politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Sherrod Brown, victor in Ohio last November, looks increasingl
Comments
-
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:0 -
The man asked her for a figure and she said what she said 'I think it is' and then said 'last I saw it was' if the first is a slip of the memory then that is very possible.ydoethur said:
The point is she does it too often. Anyone can make a mistake. That's allowed. She simply plucks figures from the air and doesn't even try to reconcile them. (Epitaph for Corbynism?)TheJezziah said:
If you are talking about the first interview on the video you displayed* then she says I think it is about 50 seats he says it is 125 and then she says it was 100 last time I saw but it is an evolving situation.ydoethur said:
Yes. Because it shows it wasn't a slip of memory.TheJezziah said:
Is that really more disastrous?ydoethur said:TheJezziah said:ydoethur said:TheJezziah said:kinabalu said:@ Cyclefree (re Abbott)
I mean as in my above post neither actually matter that much as the worst that would happen in reality is Hammond or Abbot would leave the interview and find out they were wrong (if the interviewer didn't correct them)
To take the Hammond example we weren't actually going to be £20B off on funding it, he just got the figure wrong in an interview.
Whilst there is something to be said for being sharp in interviews I've never been sure it is the key thing.
Without knowing what she's is actually thinking there could be lots of reasons for this one of which could be a slip of memory, if you have seen a figure (of 100) but can't remember the interviewer giving a figure could trigger your memory.
*which is quite amusing as this first interview had nothing to do with calculations but for some reason the video had a calculator. These right wing racist types are so thick they don't even understand that, quite amusing they claim Abbot is thick when you think about it....
And even Have I Got News For You showed that clip as 'Abbott making another error with numbers.'
This isn't Rory Stewart style making up of numbers to support her case.
Edit: And TBH that wasn't exactly intelligence related either.
She gets laughed at and mocked when she is correct or turns out to be correct. The recent question time where she was laughed at for getting her numbers wrong is the perfect example, it was others who got their numbers wrong. She was also laughed at and mocked for believing Corbyn could turn things around. I think she even said something like within a year and was right when many political watchers included many on PB would have thought she was insane to claim that.
0 -
I like this line.ydoethur said:A sensible person knows their own prejudices and works to overcome them.
Not if the prejudice is against broccoli or corn on the cob, or swords & sorcery, stuff like that, the more of that sort of prejudice the better, but if it relates to people, yes this line applies.
And - sorry for returning to Trump - this is what irks me the most about what is going on with him and his ardent supporters. Far from working to overcome their multiple primitive urges they do the opposite - they wallow in them.0 -
Amazed to see you lot are still posting about Brexit and the idiocy of the political class and not about Denmark's amazing win in the handball world championship -
unlike brexit the time limit wasn't adjusted due to some players wanting longer for their team to work out how to score and everybody agreed that the result was based on who got the most goals; so far Norway haven't requested a replay.
On the other hand the Danish coach had a plan his team supported and none of the danes decided to try and score for the Norwegians because they thought his strategy would mean they wouldn't win by as many goals as they wanted.0 -
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum0 -
I think following the disastrous outcome of the shutdown for Trump, we should also be upping the odds for non-Trump GOPers to win the White House.rcs1000 said:I think Sherrod Brown is a good outside shot for the nomination. However, I think he would be a poor nominee and a terrible president
An interesting name being bandied about a bit locally is Hogan, the GOP governor of deep, deep, deepest blue Maryland. Personally, I don't see how he has a snowball's chance in hell of getting through the GOP primaries, but if he did, and if the Dems end up steering more to the left, it would be a very interesting Presidential election to watch.0 -
Was this the first time handball has been played?kingbongo said:Amazed to see you lot are still posting about Brexit and the idiocy of the political class and not about Denmark's amazing win in the handball world championship -
unlike brexit the time limit wasn't adjusted due to some players wanting longer for their team to work out how to score and everybody agreed that the result was based on who got the most goals; so far Norway haven't requested a replay.
On the other hand the Danish coach had a plan his team supported and none of the danes decided to try and score for the Norwegians because they thought his strategy would mean they wouldn't win by as many goals as they wanted.0 -
I don't think Hugo is a socialist, more like Dickens as someone who believes in noblesse oblige.Endillion said:
The villain is the system though surely, not its representative? Hugo is having a go at a system that destroys a man's life for trying to feed his starving family and won't let him back into society even after serving his sentence, continually pushing him back towards crime. The whole point is that all men have good inside them but circumstances force them to behave like animals, ergo something about socialism.Foxy said:
The story of Valjean is one of repentance and redemption, with Inspector Javert as the unforgiving past that keeps re-appearing. In the end Javert cannot cope when Valjean demonstrates his reformed heart by sparing him.Endillion said:
Interesting. .Foxy said:
I don't think that you are correct.kinabalu said:Apologies 'ydoether', I messed up the quotes, but replying to you about RACISM:
Let me pivot from Diane and take the more general point that you raise.
If a 'person of colour' gets preferential treatment on account of it, it is not IMO racist to point this out.
For example(ish), when I watch a TV crime drama and there is just the one prominent black character in it, I know for a fact that he or she will NOT be the murderer.
Is it racist of me to simply share that with you people on here? No.
But if I continually go on and on and on about it - how PC diversity is just ruining decent television these days - how it's got to one of the very worst things about modern Britain - if, you know, I come over all rod liddle about it, then there's a very good chance that I am (like him) at least a teeny bit racist.
Tricky thing, racism, because it is prevalent yet no-one ever admits to it. If we did an 'are you racist?' survey it would return close to 0% yes - we would think the problem had gone away entirely.
Bit like (with men) 'are you a bad driver?' If we self-assessed that, there would not be any. Not even the Duke.
And yet, as we know, there are loads. Ditto racists.
And some of those racists are also bad drivers, I would imagine.
Any correlation? ... er, steady on! Stop typing now. Don't overdo it.
As ever, playing the villain is more fun, but surely not the sort of "political correctness" that you cite.
I take your point about the system, but Javert is a particularly zealous persecutor, one quite without mercy or understanding. The story is a very Catholic one, with its themes of redemption by a sort of calvary, and the ability of the priests and nuns to see the good in Valjean, and to protect him even when he does not deserve it. In such a Catholic tale, the end of Javert is a mortal sin.
0 -
I believe it is far more sinister than that re Trump (albeit not necessarily for his supporters) - he exploits it and so encourages it.kinabalu said:
I like this line.ydoethur said:A sensible person knows their own prejudices and works to overcome them.
Not if the prejudice is against broccoli or corn on the cob, or swords & sorcery, stuff like that, the more of that sort of prejudice the better, but if it relates to people, yes this line applies.
And - sorry for returning to Trump - this is what irks me the most about what is going on with him and his ardent supporters. Far from working to overcome their multiple primitive urges they do the opposite - they wallow in them.0 -
TheJezziah said:
The man asked her for a figure and she said what she said 'I think it is' and then said 'last I saw it was' if the first is a slip of the memory then that is very possible.
This isn't Rory Stewart style making up of numbers to support her case.
Edit: And TBH that wasn't exactly intelligence related either.
She gets laughed at and mocked when she is correct or turns out to be correct. The recent question time where she was laughed at for getting her numbers wrong is the perfect example, it was others who got their numbers wrong. She was also laughed at and mocked for believing Corbyn could turn things around. I think she even said something like within a year and was right when many political watchers included many on PB would have thought she was insane to claim that.
Stopped clock syndrome. She gets laughed at because she's got a long history of getting things wrong.
Also, you can't seriously be suggesting that she's a dispassionate observer with regards to Corbyn. Personally I lost all vestige of respect for her when their prior relationship was revealed after she'd spent months acting as cheerleader for his leadership campaign.0 -
ha! well it was the first time Denmark's men have been in the final and won - so sort ofRobD said:
Was this the first time handball has been played?kingbongo said:Amazed to see you lot are still posting about Brexit and the idiocy of the political class and not about Denmark's amazing win in the handball world championship -
unlike brexit the time limit wasn't adjusted due to some players wanting longer for their team to work out how to score and everybody agreed that the result was based on who got the most goals; so far Norway haven't requested a replay.
On the other hand the Danish coach had a plan his team supported and none of the danes decided to try and score for the Norwegians because they thought his strategy would mean they wouldn't win by as many goals as they wanted.0 -
A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Ah but that is a classic where the plot is already known (if you know it).Foxy said:I don't think that you are correct. In the current excellent colourblind version of Les Mis on Sunday, the two main villains of the story are played by BME actors, Javert and the Innkeeper. Both very well cast and played IMO.
As ever, playing the villain is more fun, but surely not the sort of "political correctness" that you cite.
I was about to go on to describe the exact sorts of programmes I'm talking about, but then I remembered my own comment about how people who bang on about this are probably racist, so I had better not :-)0 -
You missed out pineapple on pizza and The Last Jedikinabalu said:
I like this line.ydoethur said:A sensible person knows their own prejudices and works to overcome them.
Not if the prejudice is against broccoli or corn on the cob, or swords & sorcery, stuff like that, the more of that sort of prejudice the better, but if it relates to people, yes this line applies.
0 -
Socialist is almost certainly the wrong word, but I'm not sure noblesse oblige covers it either. I suspect Dickens is a tricky comparison point since they were products of very different environments. Certainly Hugo was very much in favour of social reform.Foxy said:
I don't think Hugo is a socialist, more like Dickens as someone who believes in noblesse oblige.
I take your point about the system, but Javert is a particularly zealous persecutor, one quite without mercy or understanding. The story is a very Catholic one, with its themes of redemption by a sort of calvary, and the ability of the priests and nuns to see the good in Valjean, and to protect him even when he does not deserve it. In such a Catholic tale, the end of Javert is a mortal sin.
Happy to accept your point on the Catholicism angle, which I hadn't previously understood - so many thanks.0 -
Les Émergents En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
She gets laughed at because she gets laughed at, the problem is the right wing morons laughing at her are often wrong, they don't realise this though so keep laughing. She does as every politician get things wrong as well.Endillion said:TheJezziah said:
The man asked her for a figure and she said what she said 'I think it is' and then said 'last I saw it was' if the first is a slip of the memory then that is very possible.
This isn't Rory Stewart style making up of numbers to support her case.
Edit: And TBH that wasn't exactly intelligence related either.
She gets laughed at and mocked when she is correct or turns out to be correct. The recent question time where she was laughed at for getting her numbers wrong is the perfect example, it was others who got their numbers wrong. She was also laughed at and mocked for believing Corbyn could turn things around. I think she even said something like within a year and was right when many political watchers included many on PB would have thought she was insane to claim that.
Stopped clock syndrome. She gets laughed at because she's got a long history of getting things wrong.
Also, you can't seriously be suggesting that she's a dispassionate observer with regards to Corbyn. Personally I lost all vestige of respect for her when their prior relationship was revealed after she'd spent months acting as cheerleader for his leadership campaign.
I suppose at least your 2nd paragraph isn't the usual misogynistic/racist line about getting the job because she slept with Corbyn previously.
She is very left wing herself, her Corbyn and other left wingers are all in the same campaign group and have very similar political beliefs, do you have any reason to believe she wouldn't have supported John McDonnell just as much?
I don't think many people interesting in politics would deny that her and Corbyn are similar (and Mcdonnell) which is usually enough for people to cheerlead for each other.0 -
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
True. As a general rule, harmless if not directed against people. Or if done so only joshingly amongst friends.Sean_F said:To be fair, we all have prejudices. That's human. At one end, prejudice is harmless, at the other end, it's murderous.
Although this latter - joshing - I've sometimes seen that cross the line into murky waters.
Most people are fine, of course. One does not want to imply otherwise.0 -
Stewart, Hammond, Boris, Gove, Cummings, May, Letwin, Redwood, all these get laughed at when they make mistakes like this.TheJezziah said:She gets laughed at because she gets laughed at, the problem is the right wing morons laughing at her are often wrong, they don't realise this though so keep laughing. She does as every politician get things wrong as well.
I suppose at least your 2nd paragraph isn't the usual misogynistic/racist line about getting the job because she slept with Corbyn previously.
She is very left wing herself, her Corbyn and other left wingers are all in the same campaign group and have very similar political beliefs, do you have any reason to believe she wouldn't have supported John McDonnell just as much?
I don't think many people interesting in politics would deny that her and Corbyn are similar (and Mcdonnell) which is usually enough for people to cheerlead for each other.
But they don't keep on doing it (well, OK, Gove and Cummings aside) so they don't keep getting laughed at.
While it is true Abbott does come in for a lot of racist and sexist abuse, she also comes in for a lot of stick because she simply isn't very good at what she does. Yet she does at least sometimes seem to try to hide behind her race and her gender to deflect criticism.
As with Israel, which we have discussed before, it then becomes difficult to disentangle where one ends and the other begins.0 -
TBH you generally regard most of those on the left as not very good, although in fairness I have learnt over time that you just generally give spectacularly bad reviews to everyone, everyone seems to come in for harsher criticism (so there is a fairness to it) but harsher still for the left because that isn't where you are politically, which is fair enough. I'll just have to disagree with you that she stands out as worthy of extra criticism, much like the earliest Black footballers she gets judged to a higher standard.ydoethur said:
Stewart, Hammond, Boris, Gove, Cummings, May, Letwin, Redwood, all these get laughed at when they make mistakes like this.TheJezziah said:She gets laughed at because she gets laughed at, the problem is the right wing morons laughing at her are often wrong, they don't realise this though so keep laughing. She does as every politician get things wrong as well.
I suppose at least your 2nd paragraph isn't the usual misogynistic/racist line about getting the job because she slept with Corbyn previously.
She is very left wing herself, her Corbyn and other left wingers are all in the same campaign group and have very similar political beliefs, do you have any reason to believe she wouldn't have supported John McDonnell just as much?
I don't think many people interesting in politics would deny that her and Corbyn are similar (and Mcdonnell) which is usually enough for people to cheerlead for each other.
But they don't keep on doing it (well, OK, Gove and Cummings aside) so they don't keep getting laughed at.
While it is true Abbott does come in for a lot of racist and sexist abuse, she also comes in for a lot of stick because she simply isn't very good at what she does. Yet she does at least sometimes seem to try to hide behind her race and her gender to deflect criticism.
As with Israel, which we have discussed before, it then becomes difficult to disentangle where one ends and the other begins.0 -
Well, they're not.TheJezziah said:
TBH you generally regard most of those on the left as not very good.ydoethur said:
Stewart, Hammond, Boris, Gove, Cummings, May, Letwin, Redwood, all these get laughed at when they make mistakes like this.TheJezziah said:She gets laughed at because she gets laughed at, the problem is the right wing morons laughing at her are often wrong, they don't realise this though so keep laughing. She does as every politician get things wrong as well.
I suppose at least your 2nd paragraph isn't the usual misogynistic/racist line about getting the job because she slept with Corbyn previously.
She is very left wing herself, her Corbyn and other left wingers are all in the same campaign group and have very similar political beliefs, do you have any reason to believe she wouldn't have supported John McDonnell just as much?
I don't think many people interesting in politics would deny that her and Corbyn are similar (and Mcdonnell) which is usually enough for people to cheerlead for each other.
But they don't keep on doing it (well, OK, Gove and Cummings aside) so they don't keep getting laughed at.
While it is true Abbott does come in for a lot of racist and sexist abuse, she also comes in for a lot of stick because she simply isn't very good at what she does. Yet she does at least sometimes seem to try to hide behind her race and her gender to deflect criticism.
As with Israel, which we have discussed before, it then becomes difficult to disentangle where one ends and the other begins.0 -
Yes, I remember the Hammond gaffe. Did not bother me one iota.TheJezziah said:You have had plenty of footballers from the past talking about similar experiences, even aside from the overt racism there was always just extra demands on them and people will to pull them up twice as much over the slightest mistake, the crowd was never as forgiving with the Black players. It is why Diane gets claimed as some kind of moron who doesn't understand numbers and the idea successfully catches when she makes a single mistake on police numbers in the build up to the election.
I think it was around the same time Hammond underestimated HS2 by about £20B, a far bigger and more serious error than Abbotts.
The stupid thing is neither of those were actually based on maths ability, neither person was presented sums they had to figure out to get the right answer. The problem was memory. Which is kind of funny that you have some right wingers laughing at her for not being good at numeracy and variations on that when they aren't even smart enough to figure out her memory was the issue in that incident.
I bet Diane could figure that out, she is a bit smarter than most of her critics in fairness...
Football is an interesting case study in another respect. The playing side is a rare example (these days in this country) of a pure meritocracy.
No bias whatsoever towards privately educated white people.
Reason? Because there's no hiding place. It really is about ability.0 -
Separateurs!ydoethur said:
Les Émergents En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Of course you are right. He is playing them for suckers. And succeeding, one has to say, because to a great extent they are. But hopefully not sufficiently so and not in sufficient numbers to get him a 2nd term.MTimT said:I believe it is far more sinister than that re Trump (albeit not necessarily for his supporters) - he exploits it and so encourages it.
0 -
My vest is yellower than yours ?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Mostly agree.ydoethur said:
Stewart, Hammond, Boris, Gove, Cummings, May, Letwin, Redwood, all these get laughed at when they make mistakes like this.TheJezziah said:She gets laughed at because she gets laughed at, the problem is the right wing morons laughing at her are often wrong, they don't realise this though so keep laughing. She does as every politician get things wrong as well.
I suppose at least your 2nd paragraph isn't the usual misogynistic/racist line about getting the job because she slept with Corbyn previously.
She is very left wing herself, her Corbyn and other left wingers are all in the same campaign group and have very similar political beliefs, do you have any reason to believe she wouldn't have supported John McDonnell just as much?
I don't think many people interesting in politics would deny that her and Corbyn are similar (and Mcdonnell) which is usually enough for people to cheerlead for each other.
But they don't keep on doing it (well, OK, Gove and Cummings aside) so they don't keep getting laughed at.
While it is true Abbott does come in for a lot of racist and sexist abuse, she also comes in for a lot of stick because she simply isn't very good at what she does. Yet she does at least sometimes seem to try to hide behind her race and her gender to deflect criticism.
As with Israel, which we have discussed before, it then becomes difficult to disentangle where one ends and the other begins.
But, in a way, Dianne *is* good at what she does. She has been a prominent public figure for 30 years, that’s very good going.0 -
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Not new news.williamglenn said:
Actually what he says make sense.
Until you try to translate it into actual policy.0 -
And thus will Corbyn also try to avoid facing the actual decision before us now as well. It's why I presume enough will back the Cooper plan, it gives them more time to avoid taking a stance on the actually available options.williamglenn said:0 -
Feels like with all this splitting that Macron has ridden this one out.williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?0 -
She may well be a fine local MP. I have no confidence in her abilities as a putative Home Secretary.Gardenwalker said:
Mostly agree.ydoethur said:
Stewart, Hammond, Boris, Gove, Cummings, May, Letwin, Redwood, all these get laughed at when they make mistakes like this.TheJezziah said:She gets laughed at because she gets laughed at, the problem is the right wing morons laughing at her are often wrong, they don't realise this though so keep laughing. She does as every politician get things wrong as well.
I suppose at least your 2nd paragraph isn't the usual misogynistic/racist line about getting the job because she slept with Corbyn previously.
She is very left wing herself, her Corbyn and other left wingers are all in the same campaign group and have very similar political beliefs, do you have any reason to believe she wouldn't have supported John McDonnell just as much?
I don't think many people interesting in politics would deny that her and Corbyn are similar (and Mcdonnell) which is usually enough for people to cheerlead for each other.
But they don't keep on doing it (well, OK, Gove and Cummings aside) so they don't keep getting laughed at.
While it is true Abbott does come in for a lot of racist and sexist abuse, she also comes in for a lot of stick because she simply isn't very good at what she does. Yet she does at least sometimes seem to try to hide behind her race and her gender to deflect criticism.
As with Israel, which we have discussed before, it then becomes difficult to disentangle where one ends and the other begins.
But, in a way, Dianne *is* good at what she does. She has been a prominent public figure for 30 years, that’s very good going.0 -
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
Kidnapping Macron's wife...with chips?Omnium said:
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?0 -
It's currently 99p on Kindle if you're tempted. (I haven't read it.)Benpointer said:
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
Perhaps somebody can enlighten me with McCluskey's salary...williamglenn said:0 -
In the end, the ideological socialists won.Recidivist said:
So we hear, but it we heard the same about die hard ideological socialists in the Labour Party in the eighties. But it turned out they were flexible enough to shift to a more elector friendly position when the right leader turned up. And try the thought experiment of how a narrow remain win would have affected the Tories under Cameron. I have a feeling a lot of them would have decided that the EU was not so bad after all.Sean_F said:
The eurosceptics are the root and marrow of the Conservative Party. You might just as well wish for the removal of monarchists or capitalists from the Conservatives.Recidivist said:
We are going to rejoin. Why would the terms be punitive? What even is the meaning of punitive in this context? A lot of people on this very forum object to things that others on it regard as benefits.notme2 said:
We aint going back in if we leave. The best remainers could hope for would be norway model with a swiss style process of step by step opt into different institutions etc.Sandpit said:
The EU have said that they’d need to follow article 49 which covers entry. The difficult bits would be how we could rejoin while keeping our opn the EU side would require unanimity, and there would need to be constitutional referenda in several member states in order to ratify.Chris said:
Yage.williamglenn said:
The WA itself, no, because by definition once we're out, the treaties will cease to apply and wea full ratification by the EU27 member states.Chris said:
ed.notme2 said:
If we are going to jump off the cliff of a no deal, unless a whole series of mini agreements are put through before hand theres no coming back. The train wreck will unfold, and theres little you can do to stop it.Chris said:
Hmm.tpfkar said:
I'm having more and more moments where I wish we could have no deal for a fortnight, I just wonder whether we have to fall over the cliff edge to believe it's real and to discredit those who've been tempting us over.
BuU?
If we rejected our membership on the current dreadful deal, how likely are we to re-enter on what would be a punitive deal?
We can't to back to 2016, let alone 1971. Our new membership will be different to the one we've left behind. I'm hoping we'll finally start playing a full positive role and reaping the full benefits. I think once we've got the euroskeptics plain sailing.
The Vicar of Bray would be at home in both the main parties.
0 -
You can choose not to have the chips too.viewcode said:
Kidnapping Macron's wife...with chips?Omnium said:
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?0 -
If Alfred the Great can use less in such a situation I feel confident that I can too.ydoethur said:
No.Alistair said:
I hope you are not getting annoyed about any purported breaking of a completely bogus and utterly made up gramatical "rule" that is utterly unsupported by any contemporary analysis.ydoethur said:
AAAAAAAARGHHHHH!Alistair said:
I was specifically talking about Wisconsin with the less votes comment.HYUFD said:
No he did not get fewer votes, Trump got more votes than Romney in Iowa and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Ohio (fractionally less in Wisconsin) ie the key Midwestern and rustbelt swing states where it mattered in order to win the Electoral College. Even if Romney got a higher voteshare in the popular vote nationwide than Trump (but still fewer votes than Trump nationwide) the popular vote does not determine the Presidency, the Electoral College doesAlistair said:
He got less votes than Romney. He got less votes.HYUFD said:
Trump won states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for the first time for the Republicans since 1988 because he brought in the type of blue collar Democrat who had not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since the Reagan era.Alistair said:I'm loving the idea that Trump, winning less votes than Romney, has created a massive bulwark for the GOP by barley moving their vote share.
Let us ignore the elephant in the room of Hillary shedding 10 percentage points of the Dem vote.
Hillary lost the states by moving backwards.
Sir, do you order pineapple on pizza while watching The Last Jedi?
I'm getting annoyed at you using 'less' when it should be 'fewer!'0 -
Whereas, it turns out that d'Ancona would have been on the other side.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum0 -
There was a science fiction novel in this decade or thereabouts whose setting was a German dominated European mainland with the UK outside it. Can anybody enlighten me? Not Fatherland nor The Man in the High Castle.Benpointer said:
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
Aelfred didn't speak English!Alistair said:
If Alfred the Great can use less in such a situation I feel confident that I can too.ydoethur said:
No.Alistair said:
I hope you are not getting annoyed about any purported breaking of a completely bogus and utterly made up gramatical "rule" that is utterly unsupported by any contemporary analysis.ydoethur said:
AAAAAAAARGHHHHH!Alistair said:
I was specifically talking about Wisconsin with the less votes comment.HYUFD said:
No he did not get fewer votes, Trump got more votes than Romney in Iowa and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Ohio (fractionally less in Wisconsin) ie the key Midwestern and rustbelt swing states where it mattered in order to win the Electoral College. Even if Romney got a higher voteshare in the popular vote nationwide than Trump (but still fewer votes than Trump nationwide) the popular vote does not determine the Presidency, the Electoral College doesAlistair said:
He got less votes than Romney. He got less votes.HYUFD said:
Trump won states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for the first time for the Republicans since 1988 because he brought in the type of blue collar Democrat who had not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since the Reagan era.Alistair said:I'm loving the idea that Trump, winning less votes than Romney, has created a massive bulwark for the GOP by barley moving their vote share.
Let us ignore the elephant in the room of Hillary shedding 10 percentage points of the Dem vote.
Hillary lost the states by moving backwards.
Sir, do you order pineapple on pizza while watching The Last Jedi?
I'm getting annoyed at you using 'less' when it should be 'fewer!'0 -
So kidnapping Macron's wife, hold the chips.Omnium said:
You can choose not to have the chips too.viewcode said:
Kidnapping Macron's wife...with chips?Omnium said:
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?
Weirdest French Restaurant Evah.0 -
Non - avec le nez de la loutre.Omnium said:
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?0 -
Wait, you are saying the king credited with the promotion of the English language didn't do English? Its a view I suppose.ydoethur said:
Aelfred didn't speak English!Alistair said:
If Alfred the Great can use less in such a situation I feel confident that I can too.ydoethur said:
No.Alistair said:
I hope you are not getting annoyed about any purported breaking of a completely bogus and utterly made up gramatical "rule" that is utterly unsupported by any contemporary analysis.ydoethur said:
AAAAAAAARGHHHHH!Alistair said:
I was specifically talking about Wisconsin with the less votes comment.HYUFD said:
No he did not get fewer votes, Trump got more votes than Romney in Iowa and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Ohio (fractionally less in Wisconsin) ie the key Midwestern and rustbelt swing states where it mattered in order to win the Electoral College. Even if Romney got a higher voteshare in the popular vote nationwide than Trump (but still fewer votes than Trump nationwide) the popular vote does not determine the Presidency, the Electoral College doesAlistair said:
He got less votes than Romney. He got less votes.HYUFD said:
Trump won states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for the first time for the Republicans since 1988 because he brought in the type of blue collar Democrat who had not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since the Reagan era.Alistair said:I'm loving the idea that Trump, winning less votes than Romney, has created a massive bulwark for the GOP by barley moving their vote share.
Let us ignore the elephant in the room of Hillary shedding 10 percentage points of the Dem vote.
Hillary lost the states by moving backwards.
Sir, do you order pineapple on pizza while watching The Last Jedi?
I'm getting annoyed at you using 'less' when it should be 'fewer!'
On the subject of the ridiculous prescriptive grammar rule the Wikipedia article is actually surprisingly good and well referenced. And shows how utterly bogus it is.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fewer_versus_less0 -
Not Dominion I guess since in that the UK was in supine vassalage to the greater Reich?viewcode said:
There was a science fiction novel in this decade or thereabouts whose setting was a German dominated European mainland with the UK outside it. Can anybody enlighten me? Not Fatherland nor The Man in the High Castle.Benpointer said:
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
I'm always of the view that if the meaning was perfectly well understood what harm is done by using language in a particular way. There are times when the words could not substitute for each other, but most of the time they can. That being the case, why do people get so upset? It's self evidently not about clarity of language, so what is it about?Alistair said:
Wait, you are saying the king credited with the promotion of the English language didn't do English? Its a view I suppose.ydoethur said:
Aelfred didn't speak English!Alistair said:
If Alfred the Great can use less in such a situation I feel confident that I can too.ydoethur said:
No.Alistair said:
I hope you are not getting annoyed about any purported breaking of a completely bogus and utterly made up gramatical "rule" that is utterly unsupported by any contemporary analysis.ydoethur said:
AAAAAAAARGHHHHH!Alistair said:
I was specifically talking about Wisconsin with the less votes comment.HYUFD said:
No he did not get fewer votes, Trump got more votes than Romney in Iowa and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Ohio (fractionally less in Wisconsin) ie the key Midwestern and rustbelt swing states where it mattered in order to win the Electoral College. Even if Romney got a higher voteshare in the popular vote nationwide than Trump (but still fewer votes than Trump nationwide) the popular vote does not determine the Presidency, the Electoral College doesAlistair said:
He got less votes than Romney. He got less votes.HYUFD said:
Trump won states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for the first time for the Republicans since 1988 because he brought in the type of blue collar Democrat who had not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since the Reagan era.Alistair said:I'm loving the idea that Trump, winning less votes than Romney, has created a massive bulwark for the GOP by barley moving their vote share.
Let us ignore the elephant in the room of Hillary shedding 10 percentage points of the Dem vote.
Hillary lost the states by moving backwards.
Sir, do you order pineapple on pizza while watching The Last Jedi?
I'm getting annoyed at you using 'less' when it should be 'fewer!'
On the subject of the ridiculous prescriptive grammar rule the Wikipedia article is actually surprisingly good and well referenced. And shows how utterly bogus it is.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fewer_versus_less0 -
Boite les sugestions ces't pas! Gouverneur!viewcode said:
So kidnapping Macron's wife, hold the chips.Omnium said:
You can choose not to have the chips too.viewcode said:
Kidnapping Macron's wife...with chips?Omnium said:
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?
Weirdest French Restaurant Evah.0 -
My god, do y'know I think it is! I was leafing thru it in a bookshop some years ago but did not buy it because money. I do remember the map inside the front cover and such a map occurs in Dominion. Well done you!Theuniondivvie said:
Not Dominion I guess since in that the UK was in supine vassalage to the greater Reich?viewcode said:
There was a science fiction novel in this decade or thereabouts whose setting was a German dominated European mainland with the UK outside it. Can anybody enlighten me? Not Fatherland nor The Man in the High Castle.Benpointer said:
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!Alistair said:
Wait, you are saying the king credited with the promotion of the English language didn't do English? Its a view I suppose.ydoethur said:
Aelfred didn't speak English!Alistair said:
If Alfred the Great can use less in such a situation I feel confident that I can too.ydoethur said:
No.Alistair said:
I hope you are not getting annoyed about any purported breaking of a completely bogus and utterly made up gramatical "rule" that is utterly unsupported by any contemporary analysis.ydoethur said:
AAAAAAAARGHHHHH!Alistair said:
I was specifically talking about Wisconsin with the less votes comment.HYUFD said:
No he did not get fewer votes, Trump got more votes than Romney in Iowa and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Ohio (fractionally less in Wisconsin) ie the key Midwestern and rustbelt swing states where it mattered in order to win the Electoral College. Even if Romney got a higher voteshare in the popular vote nationwide than Trump (but still fewer votes than Trump nationwide) the popular vote does not determine the Presidency, the Electoral College doesAlistair said:
He got less votes than Romney. He got less votes.HYUFD said:
Trump won states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for the first time for the Republicans since 1988 because he brought in the type of blue collar Democrat who had not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since the Reagan era.Alistair said:I'm loving the idea that Trump, winning less votes than Romney, has created a massive bulwark for the GOP by barley moving their vote share.
Let us ignore the elephant in the room of Hillary shedding 10 percentage points of the Dem vote.
Hillary lost the states by moving backwards.
Sir, do you order pineapple on pizza while watching The Last Jedi?
I'm getting annoyed at you using 'less' when it should be 'fewer!'
On the subject of the ridiculous prescriptive grammar rule the Wikipedia article is actually surprisingly good and well referenced. And shows how utterly bogus it is.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fewer_versus_less
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...0 -
Kidnapping Macron's wife would doubtless be a burger...viewcode said:
So kidnapping Macron's wife, hold the chips.Omnium said:
You can choose not to have the chips too.viewcode said:
Kidnapping Macron's wife...with chips?Omnium said:
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?
Weirdest French Restaurant Evah.0 -
It's about what people think grammar is. Prescritivists think grammar is a Platonic set of rules that sprang from the ether fully formed that language use must adhere to.kle4 said:
I'm always of the view that if the meaning was perfectly well understood what harm is done by using language in a particular way. There are times when the words could not substitute for each other, but most of the time they can. That being the case, why do people get so upset? It's self evidently not about clarity of language, so what is it about?
Actual people who study language know that grammar is the study of language as it is used.
It's about gate keeping and feeling superior0 -
Le sange. Est. Dans. L'arbre.Omnium said:
Boite les sugestions ces't pas! Gouverneur!viewcode said:
So kidnapping Macron's wife, hold the chips.Omnium said:
You can choose not to have the chips too.viewcode said:
Kidnapping Macron's wife...with chips?Omnium said:
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?
Weirdest French Restaurant Evah.0 -
Everybody knows from movies that the Romans spoke English, with regional British accents as appropriate.ydoethur said:
He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!Alistair said:
Wait, you are saying the king credited with the promotion of the English language didn't do English? Its a view I suppose.ydoethur said:
Aelfred didn't speak English!Alistair said:
If Alfred the Great can use less in such a situation I feel confident that I can too.ydoethur said:
No.Alistair said:
I hope you are not getting annoyed about any purported breaking of a completely bogus and utterly made up gramatical "rule" that is utterly unsupported by any contemporary analysis.ydoethur said:
AAAAAAAARGHHHHH!Alistair said:
I was specifically talking about Wisconsin with the less votes comment.HYUFD said:
No he did not get fewer votes, Trump got more votes than Romney in Iowa and Michigan and Pennsylvania and Ohio (fractionally less in Wisconsin) ie the key Midwestern and rustbelt swing states where it mattered in order to win the Electoral College. Even if Romney got a higher voteshare in the popular vote nationwide than Trump (but still fewer votes than Trump nationwide) the popular vote does not determine the Presidency, the Electoral College doesAlistair said:
He got less votes than Romney. He got less votes.HYUFD said:
Trump won states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for the first time for the Republicans since 1988 because he brought in the type of blue collar Democrat who had not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since the Reagan era.Alistair said:I'm loving the idea that Trump, winning less votes than Romney, has created a massive bulwark for the GOP by barley moving their vote share.
Let us ignore the elephant in the room of Hillary shedding 10 percentage points of the Dem vote.
Hillary lost the states by moving backwards.
Sir, do you order pineapple on pizza while watching The Last Jedi?
I'm getting annoyed at you using 'less' when it should be 'fewer!'
On the subject of the ridiculous prescriptive grammar rule the Wikipedia article is actually surprisingly good and well referenced. And shows how utterly bogus it is.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fewer_versus_less
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...0 -
Inferior to Fatherland & SS-GB I thought. I may be prejudiced because of a weird, semi-deranged rant against the SNP at the end of the book, but I don't think that's the reason.viewcode said:
My god, do y'know I think it is! I was leafing thru it in a bookshop some years ago but did not buy it because money. I do remember the map inside the front cover and such a map occurs in Dominion. Well done you!Theuniondivvie said:
Not Dominion I guess since in that the UK was in supine vassalage to the greater Reich?viewcode said:
There was a science fiction novel in this decade or thereabouts whose setting was a German dominated European mainland with the UK outside it. Can anybody enlighten me? Not Fatherland nor The Man in the High Castle.Benpointer said:
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
Not that long ago, there was a crank conspiracy theorist called Dorothy Murdoch who claimed that Jesus and Ra were the same person because Ra was the Sun God and Jesus was the Son of God.kle4 said:
Everybody knows from movies that the Romans spoke English, with regional British accents as appropriate.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
She didn't seem to spot the minor problem that neither culture spoke English...0 -
Now you're getting to specialist territory.(As you may have guessed, I don't speak any French. Aber mein Deutsch ist Zuberflutewunderbar!viewcode said:
Le sange. Est. Dans. L'arbre.Omnium said:
Boite les sugestions ces't pas! Gouverneur!viewcode said:
So kidnapping Macron's wife, hold the chips.Omnium said:
You can choose not to have the chips too.viewcode said:
Kidnapping Macron's wife...with chips?Omnium said:
Bon!ydoethur said:
Nous allons kidnapper la femme de Macron, émettre des demandes.viewcode said:
Um...(bluffs it)...oui?ydoethur said:
Campagne Gascogne Libre?viewcode said:
Non. Les Gilets Jaune aux Judee Populaire. Les splitteurs.williamglenn said:
Les Gilets Jaunes de Judée.ydoethur said:
Les Émergens En Marche?williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/1089593953232605184
Avec frittes?
Weirdest French Restaurant Evah.0 -
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.0 -
The Jesus Mythicists are very odd.ydoethur said:
Not that long ago, there was a crank conspiracy theorist called Dorothy Murdoch who claimed that Jesus and Ra were the same person because Ra was the Sun God and Jesus was the Son of God.kle4 said:
Everybody knows from movies that the Romans spoke English, with regional British accents as appropriate.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
She didn't seem to spot the minor problem that neither culture spoke English...0 -
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
Richard Carrier is the funniest, although in the mythicist field I gather his mathematics (confusing frequency and probability) is his real weakness. In history, his most serious fraud was probably his 2003 work on Hitler, which claimed among other things that Irving was not a Holocaust denier.Sean_F said:
The Jesus Mythicists are very odd.ydoethur said:
Not that long ago, there was a crank conspiracy theorist called Dorothy Murdoch who claimed that Jesus and Ra were the same person because Ra was the Sun God and Jesus was the Son of God.kle4 said:
Everybody knows from movies that the Romans spoke English, with regional British accents as appropriate.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
She didn't seem to spot the minor problem that neither culture spoke English...
But I loved his libel action. The surreal way he tried to prove he wasn't a serial sexual harasser by publishing emails where he serially sexually harassed a number of different women before the judge accused him of lying to a court anyway was just hilarious.
I shouldn't laugh I suppose, but the tin-eared nature of that was bizarre.0 -
They did the last time I was there.ydoethur said:You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
0 -
Both books have an inherent problem: the status quo postbellum is retained, as neither protagonist can overthrow the established Nazi state. So they both kind of peter out. However I enjoyed both and now I can afford books I'll see if Waterstones can get Dominion for me.Theuniondivvie said:
Inferior to Fatherland & SS-GB I thought. I may be prejudiced because of a weird, semi-deranged rant against the SNP at the end of the book, but I don't think that's the reason.viewcode said:
My god, do y'know I think it is! I was leafing thru it in a bookshop some years ago but did not buy it because money. I do remember the map inside the front cover and such a map occurs in Dominion. Well done you!Theuniondivvie said:
Not Dominion I guess since in that the UK was in supine vassalage to the greater Reich?viewcode said:
There was a science fiction novel in this decade or thereabouts whose setting was a German dominated European mainland with the UK outside it. Can anybody enlighten me? Not Fatherland nor The Man in the High Castle.Benpointer said:
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
You were in Ancient Rome?williamglenn said:
They did the last time I was there.ydoethur said:You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
I'm reminded of a friend who wrote a doctoral thesis on the Roman Army. His Learning Support Worker, in reading through, changed every instance of 'Roman' to 'Italian.'0 -
Fintan O'Toole's book on Brexit, 'Heroic Failure', talks about how the themes of SS-GB and Fatherland play a role in the Brexiteer psyche. Nicholas Ridley said he'd prefer to be invaded than get subsumed into the EU because at least there'd be "the chance to fight back".viewcode said:
Both books have an inherent problem: the status quo postbellum is retained, as neither protagonist can overthrow the established Nazi state. So they both kind of peter out. However I enjoyed both and now I can afford books I'll see if Waterstones can get Dominion for me.Theuniondivvie said:
Inferior to Fatherland & SS-GB I thought. I may be prejudiced because of a weird, semi-deranged rant against the SNP at the end of the book, but I don't think that's the reason.viewcode said:
My god, do y'know I think it is! I was leafing thru it in a bookshop some years ago but did not buy it because money. I do remember the map inside the front cover and such a map occurs in Dominion. Well done you!Theuniondivvie said:
Not Dominion I guess since in that the UK was in supine vassalage to the greater Reich?viewcode said:
There was a science fiction novel in this decade or thereabouts whose setting was a German dominated European mainland with the UK outside it. Can anybody enlighten me? Not Fatherland nor The Man in the High Castle.Benpointer said:
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
If I recall correctly, when Catholic services were held in Latin, the pronounciation in France was different to the pronounciation in Quebec, as one was pronounced in a similar way to modern Italian and one in what was believed to be how the Romans pronounced it. Happy to be corrected if wrong.williamglenn said:
They did the last time I was there.ydoethur said:You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
0 -
Indeed.williamglenn said:
Fintan O'Toole's book on Brexit, 'Heroic Failure', talks how the themes of SS-GB and Fatherland play a role in the Brexiteer psyche. Nicholas Ridley said he'd prefer to be invaded than get subsumed into the EU because at least there'd be "the chance to fight back".viewcode said:
Both books have an inherent problem: the status quo postbellum is retained, as neither protagonist can overthrow the established Nazi state. So they both kind of peter out. However I enjoyed both and now I can afford books I'll see if Waterstones can get Dominion for me.Theuniondivvie said:
Inferior to Fatherland & SS-GB I thought. I may be prejudiced because of a weird, semi-deranged rant against the SNP at the end of the book, but I don't think that's the reason.viewcode said:
My god, do y'know I think it is! I was leafing thru it in a bookshop some years ago but did not buy it because money. I do remember the map inside the front cover and such a map occurs in Dominion. Well done you!Theuniondivvie said:
Not Dominion I guess since in that the UK was in supine vassalage to the greater Reich?viewcode said:
There was a science fiction novel in this decade or thereabouts whose setting was a German dominated European mainland with the UK outside it. Can anybody enlighten me? Not Fatherland nor The Man in the High Castle.Benpointer said:
According to Wiki, in the novel Roberts had the 'status quo' side losing a 2015 referendum by 51.86% to 48.14% - incredibly close to the 51.89% to 48.11% result of the actual EU Ref.williamglenn said:
In Andrew Roberts' dystopian novel about Britain under the yoke of the United States of Europe, Matthew D'Ancona is a member of the underground resistance along with Iain Duncan Smith.Gardenwalker said:
Brother D’Ancona speaks to my condition.alex. said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aachen_Memorandum
The winning side is later found to have committed fraud apparently - fancy that!
I am usually a fan of alternative histories but I think I'll give this one a miss, especially as the author himself says of the book "I failed so badly on all levels that I now beg friends not to read it" - which probably shows a level of honesty beyond that which his publisher would wish for.0 -
Did they? Or was it just a choice between a candidate who only appealed to a limited section of the electorate and a group of people who didn't appeal to anybody.Sean_F said:
In the end, the ideological socialists won.Recidivist said:
So we hear, but it we heard the same about die hard ideological socialists in the Labour Party in the eighties. But it turned out they were flexible enough to shift to a more elector friendly position when the right leader turned up. And try the thought experiment of how a narrow remain win would have affected the Tories under Cameron. I have a feeling a lot of them would have decided that the EU was not so bad after all.Sean_F said:
The eurosceptics are the root and marrow of the Conservative Party. You might just as well wish for the removal of monarchists or capitalists from the Conservatives.Recidivist said:
We are going to rejoin. Why would the terms be punitive? What even is the meaning of punitive in this context? A lot of people on this very forum object to things that others on it regard as benefits.notme2 said:
We aint going back in if we leave. The best remainers could hope for would be norway model with a swiss style process of step by step opt into different institutions etc.Sandpit said:
The EU have said that they’d .Chris said:
Yage.williamglenn said:
The WA itself, no, because by definition once we're out, the treaties will cease to apply and wea full ratification by the EU27 member states.Chris said:
ed.notme2 said:
If we are going to jump off the cliff of a no deal, unless a whole series of mini agreements are put through before hand theres no coming back. The train wreck will unfold, and theres little you can do to stop it.Chris said:
Hmm.tpfkar said:
I'm having more and more moments where I wish we could have no deal for a fortnight, I just wonder whether we have to fall over the cliff edge to believe it's real and to discredit those who've been tempting us over.
BuU?
If we rejected our membership on the current dreadful deal, how likely are we to re-enter on what would be a punitive deal?
We can't to back to 2016, let alone 1971. Our new membership will be different to the one we've left behind. I'm hoping we'll finally start playing a full positive role and reaping the full benefits. I think once we've got the euroskeptics plain sailing.
The Vicar of Bray would be at home in both the main parties.0 -
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
Only lazy b'stards use apostrophes anyway though.Endillion said:
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
Don't show them medieval latin texts - I've even seen anglo saxon runes crop up in some of them.Endillion said:
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
And bloody thorns get everywhere.kle4 said:
Don't show them medieval latin texts - I've even seen anglo saxon runes crop up in some of them.Endillion said:
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
They really are cnuts.ydoethur said:
Only lazy b'stards use apostrophes anyway though.Endillion said:
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
But the tide will turn!!!Theuniondivvie said:
They really are cnuts.ydoethur said:
Only lazy b'stards use apostrophes anyway though.Endillion said:
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)
0 -
I'm saying, and hold onto your hat here, there are no rules.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)
No one sat down and said, here are the rules of Old English, everyone must now follow them. They didn't update the rule book and say, everyone has to shift vowels, they didn't call a stopping point and say " throw the Old English book away, we are mobi g to English v2 which we will call Middle English. English simply evolved changed and adapted over time without any central guiding force.
If you wish 'rules' of grammar can be derived by studying language as it is used but the 'rules' of English as observed, as it is actually used, has absolutely hee-haw to say about fewer and less. Except that less is perfectly understandable in almost all sirltuations so people should chill out.0 -
Blimey, I can't imagine people trying to hide their poshness.
Many public-school boys deliberately speak in slang with an Estuary accent, even when they grow up, because “being posh these days is not a good thing”, according to the former headmaster of one of Britain’s top schools.
Barnaby Lenon, former head of Harrow School whose alumni include Winston Churchill and Benedict Cumberbatch, said: “There has long been a tendency for schoolchildren at private schools to adopt their own language and certainly with an emphasis on mockney.
“It continues into adult life. George Osborne and Tony Blair are both prone to lapse into Estuary English so they resemble the Kray brothers rather more than the private school background they come from.”
Osborne went to St Paul’s School in west London and Blair to Fettes College in Edinburgh.
“Remember the Old Etonian Prince William saying, ‘I need to check this with the missus.’”
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/eton-and-arrow-boys-have-gone-mockney-sl9n950cz0 -
On topic, I assume this has been discussed?
If it happens, many of us might just die from eating too much popcorn.
Roger Stone opens door to cooperating with Mueller after dramatic predawn arrest
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/roger-stone-appears-to-open-door-to-cooperating-with-mueller-after-dramatic-predawn-arrest0 -
There's Nor way that will happen.ydoethur said:
But the tide will turn!!!Theuniondivvie said:
They really are cnuts.ydoethur said:
Only lazy b'stards use apostrophes anyway though.Endillion said:
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
https://twitter.com/jules_su/status/1089506535095586817TheScreamingEagles said:On topic, I assume this has been discussed?
If it happens, many of us might just die from eating too much popcorn.
Roger Stone opens door to cooperating with Mueller after dramatic predawn arrest
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/roger-stone-appears-to-open-door-to-cooperating-with-mueller-after-dramatic-predawn-arrest0 -
Dear heaven. You really are beyond redemption.Alistair said:
I'm saying, and hold onto your hat here, there are no rules.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)
I bet you have extra pineapple on your pizza.0 -
It's not the Dane thing now, but neither beast Norman will stop it.Endillion said:
There's Nor way that will happen.ydoethur said:
But the tide will turn!!!Theuniondivvie said:
They really are cnuts.ydoethur said:
Only lazy b'stards use apostrophes anyway though.Endillion said:
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
No, pineapple on pizza is disgusting, do not be absurd.ydoethur said:
Dear heaven. You really are beyond redemption.Alistair said:
I'm saying, and hold onto your hat here, there are no rules.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)
I bet you have extra pineapple on your pizza.0 -
The leftist groups will do well in aggregate, but Macron will be seen to have won ...kle4 said:
Feels like with all this splitting that Macron has ridden this one out.williamglenn said:A second yellow vest party is planning to stand in the European elections.
https://twitter.com/EuropeElects/status/10895939532326051840 -
Hey, you're the anarchist!Alistair said:
No, pineapple on pizza is disgusting, do not be absurd.ydoethur said:
Dear heaven. You really are beyond redemption.Alistair said:
I'm saying, and hold onto your hat here, there are no rules.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)
I bet you have extra pineapple on your pizza.0 -
Luckily these days all they need to do is support Brexit and claim it's out of class solidarity with the lower orders.TheScreamingEagles said:Blimey, I can't imagine people trying to hide their poshness.
Many public-school boys deliberately speak in slang with an Estuary accent, even when they grow up, because “being posh these days is not a good thing”, according to the former headmaster of one of Britain’s top schools.0 -
I don't drink tea but a friend of mine is dating someone who pours the milk in first then adds the tea bags.Alistair said:
No, pineapple on pizza is disgusting, do not be absurd.ydoethur said:
Dear heaven. You really are beyond redemption.Alistair said:
I'm saying, and hold onto your hat here, there are no rules.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)
I bet you have extra pineapple on your pizza.
My friend views this as a degeneracy worse than pineapple on pizza.0 -
Works for those supporting far left policies!williamglenn said:
Luckily these days all they need to do is support Brexit and claim it's out of class solidarity with the lower orders.TheScreamingEagles said:Blimey, I can't imagine people trying to hide their poshness.
Many public-school boys deliberately speak in slang with an Estuary accent, even when they grow up, because “being posh these days is not a good thing”, according to the former headmaster of one of Britain’s top schools.0 -
If so, I predict it will be viewed as a Harald of the apocalypse.ydoethur said:
It's not the Dane thing now, but neither beast Norman will stop it.Endillion said:
There's Nor way that will happen.ydoethur said:
But the tide will turn!!!Theuniondivvie said:
They really are cnuts.ydoethur said:
Only lazy b'stards use apostrophes anyway though.Endillion said:
I am convinced that almost all the people who get huffy about people misusing apostrophes (myself included) would've been unutterably horrified about their introduction in place of missing letters, had they lived through it.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)0 -
Call me old-fashioned but I find this sort of condescending pretending to be something you're not silly. And somewhat patronising. There is nothing wrong with being well-spoken. Too many people nowadays murder the English language - both when speaking and writing. A shame. It is such a beautiful rich language: both muscular and musical. Too many people are barely above the level of chimps these days in their communication skills.kle4 said:
Works for those supporting far left policies!williamglenn said:
Luckily these days all they need to do is support Brexit and claim it's out of class solidarity with the lower orders.TheScreamingEagles said:Blimey, I can't imagine people trying to hide their poshness.
Many public-school boys deliberately speak in slang with an Estuary accent, even when they grow up, because “being posh these days is not a good thing”, according to the former headmaster of one of Britain’s top schools.
0 -
There were two types of Yellow Jackets on Market Street Manchester yesterday.
The Manchester Collective (A left wing bunch) and the free Tommy lot.
I resisted the urge to shout 'Splitters' at them.0 -
Indeed yes.TheScreamingEagles said:
I don't drink tea but a friend of mine is dating someone who pours the milk in first then adds the tea bags.Alistair said:
No, pineapple on pizza is disgusting, do not be absurd.ydoethur said:
Dear heaven. You really are beyond redemption.Alistair said:
I'm saying, and hold onto your hat here, there are no rules.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)
I bet you have extra pineapple on your pizza.
My friend views this as a degeneracy worse than pineapple on pizza.
Teabags are Satan's droppings.0 -
https://youtu.be/FtK_vfp8po8TheScreamingEagles said:
I don't drink tea but a friend of mine is dating someone who pours the milk in first then adds the tea bags.Alistair said:
No, pineapple on pizza is disgusting, do not be absurd.ydoethur said:
Dear heaven. You really are beyond redemption.Alistair said:
I'm saying, and hold onto your hat here, there are no rules.ydoethur said:
So you are saying that basically the rules you are following were out of date a thousand years ago?Alistair said:
Yet we don't speak Old English now. Hmmm. How strange. Almost like language has changed and evolved over time. Crazy. What with these prescriptive rules that we must follow. You think it would stay the same.ydoethur said:He spoke Anglo-Saxon, or Early English! Not the same thing!
You'll be telling me next the Romans spoke Italian...
The meeting when everyone agreed to do the Great Vowel Shift must have been a corker.
(This is a silly debate really, but it beats the B-word any day!)
I bet you have extra pineapple on your pizza.
My friend views this as a degeneracy worse than pineapple on pizza.0 -
Ain't this the truth?Cyclefree said:
Call me old-fashioned but I find this sort of condescending pretending to be something you're not silly. And somewhat patronising. There is nothing wrong with being well-spoken. Too many people nowadays murder the English language - both when speaking and writing. A shame. It is such a beautiful rich language: both muscular and musical. Too many people are barely above the level of chimps these days in their communication skills.kle4 said:
Works for those supporting far left policies!williamglenn said:
Luckily these days all they need to do is support Brexit and claim it's out of class solidarity with the lower orders.TheScreamingEagles said:Blimey, I can't imagine people trying to hide their poshness.
Many public-school boys deliberately speak in slang with an Estuary accent, even when they grow up, because “being posh these days is not a good thing”, according to the former headmaster of one of Britain’s top schools.
Edit - more seriously, I think as regional accents have withered with TV and radio the very English lov of lost causes has kicked in to try and preserve them.0 -
‘Nuff respect. Big up Cyclefree homies.Cyclefree said:
Call me old-fashioned but I find this sort of condescending pretending to be something you're not silly. And somewhat patronising. There is nothing wrong with being well-spoken. Too many people nowadays murder the English language - both when speaking and writing. A shame. It is such a beautiful rich language: both muscular and musical. Too many people are barely above the level of chimps these days in their communication skills.kle4 said:
Works for those supporting far left policies!williamglenn said:
Luckily these days all they need to do is support Brexit and claim it's out of class solidarity with the lower orders.TheScreamingEagles said:Blimey, I can't imagine people trying to hide their poshness.
Many public-school boys deliberately speak in slang with an Estuary accent, even when they grow up, because “being posh these days is not a good thing”, according to the former headmaster of one of Britain’s top schools.
0 -
Easy for Abbott and Corbyn to be "prominent public figures" when they have absolute security of tenure in safe seats. You can keep going for decades without any effective scrutiny.Gardenwalker said:
Mostly agree.ydoethur said:
Stewart, Hammond, Boris, Gove, Cummings, May, Letwin, Redwood, all these get laughed at when they make mistakes like this.TheJezziah said:She gets laughed at because she gets laughed at, the problem is the right wing morons laughing at her are often wrong, they don't realise this though so keep laughing. She does as every politician get things wrong as well.
I suppose at least your 2nd paragraph isn't the usual misogynistic/racist line about getting the job because she slept with Corbyn previously.
She is very left wing herself, her Corbyn and other left wingers are all in the same campaign group and have very similar political beliefs, do you have any reason to believe she wouldn't have supported John McDonnell just as much?
I don't think many people interesting in politics would deny that her and Corbyn are similar (and Mcdonnell) which is usually enough for people to cheerlead for each other.
But they don't keep on doing it (well, OK, Gove and Cummings aside) so they don't keep getting laughed at.
While it is true Abbott does come in for a lot of racist and sexist abuse, she also comes in for a lot of stick because she simply isn't very good at what she does. Yet she does at least sometimes seem to try to hide behind her race and her gender to deflect criticism.
As with Israel, which we have discussed before, it then becomes difficult to disentangle where one ends and the other begins.
But, in a way, Dianne *is* good at what she does. She has been a prominent public figure for 30 years, that’s very good going.
(The point applies equally to other political parties....)0
