Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » However improbable. Looking at the next Prime Minister market

SystemSystem Posts: 12,173
edited October 2018 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » However improbable. Looking at the next Prime Minister market

It’s getting messy.  In truth, that was always on the cards after the general election result.  The public in their wisdom delivered a Parliament with no overall majority, with two main parties both formally committed to implementing Brexit and neither sharing any kind of consensus over what that meant in practice.  Theresa May has spent the last 16 months navigating between competing interest groups, endlessly deferring decisions, endlessly conceding ground whenever short term coalitions formed against her and evading final verdicts on her direction of progress in the negotiations.

Read the full story here


«13456

Comments

  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    First?
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Second! Like Corbyn & Remain.
  • swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,464
    Third, like the next EU referendum.......
  • swing_voterswing_voter Posts: 1,464
    I do like the starting bit....its getting messy - perhaps the greatest understatement I have seen this year, I ant imagine how this is written about and explained in a decade or so...perhaps a bit like the drift to invading Iraq. I like the point about a "completely different" person emerging as PM...step forward Tony Blair.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936
    Perhaps it's time for another peer of the realm to be PM? The youngsters don't seem too keen on democracy these days, so it'd be a nice compromise. :D
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Excellent thread. Unlike New Labour where "The future is certain, its the past that keeps changing" the future does indeed look intriguing. However, I suspect after more tears before bedtime, tantrums, foot stamping and walkouts, Mrs May and the EU will cobble together some sort of deal which gets us out of the mess the EU's (selective) backstop has backed us into. This will pass in parliament and the bickering over the future relationship will be postponed until the EU sorts out the fires on its southern borders. This time next year, Magic Grandpa and Mrs May will still be in place (unless the latter has gone of her own volition) and things will be ticking along.

    Minor niggle, perhaps swept away by the pyroclastic flow might have been a more accurate metaphor than survive the pyroclastic blast.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176
    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.
  • It's a great thread. Three quick points which I'm sure Alastair is aware of but may have been missed in drafting. #1 The FTPA says VoNC are in governments not PMs. In Alastair's senario if no one can be found to replace May as PM within 14 days the Commons could just vote again on a fresh VoC and pass it. May would just carry on as PM. #2 The FTPA dissolves parliament 14 days after a VoNC if no subsequent VoC passes. So the phrase " no General Election is scheduled " wouldn't necesserily be true. #3 The Queen appontments the PM but as a Constitutonal Monarch she also acts on the advice of Ministers. The current cabinet manual says a PM can't resign until they are in a position to advise HM who to send for. In what circumstances would May conclude she should recommend Corbyn, Cooper or Cable rather than call a General Election ? The Queen is 92. In modern era she wouldn't want to touch government formation at the best of times. These are not the best of times.

    However I agree with Alastair that the names Cooper and Hammond stand out. Centrist figures ( in Brexit terms ) who's attraction as temp. PM is exactly that their own party wouldn't elect them on their own.
  • Re: Brexit itself well what is their to say. Suez on Steroids as I've argued since the 24/6/16 with constitutional crisis as a substitute for military defeat. Brexit is a constitutional crisis. An alien constitutional event, an advisory referendum onnan existential issue, is forcing the Queen-in-Parliament which is where soveriegnty lies to do something it can't and doesn't want to do. So the whole machine is blowing up. However chaotic Brexit has been todate this is still the initial phase. There is much worse to come.

    And one of the reasons with is Suez on Steroids is their is no sane US president to tell us we are drunk and go home as in the original Suez. President Clinton or indeed any normal US administration would have banged heads together by now. But Trump is happy to watch the world burn as it suits his agenda.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,936

    Re: Brexit itself well what is their to say. Suez on Steroids as I've argued since the 24/6/16 with constitutional crisis as a substitute for military defeat. Brexit is a constitutional crisis. An alien constitutional event, an advisory referendum onnan existential issue, is forcing the Queen-in-Parliament which is where soveriegnty lies to do something it can't and doesn't want to do. So the whole machine is blowing up. However chaotic Brexit has been todate this is still the initial phase. There is much worse to come.

    And one of the reasons with is Suez on Steroids is their is no sane US president to tell us we are drunk and go home as in the original Suez. President Clinton or indeed any normal US administration would have banged heads together by now. But Trump is happy to watch the world burn as it suits his agenda.

    Clinton would have stopped Brexit? Not sure what right she would have had to meddle.
  • RobD said:

    Perhaps it's time for another peer of the realm to be PM? The youngsters don't seem too keen on democracy these days, so it'd be a nice compromise. :D

    I notice Blair made a major Brexit speech *at the Labour Party constituency dinner* in his *old seat* of Sedgefield in the last 7 days. How interesting.
  • Finally it's clear this final stage of the Brexit negotiations are faux drama. 90% of the Deal is done. Rhere are several options on Ireland and it's clear May/Robbins woukd sign up to several of them. And we still have loads of time to ratify a deal.

    This is now purely about the nternal internal politics of the Tory Party. There will be a deal as we have no choice. It's going to be a dreadful deal because we have no choice. The deal will enrage most Remainers because it's Brexit and not a Unicorn. The deal will enrage most Brexiters it's not a Unicorn and thus not Brexit. The deal will be chronically unpopular because their is too little centre ground on this topic and it's too late to build one. Which Tory with a future will want to vote for May's deal ? Which Labour MP with a future will want to rescue May ?

    May needs a Cabinet and a Commons majority of grey beards who are prepared to save the ship because they are innthe Autumn/Winter of their careers. The added problem is such figures tend to be exactly the sorts of folk who'll have the dimest view of Brexit innthe first place.

    My instinct is the narrative has spent too much time on whether a deal will be done. It suggests doing a deal will bring closure. We've under analysed that the next Stage is that deal will be chronically unpopular.
  • BromptonautBromptonaut Posts: 1,113

    Finally it's clear this final stage of the Brexit negotiations are faux drama. 90% of the Deal is done. Rhere are several options on Ireland and it's clear May/Robbins woukd sign up to several of them. And we still have loads of time to ratify a deal.

    This is now purely about the nternal internal politics of the Tory Party. There will be a deal as we have no choice. It's going to be a dreadful deal because we have no choice. The deal will enrage most Remainers because it's Brexit and not a Unicorn. The deal will enrage most Brexiters it's not a Unicorn and thus not Brexit. The deal will be chronically unpopular because their is too little centre ground on this topic and it's too late to build one. Which Tory with a future will want to vote for May's deal ? Which Labour MP with a future will want to rescue May ?

    May needs a Cabinet and a Commons majority of grey beards who are prepared to save the ship because they are innthe Autumn/Winter of their careers. The added problem is such figures tend to be exactly the sorts of folk who'll have the dimest view of Brexit innthe first place.

    My instinct is the narrative has spent too much time on whether a deal will be done. It suggests doing a deal will bring closure. We've under analysed that the next Stage is that deal will be chronically unpopular.

    Very good.

    1. “This is now purely about the internal politics of the Tory Party.”

    It has always been thus, ever since the days of Heath. Membership of the EU sets up two wholly irreconcilable thoughts in the Tory hive mind.

    It’s good for business therefore I like it.

    I’m not in charge, as is my God-given right, therefore I don’t like it.

    2. Most people have tuned out the endless twists and turns we all find so fascinating. They will tune back in as soon as there’s a deal, and they really really won’t like it.

    Buy shares in cardboard, felt tip pen and shoe manufacturers, there’ll be lots more placards and marching over the weeks and months to come.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    Interesting idea. Howwver, I still see this as rather unlikely and a snap general election far more so.

    I'd want very good odds to be tempted on this.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    Interesting idea. Howwver, I still see this as rather unlikely and a snap general election far more so.

    I'd want very good odds to be tempted on this.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    RobD said:

    Re: Brexit itself well what is their to say. Suez on Steroids as I've argued since the 24/6/16 with constitutional crisis as a substitute for military defeat. Brexit is a constitutional crisis. An alien constitutional event, an advisory referendum onnan existential issue, is forcing the Queen-in-Parliament which is where soveriegnty lies to do something it can't and doesn't want to do. So the whole machine is blowing up. However chaotic Brexit has been todate this is still the initial phase. There is much worse to come.

    And one of the reasons with is Suez on Steroids is their is no sane US president to tell us we are drunk and go home as in the original Suez. President Clinton or indeed any normal US administration would have banged heads together by now. But Trump is happy to watch the world burn as it suits his agenda.

    Clinton would have stopped Brexit? Not sure what right she would have had to meddle.
    If the front page of the FT today is anything to go by the US is actually on our side (and not the EU's) when it comes to domiciling banks in the UK.

    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/f9ba5588-d21a-11e8-a9f2-7574db66bcd5
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,301
    I do love a hypothetical thread header.

    I don't think enough Labour MPs would back Hammond, unless he promised a 2nd referendum (killing support within his own party).

    Vince is a non-starter, he'll never get enough Labour support post-Coalition or Tories to trust he will implement Brexit.

    Yvette is just possible I think, perhaps if she promised to try to secure Norway/soft Brexit. How Corbyn would react is anyone's guess!

    Other possibilities - Ed Miliband, Ken Clarke, Liz Kendall?
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176
    @Casino_Royale - Congratulations!
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676
    The Labour will back the following options

    1) Jeremy Corbyn
    2) see above
  • TheJezziahTheJezziah Posts: 3,840
    edited October 2018

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Awesome news, congrats!

    I understand the joys of parenthood make up for the lack of sleep and social life ;)

    Also interesting read as always AM. Edit: He should get paid double his current rate per article at least...

  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congratulations.

    If it's a girl, May I suggest Theresa?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congratulations. May your child pay taxes towards my pension and sundry other freebies handed out to reasonably well off elderlies for no obvious reason for a long time to come.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,301

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Yes congratulations!
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Well done, another Corbynite.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,914
    rkrkrk said:

    I do love a hypothetical thread header.

    I don't think enough Labour MPs would back Hammond, unless he promised a 2nd referendum (killing support within his own party).

    Vince is a non-starter, he'll never get enough Labour support post-Coalition or Tories to trust he will implement Brexit.

    Yvette is just possible I think, perhaps if she promised to try to secure Norway/soft Brexit. How Corbyn would react is anyone's guess!

    Other possibilities - Ed Miliband, Ken Clarke, Liz Kendall?

    Everybody mentioned, Yvette Cooper, Vince Cable and Philip Hammond in the header plus yours are Remainers. Presumably they would need to organise a 2nd referendum, so betting on that might cover all of them, plus more.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    congrats. CR hope all goes well

    could I just advise you may want to luxuriate in sleep now, you wont get much of it for the next 10 years
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congratulations.

    If it's a girl, May I suggest Theresa?
    Many thanks. Yes, it is a girl!
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    Jonathan said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Well done, another Corbynite.
    Lol. I’ll sign her up for your West Sussex Marxist meet on birth ;-)
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    DavidL said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congratulations. May your child pay taxes towards my pension and sundry other freebies handed out to reasonably well off elderlies for no obvious reason for a long time to come.
    Lol. I’m sure she’ll be thrilled.

    The quid pro quo is that she must visit us in the old people’s home, bringing us smiles, fruit and biscuits and tolerating my rantings.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892
    On topic there was always going to be a crunch point in the discussions with the EU. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that one of the many, many mistakes made by May has been not to have a foot stomping walk out at an earlier stage when there was more time to play with and the opportunity to make proper preparations for a no deal Brexit.

    In reality the EU has a choice. They can either accept one of the several UK proposals on NI that are currently on the table or they can accept that the UK will be leaving with no deal and a far harder border between the UK and Eire than anything that we are proposing at the moment. It is simply not possible for May to give any more on this because it would not pass the Commons.

    One point arising from PMQs yesterday is that May said that the UK pays its debts and that we will be paying the £39bn whether there is a deal or not. I found that...interesting, not because I disagree with the proposition but because so many of her party, particularly in the ERG, will not.

  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    tlg86 said:

    @Casino_Royale - Congratulations!

    Thanks!
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676

    Jonathan said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Well done, another Corbynite.
    Lol. I’ll sign her up for your West Sussex Marxist meet on birth ;-)
    I’ll knit her a little woolly Lenin hat and placard.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,220

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congratulations.

    If it's a girl, May I suggest Theresa?
    Many thanks. Yes, it is a girl!
    Congratulations :) Woman on the train the other day seemed to have multiple friends that had 'one of each'... All said girls were much more difficult ;)
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    congrats. CR hope all goes well

    could I just advise you may want to luxuriate in sleep now, you wont get much of it for the next 10 years
    In my experience the real sleepless nights start just over 10 years in!
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892

    DavidL said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congratulations. May your child pay taxes towards my pension and sundry other freebies handed out to reasonably well off elderlies for no obvious reason for a long time to come.
    Lol. I’m sure she’ll be thrilled.

    The quid pro quo is that she must visit us in the old people’s home, bringing us smiles, fruit and biscuits and tolerating my rantings.
    Let's just hope those rants are not still about Brexit.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    Pulpstar said:

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congratulations.

    If it's a girl, May I suggest Theresa?
    Many thanks. Yes, it is a girl!
    Congratulations :) Woman on the train the other day seemed to have multiple friends that had 'one of each'... All said girls were much more difficult ;)
    I've got one of each. All three are just as difficult.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 42,728

    tlg86 said:

    @Casino_Royale - Congratulations!

    Thanks!
    Congrats! One tip to your good wife, if I may: don't work until the last minute. Having your waters break during a meeting is rather embarrassing ... So I have been told... ;)
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Many congratulations!

    Margaret Theresa Nadine Royale has a definite ring to it.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    How many Europhobes would have to be expelled to get the old pro Business Tory Party back?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    Pulpstar said:

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congratulations.

    If it's a girl, May I suggest Theresa?
    Many thanks. Yes, it is a girl!
    Congratulations :) Woman on the train the other day seemed to have multiple friends that had 'one of each'... All said girls were much more difficult ;)
    What's the accepted wisdom? If you have a boy you have one prick to worry about; if you have a girl you have every prick out there to worry about.
  • OchEyeOchEye Posts: 1,469

    How many Europhobes would have to be expelled to get the old pro Business Tory Party back?

    I don't know, how many Europhobes would have to be expelled to get the old pro Business Tory Party back?
  • tlg86 said:

    @Casino_Royale - Congratulations!

    Thanks!
    Just woke up to your wonderful news.

    Many congratulations to you both

    So much for you both to look forward to in 2019

    All the very best
  • How many Europhobes would have to be expelled to get the old pro Business Tory Party back?

    I am still here fighting against the ultras and for business
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,413
    DavidL said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    congrats. CR hope all goes well

    could I just advise you may want to luxuriate in sleep now, you wont get much of it for the next 10 years
    In my experience the real sleepless nights start just over 10 years in!
    You go through phases

    First year constant feeding and changing
    Second year sort of a break but no lie ins
    Years 3-5 theyre mobile and crawl in to bed or start running water all over the place at 5 am
    Years 6-10 - its quiet. too quiet, you get suspicious and want to see what theyre up to
    Years 10+ teenage beckons and you have no chance of getting them out of bed in the morning but no chance of getting them in to it the night before
    Year 18+ - they go to uni out of sight out of mind, except now the Mrs stays up all night worrying about them

    Maybe old people sleep a lot because they are catching all that lost sleep back :-)
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,220
    Thought experiment:

    If we have another vote, remain and then 2 years later opinion shifts once again decisively against the EU... Is there a push for yet another vote ?
  • Pulpstar said:

    Thought experiment:

    If we have another vote, remain and then 2 years later opinion shifts once again decisively against the EU... Is there a push for yet another vote ?

    Farage was calling for another vote after conceding on Brexit night....
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676
    Are the rumours true that the gestation period for Casino’s baby is to be extended for 12 months?
  • As EU ultimately laugh at Britain at this summit, remember every sneer equates to British jobs lost in British industry, because the completely unnecessary no deal is a cut of investment into Britain, no deal is unnecessary, and every sneering comment about cherries is 40% Tariffs on our hard pressed farmers as they try to sell their cherries, sheep and other produce, every barked “its all your own fault you are mugs taken in by liars” is not just WTO tariffs on British Business but a lot of admin costs too passed onto other businesses and onto British households still struggling from the polices of the last labour government! that’s not Brexit pain that’s all unnecessary pain, absolutely unnecessarily inflicted on us by the EU! I’m telling as it is, as 27 heads swan to dinner laughing, full of themselves remember it’s the British pound they want to fall, our place in the world being sent down by their cynical refusal to negotiate properly, their snubbing of our good faith, the logical quid pro quo trade deal that has always been there, See them for what they are and what they are doing to us, not just us but our unborn children, an EU not responding to British Proposal in a respectful and professional manner, 27 heads, everyone one of them in the clouds, we know how they fudged and messed up their euro currency this monsters not as clever as it likes to think it is, from today we know it’s a monster devoid of any real feeling for real people in this world, that’s how we know it.

    Before we simply blame our government like the slavishly opportunistic Labour party, “oh we’d conclude negotiations in next to no time, we’re so brilliant”: You cant even negotiate with you own party colleagues to sit next to you on front bench and share your half baked policies, McDonnhell you twat! lets remember May and her ministers always negotiated in good faith, fair to the voice of nearly 18 million patriotic Britain’s, our government honest about everyone’s need for a something for something accord, it was the self-indulgent intransigence of the EU monster that dragged everything to this point.

    The EU is true architect of all the coming pain, not the Brexit vote. No deal was always unnecessary if the EU behaved like a grown up. How dare anyone suggest otherwise! How dare anyone march for a people’s vote after today! Have you no pride? Have you no respect for 17.4 million of your brothers and sisters who saw what this 27 headed monster has become?

    Its the bottom line today thats the killer, the agnostic and lofty EU should care for the culture and fears of the Ulster Unionists, not more but certainly no less than every other person and grouping in its Empire. It’s Because Europe will never be fashioned with flesh of God hating European citizens, but by the blood of her diverse people - otherwise it will always be a fake and crumbling Empire that cannot see this.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,220

    Pulpstar said:

    Thought experiment:

    If we have another vote, remain and then 2 years later opinion shifts once again decisively against the EU... Is there a push for yet another vote ?

    Farage was calling for another vote after conceding on Brexit night....
    Oh sure, but he has no real power.. I mean parliament actually being willing to give yet another referendum.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,426
    Jonathan said:

    Are the rumours true that the gestation period for Casino’s baby is to be extended for 12 months?

    Expressed with elephantine tact...

    I'll get my coat. Have a good morning.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506

    tlg86 said:

    @Casino_Royale - Congratulations!

    Thanks!
    Congrats! One tip to your good wife, if I may: don't work until the last minute. Having your waters break during a meeting is rather embarrassing ... So I have been told... ;)
    Thanks JJ. She’s already down to 3 days a week commuting, and will stop at Christmas, so I feel that’s being sensible.
  • Congrats CR!

    I was wondering who Alastair would put forward for the Labour side. Yvette is a non-starter I'm afraid, even if many Labour MPs were tempted to vote for her how would they get her into office over the head of the Kali Ma hate squad? The Labour view is and will be that only a General Election is in the national interest as any Tory leader like Yvette Cooper is evil.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506

    tlg86 said:

    @Casino_Royale - Congratulations!

    Thanks!
    Just woke up to your wonderful news.

    Many congratulations to you both

    So much for you both to look forward to in 2019

    All the very best
    Thanks, BigG!
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    TOPPING said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Many congratulations!

    Margaret Theresa Nadine Royale has a definite ring to it.
    Cheers. Margaret has been mooted actually!

    Believe it or not, my wife likes it.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676

    TOPPING said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Many congratulations!

    Margaret Theresa Nadine Royale has a definite ring to it.
    Cheers. Margaret has been mooted actually!

    Believe it or not, my wife likes it.
    Come the due date the chant “Maggie out!” will be handy.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,677

    fair to the voice of nearly 18 million patriotic Britain’s,

    After BMI, the inability to use an apostrophe correctly is the most statistically reliable predictor of leave proclivities.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Good morning, everyone.

    Congratulations, Mr. Royale :)

    On-topic: I only ever bet on the next Con leader market for that reason. Imagine how annoying it would be if you get that right but had put the wager on next PM and it ended up being someone from Labour.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    Pulpstar said:

    Thought experiment:

    If we have another vote, remain and then 2 years later opinion shifts once again decisively against the EU... Is there a push for yet another vote ?

    Nope, votes to Remain are binding.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,676
    Top tip to CR. Having gone in and conceived a union, voting to take back control and demanding your DNA back on a bus, tends to go down badly with the wife. You will end up with no deal.

  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    DavidL said:

    On topic there was always going to be a crunch point in the discussions with the EU. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that one of the many, many mistakes made by May has been not to have a foot stomping walk out at an earlier stage when there was more time to play with and the opportunity to make proper preparations for a no deal Brexit.

    In reality the EU has a choice. They can either accept one of the several UK proposals on NI that are currently on the table or they can accept that the UK will be leaving with no deal and a far harder border between the UK and Eire than anything that we are proposing at the moment. It is simply not possible for May to give any more on this because it would not pass the Commons.

    One point arising from PMQs yesterday is that May said that the UK pays its debts and that we will be paying the £39bn whether there is a deal or not. I found that...interesting, not because I disagree with the proposition but because so many of her party, particularly in the ERG, will not.

    One point that’s been barely commented upon (except by Guido, funnily enough) is that an extra year’s transition not only buys more time for the trade deal but also gifts the EU an extra £10bn.

    I thus think it’s a UK concession to them to buy something else, like some movement on NI or flexibility on treating the UK more cohesively more broadly.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. Royale, it might be a concession but that doesn't mean it'll get us anything. The EU isn't negotiating in good faith and they have a record of banking concessions and asking for more rather than reciprocating or even making good on promises (rebate and CAP reform springs to mind).
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,176
    On final thing on asylum seekers in Germay, have a look at Figure 5 from the piece below:

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/padr.12042

    That piece says "Over two thirds (69.2 percent) of asylum applicants in Germany from the principal countries of origin in 2015 are male."

    I suppose one could argue that they still got 50,000 women of child baring age plus around 60,000 girls, but the price was a lot more men. Perhaps @rcs1000 thinks German women are just waiting to be swept off their feet by a young man from the Middle East.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,628

    Pulpstar said:

    Thought experiment:

    If we have another vote, remain and then 2 years later opinion shifts once again decisively against the EU... Is there a push for yet another vote ?

    Nope, votes to Remain are binding.
    I could quite imagine that, to stop any serial flouncers, the EU will amend Article 50 so that it can only be triggered one time.

    Applicable retrospectively.

    We would be the only country who could never leave....
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,127
    Huge congrats to Mr and Mrs @Casino_Royale!
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Are you going to find out if it is a Leaver or Remainer in advance, or just wait for the surprise?

    Seriously, congratulations!
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,506
    Jonathan said:

    Top tip to CR. Having gone in and conceived a union, voting to take back control and demanding your DNA back on a bus, tends to go down badly with the wife. You will end up with no deal.

    Your “Maggie out!” gag was better ;-)
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 53,892

    DavidL said:

    On topic there was always going to be a crunch point in the discussions with the EU. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that one of the many, many mistakes made by May has been not to have a foot stomping walk out at an earlier stage when there was more time to play with and the opportunity to make proper preparations for a no deal Brexit.

    In reality the EU has a choice. They can either accept one of the several UK proposals on NI that are currently on the table or they can accept that the UK will be leaving with no deal and a far harder border between the UK and Eire than anything that we are proposing at the moment. It is simply not possible for May to give any more on this because it would not pass the Commons.

    One point arising from PMQs yesterday is that May said that the UK pays its debts and that we will be paying the £39bn whether there is a deal or not. I found that...interesting, not because I disagree with the proposition but because so many of her party, particularly in the ERG, will not.

    One point that’s been barely commented upon (except by Guido, funnily enough) is that an extra year’s transition not only buys more time for the trade deal but also gifts the EU an extra £10bn.

    I thus think it’s a UK concession to them to buy something else, like some movement on NI or flexibility on treating the UK more cohesively more broadly.
    My concern is that the current level of uncertainty is damaging. Quite how damaging is hard to say. There has been a fall off in investment across western Europe, for example, it's not just us. Nevertheless I think it will be beneficial to have a clear set of rules within which businesses can operate as soon as possible. If the transition period is extended simply because we cannot agree what those rules should be and have no clear pathway to determining them then I do not think an extension is to our advantage, quite the reverse.
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    Dura_Ace said:

    fair to the voice of nearly 18 million patriotic Britain’s,

    After BMI, the inability to use an apostrophe correctly is the most statistically reliable predictor of leave proclivities.
    Is that BMI one actually a fact? I can well believe it given the age distribution of leavers versus remainers, but have the measurements been done?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,628
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Well done, another Corbynite.
    Lol. I’ll sign her up for your West Sussex Marxist meet on birth ;-)
    I’ll knit her a little woolly Lenin hat and placard.
    I'm now expecting to see many knitted placards at the "People's" Vote* march....

    *other names are available....
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992
    So Tezza is going to offer "my (ie the EU's) deal or no deal".

    What a master strategist.

    Cos "her" deal as it relates to NI will send the Brexiters absolutely mental.
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612
    DavidL said:

    On topic there was always going to be a crunch point in the discussions with the EU. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that one of the many, many mistakes made by May has been not to have a foot stomping walk out at an earlier stage when there was more time to play with and the opportunity to make proper preparations for a no deal Brexit.

    In reality the EU has a choice. They can either accept one of the several UK proposals on NI that are currently on the table or they can accept that the UK will be leaving with no deal and a far harder border between the UK and Eire than anything that we are proposing at the moment. It is simply not possible for May to give any more on this because it would not pass the Commons.

    One point arising from PMQs yesterday is that May said that the UK pays its debts and that we will be paying the £39bn whether there is a deal or not. I found that...interesting, not because I disagree with the proposition but because so many of her party, particularly in the ERG, will not.

    Legally, the UK has no liability to the EU. Hammond is wrong and rather than relying on the Government's normal process for legal advice he seems to have got some from the Treasury solicitors, which I think we all know are about as objective as HYUFD.

    There are two legal issues - there is no primary liability; and even if there was, there is no jurisdiction in which this can be enforced.

    Apart from everything else, the public were hugely anti paying the EU even in the event of a deal. If the Tories try to pay them for no deal, they are seriously screwed. It can't be defended as paying our obligations because there are great legal minds who have decided this is not true. It says everything about May and Hammond that they are even talking about this.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    DavidL said:

    On topic there was always going to be a crunch point in the discussions with the EU. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that one of the many, many mistakes made by May has been not to have a foot stomping walk out at an earlier stage when there was more time to play with and the opportunity to make proper preparations for a no deal Brexit.

    In reality the EU has a choice. They can either accept one of the several UK proposals on NI that are currently on the table or they can accept that the UK will be leaving with no deal and a far harder border between the UK and Eire than anything that we are proposing at the moment. It is simply not possible for May to give any more on this because it would not pass the Commons.

    One point arising from PMQs yesterday is that May said that the UK pays its debts and that we will be paying the £39bn whether there is a deal or not. I found that...interesting, not because I disagree with the proposition but because so many of her party, particularly in the ERG, will not.

    Legally, the UK has no liability to the EU. Hammond is wrong and rather than relying on the Government's normal process for legal advice he seems to have got some from the Treasury solicitors, which I think we all know are about as objective as HYUFD.

    There are two legal issues - there is no primary liability; and even if there was, there is no jurisdiction in which this can be enforced.

    Apart from everything else, the public were hugely anti paying the EU even in the event of a deal. If the Tories try to pay them for no deal, they are seriously screwed. It can't be defended as paying our obligations because there are great legal minds who have decided this is not true. It says everything about May and Hammond that they are even talking about this.
    So we go rogue.

    Your idealist logic is faultless; your understanding of politics less so.
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612
    TOPPING said:

    So Tezza is going to offer "my (ie the EU's) deal or no deal".

    What a master strategist.

    Cos "her" deal as it relates to NI will send the Brexiters absolutely mental.

    It will send the whole Tory party mental. She ruled out agreeing to the permanent backstop. It was not the Brexiteers who insisted on this - it was everyone.

    She can't just agree to it now on the basis that all things considered in her view it probably is pretty unlikely that it would ever be used.
  • Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,337
    DavidL said:

    DavidL said:

    On topic there was always going to be a crunch point in the discussions with the EU. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that one of the many, many mistakes made by May has been not to have a foot stomping walk out at an earlier stage when there was more time to play with and the opportunity to make proper preparations for a no deal Brexit.

    In reality the EU has a choice. They can either accept one of the several UK proposals on NI that are currently on the table or they can accept that the UK will be leaving with no deal and a far harder border between the UK and Eire than anything that we are proposing at the moment. It is simply not possible for May to give any more on this because it would not pass the Commons.

    One point arising from PMQs yesterday is that May said that the UK pays its debts and that we will be paying the £39bn whether there is a deal or not. I found that...interesting, not because I disagree with the proposition but because so many of her party, particularly in the ERG, will not.

    One point that’s been barely commented upon (except by Guido, funnily enough) is that an extra year’s transition not only buys more time for the trade deal but also gifts the EU an extra £10bn.

    I thus think it’s a UK concession to them to buy something else, like some movement on NI or flexibility on treating the UK more cohesively more broadly.
    My concern is that the current level of uncertainty is damaging. Quite how damaging is hard to say. There has been a fall off in investment across western Europe, for example, it's not just us. Nevertheless I think it will be beneficial to have a clear set of rules within which businesses can operate as soon as possible. If the transition period is extended simply because we cannot agree what those rules should be and have no clear pathway to determining them then I do not think an extension is to our advantage, quite the reverse.
    But presumably a longer transition would be less uncertain than no transition at all (and no settlement on lorries crossing the Chanel, planes flying, medicines being traded etc). It seems to me the current uncertainty is about no deal rather than what comes after a WA, and most business would have as long a transition as was needed to find a workable deal thereafter.
  • Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,337
    edited October 2018
    DavidL said:




    My concern is that the current level of uncertainty is damaging. Quite how damaging is hard to say. There has been a fall off in investment across western Europe, for example, it's not just us. Nevertheless I think it will be beneficial to have a clear set of rules within which businesses can operate as soon as possible. If the transition period is extended simply because we cannot agree what those rules should be and have no clear pathway to determining them then I do not think an extension is to our advantage, quite the reverse.

    But presumably a longer transition would be less uncertain than no transition at all (and no settlement on lorries crossing the Chanel, planes flying, medicines being traded etc). It seems to me the current uncertainty is about no deal rather than what comes after a WA, and most business would have as long a transition as was needed to find a workable deal thereafter.
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612
    TOPPING said:

    DavidL said:

    On topic there was always going to be a crunch point in the discussions with the EU. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that one of the many, many mistakes made by May has been not to have a foot stomping walk out at an earlier stage when there was more time to play with and the opportunity to make proper preparations for a no deal Brexit.

    In reality the EU has a choice. They can either accept one of the several UK proposals on NI that are currently on the table or they can accept that the UK will be leaving with no deal and a far harder border between the UK and Eire than anything that we are proposing at the moment. It is simply not possible for May to give any more on this because it would not pass the Commons.

    One point arising from PMQs yesterday is that May said that the UK pays its debts and that we will be paying the £39bn whether there is a deal or not. I found that...interesting, not because I disagree with the proposition but because so many of her party, particularly in the ERG, will not.

    Legally, the UK has no liability to the EU. Hammond is wrong and rather than relying on the Government's normal process for legal advice he seems to have got some from the Treasury solicitors, which I think we all know are about as objective as HYUFD.

    There are two legal issues - there is no primary liability; and even if there was, there is no jurisdiction in which this can be enforced.

    Apart from everything else, the public were hugely anti paying the EU even in the event of a deal. If the Tories try to pay them for no deal, they are seriously screwed. It can't be defended as paying our obligations because there are great legal minds who have decided this is not true. It says everything about May and Hammond that they are even talking about this.
    So we go rogue.

    Your idealist logic is faultless; your understanding of politics less so.
    Rogue? Not paying something that you have no legal requirement to pay just because someone demands it? I think my understanding of politics is just fine, thanks.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    edited October 2018
    If the Tories pick an interim.PM by coronation to replace May it would be Davis, Corbyn of course would need the support of the SNP and LDs.

    Most likely May stays for years in a BINO Brexit, the ERG do not have the numbers to topple her
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Yay!

    I was going to say, pop over to Dublin to give birth, but I find Ireland abolished jus soli in 2005.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    Even if there was a second referendum, and even if Remain won, what on earth is the value to the EU of a surly and recalcitrant UK rejoining (or forced not to leave) ?

    Given the levels of dissatisfaction with the EU in the UK (and vice versa), & the acrimony over the negotiations, the pre-existing state of affairs cannot be returned to.

    What has been done cannot be undone.

    The EU basically has the choice of the UK pissing inside or outside their tent. They will surely choose outside.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202

    Finally it's clear this final stage of the Brexit negotiations are faux drama. 90% of the Deal is done. Rhere are several options on Ireland and it's clear May/Robbins woukd sign up to several of them. And we still have loads of time to ratify a deal.

    This is now purely about the nternal internal politics of the Tory Party. There will be a deal as we have no choice. It's going to be a dreadful deal because we have no choice. The deal will enrage most Remainers because it's Brexit and not a Unicorn. The deal will enrage most Brexiters it's not a Unicorn and thus not Brexit. The deal will be chronically unpopular because their is too little centre ground on this topic and it's too late to build one. Which Tory with a future will want to vote for May's deal ? Which Labour MP with a future will want to rescue May ?

    May needs a Cabinet and a Commons majority of grey beards who are prepared to save the ship because they are innthe Autumn/Winter of their careers. The added problem is such figures tend to be exactly the sorts of folk who'll have the dimest view of Brexit innthe first place.

    My instinct is the narrative has spent too much time on whether a deal will be done. It suggests doing a deal will bring closure. We've under analysed that the next Stage is that deal will be chronically unpopular.

    In actual fact the polling is clear the median voter would rather May and BINO Brexit than either Corbyn or the ERG and No Deal
  • archer101auarcher101au Posts: 1,612
    This is the problem. He is not talking about the backstop, he is talking about the endgame. May is talking about Chequers, the EU have told her it won't happen so when she keeps going on about it they assume she doesn't have a clue what she is doing.

    Asking for CETA takes this away. Then they might deal over the backstop.

    https://twitter.com/afneil/status/1052806621796155392
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202

    tlg86 said:

    Just watched Robert's latest video. I disagree with him about the Merkel's open door policy. If she was worried about demographics she'd have opened the door to all EU members when she became Chancellor in 2005.

    FPT - I am pleased to announce my wife and I are doing our bit about the UK's demographics with our first due in early February next year.

    Far more exciting and terrifying than Brexit in equal measure, and far more important.
    Congrats on Casino Royale Jnr
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,362
    Dura_Ace said:

    fair to the voice of nearly 18 million patriotic Britain’s,

    After BMI, the inability to use an apostrophe correctly is the most statistically reliable predictor of leave proclivities.
    LOL
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 42,992

    TOPPING said:

    So Tezza is going to offer "my (ie the EU's) deal or no deal".

    What a master strategist.

    Cos "her" deal as it relates to NI will send the Brexiters absolutely mental.

    It will send the whole Tory party mental. She ruled out agreeing to the permanent backstop. It was not the Brexiteers who insisted on this - it was everyone.

    She can't just agree to it now on the basis that all things considered in her view it probably is pretty unlikely that it would ever be used.
    And yet here we are.

    Sounds like there will only be two options. But that's fine because all the letters will be in by the end of the week and she'll be gone, replaced by JRM/Boris/Mad Nad.

    Right?
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,301

    Mr. Royale, it might be a concession but that doesn't mean it'll get us anything. The EU isn't negotiating in good faith and they have a record of banking concessions and asking for more rather than reciprocating or even making good on promises (rebate and CAP reform springs to mind).

    I wonder if the EU see it as a UK concession though?

    From their perspective, it will look like they are allowing the UK more time to benefit from the European Union and put off the pain and difficult decisions of leaving.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    edited October 2018

    DavidL said:




    My concern is that the current level of uncertainty is damaging. Quite how damaging is hard to say. There has been a fall off in investment across western Europe, for example, it's not just us. Nevertheless I think it will be beneficial to have a clear set of rules within which businesses can operate as soon as possible. If the transition period is extended simply because we cannot agree what those rules should be and have no clear pathway to determining them then I do not think an extension is to our advantage, quite the reverse.

    But presumably a longer transition would be less uncertain than no transition at all (and no settlement on lorries crossing the Chanel, planes flying, medicines being traded etc). It seems to me the current uncertainty is about no deal rather than what comes after a WA, and most business would have as long a transition as was needed to find a workable deal thereafter.
    Most businesses would rather an everlasting transition than no deal
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. rkrkrk, the prism of EU fundamentalism is a strange one.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,301

    Mr. rkrkrk, the prism of EU fundamentalism is a strange one.

    But who is asking for the transition to be extended?
    The UK.

    That the EU nations think there is an overall benefit to being in the EU is hardly surprising.
  • YBarddCwscYBarddCwsc Posts: 7,172
    Dura_Ace said:

    fair to the voice of nearly 18 million patriotic Britain’s,

    After BMI, the inability to use an apostrophe correctly is the most statistically reliable predictor of leave proclivities.
    https://www.kvoo.com/newsy/peoples-vote-marchers-demand-final-say-on-brexit

    At 0.03, we see the poster “Mis-Sold Brexit ? The Will of the People is a Peoples Vote”.

    A charming Remainer touch to put in a fussy and unnecessary hyphen, but the crucial apostrophe is missing.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,202
    Labour will scrap the Academies system for schools brought in by Blair and extended by Cameron if Corbyn becomes PM Shadow Education Secretary Angela Rayner has announced

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-45877334
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. rkrkrk, May's endless prevarication and capitulation is not helpful to the side she's meant to be leading.

    Be interesting to see if she proposes a year's extension with a price tag of £10bn what the reaction of her MPs is.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,412
    HYUFD said:

    Finally it's clear this final stage of the Brexit negotiations are faux drama. 90% of the Deal is done. Rhere are several options on Ireland and it's clear May/Robbins woukd sign up to several of them. And we still have loads of time to ratify a deal.

    This is now purely about the nternal internal politics of the Tory Party. There will be a deal as we have no choice. It's going to be a dreadful deal because we have no choice. The deal will enrage most Remainers because it's Brexit and not a Unicorn. The deal will enrage most Brexiters it's not a Unicorn and thus not Brexit. The deal will be chronically unpopular because their is too little centre ground on this topic and it's too late to build one. Which Tory with a future will want to vote for May's deal ? Which Labour MP with a future will want to rescue May ?

    May needs a Cabinet and a Commons majority of grey beards who are prepared to save the ship because they are innthe Autumn/Winter of their careers. The added problem is such figures tend to be exactly the sorts of folk who'll have the dimest view of Brexit innthe first place.

    My instinct is the narrative has spent too much time on whether a deal will be done. It suggests doing a deal will bring closure. We've under analysed that the next Stage is that deal will be chronically unpopular.

    In actual fact the polling is clear the median voter would rather May and BINO Brexit than either Corbyn or the ERG and No Deal
    The more I think about it the more Cameron's concessions were what people wanted. The problem was he then offered a referendum that was blanket in / out when it should have been 3 options as we were / Cameron's slightly removed variation / out.

    If the referendum had done that we wouldn't be in this mess...
  • RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679

    Mr. rkrkrk, the prism of EU fundamentalism is a strange one.

    Maybe so, but Mr rk to the power of 3 is surely right that the extension is a friendly gesture on the part of the EU to give us more time to sort our position out.
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449
    Congratulations Casino, good job making sure the child is born just in time to be an EU citizen :)
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,301

    Mr. rkrkrk, May's endless prevarication and capitulation is not helpful to the side she's meant to be leading.

    Be interesting to see if she proposes a year's extension with a price tag of £10bn what the reaction of her MPs is.

    To my mind, she needs either a change in Brexit policy or a change in the composition of parliament. An extra year is neither here nor there.

    She is going to run into big problems though if her side believe she is making concessions and should therefore get something in return; when in fact it is the EU conceding a longer transition and they are likely to demand further something from the UK.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,814
    Mr. Recidivist, I'd be friendly too, if someone offered me £10bn in exchange for a year of cogitation.
  • AnazinaAnazina Posts: 3,487

    Dura_Ace said:

    fair to the voice of nearly 18 million patriotic Britain’s,

    After BMI, the inability to use an apostrophe correctly is the most statistically reliable predictor of leave proclivities.
    Is that BMI one actually a fact? I can well believe it given the age distribution of leavers versus remainers, but have the measurements been done?
    Indeed so, even when controlling for other factors apparently - @AlastairMeeks will provide the data.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    Dura_Ace said:

    fair to the voice of nearly 18 million patriotic Britain’s,

    After BMI, the inability to use an apostrophe correctly is the most statistically reliable predictor of leave proclivities.
    My BMI has gone down considerably since I accepted a second referendum which included a remain option might be necessary, so you may be on to something.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,177
    HYUFD said:

    Labour will scrap the Academies system for schools brought in by Blair and extended by Cameron if Corbyn becomes PM Shadow Education Secretary Angela Rayner has announced

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-45877334

    I can't say I've noticed what the bloody point of it was in the first place.
This discussion has been closed.