Good to see Jon Snow getting slapped down by Geoffrey Cox. There's far too many leaked sources these days which in all honesty are probably wishful thinking from so called journalists. I wouldn't be surprised if Jon Snow's contact in the legal world is actually Jessica Simor!
Good to see Jon Snow getting slapped down by Geoffrey Cox. There's far too many leaked sources these days which in all honesty are probably wishful thinking from so called journalists. I wouldn't be surprised if Jon Snow's contact in the legal world is actually Jessica Simor!
So PBers. If you were in the HoC tonight, would you vote for or against the deal?
On balance, and just about: For. And I would have been Against previously.
My mind hasn’t been changed by TMay’s addition of lipstick, on the pig, but by Richard Nabavi explaining to me that the pig isn’t all that bad, and besides, pig is all we’re going to get, and if we don’t accept the pig, we might get nothing and the country would possibly descend into rapine and despair.
So I am modestly in favour. Though no thanks to TMay who couldn’t sell a Christmas amnesty to turkeys.
Could I have some vegetarian pig-substitute, please?
And in answer to Jonathan, I guess I would vote for the deal.
Actually looking at the photo if one were being unkind one might suggest he is trying to make himself look more like his brother in the hope people confuse the two and vote for him by mistake.
FPT I would vote for the deal but then I would have voted for it before.
I don't see the changes being that material in the real world. I don't think that the EU will want to hold us within the backstop without even a promise to chip into the pot indefinitely. It is not the way that they do business. I don't think we can be held to the backstop if we choose not to be although I do accept that there are consequences for unilateral withdrawal.
The real game here is what at least the first version of our actual deal with the EU will look like. If we are trapped into the backstop short of walking away we are pretty much committed to a very soft Brexit indeed, probably involving continued membership of the CU. If we have a credible means of withdrawing from the backstop then the parameters of that discussion are wider. Whether we choose to take advantage of those wider parameters will of course be up to us and the EU in negotiations. We will start with a slightly more level playing field and the ERG should recognise that, even if the slope still inevitably favours the bigger player.
The absolute priority for our political class today and every day for the last 6 months should be to end the uncertainty and risk of a cliff edge departure which we have not prepared for. The deal does that, or at least buys a period of time in transition to sort things out. Given where we are MPs will be in serious dereliction of their duties if they don't vote this through.
The size of May’s win tonight. With DUP, Mogg, Davis, and Rabb, boles and the permanently startled owl in lobby with her as now looking likely, then she wins by more than 40 surely? (The longer these people don’t say what they will do the more likely they back may)
The other interesting one is if May gains more labour MPs in lobby with her than Tory MPs in lobby with Corbyn and Abbott. May’s win is 50 or more as looking likely as today progresses isn’t just about Tory MPs. 30 or 40 labour MPs wishing to either avoid second ref or just stop playing brexit chicken will ensure she wins by over 50. What was made clear to all of us in winter months, Corbyns whips office have zero control over Labour MPs in the meaningful votes.
which is just evidence of her desire to spend years moaning about the EU not actually leaving - like many leave nutters she is scared of losing her right to blame the EU for everything wrong and would actually rather stay.
Trouble is people (ERGers) have become so entrenched that they will be blind to any actual concession as the volte face required would be too much for them.
The tension! Everything coming down to one man's interpretation of the Joint Interpretative Instrument. A rum business indeed but comfort can at least be taken that that one man is Sir William Cash. We are in safe hands.
On the business for the day, I hope MPs will take after Michael Collins rather than Eamonn de Valera.
Of course Collins was killed shortly after but de Valera was in power in one form or another for most of the next 50 years - finall retiring as Irish President at the age of 90. He of course repudiated much of the 'deal' Collins agreed as Ireland progressed to being a Republic and left the Commonwealth - albeit it was his Fine Gael opponents who took the final steps.
Collins as with JFK is revered as he died young so never really had his reputation ruined by the realities of running a newly independent nation.
This is crazy. What do brexiteers objecting to the deal at this point think they will be getting instead? A few may genuinely think this deal is worse than remaining, and sure some may secretly want to thwart brexit for the betrayal narrative benefits, but someone like Andrea Jenkyns doesn't seem that machivellian.
If the deal is voted down today it will be those who are anti brexit who will be celebrating.
Trouble is people (ERGers) have become so entrenched that they will be blind to any actual concession as the volte face required would be too much for them.
They are stuck. As therefore are we.
Not really. If they do ensure May's deal doesn't pass, we will move on to Norway Plus, a referendum or Remain. That's why I just cannot see them voting against. They would be entirely mad to reject the deal. I know some of them are, but not enough - surely! Here's hoping, though ;-)
You look at Johnny Marr these days, and then Mozza, you would have thought there was 20 years age difference. Maybe that's what supporting UKIP does to you.
FPT I would vote for the deal but then I would have voted for it before.
I don't see the changes being that material in the real world. I don't think that the EU will want to hold us within the backstop without even a promise to chip into the pot indefinitely. It is not the way that they do business. I don't think we can be held to the backstop if we choose not to be although I do accept that there are consequences for unilateral withdrawal.
The real game here is what at least the first version of our actual deal with the EU will look like. If we are trapped into the backstop short of walking away we are pretty much committed to a very soft Brexit indeed, probably involving continued membership of the CU. If we have a credible means of withdrawing from the backstop then the parameters of that discussion are wider. Whether we choose to take advantage of those wider parameters will of course be up to us and the EU in negotiations. We will start with a slightly more level playing field and the ERG should recognise that, even if the slope still inevitably favours the bigger player.
The absolute priority for our political class today and every day for the last 6 months should be to end the uncertainty and risk of a cliff edge departure which we have not prepared for. The deal does that, or at least buys a period of time in transition to sort things out. Given where we are MPs will be in serious dereliction of their duties if they don't vote this through.
The Anarchist Teen in me would love to see just what happens in No Deal. It's that morbid fascination of "How bad can it be?" that provoked some folks to vote for Trump.
But I want a Brexit without the risk of disaster attaching to it, so I'd vote for May's Shit Deal. Then boot our May and anyone associated with the negotiations of May's Shit Deal - including all those who refused to plan for No Deal.
Then get real ornery on the trade deal negotiations, whilst planning for WTO in 2021.
Trouble is people (ERGers) have become so entrenched that they will be blind to any actual concession as the volte face required would be too much for them.
They are stuck. As therefore are we.
Not really. If they do ensure May's deal doesn't pass, we will move on to Norway Plus, a referendum or Remain. That's why I just cannot see them voting against. They would be entirely mad to reject the deal. I know some of them are, but not enough - surely! Here's hoping, though ;-)
To be honest given the number of times I’ve seen Peston and Kuenssberg tweeting utter rubbish in the past few months I’m pretty much zoning out of anything they write at the moment.
Trouble is people (ERGers) have become so entrenched that they will be blind to any actual concession as the volte face required would be too much for them.
They are stuck. As therefore are we.
Not really. If they do ensure May's deal doesn't pass, we will move on to Norway Plus, a referendum or Remain. That's why I just cannot see them voting against. They would be entirely mad to reject the deal. I know some of them are, but not enough - surely! Here's hoping, though ;-)
I think you will get your wish. TMay’s deal will fall tonight. Probably. In extremis, parliament will vote for an extension, and a referendum, or Norway +.
Game theory suggests we will crash out, but in the end - surely - MPs will realize this is not a game.
All you need is Gove All you need is Gove All you need is Gove, Gove Gove is all you need
Gove is a shoe in for Strictly this year with the amount of pin head dancing he was doing on R4 this morning.
Meanwhile the going at Cheltenham is blustery but we haven't had the rain that has been threatened. Yet.
Must be on the way. Down in Devon, just had a truly horrible walk with the dog - lashed by horizontal rain. The dog took an abnormally long time out in it before he would finally take a dump.
I think there is a Brexit metaphor in there somewhere.....
All you need is Gove All you need is Gove All you need is Gove, Gove Gove is all you need
Gove is a shoe in for Strictly this year with the amount of pin head dancing he was doing on R4 this morning.
Meanwhile the going at Cheltenham is blustery but we haven't had the rain that has been threatened. Yet.
I am sure the Labour Party would happily have Gove or Boris, with a preference for the latter as the comparison makes Corbyn look slightly less ridiculous.
On the business for the day, I hope MPs will take after Michael Collins rather than Eamonn de Valera.
Of course Collins was killed shortly after but de Valera was in power in one form or another for most of the next 50 years - finall retiring as Irish President at the age of 90. He of course repudiated much of the 'deal' Collins agreed as Ireland progressed to being a Republic and left the Commonwealth - albeit it was his Fine Gael opponents who took the final steps.
Collins as with JFK is revered as he died young so never really had his reputation ruined by the realities of running a newly independent nation.
Dev actually broke with abstentionist[1] Sinn Fein in 1926, entering constitutional politics with his Fianna Fail party.
[1] Back then, SF even refused to recognise the Dail.
If the Erggers and Duppers defeat this deal, it would be the greatest act of political self sabotage since May's snap election. Brexit won't get better than this offer. May has been appeasing the brexiteers the whole way through it would be madness to throw it all away now. So they probably will.
All you need is Gove All you need is Gove All you need is Gove, Gove Gove is all you need
Gove is a shoe in for Strictly this year with the amount of pin head dancing he was doing on R4 this morning.
Meanwhile the going at Cheltenham is blustery but we haven't had the rain that has been threatened. Yet.
Must be on the way. Down in Devon, just had a truly horrible walk with the dog - lashed by horizontal rain. The dog took an abnormally long time out in it before he would finally take a dump.
I think there is a Brexit metaphor in there somewhere.....
Trouble is people (ERGers) have become so entrenched that they will be blind to any actual concession as the volte face required would be too much for them.
They are stuck. As therefore are we.
Not really. If they do ensure May's deal doesn't pass, we will move on to Norway Plus, a referendum or Remain. That's why I just cannot see them voting against. They would be entirely mad to reject the deal. I know some of them are, but not enough - surely! Here's hoping, though ;-)
I think you will get your wish. TMay’s deal will fall tonight. Probably. In extremis, parliament will vote for an extension, and a referendum, or Norway +.
Game theory suggests we will crash out, but in the end - surely - MPs will realize this is not a game.
My guess is that a lot of MPs who have been loyal to May and cannot countenance No Deal will feel that if the ERG votes the deal down again they are released of all previous obligations. May sat next to Junker last night when he said that this is the final offer. She said she passionately believed in it. It's this or nothing for Brexiteers. They surely have to realise this. Surely.
You look at Johnny Marr these days, and then Mozza, you would have thought there was 20 years age difference. Maybe that's what supporting UKIP does to you.
If the Erggers and Duppers defeat this deal, it would be the greatest act of political self sabotage since May's snap election. Brexit won't get better than this offer. May has been appeasing the brexiteers the whole way through it would be madness to throw it all away now. So they probably will.
The problem with extremists is that they are always greedy and unwilling to compromise. It is why they are so dangerous.
Wasn't DAG being punted as a remoaner last night? He very obviously doesn't have the necessary movable principles or the self deceiving ability to spin on the tiniest coin of 'unilateral declaration' to become an honorable member.
Wasn't DAG being punted as a remoaner last night? He very obviously doesn't have the necessary movable principles or the self deceiving ability to spin on the tiniest coin of 'unilateral declaration' to become an honorable member.
Quite a difference between a 24 hour delay and a 21 month delay though! I would feel I was being bounced if I was an MP - will another day make much difference to properly consider legal arguments on such an important decision that will affect us for possibly decades.
FPT I would vote for the deal but then I would have voted for it before.
I don't see the changes being that material in the real world. I don't think that the EU will want to hold us within the backstop without even a promise to chip into the pot indefinitely. It is not the way that they do business. I don't think we can be held to the backstop if we choose not to be although I do accept that there are consequences for unilateral withdrawal.
The real game here is what at least the first version of our actual deal with the EU will look like. If we are trapped into the backstop short of walking away we are pretty much committed to a very soft Brexit indeed, probably involving continued membership of the CU. If we have a credible means of withdrawing from the backstop then the parameters of that discussion are wider. Whether we choose to take advantage of those wider parameters will of course be up to us and the EU in negotiations. We will start with a slightly more level playing field and the ERG should recognise that, even if the slope still inevitably favours the bigger player.
The absolute priority for our political class today and every day for the last 6 months should be to end the uncertainty and risk of a cliff edge departure which we have not prepared for. The deal does that, or at least buys a period of time in transition to sort things out. Given where we are MPs will be in serious dereliction of their duties if they don't vote this through.
The Anarchist Teen in me would love to see just what happens in No Deal. It's that morbid fascination of "How bad can it be?" that provoked some folks to vote for Trump.
But I want a Brexit without the risk of disaster attaching to it, so I'd vote for May's Shit Deal. Then boot our May and anyone associated with the negotiations of May's Shit Deal - including all those who refused to plan for No Deal.
Then get real ornery on the trade deal negotiations, whilst planning for WTO in 2021.
I've said repeatedly that no deal would not be nearly as calamitous as many have claimed, not least because we have agreed a series of mini-deals with the EU which would apply re flights, trucks, etc. But it would undoubtedly make our ongoing relationship with the EU much more difficult so we should take this deal.
Anecdote alert: I attended the AGM of our local Conservative branch recently. It's fair to say that this is not exactly the social or political highlight of the season, being mostly concerned with reappointing officers unopposed, approving the branch accounts, and hearing from our local councillors on what is happening in the district and county council (spoiler: they are short of dosh, especially the county council).
However, one thing was interesting. Although there was almost no discussion of national politics, no less than three people went out of their way, quite separately and without any real relevance to the subjects being discussed, to express what I can only describe as contempt for Boris. These were not lily-livered Cameroons, either, but traditional shire Tories who probably all voted Leave. No-one spoke favourably of Boris, or expressed disapproval of any other possible contenders.
Make of this what you will: my view is that support for Boris is much less than the media and the markets think, and (perhaps more importantly) the Anyone But Boris viewpoint is very widely shared not only amongst MPs, but also in the membership.
Wasn't DAG being punted as a remoaner last night? He very obviously doesn't have the necessary movable principles or the self deceiving ability to spin on the tiniest coin of 'unilateral declaration' to become an honorable member.
He’s a total Remoaner who pretends to be a Leaver who is merely “interested in the legal issues”. It’s utter horseshit, he is desperate to see Brexit reversed; for some reason he is unable to admit it, but all his tweets - especially the unguarded late-night ones - underline this.
That doesn’t make his opinions worthless, however. He is often acute, and prescient.
Trouble is people (ERGers) have become so entrenched that they will be blind to any actual concession as the volte face required would be too much for them.
They are stuck. As therefore are we.
Not really. If they do ensure May's deal doesn't pass, we will move on to Norway Plus, a referendum or Remain. That's why I just cannot see them voting against. They would be entirely mad to reject the deal. I know some of them are, but not enough - surely! Here's hoping, though ;-)
I think you will get your wish. TMay’s deal will fall tonight. Probably. In extremis, parliament will vote for an extension, and a referendum, or Norway +.
Game theory suggests we will crash out, but in the end - surely - MPs will realize this is not a game.
My guess is that a lot of MPs who have been loyal to May and cannot countenance No Deal will feel that if the ERG votes the deal down again they are released of all previous obligations. May sat next to Junker last night when he said that this is the final offer. She said she passionately believed in it. It's this or nothing for Brexiteers. They surely have to realise this. Surely.
Comments
And in answer to Jonathan, I guess I would vote for the deal.
- Boris, July 2003.
- Boris, June 2004.
All you need is Gove
All you need is Gove
All you need is Gove, Gove
Gove is all you need
Boris don't hurt me
Don't hurt me
No more
On the business for the day, I hope MPs will take after Michael Collins rather than Eamonn de Valera.
Meanwhile the going at Cheltenham is blustery but we haven't had the rain that has been threatened. Yet.
After 12 years the passion has waned a little, but SNP & electorate still conjoining with dogged consistency.
https://twitter.com/GerryHassan/status/1105397308856909825
I just cannot see Johnson as PM - unless he turns out like Hal in Henry V pt 1 and 2
I think he’ll chicken out, again.
I would vote for the deal but then I would have voted for it before.
I don't see the changes being that material in the real world. I don't think that the EU will want to hold us within the backstop without even a promise to chip into the pot indefinitely. It is not the way that they do business. I don't think we can be held to the backstop if we choose not to be although I do accept that there are consequences for unilateral withdrawal.
The real game here is what at least the first version of our actual deal with the EU will look like. If we are trapped into the backstop short of walking away we are pretty much committed to a very soft Brexit indeed, probably involving continued membership of the CU. If we have a credible means of withdrawing from the backstop then the parameters of that discussion are wider. Whether we choose to take advantage of those wider parameters will of course be up to us and the EU in negotiations. We will start with a slightly more level playing field and the ERG should recognise that, even if the slope still inevitably favours the bigger player.
The absolute priority for our political class today and every day for the last 6 months should be to end the uncertainty and risk of a cliff edge departure which we have not prepared for. The deal does that, or at least buys a period of time in transition to sort things out. Given where we are MPs will be in serious dereliction of their duties if they don't vote this through.
The size of May’s win tonight. With DUP, Mogg, Davis, and Rabb, boles and the permanently startled owl in lobby with her as now looking likely, then she wins by more than 40 surely? (The longer these people don’t say what they will do the more likely they back may)
The other interesting one is if May gains more labour MPs in lobby with her than Tory MPs in lobby with Corbyn and Abbott. May’s win is 50 or more as looking likely as today progresses isn’t just about Tory MPs. 30 or 40 labour MPs wishing to either avoid second ref or just stop playing brexit chicken will ensure she wins by over 50. What was made clear to all of us in winter months, Corbyns whips office have zero control over Labour MPs in the meaningful votes.
They are stuck. As therefore are we.
https://twitter.com/notDcfcBoss/status/1105246947961651201
Collins as with JFK is revered as he died young so never really had his reputation ruined by the realities of running a newly independent nation.
"Australia becomes latest country to suspend Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft"
https://news.sky.com/story/boeing-to-issue-software-update-to-make-737-max-safer-11662753
They're still flying in this country, with TUI Group.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47519929
If the deal is voted down today it will be those who are anti brexit who will be celebrating.
Is she that stupid? Did she really not confer with him first?
But I want a Brexit without the risk of disaster attaching to it, so I'd vote for May's Shit Deal. Then boot our May and anyone associated with the negotiations of May's Shit Deal - including all those who refused to plan for No Deal.
Then get real ornery on the trade deal negotiations, whilst planning for WTO in 2021.
Game theory suggests we will crash out, but in the end - surely - MPs will realize this is not a game.
I think there is a Brexit metaphor in there somewhere.....
[1] Back then, SF even refused to recognise the Dail.
Raining heavily now.
He very obviously doesn't have the necessary movable principles or the self deceiving ability to spin on the tiniest coin of 'unilateral declaration' to become an honorable member.
https://twitter.com/davidallengreen/status/1105391205381218305
However, one thing was interesting. Although there was almost no discussion of national politics, no less than three people went out of their way, quite separately and without any real relevance to the subjects being discussed, to express what I can only describe as contempt for Boris. These were not lily-livered Cameroons, either, but traditional shire Tories who probably all voted Leave. No-one spoke favourably of Boris, or expressed disapproval of any other possible contenders.
Make of this what you will: my view is that support for Boris is much less than the media and the markets think, and (perhaps more importantly) the Anyone But Boris viewpoint is very widely shared not only amongst MPs, but also in the membership.
https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/433599-trump-raises-hopes-for-permanent-daylight-savings-time
That doesn’t make his opinions worthless, however. He is often acute, and prescient.
https://twitter.com/NickBoles/status/1105387147446636545?s=20
Leadership race by weekend.