Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

As we head to the Batley and Spen count a reminder of the last two general elections here – politica

124»

Comments

  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557

    Galloway's campaign manager says he said he expects to him to pull 6k-7k votes ... which would NOT place them second in an election where 37,786 people have voted.

    But, based on 2019 support, 6k-7k votes would certainly be enough to lose Labour the seat.

    https://twitter.com/REWearmouth/status/1410775101272952835?s=20

    It's been 95% certain for a long time that Galloway would cost Labour the seat in my opinion.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557

    Galloway's campaign manager says he said he expects to him to pull 6k-7k votes ... which would NOT place them second in an election where 37,786 people have voted.

    But, based on 2019 support, 6k-7k votes would certainly be enough to lose Labour the seat.

    https://twitter.com/REWearmouth/status/1410775101272952835?s=20

    Maybe they mean 6-7k votes in their strongest areas only?
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894
    Betfair.
    Con 1.18 (1.25 to lay)
    Lab 4.5 (6.4 to lay)
    GGWP 42 (100 to lay)

    The large gaps between back and lay prices, as well as the gap between Labour and Conservative (a 109% book) show what an illiquid market this is.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153
    Andy_JS said:

    As above, Labour got 55.5% in 2017. The party hasn't been that high in Hartlepool since 2001.

    Albeit some of that may be Jo Cox sympathy related.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557

    Betfair.
    Con 1.18 (1.25 to lay)
    Lab 4.5 (6.4 to lay)
    GGWP 42 (100 to lay)

    The large gaps between back and lay prices, as well as the gap between Labour and Conservative (a 109% book) show what an illiquid market this is.

    It's disappointing. Difficult to take advantage of the changing situation with so little money available.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894
    Andy_JS said:

    Betfair.
    Con 1.18 (1.25 to lay)
    Lab 4.5 (6.4 to lay)
    GGWP 42 (100 to lay)

    The large gaps between back and lay prices, as well as the gap between Labour and Conservative (a 109% book) show what an illiquid market this is.

    It's disappointing. Difficult to take advantage of the changing situation with so little money available.
    For whatever reason, this by-election has never really taken off as a betting medium.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,991
    Galloway having a twitter spat with BritainElects.
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    Andy_JS said:

    Betfair.
    Con 1.18 (1.25 to lay)
    Lab 4.5 (6.4 to lay)
    GGWP 42 (100 to lay)

    The large gaps between back and lay prices, as well as the gap between Labour and Conservative (a 109% book) show what an illiquid market this is.

    It's disappointing. Difficult to take advantage of the changing situation with so little money available.
    For whatever reason, this by-election has never really taken off as a betting medium.
    Chesham and Amersham was a far bigger betting market by scale of 4 or 5
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Jon Craig (Sky):

    "All the predictions here are that the Conservatives have won"
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557
    edited July 2021

    Galloway having a twitter spat with BritainElects.

    What about? Edit: had a look, it's an article comparing B&S with Hartlepool.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557
    As already reported, Sky News' correspondent saying fairly clear the Tories have won.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Jon Craig saying if bad for Lab tonight then Starmer is in deep trouble and facing a crucial 48 hours - must not bungle his response like he did after Hartlepool.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,991
    edited July 2021
    Craig making it sound like the only uncertainty now is just how badly Labour have done....
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557
    MikeL said:

    Jon Craig (Sky):

    "All the predictions here are that the Conservatives have won"

    The truth is Galloway only needed to take a couple of thousand of votes from Labour to make it almost impossible for them to win this election.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    edited July 2021
    Tiny money but now:

    Con 1.16/1.17
    Lab 6.6/7

    May just be in response to Craig.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894
    MikeL said:

    Tiny money but now:

    Con 1.16/1.17
    Lab 6.6/7

    May just be in response to Craig.

    Probably. I was just looking at GGWP and wondering if I wanted to lay £10 at 100 for an easy pick-up when a more decisive layer grabbed it. I'll leave the £12 at 220.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,627
    New South Wales, which includes Sydney, reports 31 local coronavirus cases, the biggest one-day increase since April 2020

    https://twitter.com/bnodesk/status/1410783163937402881
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894
    rcs1000 said:

    MJW said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    TimS said:

    We continue the red wall / blue wall divide. 2 nations: https://twitter.com/BritainElects/status/1410734008539836419?s=20

    The Blue Wall isn't voting Labour though. The LDs are the beneficiaries.
    That's the danger for the Labour Party: they end up ineffectual in the South, and losing in the North - potentially a very unhealthy distribution of votes.
    Could be very true. But there's also probably a sweet spot for Labour (if Starmer's ratings improve and it gets its act together a bit, but it doesn't need to be Blair 90s level - just "well you don't sound so bad") where it picks off some of the easier 'red wall' seats by virtue of not having Jez and general disgruntlement with a government that has to do its fiscal cleanup work at the back end of a parliament and is disliked by working age voters, makes advances in the south and suburbs, and the Lib Dems make major inroads in the South East and West. As Stephen Bush pointed out, ta big indicator of Lib Dem success in a GE is whether the Labour leader is seen as broadly acceptable by lots of Tory voters, and so if they're annoyed with the government (obviously since 2016, the biggest example of that is liberal Tory remainers), they can happily vote Lib Dem safe in the knowledge they're not going to get a government they can't stand, and might, with a bit of luck, get one that's fairly attentive to them.

    May well not be the case. If Labour carries on tearing itself to shreds it won't be. But hardly implausible, even in a scenario where Starmer's ratings don't tick up that much and the government avoids the worst scandals and pitfalls but just gets gradually seen as not living up to its big promises and as not being very good.

    That doesn't win Labour a majority but it could, on a good night remove most if not all of the Tories'. Which I suspect they'd have taken at any point since December 2019.
    Good points.
    Except that Starmer not being Corbyn might not be enough to pick up Red Wall seats. Starmer might even be worse.

    If we imagine a stereotypical Red Wall voter to be someone who is proud of her class, her culture and her country, what does the posh London lawyer taking the knee offer her? He is even worse than the Venezuela and Palestine-obsessed Jeremy Corbyn. At least he stayed on his feet and would talk to crowds of workers and harangue the government about buses.

    She is worried about the decline in the town's (and region's) economy and the lack of prospects for her children. What policy does Kier Starmer propose that might possibly help? Boris at least talks a good game about levelling up.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557
    I don't know how influential Owen Jones is in Labour circles, but he indicated yesterday that he would be calling for a leadership election if Labour loses the by-election.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,991
    edited July 2021
    Andy_JS said:

    I don't know how influential Owen Jones is in Labour circles, but he indicated yesterday that he would be calling for a leadership election if Labour loses the by-election.

    Britain Elects guy (who also writes for the New Statesman) on his live stream this evening pooh-poohed any talk that Starmer will be going anywhere.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894

    Andy_JS said:

    I don't know how influential Owen Jones is in Labour circles, but he indicated yesterday that he would be calling for a leadership election if Labour loses the by-election.

    Britain Elects guy (who also writes for the New Statesman) on his live stream this evening pooh-poohed any talk that Starmer will be going anywhere.
    He is probably right. The left does not have enough votes to unseat Starmer on its own, and there is no obvious alternative candidate from any wing of the party. Favourite as next Labour leader is Andy Burnham who is not even an MP, and nor is Sadiq Khan.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,153

    Andy_JS said:

    Betfair.
    Con 1.18 (1.25 to lay)
    Lab 4.5 (6.4 to lay)
    GGWP 42 (100 to lay)

    The large gaps between back and lay prices, as well as the gap between Labour and Conservative (a 109% book) show what an illiquid market this is.

    It's disappointing. Difficult to take advantage of the changing situation with so little money available.
    For whatever reason, this by-election has never really taken off as a betting medium.
    Chesham and Amersham was a far bigger betting market by scale of 4 or 5
    Apparently some internet tipster had been really pushing the LibDems, which may have been a factor.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,991
    Even less scientific than our earlier statements but looking at the piles of votes alone our on the ground team are tentatively calling this for Labour

    https://twitter.com/Yorkshire_Party/status/1410791145190432770?s=20
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Money for Lab!

    Con 1.3
    Lab 4
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894
    edited July 2021
    Conservatives are drifting back out on Betfair. Now 1.3 Con, and 4 Labour.

    Edit: make that 2.7 Labour. More (and different) news from the count?
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Finally looks like someone with real information is betting.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,991
    Doesn't look like any party has swept this. Unless a huge bundle of votes is about to be whacked on a table somewhere this may be tight.

    https://twitter.com/tomhfh/status/1410792113193762825?s=20
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,991
    I wonder where Jon Craig got his info that it was all over bar the shouting between Galloway and eveybody else?
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894
    rcs1000 said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Betfair.
    Con 1.18 (1.25 to lay)
    Lab 4.5 (6.4 to lay)
    GGWP 42 (100 to lay)

    The large gaps between back and lay prices, as well as the gap between Labour and Conservative (a 109% book) show what an illiquid market this is.

    It's disappointing. Difficult to take advantage of the changing situation with so little money available.
    For whatever reason, this by-election has never really taken off as a betting medium.
    Chesham and Amersham was a far bigger betting market by scale of 4 or 5
    Apparently some internet tipster had been really pushing the LibDems, which may have been a factor.
    It might be that some layers got badly burnt at Chesham and Amersham and have left the field of play.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Money all for Lab.

    2.66 just taken.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,991
    Labour piles are looking chunky.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894
    MikeL said:

    Money all for Lab.

    2.66 just taken.

    Both parties odds-on. It won't last.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Sky just showed tables.

    Con look marginally ahead - but far too close to be sure.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Craig: "Getting tense!"
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557
    Sky News still saying Tories ahead, although maybe by not as much as before.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,991
    Tom ItsComingHomewood
    @tomhfh
    ·
    22s
    From where I’m standing I’m not convinced the Labour piles are smaller than the Tory piles.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,557
    edited July 2021

    Tom ItsComingHomewood
    @tomhfh
    ·
    22s
    From where I’m standing I’m not convinced the Labour piles are smaller than the Tory piles.

    No offence to Tom Harwood but I don't think he's very experienced at this sort thing. I heard him talking yesterday and he was surprised that at by-elections people sometimes attach posters to lampposts, which is something that's been going on in my area for ages. Clearly he hasn't been to many by-elections before, which isn't surprising since he's only about 25.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Craig still talking as if Con has won and what happens to Starmer if Lab loses.

    Feels as if Craig is driving Betfair.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,706
    Ayesha Hazarika:

    "Just had a message that it's tightening with last few bundles"
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    New thread

  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,894
    Meanwhile, the Daily Star reports on Le [sic] Close Encounters between aliens and the French air force.

    UFOs in ‘dogfights with military jets above France’ in 600 sightings, shock report says
    https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/ufos-dogfights-military-jets-above-24442061
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,661
    Who is funding Galloway?
This discussion has been closed.