politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » A British Gift – the ECHR
What is it about the European Convention on Human Rights which so riles some on the right (and, if reports are to be believed, the PM’s closest advisor)?
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
If the policy in the UK is to allow the virus to spread in order to get herd immunity then surely it makes sense to isolate those most at risk of dying.
Are we clear thst creating herd immunity is actually the policy? It seems like one of the boffins mentioned it but the people involved in making the model seem saying this is just an inevitable outcome, rather than the goal. Then a bunch of people who *support* the government seem to be jumping on it because it gives them a way to claim the delay and confusion was part of a cunning and brilliant expert plan, rather than the British getting knocked on their arses like everybody else without recent SARS experience.
Yes it is the government position. It was first mentioned by a member of the behavioural insight team, but has since been confirmed by the two big egg-heads leading this. It definitely isn't just a Cummings lacky speaking out of turn.
UK's chief scientific adviser tells ITV News he hopes Government's approach to coronavirus will create 'herd immunity'
I note from Worldometer the number of serious/ critical Diamond Princess patients has fallen from 32 to 15. With 7 deaths the maximum possible fatality rate there is therefore down to 22/696 or 3.1%.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
Well people say that, lets see if we offer everybody a Chinese style surveillance app if they will accept it? That will keep us much safer and more secure.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
They are very good headers, but not unrelated to Coronavirus. Ms @Cyclefree is making productive time from her sensible seclusion.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
They are very good headers, but not unrelated to Coronavirus. Ms @Cyclefree is making productive time from her sensible seclusion.
Isaac Newton invented calculus while secluded from Cambridge by the plague of 1665.
Perhaps this is the core of the objections. If you think that a sovereign nation should be free to do whatever it wants, why accept any constitutional or other restraint on Parliamentary sovereignty?
This is the crux of your excellent article. The overly expansive claim that the will of the people justifies anything is as old as democracy.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
People want both, but if liberty threatens security then security will tend to win out, because security speaks to the more basic need of survival. It's what ruined the coalition's attempts to state build in Iraq - quite beyond the difficulties of imposing a democratic system in a country with no democratic tradition of its own, they failed to provide basic security. Thus, the project never stood a chance.
The trade off between liberty and security needn't necessarily lead to sinister outcomes, of course. Liberty was very heavily curtailed in favour of security in wartime Britain, but it was a necessary evil so that liberty could survive and be restored in the longer term.
FWIW, not all people by any means are begging for the Government to enact Draconian measures at this stage - it's just that those who do are scared stiff and panicking, happen to have very loud voices, or some combination of the two.
If the policy in the UK is to allow the virus to spread in order to get herd immunity then surely it makes sense to isolate those most at risk of dying.
Are we clear thst creating herd immunity is actually the policy? It seems like one of the boffins mentioned it but the people involved in making the model seem saying this is just an inevitable outcome, rather than the goal. Then a bunch of people who *support* the government seem to be jumping on it because it gives them a way to claim the delay and confusion was part of a cunning and brilliant expert plan, rather than the British getting knocked on their arses like everybody else without recent SARS experience.
Yes it is the government position. It was first mentioned by a member of the behavioural insight team, but has since been confirmed by the two big egg-heads leading this. It definitely isn't just a Cummings lacky speaking out of turn.
UK's chief scientific adviser tells ITV News he hopes Government's approach to coronavirus will create 'herd immunity'
The term 'herd immunity' does indeed feature quite prominently in UKG's strategic communication. No other countries' authorities have chosen to do so.
What the UK does, might still turn out to be the optimal approach, too early to tell. But there seem to be people who feel that it is just a cravenly cynical euphemism for "we're at the end of our tether", on par with "WTO Brexit" or "Australian Deal style trade relations".
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Displaced sales, rather than new sales. Who knows what life is going to be like in 4 weeks. We might all be under curfew and only allowed to go shopping once a week.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
Well people say that, lets see if we offer everybody a Chinese style surveillance app if they will accept it? That will keep us much safer and more secure.
Surveillance app? I reckon the government told people they were planning to put a microchip in all our bottoms to provide enhanced contact tracing most people would, quite literally, bend over for it.
I am unfortunately of the opinion that one outcome of this crisis will be that people will be much more accepting of government intrusion into all our lives.
I also worry that authoritarian governments around the world will prosper as people look to strongmen to "do something".
Legal protection for our human rights are more important today than ever.
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Why? Currently they are flat out servicing demand of low margin products with unprecedented demand for home delivery which actually costs them money on every delivery. And when proper disruption comes? They will be able to partly function with greatly reduced demand. And afterwards? The era of cheap food sourced from afar will be over. And with a populace poorer than before unable to afford not cheap food in as much quantities...
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
It's a hierarchy of needs thing.
People want prosperity and security.
The environment most likely to be bring prosperity is one with a lot of personal freedom - to start businesses, to export and to import.
But this also means there is less security.
If you don't bring prosperity to your people when there are no existential threats, you're out on your arse.
And if you don't bring security when there are, you're skewered on a stake.
If we really are on a war footing, the other thing that needs to end is the invisible PM.
There should be daily press conferences, on the BBC.
Selectively briefing a few pet journalists who then 'debate' the news on Twitter is not helping, and the BBC boycott is beyond petty.
Does there really need to be a daily mass panic briefing at this stage?
If we're still meant to be keeping calm and carrying on (as best we can, anyway) they appearances by the head of Government morning, noon and night - preceded and followed by reams and reams of largely ill-informed "analysis," "debate" and "comment" in all forms of media, anti-social and otherwise - is surely the last thing on Earth than we need?
Better that Boris Johnson only appears to give an update when there is something significant to say, so that new messages - for example, when the order goes out to the elderly to self-isolate - attract appropriate attention. If he's droning on about bog roll supplies in Dorset or hospitalisations in Kettering every five bloody minutes then people will tune out, and his considerable value as a communicator of key information will be lost.
I note from Worldometer the number of serious/ critical Diamond Princess patients has fallen from 32 to 15. With 7 deaths the maximum possible fatality rate there is therefore down to 22/696 or 3.1%.
Pretty damn good considering the age mix. Set against that most of them have received care outside of a warzone environment.
The Guardian live blog has an update on government efforts to boost ventilator production. Sounds like manufacturers are already working on this, as you'd hope.
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Displaced sales, rather than new sales. Who knows what life is going to be like in 4 weeks. We might all be under curfew and only allowed to go shopping once a week.
Assuming normal stocking resumes, surely a lot of this food is going to be wasted. People will be having Corona parties to get through it all
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Displaced sales, rather than new sales. Who knows what life is going to be like in 4 weeks. We might all be under curfew and only allowed to go shopping once a week.
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Why? Currently they are flat out servicing demand of low margin products with unprecedented demand for home delivery which actually costs them money on every delivery. And when proper disruption comes? They will be able to partly function with greatly reduced demand. And afterwards? The era of cheap food sourced from afar will be over. And with a populace poorer than before unable to afford not cheap food in as much quantities...
Why would this episode have a long-term impact on the price of imported food? If anything it may very well get cheaper: imports from outside of the EU need no longer attract tariffs intended to price out cheaper global producers, to the advantage of southern and central European smallholders.
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Displaced sales, rather than new sales. Who knows what life is going to be like in 4 weeks. We might all be under curfew and only allowed to go shopping once a week.
Assuming normal stocking resumes, surely a lot of this food is going to be wasted. People will be having Corona parties to get through it all
If the food goes off after a few weeks people aren't panic buying properly.
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Displaced sales, rather than new sales. Who knows what life is going to be like in 4 weeks. We might all be under curfew and only allowed to go shopping once a week.
Assuming normal stocking resumes, surely a lot of this food is going to be wasted. People will be having Corona parties to get through it all
Food banks will welcome any tinned stuff people dont need for the winter.
The Guardian live blog has an update on government efforts to boost ventilator production. Sounds like manufacturers are already working on this, as you'd hope.
I really would have hoped they had done this 2-3 weeks ago. Lets just hope they can get a load made before the bomb goes off. It is clear from that link, that Boris has now told them if you make it, we will buy it. Hopefully it is possible to ramp up production.
The Guardian live blog has an update on government efforts to boost ventilator production. Sounds like manufacturers are already working on this, as you'd hope.
If you were a business that could, why wouldn’t you maximise production even without being told to? It’s pretty clear there’s a market for them. One would hope capacity is ramping up world wide. You have to really worry about the developing world though.
Ms Cyclefree, could I suggest you save these very lengthy articles for July after coronavirus has peaked as they are not getting full attention at the moment
Isn't it interesting how we're barely two weeks into a crisis and with the dead only just in double digits, people are already begging for the government to clamp down on our freedoms, close our borders and restrict movement.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
It's a hierarchy of needs thing.
People want prosperity and security.
The environment most likely to be bring prosperity is one with a lot of personal freedom - to start businesses, to export and to import.
But this also means there is less security.
If you don't bring prosperity to your people when there are no existential threats, you're out on your arse.
And if you don't bring security when there are, you're skewered on a stake.
Also, as things change, the importance of each of the needs relative to each other changes. When you are affluent and secure, the physiological and safety needs no longer seem so important [but only because they have been met] and our conscious attention turns to belonging and love, esteem, and purpose greater than self, and so these seem to assume greater relative importance. Strip away safety from even the most affluent, and their attention refocuses back on it and away from the loftier needs.
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Displaced sales, rather than new sales. Who knows what life is going to be like in 4 weeks. We might all be under curfew and only allowed to go shopping once a week.
Assuming normal stocking resumes, surely a lot of this food is going to be wasted. People will be having Corona parties to get through it all
I note from Worldometer the number of serious/ critical Diamond Princess patients has fallen from 32 to 15. With 7 deaths the maximum possible fatality rate there is therefore down to 22/696 or 3.1%.
You are assuming none of the 233 active cases become critical and lead to fatalities. I am not sure that's necessarily a safe assumption.
The Guardian live blog has an update on government efforts to boost ventilator production. Sounds like manufacturers are already working on this, as you'd hope.
I really would have hoped they had done this 2-3 weeks ago. Lets just hope they can get a load made before the bomb goes off. It is clear from that link, that Boris has now told them if you make it, we will buy it. Hopefully it is possible to ramp up production.
If they are sensible the emergency powers bill will have a provision for nationalisation. If they try to price gouge, they can simply be nationalised at a price of the government's choosing.
Nobody is confident there is a vaccine coming in the next 18 months and we aren't the only ones convinced there will be multiple waves, China are operating under this working theory (hence the tracking apps, the building of capacity, etc).
The big risk for me is we don't have best practice how to treat people and it is possible that some existing drugs are highly effective...we will have a better idea of that in a few months. And obviously crashing the system.
The Guardian live blog has an update on government efforts to boost ventilator production. Sounds like manufacturers are already working on this, as you'd hope.
I really would have hoped they had done this 2-3 weeks ago. Lets just hope they can get a load made before the bomb goes off. It is clear from that link, that Boris has now told them if you make it, we will buy it. Hopefully it is possible to ramp up production.
Not yet - the call is not until Monday. Although why we have to wait until after a weekend stumps me.
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Displaced sales, rather than new sales. Who knows what life is going to be like in 4 weeks. We might all be under curfew and only allowed to go shopping once a week.
Assuming normal stocking resumes, surely a lot of this food is going to be wasted. People will be having Corona parties to get through it all
The Guardian live blog has an update on government efforts to boost ventilator production. Sounds like manufacturers are already working on this, as you'd hope.
I really would have hoped they had done this 2-3 weeks ago. Lets just hope they can get a load made before the bomb goes off. It is clear from that link, that Boris has now told them if you make it, we will buy it. Hopefully it is possible to ramp up production.
Not yet - the call is not until Monday. Although why we have to wait until after a weekend stumps me.
It makes zero sense for manufacturers to not have already started.
Nobody is confident there is a vaccine coming in the next 18 months and we aren't the only ones convinced there will be multiple waves, China are operating under this working theory (hence the tracking apps, the building of capacity, etc).
The big risk for me is we don't have best practice and it is possible that some existing drugs are highly effective...we will have a better idea of that in a few months.
Yep. Until proved otherwise I don't see why we don't assume waves. 1918-1919.
The Guardian live blog has an update on government efforts to boost ventilator production. Sounds like manufacturers are already working on this, as you'd hope.
I really would have hoped they had done this 2-3 weeks ago. Lets just hope they can get a load made before the bomb goes off. It is clear from that link, that Boris has now told them if you make it, we will buy it. Hopefully it is possible to ramp up production.
Not yet - the call is not until Monday. Although why we have to wait until after a weekend stumps me.
If they have leaked this to the press, my guess is they have already been given the nod by officials to get cracking...it is simply signing it off with a chat from the PM and the requirement for a new bill in parliament on Monday.
Nobody is confident there is a vaccine coming in the next 18 months and we aren't the only ones convinced there will be multiple waves, China are operating under this working theory (hence the tracking apps, the building of capacity, etc).
The big risk for me is we don't have best practice how to treat people and it is possible that some existing drugs are highly effective...we will have a better idea of that in a few months. And obviously crashing the system.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb is nothing if not supremely confident in his own views, always.
I note from Worldometer the number of serious/ critical Diamond Princess patients has fallen from 32 to 15. With 7 deaths the maximum possible fatality rate there is therefore down to 22/696 or 3.1%.
You are assuming none of the 233 active cases become critical and lead to fatalities. I am not sure that's necessarily a safe assumption.
You’d think supermarket shares ought to be going up, with this bumper volume of sales.
Displaced sales, rather than new sales. Who knows what life is going to be like in 4 weeks. We might all be under curfew and only allowed to go shopping once a week.
Assuming normal stocking resumes, surely a lot of this food is going to be wasted. People will be having Corona parties to get through it all
If the food goes off after a few weeks people aren't panic buying properly.
Presumably they know how to cook toilet roll properly?
Whereas everywhere else is banking the virus doesn't come in waves.
It does genuinely seem to come down to most of the world planning on repeatedly snuffing-out outbreaks until treatments or vaccines arrive. An optimisists approach if you like. Versus the UK, and perhaps a couple of other countries, taking a pessimistic approach of controling an outbreak and gaining some degree of immunity for future outbreaks in order to lessen their effects. This approach be chosen on the assumption we can't reapeatedly lockdown everything and rely on a vaccine being developed soon.
You can see why the optimists get such widespread public support, but I don't think there's any reason to assume at this stage that anybody knows the right thing to do.
Whereas everywhere else is banking the virus doesn't come in waves.
No, just planning to be better prepared next time. ICU capacity, staff training, protective equipment, pharmaceuticals, research, treatment protocols, rapid diagnostic testing. Perhaps even effective antiviral and/or vaccines.
The Guardian live blog has an update on government efforts to boost ventilator production. Sounds like manufacturers are already working on this, as you'd hope.
I really would have hoped they had done this 2-3 weeks ago. Lets just hope they can get a load made before the bomb goes off. It is clear from that link, that Boris has now told them if you make it, we will buy it. Hopefully it is possible to ramp up production.
Not yet - the call is not until Monday. Although why we have to wait until after a weekend stumps me.
Monday is probably making official what is already happening. Just as the last Monday Cobra meeting was really the culmination of a huge amount of work that began in January.
Whereas everywhere else is banking the virus doesn't come in waves.
It does genuinely seem to come down to most of the world planning on repeatedly snuffing-out outbreaks until treatments or vaccines arrive. An optimisists approach if you like. Versus the UK, and perhaps a couple of other countries, taking a pessimistic approach of controling an outbreak and gaining some degree of immunity for future outbreaks in order to lessen their effects. This approach be chosen on the assumption we can't reapeatedly lockdown everything and rely on a vaccine being developed soon.
You can see why the optimists get such widespread public support, but I don't think there's any reason to assume at this stage that anybody knows the right thing to do.
I am not sure the UK is quite as isolated in this decision as being made out, it is simply the UK government have been totally honest what it means e.g. Merkel talked about 70% of people getting it...that clearly isn't compatible with a strategy to hide for 3 months and think it will have gone away.
Comments
UK's chief scientific adviser tells ITV News he hopes Government's approach to coronavirus will create 'herd immunity'
https://www.itv.com/news/2020-03-13/uk-s-chief-scientific-adviser-tells-itv-news-he-hopes-government-s-approach-to-coronavirus-will-create-herd-immunity/
However, I need a full night's sleep before I'm in a position to digest it.
People don't really want freedom, they want security, and they want a strong government to give it to them.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-51892477
"Foreign Office AGREED to abide by international law"?
There should be daily press conferences, on the BBC.
Selectively briefing a few pet journalists who then 'debate' the news on Twitter is not helping, and the BBC boycott is beyond petty.
Others, not so much.
It would have been one heck of a career change.
Night.
This is the crux of your excellent article.
The overly expansive claim that the will of the people justifies anything is as old as democracy.
The trade off between liberty and security needn't necessarily lead to sinister outcomes, of course. Liberty was very heavily curtailed in favour of security in wartime Britain, but it was a necessary evil so that liberty could survive and be restored in the longer term.
FWIW, not all people by any means are begging for the Government to enact Draconian measures at this stage - it's just that those who do are scared stiff and panicking, happen to have very loud voices, or some combination of the two.
No other countries' authorities have chosen to do so.
What the UK does, might still turn out to be the optimal approach, too early to tell.
But there seem to be people who feel that it is just a cravenly cynical euphemism for "we're at the end of our tether", on par with "WTO Brexit" or "Australian Deal style trade relations".
The closure of thousands of Acute Beds since 2010 is going to cost thousands of lives and the UK taxpayer dear.
NHS smallest number of Acute beds per 10000 population and reduced by 1/3 since 2010
correction: are
I am unfortunately of the opinion that one outcome of this crisis will be that people will be much more accepting of government intrusion into all our lives.
I also worry that authoritarian governments around the world will prosper as people look to strongmen to "do something".
Legal protection for our human rights are more important today than ever.
People want prosperity and security.
The environment most likely to be bring prosperity is one with a lot of personal freedom - to start businesses, to export and to import.
But this also means there is less security.
If you don't bring prosperity to your people when there are no existential threats, you're out on your arse.
And if you don't bring security when there are, you're skewered on a stake.
If we're still meant to be keeping calm and carrying on (as best we can, anyway) they appearances by the head of Government morning, noon and night - preceded and followed by reams and reams of largely ill-informed "analysis," "debate" and "comment" in all forms of media, anti-social and otherwise - is surely the last thing on Earth than we need?
Better that Boris Johnson only appears to give an update when there is something significant to say, so that new messages - for example, when the order goes out to the elderly to self-isolate - attract appropriate attention. If he's droning on about bog roll supplies in Dorset or hospitalisations in Kettering every five bloody minutes then people will tune out, and his considerable value as a communicator of key information will be lost.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/mar/14/coronavirus-live-updates-uk-us-australia-italy-europe-school-shutdown-sport-events-cancelled-latest-update-news
Pure oxygen by mask or nasal prongs may well be beneficial. Limited supply though.
They might learn something.
https://twitter.com/MollyNagle3/status/1238881953534918662?s=19
The big risk for me is we don't have best practice how to treat people and it is possible that some existing drugs are highly effective...we will have a better idea of that in a few months. And obviously crashing the system.
No, it really wont.
I will never get the time back from reading the opening sections of the Black Swan. Never.
Any reason why the 'Spanish' flu was different?
It does feel a bit like the Eurovisions whereby no matter what is done objectively there will be people telling us we are wrong and shit.
A full refund will be given in the form of a credit against a holiday next year.
(a stronger word is available, if you prefer).
I just feel helpless.
Twitter has created a new emoji to encourage handwashing during the coronavirus outbreak.
You can see why the optimists get such widespread public support, but I don't think there's any reason to assume at this stage that anybody knows the right thing to do.
I rate the chance of a wide spread epidemic worse than Ebola in my life time at over 50%....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AEMKudv5p0
Clouds, silver linings, and all that.