Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » A Nation once again? – Part 3 lessons from abroad

SystemSystem Posts: 12,173
edited October 2018 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » A Nation once again? – Part 3 lessons from abroad

There are numerous examples of states being put together in modern times.  The closest and probably most studied is Germany. It is almost at 30 years since the wall came down so there is quite a period to look at. The situation is also not that dissimilar to Ireland  – a larger more prosperous neighbour takes over its sizeable but smaller struggling neighbour.  How has Germany fared?

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    First, and thanks again, Alanbrooke!
  • RoyalBlueRoyalBlue Posts: 3,223
    Second. Thanks again @Alanbrooke - great stuff.
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787
    Agreed, excellent stuff. Although the gallant Field Marshall seems to be conceding that re-unification is coming.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    Overall unity has been a success for Germany, though the benefits have flowed largely to the west rather than the east. The east despite heavy investment has seen its towns empty, its young people move west and a consequent drop in population. While unity has worked for Germany arguably this is less so for the east.
    Any polling on how many people in the ex-GDR would like to de-reunify?
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Another great article - than you:

    Varadkar and Coveney have been disasters for Irish relations with the British communities.

    And Anglo-Irish relations in general. Revenge is a dish best served cold, and while long term Britain will want good relations with Ireland, the inevitable bumps in the road ahead will be bumpier than they need have been.

    Related to edmund's question - reunification is a process, not an event - and the young (who have no direct memory of the divided Germany) are further along the road than their elders:

    https://www.thelocal.de/20171109/how-united-is-germany-28-years-after-the-berlin-walls-fall
  • YellowSubmarineYellowSubmarine Posts: 2,740
    edited October 2018
    It's a terrific set of articles from @alanbrooke for which he deserves many thanks.

    The obvious missing issue is the currency question. Reunification means northerners joining the euro ( though a period of de facto sterlingisation along side it for a few years may ease transition ). On the one hand that kills stone dead the question that plagued YES in #indyref. Which currency would we use ? And there would be no costs associated with set up or central banks etc as they already exist.

    On the other hand the euro kills stone dead the YES campaigns big trick on currency. That you can vote for radical change without any change on something important.

    Northern Irish voters would be being asked to vote in favour of salaries, benefits and pensions currently paid in pounds to be paid in euros. That's quite a psychological barrier and makes any unity referendim campaign vulnerable to turbulence in the eurozone.
  • Another issue given the German comparison is how unity is achieved. The GDR was dissolved and acceded to the FRG as lander. This gave them immeadiate self goverment and devolution. Would the 6 counties really just assume the poeers of Irish local government and everything else being nationalised ? Even Sinn Fein has conceeded some sort of devolution might continue. And if the north had devolution then why not other bits of the Republic ? You could end up with something looking slightly Belgian.

    For instance it would be difficult to see how the " Irish, British or both " formulation of the GFA wouldn't continue in the north just with the default setting changing from British to Irish citizenship. Doubtless all sorts of safeguards would need to be built into any agreement including symbols, citizenship, the Crown etc before a final deal could be put to a vote on both sides of the border.

    Still it's a fascinating trio of articles from @alanbrooke which of course we wouldn't be discussing without the Brexit fiasco in general or I suspect the DUPs huge strategic error on Brexit in particular.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    Enjoyed the trilogy of articles, all good pieces.
  • In terms of predictions ( are there any markets on this ? ) I now believe we'll see a confederation on the island of Ireland in my lifetime with the UK government retaining signifigant guarantor rights for those who excercise their constitutional righs to be both Irish and British or simply British. As the Crown is 16 distinct legal personalities in the countries that share it should be possible for a Queen of Northern Ireland role with ceremonial functions - but not co head of state - to be fashioned that is tied to the British Crown. The Queen already holds different titles in the Isle of Man and Channel Islands for instance. But lessons will be learned from Brexit. The process will be slow, referendums wil be post legislative and nothing will be forced through on 51.8% of the vote.

    This is all speculation, an instinct, but based on my view Brexit is a fundamental rupture of the ancien regime that the British state won't easily recover from and that the DUP have made an historic strategic error.

    But there are many variables still in play. How soft/hard Brexit is is one. How the DUP respond to Westminster ramming Gay Marriage and Abortion reform down their throats as revenge for Brexit shenanigans is another. But for me it all has a handover of Hong Kong feel to it now - and the colonial reference isn't one I'd even have considered making before Brexit.
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708


    Related to edmund's question - reunification is a process, not an event - and the young (who have no direct memory of the divided Germany) are further along the road than their elders:

    https://www.thelocal.de/20171109/how-united-is-germany-28-years-after-the-berlin-walls-fall

    Thanks, that answers different questions but also interesting ones.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176
    Very good articles, thank you @Alanbrooke.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,237

    Overall unity has been a success for Germany, though the benefits have flowed largely to the west rather than the east. The east despite heavy investment has seen its towns empty, its young people move west and a consequent drop in population. While unity has worked for Germany arguably this is less so for the east.
    Any polling on how many people in the ex-GDR would like to de-reunify?

    Worth noting that Eastern German incomes and unemployment levels are better than EU averages now, so hard to agree that it has only benefited the West.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,537
    Yet another thoughtful and illuminating installment. I'm a total convert to Alanbrooke (having previously seen him as a bit terse and vaguely fed up with UK politics) and I'm eager to read more by him. I think his analysis of Germany is spot on, while the parallels to the USA and Italy are sobering new thoughts.

    Thank you.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,537
    edited October 2018
    rcs1000 said:

    Overall unity has been a success for Germany, though the benefits have flowed largely to the west rather than the east. The east despite heavy investment has seen its towns empty, its young people move west and a consequent drop in population. While unity has worked for Germany arguably this is less so for the east.
    Any polling on how many people in the ex-GDR would like to de-reunify?
    Worth noting that Eastern German incomes and unemployment levels are better than EU averages now, so hard to agree that it has only benefited the West.

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    edited October 2018
    rcs1000 said:

    Worth noting that Eastern German incomes and unemployment levels are better than EU averages now, so hard to agree that it has only benefited the West.

    I don't think Alanbrooke said that. He said it had been *of more benefit* to the West. Which it probably has, even after you take into account the money paid to the east and the loss of the national capital.

    Edit - who set up this epic blockquote shambles?
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,537
    Apols to rcs for messing up the blockquotes - the "Worth noting" sentence is from him.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,504
    Yes, agree; a splendid and thought-provoking series.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    As a very wise man once said, nothing is so responsible for the good ol' days as a bad memory.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    An interesting lead and some very pertinent observations from YS downthread. Given its size and all the issues, a significant change in governance within the republic is inevitable were unification likely to be on the table.

    Heart versus head issues are always immensely dangerous, as we shouldn't need telling by now.

  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    rcs1000 said:

    Overall unity has been a success for Germany, though the benefits have flowed largely to the west rather than the east. The east despite heavy investment has seen its towns empty, its young people move west and a consequent drop in population. While unity has worked for Germany arguably this is less so for the east.
    Any polling on how many people in the ex-GDR would like to de-reunify?
    Worth noting that Eastern German incomes and unemployment levels are better than EU averages now, so hard to agree that it has only benefited the West.
    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    thanks Nick

    for statistics freaks ( though all in German ) the German Finance |Ministry publishes a comprehensive annual revew of Unity and the issues around it.

    https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Neue-Laender/jahresbericht-zum-stand-der-deutschen-einheit-2018.html

    you can download it FOC
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    edited October 2018
    Can I thank Alanbrooke for an excellent series of articles which are a kind of first on PB. We have never done a 3 parter before.

    When I first read them I felt it important that they run sequentially dominating the site for a day or more. Good stuff.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    I remember when backpacking behind the iron curtain as a student, the item we got asked for all the time was western carrier bags. As well as having real utility in a land of handleless paper bags, it was clear they had cache as a visible sign of contact with the west. Sadly we were ignorant of this when we were packing, and I was always disappointed we hadn't taken any to share.

    Of course the west is now trying to rid our oceans of this great symbol of freedom.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    ydoethur said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Worth noting that Eastern German incomes and unemployment levels are better than EU averages now, so hard to agree that it has only benefited the West.

    I don't think Alanbrooke said that. He said it had been *of more benefit* to the West. Which it probably has, even after you take into account the money paid to the east and the loss of the national capital.

    Edit - who set up this epic blockquote shambles?
    yes that is indeed the case, however the political spin off is some easterners still feeeling they are second class citizens because the gap hasnt closed. Its similar to the resntment some of the UK nationalist parties use to drive their support.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,504
    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    edited October 2018



    rcs1000 said:

    Overall unity has been a success for Germany, though the benefits have flowed largely to the west rather than the east. The east despite heavy investment has seen its towns empty, its young people move west and a consequent drop in population. While unity has worked for Germany arguably this is less so for the east.
    Any polling on how many people in the ex-GDR would like to de-reunify?
    Worth noting that Eastern German incomes and unemployment levels are better than EU averages now, so hard to agree that it has only benefited the West.
    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/




    The Romanian figures are extraordinary. Ceausescu's Romania was the saddest place I have ever travelled.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    edited October 2018

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    IanB2 said:

    The Romanian figures are extraordinary. Ceausescu's Romania was the saddest place I have ever travelled.

    On a Soviet joke site (now sadly taken down) among all the puns, quips and Radio Yerevan jokes was a simple one-liner:

    'Nicolae Ceaucescu was knighted in 1979.'

    I assumed it was another joke.

    It wasn't.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,504
    edited October 2018
    IanB2 said:



    rcs1000 said:

    Overall unity has been a success for Germany, though the benefits have flowed largely to the west rather than the east. The east despite heavy investment has seen its towns empty, its young people move west and a consequent drop in population. While unity has worked for Germany arguably this is less so for the east.
    Any polling on how many people in the ex-GDR would like to de-reunify?
    Worth noting that Eastern German incomes and unemployment levels are better than EU averages now, so hard to agree that it has only benefited the West.
    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/


    The Romanian figures are extraordinary. Ceausescu's Romania was the saddest place I have ever travelled.

    It’s what happened in the Referendum isn’t it? “Life was better ‘once upon a time”, is a common position as Dr Ydoethur points out.

    In 10 years time there’ll be a great yearning for lots of things we had, or could do, when we were part of the EU and that’ll be the moment for us Remainers.

    Edit; don’t know why the block quote didn’t work. The comment about Romania came from IanB2.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506

    Can I thank Alanbrooke for an excellent series of articles which are a kind of first on PB. We have never done a 3 parter before.

    When I first read them I felt it important that they run sequentially dominating the site for a day or more. Good stuff.

    Seconded. They are superb.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,504
    edited October 2018
    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    Last week people are talking about taking my free TV licence, now it’s my vote!

    Can we keep ours; wife and I are staunch Remainers!
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,751
    Excellent series of articles - sorry I've not had time to comment on them.

    I think there is a 'not' missing from " Germans over all think unity has been a good thing, but they are without reservations on how it has played out."?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    Last week people are talking about taking my free TV, now it’s my vote!

    Can we keep ours; wife and I are staunch Remainers!
    It wasn't a serious suggestion! Nevertheless it is striking how difficult it is, as one gets older, not to judge everything through the prism of considerations and experiences that are really time-expired.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    It’s what happened in the Referendum isn’t it? “Life was better ‘once upon a time”, is a common position as Dr Ydoethur points out.

    In 10 years time there’ll be a great yearning for lots of things we had, or could do, when we were part of the EU and that’ll be the moment for us Remainers.

    Edit; don’t know why the block quote didn’t work. The comment about Romania came from IanB2.

    Because some daft bugger tried editing them and got the lines wrong. Would recommend everyone do a Morris Dancer and not quote for half an hour until it calms down,
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    edited October 2018
    ydoethur said:

    IanB2 said:

    The Romanian figures are extraordinary. Ceausescu's Romania was the saddest place I have ever travelled.

    On a Soviet joke site (now sadly taken down) among all the puns, quips and Radio Yerevan jokes was a simple one-liner:

    'Nicolae Ceaucescu was knighted in 1979.'

    I assumed it was another joke.

    It wasn't.
    His desire to put distance between himself and Moscow was for a time seen as a potential asset to the West. The fact that Romania's considerable production of fruit and vegetables was almost entirely exported such that the local population had almost none to eat didn't score highly on our evaluation.

    I will always remember the old woman in a remote carpathian farming village who went indoors and came out and offered us a crate of potatoes. At the time it seemed a bizarre experience and as already over-loaded backpackers we had to refuse. The priceless nature of what she was offering only really dawned on me later.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    If you want another comparison, the component parts of Poland still seem to vote along geographical lines set by its partition in the 18th century. Though, to be more optimistic, the key word in that sentence might be geographical. Italy remains an exceptionally diverse country because its geography practically dictates that: the Appennines carve the country up, as does its length. Sure, choices have cemented existing divisions but those choices don’t have to be made. Northern Ireland is not particularly geographically distinct from the rest of the island. Get Belfast right and the rest should follow.

    I have disagreed with very little in @Alanbrooke’s excellent series but I fear his own antipathy to the current Irish government stance on Brexit has led him astray: hardcore Leavers are far more upset with it than ordinary unionists. Indeed, such polling as there has been suggests that messing up Brexit is worse for the union.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,504
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    Last week people are talking about taking my free TV, now it’s my vote!

    Can we keep ours; wife and I are staunch Remainers!
    It wasn't a serious suggestion! Nevertheless it is striking how difficult it is, as one gets older, not to judge everything through the prism of considerations and experiences that are really time-expired.
    When one gets to the stage when it’s difficult to do some physical things is when nostalgia REALLY kicks in!
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892
    Excellent series.

    I think that the differences between the Protestant majority in NI and Eire are just too wide to bridge in the current generation and possibly even in the next. I completely agree with @Alanbrooke that the current leadership in Eire have driven this process backwards instead of forwards. It therefore seems to me that any unification is some way off.

    The problem NI has is that they increasingly don't fit into the UK either. I remember an incident on R5 some years ago now where there had been protests about the attempted integration of a school. This had involved adults turning up and, unbelievably, throwing stones at catholic children sent to attend the school. One of the mothers was interviewed on R5 live and explained that they were protecting their British heritage. The interviewer was incandescent. "How dare you suggest it is British to throw stones at school children, how dare you."

    It was good radio but it was also illustrative of a mutual incomprehension that I have often thought about. The Protestant community in NI feels under siege, tolerated at best by the mainland, their majority status increasingly under threat, their traditional abuse of the Catholic community no longer tolerated with consequential loss of public sector jobs etc, They remind me in many ways of the poor whites described in one of Bob Dylan's most brilliant songs, Only a Pawn in the Game, and like those poor whites of the south they have been used by their politicians in a most disgraceful way.

    What I think is increasingly clear is that the status quo is no longer viable. We need to bring NI into the current century, whether as part of the UK or Eire or even some form of compromise. We need to help rebuild their economy and their outlook on the world. It is not enough for them to dig in and survive as a threatened community increasingly dependent on subsidy. Many thanks once again to @Alanbrooke for his thought provoking series.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    Can I thank Alanbrooke for an excellent series of articles which are a kind of first on PB. We have never done a 3 parter before.

    When I first read them I felt it important that they run sequentially dominating the site for a day or more. Good stuff.

    thanks Mike. I would encourage other posters to give it a go and give a bit of a break to the PB editorial team whose unfailing efforts need more recognition.
  • OchEyeOchEye Posts: 1,469

    It's a terrific set of articles from @alanbrooke for which he deserves many thanks.

    The obvious missing issue is the currency question. Reunification means northerners joining the euro ( though a period of de facto sterlingisation along side it for a few years may ease transition ). On the one hand that kills stone dead the question that plagued YES in #indyref. Which currency would we use ? And there would be no costs associated with set up or central banks etc as they already exist.

    On the other hand the euro kills stone dead the YES campaigns big trick on currency. That you can vote for radical change without any change on something important.

    Northern Irish voters would be being asked to vote in favour of salaries, benefits and pensions currently paid in pounds to be paid in euros. That's quite a psychological barrier and makes any unity referendim campaign vulnerable to turbulence in the eurozone.

    As far as I can see, many people in Ireland on both sides of the border are quite happy in dealing with duel currencies, and not forgetting, most people in the North recognise the difficulty in using NI banknotes elsewhere in the UK. In reality, using a single currency rather than effectively triple might be preferable to many on all sides of the spectrum.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    Can I thank Alanbrooke for an excellent series of articles which are a kind of first on PB. We have never done a 3 parter before.

    When I first read them I felt it important that they run sequentially dominating the site for a day or more. Good stuff.

    thanks Mike. I would encourage other posters to give it a go and give a bit of a break to the PB editorial team whose unfailing efforts need more recognition.
    Maybe I should submit a review of The Last Jedi...
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    edited October 2018

    Excellent series of articles - sorry I've not had time to comment on them.

    I think there is a 'not' missing from " Germans over all think unity has been a good thing, but they are without reservations on how it has played out."?

    youre correct David, my eyes aren't what they were :-)
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,164
    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    Oh dear - the old should just f*** off and die eh?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    edited October 2018

    If you want another comparison, the component parts of Poland still seem to vote along geographical lines set by its partition in the 18th century. Though, to be more optimistic, the key word in that sentence might be geographical. Italy remains an exceptionally diverse country because its geography practically dictates that: the Appennines carve the country up, as does its length. Sure, choices have cemented existing divisions but those choices don’t have to be made. Northern Ireland is not particularly geographically distinct from the rest of the island. Get Belfast right and the rest should follow.

    I have disagreed with very little in @Alanbrooke’s excellent series but I fear his own antipathy to the current Irish government stance on Brexit has led him astray: hardcore Leavers are far more upset with it than ordinary unionists. Indeed, such polling as there has been suggests that messing up Brexit is worse for the union.

    By and large Ive tried to keep Brexit out of it. My reaction to Varadkar is not based on Brexit, but rather an innate concern as to why anyone would want to stir up the whole Northern Ireland swamp when it was starting to settle down.

    While Brexit is no way the fault of the irish government, to me the correct approach was to set a working party to one side from both governments and sort the border issue away from the headlines, Varadkar has made an issue of something he would have been best advised to leave alone. Its a personal view of course, but in playing the issue he is now bit by bit getting in to a fight with the Northern Neanderthals. SF are now telling him he cant back off, DUP he cant go forward. If he keeps going on like this theyll be in control of events not him.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Good morning, everyone.

    Another interesting article, Mr. Brooke.

    F1: bet didn't come off but the race was rather good. We shall shortly conduct a small experiment to see how much a slightly sleepy Yorkshireman can recall about a sporting event the previous evening.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,237

    It’s what happened in the Referendum isn’t it? “Life was better ‘once upon a time”, is a common position as Dr Ydoethur points out.

    In 10 years time there’ll be a great yearning for lots of things we had, or could do, when we were part of the EU and that’ll be the moment for us Remainers.

    Edit; don’t know why the block quote didn’t work. The comment about Romania came from IanB2.

    The true tragedy of Brexit is that we are creating ever more divisions in our society. Searching for an analogy, I can't help but think of Hartley Shawcross's terrible "we are the masters now" line.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    Obviously a patriotic Brexiteer who wants his Empire back!
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,745
    ydoethur said:

    Can I thank Alanbrooke for an excellent series of articles which are a kind of first on PB. We have never done a 3 parter before.

    When I first read them I felt it important that they run sequentially dominating the site for a day or more. Good stuff.

    thanks Mike. I would encourage other posters to give it a go and give a bit of a break to the PB editorial team whose unfailing efforts need more recognition.
    Maybe I should submit a review of The Last Jedi...
    Perhaps a comparison of The Last Jedi and Brexit, as an example of poor execution of a flawed plan...
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871

    Good morning, everyone.

    Another interesting article, Mr. Brooke.

    F1: bet didn't come off but the race was rather good. We shall shortly conduct a small experiment to see how much a slightly sleepy Yorkshireman can recall about a sporting event the previous evening.

    Is there any way we can lay your tips? ;)
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. 1000, somewhat true. It's also exposing divisions that others were entirely comfortably keeping quiet. As long as the chattering class prevailed, the views of disgruntled peasant folk were sources of amusement rather than concern, if they were considered at all.

    Mr. B2, on Bottas, that's fair enough. I'm still peeved by the Raikkonen pole bet. 0.07s off a straight 14 winner, 0.009s off an each way winner, and it was red.

    Honestly. I haven't been that miffed by a pole bet since Kubica failed to get it in Monaco by 0.002s.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,745

    If you want another comparison, the component parts of Poland still seem to vote along geographical lines set by its partition in the 18th century. Though, to be more optimistic, the key word in that sentence might be geographical. Italy remains an exceptionally diverse country because its geography practically dictates that: the Appennines carve the country up, as does its length. Sure, choices have cemented existing divisions but those choices don’t have to be made. Northern Ireland is not particularly geographically distinct from the rest of the island. Get Belfast right and the rest should follow.

    I have disagreed with very little in @Alanbrooke’s excellent series but I fear his own antipathy to the current Irish government stance on Brexit has led him astray: hardcore Leavers are far more upset with it than ordinary unionists. Indeed, such polling as there has been suggests that messing up Brexit is worse for the union.

    Isn't Western Poland (the former German part) populated mostly with Poles displaced from the areas now in Belarus, Lithuania and Ukraine following Soviet occupation of those areas? Do they vote like Eastern Poles or Western Poles?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    felix said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    Oh dear - the old should just f*** off and die eh?
    I had already said it wasn't a serious suggestion, downthread. The serious point is that we all form our political world view in our late teens and early 20s, and this can then be very enduring. As time passes this becomes a less and less reliable basis for objective assessment about contemporary questions.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    If you want another comparison, the component parts of Poland still seem to vote along geographical lines set by its partition in the 18th century. Though, to be more optimistic, the key word in that sentence might be geographical. Italy remains an exceptionally diverse country because its geography practically dictates that: the Appennines carve the country up, as does its length. Sure, choices have cemented existing divisions but those choices don’t have to be made. Northern Ireland is not particularly geographically distinct from the rest of the island. Get Belfast right and the rest should follow.

    I have disagreed with very little in @Alanbrooke’s excellent series but I fear his own antipathy to the current Irish government stance on Brexit has led him astray: hardcore Leavers are far more upset with it than ordinary unionists. Indeed, such polling as there has been suggests that messing up Brexit is worse for the union.

    My reaction to Varadkar is not based on Brexit, but rather an innate concern as to why anyone would want to stir up the whole Northern Ireland swamp when it was starting to settle down.

    While Brexit is no way the fault of the irish government, to me the correct approach was to set a working party to one side from both governments and sort the border issue away from the headlines, Varadkar has made an issue of something he would have been best advised to leave alone.
    Like how the British, Spanish & Gibraltarians have sorted out that other "show stopper" Gibraltar?

    http://chronicle.gi/2018/10/on-the-cusp-of-a-deal/
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    Great article thanks I will go back and read the others carefully.

    My weekend activities preventing me seeing some great stuff on PB.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,745
    Roger said:

    Obviously a patriotic Brexiteer who wants his Empire back!
    I believe that the passenger he objected to was Jamaican originally, so from the Empire.

  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,237

    Mr. 1000, somewhat true. It's also exposing divisions that others were entirely comfortably keeping quiet. As long as the chattering class prevailed, the views of disgruntled peasant folk were sources of amusement rather than concern, if they were considered at all.

    Mr. B2, on Bottas, that's fair enough. I'm still peeved by the Raikkonen pole bet. 0.07s off a straight 14 winner, 0.009s off an each way winner, and it was red.

    Honestly. I haven't been that miffed by a pole bet since Kubica failed to get it in Monaco by 0.002s.

    Oh I agree completely, and that's why I used the "we are the masters now" quote.

    Right now we have a government that is neither reaching out to the ERG or to those who voted Remain but believe we should respect the referendum. They have become utterly disconnected from those who elected them.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,871
    Foxy said:

    If you want another comparison, the component parts of Poland still seem to vote along geographical lines set by its partition in the 18th century. Though, to be more optimistic, the key word in that sentence might be geographical. Italy remains an exceptionally diverse country because its geography practically dictates that: the Appennines carve the country up, as does its length. Sure, choices have cemented existing divisions but those choices don’t have to be made. Northern Ireland is not particularly geographically distinct from the rest of the island. Get Belfast right and the rest should follow.

    I have disagreed with very little in @Alanbrooke’s excellent series but I fear his own antipathy to the current Irish government stance on Brexit has led him astray: hardcore Leavers are far more upset with it than ordinary unionists. Indeed, such polling as there has been suggests that messing up Brexit is worse for the union.

    Isn't Western Poland (the former German part) populated mostly with Poles displaced from the areas now in Belarus, Lithuania and Ukraine following Soviet occupation of those areas? Do they vote like Eastern Poles or Western Poles?
    Given the massive shifts in, and loss of, population during Poland's particularly tragic history, any geographical differences nowadays are far more likely to be due to geography itself (particularly economic geography) rather than some hangover from a 19th century event.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    edited October 2018
    rcs1000 said:

    It’s what happened in the Referendum isn’t it? “Life was better ‘once upon a time”, is a common position as Dr Ydoethur points out.

    In 10 years time there’ll be a great yearning for lots of things we had, or could do, when we were part of the EU and that’ll be the moment for us Remainers.

    Edit; don’t know why the block quote didn’t work. The comment about Romania came from IanB2.

    The true tragedy of Brexit is that we are creating ever more divisions in our society. Searching for an analogy, I can't help but think of Hartley Shawcross's terrible "we are the masters now" line.
    "The true tragedy of Brexit..."

    File under foreseeable consequences.

    From one who voted for it and now no longer lives in "our society".

    I hope you were being ironic Robert.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    If you want another comparison, the component parts of Poland still seem to vote along geographical lines set by its partition in the 18th century. Though, to be more optimistic, the key word in that sentence might be geographical. Italy remains an exceptionally diverse country because its geography practically dictates that: the Appennines carve the country up, as does its length. Sure, choices have cemented existing divisions but those choices don’t have to be made. Northern Ireland is not particularly geographically distinct from the rest of the island. Get Belfast right and the rest should follow.

    I have disagreed with very little in @Alanbrooke’s excellent series but I fear his own antipathy to the current Irish government stance on Brexit has led him astray: hardcore Leavers are far more upset with it than ordinary unionists. Indeed, such polling as there has been suggests that messing up Brexit is worse for the union.

    My reaction to Varadkar is not based on Brexit, but rather an innate concern as to why anyone would want to stir up the whole Northern Ireland swamp when it was starting to settle down.

    While Brexit is no way the fault of the irish government, to me the correct approach was to set a working party to one side from both governments and sort the border issue away from the headlines, Varadkar has made an issue of something he would have been best advised to leave alone.
    Like how the British, Spanish & Gibraltarians have sorted out that other "show stopper" Gibraltar?

    http://chronicle.gi/2018/10/on-the-cusp-of-a-deal/
    yes. There are some differences of course but watching Gibraltar versus NI there's quite a gap. In all truth I would have expected the spanish to be the more difficult to reach an agreement with.
  • OchEyeOchEye Posts: 1,469

    If you want another comparison, the component parts of Poland still seem to vote along geographical lines set by its partition in the 18th century. Though, to be more optimistic, the key word in that sentence might be geographical. Italy remains an exceptionally diverse country because its geography practically dictates that: the Appennines carve the country up, as does its length. Sure, choices have cemented existing divisions but those choices don’t have to be made. Northern Ireland is not particularly geographically distinct from the rest of the island. Get Belfast right and the rest should follow.

    I have disagreed with very little in @Alanbrooke’s excellent series but I fear his own antipathy to the current Irish government stance on Brexit has led him astray: hardcore Leavers are far more upset with it than ordinary unionists. Indeed, such polling as there has been suggests that messing up Brexit is worse for the union.

    My reaction to Varadkar is not based on Brexit, but rather an innate concern as to why anyone would want to stir up the whole Northern Ireland swamp when it was starting to settle down.

    While Brexit is no way the fault of the irish government, to me the correct approach was to set a working party to one side from both governments and sort the border issue away from the headlines, Varadkar has made an issue of something he would have been best advised to leave alone.
    Like how the British, Spanish & Gibraltarians have sorted out that other "show stopper" Gibraltar?

    http://chronicle.gi/2018/10/on-the-cusp-of-a-deal/
    Out of curiosity, does anyone know how does Brexit affect the UK sovereign bases on Cyprus?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,299
    It is a very good series of articles indeed. May could have done with reading them 18 months ago...

    One though on the capacity for cultural change, is not Ireland a comparatively young country, with a median age significantly below the European average ?
    That is not inconsistent with rapid change, as Iceland perhaps recently demonstrates:
    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2018/oct/17/viking-language-invasion-english-iceland-icelandic
  • philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    rcs1000 said:

    It’s what happened in the Referendum isn’t it? “Life was better ‘once upon a time”, is a common position as Dr Ydoethur points out.

    In 10 years time there’ll be a great yearning for lots of things we had, or could do, when we were part of the EU and that’ll be the moment for us Remainers.

    Edit; don’t know why the block quote didn’t work. The comment about Romania came from IanB2.

    The true tragedy of Brexit is that we are creating ever more divisions in our society. Searching for an analogy, I can't help but think of Hartley Shawcross's terrible "we are the masters now" line.
    Is that actually the cause of divisions or the effect of another driver of divisions?

    I am not talking with any statistical backing but I would not be at all shocked if the increase in societal divisions wasn't equally virulent in many advanced (if that is the right word) nations.

    France, Italy, Greece, USA, Netherlands and many more are in periods of turmoil

    Is the cause more likely to be the speed and ease with which we can communicate? Brexit is probably a function of communications revolution.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,237
    TOPPING said:

    rcs1000 said:

    It’s what happened in the Referendum isn’t it? “Life was better ‘once upon a time”, is a common position as Dr Ydoethur points out.

    In 10 years time there’ll be a great yearning for lots of things we had, or could do, when we were part of the EU and that’ll be the moment for us Remainers.

    Edit; don’t know why the block quote didn’t work. The comment about Romania came from IanB2.

    The true tragedy of Brexit is that we are creating ever more divisions in our society. Searching for an analogy, I can't help but think of Hartley Shawcross's terrible "we are the masters now" line.
    "The true tragedy of Brexit..."

    File under foreseeable consequences.

    From one who voted for it and now no longer lives in "our society".

    I hope you were being ironic Robert.
    No, I'm talking about the tragic divisions opened up between media moguls in Los Angeles by Brexit.
  • IanB2 said:

    felix said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    Oh dear - the old should just f*** off and die eh?
    I had already said it wasn't a serious suggestion, downthread. The serious point is that we all form our political world view in our late teens and early 20s, and this can then be very enduring. As time passes this becomes a less and less reliable basis for objective assessment about contemporary questions.
    Anyone who remembers the 70s is going to have a pretty good idea of what Corbyn wants for the country though, give that that is when he formed his world view.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914

    Can I thank Alanbrooke for an excellent series of articles which are a kind of first on PB. We have never done a 3 parter before.

    When I first read them I felt it important that they run sequentially dominating the site for a day or more. Good stuff.

    thanks Mike. I would encourage other posters to give it a go and give a bit of a break to the PB editorial team whose unfailing efforts need more recognition.

    Indeed. 3 excellent articles and I'm sure to many of us a little known subject.

    For your next one how about 'Ludlow. Can it really sustain 4 Conservative clubs?'
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    edited October 2018
    Interestingly only 35% of Republic of Ireland voters want Irish Unity and only a majority of Sinn Fein voters are committed to that position.

    Although only 9% of Irish voters do not want Irish Unity, the position of the majority of Irish voters, 56%, including a majority of both Fine Gael and Fianna Fail voters is that they do want Irish Unity but not in the next few years as it would not be practical or affordable.

    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2018/06/brexit-the-border-and-the-union/
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    rcs1000 said:

    TOPPING said:

    rcs1000 said:

    It’s what happened in the Referendum isn’t it? “Life was better ‘once upon a time”, is a common position as Dr Ydoethur points out.

    In 10 years time there’ll be a great yearning for lots of things we had, or could do, when we were part of the EU and that’ll be the moment for us Remainers.

    Edit; don’t know why the block quote didn’t work. The comment about Romania came from IanB2.

    The true tragedy of Brexit is that we are creating ever more divisions in our society. Searching for an analogy, I can't help but think of Hartley Shawcross's terrible "we are the masters now" line.
    "The true tragedy of Brexit..."

    File under foreseeable consequences.

    From one who voted for it and now no longer lives in "our society".

    I hope you were being ironic Robert.
    No, I'm talking about the tragic divisions opened up between media moguls in Los Angeles by Brexit.
    It's a shocking story.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    Well done for the headers, which have even kept people vaguely on topic.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    Good Morning Britain reports Nigel Farage May be a contestant on this year's 'I'm a celebrity get me out of here'
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    Roger said:

    Can I thank Alanbrooke for an excellent series of articles which are a kind of first on PB. We have never done a 3 parter before.

    When I first read them I felt it important that they run sequentially dominating the site for a day or more. Good stuff.

    thanks Mike. I would encourage other posters to give it a go and give a bit of a break to the PB editorial team whose unfailing efforts need more recognition.

    Indeed. 3 excellent articles and I'm sure to many of us a little known subject.

    For your next one how about 'Ludlow. Can it really sustain 4 Conservative clubs?'
    Im rinsing my hair blue as we speak :-)
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    ydoethur said:

    Can I thank Alanbrooke for an excellent series of articles which are a kind of first on PB. We have never done a 3 parter before.

    When I first read them I felt it important that they run sequentially dominating the site for a day or more. Good stuff.

    thanks Mike. I would encourage other posters to give it a go and give a bit of a break to the PB editorial team whose unfailing efforts need more recognition.
    Maybe I should submit a review of The Last Jedi...
    You'll come around on it.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    rcs1000 said:

    Mr. 1000, somewhat true. It's also exposing divisions that others were entirely comfortably keeping quiet. As long as the chattering class prevailed, the views of disgruntled peasant folk were sources of amusement rather than concern, if they were considered at all.

    Mr. B2, on Bottas, that's fair enough. I'm still peeved by the Raikkonen pole bet. 0.07s off a straight 14 winner, 0.009s off an each way winner, and it was red.

    Honestly. I haven't been that miffed by a pole bet since Kubica failed to get it in Monaco by 0.002s.

    Oh I agree completely, and that's why I used the "we are the masters now" quote.

    Right now we have a government that is neither reaching out to the ERG or to those who voted Remain but believe we should respect the referendum. They have become utterly disconnected from those who elected them.
    If they reached out to the ERG it would be No Deal, ultra hard Brexit, if they reached out to Remain it would be EUref2.

    May is still trying to respect the referendum result and get a deal with the EU
  • RogerRoger Posts: 19,914
    edited October 2018
    Foxy said:

    Roger said:

    Obviously a patriotic Brexiteer who wants his Empire back!
    I believe that the passenger he objected to was Jamaican originally, so from the Empire.

    The problem seemed to be that she was allowed to sit on the same row as him. I'm Casino Royale and I approve this message.
  • HYUFD said:

    Interestingly only 35% of Republic of Ireland voters want Irish Unity and only a majority of Sinn Fein voters are committed to that position.

    Although only 9% of Irish voters do not want Irish Unity, the position of the majority of Irish voters, 56%, including a majority of both Fine Gael and Fianna Fail voters is that they do want Irish Unity but not in the next few years as it would not be practical or affordable.

    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2018/06/brexit-the-border-and-the-union/

    “O Lord, grant me unity, but not yet”?
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,237
    HYUFD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Mr. 1000, somewhat true. It's also exposing divisions that others were entirely comfortably keeping quiet. As long as the chattering class prevailed, the views of disgruntled peasant folk were sources of amusement rather than concern, if they were considered at all.

    Mr. B2, on Bottas, that's fair enough. I'm still peeved by the Raikkonen pole bet. 0.07s off a straight 14 winner, 0.009s off an each way winner, and it was red.

    Honestly. I haven't been that miffed by a pole bet since Kubica failed to get it in Monaco by 0.002s.

    Oh I agree completely, and that's why I used the "we are the masters now" quote.

    Right now we have a government that is neither reaching out to the ERG or to those who voted Remain but believe we should respect the referendum. They have become utterly disconnected from those who elected them.
    If they reached out to the ERG it would be No Deal, ultra hard Brexit, if they reached out to Remain it would be EUref2.

    May is still trying to respect the referendum result and get a deal with the EU
    She is so focused on the EU, she is failing to communicate with the voters.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    rcs1000 said:

    HYUFD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Mr. 1000, somewhat true. It's also exposing divisions that others were entirely comfortably keeping quiet. As long as the chattering class prevailed, the views of disgruntled peasant folk were sources of amusement rather than concern, if they were considered at all.

    Mr. B2, on Bottas, that's fair enough. I'm still peeved by the Raikkonen pole bet. 0.07s off a straight 14 winner, 0.009s off an each way winner, and it was red.

    Honestly. I haven't been that miffed by a pole bet since Kubica failed to get it in Monaco by 0.002s.

    Oh I agree completely, and that's why I used the "we are the masters now" quote.

    Right now we have a government that is neither reaching out to the ERG or to those who voted Remain but believe we should respect the referendum. They have become utterly disconnected from those who elected them.
    If they reached out to the ERG it would be No Deal, ultra hard Brexit, if they reached out to Remain it would be EUref2.

    May is still trying to respect the referendum result and get a deal with the EU
    She is so focused on the EU, she is failing to communicate with the voters.
    She knows she will not be facing them again, as pm at least. Still a mistake to ignore though.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202

    HYUFD said:

    Interestingly only 35% of Republic of Ireland voters want Irish Unity and only a majority of Sinn Fein voters are committed to that position.

    Although only 9% of Irish voters do not want Irish Unity, the position of the majority of Irish voters, 56%, including a majority of both Fine Gael and Fianna Fail voters is that they do want Irish Unity but not in the next few years as it would not be practical or affordable.

    https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2018/06/brexit-the-border-and-the-union/

    “O Lord, grant me unity, but not yet”?
    Pretty much
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    rcs1000 said:

    HYUFD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Mr. 1000, somewhat true. It's also exposing divisions that others were entirely comfortably keeping quiet. As long as the chattering class prevailed, the views of disgruntled peasant folk were sources of amusement rather than concern, if they were considered at all.

    Mr. B2, on Bottas, that's fair enough. I'm still peeved by the Raikkonen pole bet. 0.07s off a straight 14 winner, 0.009s off an each way winner, and it was red.

    Honestly. I haven't been that miffed by a pole bet since Kubica failed to get it in Monaco by 0.002s.

    Oh I agree completely, and that's why I used the "we are the masters now" quote.

    Right now we have a government that is neither reaching out to the ERG or to those who voted Remain but believe we should respect the referendum. They have become utterly disconnected from those who elected them.
    If they reached out to the ERG it would be No Deal, ultra hard Brexit, if they reached out to Remain it would be EUref2.

    May is still trying to respect the referendum result and get a deal with the EU
    She is so focused on the EU, she is failing to communicate with the voters.
    Most voters want a deal, if May is not focused on the EU they will not get one
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,362
    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    I wonder often about raising the age you can vote at given the stupidity of the young, most of whom would not be able to tell me what democracy was.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Will Brexit be decided by how many MPs of each persuasion are suspended while historical investigations are carried out?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    malcolmg said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    I wonder often about raising the age you can vote at given the stupidity of the young, most of whom would not be able to tell me what democracy was.
    As was linked to the other day the very young are increasingly supportive of the idea of strongman leaders
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited October 2018

    If you want another comparison, the component parts of Poland still seem to vote along geographical lines set by its partition in the 18th century. Though, to be more optimistic, the key word in that sentence might be geographical. Italy remains an exceptionally diverse country because its geography practically dictates that: the Appennines carve the country up, as does its length. Sure, choices have cemented existing divisions but those choices don’t have to be made. Northern Ireland is not particularly geographically distinct from the rest of the island. Get Belfast right and the rest should follow.

    I have disagreed with very little in @Alanbrooke’s excellent series but I fear his own antipathy to the current Irish government stance on Brexit has led him astray: hardcore Leavers are far more upset with it than ordinary unionists. Indeed, such polling as there has been suggests that messing up Brexit is worse for the union.

    My reaction to Varadkar is not based on Brexit, but rather an innate concern as to why anyone would want to stir up the whole Northern Ireland swamp when it was starting to settle down.

    While Brexit is no way the fault of the irish government, to me the correct approach was to set a working party to one side from both governments and sort the border issue away from the headlines, Varadkar has made an issue of something he would have been best advised to leave alone.
    Like how the British, Spanish & Gibraltarians have sorted out that other "show stopper" Gibraltar?

    http://chronicle.gi/2018/10/on-the-cusp-of-a-deal/
    yes. There are some differences of course but watching Gibraltar versus NI there's quite a gap. In all truth I would have expected the spanish to be the more difficult to reach an agreement with.
    I suspect the change of government in Spain helped - but they also wisely punted things like "Sovereignty" into the future. Neither side has tried to address it - its something we will no doubt to return to and its been handled "without prejudice."

    The Dublin/Brussels attempt on the other hand to shoehorn something from the 'Future relationship" into a Withdrawal Agreement that does not address the Future Relationship could bring about the one thing its designed to avoid.
  • malcolmg said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    I wonder often about raising the age you can vote at given the stupidity of the young, most of whom would not be able to tell me what democracy was.
    As has been pointed out by many people before, democracy is a very bad way to run a country. All the other ways are worse of course so we are stuck with it.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    F1: Ocon and Magnussen both disqualified.

    Bit annoyed, as I thought I'd finished writing the post-race ramble. *sighs*
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    ydoethur said:

    IanB2 said:

    The Romanian figures are extraordinary. Ceausescu's Romania was the saddest place I have ever travelled.

    On a Soviet joke site (now sadly taken down) among all the puns, quips and Radio Yerevan jokes was a simple one-liner:

    'Nicolae Ceaucescu was knighted in 1979.'

    I assumed it was another joke.

    It wasn't.
    Wasn’t he made a Stranger Knight? Far more significant and embarrassing than a mere Knight. I guess that’s why people don’t talk about it.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    ,
    rcs1000 said:

    HYUFD said:

    rcs1000 said:

    Mr. 1000, somewhat true. It's also exposing divisions that others were entirely comfortably keeping quiet. As long as the chattering class prevailed, the views of disgruntled peasant folk were sources of amusement rather than concern, if they were considered at all.

    Mr. B2, on Bottas, that's fair enough. I'm still peeved by the Raikkonen pole bet. 0.07s off a straight 14 winner, 0.009s off an each way winner, and it was red.

    Honestly. I haven't been that miffed by a pole bet since Kubica failed to get it in Monaco by 0.002s.

    Oh I agree completely, and that's why I used the "we are the masters now" quote.

    Right now we have a government that is neither reaching out to the ERG or to those who voted Remain but believe we should respect the referendum. They have become utterly disconnected from those who elected them.
    If they reached out to the ERG it would be No Deal, ultra hard Brexit, if they reached out to Remain it would be EUref2.

    May is still trying to respect the referendum result and get a deal with the EU
    She is so focused on the EU, she is failing to communicate with the voters.
    To be fair, if it wasn’t the EU she’d be focussed on something else and also failing to communicate with the voters.

    It’s in her nature.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, more than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    Last week people are talking about taking my free TV, now it’s my vote!

    Can we keep ours; wife and I are staunch Remainers!
    It wasn't a serious suggestion! Nevertheless it is striking how difficult it is, as one gets older, not to judge everything through the prism of considerations and experiences that are really time-expired.
    As opposed to the naivety and folly of youth?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    malcolmg said:

    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    This article is from 2009 but quite illuminating - 49% of East Germans then felt that life in the GDR was more good than bad, and 8% feel it was better than the current situation.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/homesick-for-a-dictatorship-majority-of-eastern-germans-feel-life-better-under-communism-a-634122.html

    That doesn't mean that 57% would like to recreate it, obviously. My impression from various sources is that East Germans acknowledge that life has become materially better, but many feel second-class citizens, whereas before they felt they were an equal part of a difficult but shared life with a degree of social support that is largely absent now - the same kind of sentiment that you hear in the former coalfield areas in Britain.

    Edit: found a Reddit overview from last year showing similar sentiments throughout Eastern Europe. The Romanian findings are particularly startling - nostalgia for Ceaucescu!

    https://www.reddit.com/r/communism/comments/649fe1/25_years_later_polls_in_eastern_europe_show/

    There's quite an interesting YouTube series on this, by the Curator of the DDR Museum. It talks about what they did have, mhow ore than what they didn't. However, the most illuminating one is this one:
    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5bpijVgZWhg#
    Foreshadowing the later national programme?
    There is also an English-language film; My DDR Tee-Shirt (http://myddrtshirt.co.uk) made by an independent film-maker, Ian Hawkins. Very illuminating. He even found a British academic who had emigrated TO the DDR.

    Isn’t also true that the vast majority of the Communist votes in Russian elections are those of older people?
    Sometimes one is forced to wonder about the potential for a maximum voting age. Living in the past isn't healthy for a democracy.
    I wonder often about raising the age you can vote at given the stupidity of the young, most of whom would not be able to tell me what democracy was.
    How about we respect all adults in the electorate of whatever age, and focus on trying to win them over, rather than gerrymander it to suit our preferred political outcome at any given time?
  • FishingFishing Posts: 5,058
    rcs1000 said:



    The true tragedy of Brexit is that we are creating ever more divisions in our society. Searching for an analogy, I can't help but think of Hartley Shawcross's terrible "we are the masters now" line.

    No, it was our EU membership and the associated consequences (loss of sovereignty and control over laws, uncontrolled immigration from Eastern Europe, crippling financial contributions, etc.) that created those divisions. Brexit simply reflected them.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,301
    Brexit 95% done says TM. Sounds like we're ahead of schedule!
  • FishingFishing Posts: 5,058
    On topic, I wonder if a better analogy for Ireland after reunification isn't Israel+the Palestinian Territories? No comparison will ever be perfect, of course, but you have religious fanaticism, an economic basket case vs a prosperous modern economy and intractable border issues caused by settlers moving into territory which one side has claimed has always been theirs. In Germany, you only had one of those three.

    Most evidence from the modern world shows that ethnic and religious conflicts inspire many people to fanaticism, and are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to resolve. On the bright side, if a Greater Ireland in a single state can work, maybe a one-state solution can work for Israel too?

    Although, again, it's very difficult to read across from one conflict to the other.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    I don’t
    Fishing said:

    On topic, I wonder if a better analogy for Ireland after reunification isn't Israel+the Palestinian Territories? No comparison will ever be perfect, of course, but you have religious fanaticism, an economic basket case vs a prosperous modern economy and intractable border issues caused by settlers moving into territory which one side has claimed has always been theirs. In Germany, you only had one of those three.

    Most evidence from the modern world shows that ethnic and religious conflicts inspire many people to fanaticism, and are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to resolve. On the bright side, if a Greater Ireland in a single state can work, maybe a one-state solution can work for Israel too?

    Although, again, it's very difficult to read across from one conflict to the other.

    I don’t think either side in Ireland supports genocide
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    F1: post-race analysis up here: http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.com/2018/10/us-post-race-analysis.html

    If you only read these occasionally, make this one of those occasions. Race was great and the result interesting both at the sharp end and the competitive midfield.

    One thing I forgot to mention is that early on (first five races or so) Raikkonen had drifted to about 51 or 61 to win. I think that still had fifth the odds for top 3 available. It's going to be him or Bottas, probably (Verstappen's fairly close but probably still too distant).
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    rkrkrk said:

    Brexit 95% done says TM. Sounds like we're ahead of schedule!

    Hmm, I'm reminded of the old joke that the first 90% takes 50% of the time and the other 50% of the time is taken by the last 90%.
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    edited October 2018
    Charles said:

    I don’t

    Fishing said:

    On topic, I wonder if a better analogy for Ireland after reunification isn't Israel+the Palestinian Territories? No comparison will ever be perfect, of course, but you have religious fanaticism, an economic basket case vs a prosperous modern economy and intractable border issues caused by settlers moving into territory which one side has claimed has always been theirs. In Germany, you only had one of those three.

    Most evidence from the modern world shows that ethnic and religious conflicts inspire many people to fanaticism, and are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to resolve. On the bright side, if a Greater Ireland in a single state can work, maybe a one-state solution can work for Israel too?

    Although, again, it's very difficult to read across from one conflict to the other.

    I don’t think either side in Ireland supports genocide
    Yeah it is pretty hard to compare either side in Ireland (in recent times) to Israeli brutality. The modern day Irish conflict on either side really doesn't compare to Palestinian suffering. Which probably indicates there is a long way to go.
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612
    rkrkrk said:

    Brexit 95% done says TM. Sounds like we're ahead of schedule!

    Err...there seems to have been no progress on the political declaration. So why is May saying we are close to a deal?

    Since the EU have given up all hope of rational conversation with May on trade, they have focussed just on getting the WA signed, which gives the EU all the things it wants but gives the UK next to nothing.

    So, instead of refocussing on the political declaration, May just goes along with what the EU want, ready to declare a ‘deal’ when the most important part has not been agreed.

    She really is an idiot.
This discussion has been closed.