politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Richard Ojeda – my 250/1 longshot to take on the draft-dodging incumbent
Yesterday one of the midterm contenders who received a lot of publicity during the campaign, Richard Ojeda, announced that he was running for the presidency and published his first campaign video, see above.
Rather than throw money at every Democrat longshot, perhaps we should revisit whether Trump will run again, given speculation around why he missed several engagements and that he may already have been subpoenaed by Mueller.
Rather than throw money at every Democrat longshot, perhaps we should revisit whether Trump will run again, given speculation around why he missed several engagements and that he may already have been subpoenaed by Mueller.
Rather than throw money at every Democrat longshot, perhaps we should revisit whether Trump will run again, given speculation around why he missed several engagements and that he may already have been subpoenaed by Mueller.
Mike Pence is 33/1 2020 presidential election winner with Unibet, and he will be the incumbent if Trump does resign before then. Better odds than betting on Trump's exit date (although admittedly not quite the same thing).
Again Ojeda actually needs to get elected to Congress or a governorship before running for President
Trump didn't
Ojeda is no Donald Trump.....
Yep Donald Trump had 15+ years of carefully managed public awareness - Ojeda (and in fact probably no one except Oprah has that). Plus Trump played the role of a decision maker on TV - even Oprah doesn't have the public awareness for "getting things done".
So bar Trump I can't see anyone else able to take the same path to the White House..
Mike Pence is 33/1 2020 presidential election winner with Unibet, and he will be the incumbent if Trump does resign before then. Better odds than betting on Trump's exit date (although admittedly not quite the same thing).
It's highly correlated. I think Pence would win any primary if Trump was unable to run given how right wing the GOP base is right now (Kasich and Hayley look like poor bets for POTUS to me)
Yep Donald Trump had 15+ years of carefully managed public awareness - Ojeda (and in fact probably no one except Oprah has that). Plus Trump played the role of a decision maker on TV - even Oprah doesn't have the public awareness for "getting things done".
So bar Trump I can't see anyone else able to take the same path to the White House..
Just as Trump ran a campaign that nobody could predict, I expect the campaign against Trump will be like no other before
In that case there is no telling who the best candidate might be
Fox might be a protest about the doxing of Tucker Carlson. Not sure about the rest.
The official Twitter account for Fox News has not tweeted since Thursday, reportedly in protest of the social media company's lack of responsiveness regarding content associated with a protest outside of host Tucker Carlson's home.
Yep Donald Trump had 15+ years of carefully managed public awareness - Ojeda (and in fact probably no one except Oprah has that). Plus Trump played the role of a decision maker on TV - even Oprah doesn't have the public awareness for "getting things done".
So bar Trump I can't see anyone else able to take the same path to the White House..
Just as Trump ran a campaign that nobody could predict, I expect the campaign against Trump will be like no other before
In that case there is no telling who the best candidate might be
The mid-terms didn't help in telling us who that best candidate might be either.
So do I but I feel with so many tours in Iraq and Afghanistan he will, at the very least, been close to some shady shit which could be used against him.
Yep Donald Trump had 15+ years of carefully managed public awareness - Ojeda (and in fact probably no one except Oprah has that). Plus Trump played the role of a decision maker on TV - even Oprah doesn't have the public awareness for "getting things done".
So bar Trump I can't see anyone else able to take the same path to the White House..
Just as Trump ran a campaign that nobody could predict, I expect the campaign against Trump will be like no other before
In that case there is no telling who the best candidate might be
She might be a bit too old now but I think Judith Scheindlin would be a good wildcard candidate and could beat him.
I like bets like this, especially in contests with wide open fields, as the Democrat nomination is. It doesn't matter if you pick a few donkeys if one or two catch fire. The profits you can make by laying the successes off at good prices later on should more than compensate for the blushes of backing a palooka.
That said, Mr Ojeda spends far too much time in the gym to have enough time to study policy positions in any depth.
I don't know. I'm spending about three hours a day walking at the moment (and more if I'm out and about on a long walk), and I'm almost always listening to podcasts - mainly science and current affairs. I pick up lots of stuff that way.
Going to the gym doesn't mean you need to turn off your mind (though sadly for many, it does).
Again Ojeda actually needs to get elected to Congress or a governorship before running for President
Trump didn't
Ojeda is no Donald Trump.....
Yep Donald Trump had 15+ years of carefully managed public awareness - Ojeda (and in fact probably no one except Oprah has that). Plus Trump played the role of a decision maker on TV - even Oprah doesn't have the public awareness for "getting things done".
So bar Trump I can't see anyone else able to take the same path to the White House..
The other point is that however credible a candidate against Trump we might consider someone, they first have to get through the Democratic primaries.
Unless they already have significant fundraising and/or name awareness, there is very little time for them to establish themselves - and a losing Congressional candidate doesn't have much of a platform (and O'Rourke has already sucked up much of the oxygen available to such candidates... and funds).
Mike's is a very good bet. Personally, I'm rubbish at trading bets and a lot better at predicting outcomes, however, it's pretty obvious that if he is running then his odds should come in. He's also clearly different to the Hillary-Biden-Warren-Sanders septugenarian retreads (I know these four do speak to very different parts of the Democrat spectrum but they're still all DC veterans).
I think there's a big gap for someone new and optimistic to break into. Is Ojeda the one to do it? Lack of experience is nothing like the bar it once was and he has to have a better chance than his odds suggest.
Mike Pence is 33/1 2020 presidential election winner with Unibet, and he will be the incumbent if Trump does resign before then. Better odds than betting on Trump's exit date (although admittedly not quite the same thing).
You *assume* he will be the incumbent. We didn't get President Agnew (not that I'm suggesting anything about Pence's tax returns, just that there are no certainties).
Rather than throw money at every Democrat longshot, perhaps we should revisit whether Trump will run again, given speculation around why he missed several engagements and that he may already have been subpoenaed by Mueller.
250/1 for a guy who is actually running is value.
Surely that depends. There will be value here but sometimes even if someone is running they are less than a 0.4% chance still. Though after 2016 I'd hesitate to say who that applies to.
What does this even mean? Revenue per employee or something? How can that be improved? Is this a symptom of UK businesses aversion to capital investment as opposed to simply hiring more people?
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
"The perjury trap" - yeah, really unfair to catch you out lying to the FBI, using your own words...
It's hard to tell just where this is going to go right now. Trump's appointment of Whitaker is clearly unconstitutional, and quite possibly further evidence of obstruction. Obviously intended to stop the Mueller investigation, it could have prompted precipitate action by him.
That said, it has seen so much pushback, and not only from Democrats, that it looks as though Trump might try to appoint someone else quite quickly (Christie is reportedly being considered)... so Mueller might not rush to indict until he is ready.
Mike Pence is 33/1 2020 presidential election winner with Unibet, and he will be the incumbent if Trump does resign before then. Better odds than betting on Trump's exit date (although admittedly not quite the same thing).
You *assume* he will be the incumbent. We didn't get President Agnew (not that I'm suggesting anything about Pence's tax returns, just that there are no certainties).
Ssh! I'm still hoovering up all the 10,000/1 Ivanka.
Mike Pence is 33/1 2020 presidential election winner with Unibet, and he will be the incumbent if Trump does resign before then. Better odds than betting on Trump's exit date (although admittedly not quite the same thing).
You *assume* he will be the incumbent. We didn't get President Agnew (not that I'm suggesting anything about Pence's tax returns, just that there are no certainties).
And he has the broad electoral appeal of the bucket of warm spit that the post of Vice President is often compared to.
I think the Democrats are in a strong position for 2020.
a) the demographics are slowly moving in their direction b) 2016 was extremely close c) there are more economic downside surprises than upside surprises by 2020 d) Democrats know who their opponent is going to be - Trump (or just possibly Pence) e) Democrats have a range of able candidates covering the spectrum to choose from
The Democrats are at 1.83 to win the 2020 election. That has to be good value. It should be nearer 1.5 in my opinion.
What does this even mean? Revenue per employee or something? How can that be improved? Is this a symptom of UK businesses aversion to capital investment as opposed to simply hiring more people?
It doesn't matter, Scott thinks its bad new so he retweets it
I think the Democrats are in a strong position for 2020.
a) the demographics are slowly moving in their direction b) 2016 was extremely close c) there are more economic downside surprises than upside surprises by 2020 d) Democrats know who their opponent is going to be - Trump (or just possibly Pence) e) Democrats have a range of able candidates covering the spectrum to choose from
The Democrats are at 1.83 to win the 2020 election. That has to be good value. It should be nearer 1.5 in my opinion.
Good spot, I think this is correct - of course one might say the midterms don't matter but I don't think the shear weight of democratic vote can be ignored in the rust belt this time round.
What does this even mean? Revenue per employee or something? How can that be improved? Is this a symptom of UK businesses aversion to capital investment as opposed to simply hiring more people?
It doesn't matter, Scott thinks its bad new so he retweets it
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
I'm looking forward to him donning a suit of armour, assembling a band of like-minded souls, and marching on Westminster.
His main leadership campaign slogan will be "I wouldn't have done it like that".
I think the Democrats are in a strong position for 2020.
a) the demographics are slowly moving in their direction b) 2016 was extremely close c) there are more economic downside surprises than upside surprises by 2020 d) Democrats know who their opponent is going to be - Trump (or just possibly Pence) e) Democrats have a range of able candidates covering the spectrum to choose from
The Democrats are at 1.83 to win the 2020 election. That has to be good value. It should be nearer 1.5 in my opinion.
I think the Democrats are in a strong position for 2020.
a) the demographics are slowly moving in their direction b) 2016 was extremely close c) there are more economic downside surprises than upside surprises by 2020 d) Democrats know who their opponent is going to be - Trump (or just possibly Pence) e) Democrats have a range of able candidates covering the spectrum to choose from
The Democrats are at 1.83 to win the 2020 election. That has to be good value. It should be nearer 1.5 in my opinion.
"The perjury trap" - yeah, really unfair to catch you out lying to the FBI, using your own words...
It's hard to tell just where this is going to go right now. Trump's appointment of Whitaker is clearly unconstitutional, and quite possibly further evidence of obstruction. Obviously intended to stop the Mueller investigation, it could have prompted precipitate action by him.
That said, it has seen so much pushback, and not only from Democrats, that it looks as though Trump might try to appoint someone else quite quickly (Christie is reportedly being considered)... so Mueller might not rush to indict until he is ready.
Who wins if the Electoral college is a tie (AZ, WI, MI all flip) ?
Trumpton. Would command a majority of state delegations in the House. (Most states wins not most votes). In practice, one elector could do the decent thing and be faithless, and change his vote to that of the national popular vote. Which would be much fairer.
"The perjury trap" - yeah, really unfair to catch you out lying to the FBI, using your own words...
It's hard to tell just where this is going to go right now. Trump's appointment of Whitaker is clearly unconstitutional, and quite possibly further evidence of obstruction. Obviously intended to stop the Mueller investigation, it could have prompted precipitate action by him.
That said, it has seen so much pushback, and not only from Democrats, that it looks as though Trump might try to appoint someone else quite quickly (Christie is reportedly being considered)... so Mueller might not rush to indict until he is ready.
Lock him up I say.
Mueller is awesome
He is. He also has a stellar team of specialist prosecutors.
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
I'm looking forward to him donning a suit of armour, assembling a band of like-minded souls, and marching on Westminster.
His main leadership campaign slogan will be "I wouldn't have done it like that".
I bet if you got him in private he would all be in favour of Single Market. He was always pro immigraton.
I think the Democrats are in a strong position for 2020.
a) the demographics are slowly moving in their direction b) 2016 was extremely close c) there are more economic downside surprises than upside surprises by 2020 d) Democrats know who their opponent is going to be - Trump (or just possibly Pence) e) Democrats have a range of able candidates covering the spectrum to choose from
The Democrats are at 1.83 to win the 2020 election. That has to be good value. It should be nearer 1.5 in my opinion.
f) Healthcare (should probably be a) )
Agreed. Very good point.
I'm mentally pricing 15-8/8-15 for the generic odds when considering presidential picks.
Who wins if the Electoral college is a tie (AZ, WI, MI all flip) ?
Trumpton. Would command a majority of state delegations in the House. (Most states wins not most votes). In practice, one elector could do the decent thing and be faithless, and change his vote to that of the national popular vote. Which would be much fairer.
Why would it be fairer? America is a federation not a unitary state.
I think the Democrats are in a strong position for 2020.
a) the demographics are slowly moving in their direction b) 2016 was extremely close c) there are more economic downside surprises than upside surprises by 2020 d) Democrats know who their opponent is going to be - Trump (or just possibly Pence) e) Democrats have a range of able candidates covering the spectrum to choose from
The Democrats are at 1.83 to win the 2020 election. That has to be good value. It should be nearer 1.5 in my opinion.
f) Healthcare (should probably be a) )
Agreed. Very good point.
I'm mentally pricing 15-8/8-15 for the generic odds when considering presidential picks.
I think I'll stick to last time's strategy of betting on nominations.
However a Dem contest is way less profitable than the GOP
Mr. NorthWales, in 2010 Balls very nearly lost to a different Conservative candidate. A notional majority of 10,000 (boundaries changed) fell to about 1,000 or so. During the 2015 campaign, Balls spent some time campaigning in other seats, and the decline of UKIP may also have helped Jenkyns.
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
Curious. Boris is just as scathing about Theresa as George Osborne ever was, yet Boris gets a free pass - no accusations of bitterness and disloyalty against him. Why is that? At least George had some reason to be rankled after his ignominious sacking.
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
I'm looking forward to him donning a suit of armour, assembling a band of like-minded souls, and marching on Westminster.
His main leadership campaign slogan will be "I wouldn't have done it like that".
I bet if you got him in private he would all be in favour of Single Market. He was always pro immigraton.
Boris may in favour of the single market, but not being in the single market without being in the EU. Latterly I think Boris Johnson has a lot more integrity than Michael Gove, who is the real guilty man of Brexit.
Who wins if the Electoral college is a tie (AZ, WI, MI all flip) ?
vote of the House
By state though so the GOP still win.
Are the state degelations required to vote per the presidential vote or the congressional one?
I believe they are meant to vote the way their state went for but there is scope for faithless electors.
However I think things like if one candidate won the popular vote comfortably there might be momentum to do the right thing or if the congressional gerrymander has distorted the result.
What does this even mean? Revenue per employee or something? How can that be improved? Is this a symptom of UK businesses aversion to capital investment as opposed to simply hiring more people?
It doesn't matter, Scott thinks its bad new so he retweets it
"The perjury trap" - yeah, really unfair to catch you out lying to the FBI, using your own words...
It's hard to tell just where this is going to go right now. Trump's appointment of Whitaker is clearly unconstitutional, and quite possibly further evidence of obstruction. Obviously intended to stop the Mueller investigation, it could have prompted precipitate action by him.
That said, it has seen so much pushback, and not only from Democrats, that it looks as though Trump might try to appoint someone else quite quickly (Christie is reportedly being considered)... so Mueller might not rush to indict until he is ready.
Who wins if the Electoral college is a tie (AZ, WI, MI all flip) ?
vote of the House
By state though so the GOP still win.
There is also the miniscule chance of a faithless elector determining the whole thing. And wouldn't that be controversial!
Unlikely but if we have learnt anything in recent years it is that the unlikely can happen.
2016 Electoral college votes:
Colin Powell 3 (WA), John Kasich 1 (TX), Ron Paul 1 (TX), Bernie Sanders 1 (HI), Faith Spotted Eagle 1 (WA)
Faithless electors are more likely when the result is a foregone conclusion so the elector is safe to do so. The pressure not to be faithless in a tied situation would be immense.
I think the Democrats are in a strong position for 2020.
a) the demographics are slowly moving in their direction b) 2016 was extremely close c) there are more economic downside surprises than upside surprises by 2020 d) Democrats know who their opponent is going to be - Trump (or just possibly Pence) e) Democrats have a range of able candidates covering the spectrum to choose from
The Democrats are at 1.83 to win the 2020 election. That has to be good value. It should be nearer 1.5 in my opinion.
f) Healthcare (should probably be a) )
Agreed. Very good point.
I'm mentally pricing 15-8/8-15 for the generic odds when considering presidential picks.
I think that is the same as 1.5 for the Democrats in Betfair speak.
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
Curious. Boris is just as scathing about Theresa as George Osborne ever was, yet Boris gets a free pass - no accusations of bitterness and disloyalty against him. Why is that? At least George had some reason to be rankled after his ignominious sacking.
Everyone knows that Boris is primarily interested in advancing his own career.
Who wins if the Electoral college is a tie (AZ, WI, MI all flip) ?
Trumpton. Would command a majority of state delegations in the House. (Most states wins not most votes). In practice, one elector could do the decent thing and be faithless, and change his vote to that of the national popular vote. Which would be much fairer.
Why would it be fairer? America is a federation not a unitary state.
Pedant Hat On: America is a collection of countries.
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
I'm looking forward to him donning a suit of armour, assembling a band of like-minded souls, and marching on Westminster.
His main leadership campaign slogan will be "I wouldn't have done it like that".
I bet if you got him in private he would all be in favour of Single Market. He was always pro immigraton.
Boris may in favour of the single market, but not being in the single market without being in the EU. Latterly I think Boris Johnson has a lot more integrity than Michael Gove, who is the real guilty man of Brexit.
Er sorry?! Is that a different Boris from the one who switched from remain to leave in 2016 because he thought it would boost his leadership chances?
Who wins if the Electoral college is a tie (AZ, WI, MI all flip) ?
vote of the House
By state though so the GOP still win.
Is it the lame duck or incoming Congress that votes? Because the Democrats stand a reasonable chance of taking the Senate in 2020 so that could matter for Veep.
What does this even mean? Revenue per employee or something? How can that be improved? Is this a symptom of UK businesses aversion to capital investment as opposed to simply hiring more people?
It doesn't matter, Scott thinks its bad new so he retweets it
Who wins if the Electoral college is a tie (AZ, WI, MI all flip) ?
vote of the House
By state though so the GOP still win.
Is it the lame duck or incoming Congress that votes? Because the Democrats stand a reasonable chance of taking the Senate in 2020 so that could matter for Veep.
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
I'm looking forward to him donning a suit of armour, assembling a band of like-minded souls, and marching on Westminster.
His main leadership campaign slogan will be "I wouldn't have done it like that".
I bet if you got him in private he would all be in favour of Single Market. He was always pro immigraton.
Boris may in favour of the single market, but not being in the single market without being in the EU. Latterly I think Boris Johnson has a lot more integrity than Michael Gove, who is the real guilty man of Brexit.
If Boris has given up on becoming PM, I think he may agree with his brother that it is better to remain and call for a second referendum. That would be a game changer.
If Tezza brokers a deal that keeps us in the CU and offers stability and certainty for business and employees, nobody is going to be listening to sinister wreckers like Johnson and Rees anymore. And her polling will rapidly rise.
Listening to Andrea Jenkyns on Sky you just have to wonder how on earth she beat Ed Balls.
She is clueless
She won thanks to the campaigning skills of David Herdson and myself.
It is probably the worst thing I’ve done in my life.
That explains it.
Most MPs lack star quality, It's not that shes particularly bad or out of sync as been inarticulate and uninformed, its just she contrasted so bady with who she replaced.
If Tezza brokers a deal that keeps us in the CU and offers stability and certainty for business and employees, nobody is going to be listening to sinister wreckers like Johnson and Rees anymore. And her polling will rapidly rise.
Yes, I think that could well be right. Particularly if she can keep most of the cabinet on-board.
Who wins if the Electoral college is a tie (AZ, WI, MI all flip) ?
Trumpton. Would command a majority of state delegations in the House. (Most states wins not most votes). In practice, one elector could do the decent thing and be faithless, and change his vote to that of the national popular vote. Which would be much fairer.
Why would it be fairer? America is a federation not a unitary state.
It elects one president, so you could argue it would be fairer.
Comments
Like Ojeda?
Is it possible ? Yes, yes it is. I'm on.
So bar Trump I can't see anyone else able to take the same path to the White House..
In that case there is no telling who the best candidate might be
https://twitter.com/kazweida/status/1062100579835695104?s=21
Going to the gym doesn't mean you need to turn off your mind (though sadly for many, it does).
Unless they already have significant fundraising and/or name awareness, there is very little time for them to establish themselves - and a losing Congressional candidate doesn't have much of a platform (and O'Rourke has already sucked up much of the oxygen available to such candidates... and funds).
I don't think 250/1 is overly generous.
https://twitter.com/jackmatt81/status/1062286839200002049?s=21
I think there's a big gap for someone new and optimistic to break into. Is Ojeda the one to do it? Lack of experience is nothing like the bar it once was and he has to have a better chance than his odds suggest.
How can that be improved? Is this a symptom of UK businesses aversion to capital investment as opposed to simply hiring more people?
I agree with Boris that what we are seeing now is a staged drama before a deal is unveiled. The sucking of teeth makes me feel much more happy than a month ago when everyone was fervently telling us what good progress was being made.
It's hard to tell just where this is going to go right now. Trump's appointment of Whitaker is clearly unconstitutional, and quite possibly further evidence of obstruction. Obviously intended to stop the Mueller investigation, it could have prompted precipitate action by him.
That said, it has seen so much pushback, and not only from Democrats, that it looks as though Trump might try to appoint someone else quite quickly (Christie is reportedly being considered)... so Mueller might not rush to indict until he is ready.
a) the demographics are slowly moving in their direction
b) 2016 was extremely close
c) there are more economic downside surprises than upside surprises by 2020
d) Democrats know who their opponent is going to be - Trump (or just possibly Pence)
e) Democrats have a range of able candidates covering the spectrum to choose from
The Democrats are at 1.83 to win the 2020 election. That has to be good value. It should be nearer 1.5 in my opinion.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/12/us/kyrsten-sinema-arizona-senator.html
https://twitter.com/ONS/status/1062280559911714817
His main leadership campaign slogan will be "I wouldn't have done it like that".
There are still a number of Arizona state positions that are being hotly contested with more votes to be counted.
https://results.arizona.vote/#/featured/4/0
Mueller is awesome
https://www.oddschecker.com/politics/us-politics/us-presidential-election-2020/democrat-candidate
He also has a stellar team of specialist prosecutors.
She is clueless
Unlikely but if we have learnt anything in recent years it is that the unlikely can happen.
However a Dem contest is way less profitable than the GOP
Colin Powell 3 (WA), John Kasich 1 (TX), Ron Paul 1 (TX), Bernie Sanders 1 (HI), Faith Spotted Eagle 1 (WA)
However I think things like if one candidate won the popular vote comfortably there might be momentum to do the right thing or if the congressional gerrymander has distorted the result.
Words which give some positive or negative spin should be avoided by the ONS.
https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/180928-Miller-Response.pdf
It is probably the worst thing I’ve done in my life.
Yes agreed - that's very poor from the ONS, they should stick to the data.
Wasn't expecting much as the critic reviews have been pretty dismissive but in fact it was a great film - not flawless but a really enjoyable watch.
I recommend it to anyone who hasn't yet seen it - worth seeing on the big screen.