Undefined discussion subject.
Comments
-
Come June 23rd, we'll be able to share great tales of the stupidity of some voters on both sides.Richard_Tyndall said:
It is a claim that was repeated to me almost word for word when I was on a Leave stall in Newark a couple of weeks ago. Along with the idiocy that the EU prevented war in Europe.TheScreamingEagles said:
It was a joke, in response to DavidL's and Robert's joke.Richard_Tyndall said:
No we didn't. Even you are not dumb enough to believe that. We joined and remained the sick man of Europe until we elected a leader who was willing and able to deal with the issues. Being in the EEC at the time had Sweet FA to do with it.TheScreamingEagles said:
In the 70s we were the sick man of Europe, we then joined the EC, and miraculously stopped being the sick man of Europe.rcs1000 said:
Don't be stupid, there was no UK before the EU, merely a small barren island populated by a few starving savagesDavidL said:
You'll be telling us life went on before the EU next. And who could believe that?peter_from_putney said:
Don't forget that 10 years ago we didn't have smart phones, 20 years ago we didn't have the internet and 80 years ago we didn't have TV, let alone David Dimbleby or even his dad!Indigo said:Very interesting thanks.
I am studying the local opinion polls here in the Philippines for the General election a week on Monday, it's it going to be fascinating to see how accurate it is, as you would think on the surface they have some almost insurmountable problems in getting a representative sample.
A country of 100 million people, 54.5 million registered voters, encompassing an archipelago of some 7,641 islands. 25 million people and probably a third of the electorate live in the capital, with many more spread out amongst hundreds of small regional cities, but probably half the population living out in the "province" in small village settlements. Quite a few of those in the remotest areas won't have a television set themselves but will share one communally, and may only have 2-3 mobile phones in the extended family, and certainly won't have a landline or an internet connection. But civic pride is keenly felt, and most adults will vote.
But somehow or other we still managed to get by when General Elections came along.
Huzzah for the EC
No claim is too dumb for some Remain supporters at the moment.0 -
Mark, everyone knows that autocorrect is supposed to prevent criticism of our near perfect Chancellor, not cause it. That will never fly.MarkHopkins said:DavidL said:
Damn. And you waited until my 6 minutes were up. Trapped for posterity. What do I do now?Danny565 said:
DavidL in "mildly unflattering comment about Osborne" SHOCKDavidL said:
That is an awful lot of people not particularly incentivised to vote for a party trying to restrict public spending.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
Over the same period the amount of income tax paid by the richest 1 per cent has risen from 24.4 per cent to 27.5 per cent, meaning that 300,000 people pay more than a quarter of the nation's income tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/26/nearly-half-of-britons-pay-no-income-tax-as-burden-on-rich-incre/
* This is clearly wrong, as there aren't 60+ million working age adults in the UK (even with the dodgy government figures)
As they kept saying in Meet the Robinsons " I am not sure that this plan has been properly thought through ,"
Blame it on auto-correct?
0 -
Hah !MaxPB said:http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/sanders-clinton-supporters-go-out-to-you
A audience member who said he backs Sanders' candidacy asked the senator whether he will encourage his supporters to back Clinton if she wins the nomination.
"We’re not a movement where I can snap my fingers and say to you or to anybody else what you should do, that you should all listen to me. You shouldn’t. You make these decisions yourself," Sanders replied.
He then said that Clinton will have to court his supporters herself.
"And if Secretary Clinton wins, it is incumbent upon her to tell millions of people who right now do not believe in establishment politics or establishment economics, who have serious misgivings about a candidate who has received millions of dollars from Wall Street and other special interests," he said. "She has got to go out to you."
Ruh roh.
That's as close to a non endorsement as you'll get from Sanders. Desperately unhelpful to Hillary.0 -
If you calculate by GDP per head then the difference becomes even greater:another_richard said:
Growth was higher in the 1970s:TheScreamingEagles said:
Was down, to Callaghan, Healey, and Thatcher.DavidL said:
So, nothing to do with finding a lot of oil in the North Sea then? Or Maggie? Just the munificent EU. We are truly not worthy.TheScreamingEagles said:
In the 70s we were the sick man of Europe, we then joined the EC, and miraculously stopped being the sick man of Europe.rcs1000 said:
Don't be stupid, there was no UK before the EU, merely a small barren island populated by a few starving savagesDavidL said:
You'll be telling us life went on before the EU next. And who could believe that?
Huzzah for the EC
I saw some stats on twitter last week, economically we truly were a basket case in the 70s, and the EC was performing much better than us, which was one of the reasons we voted to Remain in 1975.
Now the stats are the other way around.
1970-1979 2.6%pa
2000-2009 1.9%pa
2010-2015 2.0%pa
http://web.ons.gov.uk/ons/datasets-and-tables/data-selector.html?cdid=IHYP&dataset=pn2&table-id=C2
It was also an era of higher productivity growth and increasing home ownership.
There were many things wrong with the 1970s but we tend to be complacent about how successful we are now.
1970-1979 2.5%pa
2000-2009 1.3%pa
2010-2015 1.3%pa
http://web.ons.gov.uk/ons/datasets-and-tables/data-selector.html?cdid=N3Y6&dataset=qna&table-id=P
0 -
You think this is the right response to having a Tory Chancellor who seems to be more left wing than me? Not sure about that.Danny565 said:
You give into your urges and apply for your Labour Momentum membershipDavidL said:
Damn. And you waited until my 6 minutes were up. Trapped for posterity. What do I do now?Danny565 said:
DavidL in "mildly unflattering comment about Osborne" SHOCKDavidL said:
That is an awful lot of people not particularly incentivised to vote for a party trying to restrict public spending.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
Over the same period the amount of income tax paid by the richest 1 per cent has risen from 24.4 per cent to 27.5 per cent, meaning that 300,000 people pay more than a quarter of the nation's income tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/26/nearly-half-of-britons-pay-no-income-tax-as-burden-on-rich-incre/
* This is clearly wrong, as there aren't 60+ million working age adults in the UK (even with the dodgy government figures)
As they kept saying in Meet the Robinsons " I am not sure that this plan has been properly thought through ,"0 -
Lack of manpower due to full employment meant that businesses had to invest to boost productivity.another_richard said:
Growth was higher in the 1970s:TheScreamingEagles said:
Was down, to Callaghan, Healey, and Thatcher.DavidL said:
So, nothing to do with finding a lot of oil in the North Sea then? Or Maggie? Just the munificent EU. We are truly not worthy.TheScreamingEagles said:
In the 70s we were the sick man of Europe, we then joined the EC, and miraculously stopped being the sick man of Europe.rcs1000 said:
Don't be stupid, there was no UK before the EU, merely a small barren island populated by a few starving savagesDavidL said:
You'll be telling us life went on before the EU next. And who could believe that?peter_from_putney said:
Don't forget that 10 years ago we didn't have smart phones, 20 years ago we didn't have the internet and 80 years ago we didn't have TV, let alone David Dimbleby or even his dad!Indigo said:Very interesting thanks.
A country of 100 million people, 54.5 million registered voters, encompassing an archipelago of some 7,641 islands. 25 million people and probably a third of the electorate live in the capital, with many more spread out amongst hundreds of small regional cities, but probably half the population living out in the "province" in small village settlements. Quite a few of those in the remotest areas won't have a television set themselves but will share one communally, and may only have 2-3 mobile phones in the extended family, and certainly won't have a landline or an internet connection. But civic pride is keenly felt, and most adults will vote.
But somehow or other we still managed to get by when General Elections came along.
Huzzah for the EC
I saw some stats on twitter last week, economically we truly were a basket case in the 70s, and the EC was performing much better than us, which was one of the reasons we voted to Remain in 1975.
Now the stats are the other way around.
1970-1979 2.6%pa
2000-2009 1.9%pa
2010-2015 2.0%pa
http://web.ons.gov.uk/ons/datasets-and-tables/data-selector.html?cdid=IHYP&dataset=pn2&table-id=C2
It was also an era of higher productivity growth and increasing home ownership.
There were many things wrong with the 1970s but we tend to be complacent about how successful we are now.
Today with endless manpower due to mass immigration there is no reason for businesses to invest for productivity gains.0 -
No, what changed is that as soon as we got on board we managed to bugger up the EEC so it didn't work as well for the existing members. First they grew more slowly, then as slowly as us and eventually even more slowly than us. This cunning plan has almost reached completion with pretty much no growth in the EZ at all so it is now safe for us to leave.TheScreamingEagles said:
The metrics used wasn't just growth, things like industrial days lost to strike, unemployment etc.another_richard said:
Growth was higher in the 1970s:TheScreamingEagles said:
Was down, to Callaghan, Healey, and Thatcher.DavidL said:
So, nothing to do with finding a lot of oil in the North Sea then? Or Maggie? Just the munificent EU. We are truly not worthy.TheScreamingEagles said:
In the 70s we were the sick man of Europe, we then joined the EC, and miraculously stopped being the sick man of Europe.rcs1000 said:
Don't be stupid, there was no UK before the EU, merely a small barren island populated by a few starving savagesDavidL said:
You'll be telling us life went on before the EU next. And who could believe that?peter_from_putney said:
Don't forget that 10 years ago we didn't have smart phones, 20 years ago we didn't have the internet and 80 years ago we didn't have TV, let alone David Dimbleby or even his dad!Indigo said:
But somehow or other we still managed to get by when General Elections came along.
Huzzah for the EC
I saw some stats on twitter last week, economically we truly were a basket case in the 70s, and the EC was performing much better than us, which was one of the reasons we voted to Remain in 1975.
Now the stats are the other way around.
1970-1979 2.6%pa
2000-2009 1.9%pa
2010-2015 2.0%pa
http://web.ons.gov.uk/ons/datasets-and-tables/data-selector.html?cdid=IHYP&dataset=pn2&table-id=C2
It was also an era of higher productivity growth and increasing home ownership.
There were many things wrong with the 1970s but we tend to be complacent about how successful we are now.0 -
On income tax, fair enough. I suspect that the poor pay little in capital gains tax or inheritance tax either.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
Over the same period the amount of income tax paid by the richest 1 per cent has risen from 24.4 per cent to 27.5 per cent, meaning that 300,000 people pay more than a quarter of the nation's income tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/26/nearly-half-of-britons-pay-no-income-tax-as-burden-on-rich-incre/
* This is clearly wrong, as there aren't 60+ million working age adults in the UK (even with the dodgy government figures)
They do pay a lot of VAT, and other duties on tobacco, alcohol, and fuel. Voluntary behaviours in many ways , but a significant contribution to national coffers.0 -
-
I do hope we keep the NHS forever, soooooooooooo many medical commercials on US TV !0
-
It feels very much the way the Tories have in the past had issues with too many who were homophobic & racist....now labour have similar issues with antisemitism, equality, etc.SeanT said:The Naz Shah story perpetuates a toxic narrative for Labour.
I don't for a second believe that 1% of white British Labour voters are anti-Semitic. It just doesn't exist in their core vote, or their wider British vote.
But the Labour PARTY is now infested with anti-Semitism. And the vector is: Islam.0 -
Boris Trumpanother_richard said:0 -
A natural consequence of the land bridge flooding.rcs1000 said:
Don't be stupid, there was no UK before the EU, merely a small barren island populated by a few starving savagesDavidL said:
You'll be telling us life went on before the EU next. And who could believe that?peter_from_putney said:
Don't forget that 10 years ago we didn't have smart phones, 20 years ago we didn't have the internet and 80 years ago we didn't have TV, let alone David Dimbleby or even his dad!Indigo said:Very interesting thanks.
I am studying the local opinion polls here in the Philippines for the General election a week on Monday, it's it going to be fascinating to see how accurate it is, as you would think on the surface they have some almost insurmountable problems in getting a representative sample.
A country of 100 million people, 54.5 million registered voters, encompassing an archipelago of some 7,641 islands. 25 million people and probably a third of the electorate live in the capital, with many more spread out amongst hundreds of small regional cities, but probably half the population living out in the "province" in small village settlements. Quite a few of those in the remotest areas won't have a television set themselves but will share one communally, and may only have 2-3 mobile phones in the extended family, and certainly won't have a landline or an internet connection. But civic pride is keenly felt, and most adults will vote.
But somehow or other we still managed to get by when General Elections came along.
Now that's what you call BREXIT.0 -
Interest piece Pulpstar.
Thanks for sharing0 -
Whoever owns that account is very witty. The attempt to ape it with a Merkel spoof 'Queen_Europe' pales in comparison.FrancisUrquhart said:Queen_UK
0 -
It all connects:Speedy said:
Lack of manpower due to full employment meant that businesses had to invest to boost productivity.another_richard said:
Growth was higher in the 1970s:TheScreamingEagles said:
Was down, to Callaghan, Healey, and Thatcher.DavidL said:
So, nothing to do with finding a lot of oil in the North Sea then? Or Maggie? Just the munificent EU. We are truly not worthy.TheScreamingEagles said:
In the 70s we were the sick man of Europe, we then joined the EC, and miraculously stopped being the sick man of Europe.rcs1000 said:
Don't be stupid, there was no UK before the EU, merely a small barren island populated by a few starving savagesDavidL said:
You'll be telling us life went on before the EU next. And who could believe that?peter_from_putney said:
Don't forget that 10 years ago we didn't have smart phones, 20 years ago we didn't have the internet and 80 years ago we didn't have TV, let alone David Dimbleby or even his dad!Indigo said:Very interesting thanks.
A country of 100 million people, 54.5 million registered voters, encompassing an archipelago of some 7,641 islands. 25 million people and probably a third of the electorate live in the capital, with many more spread out amongst hundreds of small regional cities, but probably half the population living out in the "province" in small village settlements. Quite a few of those in the remotest areas won't have a television set themselves but will share one communally, and may only have 2-3 mobile phones in the extended family, and certainly won't have a landline or an internet connection. But civic pride is keenly felt, and most adults will vote.
But somehow or other we still managed to get by when General Elections came along.
Huzzah for the EC
I saw some stats on twitter last week, economically we truly were a basket case in the 70s, and the EC was performing much better than us, which was one of the reasons we voted to Remain in 1975.
Now the stats are the other way around.
1970-1979 2.6%pa
2000-2009 1.9%pa
2010-2015 2.0%pa
http://web.ons.gov.uk/ons/datasets-and-tables/data-selector.html?cdid=IHYP&dataset=pn2&table-id=C2
It was also an era of higher productivity growth and increasing home ownership.
There were many things wrong with the 1970s but we tend to be complacent about how successful we are now.
Today with endless manpower due to mass immigration there is no reason for businesses to invest for productivity gains.
Higher investment -> higher productivity -> higher pay -> higher home ownership
0 -
Tom Watson? I can sorta see it.another_richard said:0 -
FPT
Slam dunk for Leave tonight in the Spectator debate.
There were 2,200 in the audience according to Andrew Neil. Largest in the history of the Spectator.
It was a simple show of cards at the end, adjudicated by Dan Hannan and Liz Kendal.
From what I saw I'd say 60% for Leave, 30% for Remain and 10% still undecided.
It really was very good. I'd recommend to anyone to watch it.
0 -
He's Liberal, not Labour.Alanbrooke said:James David Cameron ?
0 -
Large parts of East Germany are depopulated because of the lack of well paying jobs. The government subsidies to try and create employment there are humongousFrancisUrquhart said:
It obviously even worse, as a lot of those people will also be on tax credits.DavidL said:
That is an awful lot of people not particularly incentivised to vote for a party trying to restrict public spending.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
Over the same period the amount of income tax paid by the richest 1 per cent has risen from 24.4 per cent to 27.5 per cent, meaning that 300,000 people pay more than a quarter of the nation's income tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/26/nearly-half-of-britons-pay-no-income-tax-as-burden-on-rich-incre/
* This is clearly wrong, as there aren't 60+ million working age adults in the UK (even with the dodgy government figures)
As they kept saying in Meet the Robinsons " I am not sure that this plan has been properly thought through ,"
What it highlights to me is we clearly have far too many people being paid very little or not working, and there isn't an easy way to fix the former. Simply escalating minimum wage further won't do it. We have a huge structural imbalance, just as we do with service vs other sectors.
Would be interesting to know wage distributions in Germany. I am presuming because of a much bigger [semi]-skilled manufacturing base, those people get paid reasonably well.0 -
Except there weren't ever many racists in the Conservative Party. They were more likely to be found in Labour areas like the East End.FrancisUrquhart said:
It feels very much the way the Tories have in the past had issues with too many who were homophobic & racist....now labour have similar issues with antisemitism, equality, etc.SeanT said:The Naz Shah story perpetuates a toxic narrative for Labour.
I don't for a second believe that 1% of white British Labour voters are anti-Semitic. It just doesn't exist in their core vote, or their wider British vote.
But the Labour PARTY is now infested with anti-Semitism. And the vector is: Islam.0 -
I went to East Germany once, what a beep beep. Why anybody would want to go on a motorcycle holiday there is beyond me!Charles said:
Large parts of East Germany are depopulated because of the lack of well paying jobs. The government subsidies to try and create employment there are humongousFrancisUrquhart said:
It obviously even worse, as a lot of those people will also be on tax credits.DavidL said:
That is an awful lot of people not particularly incentivised to vote for a party trying to restrict public spending.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
Over the same period the amount of income tax paid by the richest 1 per cent has risen from 24.4 per cent to 27.5 per cent, meaning that 300,000 people pay more than a quarter of the nation's income tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/26/nearly-half-of-britons-pay-no-income-tax-as-burden-on-rich-incre/
* This is clearly wrong, as there aren't 60+ million working age adults in the UK (even with the dodgy government figures)
As they kept saying in Meet the Robinsons " I am not sure that this plan has been properly thought through ,"
What it highlights to me is we clearly have far too many people being paid very little or not working, and there isn't an easy way to fix the former. Simply escalating minimum wage further won't do it. We have a huge structural imbalance, just as we do with service vs other sectors.
Would be interesting to know wage distributions in Germany. I am presuming because of a much bigger [semi]-skilled manufacturing base, those people get paid reasonably well.0 -
Was that with a London audience?Casino_Royale said:FPT
Slam dunk for Leave tonight in the Spectator debate.
There were 2,200 in the audience according to Andrew Neil. Largest in the history of the Spectator.
It was a simple show of cards at the end, adjudicated by Dan Hannan and Liz Kendal.
From what I saw I'd say 60% for Leave, 30% for Remain and 10% still undecided.
It really was very good. I'd recommend to anyone to watch it.0 -
I am not waiting. :-)TheScreamingEagles said:
Come June 23rd, we'll be able to share great tales of the stupidity of some voters on both sides.
On the same day I also had one bloke trying to convince me that the EU was both a Nazi and a Soviet plot to subjugate Britain (not sure if he meant Britain alone or the whole of Europe including Britain).
Trouble is with lots of other people around who clearly knew the bloke was talking balls you have to work out how to quietly get rid of him without a big argument in which you end up defending the EU.0 -
Did Chuka succeed in putting people off with his metro elite vibe?Casino_Royale said:FPT
Slam dunk for Leave tonight in the Spectator debate.
There were 2,200 in the audience according to Andrew Neil. Largest in the history of the Spectator.
It was a simple show of cards at the end, adjudicated by Dan Hannan and Liz Kendal.
From what I saw I'd say 60% for Leave, 30% for Remain and 10% still undecided.
It really was very good. I'd recommend to anyone to watch it.0 -
Large parts of East Germany are depopulated because they left for the west during the Cold War and just after the wall fell.Charles said:
Large parts of East Germany are depopulated because of the lack of well paying jobs. The government subsidies to try and create employment there are humongousFrancisUrquhart said:
It obviously even worse, as a lot of those people will also be on tax credits.DavidL said:
That is an awful lot of people not particularly incentivised to vote for a party trying to restrict public spending.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
Over the same period the amount of income tax paid by the richest 1 per cent has risen from 24.4 per cent to 27.5 per cent, meaning that 300,000 people pay more than a quarter of the nation's income tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/26/nearly-half-of-britons-pay-no-income-tax-as-burden-on-rich-incre/
* This is clearly wrong, as there aren't 60+ million working age adults in the UK (even with the dodgy government figures)
As they kept saying in Meet the Robinsons " I am not sure that this plan has been properly thought through ,"
What it highlights to me is we clearly have far too many people being paid very little or not working, and there isn't an easy way to fix the former. Simply escalating minimum wage further won't do it. We have a huge structural imbalance, just as we do with service vs other sectors.
Would be interesting to know wage distributions in Germany. I am presuming because of a much bigger [semi]-skilled manufacturing base, those people get paid reasonably well.
The GDR lost 2 million people before the Berlin Wall was built if I remember correctly, that was the reason why it was built.0 -
James CallaghanTheScreamingEagles said:Pop quiz PBers.
Can you name the 3 Labour Prime Ministers who had the first name James.
Gordon Brown
Ramsey MacDonald
James Scullion0 -
Put it this way, I can now see why Liz Kendall didn't become Labour leader. She was by far the poorest.MP_SE said:
Did Chuka succeed in putting people off with his metro elite vibe?Casino_Royale said:FPT
Slam dunk for Leave tonight in the Spectator debate.
There were 2,200 in the audience according to Andrew Neil. Largest in the history of the Spectator.
It was a simple show of cards at the end, adjudicated by Dan Hannan and Liz Kendal.
From what I saw I'd say 60% for Leave, 30% for Remain and 10% still undecided.
It really was very good. I'd recommend to anyone to watch it.
Chuka struck me as a bit of a sixth form debater but had his good moments and may well grow into it.
Clegg was the best and most eloquent, but lost it when asked for just 1 good reason to stay in the EU and said "strength in numbers" and was laughed at
Kate Hoey's speech was good but had a couple of brainfarts during the Q&A
Nigel Farage was passionate and convincing but his tone wasn't quite right in one or two places and came close to suggesting that the EU provoked Putin's invasion of Ukraine
Dan Hannan was consistently good, his speech and the Q&A and brought the house down
Remain very much on the defensive and Leave had the better of the arguments overall0 -
James Henry Scullion!TheScreamingEagles said:
JohnO wins!JohnO said:
Presumably MacDonald, Wilson and Brown?TheScreamingEagles said:Pop quiz PBers.
Can you name the 3 Labour Prime Ministers who had the first name James.
James Ramsay MacDonald, James Harold Wilson, and James Gordon Brown.
Leonard James Callaghan doesn't count, which is amusing as he was the only one who went by the name James.
0 -
or Jock's such as Keir Hardie.AndyJS said:
Except there weren't ever many racists in the Conservative Party. They were more likely to be found in Labour areas like the East End.FrancisUrquhart said:
It feels very much the way the Tories have in the past had issues with too many who were homophobic & racist....now labour have similar issues with antisemitism, equality, etc.SeanT said:The Naz Shah story perpetuates a toxic narrative for Labour.
I don't for a second believe that 1% of white British Labour voters are anti-Semitic. It just doesn't exist in their core vote, or their wider British vote.
But the Labour PARTY is now infested with anti-Semitism. And the vector is: Islam.
0 -
20% Rathbone clients (sponsors) and rest Spectator subscribers/general publicAndyJS said:
Was that with a London audience?Casino_Royale said:FPT
Slam dunk for Leave tonight in the Spectator debate.
There were 2,200 in the audience according to Andrew Neil. Largest in the history of the Spectator.
It was a simple show of cards at the end, adjudicated by Dan Hannan and Liz Kendal.
From what I saw I'd say 60% for Leave, 30% for Remain and 10% still undecided.
It really was very good. I'd recommend to anyone to watch it.
Must have been 90%+ white (if not more so) and about 65% of those were over 55, but with about a third who were under 45. And quite a few students.0 -
I looked over the wall into it as a break from inspecting a Siemens factory.FrancisUrquhart said:
I went to East Germany once, what a beep beep. Why anybody would want to go on a motorcycle holiday there is beyond me!Charles said:
Large parts of East Germany are depopulated because of the lack of well paying jobs. The government subsidies to try and create employment there are humongousFrancisUrquhart said:
It obviously even worse, as a lot of those people will also be on tax credits.DavidL said:
That is an awful lot of people not particularly incentivised to vote for a party trying to restrict public spending.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
Over the same period the amount of income tax paid by the richest 1 per cent has risen from 24.4 per cent to 27.5 per cent, meaning that 300,000 people pay more than a quarter of the nation's income tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/26/nearly-half-of-britons-pay-no-income-tax-as-burden-on-rich-incre/
* This is clearly wrong, as there aren't 60+ million working age adults in the UK (even with the dodgy government figures)
As they kept saying in Meet the Robinsons " I am not sure that this plan has been properly thought through ,"
What it highlights to me is we clearly have far too many people being paid very little or not working, and there isn't an easy way to fix the former. Simply escalating minimum wage further won't do it. We have a huge structural imbalance, just as we do with service vs other sectors.
Would be interesting to know wage distributions in Germany. I am presuming because of a much bigger [semi]-skilled manufacturing base, those people get paid reasonably well.
0 -
Hardie, MacDonald, Wilson, Brown.Charles said:
James CallaghanTheScreamingEagles said:Pop quiz PBers.
Can you name the 3 Labour Prime Ministers who had the first name James.
Gordon Brown
Ramsey MacDonald
James Scullion
Callaghan's first name was Leonard....0 -
-
Everyone pays VAT. You're just thinking of income tax.Indigo said:
This is idiocy, no wonder people believe in the magic money tree when they don't have to contribute to the costs of anything. If people don't pay at least a nominal amount into the running of the state, they have no appreciation for how well their money is being spent, why would they election politicians that spend the money wisely when it's other people's money.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
A "Tory" government pursuing this sort of policy is crazy, it means almost half the votes only see the downside of austerity, they don't pay any taxes so tax cuts don't mean anything to them, they just see they are getting less services. How do you interest a population in the value of being careful with the national bank balance when half of them are not footing the bill.
Much as it pains me to say it, Gordon Brown was on the right track with his starting 10% tax rate, hell make it 5% if necessary, but at least that way people feel they are making a contribution to society, and have an interest in that contribution being used wisely.0 -
There is a small possibility that it started as a soviet plot to "Finlandize" western europe , but the eurocommunists and the socialists broke off from Moscow after the Prague Spring.Richard_Tyndall said:
I am not waiting. :-)TheScreamingEagles said:
Come June 23rd, we'll be able to share great tales of the stupidity of some voters on both sides.
On the same day I also had one bloke trying to convince me that the EU was both a Nazi and a Soviet plot to subjugate Britain (not sure if he meant Britain alone or the whole of Europe including Britain).
Trouble is with lots of other people around who clearly knew the bloke was talking balls you have to work out how to quietly get rid of him without a big argument in which you end up defending the EU.0 -
Maybe June 24thTheScreamingEagles said:
Come June 23rd, we'll be able to share great tales of the stupidity of some voters on both sides.Richard_Tyndall said:
It is a claim that was repeated to me almost word for word when I was on a Leave stall in Newark a couple of weeks ago. Along with the idiocy that the EU prevented war in Europe.TheScreamingEagles said:
It was a joke, in response to DavidL's and Robert's joke.Richard_Tyndall said:
No we didn't. Even you are not dumb enough to believe that. We joined and remained the sick man of Europe until we elected a leader who was willing and able to deal with the issues. Being in the EEC at the time had Sweet FA to do with it.TheScreamingEagles said:
In the 70s we were the sick man of Europe, we then joined the EC, and miraculously stopped being the sick man of Europe.rcs1000 said:
Don't be stupid, there was no UK before the EU, merely a small barren island populated by a few starving savagesDavidL said:
You'll be telling us life went on before the EU next. And who could believe that?peter_from_putney said:
Don't forget that 10 years ago we didn't have smart phones, 20 years ago we didn't have the internet and 80 years ago we didn't have TV, let alone David Dimbleby or even his dad!Indigo said:Very interesting thanks.
I am studying the local opinion polls here in the Philippines for the General election a week on Monday, it's it going to be fascinating to see how accurate it is, as you would think on the surface they have some almost insurmountable problems in getting a representative sample.
A country of 100 million people, 54.5 million registered voters, encompassing an archipelago of some 7,641 islands. 25 million people and probably a third of the electorate live in the capital, with many more spread out amongst hundreds of small regional cities, but probably half the population living out in the "province" in small village settlements. Quite a few of those in the remotest areas won't have a television set themselves but will share one communally, and may only have 2-3 mobile phones in the extended family, and certainly won't have a landline or an internet connection. But civic pride is keenly felt, and most adults will vote.
But somehow or other we still managed to get by when General Elections came along.
Huzzah for the EC
No claim is too dumb for some Remain supporters at the moment.0 -
0-0 a very good result for City I think, just need to avoid defeat in Madrid now. A tricky order, but they effectively have the draw working for them now.0
-
I've spent time mosying around East German factories in the recent past. Just 'cos.Speedy said:
Large parts of East Germany are depopulated because they left for the west during the Cold War and just after the wall fell.Charles said:
Large parts of East Germany are depopulated because of the lack of well paying jobs. The government subsidies to try and create employment there are humongousFrancisUrquhart said:
It obviously even worse, as a lot of those people will also be on tax credits.DavidL said:
That is an awful lot of people not particularly incentivised to vote for a party trying to restrict public spending.FrancisUrquhart said:Almost half of Britons pay no income tax while the richest are now shouldering the biggest burden on record, a new analysis has found.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies said that the proportion of working-age adults who do not pay income tax has risen from 34.3 per cent to 43.8 per cent, equivalent to 30million people*.
Over the same period the amount of income tax paid by the richest 1 per cent has risen from 24.4 per cent to 27.5 per cent, meaning that 300,000 people pay more than a quarter of the nation's income tax.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/26/nearly-half-of-britons-pay-no-income-tax-as-burden-on-rich-incre/
* This is clearly wrong, as there aren't 60+ million working age adults in the UK (even with the dodgy government figures)
As they kept saying in Meet the Robinsons " I am not sure that this plan has been properly thought through ,"
What it highlights to me is we clearly have far too many people being paid very little or not working, and there isn't an easy way to fix the former. Simply escalating minimum wage further won't do it. We have a huge structural imbalance, just as we do with service vs other sectors.
Would be interesting to know wage distributions in Germany. I am presuming because of a much bigger [semi]-skilled manufacturing base, those people get paid reasonably well.
The GDR lost 2 million people before the Berlin Wall was built if I remember correctly, that was the reason why it was built.
Management complain about the lack of young people who want to stick around. They all head West to the cities0 -
Stop trolling.TheScreamingEagles said:0 -
Great debut thread Pulpstar!0
-
Big_G_NorthWales said:
Maybe June 24th
Mind you there'll be no exit poll, so we're going to have to wait for the first result declared to give us something concrete to talk about.0 -
0
-
0
-
Poor game - they both showed little flair and Ronaldo not playing was a big bonus for City. I would agree that any draw apart from 0-0 would see City throughPulpstar said:0-0 a very good result for City I think, just need to avoid defeat in Madrid now. A tricky order, but they effectively have the draw working for them now.
0 -
Well so far the leaks from the media say that Indiana may not matter anymore due to Trump's strength tonight.
No Exit Poll leaks yet.0 -
Spectator blog of debate here:
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/04/live-from-the-london-palladium-the-spectators-brexit-debate/0 -
Everyone loves Grandpa MunsterMaxPB said:0 -
I hope they tease the 'blonde news anchor' breakdown.Speedy said:No Exit Poll leaks yet.
0 -
Scott Adams called 2012 for Mitt Romney by a landslide IIRC.DavidL said:
That is a really good link. Spot on in my opinion (checks again slips for Trump for POTUS).LondonBob said:
Scott Adams called it.Pulpstar said:Trump to be interviewed by Megyn Kelly.
Lol
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/143431313681/the-unfavorability-illusion0 -
Indiana will definitely matter.Speedy said:Well so far the leaks from the media say that Indiana may not matter anymore due to Trump's strength tonight.
No Exit Poll leaks yet.
Trump will go into CA knowing that 172 delegates would see him home and zero delegates would send him home.
0 -
0
-
But i am tender hooks here waiting to find out how Korean lesiban vegans voted...Speedy said:Well so far the leaks from the media say that Indiana may not matter anymore due to Trump's strength tonight.
No Exit Poll leaks yet.0 -
If Bernie wins Connecticut and maybe others he won't be able to suspend his campaign yet.Speedy said:Hello Exit Poll leak:
It looks like Trump will have the nomination sewn up before Hillary.0 -
Daily mail have gone with front page of naz shah.0
-
More details:
Steve Kornacki @SteveKornacki 2m2 minutes ago
PA Dem electorate:
White 71%
Black 17%
Latino/Hispanic 9%
Asian 1%
Maryland Dem electorate:
43% white
46% black
6% Latino/Hispanic
2% Asian
CT Dem electorate:
76% white
14% black
7% Latino/Hispanic
1% Asian
Since Sanders is leading by 2.6% in Connecticut, Pennsylvania might have Hillary ahead by 3.0 -
I wonder what the idiots who awarded him that prize think. It was.bonker at the time, let alone on hindsight.SeanT said:
Actually, yeah, that is good news. One of the major candidates for US prez says Obama is talking bollocks.Speedy said:
Stop trolling.TheScreamingEagles said:
Given that the narcissist wanker Obama is now as popular in the UK a dose of genital warts that's good for LEAVE.
Has Obama put his Nobel Peace Prize in a museum yet? I'm trying to remember what he got it for?.
Syria? Libya? Afghanistan? Anyone?0 -
Leave need to make sure Dan Hannan is centre stage in the TV debates.0
-
Spoilsport.Alistair said:
Scott Adams called 2012 for Mitt Romney by a landslide IIRC.DavidL said:
That is a really good link. Spot on in my opinion (checks again slips for Trump for POTUS).LondonBob said:
Scott Adams called it.Pulpstar said:Trump to be interviewed by Megyn Kelly.
Lol
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/143431313681/the-unfavorability-illusion0 -
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2015/12/20/pulpstar-on-the-republican-nomination/Casino_Royale said:Great debut thread Pulpstar!
*Cough*0 -
Penn. GOP Exit poll:
Who should be the nominee?
Primary winner 70%
Best Candidate 28%.
Looks good for Trump.
Candidate with most votes 69% (91% with Trump voters, 41% non Trump)
Delegates choose 28%. (8% with Trump voters, 55% with non Trump)
That doesn't look good for Trump.0 -
"Justice is truth in action" - Disraeli0 -
Right, I'm off to bed.
Predictions:
PA, Trump 56%, Cruz 20%, Kasich 24% (Trump wins 17/17)
CT, Trump 58%, Cruz 16%, Kasich 24% (Trump wins all)
RI, Trump 59%, Cruz 14%, Kasich 25% (Trump wins 10 [2+8])
DE, Trump 60%, Cruz 18%, Kasich 19% (Trump wins)
MD, Trump 49%, Cruz 23%, Kasich 25% (Trump to win all. I disagree with Pulps about geographic variability)
Ergo a very good night for Mr Trump is on the cards. Indeed it would have to be a major upset not to be a very good victory on current polling.
0 -
Hannan at his best. He has become a fine orator.Casino_Royale said:
0 -
This amounts to an exit poll with Trump on 56% of the vote.Speedy said:Penn. GOP Exit poll:
Candidate with most votes 69% (91% with Trump voters, 41% non Trump)
Delegates choose 28%. (8% with Trump voters, 55% with non Trump)0 -
Give over.SeanT said:Ouch. Naz Shah on the front page of the Mail. As an anti-Semite
https://twitter.com/MediaGuido/status/725070323842994177
Surely she cannot survive as an MP. If she does, then Labour will be damaged further
It's the word "transportation" that does it. How can you possibly use that word in reference to moving Jews, without realising the evil connotations?
Does that go for the Jews who were transported to Israel?0 -
Re. the income tax thing -
In 1914 about 7% of the population paid income tax, less than 20% of workers did just before WWII
0 -
Correct.TheWhiteRabbit said:
This amounts to an exit poll with Trump on 56% of the vote.Speedy said:Penn. GOP Exit poll:
Candidate with most votes 69% (91% with Trump voters, 41% non Trump)
Delegates choose 28%. (8% with Trump voters, 55% with non Trump)0 -
I wonder what EU plot they are talking about?TheScreamingEagles said:twitter.com/suttonnick/status/725073901248778240
0 -
So this is how it works from here: Spurs win no more games this season and finish 4th; City win the CL and Liverpool the UEFA Cup; Spurs miss out on CL qualification. The only way to stop this happening is for me to put a decent amount of money on it. I know my Spurs.0
-
0
-
The tactics and strategy to ensure victory in the EUReferendumRobD said:
I wonder what EU plot they are talking about?TheScreamingEagles said:twitter.com/suttonnick/status/725073901248778240
0 -
More from the Exit Polls:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/live-republican-primary-exit-poll-analysis/story?id=38654929
" Early deciders: Nearly six in 10 GOP primary voters across today’s primaries say they decided on their candidate more than a month ago, on pace to break the record of 55 percent in New York last week, and much more than the average in primaries to date. Trump has dominated among early deciders in previous contests. "0 -
Anyhoo, the big story will be about what's not on the front page of The Sun.0
-
Is this stuff that is required by law to be published after the campaign?TheScreamingEagles said:
The tactics and strategy to ensure victory in the EUReferendumRobD said:
I wonder what EU plot they are talking about?TheScreamingEagles said:twitter.com/suttonnick/status/725073901248778240
0 -
He brought the house down. He was absolutely fantastic. Just listen to the cheers drowning him out as he speaks.TCPoliticalBetting said:
Incidentally, Leave have started to listen to me: both Kate Hoey and Dan Hannan were using the own goals from Remain higher wages (Rose) and lower food prices (Ashdown) lines against them.
At last.
0 -
Got to say I am very pleased it was Obama in the White House from 2009 and not John McCain. There was nothing inevitable about the global economy not going into a complete death spiral after the crash.0
-
YupRobD said:
Is this stuff that is required by law to be published after the campaign?TheScreamingEagles said:
The tactics and strategy to ensure victory in the EUReferendumRobD said:
I wonder what EU plot they are talking about?TheScreamingEagles said:twitter.com/suttonnick/status/725073901248778240
0 -
Super is not as super as it used to be....Speedy said:Not another "Tuesday".
At least it's not "Super Tuesday IV" like on CNN.0 -
He also called 2008 for McCain.DavidL said:
Spoilsport.Alistair said:
Scott Adams called 2012 for Mitt Romney by a landslide IIRC.DavidL said:
That is a really good link. Spot on in my opinion (checks again slips for Trump for POTUS).LondonBob said:
Scott Adams called it.Pulpstar said:Trump to be interviewed by Megyn Kelly.
Lol
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/143431313681/the-unfavorability-illusion0 -
No secret to anyone with a brain what Remain are doing.TheScreamingEagles said:
The tactics and strategy to ensure victory in the EUReferendumRobD said:
I wonder what EU plot they are talking about?TheScreamingEagles said:twitter.com/suttonnick/status/725073901248778240
0 -
I doubt there is anything they could do to redeem themselves on that front. Still, not mentioning at all seems a bit like sticking your head in the sand.TheScreamingEagles said:Anyhoo, the big story will be about what's not on the front page of The Sun.
0 -
Christ, I've just unrepressed Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.
With Nuclear fecking Man0 -
No mention of Hillsbrough on the Sun front page then.0
-
If Naz Shah resigns it'll be another opportunity for Galloway to return to parliament as MP for Bradford West.0
-
Project Fact and The Long Term Economic PlanCasino_Royale said:
No secret to anyone with a brain what Remain are doing.TheScreamingEagles said:
The tactics and strategy to ensure victory in the EUReferendumRobD said:
I wonder what EU plot they are talking about?TheScreamingEagles said:twitter.com/suttonnick/status/725073901248778240
0 -
Lol!TheScreamingEagles said:Christ, I've just unrepressed Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.
With Nuclear fecking Man
When I was about ten Superman III was probably my favourite film, despite being absolutely terrified by the scene where the supercomputer turns the woman into an evil robot.
Saw it again last year and realised how truly awful it was.0 -
Paulson did a decent job, although he was too close to Goldman for decencySouthamObserver said:Got to say I am very pleased it was Obama in the White House from 2009 and not John McCain. There was nothing inevitable about the global economy not going into a complete death spiral after the crash.
0 -
Superman II for meCasino_Royale said:
Lol!TheScreamingEagles said:Christ, I've just unrepressed Superman IV: The Quest for Peace.
With Nuclear fecking Man
When I was about ten Superman III was probably my favourite film, despite being absolutely terrified by the scene where the supercomputer turns the woman into an evil robot.
Saw it again last year and realised how truly awful it was.0 -
they are becoming a Muslim only brand Suits decent parties.SeanT said:The Naz Shah story perpetuates a toxic narrative for Labour.
I don't for a second believe that 1% of white British Labour voters are anti-Semitic. It just doesn't exist in their core vote, or their wider British vote.
But the Labour PARTY is now infested with anti-Semitism. And the vector is: Islam.0 -
Pah.TheScreamingEagles said:
Project Fact and The Long Term Economic PlanCasino_Royale said:
No secret to anyone with a brain what Remain are doing.TheScreamingEagles said:
The tactics and strategy to ensure victory in the EUReferendumRobD said:
I wonder what EU plot they are talking about?TheScreamingEagles said:twitter.com/suttonnick/status/725073901248778240
Listen to Dan Hannan's Project Inspiration and The Long Term British Plan.0 -
I think David Herdson earlier today had a point on some of the points he made wrt the outcome.TheScreamingEagles said:Anyhoo, the big story will be about what's not on the front page of The Sun.
But the Sun's headline was clearly disgraceful. They could have done well to just print.,. "sorry"0 -
PA GOP exit, If person X is the nominee:
Trump
Definitely vote for: 56%
Probably vote for: 20
Not vote for: 22
Cruz
Def 25%
Prob 36%
Not 37%
This tells me that Trump should be around 50% in Pennsylvania.
Cruz at mid 20's.
Why is there a NeverTrump but not a NeverCruz ?0 -
Good evening.
It looks like The Donald will win all 5 states tonight. Being tired I'll peruse the results tomorrow morning.
https://twitter.com/FiveThirtyEight/status/7250761217510154250 -
At what point does a party infested with anti-Semites become an anti-Semitic party?SeanT said:The Naz Shah story perpetuates a toxic narrative for Labour.
I don't for a second believe that 1% of white British Labour voters are anti-Semitic. It just doesn't exist in their core vote, or their wider British vote.
But the Labour PARTY is now infested with anti-Semitism. And the vector is: Islam.0 -
Nor on the front page of The Times.TheScreamingEagles said:Anyhoo, the big story will be about what's not on the front page of The Sun.
A coincidence I'm sure.0