The tories don't care. They really don't. State sponsored exploitation is just fine. It's designed into the system.
So long as their client vote is insulated in a life mostly unburdened by taxes, have their benefits uprated and can buy their kids onto the property ladder, they don't care.
Labour are campaigning for people to get free training (e.g. at University) for which they don't get paid - and you all think this is fantastic, even though there is no possible job at the end of it.
A company offer free training with a strong possibility of a job and they are evil?
Let me ask you - even if this was paid training:
- Can Capita insist that the trainee takes the job offered - NO. - Can Capita recoup the costs of the training if the trainee refuses the job or resigns very quickly - NO.
My eyes are open. This is a great scheme and if I were a graduate I would be delighted to do relevant training that might actually get me a job after three years of learning nothing much useful at University. There is no suggestion that the trainees are working for nothing, they are being trained.
In case you had not noticed, employers are declining to train employees for the very simple reason that they cannot get the value back when employees are free to leave at any time which they often do. It probably explains the UKs poor productivity levels. This scheme seems a very sensible reaction to that - ask for some commitment from the employee before giving them free skills that they are free to use elsewhere.
The tories don't care. They really don't. State sponsored exploitation is just fine. It's designed into the system.
So long as their client vote is insulated in a life mostly unburdened by taxes, have their benefits uprated and can buy their kids onto the property ladder, they don't care.
The tories don't care. They really don't. State sponsored exploitation is just fine. It's designed into the system.
So long as their client vote is insulated in a life mostly unburdened by taxes, have their benefits uprated and can buy their kids onto the property ladder, they don't care.
The association of Dunkirk with Brexit is in bad taste and misses the point that soon after we were back in Europe.
What a film!
You enjoyed it?
I loved it.
I'm going to see it this weekend.
Saw it last night - absolutely staggering, numbing. Highly recommended film.
And Jonathan's right, any attempt to associate it with Breixt, whether with a leaver or remainer spin, is totally tasteless and completely undervalues those who were caught up in the events of 1940.
LOL. You are now comparing the USD with GBP, the sickest currency which itself has dropped about 15% in the last year.
Okay, so a Euro was $1.12 a year ago, is now $1.16, so only a 3.5% change there too. A Pound was €1.18 a year ago, and is now €1.10. Still not seeing 15% anywhere.
Comments
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jul/26/capita-criticised-over-free-of-charge-graduate-training-scheme
The tories don't care. They really don't. State sponsored exploitation is just fine. It's designed into the system.
So long as their client vote is insulated in a life mostly unburdened by taxes, have their benefits uprated and can buy their kids onto the property ladder, they don't care.
Just close your eyes, go to conference and clap.
Labour are campaigning for people to get free training (e.g. at University) for which they don't get paid - and you all think this is fantastic, even though there is no possible job at the end of it.
A company offer free training with a strong possibility of a job and they are evil?
Let me ask you - even if this was paid training:
- Can Capita insist that the trainee takes the job offered - NO.
- Can Capita recoup the costs of the training if the trainee refuses the job or resigns very quickly - NO.
My eyes are open. This is a great scheme and if I were a graduate I would be delighted to do relevant training that might actually get me a job after three years of learning nothing much useful at University. There is no suggestion that the trainees are working for nothing, they are being trained.
In case you had not noticed, employers are declining to train employees for the very simple reason that they cannot get the value back when employees are free to leave at any time which they often do. It probably explains the UKs poor productivity levels. This scheme seems a very sensible reaction to that - ask for some commitment from the employee before giving them free skills that they are free to use elsewhere.
And Jonathan's right, any attempt to associate it with Breixt, whether with a leaver or remainer spin, is totally tasteless and completely undervalues those who were caught up in the events of 1940.