to hold a GE with the Conservatives offering a referendum between the Withdrawal Agreement and Revoke.

    Of course that's not a realistic plan for becoming that next PM, which is a bit of a problem.
  • Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,337

    12% for BXP is potentially very interesting.

    Demand for BXP is clearly VERY elastic and VERY reliant on whether people believe the Tories are doing proper Brexit today or not.

    There's a bit of a Bozza Bounce at the moment, but IMO he wants to moderate how sunny the uplands are that he promises. If he creates the impression of a stress-free Brexit at the stroke, nay flourish, of his pen and it doesn't happen, Farage will bounce back like Tigger* on speed. That could be pretty fatal for the Tories in a snap election.

    (*The cartoon character, not the loose grouping of centrist MPs)
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    Only a quarter of that coming to pass puts the Tories out of office for a generation. It would make a couple of days’ high interest rates before Black Wednesday look like a tea party.
  • Animal_pbAnimal_pb Posts: 608

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    Thanks for the response. So, your concern is in essence one of political management, then? I accept that's definitely a risk; it doesn't quite feel like a certainty (but ask me again in 3 months).
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    I wonder what the London sub sample looks like on IPSOS-mori
  • swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,464
    IanB2 said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    Only a quarter of that coming to pass puts the Tories out of office for a generation. It would make a couple of days’ high interest rates before Black Wednesday look like a tea party.
    Good summary, what you can expect though is for the usual suspects to (ie those who made the wild promises in 2016) to blame every but themselves.......
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    The difference with 2008/9 is we are going in having largely fixed the roof.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    HYUFD said:

    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.
    Still a win for Boris, though.
    Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.

    Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
    Cameron did better in 2005 hypothetical polls than Davis, David Miliband did better in 2010 hypothetical polls than Ed Miliband, both were right.

    2007 was pre 2008 crash

    It’s not even a hypothetical poll.

    A hypothetical poll is “if the parties were lead by X, Y and Z, who would you vote for?”

    Asking whether people would “consider” voting for someone at best simply establishes a ceiling. The LibDems pre-2010 used to get well over half the population saying they would consider supporting them; clearly this doesn’t translate into any particular VI.

    I thought fake pollery was a banning offence here?
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Animal_pb said:

    So, your concern is in essence one of political management, then? I accept that's definitely a risk; it doesn't quite feel like a certainty (but ask me again in 3 months).

    Remember, the Great British public called the police when KFC ran out of chicken.

    The first Brexit food riot is likely to follow No Deal fairly swiftly...
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751
    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.

    That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
  • mattmatt Posts: 3,789

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    This is presumably why he is being warned not to reshuffle before a VONC

    https://twitter.com/TelePolitics/status/1144228985620111360

    Although if they are going to be shuffled out anyway, departing anti-no-deal minsters might VONC in any case
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    Mind you some well known and not so well known will make loads of money
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.

    BoZo box office. Again.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Scott_P said:

    This is presumably why he is being warned not to reshuffle before a VONC

    https://twitter.com/TelePolitics/status/1144228985620111360

    Although if they are going to be shuffled out anyway, departing anti-no-deal minsters might VONC in any case

    I see Boris has gone full Esther McVey.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.

    Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
  • EndillionEndillion Posts: 4,976

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    The difference with 2008/9 is we are going in having largely fixed the roof.
    We haven't fixed the roof. We've just stopped it leaking.
  • Animal_pbAnimal_pb Posts: 608

    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.
    To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    IanB2 said:

    HYUFD said:

    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.
    Still a win for Boris, though.
    Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.

    Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
    Cameron did better in 2005 hypothetical polls than Davis, David Miliband did better in 2010 hypothetical polls than Ed Miliband, both were right.

    2007 was pre 2008 crash

    It’s not even a hypothetical poll.

    A hypothetical poll is “if the parties were lead by X, Y and Z, who would you vote for?”

    Asking whether people would “consider” voting for someone at best simply establishes a ceiling. The LibDems pre-2010 used to get well over half the population saying they would consider supporting them; clearly this doesn’t translate into any particular VI.

    I thought fake pollery was a banning offence here?
    No fake pollery that was an actual poll putting a Boris led Tory Party up to 36% together with all the other polls we have had none of which have had in hypothetical voting intention a Boris led Tory Party trailing Labour and most of which have had a Boris led Tory Party ahead.

    I know you despise Boris and hate polls putting Boris ahead but tough luck
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.

    That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
    Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.

    Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).

    On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.

    That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
    Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.

    Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).

    On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.
    Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No Deal
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Animal_pb said:

    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.
    To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".
    I'm used to disappointment.

    But the Brexit inquiry is something a lot of Leavers in government are afraid of happening in the event of No Deal.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,313
    nichomar said:

    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    Mind you some well known and not so well known will make loads of money
    I suspect Arron Banks and therefore Nigel Farage may do well out of it from business sources unknown
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Given that shagger thinks we get a transition with No Deal I'm not really convinced he knows what he's talking about.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751
    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.

    Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
    The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.
  • Animal_pbAnimal_pb Posts: 608

    Animal_pb said:

    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.
    To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".
    I'm used to disappointment.

    But the Brexit inquiry is something a lot of Leavers in government are afraid of happening in the event of No Deal.
    Of course, a Government Inquiry. The swift, sharp sword of Justice.

    [chortle]
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 3,080

    Both contenders are still promising no GE. How realistic is getting a deal (even an improved one) through Parliament without one? That Labour bloc is presumably key.

    How are they going to get a deal through Parliament even if do we have a GE & the Conservatives win? It will still be the same old faces with the same old disagreements. They won a GE before on the commitment to leave the EU and the MPs have shown how much store they set by that.

    Good afternoon, everyone.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,751
    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.

    That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
    Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.

    Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).

    On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.
    Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No Deal
    I swear to God I sometimes suspect that what Boris Johnson's girlfriend was trying to do with his laptop was delete a pseudonymous post to politicalbetting.com!
  • Andy_CookeAndy_Cooke Posts: 5,005
    HYUFD said:

    IanB2 said:

    HYUFD said:

    tlg86 said:

    HYUFD said:

    Ipsos Mori also had a Boris led Tory Party on up to 36% but a Hunt led Tories only up to 32%

    Fake news. It asked would they consider voting Tory, not would they vote Tory if x or y was Tory leader.
    Still a win for Boris, though.
    Not really, these hypothetical polls are rubbish.

    Back in 2007 45% of the country said they could vote for a Gordon Brown led Labour party at the next general election.
    Cameron did better in 2005 hypothetical polls than Davis, David Miliband did better in 2010 hypothetical polls than Ed Miliband, both were right.

    2007 was pre 2008 crash

    It’s not even a hypothetical poll.

    A hypothetical poll is “if the parties were lead by X, Y and Z, who would you vote for?”

    Asking whether people would “consider” voting for someone at best simply establishes a ceiling. The LibDems pre-2010 used to get well over half the population saying they would consider supporting them; clearly this doesn’t translate into any particular VI.

    I thought fake pollery was a banning offence here?
    No fake pollery that was an actual poll putting a Boris led Tory Party up to 36% together with all the other polls we have had none of which have had in hypothetical voting intention a Boris led Tory Party trailing Labour and most of which have had a Boris led Tory Party ahead.
    What were the other parties on?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Animal_pb said:

    Animal_pb said:

    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.
    To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".
    I'm used to disappointment.

    But the Brexit inquiry is something a lot of Leavers in government are afraid of happening in the event of No Deal.
    Of course, a Government Inquiry. The swift, sharp sword of Justice.

    [chortle]
    The question is do you want it good or do you want it quick?

    Hutton cleared Blair promptly but Chilcot shredded the reputation of Blair in a way no other Prime Minister has been in the past.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,313
    Animal_pb said:

    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.
    To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".
    I think a subsequent post Mr. Thicky Labour government will certainly milk it as much as possible through a public enquiry. Chilcot on steroids.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,133
    Scott_P said:

    twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1144233796054716416

    And then what....
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    edited June 2019

    Scott_P said:

    twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1144233796054716416

    And then what....
    Then this



  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,313
    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.

    That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
    Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.

    Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).

    On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.
    Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No Deal
    Boris doesn't have the ability to deliver a second class letter.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    edited June 2019
    Scott_P said:
    With Corbyn blocking EUref2 as well is Tom Watson about to launch a leadership challenge?
  • Animal_pbAnimal_pb Posts: 608

    Animal_pb said:

    Animal_pb said:

    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    I'm looking forward to the inevitable Brexit Inquiry and the subsequent Brexit equivalent of the Nuremberg trials for the leading Brexiteers.
    To quote Wesley, from TPB - "get used to disappointment".
    I'm used to disappointment.

    But the Brexit inquiry is something a lot of Leavers in government are afraid of happening in the event of No Deal.
    Of course, a Government Inquiry. The swift, sharp sword of Justice.

    [chortle]
    The question is do you want it good or do you want it quick?

    Hutton cleared Blair promptly but Chilcot shredded the reputation of Blair in a way no other Prime Minister has been in the past.
    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156
    Chris said:

    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.

    Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
    The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.
    He does.

    Boris wins a majority by October 31st, then can pass the Withdrawal Agreement by October 31st too with the temporary Customs Union for GB May asked Barnier to impose removed.

    No longer reliant on the DUP having won a Tory majority he could also hold a confirmatory referendum in NI on the backstop
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    Who knew the wingnut in chief was so unpopular - remarkable.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,313

    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.

    That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
    Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.

    Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).

    On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.
    Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No Deal
    Boris doesn't have the ability to deliver a second class letter.
    I do hope so, but I think it is unlikely. If so empty vessel Boris is sunk. I am not keen on the nonce-finder-general but he is someone that has energy and drive. If Corbyn is removed and replaced by anyone half decent everything changes
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,773
    Scott_P said:
    Popcorn!!!

    BUt yeah, if this doesn't lead one of Corbyn or Watson going...whats the point?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.

    Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
    The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.
    He does.

    Boris wins a majority by October 31st, then can pass the Withdrawal Agreement by October 31st too with the temporary Customs Union for GB May asked Barnier to impose removed.

    No longer reliant on the DUP having won a Tory majority he could also hold a confirmatory referendum in NI on the backstop
    So Boris is going to keep us in the customs union? Anyone told Mark Francois et al?
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679

    Who knew the wingnut in chief was so unpopular - remarkable.

    Will you be setting up a fantasy football league again?

    I'll win it this time as I was far too distracted by editing PB and Liverpool's champions league campaign last season.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,313
    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    With Corbyn blocking EUref2 as well is Tom Watson about to launch a leadership challenge?
    Sorry, comment meant to be here: I do hope so, but I think it is unlikely. If so empty vessel Boris is sunk. I am not keen on the nonce-finder-general but he is someone that has energy and drive. If Corbyn is removed and replaced by anyone half decent everything changes
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,313

    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
    I am keeping my membership for the next leadership election. I give a Boris leadership 6 to 12 months tops. He is incompetent and a snowflake
  • Animal_pbAnimal_pb Posts: 608

    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
    Well, I hope you and he feel differently in a few months. You never know, it might not be as bad as you fear.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,217

    Scott_P said:
    Popcorn!!!

    BUt yeah, if this doesn't lead one of Corbyn or Watson going...whats the point?
    How many MPs are in that lot
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.

    Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
    The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.
    He does.

    Boris wins a majority by October 31st, then can pass the Withdrawal Agreement by October 31st too with the temporary Customs Union for GB May asked Barnier to impose removed.

    No longer reliant on the DUP having won a Tory majority he could also hold a confirmatory referendum in NI on the backstop
    So Boris is going to keep us in the customs union? Anyone told Mark Francois et al?
    Nope, Boris takes GB out of the Customs Union, he lets NI voters decide if they want to keep it in NI until a technical solution is found to the Irish border
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
    You voted LD in 2017, Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leader
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679

    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
    I am keeping my membership for the next leadership election. I give a Boris leadership 6 to 12 months tops. He is incompetent and a snowflake
    I would like to keep my membership to at least May 2022 then I will have been a member for 25 years.

    My fear is that the party will go even more wingnut if Boris fails.


    The spin will be Boris really didn't believe in Brexit and only backed it for his leadership ambitions, what we really need a true believer, so step forward Mark Francois or Andrew Bridgen as the next Tory leader after Boris.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_P said:
    With Corbyn blocking EUref2 as well is Tom Watson about to launch a leadership challenge?
    Sorry, comment meant to be here: I do hope so, but I think it is unlikely. If so empty vessel Boris is sunk. I am not keen on the nonce-finder-general but he is someone that has energy and drive. If Corbyn is removed and replaced by anyone half decent everything changes
    Labour loses working class Leave voters to the Brexit Party and Boris if Corbyn is removed even if they win back some Remainers from the LDs
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
    I am keeping my membership for the next leadership election. I give a Boris leadership 6 to 12 months tops. He is incompetent and a snowflake
    I would like to keep my membership to at least May 2022 then I will have been a member for 25 years.

    My fear is that the party will go even more wingnut if Boris fails.


    The spin will be Boris really didn't believe in Brexit and only backed it for his leadership ambitions, what we really need a true believer, so step forward Mark Francois or Andrew Bridgen as the next Tory leader after Boris.
    Yes it could be a Patel v Baker v Francois contest if Boris fails to deliver Brexit or a Farage takeover
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    HYUFD said:

    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
    You voted LD in 2017, Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leader
    You really are stupid aren't you.

    I vote swapped because I live in a Lib Dem/Labour marginal which helped the Tories gain a seat from Labour.

    I also campaigned for the Tories in 2018 and 2019, which is an odd thing for a Lib Dem to do isn't it?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Gove is lucky he didn't make the final 2 otherwise Sarah Vine would have just sunk his campaign today.

    Jaw dropping stuff.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    edited June 2019
    HYUFD said:


    Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leader

    Bit shallow to vote on personality not policy isn't it ?

    But one wonders if personality is a big issue why he voted for Mrs May.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,679
    Alistair said:

    Gove is lucky he didn't make the final 2 otherwise Sarah Vine would have just sunk his campaign today.

    Jaw dropping stuff.

    Don't be coy, what did she say?
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Gosh, that's a strongly worded letter. I'm sure it will do the trick.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Scott_P said:

    twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1144233796054716416

    And then what....
    Then this



    Michael Fabricant lost his wig again in the Lichfield desert ??
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,884
    edited June 2019
    Chris said:

    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Yesterday's poll has 28% as first choice alone.

    That's before considering that people may vote on other matters too.
    Those two points are really the same one twice, if the Tories really do adopt No Deal, or a policy that effectively leads to No Deal.

    Of course it may be that people will vote on other issues as well as Brexit. But there's no reason that factor per se should benefit the Tories or the Brexit Party rather than other parties (does the latter even have any other issues?).

    On the most influential political issue of the day, the Tories would do well to remember that if they pin their hopes on No Deal, they're going to be fishing in a pond that contains not more than a third of the electorate, and with no assurance of catching anything like all the fish.
    Boris will deliver a FTA for GB and let Northern Ireland voters decide on the backstop by referendum not a Farage No Deal
    I swear to God I sometimes suspect that what Boris Johnson's girlfriend was trying to do with his laptop was delete a pseudonymous post to politicalbetting.com!
    My name is Carrie
    I live on the second floor
    I live upstairs from you
    Yes I think you've seen me before

    If you hear something late at night
    Some kind of trouble
    Some kind of fight

    Just don't ask me what it was
    Just don't ask me what it was
    Just don't ask me what it was

    With apologies to Suzanne Vega
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483

    nichomar said:

    matt said:

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    As long as leavers suffer longest and hardest and handwaving MPs suffer personal direct adverse consequences, so be it. They won’t, of course. In war there is always collateral damage. Leavers love a war analogy, don’t they.
    Mind you some well known and not so well known will make loads of money
    I suspect Arron Banks and therefore Nigel Farage may do well out of it from business sources unknown
    And JRM and a former cabinet members husband from the known
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    FPT:

    Animal_pb said:

    I'm probably going to regret asking this, but what makes you so convinced that No Deal ineluctably leads to economic apocalypse?

    Not economic apocalypse (except in Northern Ireland), but the media full every day for a long period of farmers going bust, fishing fleets being mothballed, car manufacturers laying off staff or withdrawing from the UK altogether, supplies being held up at ports, produce rotting, the pound collapsing, lorries held up on the approach to Dover, British ex-pats being left without medical cover, etc etc etc.

    What this will all mean in macro-economic terms is very hard indeed to say. I don't really think traditional economic models are any use at all here - no advanced Western economy has ever imposed wide-ranging economic sanctions on itself before - but if I had to hazard a guess I'd say the pound will head down to the range $1 to $1.10 and the overall hit to UK GDP will be comparable to the 2008/9 crisis, and the unemployment effect much worse than 2008/9.
    I think that once we swallow whole the EU's no deal preparations document (which of course we will have to) then immediately much will continue as is. That said, over the subsequent several months, as the tariff regime is established and changes occur (for example in our farming and livestock sectors) then changes will become apparent.

    As to the more tangible effects I see GBPUSD at around 1.10-1.15 and yes, a sizeable hit to GDP of the scale of the GFC. I don't see a wake up "gotcha" moment however (currency aside) and the vast majority of the UK will be largely unaware personally of the diminution of their wealth vs any alternative scenario (a deal, for example).

    Hence the Leavers will be doing a lot of I told you so-ing. Even as they, we, all become poorer than we otherwise might have been.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,156

    HYUFD said:

    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
    You voted LD in 2017, Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leader
    You really are stupid aren't you.

    I vote swapped because I live in a Lib Dem/Labour marginal which helped the Tories gain a seat from Labour.

    I also campaigned for the Tories in 2018 and 2019, which is an odd thing for a Lib Dem to do isn't it?
    I am sure the Tory candidate in Sheffield Hallam in 2017 will understand
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,806
    Good afternoon, everyone.

    They absolutely should back Hunt.

    Boris is unfit to be in Cabinet, and it's pathetic that Conservative MPs backed him so much.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,406
    HYUFD said:

    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    HYUFD said:

    Chris said:

    justin124 said:

    I don't think these figures add up really - Tories only on 26% with Brexit Pty on 12%?

    I don't follow that.

    Surely the closer the Tories get to adopting No Deal as their policy, the closer the Tory figure plus the Brexit Party figure should be to the percentage supporting No Deal?

    Per yesterday's poll, that's 28%, not 38%. Which would suggest the Tories have further to fall, if anything.
    Boris supports Brexit Deal or No Deal on October 31st and voted for the Withdrawal Agreement at MV3.

    Farage and the Brexit Party reject the Withdrawal Agreement outright and want to go straight to No Deal WTO terms so that does not follow
    The problem is that no one in the world except you believes there is going to be time for us to leave the EU with a deal by 31 October. Not even Boris Johnson.
    He does.

    Boris wins a majority by October 31st, then can pass the Withdrawal Agreement by October 31st too with the temporary Customs Union for GB May asked Barnier to impose removed.

    No longer reliant on the DUP having won a Tory majority he could also hold a confirmatory referendum in NI on the backstop
    So Boris is going to keep us in the customs union? Anyone told Mark Francois et al?
    Nope, Boris takes GB out of the Customs Union, he lets NI voters decide if they want to keep it in NI until a technical solution is found to the Irish border
    And when the EU state its not an option (remember the backstop arrived only when it become obvious the issues the Good Friday agreement created).
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,884
    HYUFD said:

    Animal_pb said:



    (as the actress said to the bishop)

    In all seriousness, if Boris & Co screw this one up, the judgement in court of public opinion will come far before any serious inquiry, much as it did for Blair. The posters on this board care about Chilcot; you'd be hard pressed to find many 'normal' folk that could even remember what his report covered.

    I think it is inevitable that they do screw this up.

    Like Richard Nabavi my membership of the Tory party after the 1st of November isn't guaranteed.

    Honestly if we wanted to join a party that was going to the trash the economy we'd have joined the Labour party.
    You voted LD in 2017, Richard Navabi has said he will vote LD if Boris is leader
    And YOU voted Remain in 2016.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Alistair said:

    Gove is lucky he didn't make the final 2 otherwise Sarah Vine would have just sunk his campaign today.

    Jaw dropping stuff.

    The cost of Megan and Harry's apartment ?
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    remember fake tories vote yellow peril when they aren't happy.

    true blue proper tories vote brexit or ukip party when they aren't happy.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,534
    The surge in support for Boris after recent days (which I think he'd agree have been a bit suboptimal) is interesting support for the theory that any publicity is good publicity. The Brexit Party has been completely ignored by the media since the Euros and Peterborough, hence their slide.
This discussion has been closed.