politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Corporeal on the GOP and project Dump Trump

Trump hits GOP leadership while campaign struggles to defend him https://t.co/J5GyzUa2wn via @KyleDCheney | Getty pic.twitter.com/kWmW13KERo
Comments
-
First like..er..Clinton.0
-
I have the popcorn ready for later on....don't let me down Donald, go total loco.0
-
Second, like Trump0
-
@iainjwatson: Jack Dromey - who warned of a 'catastrophic defeat' when he resigned - returns to #labour front bench - as does Pat Glass0
-
Spineless....Scott_P said:@iainjwatson: Jack Dromey - who warned of a 'catastrophic defeat' when he resigned - returns to #labour front bench - as does Pat Glass
0 -
A borefest will not do Donald!FrancisUrquhart said:I have the popcorn ready for later on....don't let me down Donald, go total loco.
0 -
The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce: https://twitter.com/chrisdocnee/status/785159503419351040?s=090
-
Very much depends on the context. If this is the 'much worse' it could potentially be a damp squib.Alistair said:The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce:
0 -
The N word?Alistair said:The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce: https://twitter.com/chrisdocnee/status/785159503419351040?s=09
But but but the PB Trump Rampers told me African Americans were going to vote for Trump in record numbers. Even DC is in play for Trump..0 -
Packers/ Giants tonight, but I will be watching bits of the debate on the laptop. It looks like Trump has nothing to lose right now so god only knows what he will come out with tonight.FrancisUrquhart said:I have the popcorn ready for later on....don't let me down Donald, go total loco.
0 -
Cannot remember anyone saying African-Americans were in play for Trump; it was more that they might not come out for HRC as they did for Obama.TheScreamingEagles said:
The N word?Alistair said:The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce: https://twitter.com/chrisdocnee/status/785159503419351040?s=09
But but but the PB Trump Rampers told me African Americans were going to vote for Trump in record numbers. Even DC is in play for Trump..0 -
Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?0
-
Have a look at one or two full time posters.TheKitchenCabinet said:
Cannot remember anyone saying African-Americans were in play for Trump; it was more that they might not come out for HRC as they did for Obama.TheScreamingEagles said:
The N word?Alistair said:The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce: https://twitter.com/chrisdocnee/status/785159503419351040?s=09
But but but the PB Trump Rampers told me African Americans were going to vote for Trump in record numbers. Even DC is in play for Trump..0 -
Still might.TheScreamingEagles said:
The N word?Alistair said:The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce: https://twitter.com/chrisdocnee/status/785159503419351040?s=09
But but but the PB Trump Rampers told me African Americans were going to vote for Trump in record numbers. Even DC is in play for Trump..
It'll only be the safe-space snowflakes obsessed with political correctness that'll be bothered by stuff like that.0 -
They always say each POTUS campaign is the most expensive yet...this time it could be off the charts as the cost to the donald's brand dependent fortune could be billions.0
-
I've been trying to keep the whole thing at arm's length, because it all seems disgraceful to me. These two are the pick of the bunch? Really??williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
0 -
I'd guess there may be a whole raft of sexual harassment cases to be paid for as well..FrancisUrquhart said:They always say each POTUS campaign is the most expensive yet...this time it could be off the charts as the cost to the donald's brand dependent fortune could be billions.
0 -
The Apprentice tapes aren't controlled by NBC, trybare owned by the producer - who is a Trump supporter.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
0 -
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
0 -
That isn't the case. The 5 million is supposedly to pay the fine for breach of contract by an employee.Thrak said:
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
Think about it Burnett is worth 100s millions, if he wanted to release them he owns the rights & that kind of money is irrevelant.0 -
The rumour is that this is the one that is the same level as pussy grab. The much worse is potentially a criminal offence.williamglenn said:
Very much depends on the context. If this is the 'much worse' it could potentially be a damp squib.Alistair said:The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce:
0 -
0
-
No, the tweet clearly says they had heard from a source that the 'much worse' was the n-word.Alistair said:
The rumour is that this is the one that is the same level as pussy grab. The much worse is potentially a criminal offence.williamglenn said:
Very much depends on the context. If this is the 'much worse' it could potentially be a damp squib.Alistair said:The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce:
0 -
Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/0 -
I have to say it is a little surprising that if trump regularly spouted awful stuff on mic over 10+ seasons of the apprentice that nothing has leaked before he even thought a out running for POTUS.
Think how for instance Christian bale has a terrible reputation in Hollywood & eventually somebody just went sod it & released him going ape shit.0 -
La times? exactly one step up from voodooPaul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/0 -
Does he count as female as he was selected under AWS?Scott_P said:@iainjwatson: Jack Dromey - who warned of a 'catastrophic defeat' when he resigned - returns to #labour front bench
0 -
Hmm, ethically dodgy to pay for him breaking a contract. Maybe a private individual could stump up the cash.FrancisUrquhart said:
That isn't the case. The 5 million is supposedly to pay the fine for breach of contract by an employee.Thrak said:
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
Think about it Burnett is worth 100s millions, if he wanted to release them he owns the rights & that kind of money is irrevelant.
0 -
Is it even legal? I don't know.Thrak said:
Hmm, ethically dodgy to pay for him breaking a contract. Maybe a private individual could stump up the cash.FrancisUrquhart said:
That isn't the case. The 5 million is supposedly to pay the fine for breach of contract by an employee.Thrak said:
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
Think about it Burnett is worth 100s millions, if he wanted to release them he owns the rights & that kind of money is irrevelant.0 -
Was 3% yesterday and 4 % a few days ago.Paul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/
Also they have issues with weighting, I think 538 would shift this to a 4 point Hilary lead.0 -
It does appear that Hattie has bigger balls than he does...TCPoliticalBetting said:Does he count as female as he was selected under AWS?
0 -
I've seen phone companies (I think, some sort of utility, anyway) say they'll pay your penalties for early cancellation with another firm.FrancisUrquhart said:
Is it even legal? I don't know.Thrak said:
Hmm, ethically dodgy to pay for him breaking a contract. Maybe a private individual could stump up the cash.FrancisUrquhart said:
That isn't the case. The 5 million is supposedly to pay the fine for breach of contract by an employee.Thrak said:
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
Think about it Burnett is worth 100s millions, if he wanted to release them he owns the rights & that kind of money is irrevelant.0 -
Talking of big balls...guy Martin attempting to break fastest speed on 2 wheels now on ch4Scott_P said:
It does appear that Hattie has bigger balls than he does...TCPoliticalBetting said:Does he count as female as he was selected under AWS?
0 -
I think a better analogy would be an employee of one phone company leaking your personal data to the rival one.William_H said:
I've seen phone companies (I think, some sort of utility, anyway) say they'll pay your penalties for early cancellation with another firm.FrancisUrquhart said:
Is it even legal? I don't know.Thrak said:
Hmm, ethically dodgy to pay for him breaking a contract. Maybe a private individual could stump up the cash.FrancisUrquhart said:
That isn't the case. The 5 million is supposedly to pay the fine for breach of contract by an employee.Thrak said:
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
Think about it Burnett is worth 100s millions, if he wanted to release them he owns the rights & that kind of money is irrevelant.0 -
Early returns from Florida show Trump in a commanding lead
https://countyballotfiles.elections.myflorida.com/FVRSCountyBallotReports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats0 -
Bigger balls? There was also that strange episode of Dromey's computer interests.Scott_P said:
It does appear that Hattie has bigger balls than he does...TCPoliticalBetting said:Does he count as female as he was selected under AWS?
0 -
I seemed to remember he had rather niche interests.TCPoliticalBetting said:
Bigger balls? There was also that strange episode of Dromey's computer interests.Scott_P said:
It does appear that Hattie has bigger balls than he does...TCPoliticalBetting said:Does he count as female as he was selected under AWS?
0 -
A most unfair and unworthy statement. The chicken entrails have a far greater chance of being accurate.619 said:
La times? exactly one step up from voodooPaul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/0 -
In English law it would be doubtful whether Burnett could enforce the clause against the employee, and a cursory Google suggests us law is the same. I doubt it would be illegal for a third party to agree to pay on the employee's behalf, it the penalty turns out to be enforceable.FrancisUrquhart said:
Is it even legal? I don't know.Thrak said:
Hmm, ethically dodgy to pay for him breaking a contract. Maybe a private individual could stump up the cash.FrancisUrquhart said:
That isn't the case. The 5 million is supposedly to pay the fine for breach of contract by an employee.Thrak said:
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
Think about it Burnett is worth 100s millions, if he wanted to release them he owns the rights & that kind of money is irrevelant.0 -
-
If that's the case, $5 million is chicken feed then. If the tapes have something terrible on them we will be hearing them.Ishmael_X said:
In English law it would be doubtful whether Burnett could enforce the clause against the employee, and a cursory Google suggests us law is the same. I doubt it would be illegal for a third party to agree to pay on the employee's behalf, it the penalty turns out to be enforceable.FrancisUrquhart said:
Is it even legal? I don't know.Thrak said:
Hmm, ethically dodgy to pay for him breaking a contract. Maybe a private individual could stump up the cash.FrancisUrquhart said:
That isn't the case. The 5 million is supposedly to pay the fine for breach of contract by an employee.Thrak said:
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
Think about it Burnett is worth 100s millions, if he wanted to release them he owns the rights & that kind of money is irrevelant.0 -
Ah... A vindaloo poll!ydoethur said:
A most unfair and unworthy statement. The chicken entrails have a far greater chance of being accurate.619 said:
La times? exactly one step up from voodooPaul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/0 -
4000? decent for trump but we dont know how the independents are voting. or hispanic repubs...weejonnie said:Early returns from Florida show Trump in a commanding lead
https://countyballotfiles.elections.myflorida.com/FVRSCountyBallotReports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats0 -
You could be cynical and say right now he's the centre of the story, and when/if the tapes come out he won't be.FrancisUrquhart said:
That isn't the case. The 5 million is supposedly to pay the fine for breach of contract by an employee.Thrak said:
It's The Apprentice producer Burnett who owns them and he's ransoming them off for five million dollars. If I was a news organisation that could afford that sort of cash (and can they?), I'd tell him that any money paid for it has to go to relevant charities or no deal.williamglenn said:Isn't it a disgrace for a national news organisation to sit on something that could be electorally relevant at this point?
Think about it Burnett is worth 100s millions, if he wanted to release them he owns the rights & that kind of money is irrevelant.
Or that guys worth 100s of millions got there by leveraging all the profit they can out of every situation and they don't lose that habit.0 -
538 don't grade the LA Times but they do use their polls. Historically it has a Republican bias of +4 so the lead of +2 for Trump translates to a lead of +2 for Clinton. It is a seven day moving average so it takes a little time to catch up with events.Paul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/0 -
Tha will firm up his base.williamglenn said:
No, the tweet clearly says they had heard from a source that the 'much worse' was the n-word.Alistair said:
The rumour is that this is the one that is the same level as pussy grab. The much worse is potentially a criminal offence.williamglenn said:
Very much depends on the context. If this is the 'much worse' it could potentially be a damp squib.Alistair said:The alleged content of the Apprentice tapes is hot sauce:
0 -
what? No one suggested Dracula?619 said:0 -
Very small numbers but they show the numbers by registered voters, not votes cast.weejonnie said:Early returns from Florida show Trump in a commanding lead
https://countyballotfiles.elections.myflorida.com/FVRSCountyBallotReports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats
PPPPolls are showing only 70% of registered Republicans voting for Trump. If you apply that to the early returns, the Trump lead disappears.0 -
Talking of big Balls - he's through to the next round.FrancisUrquhart said:
Talking of big balls...guy Martin attempting to break fastest speed on 2 wheels now on ch4Scott_P said:
It does appear that Hattie has bigger balls than he does...TCPoliticalBetting said:Does he count as female as he was selected under AWS?
0 -
Got to love Guy Martin..."previous record holder crashed, rolled 16 times and that didn't kill him...so thats ok".0
-
The other benchmark is the 2012 returns. In NC the Dems are ahead of their 2012 returns, are these FL returns ahead or behind past rates of return?Barnesian said:
Very small numbers but they show the numbers by registered voters, not votes cast.weejonnie said:Early returns from Florida show Trump in a commanding lead
https://countyballotfiles.elections.myflorida.com/FVRSCountyBallotReports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats
PPPPolls are showing only 70% of registered Republicans voting for Trump. If you apply that to the early returns, the Trump lead disappears.0 -
Michael McDonald @ElectProject Oct 8Barnesian said:
Very small numbers but they show the numbers by registered voters, not votes cast.weejonnie said:Early returns from Florida show Trump in a commanding lead
https://countyballotfiles.elections.myflorida.com/FVRSCountyBallotReports/AbsenteeEarlyVotingReports/PublicStats
PPPPolls are showing only 70% of registered Republicans voting for Trump. If you apply that to the early returns, the Trump lead disappears.
Reps just shy of catching Dems in returned ballots, passed on requests last week (Reps prefer mail ballots, Dems in-person, so expected)
Reps are expected to have lead now due to using mail in ballots.0 -
What if Trump was caught on tape using he N word?0
-
Nige appears finally to have broken (luvvie) America.
https://twitter.com/wilw/status/7848200519794728960 -
Cue Kippers and Trumpers* channelling this videoTheuniondivvie said:Nige appears finally to have broken (luvvie) America.
https://twitter.com/wilw/status/784820051979472896
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3fWy9UMDHs
*One wonders what that Venn diagram looks like0 -
Guy Martin confirmed totally bonkers.0
-
Which bell end thought scheduling the Japanese Grand Prix and a Presidential debate within 24 hours of each other was a good idea? #FuckingTimeZones0
-
-
-
the republican base are ok with him admitting to committing sexual assaultsY0kel said:0 -
-
Have a 'Like' for that.FrancisUrquhart said:0 -
Donald J. Trump @realDonaldTrump 30 Jun 2013
"@EDM___HEAD: @realDonaldTrump @EdandBev lyin ass nigga" Why does Paula D get destroyed and you can use the "N" word so freely, asshole?
0 -
Hahaha - not at all!peter_from_putney said:
I was on a quiz show and I gave the wrong answer to something that I knew.
You can hear me mutter it under my breath instinctively.0 -
https://mobile.twitter.com/YayImOnline/status/784500681679908864619 said:
He would have to resign. If he trys to carry on, he will just have david dukes, scott baio and ted cruz left.Y0kel said:What if Trump was caught on tape using he N word?
0 -
My first assessment (assuming Macron doesn't make waves) is that the most likely winner of the French Presidency is Juppé (62%) follwed by Le Pen (16%), Sarkozy (16%), Hollande (4%) and Montebourg (2.5%). Although I can check the markets iirc that makes Juppé value, as I think he was comfortably outside evens when I last checked.0
-
Shock horror.. people lie, boast, and exaggerate.619 said:0 -
Guy Martin - "She crashes well...normally on a motorbike it is tarmac, sky, tarmac, sky, tarmac, ambulance...and that didn't happen here".
Why the hell didn't he get the Top Gear gig?0 -
'Tho they are obverses maybe Trump and Corbyn might consider comparing notes. There do seem to be parallels.0
-
Not good enough evidence to convict.619 said:0 -
Probably not good enough to get to trial if I remember my US evidentiary standards briefing.TheWhiteRabbit said:
Not good enough evidence to convict.619 said:0 -
0
-
Pop quiz hot shots, does anyone know the link between Joss Whedon and Seumas Milne?
0 -
I think you got away with it.TheScreamingEagles said:
Probably not good enough to get to trial if I remember my US evidentiary standards briefing.TheWhiteRabbit said:
Not good enough evidence to convict.619 said:0 -
Re: returned postal ballots, surely a lot of Republicans must be fully intending to return them, but sitting on them to see if they'll have to write in a candidate, or for that matter weighing up voting for Johnson.0
-
Because Top Gear Don't do Motorcycles. That's a mistake at this point. It needs some fresh blood, and I think he'd be interesting foil for Le BlancFrancisUrquhart said:Guy Martin - "She crashes well...normally on a motorbike it is tarmac, sky, tarmac, sky, tarmac, ambulance...and that didn't happen here".
Why the hell didn't he get the Top Gear gig?0 -
La Times may be skewed to the GOP - but presumably the trend would be pretty accurate.ydoethur said:
A most unfair and unworthy statement. The chicken entrails have a far greater chance of being accurate.619 said:
La times? exactly one step up from voodooPaul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/
At the moment of course things are not developing necesserilly to Trump's advantage - but there are 4 weeks to go.0 -
-
Place of education? Only thing that could possibly link them.TheScreamingEagles said:Pop quiz hot shots, does anyone know the link between Joss Whedon and Seumas Milne?
0 -
YupAlistair said:
Place of education? Only thing that could possibly link them.TheScreamingEagles said:Pop quiz hot shots, does anyone know the link between Joss Whedon and Seumas Milne?
0 -
The media cycle could move on from Trump's comments, just as it did from Hillary's incident at the 9/11 memorial, which now seems to be forgotten. However, the mass withdrawal of Republican bigwig support looks like the real game-changer.weejonnie said:
La Times may be skewed to the GOP - but presumably the trend would be pretty accurate.ydoethur said:
A most unfair and unworthy statement. The chicken entrails have a far greater chance of being accurate.619 said:
La times? exactly one step up from voodooPaul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/
At the moment of course things are not developing necesserilly to Trump's advantage - but there are 4 weeks to go.0 -
weejonnie said:ydoethur said:619 said:
understatement of the yearPaul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
At the moment of course things are not developing necesserilly to Trump's advantage - but there are 4 weeks to go.0 -
0
-
The Democrat's theory of voter modeling says there are very few real undecideds. Only people who have yet to be convinced to vote for their natural party. Debate 1 in 2012 combined Republicans to vote but not work of them, debate 2 and 3 combined Obama voters to vote.Essexit said:Re: returned postal ballots, surely a lot of Republicans must be fully intending to return them, but sitting on them to see if they'll have to write in a candidate, or for that matter weighing up voting for Johnson.
0 -
How's that gropey, mangy stuff workin' out for ya?
https://twitter.com/AskingAmy/status/7848536133026693120 -
Where?TheScreamingEagles said:
YupAlistair said:
Place of education? Only thing that could possibly link them.TheScreamingEagles said:Pop quiz hot shots, does anyone know the link between Joss Whedon and Seumas Milne?
0 -
Winchester.Alistair said:
Where?TheScreamingEagles said:
YupAlistair said:
Place of education? Only thing that could possibly link them.TheScreamingEagles said:Pop quiz hot shots, does anyone know the link between Joss Whedon and Seumas Milne?
0 -
That sounds to me like a completely bollocks over generalisation, and certainly not one that I would buy from anyone other than an American, which i assume you are not. What I am not clear about is why you keep writing posts which really boil down to "I hate Trump" - which is fair enough but not illuminating. If you are just doing your best to ensure we all get out and vote for Hillary on 8 November, I am afraid you are labouring under a misapprehension.619 said:
the republican base are ok with him admitting to committing sexual assaultsY0kel said:
Not complaining, just curious.0 -
Does it - Trump is the 'anti-establishment' candidate in effect if not in name. The fact that the establishment are dropping him could be construed positively.Essexit said:
The media cycle could move on from Trump's comments, just as it did from Hillary's incident at the 9/11 memorial, which now seems to be forgotten. However, the mass withdrawal of Republican bigwig support looks like the real game-changer.weejonnie said:
La Times may be skewed to the GOP - but presumably the trend would be pretty accurate.ydoethur said:
A most unfair and unworthy statement. The chicken entrails have a far greater chance of being accurate.619 said:
La times? exactly one step up from voodooPaul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/
At the moment of course things are not developing necesserilly to Trump's advantage - but there are 4 weeks to go.0 -
There's one thing conspicuous by its absence in that report.TheScreamingEagles said:With the Goldman Sachs news then this
https://twitter.com/JolyonMaugham/status/7852104287334891520 -
Not in GOTV/campaigning efforts.weejonnie said:
Does it - Trump is the 'anti-establishment' candidate in effect if not in name. The fact that the establishment are dropping him could be construed positively.Essexit said:
The media cycle could move on from Trump's comments, just as it did from Hillary's incident at the 9/11 memorial, which now seems to be forgotten. However, the mass withdrawal of Republican bigwig support looks like the real game-changer.weejonnie said:
La Times may be skewed to the GOP - but presumably the trend would be pretty accurate.ydoethur said:
A most unfair and unworthy statement. The chicken entrails have a far greater chance of being accurate.619 said:
La times? exactly one step up from voodooPaul_Bedfordshire said:Trump is tweeting a poll today that puts him 2% ahead of Clinton.
No idea as to where it stands on the Gold Standard tto Voodoo scale though:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/la-times-usc-dornsife-sunday-poll-donald-trump-retains-2-point-lead-hillary/
At the moment of course things are not developing necesserilly to Trump's advantage - but there are 4 weeks to go.
The GOP infrastructure have dumped Trump/gone on strike.
It seems inconceivable Trump can win without their day to day/operational support.0