Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Brecon & Radnorshire: the by-election that never was?

SystemSystem Posts: 12,171
edited June 2019 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Brecon & Radnorshire: the by-election that never was?

The problem with being spoilt for excitement politically (apart from the complete wreckage of the party system, trust in politics and – who knows – maybe the country itself) is that there’s no time to sit back and appreciate what’s just gone before the next instalment arrives.

Read the full story here


«1345

Comments

  • asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276
    Does the writ need to be voted on or just moved by an MP?
  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    The Birmingham Ladywood by-election was also the most recent one in which any candidate got a plural multiple of 111 votes.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited June 2019

    Does the writ need to be voted on or just moved by an MP?

    The second paragraph caught my eye....

    A writ must be moved in the House of Commons to trigger each by-election that takes place. It is customary for a member of the party which previously held the seat to move the writ. Normally, this takes place not long after the seat becomes vacant, so that the seat’s constituents are not left without representation in the House for longer than necessary. Occasionally, however, there may be a significant delay between the vacancy and the by-election, or the vacancy and the issuing of the writ.

    It is also possible for the Speaker to issue a writ during a recess period. When this occurs, the Speaker informs the House when it next sits.


    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06576#fullreport
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    The LD might move the writ. Although this is in defiance of convention this is something they did in Oldham East in 2010 after Phill Woolas was removed as MP by the courts. My understanding is that the LDs are planning for a by-election as soon as possible and hundreds of activists will be heading there this weekend. My guess is that the first by-election campaign leaflets will have been printed overnight to go out today.

    Delivering to a seat of this size is a massive undertaking but the party is fired up
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Summat funny going on in Gulf airspace.....BA, Air France, KLM and Qantas are avoiding overflying Iran, while SQ, MAS, Lufthansa, Swiss & Finnair aren't....a few days after the Dutch charge people with shooting down MH17....
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,712
    Was this posted last night? From quick scan couldn't see it.

    Sunday Times YouGov poll of Con members:

    Johnson 74
    Hunt 26

    (On 16 May 2019 it was Johnson 67 Hunt 33)

    80% certain of choice
    19% might change mind

    47% Johnson can be trusted
    40% Johnson cannot be trusted

    52% Hunt can be trusted
    31% Hunt cannot be trusted

    71% Happy if Johnson leader
    19% Unhappy

    41% Happy if Hunt leader
    31% Unhappy

    65% support pact with Brexit Party
    27% oppose
    8% Don't Know

  • tpfkartpfkar Posts: 1,565
    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,712
    YouGov poll obviously conducted before last night's revelations.

    But even so, shows an incredibly strong position for Johnson. Surely something more serious would have to be reported / happen to put significant dent into lead (ie to get it anywhere near to say 60:40).
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    I wasn’t aware writs went to a vote?
  • eristdooferistdoof Posts: 5,065
    JohnLoony said:

    The Birmingham Ladywood by-election was also the most recent one in which any candidate got a plural multiple of 111 votes.

    Have you really gone through every by-election result for every candidate since 1977, to find this out?
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 38,868
    First day in LA over, holy fuck the traffic is terrible. That's my main take away from it.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491
    What a difference a day makes.
  • eristdooferistdoof Posts: 5,065
    So an MP breaks the law and is convicted. 19% of his constituents vote to remove him and he "decides" he will stand again. How breathtakingly arrogant is that.
  • JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    eristdoof said:

    JohnLoony said:

    The Birmingham Ladywood by-election was also the most recent one in which any candidate got a plural multiple of 111 votes.

    Have you really gone through every by-election result for every candidate since 1977, to find this out?
    Of course I did. How else would I have found out? I was looking for the numbers of votes for candidates in which only 1 digit was used. There are a few single-digit numbers; there are loads of 2-digit numbers from 11 to 99, but there are only about 7 examples of a candidate getting 111 votes. You have to go back to 1977 to find a candidate with a multiple of 111; in this case the National Front candidate got 888 votes.
  • eristdooferistdoof Posts: 5,065
    JohnLoony said:

    eristdoof said:

    JohnLoony said:

    The Birmingham Ladywood by-election was also the most recent one in which any candidate got a plural multiple of 111 votes.

    Have you really gone through every by-election result for every candidate since 1977, to find this out?
    Of course I did. How else would I have found out? I was looking for the numbers of votes for candidates in which only 1 digit was used. There are a few single-digit numbers; there are loads of 2-digit numbers from 11 to 99, but there are only about 7 examples of a candidate getting 111 votes. You have to go back to 1977 to find a candidate with a multiple of 111; in this case the National Front candidate got 888 votes.
    Impressive,...
    but have you included 1221 as a multiple of 111 or are you just just looking for results containing just one unique digit?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    And there is still the awful possibility that we might look back on this year as the calm before the storm...
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Was there a twinkle in OGH's eye when the "Bonking Boris Bust Up" story hit the newswires ? .... There certainly was.

    Our erstwhile Prime Minister most surely is the gift that keeps on giving. Boris will provide more wonderful threads than a host a Savile Row tailors.

    Whatever the full story of the latest Boris contretemps turn out to be we may be sure of one thing. It has opened the door to the press on the colourful nature of his private life. Neither is this just a "Guardianista" moment as we may see from the all the front pages.

    The question that follows is whether the Conservative members care and whether they dismiss the incident and others that may follow as just part of Boris's "charm" and macho buffoonery.

    I suspect they will. Just as the majority of Conservative MP's have overlooked Boris's manifest shortcomings I believe that a substantial majority of members will do likewise. Their mantra seems to be :

    "We Want Boris And We Don't Care"
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    JackW said:

    "We Want Boris And We Don't Care"


  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    eristdoof said:

    So an MP breaks the law and is convicted. 19% of his constituents vote to remove him and he "decides" he will stand again. How breathtakingly arrogant is that.

    Presumably the recall legislation allows only one recall per offence, otherwise we (and Davies) could be trapped in a never-ending loop of re-election followed by recall for the same expenses fraud.

    More seriously, as @Cyclefree has noted, re-selecting Davies is not a good look for the Conservative Party. Laura Norder must be spinning in her grave.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653
    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    Tories are mad (if not a touch arrogant) to go with the same candidate.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Thanks for the thread Herders.

    One point that I made yesterday but is worth repeating as it's directly thread related.

    If the Conservative believe that the seat is lost they may decide to move the writ quickly so that Theresa May takes the fall rather than the shiny new Prime Minister.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    Perhaps, perhaps not. We must assume the couple still have feelings for each other but in any case, voters have already priced in Boris's colourful and at times disreputable private life.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,478

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Question is, is he spending the weekend with her? If he is, then clearly they've 'kissed and made up'. Or something like it.
    If he isn't ..........
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Does impact his choice of chancellor? Neighbors matter. He’ll want someone hard of hearing in no11.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    JackW said:

    Thanks for the thread Herders.

    One point that I made yesterday but is worth repeating as it's directly thread related.

    If the Conservative believe that the seat is lost they may decide to move the writ quickly so that Theresa May takes the fall rather than the shiny new Prime Minister.

    Lol @ shiny. Such irony.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    JackW said:

    Was there a twinkle in OGH's eye when the "Bonking Boris Bust Up" story hit the newswires ? .... There certainly was.

    Our erstwhile Prime Minister most surely is the gift that keeps on giving. Boris will provide more wonderful threads than a host a Savile Row tailors.

    Whatever the full story of the latest Boris contretemps turn out to be we may be sure of one thing. It has opened the door to the press on the colourful nature of his private life. Neither is this just a "Guardianista" moment as we may see from the all the front pages.

    The question that follows is whether the Conservative members care and whether they dismiss the incident and others that may follow as just part of Boris's "charm" and macho buffoonery.

    I suspect they will. Just as the majority of Conservative MP's have overlooked Boris's manifest shortcomings I believe that a substantial majority of members will do likewise. Their mantra seems to be :

    "We Want Boris And We Don't Care"

    It would be nice if he were erstwhile. Preferably before he got started.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Question is, is he spending the weekend with her? If he is, then clearly they've 'kissed and made up'. Or something like it.
    If he isn't ..........
    Brum today for hustings, a quiet night away might be in oder, but unlikely.

    The first day of the contest had the Field incident, the B and R recall, then Boris having a domestic row. What can today bring? Must stock up on popcorn...
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Question is, is he spending the weekend with her? If he is, then clearly they've 'kissed and made up'. Or something like it.
    If he isn't ..........

    Kissing and making up is part and parcel of countless abusive relationships. But I just don’t see how this story harms Johnson. He is to Tory members what Corbyn is to Labour ones. There is literally nothing he can say or do that will harm his standing. Any negative story about him is dismissed as being driven by an agenda. The one difference between the pair is that Johnson is also backed by his party’s MPs.

  • nielhnielh Posts: 1,307

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Why should it? There is no suggestion that he has objectively done anything wrong. It is just an invasion of privacy.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    I was never going to vote for the buffoon anyway so you are entirely correct.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Why do I get so strong a feeling that, far from being a man on the march and carrying all before him, Boris Johnson is a broken politician? It’s hard to put this in any way that sounds rational but I have a feeling that, even as he wins, he has already lost the mojo that his teamsters praise in Bojo.

    Something has died. And the cause? I think it was Mr Gove.

    Impostors almost always know they are impostors, and Mr Johnson is nothing if not self-aware. I diagnose here a man who, when the sound of cheering, ringing in his ears, begins to fade, knows what thin ice he’s on, and how shallow is the politics beneath the dazzling polish of the surface.


    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/hunt-should-play-the-man-and-not-the-ball-fxkqm2w2n
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 22,847

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    Perhaps, perhaps not. We must assume the couple still have feelings for each other but in any case, voters have already priced in Boris's colourful and at times disreputable private life.
    Even if Tory members have already fully priced it in, the country as a whole have not. The chance of anything but gridlock and paralysis at the next GE have lengthened as has the chance of an early election.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,478
    Foxy said:

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Question is, is he spending the weekend with her? If he is, then clearly they've 'kissed and made up'. Or something like it.
    If he isn't ..........
    Brum today for hustings, a quiet night away might be in oder, but unlikely.

    The first day of the contest had the Field incident, the B and R recall, then Boris having a domestic row. What can today bring? Must stock up on popcorn...
    England lost the ODI as well.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    Perhaps, perhaps not. We must assume the couple still have feelings for each other but in any case, voters have already priced in Boris's colourful and at times disreputable private life.

    None of us know what it was that attracted her toward the millionaire favourite to become most powerful man in the land.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,914

    Does the writ need to be voted on or just moved by an MP?

    The second paragraph caught my eye....

    A writ must be moved in the House of Commons to trigger each by-election that takes place. It is customary for a member of the party which previously held the seat to move the writ. Normally, this takes place not long after the seat becomes vacant, so that the seat’s constituents are not left without representation in the House for longer than necessary. Occasionally, however, there may be a significant delay between the vacancy and the by-election, or the vacancy and the issuing of the writ.

    It is also possible for the Speaker to issue a writ during a recess period. When this occurs, the Speaker informs the House when it next sits.


    https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06576#fullreport
    ... and Bercow doesn't have much to lose with the Tories.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    Well, duh, obviously!

    All parties try to get dates for by elections to suit them.

    Though a GE win may well be fair compensation for not having a by election.

  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    Perhaps, perhaps not. We must assume the couple still have feelings for each other but in any case, voters have already priced in Boris's colourful and at times disreputable private life.

    None of us know what it was that attracted her toward the millionaire favourite to become most powerful man in the land.
    Proven fertility? B)
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    And the Conservatives won't move the writ at the best time for their party?

    Pleazzzzzzzzzzzze !!!!
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Apple News is spamming the Standard's analysis of Boris's campaign to its subscribers.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    A question:

    It is perfectly legal for second home owners to be on the electoral register at both homes as can vote in local elections at both. In a GE they are only allowed to vote in one place, but presumably can vote in this byelection. Is this correct, and how many second homes are their in this delightful and accessible part of Wales?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    JackW said:

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    And the Conservatives won't move the writ at the best time for their party?

    Pleazzzzzzzzzzzze !!!!
    What is best for the Tory party is best for the country.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    Foxy said:

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    Well, duh, obviously!

    All parties try to get dates for by elections to suit them.

    Though a GE win may well be fair compensation for not having a by election.

    Party before constituents.

    It may be inconvenient because of the Royal Welsh. Party before constituents.

    It may be a low turn-out because of Summer vacation. Party before constituents.

    It may be unnecessary because we are heading towards a GE. Party before constituents.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    MikeL said:

    Was this posted last night? From quick scan couldn't see it.

    Sunday Times YouGov poll of Con members:

    Johnson 74
    Hunt 26

    (On 16 May 2019 it was Johnson 67 Hunt 33)

    80% certain of choice
    19% might change mind

    47% Johnson can be trusted
    40% Johnson cannot be trusted

    52% Hunt can be trusted
    31% Hunt cannot be trusted

    71% Happy if Johnson leader
    19% Unhappy

    41% Happy if Hunt leader
    31% Unhappy

    65% support pact with Brexit Party
    27% oppose
    8% Don't Know

    This may prove to be the most important news last night for the result of the Conservative leadership contest. Don’t overlook it.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,238
    MikeL said:

    YouGov poll obviously conducted before last night's revelations.

    But even so, shows an incredibly strong position for Johnson....

    ‘Incredibly’ is indeed borne out by the numbers....

    47% Johnson can be trusted
    40% Johnson cannot be trusted

    52% Hunt can be trusted
    31% Hunt cannot be trusted
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491
    IanB2 said:
    At this rate GE1997 is going to look like a cakewalk.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    JackW said:

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    And the Conservatives won't move the writ at the best time for their party?

    Pleazzzzzzzzzzzze !!!!
    I think there are a number of non-Party reasons why the by-election should not be held in July or August.

    I don't like Chis Davies, and I am not a Tory.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,478

    Foxy said:

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    Well, duh, obviously!

    All parties try to get dates for by elections to suit them.

    Though a GE win may well be fair compensation for not having a by election.

    Party before constituents.

    It may be inconvenient because of the Royal Welsh. Party before constituents.

    It may be a low turn-out because of Summer vacation. Party before constituents.

    It may be unnecessary because we are heading towards a GE. Party before constituents.
    While I have some sympathy with 1 & 2, 3 is by no means a given.
    On 2, of course September is also a bad time because elderly people (like myself) take holidays then because it's cheaper, and there are fewer crowds.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    edited June 2019
    Foxy said:

    A question:

    It is perfectly legal for second home owners to be on the electoral register at both homes as can vote in local elections at both. In a GE they are only allowed to vote in one place, but presumably can vote in this byelection. Is this correct, and how many second homes are their in this delightful and accessible part of Wales?

    It isn’t “perfectly legal” to register more than once purely by dint of owning a second property. You have to be spending a significant amount of time there such that it is genuinely a second home, not a holiday home. There is detailed guidance on the electoral commission website.

    Anyone who genuinely has a second home and is registered there can vote in the by election.

    According to the Welsh Assembly 4.5% of properties within B&R are vacant and 2.2% classified as second or holiday homes.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176
    edited June 2019
    Jonathan said:

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Does impact his choice of chancellor? Neighbors matter. He’ll want someone hard of hearing in no11.
    In the early 2000s, there was a series on ITV called Neighbours from Hell. Rory Bremner did a parody of it with Gordon Brown explaining how his life was a misery because of the couple next door (with Tony and Cherie rowing in the background).

    She’s a lawyer. I think he works abroad.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,653
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,355
    edited June 2019

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    It may do.

    Johnson's appeal to the faithful rests largely on his supposed appeal amongst the electorate at large. As HYUFD never stops telling us, the Tories poll better when the question is 'how would you vote if Boris were leader?' If the general public turns off the idea of Boris as PM, whether because of little incidents like last night's or for other reasons, there may be some associated backing off by Party members.

    I don't think this contest is quite over yet.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    edited June 2019

    MikeL said:

    Was this posted last night? From quick scan couldn't see it.

    Sunday Times YouGov poll of Con members:

    Johnson 74
    Hunt 26

    (On 16 May 2019 it was Johnson 67 Hunt 33)

    80% certain of choice
    19% might change mind

    47% Johnson can be trusted
    40% Johnson cannot be trusted

    52% Hunt can be trusted
    31% Hunt cannot be trusted

    71% Happy if Johnson leader
    19% Unhappy

    41% Happy if Hunt leader
    31% Unhappy

    65% support pact with Brexit Party
    27% oppose
    8% Don't Know

    This may prove to be the most important news last night for the result of the Conservative leadership contest. Don’t overlook it.
    From these results, it looks like Hunt needs to go large on trust, and (as a corollary) the inconsistencies of Boris's pronouncements on almost any subject. Trouble is there is an element of politicians in glass houses.

    Hunt's real problem though (well, aside from the fact most members have already decided) is that he cannot win simply by being a pale shadow of Boris, because people will vote for the real thing, and so far that seems to be what he is aiming at.
  • swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,464
    whatever the shenanigans I cant see how the Tories hold it if BXP stand........not only are welsh farmers quite vocal about non-deal, NF is still smarting after coming behind Labour, he'll be desperate to see Tories into third.....(not that i think that will happen)
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    These stories are essentially a last warning for the Tories.

    They’ve had great fun mocking Labour for its choice of leader these last few years. Now we’ll see if they are any more sensible themselves.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,478
    Surely a car with multiple parking tickets on it should be towed to the pound?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    Surely a car with multiple parking tickets on it should be towed to the pound?
    Normally only done if it is untaxed or if it is causing an obstruction
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Alistair said:

    JackW said:

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    And the Conservatives won't move the writ at the best time for their party?

    Pleazzzzzzzzzzzze !!!!
    What is best for the Tory party is best for the country.
    If any Conservative seriously believe that Boris is best for the country then they need to remove themselves to the nearest medical facility for assessment under the Mental Health Act.

    I wish them well for a speedy recovery from their shocking and debilitating illness.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    It may do.

    Johnson's appeal to the faithful rests largely on his supposed appeal amongst the electorate at large. As HYUFD never stops telling us, the Tories poll better when the question is 'how would you vote if Boris were leader?' If the general public turns off the idea of Boris as PM, whether because of little incidents like last night's or for other reasons, there may be some associated backing off by Party members.

    I don't think this contest is quite over yet.
    It depends on whether Hunt gets some dirt thrown at him.. or more to the point ..how much./..
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    IanB2 said:

    Foxy said:

    A question:

    It is perfectly legal for second home owners to be on the electoral register at both homes as can vote in local elections at both. In a GE they are only allowed to vote in one place, but presumably can vote in this byelection. Is this correct, and how many second homes are their in this delightful and accessible part of Wales?

    It isn’t “perfectly legal” to register more than once purely by dint of owning a second property. You have to be spending a significant amount of time there such that it is genuinely a second home, not a holiday home. There is detailed guidance on the electoral commission website.

    Anyone who genuinely has a second home and is registered there can vote in the by election.

    According to the Welsh Assembly 4.5% of properties within B&R are vacant and 2.2% classified as second or holiday homes.
    Thanks, yes an owner has to spend significant time there, but may well be there in July/August in particular. Not a big factor, but an interesting one.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172

    Foxy said:

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    Well, duh, obviously!

    All parties try to get dates for by elections to suit them.

    Though a GE win may well be fair compensation for not having a by election.

    Party before constituents.

    It may be inconvenient because of the Royal Welsh. Party before constituents.

    It may be a low turn-out because of Summer vacation. Party before constituents.

    It may be unnecessary because we are heading towards a GE. Party before constituents.
    While I have some sympathy with 1 & 2, 3 is by no means a given.
    On 2, of course September is also a bad time because elderly people (like myself) take holidays then because it's cheaper, and there are fewer crowds.
    3 is by no means a given. But, it may be a given by August, which all argues for a modest wait.

    I can see an advantage of an early byelection too.

    The poor constituents of Brecon and Radnorshire will be spared the relentless campaign mode of thrusting LibDems all Summer !

    The bar charts, the leaflets, the London accents shrieking about Brexit, strident Jane Dodds ranting about windfarms, elderly peers from Harpenden babbling nonsense ... it is unbearable for the poor constituents of B&R, month after month after month.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    edited June 2019
    Foxy said:

    IanB2 said:

    Foxy said:

    A question:

    It is perfectly legal for second home owners to be on the electoral register at both homes as can vote in local elections at both. In a GE they are only allowed to vote in one place, but presumably can vote in this byelection. Is this correct, and how many second homes are their in this delightful and accessible part of Wales?

    It isn’t “perfectly legal” to register more than once purely by dint of owning a second property. You have to be spending a significant amount of time there such that it is genuinely a second home, not a holiday home. There is detailed guidance on the electoral commission website.

    Anyone who genuinely has a second home and is registered there can vote in the by election.

    According to the Welsh Assembly 4.5% of properties within B&R are vacant and 2.2% classified as second or holiday homes.
    Thanks, yes an owner has to spend significant time there, but may well be there in July/August in particular. Not a big factor, but an interesting one.
    In the old days you’d say it favours the Tories (LDs in the SW believe the Tories ship in second home votes from the Home Counties). Nowadays, who can say. People who travel a lot between multiple homes might be educated remainers. Or they could be leavers itching to vote for Farage. Who can say? I doubt 2% second home ownership is going to make much difference.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Looking like another huge mistake by Con MPs electing Boris and Hunt to the final two.

    3rd time lucky ?
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    edited June 2019
    IanB2 said:



    It isn’t “perfectly legal” to register more than once purely by dint of owning a second property. You have to be spending a significant amount of time there such that it is genuinely a second home, not a holiday home. There is detailed guidance on the electoral commission website.

    Anyone who genuinely has a second home and is registered there can vote in the by election.

    According to the Welsh Assembly 4.5% of properties within B&R are vacant and 2.2% classified as second or holiday homes.

    Those figures are very untrustworthy.

    Basically, they rely on second homers and holiday homers to self-declare to Powys Council. I would guess the number is out by a factor of 3 or 4.

    You are of course correct that you have to spend significant amount of time at the home (50 per cent or more) to be eligible to vote.

    For example, it is in fact illegal to send a message about Green issues in Cumbria by voting in a second home there, if you actually live in Camden.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    Foxy said:

    tpfkar said:

    July 25th is the Royal Welsh show in Builth Wells, so really not a good time for a by election. Transport issues and venues for polling and counting both compromised.

    The Lib Dems are into full campaign mode already so will be compromised if the by election is delayed as described here. So I reckon they will move the writ and dare the Tories to vote it down in a week or so.

    Typical LibDem hypocrisy. The LibDem campaign will be "compromised". We must have the byelection at the best time for the party.
    Well, duh, obviously!

    All parties try to get dates for by elections to suit them.

    Though a GE win may well be fair compensation for not having a by election.

    Party before constituents.

    It may be inconvenient because of the Royal Welsh. Party before constituents.

    It may be a low turn-out because of Summer vacation. Party before constituents.

    It may be unnecessary because we are heading towards a GE. Party before constituents.
    While I have some sympathy with 1 & 2, 3 is by no means a given.
    On 2, of course September is also a bad time because elderly people (like myself) take holidays then because it's cheaper, and there are fewer crowds.
    3 is by no means a given. But, it may be a given by August, which all argues for a modest wait.

    I can see an advantage of an early byelection too.

    The poor constituents of Brecon and Radnorshire will be spared the relentless campaign mode of thrusting LibDems all Summer !

    The bar charts, the leaflets, the London accents shrieking about Brexit, strident Jane Dodds ranting about windfarms, elderly peers from Harpenden babbling nonsense ... it is unbearable for the poor constituents of B&R, month after month after month.
    I don’t think the LibDems will let the Tories drag it out and force the constituency to go unrepresented for months. At a time of national crisis there are strong representational arguments for having the vacancy filled asap.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,261

    Surely a car with multiple parking tickets on it should be towed to the pound?
    Surely you can park illegally if you're prepared to pay the fine? I know people who take such an approach, generally where enforcement is a bit lax.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,217
    Jonathan said:

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Does impact his choice of chancellor? Neighbors matter. He’ll want someone hard of hearing in no11.
    Liz Truss seems an obvious choice for #11 based off the sum total of recent err events.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    edited June 2019

    Surely a car with multiple parking tickets on it should be towed to the pound?
    Surely you can park illegally if you're prepared to pay the fine? I know people who take such an approach, generally where enforcement is a bit lax.
    It is an offence so, not really. But it carries a fixed penalty so it’s a question of whether you are prepared to carry the cost (you could offer the same argument for a petty thief willing to spend occasional short spells inside as an occupational hazard - it doesn’t justify the offence).

    If it’s on double yellows eventually it should be towed away. But my guess is he’s just flouting a resident permit scheme. Motivated clued up traffic wardens should simply visit that area very regularly.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,677
    Scott_P said:
    The descent of Mercer's star has been impressively rapid. He's gone from the standard bearer of the next generation and future leader to us not really knowing if he's resigned the whip or not and manning the far side of Boris' media glory hole.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,491

    Surely a car with multiple parking tickets on it should be towed to the pound?
    And, ultimately, you'll get called to the magistrates court.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    TGOHF said:
    Backing him at 1.18 for next Tory leader and laying him at 1.24 for next PM could be a clever combination, with relatively little financial risk since he isn’t going to become the latter without becoming the former.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    IanB2 said:



    It isn’t “perfectly legal” to register more than once purely by dint of owning a second property. You have to be spending a significant amount of time there such that it is genuinely a second home, not a holiday home. There is detailed guidance on the electoral commission website.

    Anyone who genuinely has a second home and is registered there can vote in the by election.

    According to the Welsh Assembly 4.5% of properties within B&R are vacant and 2.2% classified as second or holiday homes.

    Those figures are very untrustworthy.

    Basically, they rely on second homers and holiday homers to self-declare to Powys Council. I would guess the number is out by a factor of 3 or 4.

    You are of course correct that you have to spend significant amount of time at the home (50 per cent or more) to be eligible to vote.

    For example, it is in fact illegal to send a message about Green issues in Cumbria by voting in a second home there, if you actually live in Camden.
    You are right that some second home owners don’t declare. They do however risk being turned in if they upset the locals.

    There is nothing about 50% in the guidance; it simply needs to be demonstrably a home where you spend a significant proportion of your time.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    Surely a car with multiple parking tickets on it should be towed to the pound?
    And, ultimately, you'll get called to the magistrates court.
    For regularly parking in a permit zone without a permit? I doubt it. In practice, almost certainly not, and I am not convinced about the theory.
  • eristdooferistdoof Posts: 5,065

    IanB2 said:

    Carrie has about a fortnight to spill the truth about the real Johnson, and set herself up with the proceeds of her story. Even that being a possibility ought to influence the betting.

    I don’t see how this Johnson story will harm support for him among his electorate.

    Question is, is he spending the weekend with her? If he is, then clearly they've 'kissed and made up'. Or something like it.
    If he isn't ..........

    Kissing and making up is part and parcel of countless abusive relationships. But I just don’t see how this story harms Johnson. He is to Tory members what Corbyn is to Labour ones. There is literally nothing he can say or do that will harm his standing. Any negative story about him is dismissed as being driven by an agenda. The one difference between the pair is that Johnson is also backed by his party’s MPs.

    Each story like this looses the candidate some support. One story on it's own is not going to change the outcome unless it is extreme. But 3 different types of mini-scandal can have an effect greater than the sum of their parts and easily swing the electorate.

  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    BoZo is due at a live hustings today with media access, so we will see what spin they have come up with
  • GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191

    Surely a car with multiple parking tickets on it should be towed to the pound?
    And, ultimately, you'll get called to the magistrates court.
    Parking was decriminalised years ago.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,806
    Mr. B2, the thing that confounds me is the sheer idiocy of MPs.

    They know Boris is incompetent. They know he's keener to play hide and seek than keep a promise.

    So what if the polls look good now? There isn't an election tomorrow. There'll be an election after the next PM has had months or years in office.

    Hunt might not get anyone's heart beating faster, but he seems like a fundamentally decent human being and was Health Secretary for a long time, itself a feat of survival. And we can directly contrast his pretty sensible time in the Foreign Office to Boris'.

    I'm not saying Hunt will win, mind. I'm just saying MPs were cretins to back Boris and then to allow themselves to be his glove puppets.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Dura_Ace said:

    Scott_P said:
    The descent of Mercer's star has been impressively rapid. He's gone from the standard bearer of the next generation and future leader to us not really knowing if he's resigned the whip or not and manning the far side of Boris' media glory hole.
    The other major disappointment was Hancock - what can HE have been thinking (apart from 'gizza job')?
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,856
    IMO it is ludicrous that governments can prevent a writ being moved for a by election. There has to be some sort of maximum time limit.

    Southam - I'm not so sure. Johnson hasn't been properly tested on this sort of thing and part of his appeal has always been he reaches voters other Tories don't. We'll just have to see if the reality is as depressing as you suggest.
  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    What's this meme about Mercer resigning the whip? Isn't he clearly a Tory MP since he's Boris' bodyguard?
  • glwglw Posts: 9,912
    IanB2 said:

    These stories are essentially a last warning for the Tories.

    They’ve had great fun mocking Labour for its choice of leader these last few years. Now we’ll see if they are any more sensible themselves.

    If the Tories had learnt any lessons then Boris wouldn't even have made the cut from the first round.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    Mr. B2, the thing that confounds me is the sheer idiocy of MPs.

    They know Boris is incompetent. They know he's keener to play hide and seek than keep a promise.

    So what if the polls look good now? There isn't an election tomorrow. There'll be an election after the next PM has had months or years in office.

    Hunt might not get anyone's heart beating faster, but he seems like a fundamentally decent human being and was Health Secretary for a long time, itself a feat of survival. And we can directly contrast his pretty sensible time in the Foreign Office to Boris'.

    I'm not saying Hunt will win, mind. I'm just saying MPs were cretins to back Boris and then to allow themselves to be his glove puppets.

    All true. The MPs are of course in a desperate panic about losing their seats, and the members are blinded by their quest to find a true believer. The irony is that they have settled upon a man who believes in nothing (as he himself confessed during one of his early journalist jobs).
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869
    Freggles said:

    What's this meme about Mercer resigning the whip? Isn't he clearly a Tory MP since he's Boris' bodyguard?

    I believe he rejoined based on assurances of some action on the soldier issue.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733
    IanB2 said:

    Foxy said:

    IanB2 said:

    Foxy said:

    A question:

    It is perfectly legal for second home owners to be on the electoral register at both homes as can vote in local elections at both. In a GE they are only allowed to vote in one place, but presumably can vote in this byelection. Is this correct, and how many second homes are their in this delightful and accessible part of Wales?

    It isn’t “perfectly legal” to register more than once purely by dint of owning a second property. You have to be spending a significant amount of time there such that it is genuinely a second home, not a holiday home. There is detailed guidance on the electoral commission website.

    Anyone who genuinely has a second home and is registered there can vote in the by election.

    According to the Welsh Assembly 4.5% of properties within B&R are vacant and 2.2% classified as second or holiday homes.
    Thanks, yes an owner has to spend significant time there, but may well be there in July/August in particular. Not a big factor, but an interesting one.
    In the old days you’d say it favours the Tories (LDs in the SW believe the Tories ship in second home votes from the Home Counties). Nowadays, who can say. People who travel a lot between multiple homes might be educated remainers. Or they could be leavers itching to vote for Farage. Who can say? I doubt 2% second home ownership is going to make much difference.
    I suspect more likely to be older Leave inclined voters from the West Midlands.

    I do reckon that second home ownership will become more frequent post Brexit, as fewer people will buy in the Costas, and more will holiday in the UK.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    IanB2 said:

    TGOHF said:
    Backing him at 1.18 for next Tory leader and laying him at 1.24 for next PM could be a clever combination, with relatively little financial risk since he isn’t going to become the latter without becoming the former.
    I’ve been doing that for weeks.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733

    Mr. B2, the thing that confounds me is the sheer idiocy of MPs.

    They know Boris is incompetent. They know he's keener to play hide and seek than keep a promise.

    So what if the polls look good now? There isn't an election tomorrow. There'll be an election after the next PM has had months or years in office.

    Hunt might not get anyone's heart beating faster, but he seems like a fundamentally decent human being and was Health Secretary for a long time, itself a feat of survival. And we can directly contrast his pretty sensible time in the Foreign Office to Boris'.

    I'm not saying Hunt will win, mind. I'm just saying MPs were cretins to back Boris and then to allow themselves to be his glove puppets.

    Hunt has been good at the FCO, and apart from the pyrrhic victory over junior doctors contracts (a new one is already about to go to a BMA vote) was far from the worst Health Secretary of my career. That booby prize goes to Patricia Hewitt.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,534
    The MOST interesting finding in that poll of Tory members is that 65% want a pact with the BXP. Wow, just wow. Purely electorally, they are quite mad - it would finish them off as a national party.

    Reading Parris's article (urging Hunt to go personal against Boris), an odd problem for Labour against Boris will be that Corbyn doesn't do personal attacks. Not ever, not even in private. It's not high-mindedness exactly, just that he regards them as a tiresome distraction from the serious business of politics, in the same way that he doesn't bother with attacking Southern Rail when he could be talking about the rail industry as a whole. Leaders don't need to be nasty, but Labour will need a Prescott prominent in the campaign to go fully-fledged personal - possibly Angela Rayner.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,806
    Mr. B2, if I were desperate to save my seat I wouldn't be genuflecting before a known incompetent. The Conservatives may be about to make the most obviously stupid mistake since Antiochus III decided to put elephants in between tightly knit foot soldier formations at the Battle of Magnesia.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:



    It isn’t “perfectly legal” to register more than once purely by dint of owning a second property. You have to be spending a significant amount of time there such that it is genuinely a second home, not a holiday home. There is detailed guidance on the electoral commission website.

    Anyone who genuinely has a second home and is registered there can vote in the by election.

    According to the Welsh Assembly 4.5% of properties within B&R are vacant and 2.2% classified as second or holiday homes.

    Those figures are very untrustworthy.

    Basically, they rely on second homers and holiday homers to self-declare to Powys Council. I would guess the number is out by a factor of 3 or 4.

    You are of course correct that you have to spend significant amount of time at the home (50 per cent or more) to be eligible to vote.

    For example, it is in fact illegal to send a message about Green issues in Cumbria by voting in a second home there, if you actually live in Camden.
    You are right that some second home owners don’t declare. They do however risk being turned in if they upset the locals.

    There is nothing about 50% in the guidance; it simply needs to be demonstrably a home where you spend a significant proportion of your time.
    10 per cent of the population now own a second property.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/18/one-ten-british-adults-now-second-home-owner/

    In B&R, you can visit some villages in the winter in mid evening, and in excess of 50 per cent of homes are all dark. Houes after houses after houses, all clearly not in use.

    I would guess that on average in B&R, second homers are at least 20 per cent -- and in some picturesque spots even more -- of all the properties.

    It is ripe for LibDem vote-harvesting, as Foxy's cunning LibDem mind is already illegally thinking.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,733

    The MOST interesting finding in that poll of Tory members is that 65% want a pact with the BXP. Wow, just wow. Purely electorally, they are quite mad - it would finish them off as a national party.

    Reading Parris's article (urging Hunt to go personal against Boris), an odd problem for Labour against Boris will be that Corbyn doesn't do personal attacks. Not ever, not even in private. It's not high-mindedness exactly, just that he regards them as a tiresome distraction from the serious business of politics, in the same way that he doesn't bother with attacking Southern Rail when he could be talking about the rail industry as a whole. Leaders don't need to be nasty, but Labour will need a Prescott prominent in the campaign to go fully-fledged personal - possibly Angela Rayner.

    Jess Phillips would be good at it too, but the Corbynites seem to hate her.
  • nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    IanB2 said:

    Surely a car with multiple parking tickets on it should be towed to the pound?
    And, ultimately, you'll get called to the magistrates court.
    For regularly parking in a permit zone without a permit? I doubt it. In practice, almost certainly not, and I am not convinced about the theory.
    If you don’t pay your fines then it becomes a different issue.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    edited June 2019
    Allison Pearson thinks the Johnson's neighbour should be 'named and shamed'.

    I think the Telegraph might be looking for a new columnist!
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,869

    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:



    It isn’t “perfectly legal” to register more than once purely by dint of owning a second property. You have to be spending a significant amount of time there such that it is genuinely a second home, not a holiday home. There is detailed guidance on the electoral commission website.

    Anyone who genuinely has a second home and is registered there can vote in the by election.

    According to the Welsh Assembly 4.5% of properties within B&R are vacant and 2.2% classified as second or holiday homes.

    Those figures are very untrustworthy.

    Basically, they rely on second homers and holiday homers to self-declare to Powys Council. I would guess the number is out by a factor of 3 or 4.

    You are of course correct that you have to spend significant amount of time at the home (50 per cent or more) to be eligible to vote.

    For example, it is in fact illegal to send a message about Green issues in Cumbria by voting in a second home there, if you actually live in Camden.
    You are right that some second home owners don’t declare. They do however risk being turned in if they upset the locals.

    There is nothing about 50% in the guidance; it simply needs to be demonstrably a home where you spend a significant proportion of your time.
    10 per cent of the population now own a second property.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/18/one-ten-british-adults-now-second-home-owner/

    In B&R, you can visit some villages in the winter in mid evening, and in excess of 50 per cent of homes are all dark. Houes after houses after houses, all clearly not in use.

    I would guess that on average in B&R, second homers are at least 20 per cent -- and in some picturesque spots even more -- of all the properties.

    It is ripe for LibDem vote-harvesting, as Foxy's cunning LibDem mind is already illegally thinking.
    More the Tories way of working.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,005
    Roger said:

    Alison Pearson thinks the Johnson's neighbour should be 'named and shamed'.

    I think the Telegraph might be looking for a new columnist!

    I think the debased parody of a newspaper that the Telegraph has become has exactly the columnist they deserve.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172

    The MOST interesting finding in that poll of Tory members is that 65% want a pact with the BXP. Wow, just wow. Purely electorally, they are quite mad - it would finish them off as a national party.

    Reading Parris's article (urging Hunt to go personal against Boris), an odd problem for Labour against Boris will be that Corbyn doesn't do personal attacks. Not ever, not even in private. It's not high-mindedness exactly, just that he regards them as a tiresome distraction from the serious business of politics, in the same way that he doesn't bother with attacking Southern Rail when he could be talking about the rail industry as a whole. Leaders don't need to be nasty, but Labour will need a Prescott prominent in the campaign to go fully-fledged personal - possibly Angela Rayner.

    I do like that about Corby, he doesn't do personal.

    Still, with three marriages, there is ample evidence that Corby may not be the easiest of husbands himself.
This discussion has been closed.