Regarding the Social Care side of his former ministry, in his resignation letter Matt Hancock cited "'The reforms we have started in the health system" and stated that "we will fix the problems in social care once and for all."
So apparently all his successor need to is follow the policies, planning and trail already blazed under Hancock's watch. Heck, even yours truly could do that!
May the spirit and wisdom of Lord Woolton guide Sajid Javid as head of DHSC.
I say this sincerely. because somehow I doubt that the problems of social care are unlikely to be solved definitively and permanently under the premiership of Boris Johnson. Even IF he was Winston Churchill and Clement Attlee combined.
EDIT - First in bore, first in place, last in the hearts of his fellow PBers . . .
Re the colorful nature of the current HMG frontbench, reckon this is one of the great unsung success stories in British politics and society. Beyond individual achievement, a success for their families, communities, the Conservative Party and the whole freaking somewhat occasionally United Kingdom.
Arguably the biggest problem facing the Conservatives (and the country) is that Boris Johnson is carrying over his approach to personal finances into the public arena. Even occasionally blurring the two.
We are on a spending splurge. Andrew Neil has brilliantly commented that the Government's credit card may have to be taken away.
It's not just a splurge. It's a chaotic one. There's no consistency or strategy to the levelling up process and vanity projects - that thing beloved of Johnson - are to the fore. Remember that this is the guy who wanted to build a brand new London airport in the Thames estuary. He loves to spend, spend, spend.
Arguably the biggest problem facing the Conservatives (and the country) is that Boris Johnson is carrying over his approach to personal finances into the public arena. Even occasionally blurring the two.
We are on a spending splurge. Andrew Neil has brilliantly commented that the Government's credit card may have to be taken away.
It's not just a splurge. It's a chaotic one. There's no consistency or strategy to the levelling up process and vanity projects - that thing beloved of Johnson - are to the fore. Remember that this is the guy who wanted to build a brand new London airport in the Thames estuary. He loves to spend, spend, spend.
Arguably the biggest problem facing the Conservatives (and the country) is that Boris Johnson is carrying over his approach to personal finances into the public arena. Even occasionally blurring the two.
We are on a spending splurge. Andrew Neil has brilliantly commented that the Government's credit card may have to be taken away.
It's not just a splurge. It's a chaotic one. There's no consistency or strategy to the levelling up process and vanity projects - that thing beloved of Johnson - are to the fore. Remember that this is the guy who wanted to build a brand new London airport in the Thames estuary. He loves to spend, spend, spend.
I don't think that's a very smart response. It's about the spending splurge. The country's finances are in a parlous state.
I'm not sure left-right comes into it, except to note that this is (in some ways) the most leftwing Government of my lifetime. Nationalisation, statism, high spending, plans to build all over the southern green belt, vanity projects, higher business taxes and a raid on people's pensions.
By 2025, we will have three million more higher rate taxpayers than in 2010. Corporation tax is heading to its highest level since 1989. The tax burden is rising to its highest since the Sixties. Our debt is at its highest since the early Sixties. And, according to last week's ONS figures, borrowing in the year to March (as a percentage of GDP) has reached a level last seen in the Second World War.
And The Guardian, Sun and Evening Standard have all written about these problems in recent days and probably others too.
Ken Clarke was scathing about the governments attitude to spending, just last week.
Meanwhile I see that the Handycock camera footage was regular office CCTV with the footage having been obtained by a disgruntled employee of the department who saw him or herself as a whistleblower.
F1: bit groggy but Tsunoda, at the moment, doesn't appear to have a penalty for impeding Bottas. Mildly surprised. Will peruse the markets for things worth backing.
Been thinking of trying to alter my strategy sometimes, and go for more tips with lower stakes. May or may not do that today.
F1: bit groggy but Tsunoda, at the moment, doesn't appear to have a penalty for impeding Bottas. Mildly surprised. Will peruse the markets for things worth backing.
Been thinking of trying to alter my strategy sometimes, and go for more tips with lower stakes. May or may not do that today.
The market is basically 8/13 Verstappen; 2/1 Hamilton; 20/1 bar. Or 62% Verstappen; 33% Hamilton. If you can rule out one or both of those, that is a huge chunk of the market gone, with massive value somewhere else.
F1: bit groggy but Tsunoda, at the moment, doesn't appear to have a penalty for impeding Bottas. Mildly surprised. Will peruse the markets for things worth backing.
Been thinking of trying to alter my strategy sometimes, and go for more tips with lower stakes. May or may not do that today.
Err, yes he does. Three place drop, he starts 11th, and Goerge Russell 10th.
If they collided and took one another out on lap 1 I'd probably put Bottas favourite.
Incidentally, Ladbrokes doesn't have each way for the winner, which is a shade disappointing. I suppose it's a reaction to last year's Hamilton dominance becoming a top 2 dominance.
Speaking of collisions that spectator-induced TdF crash yesterday was pretty shocking. She was looking in the direction of the camera and not at the riders.
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
To the extent Jews are an ethnic minority, yes, but that is a controversial question in the Jewish community. It might be easier just to say they were Jewish, and fudge whether that means by religion, ethnicity or community. Disraeli was our first (and only) Jewish Prime Minister, but he regarded himself as Anglican. His family was Jewish, but his family was also Italian and no-one says Disraeli was Britain's first Italian Prime Minister.
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
Interesting, isn't it, how this piece ignores Jewish immigrants in favour of ones who, presumably, look a bit more properly coloured up.
Just another variety of anti-semitism going on here? The subtext of it buys into the notion that they're not as deserving of the (vomit-inducing) smug self congratulations because they must have money hoarded away somewhere. Let's parade our son of a Pakistani bus driver rather than those whose families are sitting on mountains of Rothschild gold. (Neatly ignoring the fact that in reality many of them had narrowly escaped the concentrations camps.)
It takes me back to that hideous old bat Anne Widdecombe and her clearly anti-semitic attack on Michael Howard. He apparently had 'something of the night' about him. Naked anti-semitism. He was portrayed on at least one front page as a Fagin figure. I'm just surprised they didn't go the whole hog and picture him drinking the blood of virgins before returning to his casket at dawn.
Edited extra bit: Gasly to win group 1 (Leclerc, Ricciardo, Alonso) at 2.3 Vettel to win group 2 (Sainz, Stroll, Tsunoda) at 4.5 Winner without the big 4, Norris at 1.53 Over 17.5 classified finishers, 2.5 Russell points, 2.25
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
Interesting, isn't it, how this piece ignores Jewish immigrants in favour of ones who, presumably, look a bit more properly coloured up.
Just another variety of anti-semitism going on here? The subtext of it buys into the notion that they're not as deserving of the (vomit-inducing) smug self congratulations because they must have money hoarded away somewhere. Let's parade our son of a Pakistani bus driver rather than those whose families are sitting on mountains of Rothschild gold. (Neatly ignoring the fact that in reality many of them had narrowly escaped the concentrations camps.)
It takes me back to that hideous old bat Anne Widdecombe and her clearly anti-semitic attack on Michael Howard. He apparently had 'something of the night' about him. Naked anti-semitism. He was portrayed on at least one front page as a Fagin figure. I'm just surprised they didn't go the whole hog and picture him drinking the blood of virgins before returning to his casket at dawn.
The fagin figure stuff was from Labour ads. No doubt it played well in the likes of Batley and Spen.
Re Javid - I think a good appointment and a fair and well-balanced header - is someone impersonating TSE today?
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
Disraeli was our first (and only) Jewish Prime Minister, but he regarded himself as Anglican. His family was Jewish, but his family was also Italian and no-one says Disraeli was Britain's first Italian Prime Minister.
And Javid is a non-practising Muslim.
The real problem with this piece is that it mentions the issue at all. It's a can of worms which TSE doesn't appear sufficiently sensitive to tackle.
And frankly I really hope we don't go the direction of the US on race. Once the card is played it's very difficult to un-play it.
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
Interesting, isn't it, how this piece ignores Jewish immigrants in favour of ones who, presumably, look a bit more properly coloured up.
Just another variety of anti-semitism going on here? The subtext of it buys into the notion that they're not as deserving of the (vomit-inducing) smug self congratulations because they must have money hoarded away somewhere. Let's parade our son of a Pakistani bus driver rather than those whose families are sitting on mountains of Rothschild gold. (Neatly ignoring the fact that in reality many of them had narrowly escaped the concentrations camps.)
It takes me back to that hideous old bat Anne Widdecombe and her clearly anti-semitic attack on Michael Howard. He apparently had 'something of the night' about him. Naked anti-semitism. He was portrayed on at least one front page as a Fagin figure. I'm just surprised they didn't go the whole hog and picture him drinking the blood of virgins before returning to his casket at dawn.
The fagin figure stuff was from Labour ads. No doubt it played well in the likes of Batley and Spen.
Re Javid - I think a good appointment
Agree about Javid.
And you're quite right about the Fagin and pig posters. Alastair Campbell was behind them.
I think Ann Widdecombe set the idea in motion though with her 'something of the night' remarks.
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
To the extent Jews are an ethnic minority, yes, but that is a controversial question in the Jewish community. It might be easier just to say they were Jewish, and fudge whether that means by religion, ethnicity or community. Disraeli was our first (and only) Jewish Prime Minister, but he regarded himself as Anglican. His family was Jewish, but his family was also Italian and no-one says Disraeli was Britain's first Italian Prime Minister.
He was also quite happy to call himself a Jew when he wished, as when he withered Daniel O’Connell for his anti-Semitic remarks by commenting ‘when your ancestors were painted blue with woad, mine were priests in the Temples of Solomon.’
Speaking of collisions that spectator-induced TdF crash yesterday was pretty shocking. She was looking in the direction of the camera and not at the riders.
So far as I can make out, the fan was not watching the race; the cyclists were not watching the race; the commentators were not watching the race. So it is a remarkable achievement of the cycling lobby to have scored so many SPotY wins.
The sign said, in a mixture of French and German, Go Granny & Grandad (Allez Opi Omi). At least the fan can be pretty sure her grandparents will have seen her greeting, so job done!
If I was a Tory (which thank the Lord I'm not sir....) I wouldn't be worried about deckchairs on the Titanic but the monster of a loose cannon that's bouncing all over the ship.
Boris Johnson doesn't appear to have any idea what he signed up to when he entered his Faustian pact making him Prime Minister and Dominic Cummings the most powerful man in the land.
They call him Rasputin but that doesn't do him justice. To sell Brexit to 52% of a population against the forces of government parliament academia business and the media makes him a genius that not even the greatest minds could match.
This is not a person any sane man would cross. This is Anton Chigurth in No Country for Old Men. A man who gets his man.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
As alluded to on the other thread, that is what makes this seem so unsatisfactory, and also undermines any claim of whistleblowing. Matt Hancock was brought down by an on-camera snog. Not because he caused thousands of deaths in care homes, or wasted billions on a failed track and trace system, or possible corruption in no-bid contracts. Nor do we give him credit for the vaccination programme.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
As alluded to on the other thread, that is what makes this seem so unsatisfactory, and also undermines any claim of whistleblowing. Matt Hancock was brought down by an on-camera snog. Not because he caused thousands of deaths in care homes, or wasted billions on a failed track and trace system, or possible corruption in no-bid contracts. Nor do we give him credit for the vaccination programme.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
Family lunch yesterday. Among those present was a senior NHS manager, who opined that in the NHS Hancock and his lady-friend's conduct would have been categorised as 'gross misconduct'.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
The issue around the appointment and the conflicts of interest is of more importance from a governance perspective as is the fact that he was breaking rules he drew up and lectured the rest of about endlessly.
Who knows what the state of the marriage was? Today it's in ashes. But we can all feel a yuck factor in the treatment of young children. There are not just his three but hers as well. All young and all finding their lives turned upside down.
That is very sad. You can stop being a husband or wife. You cannot stop being a parent.
Support for Scottish independence has slipped in recent months, according to a poll that suggests Yes voters would fall short of a majority if a referendum were held tomorrow.
The findings of a Panelbase poll carried out for The Sunday Times indicates that, excluding “don’t knows”, 48 per cent would back independence, down four points since April when support for breaking up the Union stood at 52 per cent. Support for the Union in today’s poll is 52 per cent, up four points.
Canny Scottish electorate - keep Westminster on their toes by returning SNP administrations, keep Holyrood on its toes by prevaricating over independence. They have both where they want them.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
As alluded to on the other thread, that is what makes this seem so unsatisfactory, and also undermines any claim of whistleblowing. Matt Hancock was brought down by an on-camera snog. Not because he caused thousands of deaths in care homes, or wasted billions on a failed track and trace system, or possible corruption in no-bid contracts. Nor do we give him credit for the vaccination programme.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
Family lunch yesterday. Among those present was a senior NHS manager, who opined that in the NHS Hancock and his lady-friend's conduct would have been categorised as 'gross misconduct'.
Agreed. Misconduct, and seriously gross.
Although that said, on every level this is much less serious than the care homes Covid disaster, or indeed the DfE/DoH guidance to schools.
Javid presumably moves back into the next leader sweepstakes.
The list of papabiles is actually quite long now.
Rishi Patel Truss Hunt Javid Gove Raab
I don’t think the latter two have a chance, but both probably still harbour ambitions.
Raab obviously too palefaced for consideration by TSE, but also the child of an immigrant (his jewish father was evacuated from Czechoslovakia in 1938)
Sorry I gave you a chronic illness, I'm leaving you.
I suspect that's what did for him on the backbenches and in their constituencies ' "foolish fling and need time to heal with my family" could have seen him either hang on or after a time on the back benches return to front line politics - he's now finished for good.
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
Interesting, isn't it, how this piece ignores Jewish immigrants in favour of ones who, presumably, look a bit more properly coloured up.
Just another variety of anti-semitism going on here? The subtext of it buys into the notion that they're not as deserving of the (vomit-inducing) smug self congratulations because they must have money hoarded away somewhere. Let's parade our son of a Pakistani bus driver rather than those whose families are sitting on mountains of Rothschild gold. (Neatly ignoring the fact that in reality many of them had narrowly escaped the concentrations camps.)
It takes me back to that hideous old bat Anne Widdecombe and her clearly anti-semitic attack on Michael Howard. He apparently had 'something of the night' about him. Naked anti-semitism. He was portrayed on at least one front page as a Fagin figure. I'm just surprised they didn't go the whole hog and picture him drinking the blood of virgins before returning to his casket at dawn.
The fagin figure stuff was from Labour ads. No doubt it played well in the likes of Batley and Spen.
Re Javid - I think a good appointment
Agree about Javid.
And you're quite right about the Fagin and pig posters. Alastair Campbell was behind them.
I think Ann Widdecombe set the idea in motion though with her 'something of the night' remarks.
The thing about anti-semitism is that I think it is so ingrained in the human psyche that many people end up being anti-Semitic without even realising it. There is obviously often a bit of a link between “Jewish/Semitic features” and a perception of shiftiness/“something of the night” call it what you like. I realised this when I first saw a picture of Disraeli at the National Gallery when I was young (before I knew his background). I made some sort of comment along the above lines, and a friend I was with pulled me up on it.
It is the reason I think why Fagin tropes and the like can be so devastating - they can be both produced and/or responded to without one or either party consciously making the Jewish connection as they do so. Obviously because of this, this is why it is so important for it to be called out at every opportunity.
In some ways I think it makes a justification for the complete banning of Oliver Twist from television (or a number of other “kids favourites” which include similar characters eg Chitty chitty bang bang - the child catcher).
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
Interesting, isn't it, how this piece ignores Jewish immigrants in favour of ones who, presumably, look a bit more properly coloured up.
Just another variety of anti-semitism going on here? The subtext of it buys into the notion that they're not as deserving of the (vomit-inducing) smug self congratulations because they must have money hoarded away somewhere. Let's parade our son of a Pakistani bus driver rather than those whose families are sitting on mountains of Rothschild gold. (Neatly ignoring the fact that in reality many of them had narrowly escaped the concentrations camps.)
It takes me back to that hideous old bat Anne Widdecombe and her clearly anti-semitic attack on Michael Howard. He apparently had 'something of the night' about him. Naked anti-semitism. He was portrayed on at least one front page as a Fagin figure. I'm just surprised they didn't go the whole hog and picture him drinking the blood of virgins before returning to his casket at dawn.
The fagin figure stuff was from Labour ads. No doubt it played well in the likes of Batley and Spen.
Re Javid - I think a good appointment
Agree about Javid.
And you're quite right about the Fagin and pig posters. Alastair Campbell was behind them.
I think Ann Widdecombe set the idea in motion though with her 'something of the night' remarks.
The thing about anti-semitism is that I think it is so ingrained in the human psyche that many people end up being anti-Semitic without even realising it. There is obviously often a bit of a link between “Jewish/Semitic features” and a perception of shiftiness/“something of the night” call it what you like. I realised this when I first saw a picture of Disraeli at the National Gallery when I was young (before I knew his background). I made some sort of comment along the above lines, and a friend I was with pulled me up on it.
It is the reason I think why Fagin tropes and the like can be so devastating - they can be both produced and/or responded to without one or either party consciously making the Jewish connection as they do so. Obviously because of this, this is why it is so important for it to be called out at every opportunity.
In some ways I think it makes a justification for the complete banning of Oliver Twist from television (or a number of other “kids favourites” which include similar characters eg Chitty chitty bang bang - the child catcher).
The 1948 Oliver Twist film was banned from the USA for that reason and only ever shown in heavily edited versions before the ban was lifted in 1970.
Meanwhile, in Egypt it was banned because it showed Jews in far too sympathetic a light.
From the PPE scandal, the crisis in our care service and the unbelievably poor test and trace system, he has utterly failed. It is time for the Health Secretary to go. https://twitter.com/LibDems/status/1409044072304721921
Sorry I gave you a chronic illness, I'm leaving you.
Ouch. What a revolting human being.
Not that that’s much of a surprise.
He’s going to be eaten alive in the divorce, isn’t he?
Could well force him to leave the Commons in search of financial sustenance elsewhere. Might be value in betting on a West Suffolk by election.
Should be an easy Tory hold if there is though.
I thought blame was irrelevant in divorce....
It will be the financial settlement for the care of 3 school age children and the mother looking after them which will cost.
You’re a lawyer, not me, but I thought if one party was unable to work as a result of the marriage that was also taken into account.
Which would certainly seem to be the case here given her illness.
Is that no longer the case?
I'm not a divorce lawyer. But my understanding is that where there are young children and the mother has given up work to look after them then that will be taken into account in the financial settlement. Even more so if she is ill and unable to work.
I hope she has some good friends and her own family rallying round her. And, also, that the press leave her alone. To be publicly - as well as privately - humiliated in this way must be awful.
From the PPE scandal, the crisis in our care service and the unbelievably poor test and trace system, he has utterly failed. It is time for the Health Secretary to go. https://twitter.com/LibDems/status/1409044072304721921
Hard to know when the next Tory leadership election will take place and in what circumstances it occurs.
But I was very unimpressed with Javid at the last contest. I expected him to shine and when it came to it he just didn’t.
Yeah, I think he’s overrated, too.
Still, he has to be in with a decent shot at the leadership given how well liked he is on the backbenches.
A bit empty in my view. But then he's an ex-Deutsche Bank banker so my view is a bit skewed. Such people featured quite regularly in my list of people needing investigation.
Still, he's probably politically in a strong position now. Odd that Boris didn't promote Zawahi or Argar. They'd have owed him. Javid doesn't.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
As alluded to on the other thread, that is what makes this seem so unsatisfactory, and also undermines any claim of whistleblowing. Matt Hancock was brought down by an on-camera snog. Not because he caused thousands of deaths in care homes, or wasted billions on a failed track and trace system, or possible corruption in no-bid contracts. Nor do we give him credit for the vaccination programme.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
Nah - he went becasue he broke his own rules - hypocrites can never stay. Never make rules for others you personally cannot obey
Hard to know when the next Tory leadership election will take place and in what circumstances it occurs.
But I was very unimpressed with Javid at the last contest. I expected him to shine and when it came to it he just didn’t.
Yeah, I think he’s overrated, too.
Still, he has to be in with a decent shot at the leadership given how well liked he is on the backbenches.
A bit empty in my view. But then he's an ex-Deutsche Bank banker so my view is a bit skewed. Such people featured quite regularly in my list of people needing investigation.
Still, he's probably politically in a strong position now. Odd that Boris didn't promote Zawahi or Argar. They'd have owed him. Javid doesn't.
Not sure that’s how Johnson’s mind works tbh. In fact i wouldn’t be surprised if one of his advisers actually suggested to him as a point in Javid’s favour. I don’t think he does much more detailed thinking beyond the end of next week. Which is typical of pathological liners/charlatans. Anything to get a good/avoid a ban headline now
Hard to know when the next Tory leadership election will take place and in what circumstances it occurs.
But I was very unimpressed with Javid at the last contest. I expected him to shine and when it came to it he just didn’t.
Yeah, I think he’s overrated, too.
Still, he has to be in with a decent shot at the leadership given how well liked he is on the backbenches.
A bit empty in my view. But then he's an ex-Deutsche Bank banker so my view is a bit skewed. Such people featured quite regularly in my list of people needing investigation.
Still, he's probably politically in a strong position now. Odd that Boris didn't promote Zawahi or Argar. They'd have owed him. Javid doesn't.
Promote those two and you create a further vacancy. That then needs filling. Which means more confusion.
Better to stick to one simple change given a couple of candidates were available.
Much the same logic that led Thatcher to make Pym foreign Secretary, despite hating his guts, when Carrington resigned.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
As alluded to on the other thread, that is what makes this seem so unsatisfactory, and also undermines any claim of whistleblowing. Matt Hancock was brought down by an on-camera snog. Not because he caused thousands of deaths in care homes, or wasted billions on a failed track and trace system, or possible corruption in no-bid contracts. Nor do we give him credit for the vaccination programme.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
Nah - he went becasue he broke his own rules - hypocrites can never stay. Never make rules for others you personally cannot obey
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
As alluded to on the other thread, that is what makes this seem so unsatisfactory, and also undermines any claim of whistleblowing. Matt Hancock was brought down by an on-camera snog. Not because he caused thousands of deaths in care homes, or wasted billions on a failed track and trace system, or possible corruption in no-bid contracts. Nor do we give him credit for the vaccination programme.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
For me, it's exactly right that this is what he goes for. For everything else, there is a counterfactual you could present where things would have been worse, or a heat of battle argument, or you can point to other countries who made the same error. Indeed, the argument about over-caution in release from lockdown could also go into the 'honest mistake' category. The sitting on the data which could have seen us released last week - well, he should have gone for that, for me - that falls into the 'dishonest mistake' category. But even here he could use the 'means to an end argument. Whereas the revelation that he wasn't even following his own rules - his own shitty, stupid, draconian, wildly disproportionate rules that have locked millions of people into this perpetual half life - without a doubt, that comes top of the charge sheet. He made having an affair illegal. He spent billions morally blackmailing the country into not seeing other people. And then he had an affair.
The problem with the wife who has known you since way before you were king of the world is that she sees through your facade.
She knows your fears and your insecurities. She knows that, deep down inside, you are not the Master of the Universe you purport to be. And some people don’t like to be reminded of that.
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
Interesting, isn't it, how this piece ignores Jewish immigrants in favour of ones who, presumably, look a bit more properly coloured up.
Just another variety of anti-semitism going on here? The subtext of it buys into the notion that they're not as deserving of the (vomit-inducing) smug self congratulations because they must have money hoarded away somewhere. Let's parade our son of a Pakistani bus driver rather than those whose families are sitting on mountains of Rothschild gold. (Neatly ignoring the fact that in reality many of them had narrowly escaped the concentrations camps.)
It takes me back to that hideous old bat Anne Widdecombe and her clearly anti-semitic attack on Michael Howard. He apparently had 'something of the night' about him. Naked anti-semitism. He was portrayed on at least one front page as a Fagin figure. I'm just surprised they didn't go the whole hog and picture him drinking the blood of virgins before returning to his casket at dawn.
Correction: the “newspaper front page” was a *Labour party campaign advertisement*
But they’re on the side of the goodies so it’s all ok…
Hard to know when the next Tory leadership election will take place and in what circumstances it occurs.
But I was very unimpressed with Javid at the last contest. I expected him to shine and when it came to it he just didn’t.
Yeah, I think he’s overrated, too.
Still, he has to be in with a decent shot at the leadership given how well liked he is on the backbenches.
A bit empty in my view. But then he's an ex-Deutsche Bank banker so my view is a bit skewed. Such people featured quite regularly in my list of people needing investigation.
Still, he's probably politically in a strong position now. Odd that Boris didn't promote Zawahi or Argar. They'd have owed him. Javid doesn't.
Promote those two and you create a further vacancy. That then needs filling. Which means more confusion.
Better to stick to one simple change given a couple of candidates were available.
Much the same logic that led Thatcher to make Pym foreign Secretary, despite hating his guts, when Carrington resigned.
Fair point.
But Thatcher appointed lots of people to senior posts whom she didn't much like and who didn't necessarily share her views.
Whereas Boris got rid of all his rivals and any MP who opposed him. He's been pretty ruthless. So I wonder whether he is now a little bit weakened.
I would say it’s as well the person contacted the Beeb and not the Russian Embassy, but I wonder why they didn’t contact the MoD or the police?
There is a tragicomic scene in the Cambridge Spies affair where Guy Burgess was passing top secret papers to his Russian handler in a pub, and dropped them all over the floor. An off-duty policeman drinking in the bar helped Burgess pick them up.
I would say it’s as well the person contacted the Beeb and not the Russian Embassy, but I wonder why they didn’t contact the MoD or the police?
There is a tragicomic scene in the Cambridge Spies affair where Guy Burgess was passing top secret papers to his Russian handler in a pub, and dropped them all over the floor. An off-duty policeman drinking in the bar helped Burgess pick them up.
I thought they always did it on a park bench muttering the weather is good in Moscow
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
As alluded to on the other thread, that is what makes this seem so unsatisfactory, and also undermines any claim of whistleblowing. Matt Hancock was brought down by an on-camera snog. Not because he caused thousands of deaths in care homes, or wasted billions on a failed track and trace system, or possible corruption in no-bid contracts. Nor do we give him credit for the vaccination programme.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
For me, it's exactly right that this is what he goes for. For everything else, there is a counterfactual you could present where things would have been worse, or a heat of battle argument, or you can point to other countries who made the same error. Indeed, the argument about over-caution in release from lockdown could also go into the 'honest mistake' category. The sitting on the data which could have seen us released last week - well, he should have gone for that, for me - that falls into the 'dishonest mistake' category. But even here he could use the 'means to an end argument. Whereas the revelation that he wasn't even following his own rules - his own shitty, stupid, draconian, wildly disproportionate rules that have locked millions of people into this perpetual half life - without a doubt, that comes top of the charge sheet. He made having an affair illegal. He spent billions morally blackmailing the country into not seeing other people. And then he had an affair.
The problem is, he’s been breaking his own rules in other fields too, with far more damaging public and public health consequences.
Procurement - we’ve been through that.
Care homes - the law states that care home residents should only be discharged from hospital when the manager of the care home has signed to say they accept them back. Instead, there have been cases in Birmingham where Covid positive care home residents were brought back by ambulance at 2am and threats were made to force the duty staff to take them in. This was to ensure a manager couldn’t refuse to take them back. No wonder Covid went ripping through our care homes.
Schools - the rules state that close contacts should isolate. The guidelines state that this is anyone within a ‘bubble.’ The law has actually been reinterpreted so as far as possible it is only anyone within 2 metres of a positive case. Not including any staff. No wonder Covid went rampaging through our schools.
Hancock genuinely seems to think that the law is what he says it is and if it disagrees with him, it can go fuck itself. While this isn’t his most serious breach of it, it’s all of a piece with his general attitude.
And such an attitude makes him totally unfit to serve in public office.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
Putting morality aside - I don't understand, logistically, how working parents of three children have an affair. Where do they find the time? And indeed the energy?
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
An office affair was not the hanging offence, there was also:
1) the breach of SD rules 2) the appointment of GC as non-executive director 3) the use of private emails for government business. 4) the potential undeclared conflicts of interest when awarding NHS contracts.
Hard to know when the next Tory leadership election will take place and in what circumstances it occurs.
But I was very unimpressed with Javid at the last contest. I expected him to shine and when it came to it he just didn’t.
Yeah, I think he’s overrated, too.
Still, he has to be in with a decent shot at the leadership given how well liked he is on the backbenches.
A bit empty in my view. But then he's an ex-Deutsche Bank banker so my view is a bit skewed. Such people featured quite regularly in my list of people needing investigation.
Still, he's probably politically in a strong position now. Odd that Boris didn't promote Zawahi or Argar. They'd have owed him. Javid doesn't.
Promote those two and you create a further vacancy. That then needs filling. Which means more confusion.
Better to stick to one simple change given a couple of candidates were available.
Much the same logic that led Thatcher to make Pym foreign Secretary, despite hating his guts, when Carrington resigned.
Fair point.
But Thatcher appointed lots of people to senior posts whom she didn't much like and who didn't necessarily share her views.
Whereas Boris got rid of all his rivals and any MP who opposed him. He's been pretty ruthless. So I wonder whether he is now a little bit weakened.
Thatcher got rid of Pym as soon as she could. The day after the 1983 General Election, in fact.
His ‘landslides don’t make successful governments’ remark is usually blamed, but in fact two days after his appointment he said to a group of friends ‘that woman’s a corporal, not a cavalry officer.’
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
Putting morality aside - I don't understand, logistically, how working parents of three children have an affair. Where do they find the time? And indeed the energy?
One is reminded of Denis Thatcher breaking up political meetings dragging on into the early hours by telling Margaret it was time for bed. Possibly Clementine Churchill too.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
Putting morality aside - I don't understand, logistically, how working parents of three children have an affair. Where do they find the time? And indeed the energy?
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
As alluded to on the other thread, that is what makes this seem so unsatisfactory, and also undermines any claim of whistleblowing. Matt Hancock was brought down by an on-camera snog. Not because he caused thousands of deaths in care homes, or wasted billions on a failed track and trace system, or possible corruption in no-bid contracts. Nor do we give him credit for the vaccination programme.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
For me, it's exactly right that this is what he goes for. For everything else, there is a counterfactual you could present where things would have been worse, or a heat of battle argument, or you can point to other countries who made the same error. Indeed, the argument about over-caution in release from lockdown could also go into the 'honest mistake' category. The sitting on the data which could have seen us released last week - well, he should have gone for that, for me - that falls into the 'dishonest mistake' category. But even here he could use the 'means to an end argument. Whereas the revelation that he wasn't even following his own rules - his own shitty, stupid, draconian, wildly disproportionate rules that have locked millions of people into this perpetual half life - without a doubt, that comes top of the charge sheet. He made having an affair illegal. He spent billions morally blackmailing the country into not seeing other people. And then he had an affair.
The problem is, he’s been breaking his own rules in other fields too, with far more damaging public and public health consequences.
Procurement - we’ve been through that.
Care homes - the law states that care home residents should only be discharged from hospital when the manager of the care home has signed to say they accept them back. Instead, there have been cases in Birmingham where Covid positive care home residents were brought back by ambulance at 2am and threats were made to force the duty staff to take them in. This was to ensure a manager couldn’t refuse to take them back. No wonder Covid went ripping through our care homes.
Schools - the rules state that close contacts should isolate. The guidelines state that this is anyone within a ‘bubble.’ The law has actually been reinterpreted so as far as possible it is only anyone within 2 metres of a positive case. Not including any staff. No wonder Covid went rampaging through our schools.
Hancock genuinely seems to think that the law is what he says it is and if it disagrees with him, it can go fuck itself. While this isn’t his most serious breach of it, it’s all of a piece with his general attitude.
And such an attitude makes him totally unfit to serve in public office.
Govt ministers can’t hide on this things because they made them laws. If they were guidance (depending on the nature of the offence, and to the extent it was “one-off”/“moment of weakness” etc) then there is the possibility of brazening it out. But the Government have actively criminalised a large part of normal human activity. For the U.K. population since March 2020 there has been no “private life” which didn’t (at least in theory) put you on the hook for criminal sanction.
One is reminded of Denis Thatcher breaking up political meetings dragging on into the early hours by telling Margaret it was time for bed. Possibly Clementine Churchill too.
I would say it’s as well the person contacted the Beeb and not the Russian Embassy, but I wonder why they didn’t contact the MoD or the police?
There is a tragicomic scene in the Cambridge Spies affair where Guy Burgess was passing top secret papers to his Russian handler in a pub, and dropped them all over the floor. An off-duty policeman drinking in the bar helped Burgess pick them up.
I thought they always did it on a park bench muttering the weather is good in Moscow
One of the books or documentaries on the Cambridge Spies discusses that dilemma. Whether to make contact in out of the way, isolated places, where you can't be seen but if you are, you might be noticed, or if it is safer to meet in crowded places where no-one gives you a second glance.
Hard to know when the next Tory leadership election will take place and in what circumstances it occurs.
But I was very unimpressed with Javid at the last contest. I expected him to shine and when it came to it he just didn’t.
Yeah, I think he’s overrated, too.
Still, he has to be in with a decent shot at the leadership given how well liked he is on the backbenches.
A bit empty in my view. But then he's an ex-Deutsche Bank banker so my view is a bit skewed. Such people featured quite regularly in my list of people needing investigation.
Still, he's probably politically in a strong position now. Odd that Boris didn't promote Zawahi or Argar. They'd have owed him. Javid doesn't.
Promote those two and you create a further vacancy. That then needs filling. Which means more confusion.
Better to stick to one simple change given a couple of candidates were available.
Much the same logic that led Thatcher to make Pym foreign Secretary, despite hating his guts, when Carrington resigned.
Fair point.
But Thatcher appointed lots of people to senior posts whom she didn't much like and who didn't necessarily share her views.
Whereas Boris got rid of all his rivals and any MP who opposed him. He's been pretty ruthless. So I wonder whether he is now a little bit weakened.
Thatcher got rid of Pym as soon as she could. The day after the 1983 General Election, in fact.
His ‘landslides don’t make successful governments’ remark is usually blamed, but in fact two days after his appointment he said to a group of friends ‘that woman’s a corporal, not a cavalry officer.’
And she got to hear about it...
Sounds like good riddance to bad rubbish, tbh. Thatcher took on the snobs. And won.
Amazing how many PBers are willing to judge Hancock over the affair itself, and not for being a sweaty mountebank.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
Putting morality aside - I don't understand, logistically, how working parents of three children have an affair. Where do they find the time? And indeed the energy?
Yes but the job requires v long hours, travelling etc etc. So lots of slots in the diary to canoodle.
One presumes it is *easier* to find time as a politician to have an affair.
Hard to know when the next Tory leadership election will take place and in what circumstances it occurs.
But I was very unimpressed with Javid at the last contest. I expected him to shine and when it came to it he just didn’t.
Yeah, I think he’s overrated, too.
Still, he has to be in with a decent shot at the leadership given how well liked he is on the backbenches.
A bit empty in my view. But then he's an ex-Deutsche Bank banker so my view is a bit skewed. Such people featured quite regularly in my list of people needing investigation.
Still, he's probably politically in a strong position now. Odd that Boris didn't promote Zawahi or Argar. They'd have owed him. Javid doesn't.
Promote those two and you create a further vacancy. That then needs filling. Which means more confusion.
Better to stick to one simple change given a couple of candidates were available.
Much the same logic that led Thatcher to make Pym foreign Secretary, despite hating his guts, when Carrington resigned.
Fair point.
But Thatcher appointed lots of people to senior posts whom she didn't much like and who didn't necessarily share her views.
Whereas Boris got rid of all his rivals and any MP who opposed him. He's been pretty ruthless. So I wonder whether he is now a little bit weakened.
He has been keeping quiet this weekend. If the rumours of him and Carrie being in Madeira for a short honeymoon are true, I wonder how that will go down.
One is reminded of Denis Thatcher breaking up political meetings dragging on into the early hours by telling Margaret it was time for bed. Possibly Clementine Churchill too.
Or the Tory Violet Attlee giving Scotland Yard protection officers the willies when driving her husband around at speed during election campaigns.
Comments
So apparently all his successor need to is follow the policies, planning and trail already blazed under Hancock's watch. Heck, even yours truly could do that!
May the spirit and wisdom of Lord Woolton guide Sajid Javid as head of DHSC.
I say this sincerely. because somehow I doubt that the problems of social care are unlikely to be solved definitively and permanently under the premiership of Boris Johnson. Even IF he was Winston Churchill and Clement Attlee combined.
EDIT - First in bore, first in place, last in the hearts of his fellow PBers . . .
We are on a spending splurge. Andrew Neil has brilliantly commented that the Government's credit card may have to be taken away.
It's not just a splurge. It's a chaotic one. There's no consistency or strategy to the levelling up process and vanity projects - that thing beloved of Johnson - are to the fore. Remember that this is the guy who wanted to build a brand new London airport in the Thames estuary. He loves to spend, spend, spend.
It's disastrous for Britain finances.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/06/26/rishi-sunak-must-confiscate-governments-credit-card-say-tory/
What a surprise.
I'm not sure left-right comes into it, except to note that this is (in some ways) the most leftwing Government of my lifetime. Nationalisation, statism, high spending, plans to build all over the southern green belt, vanity projects, higher business taxes and a raid on people's pensions.
By 2025, we will have three million more higher rate taxpayers than in 2010. Corporation tax is heading to its highest level since 1989. The tax burden is rising to its highest since the Sixties. Our debt is at its highest since the early Sixties. And, according to last week's ONS figures, borrowing in the year to March (as a percentage of GDP) has reached a level last seen in the Second World War.
And The Guardian, Sun and Evening Standard have all written about these problems in recent days and probably others too.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2021/jun/21/social-care-royal-yacht-battle-looms-uk-spending-priorities
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/five-years-brexit-vote-better-off-b942161.html
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15363925/rishi-sunak-britains-debt-2-2trillion/
Meanwhile I see that the Handycock camera footage was regular office CCTV with the footage having been obtained by a disgruntled employee of the department who saw him or herself as a whistleblower.
F1: bit groggy but Tsunoda, at the moment, doesn't appear to have a penalty for impeding Bottas. Mildly surprised. Will peruse the markets for things worth backing.
Been thinking of trying to alter my strategy sometimes, and go for more tips with lower stakes. May or may not do that today.
The Tory Party has already had two leaders from an ethnic minority - in 1868 and 2003.
The Liberals and Labour have one each - 1931 and 2010.
I think you mean the first *non-white* leader which is not quite the same thing.
If.
https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/decision-document/2021 Styrian Grand Prix - Offence - Car 22 - impeding car 77.pdf
Mr. JohnL, be very brave to rule one of them out.
If they collided and took one another out on lap 1 I'd probably put Bottas favourite.
Incidentally, Ladbrokes doesn't have each way for the winner, which is a shade disappointing. I suppose it's a reaction to last year's Hamilton dominance becoming a top 2 dominance.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/15402370/tour-de-france-chaos-as-massive-crash-caused-by-a-fan-wipes-out-half-of-the-peloton/?rec_article=true
Just another variety of anti-semitism going on here? The subtext of it buys into the notion that they're not as deserving of the (vomit-inducing) smug self congratulations because they must have money hoarded away somewhere. Let's parade our son of a Pakistani bus driver rather than those whose families are sitting on mountains of Rothschild gold. (Neatly ignoring the fact that in reality many of them had narrowly escaped the concentrations camps.)
It takes me back to that hideous old bat Anne Widdecombe and her clearly anti-semitic attack on Michael Howard. He apparently had 'something of the night' about him. Naked anti-semitism. He was portrayed on at least one front page as a Fagin figure. I'm just surprised they didn't go the whole hog and picture him drinking the blood of virgins before returning to his casket at dawn.
The man is a grade A shit
https://twitter.com/callumjodwyer/status/1408915831996747786?s=19
Sorry I gave you a chronic illness, I'm leaving you.
Betting Post
F1: You'll never guess how many tips I offer for this race!
Unless you guess five, of course.
https://enormo-haddock.blogspot.com/2021/06/styria-pre-race-2021.html
Edited extra bit:
Gasly to win group 1 (Leclerc, Ricciardo, Alonso) at 2.3
Vettel to win group 2 (Sainz, Stroll, Tsunoda) at 4.5
Winner without the big 4, Norris at 1.53
Over 17.5 classified finishers, 2.5
Russell points, 2.25
Re Javid - I think a good appointment and a fair and well-balanced header - is someone impersonating TSE today?
The real problem with this piece is that it mentions the issue at all. It's a can of worms which TSE doesn't appear sufficiently sensitive to tackle.
And frankly I really hope we don't go the direction of the US on race. Once the card is played it's very difficult to un-play it.
That’s the problem with being a shit. You get blamed for anything and everything, however unfairly. Pile on!
And you're quite right about the Fagin and pig posters. Alastair Campbell was behind them.
I think Ann Widdecombe set the idea in motion though with her 'something of the night' remarks.
The sign said, in a mixture of French and German, Go Granny & Grandad (Allez Opi Omi). At least the fan can be pretty sure her grandparents will have seen her greeting, so job done!
Compare with the USA and its unending line of WASPs (bar Kennedy) until Obama.
Boris Johnson doesn't appear to have any idea what he signed up to when he entered his Faustian pact making him Prime Minister and Dominic Cummings the most powerful man in the land.
They call him Rasputin but that doesn't do him justice. To sell Brexit to 52% of a population against the forces of government parliament academia business and the media makes him a genius that not even the greatest minds could match.
This is not a person any sane man would cross. This is Anton Chigurth in No Country for Old Men. A man who gets his man.
Good luck Boris.
I’m doing so he ends the story.
Not that that’s much of a surprise.
He’s going to be eaten alive in the divorce, isn’t he?
Could well force him to leave the Commons in search of financial sustenance elsewhere. Might be value in betting on a West Suffolk by election.
Should be an easy Tory hold if there is though.
1 in 5 Brits have had an affair, there must be one or two on PB.
I do think the stress of the last year must have been immense and it is absolutely textbook that this can manifest in affairs.
This assumes the affair started recently, though.
Oh those pre-woke days when he would rhapsodise about pubescent Thai courtesans.
One feature about the appointment of Javid is that there's now someone in the Cabinet who doesn't owe Dominic Cummings anything. At all.
Ed. Does though give SJ the opportunity for revenge.
It is worse than nailing Al Capone for not paying income tax. Lots of people have affairs at work, often shortlived. Many employers have rules about it. Many families break up. These things are commonplace.
Boris's instinct was that Matt's dalliance with Gina did not matter. He was wrong about that, but probably right that it *should* not have mattered.
The list of papabiles is actually quite long now.
Rishi
Patel
Truss
Hunt
Javid
Gove
Raab
I don’t think the latter two have a chance, but both probably still harbour ambitions.
Who knows what the state of the marriage was? Today it's in ashes. But we can all feel a yuck factor in the treatment of young children. There are not just his three but hers as well. All young and all finding their lives turned upside down.
That is very sad. You can stop being a husband or wife. You cannot stop being a parent.
The findings of a Panelbase poll carried out for The Sunday Times indicates that, excluding “don’t knows”, 48 per cent would back independence, down four points since April when support for breaking up the Union stood at 52 per cent. Support for the Union in today’s poll is 52 per cent, up four points.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/support-for-secession-falls-since-may-election-pd2vjtqbg
Canny Scottish electorate - keep Westminster on their toes by returning SNP administrations, keep Holyrood on its toes by prevaricating over independence. They have both where they want them.
Although that said, on every level this is much less serious than the care homes Covid disaster, or indeed the DfE/DoH guidance to schools.
But I was very unimpressed with Javid at the last contest. I expected him to shine and when it came to it he just didn’t.
It is the reason I think why Fagin tropes and the like can be so devastating - they can be both produced and/or responded to without one or either party consciously making the Jewish connection as they do so. Obviously because of this, this is why it is so important for it to be called out at every opportunity.
In some ways I think it makes a justification for the complete banning of Oliver Twist from television (or a number of other “kids favourites” which include similar characters eg Chitty chitty bang bang - the child catcher).
Still, he has to be in with a decent shot at the leadership given how well liked he is on the backbenches.
Which would certainly seem to be the case here given her illness.
Is that no longer the case?
Meanwhile, in Egypt it was banned because it showed Jews in far too sympathetic a light.
Truss is like the nation's permanently angry first wife.
Hunt is too remainy for the tories and looks like the result of a human/rat gene splicing experiment in a Wuhan lab.
Looks like Javid vs Gove vs Raab.
But you forget 𝕋ℍ𝔼 𝕆𝕌𝕋𝕊𝕀𝔻𝔼ℝ.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57624942
Liberal Democrats @LibDems 3m
From the PPE scandal, the crisis in our care service and the unbelievably poor test and trace system, he has utterly failed. It is time for the Health Secretary to go.
https://twitter.com/LibDems/status/1409044072304721921
I hope she has some good friends and her own family rallying round her. And, also, that the press leave her alone. To be publicly - as well as privately - humiliated in this way must be awful.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9728749/SARAH-VINE-problem-wife-knows-youre-not-Master-Universe.html?ico=amp-comments-viewall#article-9728749
I would say it’s as well the person contacted the Beeb and not the Russian Embassy, but I wonder why they didn’t contact the MoD or the police?
Still, he's probably politically in a strong position now. Odd that Boris didn't promote Zawahi or Argar. They'd have owed him. Javid doesn't.
Better to stick to one simple change given a couple of candidates were available.
Much the same logic that led Thatcher to make Pym foreign Secretary, despite hating his guts, when Carrington resigned.
For everything else, there is a counterfactual you could present where things would have been worse, or a heat of battle argument, or you can point to other countries who made the same error. Indeed, the argument about over-caution in release from lockdown could also go into the 'honest mistake' category.
The sitting on the data which could have seen us released last week - well, he should have gone for that, for me - that falls into the 'dishonest mistake' category. But even here he could use the 'means to an end argument.
Whereas the revelation that he wasn't even following his own rules - his own shitty, stupid, draconian, wildly disproportionate rules that have locked millions of people into this perpetual half life - without a doubt, that comes top of the charge sheet.
He made having an affair illegal. He spent billions morally blackmailing the country into not seeing other people. And then he had an affair.
Labour doesnt do women leaders or ethnic for that matter
The Cons. will elect a trans non-human cyborg first while Labour is still choosing between the friends of Len Mcclusky
The problem with the wife who has known you since way before you were king of the world is that she sees through your facade.
She knows your fears and your insecurities. She knows that, deep down inside, you are not the Master of the Universe you purport to be. And some people don’t like to be reminded of that.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9728749/SARAH-VINE-problem-wife-knows-youre-not-Master-Universe.html
But they’re on the side of the goodies so it’s all ok…
But Thatcher appointed lots of people to senior posts whom she didn't much like and who didn't necessarily share her views.
Whereas Boris got rid of all his rivals and any MP who opposed him. He's been pretty ruthless. So I wonder whether he is now a little bit weakened.
Lord Bethell, Test & Trace minister, shielded Hancock from scrutiny for months
Big Qs for Hancock's friend/donor
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lord-bethell-faces-inquiry-over-sponsorship-of-parliamentary-pass-for-matt-hancocks-lover-wp5qmf359
We first asked @JimBethell, a minister, why he sponsored Coladangelo's parliamentary pass ... last November.
The govt answered most of our questions but simply ignored this one.
The rules say peers can only sponsor passes for staffers who "genuinely & personally work for them' https://twitter.com/Gabriel_Pogrund/status/1409034430904258562
Procurement - we’ve been through that.
Care homes - the law states that care home residents should only be discharged from hospital when the manager of the care home has signed to say they accept them back. Instead, there have been cases in Birmingham where Covid positive care home residents were brought back by ambulance at 2am and threats were made to force the duty staff to take them in. This was to ensure a manager couldn’t refuse to take them back. No wonder Covid went ripping through our care homes.
Schools - the rules state that close contacts should isolate. The guidelines state that this is anyone within a ‘bubble.’ The law has actually been reinterpreted so as far as possible it is only anyone within 2 metres of a positive case. Not including any staff. No wonder Covid went rampaging through our schools.
Hancock genuinely seems to think that the law is what he says it is and if it disagrees with him, it can go fuck itself. While this isn’t his most serious breach of it, it’s all of a piece with his general attitude.
And such an attitude makes him totally unfit to serve in public office.
1) the breach of SD rules
2) the appointment of GC as non-executive director
3) the use of private emails for government business.
4) the potential undeclared conflicts of interest when awarding NHS contracts.
His ‘landslides don’t make successful governments’ remark is usually blamed, but in fact two days after his appointment he said to a group of friends ‘that woman’s a corporal, not a cavalry officer.’
And she got to hear about it...
This clearly makes a massive difference.
Thatcher took on the snobs. And won.
One presumes it is *easier* to find time as a politician to have an affair.
But he comes across as a bit thick.
How about contacting the MoD?
Another Tory scandal!