Options
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » So far Boris’s leader ratings are holding up well – but that c

The Wikipedia chart above shows all the leader ratings for the Prime Minister since the start of the year. As can be seen he has been doing pretty well during the pandemic with some very impressive figures. He’s had big positives throughout.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Democrats are working to ensure that doesn’t happen again by casting his stewardship over the virus and economy as a betrayal.
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/05/14/coronavirus-economic-collapse-rust-belt-trump-259657
"Waste everything except time"
Celebration time, my team, Crewe Alex, have got promoted....
The big thing the government got right , got lucky is already well on the ay to building this vaccine production facility and government pushed the fast forward button on getting it built 2 years early.
But yes, the slogan reminded me of great moments in our politics like the pasty tax and other things that of that ilk that passed all normal people by.
I'm sure my mother's reaction was fairly typical: "it's a bit wishy-washy but I suppose we've just got to be sensible."
white more likely to die than non white
rich more likely to die than poor
male more likely to die than female
Its different within a country, generally it is the poor and minorities in the rich countries who are suffering the worst so far.
Are you sure?
If transmission rate is 1 or below then number of cases will be logarithmically falling to zero - and from a low base after lockdown too. There may be cases transmitting but they will be as close to zero as possible.
The virus lasts longer on fabric than skin, so each time you are adjusting it you might be spreading the virus around, in a manner that wouldnt have happened without the mask.
Unfortunately we are no longer the factory of the world but we have remained wedded to free trade policies even when these have resulted in us running trade deficits for decades and the loss of manufacturing capacity here in the UK.
When we have an urgent need for PPE, along with everybody else, we find that getting this from our own much diminished manufacturing base is very difficult and needs a lot of gearing up. We also find that a lot of spivs and rather doubtful "traders" want to sell us a load of junk at a premium price. And so we end up taking a while to source PPE.
Was there something else you wanted to know?
Its worth noting that early on in this pandemic PPE was being used at over 50x the normal rate. That means every single week we're using an entire year's stockpile of PPE - and at no stage was there a national run out of PPE, though there were some logistical issues with getting it out early on.
All very amusing but i am less amused by the vehement backlash against the very tentative and limited opening of schools. This seems entirely reasonable to me and middle class parents who want zero risk in their lives are risking causing great damage to a lot of children in circumstances at home where they are getting little or no home schooling and possibly even not enough food etc etc
It must be time to get kids back to school at least a bit - the damage being done to our children in such circumstances is a real concern. Jocasta and Tarquin will be fine but not all kids are in such fortunate situations.
If Denmark can do it surely so can we.
A wise manager once told me: Don't say "No because", say "Yes if..."
The box of 50 masks we got today have come here from China. Which is a bit ironic, really.
Which governments didn't, so that we have a valid comparison base?
We were using over 50x the normal rate of PPE and never ran out, how you think that is "doing nothing" is beyond me.
Have they confirmed what quarantine is yet? Is it just dont go out but we wont check?
Now that exposes a strategic weakness that needs to be addressed, but it does rather complicate things in the short term.
"A wise man knows that he must put things into perspective, but a still wiser man knows what perspective to put them into. A doctor who tells the widow of a patient who has just died that, after all, her husband’s was only one of 2,800,000 deaths a year in the United States alone (56,000,000 worldwide) is a monster of insensitivity. But an epidemiologist who tries to express his compassion for every death that he enumerates will never progress beyond his first statistical table. The proper perspective changes with context.
What is the correct perspective into which the average citizen should put the current pandemic of the coronavirus, assuming that there is a single correct perspective for him to put it into? Most people, I surmise, veer between complacency and panic. They are like home investors who follow the fluctuations of the stock market with febrile attention. A graph showing exponential growth in the number of cases induces a state of anxiety; a histogram showing a decline in the number of deaths the day before causes a burst of relief that the worst is over."
https://www.firstthings.com/article/2020/06/catastrophism-and-control
The government negligently failed to prepare for a looming pandemic. Perhaps it would have done better if the Prime Minister had bothered to turn up to the Cobra meetings discussing it. Or even decided not to take half of February off as a holiday.
Is that complicated to understand?
https://order-order.com/2020/05/15/ryan-plumber-abuse-hes-received-understanding-stay-alert-messaging/
I note that not even you this time attempt the amazing contortion of trying to persuade the world that the Prime Minister is simultaneously near-perfect and completely irrelevant to the government's performance.
No trading agreements have protected anyone from this.
The reality is the range has changed from "0.5 to 0.9" to "0.7 to 1".
If we had double available, we would have used more and front line staff would have been better protected. If we had 10x more we would have used much more and not only front line staff but also other workers in supermarkets, buses etc would have had more access too.
We had problems with it but broadly on PPE have done ok, nothing special either way - not everything has to be a big success or a big failure.
I am very glad our PM is not someone like Trump across the pond. Now that is truly enraging and shows someone truly negligent.
And the US will do what the US wants.
And the EU will do what the EU wants.
The sooner we understand the reality of those 3 statements and the implications for the UK the sooner we can have a realistic trade and foreign policy.
When you've got a limited resource and are using 50x your normal stocks it does make sense to ration access via medical priorities.
Nelson Teich resigned after less than a month in the job having replaced Luiz Henrique Mandetta, who was dismissed.
Bolsonaro on Monday declared gyms and hair salons as essential services that can stay open through the new coronavirus outbreak, but Teich said his ministry had not been consulted. Brazilian media say the final straw appears to have been Bolsonaro's backing for chloroquine as a treatment, despite it being of no proven benefit.
Facebook is buying Giphy and integrating it with Instagram
https://www.theverge.com/2020/5/15/21259965/facebook-giphy-gif-acquisition-buy-instagram-integration-cost
"They do not factor in the changes to lockdown announced by the prime minister on Sunday."
----
Also,
Claims there are now just 24 cases a day in the capital and that it could soon be free of the virus have been slammed. There were in fact 49 people admitted to London hospitals with Covid-19 yesterday and likely hundreds of cases that did not need hospital treatment.
"I am extremely worried about the media message that London could be coronavirus free in days," said Prof Matt Keeling, from the University of Warwick.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52677194
As the number of cases in the wider community drops, the transmission in hospitals and care homes becomes ever more dominant. We know that transmission has been higher in these settings for a while, although we don't know how much transmission is contained within these settings and how much is escaping.
If there were more community cases, then R would actually be lower.
If you honestly think calling it a hoax is better then you're so far devoid from reality its ridiculous!
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-52637283
I know nothing about this NAT test they are using. Is it accurate? How does it differ from the PCR test? Why are they using it rather than PCR?
The proportion of "new" people tested is bound to go down over time, if enough tests are available.
Here he is ! The vanquisher of viruses... The epitome of epidemiology!