You can get 1/4 or even a tad longer on all states ending as expected (Biden wins PA/GA/NV but loses NC, AZ doesn't actually matter either way). The 48.5 EC Handicap market. Quite remarkable. In a normal cycle it would be 1.03.
The train of delusion, picking up speed for about four and a half years now, is about to finally crash into the buffers, and if mitigating steps aren't taken the results won't be pretty.
PB bows to your greater personal knowledge on the subject ....
I will refer you to opening of this thread header I wrote last year.
‘Never trust anybody who spells gonorrhoea correctly on the first attempt’ is a maxim that has served me well in life, I might revise that maxim to ‘Never trust anybody who says a no deal Brexit will be fine.’ I suspect many MPs are also guided by the latter maxim.
PB bows to your greater personal knowledge on the subject ....
I will refer you to opening of this thread header I wrote last year.
‘Never trust anybody who spells gonorrhoea correctly on the first attempt’ is a maxim that has served me well in life, I might revise that maxim to ‘Never trust anybody who says a no deal Brexit will be fine.’ I suspect many MPs are also guided by the latter maxim.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
The train of delusion, picking up speed for about four and a half years now, is about to finally crash into the buffers, and if mitigating steps aren't taken the results won't be pretty.
I have money and I have popcorn - sadly the one thing I can't do is watch it from a distance..
Has @HYUFD taken over and placed OGH in chains in Bedford Prison with @rcs1000 in permanent exile across the pond ??
I would be happy to serve as Grand Vizier to any regime, with all the trustworthiness that implies.
Unless you have experience in the higher echelons of the GOP in Mississippi on your CV, then I regret to say you are disqualified .... forgeries are however entirely valid.
A 9% chance that people have misinterpreted Betfair's actual Terms and Conditions for the bet - sounds about right.
I specifically asked Betfair about a coup on twitter. They don't have a clue. You'd have thought with half a billion quid in the balance someone might y'know be able to know what their rules actually are ?
PB bows to your greater personal knowledge on the subject ....
I will refer you to opening of this thread header I wrote last year.
‘Never trust anybody who spells gonorrhoea correctly on the first attempt’ is a maxim that has served me well in life, I might revise that maxim to ‘Never trust anybody who says a no deal Brexit will be fine.’ I suspect many MPs are also guided by the latter maxim.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
Settling a £600m market? Its not the 1230 at Wincanton.
Has @HYUFD taken over and placed OGH in chains in Bedford Prison with @rcs1000 in permanent exile across the pond ??
I would be happy to serve as Grand Vizier to any regime, with all the trustworthiness that implies.
Unless you have experience in the higher echelons of the GOP in Mississippi on your CV, then I regret to say you are disqualified .... forgeries are however entirely valid.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
Settling a £600m market? Its not the 1230 at Wincanton.
Plus I'm sure they're happy to keep getting commission from the matched bets of all those fools throwing money away.
You can get 1/4 or even a tad longer on all states ending as expected (Biden wins PA/GA/NV but loses NC, AZ doesn't actually matter either way). The 48.5 EC Handicap market. Quite remarkable. In a normal cycle it would be 1.03.
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
Settling a £600m market? Its not the 1230 at Wincanton.
Plus I'm sure they're happy to keep getting commission from the matched bets of all those fools throwing money away.
Quite. That actually gives them an incentive to craft ambiguous rules or rules that don't fully match the title of the market.
On InfoWars, Steve Pieczenik, a former state department assistant secretary, and Tom Clancy co-writer turned QAnon truther, explained how the ‘voter fraud’ had been permitted by an all-seeing Trump because it was in fact an elaborate sting operation against his enemies: “We watermarked every ballot paper with blockchain technology…. We know very well where every one went. All of this was expected.” Or, to quote Q’s unofficial slogan: Trust The Plan.
PB bows to your greater personal knowledge on the subject ....
I will refer you to opening of this thread header I wrote last year.
‘Never trust anybody who spells gonorrhoea correctly on the first attempt’ is a maxim that has served me well in life, I might revise that maxim to ‘Never trust anybody who says a no deal Brexit will be fine.’ I suspect many MPs are also guided by the latter maxim.
The train of delusion, picking up speed for about four and a half years now, is about to finally crash into the buffers, and if mitigating steps aren't taken the results won't be pretty.
We don't need a trade deal now Boris has discovered a vaccine!
Although I did wonder what might happen, if our inbound 30,000,000 dose consignment from Pfizer Germany, gets held up for several months on the M2 lorry park, while HMRC check the manifests.
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
A close aide of Ronald Reagan once remarked 'I have never seen a man so pussywhipped by his wife in all my life', this clip also illustrates the point about Nancy's control over Reagan (and I think Jill Biden will similarly be a powerful force in the new White House over Joe)
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
We don't need a trade deal now Boris has discovered a vaccine!
Although I did wonder what might happen, if our inbound 30,000,000 dose consignment from Pfizer Germany, gets held up for several months on the M2 lorry park, while HMRC check the manifests.
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
I'm not sure what relevance that has to the UK. And existence of precedent is not evidence that such a thing should be a non-story.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
At some point they will need to settle BIDEN WINNER but having failed to do it when they should have done - on the call of PA when he passed 270 and the networks decreed him President Elect - they now have no distinct and specific "event" to hang the closure on. Also there are big commissionable sums being traded and so they have little incentive to bring the hammer down until they really have to. It's an interesting situation.
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
I'm not sure what relevance that has to the UK. And existence of precedent is not evidence that such a thing should be a non-story.
Man consults wife/fiancée for advice is a total non-story.
Do you never discuss anything with your significant other?
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
At some point they will need to settle BIDEN WINNER but having failed to do it when they should have done - on the call of PA when he passed 270 and the networks decreed him President Elect - they now have no distinct and specific "event" to hang the closure on. Also there are big commissionable sums being traded and so they have little incentive to bring the hammer down until they really have to. It's an interesting situation.
Surely the Electoral College vote now is the event?
Or if it goes before Supreme Court and they dismiss it that would be an earlier event?
I'm idly wondering what a good case of the clap looks like.
No pics please.
The worst I have seen was the dose a shipmate got in Bahrain. He had rubbered up but this Uzbek sort's batter was so toxic it rotted the skin of his shaft were the protection of the coxglove ended. Amazing and exactly the type of thing I joined up to see.
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
I'm not sure what relevance that has to the UK. And existence of precedent is not evidence that such a thing should be a non-story.
Man consults wife/fiancée for advice is a total non-story.
Do you never discuss anything with your significant other?
Do you need to repeat my earlier post?
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
I'm idly wondering what a good case of the clap looks like.
No pics please.
The worst I have seen was the dose a shipmate got in Bahrain. He had rubbered up but this Uzbek sort's batter was so toxic it rotted the skin of his shaft were the protection of the coxglove ended. Amazing and exactly the type of thing I joined up to see.
Oh dear god. Though I blame theuniondivvie for opening the door here.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
At some point they will need to settle BIDEN WINNER but having failed to do it when they should have done - on the call of PA when he passed 270 and the networks decreed him President Elect - they now have no distinct and specific "event" to hang the closure on. Also there are big commissionable sums being traded and so they have little incentive to bring the hammer down until they really have to. It's an interesting situation.
Surely the Electoral College vote now is the event?
Or if it goes before Supreme Court and they dismiss it that would be an earlier event?
Could be. But we don't know and neither do Betfair. Or if they do they're not saying.
If the EU wants a deal they can compromise and agree to our terms or meet us in the middle.
Why? We don't hold the advantage here no matter what you may wish..
Of course we do. 🤷🏻♂️
Do the thousands of businesses and millions of jobs that depend on the outcome of these negotiations get an opinion on this?
No, businesses and jobs don't vote.
Employees and employers do. They got a say on in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2019. Had any one of those 4 gone differently we wouldn't have left the EU. Enough is enough now.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
At some point they will need to settle BIDEN WINNER but having failed to do it when they should have done - on the call of PA when he passed 270 and the networks decreed him President Elect - they now have no distinct and specific "event" to hang the closure on. Also there are big commissionable sums being traded and so they have little incentive to bring the hammer down until they really have to. It's an interesting situation.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
Settling a £600m market? Its not the 1230 at Wincanton.
Funny you should mention that, as my horse actually won the 1230 at Wincanton very easily counting only legal horses.
I know Corals, Ladbrokes, Paddy Power and the reast of the lamestream betting industry say my horse fell at the first fence and had to be shot. But they don't decide horse races - the courts do.
I'll be holding a major press conference at Radisson Blu Pest Control at 3pm to present some startling allegations about what really went down (actual evidence to follow at an unspecified point) - be there.
I'm idly wondering what a good case of the clap looks like.
No pics please.
The worst I have seen was the dose a shipmate got in Bahrain. He had rubbered up but this Uzbek sort's batter was so toxic it rotted the skin of his shaft were the protection of the coxglove ended. Amazing and exactly the type of thing I joined up to see.
I'm idly wondering what a good case of the clap looks like.
No pics please.
The worst I have seen was the dose a shipmate got in Bahrain. He had rubbered up but this Uzbek sort's batter was so toxic it rotted the skin of his shaft were the protection of the coxglove ended. Amazing and exactly the type of thing I joined up to see.
Oh dear god. Though I blame theuniondivvie for opening the door here.
Forgot to ask you @Barnesian - hopefully you held your nerve and made a profit on the Biden win?
(Feel a personal interest since you once said you'd "followed" me into doing it.)
No. I lost my nerve around 2:30am on the night and (after a bottle of red) and traded out for a loss of about £40. Boo.
I have a bet with Ladbrokes at 6/1 to Trump will win four out of the following: Texas, Ohio, Georgia, Florida, Arizona and N Carolina. And a similar bet at 6/1 that he'll win five of them. That should put me ahead.
I'd have been much better off if I'd gone to bed at 10pm and got up at 8am.
I'm idly wondering what a good case of the clap looks like.
No pics please.
The worst I have seen was the dose a shipmate got in Bahrain. He had rubbered up but this Uzbek sort's batter was so toxic it rotted the skin of his shaft were the protection of the coxglove ended. Amazing and exactly the type of thing I joined up to see.
Oh dear god. Though I blame theuniondivvie for opening the door here.
I'm idly wondering what a good case of the clap looks like.
No pics please.
The worst I have seen was the dose a shipmate got in Bahrain. He had rubbered up but this Uzbek sort's batter was so toxic it rotted the skin of his shaft were the protection of the coxglove ended. Amazing and exactly the type of thing I joined up to see.
Bet it wasn't all glamour though.
PB only gets the 3 and 4 star anecdotes due to the delicate middle class civvie sensibilities. 5 star material remains haram.
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
I'm not sure what relevance that has to the UK. And existence of precedent is not evidence that such a thing should be a non-story.
Man consults wife/fiancée for advice is a total non-story.
Do you never discuss anything with your significant other?
Do you need to repeat my earlier post?
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
What you said earlier is nonsense.
Of course Carrie has no Government role, but her views are not of no consequence. As the fiancée of the Prime Minister of course her views are of consequence just as every Prime Minister's partner is always of "consequence".
So your assumption is wrong. The rest of your post is wrong.
Forgot to ask you @Barnesian - hopefully you held your nerve and made a profit on the Biden win?
(Feel a personal interest since you once said you'd "followed" me into doing it.)
No. I lost my nerve around 2:30am on the night and (after a bottle of red) and traded out for a loss of about £40. Boo.
Not to appear too annoying but 2.30 am is when I swooped on Biden's ECVs at 262. I still think he's going to hole out at 306. Which would be tidy.
p.s. despite praising certain champagnes, like Mike I gave up alcohol. In my case I haven't touched it since February 2019. I don't think drink or sleep are conducive to spread betting. Mind you, nor are everlasting suspended markets which is what happened to Spreadex.
Forgot to ask you @Barnesian - hopefully you held your nerve and made a profit on the Biden win?
(Feel a personal interest since you once said you'd "followed" me into doing it.)
No. I lost my nerve around 2:30am on the night and (after a bottle of red) and traded out for a loss of about £40. Boo.
I have a bet with Ladbrokes at 6/1 to Trump will win four out of the following: Texas, Ohio, Georgia, Florida, Arizona and N Carolina. And a similar bet at 6/1 that he'll win five of them. That should put me ahead.
I'd have been much better off if I'd gone to bed at 10pm and got up at 8am.
I'm idly wondering what a good case of the clap looks like.
No pics please.
The worst I have seen was the dose a shipmate got in Bahrain. He had rubbered up but this Uzbek sort's batter was so toxic it rotted the skin of his shaft were the protection of the coxglove ended. Amazing and exactly the type of thing I joined up to see.
Bet it wasn't all glamour though.
PB only gets the 3 and 4 star anecdotes due to the delicate middle class civvie sensibilities. 5 star material remains haram.
That's what being working class or upper class entails? I'm glad to be out of it!
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
I'm not sure what relevance that has to the UK. And existence of precedent is not evidence that such a thing should be a non-story.
Man consults wife/fiancée for advice is a total non-story.
Do you never discuss anything with your significant other?
Do you need to repeat my earlier post?
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
What you said earlier is nonsense.
Of course Carrie has no Government role, but her views are not of no consequence. As the fiancée of the Prime Minister of course her views are of consequence just as every Prime Minister's partner is always of "consequence".
So your assumption is wrong. The rest of your post is wrong.
The question is: who leaked this to Kuenssburg? Assuming it wasn't Boris or Carrie, who in government knows, or was told, that Carrie effectively has a veto on government appointments?
Forgot to ask you @Barnesian - hopefully you held your nerve and made a profit on the Biden win?
(Feel a personal interest since you once said you'd "followed" me into doing it.)
No. I lost my nerve around 2:30am on the night and (after a bottle of red) and traded out for a loss of about £40. Boo.
I have a bet with Ladbrokes at 6/1 to Trump will win four out of the following: Texas, Ohio, Georgia, Florida, Arizona and N Carolina. And a similar bet at 6/1 that he'll win five of them. That should put me ahead.
I'd have been much better off if I'd gone to bed at 10pm and got up at 8am.
I plan to put a thread up where we can discuss our betting experience.
Forgot to ask you @Barnesian - hopefully you held your nerve and made a profit on the Biden win?
(Feel a personal interest since you once said you'd "followed" me into doing it.)
No. I lost my nerve around 2:30am on the night and (after a bottle of red) and traded out for a loss of about £40. Boo.
I have a bet with Ladbrokes at 6/1 to Trump will win four out of the following: Texas, Ohio, Georgia, Florida, Arizona and N Carolina. And a similar bet at 6/1 that he'll win five of them. That should put me ahead.
I'd have been much better off if I'd gone to bed at 10pm and got up at 8am.
So would we all.
No way.
One of my best ever bets was the one I made with my head against my gut at 2.30 am.
I have John King to thank and because I wasn't swayed by what was going on in Miami Dade. The clue to Biden's win lay in the suburbs, where he was getting at least a 5% swing from Hillary Clinton. That was robust enough to show me that selling Biden and buying Trump was panic by the markets based on 2016. If the Florida suburbs were swinging to Biden then the Midwest would too.
Which is also, by the way, why you should be very careful betting against the Democrats on Jan 5th in Georgia. The demographic of the state has changed a lot.
On InfoWars, Steve Pieczenik, a former state department assistant secretary, and Tom Clancy co-writer turned QAnon truther, explained how the ‘voter fraud’ had been permitted by an all-seeing Trump because it was in fact an elaborate sting operation against his enemies: “We watermarked every ballot paper with blockchain technology…. We know very well where every one went. All of this was expected.” Or, to quote Q’s unofficial slogan: Trust The Plan.
Do Betfair even look at their rules when deciding whether to settle a market, or do they just leave it to punters, i.e. keep it open as long as significant amounts are being matched?
At some point they will need to settle BIDEN WINNER but having failed to do it when they should have done - on the call of PA when he passed 270 and the networks decreed him President Elect - they now have no distinct and specific "event" to hang the closure on. Also there are big commissionable sums being traded and so they have little incentive to bring the hammer down until they really have to. It's an interesting situation.
Surely the Electoral College vote now is the event?
Or if it goes before Supreme Court and they dismiss it that would be an earlier event?
Could be. But we don't know and neither do Betfair. Or if they do they're not saying.
I really don't think you've identified a real problem here. The Electoral College is going to meet on 14 December with a number of electors pledged to Trump and another number to Biden.
Whether you think that the respective numbers will be as currently projected, or whether you're absolutely crackers and think it'll change, the one thing we can agree on is that that will happen. If the market can settle a little early because Trump concedes and/or exhausts legal routes, then no doubt it will.
If the US descends into anarchy or aliens invade such that the Electoral College can't meet then at some point Betfair will presumably void the market. I'd say it's pretty bloody unlikely though.
Professor Spector was refreshingly outspoken when I (not me, Freddie Sayers) interviewed him yesterday.
Had the Government followed data from the ZOE app they would not have gone into a second lockdown, which he believes was unnecessary
The Government is tilted too much in the direction of caution and has lost a balanced sense of proportion
He is worried that they will use the new vaccine news as a “carrot” to keep us locked down for the next three months, when he believes it will likely take most of the year to get enough people vaccinated
He understands people’s concerns about such a new vaccine, and ZOE will be tracking any side effects from vaccinated people via its app
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
Actually to be fair to Carrie, she's a former SPAD/Comms person.
She used to be Head of Comms for the Tory party as well.
I think she might talking from a professional POV,
So?
She wouldn't be the first partner to be consulted on a potential new employee.
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
I'm not sure what relevance that has to the UK. And existence of precedent is not evidence that such a thing should be a non-story.
Man consults wife/fiancée for advice is a total non-story.
Do you never discuss anything with your significant other?
Do you need to repeat my earlier post?
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
What you said earlier is nonsense.
Of course Carrie has no Government role, but her views are not of no consequence. As the fiancée of the Prime Minister of course her views are of consequence just as every Prime Minister's partner is always of "consequence".
So your assumption is wrong. The rest of your post is wrong.
The question is: who leaked this to Kuenssburg? Assuming it wasn't Boris or Carrie, who in government knows, or was told, that Carrie effectively has a veto on government appointments?
On InfoWars, Steve Pieczenik, a former state department assistant secretary, and Tom Clancy co-writer turned QAnon truther, explained how the ‘voter fraud’ had been permitted by an all-seeing Trump because it was in fact an elaborate sting operation against his enemies: “We watermarked every ballot paper with blockchain technology…. We know very well where every one went. All of this was expected.” Or, to quote Q’s unofficial slogan: Trust The Plan.
Comments
In other news:
https://twitter.com/DavidHenigUK/status/1326505805424758789?s=20
The train of delusion, picking up speed for about four and a half years now, is about to finally crash into the buffers, and if mitigating steps aren't taken the results won't be pretty.
Has @HYUFD taken over and placed OGH in chains in Bedford Prison with @rcs1000 in permanent exile across the pond ??
‘Never trust anybody who spells gonorrhoea correctly on the first attempt’ is a maxim that has served me well in life, I might revise that maxim to ‘Never trust anybody who says a no deal Brexit will be fine.’ I suspect many MPs are also guided by the latter maxim.
No pics please.
Or as he likes to call them 'crotchfruit'.
Covid-19 outbreak at Manchester Piccadilly train station as 53 staff sent home
It's understood a staff member took a test on Monday before arriving for his shift on Tuesday, only to receive the positive result later that day
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-piccadilly-covid-19-outbreak-19257364
You'd have thought with half a billion quid in the balance someone might y'know be able to know what their rules actually are ?
I mean this sort of thing is unheard of in politics, I mean Nancy Reagan got Don Regan fired as Chief of Staff.
https://unherd.com/2020/11/why-qanon-will-always-be-right/
Although I did wonder what might happen, if our inbound 30,000,000 dose consignment from Pfizer Germany, gets held up for several months on the M2 lorry park, while HMRC check the manifests.
Presumably needs all main ballots to be rejected nationwide to come in.....(not sure if thats enough but no other way)
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/525390-republicans-who-could-serve-in-a-biden-government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JTtI3D6lqk
Do you never discuss anything with your significant other?
Or if it goes before Supreme Court and they dismiss it that would be an earlier event?
(Feel a personal interest since you once said you'd "followed" me into doing it.)
Only two options here, both of which include Laura Kuenssburg is an absolute joke of a journalist.
Firstly, Either this story is bollox, Carrie Symonds has no Government role and her view are of no consequence, let alone should be being reported breathlessly as pivotal by the BBC's chief political correspondent. This is just gossip peddling.
Or this story is accurate, Carrie Symonds now has the power to block key Government appointments, in which case THAT should be the story, not who gets appointed to the role.
https://twitter.com/nickgutteridge/status/1326515433923629056?s=20
https://twitter.com/jonvoight/status/1326323889417322497?s=20
Employees and employers do. They got a say on in 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2019. Had any one of those 4 gone differently we wouldn't have left the EU. Enough is enough now.
I know Corals, Ladbrokes, Paddy Power and the reast of the lamestream betting industry say my horse fell at the first fence and had to be shot. But they don't decide horse races - the courts do.
I'll be holding a major press conference at Radisson Blu Pest Control at 3pm to present some startling allegations about what really went down (actual evidence to follow at an unspecified point) - be there.
I have a bet with Ladbrokes at 6/1 to Trump will win four out of the following: Texas, Ohio, Georgia, Florida, Arizona and N Carolina. And a similar bet at 6/1 that he'll win five of them. That should put me ahead.
I'd have been much better off if I'd gone to bed at 10pm and got up at 8am.
Of course Carrie has no Government role, but her views are not of no consequence. As the fiancée of the Prime Minister of course her views are of consequence just as every Prime Minister's partner is always of "consequence".
So your assumption is wrong. The rest of your post is wrong.
So if you can bet against the doubters, do.
https://bidstats.uk/tenders/2020/W45/738131985
American reactionaries are often stuck in this strange register of a 1950s biblical epic ; it's the old Hollywood voice of the old testament.
p.s. despite praising certain champagnes, like Mike I gave up alcohol. In my case I haven't touched it since February 2019. I don't think drink or sleep are conducive to spread betting. Mind you, nor are everlasting suspended markets which is what happened to Spreadex.
https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1326519025552265216?s=21
One of my best ever bets was the one I made with my head against my gut at 2.30 am.
I have John King to thank and because I wasn't swayed by what was going on in Miami Dade. The clue to Biden's win lay in the suburbs, where he was getting at least a 5% swing from Hillary Clinton. That was robust enough to show me that selling Biden and buying Trump was panic by the markets based on 2016. If the Florida suburbs were swinging to Biden then the Midwest would too.
Which is also, by the way, why you should be very careful betting against the Democrats on Jan 5th in Georgia. The demographic of the state has changed a lot.
https://www.usnews.com/news/cities/articles/2020-11-09/georgias-political-shift-a-tale-of-urban-and-suburban-change
https://twitter.com/eddiemarsan/status/1323716007089852417?s=20
Whether you think that the respective numbers will be as currently projected, or whether you're absolutely crackers and think it'll change, the one thing we can agree on is that that will happen. If the market can settle a little early because Trump concedes and/or exhausts legal routes, then no doubt it will.
If the US descends into anarchy or aliens invade such that the Electoral College can't meet then at some point Betfair will presumably void the market. I'd say it's pretty bloody unlikely though.
Had the Government followed data from the ZOE app they would not have gone into a second lockdown, which he believes was unnecessary
The Government is tilted too much in the direction of caution and has lost a balanced sense of proportion
He is worried that they will use the new vaccine news as a “carrot” to keep us locked down for the next three months, when he believes it will likely take most of the year to get enough people vaccinated
He understands people’s concerns about such a new vaccine, and ZOE will be tracking any side effects from vaccinated people via its app
https://unherd.com/thepost/prof-tim-spector-lockdown-2-was-not-necessary/
Also when this guy was writing Tom Clancy stuff, it was 20 years ago. He seems to have properly gone off the deep end now.
Cruz abandoned Trump and now focusing on holding the Georgia Senate races and the Senate https://twitter.com/tedcruz/status/1326522793803059201?s=20
https://twitter.com/Politics_Polls/status/1326521985728442371?s=20