politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » This is not an early April Fools’ Day story. Iain Duncan Smith
Comments
-
Since the Tories fell into further chaos and Labour came out (almost) for a people's vote, he certainly seems to be on a roll. Will be interesting to see the next YouGov and Survation VI.OllyT said:
Agreed. May's main priority has always been to construct a Brexit that best suits the Conservative Party. The interests of the 58% of us that didn't vote Conservative in 2017 don't figure at all.ydoethur said:
And when she did offer alternatives they rejected them all. Rendering your point moot.Gardenwalker said:
May refused to give them an alternative until she was forced to do so just a few days ago.ydoethur said:
Nail. Head.alex. said:And it is ridiculous “Parliament” criticising May for not following an “alternative” course when they won’t even give her an alternative course to reject to follow.
She’s tried to dictate the whole process from the beginning. If it wasn’t for Gina Miller, Parliament would not have been asked at all.
Gina Miller really has a lot to answer for. But Parliament has far more to answer for.
Have a good morning.
Corbyn is content with that because he believes No Deal is a disaster and wants the Conservatives to fall into that trap and pay the electoral price.0 -
Sometimes I wonder if there are any rules for elections anymore. Bolsanaro from Brazil represented a party with tiny support yet won, the likely winner in Slovakia the same I believe (though not remotely similar in nature of the candidate) and from the Ukranian election
[comedian front runner] has torn up the rule book for election campaigning, the BBC's Jonah Fisher reports from Kiev. He has done no rallies and few interviews, and appears to have no strong political views apart from a wish to be new and different.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-47763176
Is being new and different, or stating you will be new and different, really enough to win elections now? Apparently. I hope it works out for them. It really feels like the sort of thing which can blow up in your face later as people don't really know what you stand for.0 -
Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%, Hunt is 4th on 6% and Javid 5th on 5%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html0 -
just proves that Con home is populated by loons.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html0 -
Looks like the Shagger is in with a shout.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html0 -
Gauke confirming he would resign from government before no deal, but reaffirming he doesn't think it will happen. He notes the PM's earlier remarks about respecting Parliament's votes for no 'no deal', and that the people wouldn't be happy if we did.0
-
You mean the turncoats who voted for the deal are still receiving support?HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%, Hunt is 4th on 6% and Javid 5th on 5%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html
2nd?! Try adding a few onto that.GIN1138 said:
It's OK C_R it's just the Tory Party having a collective nervous breakdown for the second weekend in a row.Casino_Royale said:Just logged on and seen the thread header..
WTF?0 -
Ok, how do they win round 170 colleagues for a compromiss which results in a long extension?IanB2 said:Gauke confirming he would resign from government before no deal, but reaffirming he doesn't think it will happen. He notes the PM's earlier remarks about respecting Parliament's votes for no 'no deal', and that the people wouldn't be happy if we did.
0 -
HY continues to present these as "polls" despite the fact that they are not. It's a self-selected sample of a self-selected population.WhisperingOracle said:
Looks like the Shagger is in with a shout.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html0 -
Today is a slightly easier day for May to survive. Only 23 hours long.
Off topic, I keep getting adverts for sandals on PB. Targeted marketing at LibDems gone slightly astray.0 -
But I do get the feeling the conservative grassroots still like Boris. Bumbling incompetence and cynical venality cancelled out by his supposed quixotic patriotism.0
-
Point of order: 70.8% of the electorate didn't vote Conservative in the 2017 GE.OllyT said:
Agreed. May's main priority has always been to construct a Brexit that best suits the Conservative Party. The interests of the 58% of us that didn't vote Conservative in 2017 don't figure at all.ydoethur said:
And when she did offer alternatives they rejected them all. Rendering your point moot.Gardenwalker said:
May refused to give them an alternative until she was forced to do so just a few days ago.ydoethur said:
Nail. Head.alex. said:And it is ridiculous “Parliament” criticising May for not following an “alternative” course when they won’t even give her an alternative course to reject to follow.
She’s tried to dictate the whole process from the beginning. If it wasn’t for Gina Miller, Parliament would not have been asked at all.
Gina Miller really has a lot to answer for. But Parliament has far more to answer for.
Have a good morning.
Corbyn is content with that because he believes No Deal is a disaster and wants the Conservatives to fall into that trap and pay the electoral price.0 -
A strong whip, opposition support, and public pressure.kle4 said:
Ok, how do they win round 170 colleagues for a compromiss which results in a long extension?IanB2 said:Gauke confirming he would resign from government before no deal, but reaffirming he doesn't think it will happen. He notes the PM's earlier remarks about respecting Parliament's votes for no 'no deal', and that the people wouldn't be happy if we did.
0 -
5,999,524
Revoke pretty much in the bag, I think we can all agree.0 -
Did you see last night's poll on revocation ?Ishmael_Z said:5,999,524
Revoke pretty much in the bag, I think we can all agree.0 -
Thornberry knows it. May knows it. That's why they voted Remain. The inescapable fact is that Brexit is a degradation of the status quo. Remainers can rationalise it by saying, we voted for the better option, we lost, we respect the result, and so we commit to limiting the damage. Leavers can't rationally say, we voted to make things worse, but never mind. Hence the delusions. Everyone is at fault for the mess, except those that voted for it.kle4 said:
Thornberry knows it. I dont like to suggest insincerity but more and more on Brexit I cannot believe on a number of issues that so many people do not understand things.CarlottaVance said:AAAAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHHH!
https://twitter.com/pmdfoster/status/1112267104437391360
Therefore it is cover for cynical positioning. Davis, Johnson and go are the same so it's not a partisan point. And May and co did it too when trying to change a WA they knew and had said could not be changed.0 -
If they had the ability for the first they'd have acted differently before now, maybe, and there's plenty of public support for no deal so that won't work.IanB2 said:
A strong whip, opposition support, and public pressure.kle4 said:
Ok, how do they win round 170 colleagues for a compromiss which results in a long extension?IanB2 said:Gauke confirming he would resign from government before no deal, but reaffirming he doesn't think it will happen. He notes the PM's earlier remarks about respecting Parliament's votes for no 'no deal', and that the people wouldn't be happy if we did.
I'm getting ones for discount prams. I do not know what could I possibly have looked at to get those as ads as I do not have children.SandyRentool said:Today is a slightly easier day for May to survive. Only 23 hours long.
Off topic, I keep getting adverts for sandals on PB. Targeted marketing at LibDems gone slightly astray.0 -
Watson saying Labour is prepared to support a variety of soft Brexit proposals underpinned by a people's vote.0
-
Don’t conflate the two. If a permanent CU in the PD is what it takes, we can still leave on 12th April.kle4 said:
Ok, how do they win round 170 colleagues for a compromiss which results in a long extension?IanB2 said:Gauke confirming he would resign from government before no deal, but reaffirming he doesn't think it will happen. He notes the PM's earlier remarks about respecting Parliament's votes for no 'no deal', and that the people wouldn't be happy if we did.
We will then hurtle into a General Election as the irreconcilables won’t support May in a VONC.
What fun.
Alternatively, May refuses to pursue a CU, we crash out, or Parliament gets its act together and VONCs her, with Corbyn as new PM.
Three options. All great.0 -
Hmmmm, remind me.WhisperingOracle said:
Did you see last night's poll on revocation ?Ishmael_Z said:5,999,524
Revoke pretty much in the bag, I think we can all agree.0 -
‘New Party A’ would emphasise community and society, be happy with current or higher levels of immigration, want more action to tackle climate change, support aid to poorer countries, promote rehabilitation in the criminal justice system, strongly support rights for same-sex couples and favour international co-operation, including the closest possible links with the EU after Brexit. ‘New Party B’ would aim to reduce immigration, take a tougher line on law and order, spend the international aid budget in the UK instead, prefer the UK to act independently with few formal ties to the EU after Brexit, and argue that the threat of climate change had been exaggerated, that traditional values had been wrongly neglected and that the government had become too much of a nanny state. When I asked people how they would vote in an election with these new entrants standing against the current players, the liberal ‘New Party A’ did well, with 24% of the vote, including nearly a third of 2017 Labour voters and nearly half of Lib Dems. But they were pipped at the post by the much more conservative ‘New Party B’, with 27%, including more than four in ten 2017 Tories and nearly half of Leave voters.
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/03/mind-the-gap-why-the-brexit-debacle-has-put-both-labour-and-the-tories-under-threat/0 -
Foxy said:
Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvoteScott_P said:
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=190 -
Ugh. I wish they'd just go for a referendum on the WA, or pick another option without the need for a referendum. There's no point in a referendum except to remain, so there's no need to pick alternative options to go up against remain.IanB2 said:Watson saying Labour is prepared to support a variety of soft Brexit proposals underpinned by a people's vote.
0 -
She should have shown some leadership, got rid of some of the dissenters in her cabinet, and then dared anyone to go against her. She back pedalled , crawled , bribed and sucked up hoping to placate everyone and she has got exactly what you would expect, derision from all sides.kle4 said:
Yes. Because while she's a problem, the bigger problem is the party. 170 no dealers vs 130 presumed something else. That's the reason she's not dared have a plan b and put us in risk of accidental no deal rather than preparing for somethingmalcolmg said:
#Is she incapable of thinking up a plan B, given she had 3 years?alex. said:And it is ridiculous “Parliament” criticising May for not following an “alternative” course when they won’t even give her an alternative course to reject to follow.
0 -
I'm still relying on the good sense of the Tory MPs not to let him get anywhere near the membership run off.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%, Hunt is 4th on 6% and Javid 5th on 5%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html0 -
Yet the same ConHome polling sample had 60% backing May's Deal last Friday, it is not all hard Brexit diehards. Deltapoll this morning has Boris ahead amongst all voters as next Tory leader, Opinium last night had Boris the only Tory leadership candidate with better positive future PM ratings than Corbyn. The momentum is all with Boris.IanB2 said:
HY continues to present these as "polls" despite the fact that they are not. It's a self-selected sample of a self-selected population.WhisperingOracle said:
Looks like the Shagger is in with a shout.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html
My Tory Association AGM last Friday had a straw poll with Boris and Raab the top two so the ConHome poll today entirely in accordance with what I am seeing from Tory members on the ground0 -
Morning GIN, the frothers are on overdrive this weather. Nutters are all coming out of the woodwork.GIN1138 said:
Morning Malc.malcolmg said:
Not at all you halfwitted cretinous blowhard, get your head out of your own butt.Gardenwalker said:
Nobody is seriously claiming Brexit has aided our economy, and there’s decent enough evidence of resultant economic slowdown, yet for some reason PB’s finest wish to attack this graph?DecrepitJohnL said:
You have misunderstood the CER graph. The comparison is with the actual performance of a basket of other countries used to model our own economy.CD13 said:Mr L,
It shows what it thinks would have happened had we taken a different course. Balls and uncles come to mind.
PS My stories may be sh*te but they are my own work.
It must truly be embarrassing to have voted for Brexit.0 -
Aren't there quite a few Con MPs on record as saying they'll leave the party if Boris became Tory leader?OllyT said:
I'm still relying on the good sense of the Tory MPs not to let him get anywhere near the membership run off.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%, Hunt is 4th on 6% and Javid 5th on 5%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html0 -
I was being charitableBenpointer said:
Point of order: 70.8% of the electorate didn't vote Conservative in the 2017 GE.OllyT said:
Agreed. May's main priority has always been to construct a Brexit that best suits the Conservative Party. The interests of the 58% of us that didn't vote Conservative in 2017 don't figure at all.ydoethur said:
And when she did offer alternatives they rejected them all. Rendering your point moot.Gardenwalker said:
May refused to give them an alternative until she was forced to do so just a few days ago.ydoethur said:
Nail. Head.alex. said:And it is ridiculous “Parliament” criticising May for not following an “alternative” course when they won’t even give her an alternative course to reject to follow.
She’s tried to dictate the whole process from the beginning. If it wasn’t for Gina Miller, Parliament would not have been asked at all.
Gina Miller really has a lot to answer for. But Parliament has far more to answer for.
Have a good morning.
Corbyn is content with that because he believes No Deal is a disaster and wants the Conservatives to fall into that trap and pay the electoral price.0 -
@Foxy - quote: Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvote
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=19
I think thats what would be called 'a tie'0 -
Hardly decisive, especially with barely half the electorate between them. Where are the other options?CarlottaVance said:‘New Party A’ would emphasise community and society, be happy with current or higher levels of immigration, want more action to tackle climate change, support aid to poorer countries, promote rehabilitation in the criminal justice system, strongly support rights for same-sex couples and favour international co-operation, including the closest possible links with the EU after Brexit. ‘New Party B’ would aim to reduce immigration, take a tougher line on law and order, spend the international aid budget in the UK instead, prefer the UK to act independently with few formal ties to the EU after Brexit, and argue that the threat of climate change had been exaggerated, that traditional values had been wrongly neglected and that the government had become too much of a nanny state. When I asked people how they would vote in an election with these new entrants standing against the current players, the liberal ‘New Party A’ did well, with 24% of the vote, including nearly a third of 2017 Labour voters and nearly half of Lib Dems. But they were pipped at the post by the much more conservative ‘New Party B’, with 27%, including more than four in ten 2017 Tories and nearly half of Leave voters.
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/03/mind-the-gap-why-the-brexit-debacle-has-put-both-labour-and-the-tories-under-threat/0 -
I think you underestimate the extent to which people implicitly believe what is written in their newspapers of choice. They have little or no exposure to countering arguments. Most Tory grassroots still take the Telegraph. They believe Johnson.WhisperingOracle said:But I do get the feeling the conservative grassroots still like Boris. Bumbling incompetence and cynical venality cancelled out by his supposed quixotic patriotism.
0 -
IanB2 said:
It is ticking up more slowly now, but should make 6,000,000 within the hourIshmael_Z said:5,999,524
Revoke pretty much in the bag, I think we can all agree.
Meanwhile someone has gamely started a new "no deal" one, currently on 72,500
Isn't the old No Deal one still running and just shy of 600k?0 -
It's people throwing their hats in the ring to make sure they can trade a Cabinet seat in the new regime. Well, I hope whoever wins completely ignore any such pledge they may have made. The last thing we need is the same shit team under a new manager. Clear most of them out, start again.....GIN1138 said:
It's OK C_R it's just the Tory Party having a collective nervous breakdown for the second weekend in a row.Casino_Royale said:Just logged on and seen the thread header..
WTF?0 -
Interesting poll on alternative parties:
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/03/mind-the-gap-why-the-brexit-debacle-has-put-both-labour-and-the-tories-under-threat/0 -
I have had the misfortune to read some and you do not come across well. Self righteous , hard hearted right wing despot who would suggest the poor "eat cake" and if they do not share your superior opinion they are stupid.Gardenwalker said:
Either you have never read any of my posts, or you have a singular definition of “right wing”.malcolmg said:
Have you ever read the right wing bilge you post. You must be a right bundle of laughs, I would expect you to have a little moustache and like painting.Gardenwalker said:
The cretin is you.malcolmg said:
Not at all you halfwitted cretinous blowhard, get your head out of your own butt.Gardenwalker said:
Nobody is seriously claiming Brexit has aided our economy, and there’s decent enough evidence of resultant economic slowdown, yet for some reason PB’s finest wish to attack this graph?DecrepitJohnL said:
You have misunderstood the CER graph. The comparison is with the actual performance of a basket of other countries used to model our own economy.CD13 said:Mr L,
It shows what it thinks would have happened had we taken a different course. Balls and uncles come to mind.
PS My stories may be sh*te but they are my own work.
It must truly be embarrassing to have voted for Brexit.
I presume you post from an asylum as your contributions are both repetitive and demented.0 -
The current parties.IanB2 said:
Hardly decisive, especially with barely half the electorate between them. Where are the other options?CarlottaVance said:‘New Party A’ would emphasise community and society, be happy with current or higher levels of immigration, want more action to tackle climate change, support aid to poorer countries, promote rehabilitation in the criminal justice system, strongly support rights for same-sex couples and favour international co-operation, including the closest possible links with the EU after Brexit. ‘New Party B’ would aim to reduce immigration, take a tougher line on law and order, spend the international aid budget in the UK instead, prefer the UK to act independently with few formal ties to the EU after Brexit, and argue that the threat of climate change had been exaggerated, that traditional values had been wrongly neglected and that the government had become too much of a nanny state. When I asked people how they would vote in an election with these new entrants standing against the current players, the liberal ‘New Party A’ did well, with 24% of the vote, including nearly a third of 2017 Labour voters and nearly half of Lib Dems. But they were pipped at the post by the much more conservative ‘New Party B’, with 27%, including more than four in ten 2017 Tories and nearly half of Leave voters.
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/03/mind-the-gap-why-the-brexit-debacle-has-put-both-labour-and-the-tories-under-threat/0 -
Sir John Major on Marr now urges a cross party national unity government0
-
Yes/no questions with no other options would be better presented without the DKs:CarlottaVance said:@Foxy - quote: Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvote
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=19
I think thats what would be called 'a tie'
Revoke - 51% support
Referendum - 51%
No Deal - 46%0 -
On 108 occasions, the prime minister pledged that Britain would leave the European Union on March 29th. Yet with just over a week to go, she wrote to Donald Tusk, to ask for more time. She told parliament that she didn't want to do it, but she had to.
But this time it's different from the previous u-turn on extension.. She has already told parliament that the UK would have to find "an alternative way forward", which was "almost certain" to involve holding European elections. She has also confirmed that parliament doesn't want a no deal (and neither does she)
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47752017
So that's what going to happen. (Value at 1.32 on Betfair). The question is: what reason (or "political event") is she going to give the EU?
She has several options:
1. A General Election. Possible but looking very risky for the Tories at the moment (and risky for the EU unless they foresee a Corbyn minority government that will break the logjam)
2. A change of Tory leader. Very risky for the EU. Even more of a logjam in parliament under a Brexit PM.
3. She pledges to allow parliament to determine the way forward (Letwin) and enact its conclusions. But is that in her character?
4. A second referendum. She won't ask for that except as a result of 3.
5. ??0 -
0
-
Tim Bale''s scientific Tory members poll from Sussex Uni last December also had Boris ahead on 20%, Mogg second on 15% and Javid and Davis third on 8%HYUFD said:
Yet the same ConHome polling sample had 60% backing May's Deal last Friday, it is not all hard Brexit diehards. Deltapoll this morning has Boris ahead amongst all voters as next Tory leader, Opinium last night had Boris the only Tory leadership candidate with better positive future PM ratings than Corbyn. The momentum is all with Boris.IanB2 said:
HY continues to present these as "polls" despite the fact that they are not. It's a self-selected sample of a self-selected population.WhisperingOracle said:
Looks like the Shagger is in with a shout.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html
My Tory Association AGM last Friday had a straw poll with Boris and Raab the top two so the ConHome poll today entirely in accordance with what I am seeing from Tory members on the ground
https://esrcpartymembersproject.org0 -
That's not true.CarlottaVance said:0 -
Labour voters who backed Leave will be able to do so again in another referendum so I don't see what the problem is.CarlottaVance said:0 -
Ok. Making some deductions from the article that would produce something like:CarlottaVance said:
The current parties.IanB2 said:
Hardly decisive, especially with barely half the electorate between them. Where are the other options?CarlottaVance said:‘New Party A’ would emphasise community and society, be happy with current or higher levels of immigration, want more action to tackle climate change, support aid to poorer countries, promote rehabilitation in the criminal justice system, strongly support rights for same-sex couples and favour international co-operation, including the closest possible links with the EU after Brexit. ‘New Party B’ would aim to reduce immigration, take a tougher line on law and order, spend the international aid budget in the UK instead, prefer the UK to act independently with few formal ties to the EU after Brexit, and argue that the threat of climate change had been exaggerated, that traditional values had been wrongly neglected and that the government had become too much of a nanny state. When I asked people how they would vote in an election with these new entrants standing against the current players, the liberal ‘New Party A’ did well, with 24% of the vote, including nearly a third of 2017 Labour voters and nearly half of Lib Dems. But they were pipped at the post by the much more conservative ‘New Party B’, with 27%, including more than four in ten 2017 Tories and nearly half of Leave voters.
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/03/mind-the-gap-why-the-brexit-debacle-has-put-both-labour-and-the-tories-under-threat/
New social conservatives: 27%
New social liberal 24%
Labour around 22%
Conservative around 20%
LibDem around 4%
Others 3%
Under our current voting system that would be a very messy election, impossible to predict.0 -
So between Revoke and a LosersVote Referendum its exactly a tie.IanB2 said:
Yes/no questions with no other options would be better presented without the DKs:CarlottaVance said:@Foxy - quote: Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvote
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=19
I think thats what would be called 'a tie'
Revoke - 51% support
Referendum - 51%
No Deal - 46%0 -
It would be the best option for the country but yes party politics as ever comes firsttlg86 said:
I just can't see it. Labour wouldn't accept an invitation to join one and I reckon there's enough Tories who'd bring down the whole show if it was suggested.HYUFD said:Sir John Major on Marr now urges a cross party national unity government
0 -
But an option with huge if not yet overwhelming support isn't even on the agenda of the normal political process. If you are a fan of democracy that ought to worry you.CarlottaVance said:@Foxy - quote: Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvote
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=19
I think thats what would be called 'a tie'0 -
I don't think Major was suggesting that SNP MPs be invited to join the GoNU.malcolmg said:
More moronic bollox from the Tories, too thick to make a decision themselves they now want to bring in the nutters from the other useless parties to make it even worse.HYUFD said:Sir John Major on Marr now urges a cross party national unity government
0 -
Major also urges the Deal to be passed with a confirmatory referendum0
-
It is a Tory so guaranteed to be lying about it, especially that one.Slackbladder said:
That's not true.CarlottaVance said:0 -
IDS never lost a General Election as Tory Leader0
-
We know that Leave voters in general are against a referendum - especially if Remain is on the ballot paper.Benpointer said:
Labour voters who backed Leave will be able to do so again in another referendum so I don't see what the problem is.CarlottaVance said:0 -
This is where I think the Shagger's party appeal intersects with a national appeal as mentioned below. Alex is probably correct that Tory members don't see his flaws ; but a number of Tory voters rather than members see his flaws and still support him.HYUFD said:
Tim Bale''s scientific Tory members poll from Sussex Uni last December also had Boris ahead on 20%, Mogg second on 15% and Javid and Davis third on 8%HYUFD said:
Yet the same ConHome polling sample had 60% backing May's Deal last Friday, it is not all hard Brexit diehards. Deltapoll this morning has Boris ahead amongst all voters as next Tory leader, Opinium last night had Boris the only Tory leadership candidate with better positive future PM ratings than Corbyn. The momentum is all with Boris.IanB2 said:
HY continues to present these as "polls" despite the fact that they are not. It's a self-selected sample of a self-selected population.WhisperingOracle said:
Looks like the Shagger is in with a shout.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html
My Tory Association AGM last Friday had a straw poll with Boris and Raab the top two so the ConHome poll today entirely in accordance with what I am seeing from Tory members on the ground
https://esrcpartymembersproject.org0 -
Lady haw haw on double duty this weather, Tories are bricking it. They have seen the future.CarlottaVance said:0 -
6m!!! Oh happy day.0
-
Don't worry - I doubt they'll ask the nutters from the SNP.malcolmg said:
More moronic bollox from the Tories, too thick to make a decision themselves they now want to bring in the nutters from the other useless parties to make it even worse.HYUFD said:Sir John Major on Marr now urges a cross party national unity government
0 -
46% for No Deal is 1% more than the 45% Yes to independence in Scotland got.IanB2 said:
Yes/no questions with no other options would be better presented without the DKs:CarlottaVance said:@Foxy - quote: Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvote
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=19
I think thats what would be called 'a tie'
Revoke - 51% support
Referendum - 51%
No Deal - 46%
Remain and revoke Article 50 might narrowly win an EUref2 over Leave with No Deal but on those numbers there will be a lot of furious Leave voters and Brexiteers0 -
Gosh - all they really show is a country split down the middle - if anything worse than 2016, with the two main parties heading to the extremes. It's scary.IanB2 said:
Yes/no questions with no other options would be better presented without the DKs:CarlottaVance said:@Foxy - quote: Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvote
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=19
I think thats what would be called 'a tie'
Revoke - 51% support
Referendum - 51%
No Deal - 46%0 -
Slackbladder said:
That's not true.CarlottaVance said:
That Watson said it, or that its Labour Policy?0 -
6 million sign petition to Revoke A50:0
-
On those numbers if they csnnot vote for Boris Tory members will vote for Raab or even Leadsom insteadOllyT said:
I'm still relying on the good sense of the Tory MPs not to let him get anywhere near the membership run off.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%, Hunt is 4th on 6% and Javid 5th on 5%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html0 -
That it's party policy.CarlottaVance said:Slackbladder said:
That's not true.CarlottaVance said:
That Watson said it, or that its Labour Policy?0 -
I'd think it quite attractive to LabourHYUFD said:
It would be the best option for the country but yes party politics as ever comes firsttlg86 said:
I just can't see it. Labour wouldn't accept an invitation to join one and I reckon there's enough Tories who'd bring down the whole show if it was suggested.HYUFD said:Sir John Major on Marr now urges a cross party national unity government
It gets rid of Brexit, at least temporarily and possibly permanently, with a range of fingerprints on the deed. Their involvement gives their new team some credibility. The Tories will find it more difficult and are more likely to split over it. And being clearly temporary it leads inevitably toward a GE.0 -
Indeed, the long-delayed milestone is finally reached.Ishmael_Z said:6m!!! Oh happy day.
0 -
Leave's irrational loathing of and contempt for democracy is a sight to behold.Benpointer said:
Labour voters who backed Leave will be able to do so again in another referendum so I don't see what the problem is.CarlottaVance said:0 -
May does not want No Deal, if she did we would have left the EU last Friday with No Deal and No extension of Article 50RochdalePioneers said:
The problem is that both May and Corbyn want no deal. Which is why we have to bypass both front benches and take back control. The GNU doesn't have to do much nor last very long- a caretaker government which allows No Deal Brexit to be stopped, gives time for both parties to resolve their splits and then call an election. And if their caretaker programme does a few other useful things like scrap the FTPA and bring in STV then all the better.TheJezziah said:
Also partially in response to Big GNigelb said:
The EU election issue is a distraction, I think. They could be managed much more easily than any alternative deal which required our holding them could be arranged.TheJezziah said:
Just guessing here but on the EU elections point they would presumably only need something passed to hold them if article 50 or something else elections.Nigelb said:
I disclaim any knowledge, but it seems to me that even if a significant majority in the House can agree on a serious alternative to May’s WA, it would need at a minimum to be able to demonstrate to the EU that the majority is sustainable - if there were to be any chance of a further extension from the EU.Big_G_NorthWales said:I am going to pose a question as I do not know the answer
There is a wide held view that no deal will not happen, but that contradicts many including the EU
So, in order for no deal to be stopped
TM WDA is approved before 12th April and if not
I assume legislation is required to pass both the HOC and HOL and needs royal assent
Furthermore, is legislation required for the UK to take part in the EU elections
I am very interested in fellow posters comments and knowledge
Passing legislation into law without the co-operation of the government simply isnt going to happen in the next ten days. And almost certainly isn’t, even with it.
In other words, any significant alternative needs the current government’s active approval, or a new government commanding a majority in the existing parliament, by the end of the week.
All guesswork no knowledge.
My other guess would be along the lines of Edmund, EU doesn't want no deal, euro elections are the only requirement otherwise Ireland has a big problem and the EU have their back. Macron will talk tough but the 27 will come to a position of extension just for Euro elections.
It is the British side that is the bigger potential problems, say if May wanted no deal.0 -
ha Ha Ha , of course not , sensible adult politicians would not suit their purpose. What a brass neck given the Tories inadequacies having been laid bare over the last few years, their total incompetence , uselessness , bribery and begging could not help. You must polish that neck day and night to come up with that cracker.CarlottaVance said:
Don't worry - I doubt they'll ask the nutters from the SNP.malcolmg said:
More moronic bollox from the Tories, too thick to make a decision themselves they now want to bring in the nutters from the other useless parties to make it even worse.HYUFD said:Sir John Major on Marr now urges a cross party national unity government
0 -
Major says there will always be a right and left party in British politics but it must be the centre right that pushes to win and not the far right0
-
I think people are making the mistake of thinking that people favouring No deal are mutually exclusive from those favouring Revoke. I suspect there is substantial crossover.HYUFD said:
46% for No Deal is 1% more than the 45% Yes to independence in Scotland got.IanB2 said:
Yes/no questions with no other options would be better presented without the DKs:CarlottaVance said:@Foxy - quote: Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvote
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=19
I think thats what would be called 'a tie'
Revoke - 51% support
Referendum - 51%
No Deal - 46%
Remain and revoke Article 50 might narrowly win an EUref2 over Leave with No Deal but on those numbers there will be a lot of furious Leave voters and Brexiteers
The explanation? All these people want is it to be over (or at least the current impasse), one way or another. They don't believe no deal will be as disastrous as claimed, and they believe that revoke will just be a return to the status quo.0 -
Indeed. What would this national unity government agree on? They're all still in 'you must do as I say' mode.tlg86 said:
I just can't see it. Labour wouldn't accept an invitation to join one and I reckon there's enough Tories who'd bring down the whole show if it was suggested.HYUFD said:Sir John Major on Marr now urges a cross party national unity government
0 -
What a choice of talent on show there. Must feel great to be a Tory when you see those towering talents limbering up to be top donkey.HYUFD said:
On those numbers if they csnnot vote for Boris Tory members will vote for Raab or even Leadsom insteadOllyT said:
I'm still relying on the good sense of the Tory MPs not to let him get anywhere near the membership run off.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%, Hunt is 4th on 6% and Javid 5th on 5%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html0 -
Yes, Boris is the most charismatic Tory candidate and like Trump a marmite figure, you either love Boris or loathe himWhisperingOracle said:
This is where I think the Shagger's party appeal intersects with a national appeal as mentioned below. Alex is probably correct that Tory members don't see his flaws ; but a number of Tory voters rather than members see his flaws and still support him.HYUFD said:
Tim Bale''s scientific Tory members poll from Sussex Uni last December also had Boris ahead on 20%, Mogg second on 15% and Javid and Davis third on 8%HYUFD said:
Yet the same ConHome polling sample had 60% backing May's Deal last Friday, it is not all hard Brexit diehards. Deltapoll this morning has Boris ahead amongst all voters as next Tory leader, Opinium last night had Boris the only Tory leadership candidate with better positive future PM ratings than Corbyn. The momentum is all with Boris.IanB2 said:
HY continues to present these as "polls" despite the fact that they are not. It's a self-selected sample of a self-selected population.WhisperingOracle said:
Looks like the Shagger is in with a shout.HYUFD said:Boris Johnson top in new Conservative Home Tory members next Tory leader poll on 22% but Dominic Raab surges to 2nd on 18%, Gove is third on 14%
https://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2019/03/next-tory-leader-its-johnson-first-raab-second-gove-third-in-our-first-survey-since-mays-pledge-to-quit.html
My Tory Association AGM last Friday had a straw poll with Boris and Raab the top two so the ConHome poll today entirely in accordance with what I am seeing from Tory members on the ground
https://esrcpartymembersproject.org0 -
Sounds like he has put his pants on back to front. Desperate when they are down to having to bring him out of the crypt , next we will get a vow from him and the great clunking no user.HYUFD said:Major says there will always be a right and left party in British politics but it must be the centre right that pushes to win and not the far right
0 -
I agree with you, it is hard to believe that MPs don't understand the basics of Brexit, that said we should not exclude the possibility that there really are about 400 or so very thick MPs in Parliament. It sure as hell would explain a lot.kle4 said:Thornberry knows it. I dont like to suggest insincerity but more and more on Brexit I cannot believe on a number of issues that so many people do not understand things.
Therefore it is cover for cynical positioning. Davis, Johnson and go are the same so it's not a partisan point. And May and co did it too when trying to change a WA they knew and had said could not be changed.
0 -
He also led his party to its worst defeat for nearly 100 years and was the architect of the failed policy ‘at the heart of Europe without the Euro’.kle4 said:
Well yes, he's a remain supporter.HYUFD said:Major also urges the Deal to be passed with a confirmatory referendum
He’s a great reverse indicator.0 -
Of course it was the Tories who broke up the Lloyd George national Government under Bonar LawIanB2 said:
I'd think it quite attractive to LabourHYUFD said:
It would be the best option for the country but yes party politics as ever comes firsttlg86 said:
I just can't see it. Labour wouldn't accept an invitation to join one and I reckon there's enough Tories who'd bring down the whole show if it was suggested.HYUFD said:Sir John Major on Marr now urges a cross party national unity government
It gets rid of Brexit, at least temporarily and possibly permanently, with a range of fingerprints on the deed. Their involvement gives their new team some credibility. The Tories will find it more difficult and are more likely to split over it. And being clearly temporary it leads inevitably toward a GE.0 -
-
What happens then?Benpointer said:<10 minutes away from reaching 6m signatures:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/241584</p>
Does Theresa May resign?0 -
I think you underestimate at 400, much higher I think.glw said:
I agree with you, it is hard to believe that MPs don't understand the basics of Brexit, that said we should not exclude the possibility that there really are about 400 or so very thick MPs in Parliament. It sure as hell would explain a lot.kle4 said:Thornberry knows it. I dont like to suggest insincerity but more and more on Brexit I cannot believe on a number of issues that so many people do not understand things.
Therefore it is cover for cynical positioning. Davis, Johnson and go are the same so it's not a partisan point. And May and co did it too when trying to change a WA they knew and had said could not be changed.0 -
That is, I think, very true. It also seems to me that her view has genuinely changed since the days of 'No Deal is better than a Bad Deal'.HYUFD said:
May does not want No Deal, if she did we would have left the EU last Friday with No Deal and No extension of Article 50RochdalePioneers said:
The problem is that both May and Corbyn want no deal. Which is why we have to bypass both front benches and take back control. The GNU doesn't have to do much nor last very long- a caretaker government which allows No Deal Brexit to be stopped, gives time for both parties to resolve their splits and then call an election. And if their caretaker programme does a few other useful things like scrap the FTPA and bring in STV then all the better.TheJezziah said:
Also partially in response to Big GNigelb said:
The EU election issue is a distraction, I think. They could be managed much more easily than any alternative deal which required our holding them could be arranged.TheJezziah said:
Just guessing here but on the EU elections point they would presumably only need something passed to hold them if article 50 or something else elections.Nigelb said:
I disclaim any knowledge, but it seems to me that even if a significant majority in the House can agree on a serious alternative to May’s WA, it would need at a minimum to be able to demonstrate to the EU that the majority is sustainable - if there were to be any chance of a further extension from the EU.Big_G_NorthWales said:
Passing legislation into law without the co-operation of the government simply isnt going to happen in the next ten days. And almost certainly isn’t, even with it.
In other words, any significant alternative needs the current government’s active approval, or a new government commanding a majority in the existing parliament, by the end of the week.
All guesswork no knowledge.
My other guess would be along the lines of Edmund, EU doesn't want no deal, euro elections are the only requirement otherwise Ireland has a big problem and the EU have their back. Macron will talk tough but the 27 will come to a position of extension just for Euro elections.
It is the British side that is the bigger potential problems, say if May wanted no deal.
As PM she will have briefings second to noneon the impact of No Deal Brexit and she has clearly decided she cannot put the country through that - even though it has meant back-tracking on one of her earlier grand statements.
Given May's inherent intransigence, that tells me a lot about how dire the impact of a No Deal Brexit would really be.0 -
Only TEN MILLION more and they reach the Remain tally in 2016!WhisperingOracle said:
Indeed, the long-delayed milestone is finally reached.Ishmael_Z said:6m!!! Oh happy day.
0 -
When you say we are growing at a comparable rate to Germany it’s key to remember that the Eurozone is still printing money. Hundreds of billions a year.TheAncientMariner said:
It seems you don't understand - the figures have been selected to show that the UK is doing worse than other countries, and then hang the blame on Brexit - It is true that we are doing relatively worse than the USA - but we are growing at a comparable rate to Germany and Luxembourg. The reason why we are doing worse than the USA is due to Trump's expansionist policies - cutting taxes etc and has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that we held a referendum in 2016.DecrepitJohnL said:
So what? If our economy were in lock-step with the German economy, we'd have been able to join the Euro. It is you who is cherry-picking data. The deviation is real. The interpretation, or if you prefer, the speculation that this is due to Brexit could, however, be wrong.TheAncientMariner said:
It must be totally embarrasing to take the CER graph at face value without delving into the source of their data. This is a fine example of cherry-picking your data.Gardenwalker said:
Nobody is seriously claiming Brexit has aided our economy, and there’s decent enough evidence of resultant economic slowdown, yet for some reason PB’s finest wish to attack this graph?DecrepitJohnL said:
You have misunderstood the CER graph. The comparison is with the actual performance of a basket of other countries used to model our own economy.CD13 said:Mr L,
It shows what it thinks would have happened had we taken a different course. Balls and uncles come to mind.
PS My stories may be sh*te but they are my own work.
It must truly be embarrassing to have voted for Brexit.
Since Jul 2016 the German Economy has grown by 4% https://tradingeconomics.com/germany/gdp-growth The UK by 4.2% https://tradingeconomics.com/united-kingdom/gdp-growth
Without that the economy would be on the floor.
We are growing slowly but without the need for steroids.0 -
0
-
What will make more waves than the petition, currently, is any more polls replicating the Deltapoll results on revocation.0
-
Still TEN MILLION shy of the Remain tally in 2016Casino_Royale said:0 -
-
Indeed. The only counter-argument would be if frantic no deal preparations were going on now and over the next couple of weeks. Some things are being done, for sure, such as the M20 rehearsals, but it doesn't feel to me like the admin side of government is behaving as it would if exit on the 12th were a strong probability.Benpointer said:
That is, I think, very true. It also seems to me that her view has genuinely changed since the days of 'No Deal is better than a Bad Deal'.HYUFD said:
May does not want No Deal, if she did we would have left the EU last Friday with No Deal and No extension of Article 50RochdalePioneers said:
The problem is that both May and Corbyn want no deal. Which is why we have to bypass both front benches and take back control. The GNU doesn't have to do much nor last very long- a caretaker government which allows No Deal Brexit to be stopped, gives time for both parties to resolve their splits and then call an election. And if their caretaker programme does a few other useful things like scrap the FTPA and bring in STV then all the better.TheJezziah said:
Also partially in response to Big GNigelb said:
The EU election issue is a distraction, I think. They could be managed much more easily than any alternative deal which required our holding them could be arranged.TheJezziah said:
Just guessing here but on the EU elections point they would presumably only need something passed to hold them if article 50 or something else elections.Nigelb said:Big_G_NorthWales said:
Passing legislation into law without the co-operation of the government simply isnt going to happen in the next ten days. And almost certainly isn’t, even with it.
In other words, any significant alternative needs the current government’s active approval, or a new government commanding a majority in the existing parliament, by the end of the week.
All guesswork no knowledge.
My other guess would be along the lines of Edmund, EU doesn't want no deal, euro elections are the only requirement otherwise Ireland has a big problem and the EU have their back. Macron will talk tough but the 27 will come to a position of extension just for Euro elections.
It is the British side that is the bigger potential problems, say if May wanted no deal.
As PM she will have briefings second to noneon the impact of No Deal Brexit and she has clearly decided she cannot put the country through that - even though it has meant back-tracking on one of her earlier grand statements.
Given May's inherent intransigence, that tells me a lot about how dire the impact of a No Deal Brexit would really be.0 -
That first sentence is a straightforward lift from a recent PB thread header.IanB2 said:Rawnsley: She got the keys to Number 10 because Tory MPs thought her a safe bet. She’s been anything but.
One of her few friends once told me that Mrs May approached Brexit as if the country had set her a piece of fiendishly difficult homework. The downside of this doggedness has been inflexibility... She didn’t have the largeness of character and the breadth of political skills necessary to handle the vast complexity of the Brexit challenge, but then it is arguable that such a person does not exist.
The Tory party is now preparing to find a new chief for its cannibalistic tribe. It will be convenient for a lot of people, especially those planning to contest for the corroded crown, to cast all the blame for 33 months of unrelenting and still unresolved chaos on the woman who will soon be leaving Number 10. Convenient, but not altogether accurate. The problem with the Conservative party is not Mrs May. The problem with the Conservative party is the Conservative party. The problem with Brexit is not Mrs May. The problem with Brexit is Brexit.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/mar/31/theresa-may-dealt-worst-of-hands-played-it-spectacularly-badly0 -
And both over 50%.CarlottaVance said:
So between Revoke and a LosersVote Referendum its exactly a tie.IanB2 said:
Yes/no questions with no other options would be better presented without the DKs:CarlottaVance said:@Foxy - quote: Revoke now more popular than a #peoplesvote
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112116959599099904?s=19
https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1112117322087567361?s=19
I think thats what would be called 'a tie'
Revoke - 51% support
Referendum - 51%
No Deal - 46%0 -
Only 16.8 MILLION more and Leave reaches its tally in 2016!...Sunil_Prasannan said:
Only TEN MILLION more and they reach the Remain tally in 2016!WhisperingOracle said:
Indeed, the long-delayed milestone is finally reached.Ishmael_Z said:6m!!! Oh happy day.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/2299630 -
Morning all,
Whatever side of the argument we favour there is one thing on which I think we can all agree, it is proving hellish difficult to deliver on the wishes of the British people, as expressed in the Referendum of 2016, that the UK becomes an independent coastal state in charge of its own fish.
Parliament is blocking Leave with a deal. Parliament is blocking Leave without a deal. Ergo Parliament is blocking Leave. Remain then? Nein. Parliament will not Revoke and will not sanction another Referendum. Ergo Parliament is blocking Remain.
Leave or Remain, the binary 2016 choice, both are looking like unicorns.
OK, not to worry, because we can trade in this Parliament for a better model. Have a General Election. Mais non! Parliament blocks this too under the FTPA. We must wait until 2022.
Conclusion?
We need a solution which involves neither leaving nor not leaving the European Union and which lasts until 2022.
I suggest an induced coma.0 -
That's NO DEAL, not LEAVE per seBenpointer said:
Only 16.8 MILLION more and Leave reaches its tally in 2016!...Sunil_Prasannan said:
Only TEN MILLION more and they reach the Remain tally in 2016!WhisperingOracle said:
Indeed, the long-delayed milestone is finally reached.Ishmael_Z said:6m!!! Oh happy day.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/2299630 -
No The Conservative Party is like a cockroach. It will survive armaggedon and then flourish. Minimum low thirties for the Tories after any splits.IanB2 said:
Ok. Making some deductions from the article that would produce something like:CarlottaVance said:
The current parties.IanB2 said:
Hardly decisive, especially with barely half the electorate between them. Where are the other options?CarlottaVance said:‘New Party A’ would emphasise community and society, be happy with current or higher levels of immigration, want more action to tackle climate change, support aid to poorer countries, promote rehabilitation in the criminal justice system, strongly support rights for same-sex couples and favour international co-operation, including the closest possible links with the EU after Brexit. ‘New Party B’ would aim to reduce immigration, take a tougher line on law and order, spend the international aid budget in the UK instead, prefer the UK to act independently with few formal ties to the EU after Brexit, and argue that the threat of climate change had been exaggerated, that traditional values had been wrongly neglected and that the government had become too much of a nanny state. When I asked people how they would vote in an election with these new entrants standing against the current players, the liberal ‘New Party A’ did well, with 24% of the vote, including nearly a third of 2017 Labour voters and nearly half of Lib Dems. But they were pipped at the post by the much more conservative ‘New Party B’, with 27%, including more than four in ten 2017 Tories and nearly half of Leave voters.
http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2019/03/mind-the-gap-why-the-brexit-debacle-has-put-both-labour-and-the-tories-under-threat/
New social conservatives: 27%
New social liberal 24%
Labour around 22%
Conservative around 20%
LibDem around 4%
Others 3%
Under our current voting system that would be a very messy election, impossible to predict.0