politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The latest Ipsos MORI finding should worry all politicians
Our #issuesindex has been running since 1974 – we rarely add new items unless there’s a clear change – this month in the top ten for the first time – lack of faith in government/politicians…(spontaneously mentioned by respondents). Data out tomorrow
Mervyn King says Brexit approach is incompetent because we don’t have a credible No Deal option but that preparing for it would have taken “several years”.
Now that's getting into interesting territory. I still think March is too soon for a change of heart, but Remainers should certainly have hope, and be looking into options for a swift rejoining.
Mervyn King says Brexit approach is incompetent because we don’t have a credible No Deal option but that preparing for it would have taken “several years”.
Mervyn King says Brexit approach is incompetent because we don’t have a credible No Deal option but that preparing for it would have taken “several years”.
He doesn’t have to have been listening to anyone, just to be rational and not blind - though he does express polite contempt rather well.
The Curtice poll is a striking result, though surely repeatedly polling the same group means that they pay much closer attention to the issues tha the general public ? The research is based on repeated interviews with the same 2,048 people and compares their answers to questions on the same issues over the past
It is, however, around the level of opini9n which ought to make a second referendum a democratic necessity.
Even if it was 60-40 consistently it still wouldn't matter if the Tories are in charge and their voting base is largely made up of the 40. Talking from a purely electoral point of view surely the Conservatives would still press ahead even if things look bad as the alternative may well be worse for them.
'Softer' Brexit is possible due to these factors but Brexit doesn't stop with the Conservatives in charge without major changes in the opinions of Tory voters.
Even if it was 60-40 consistently it still wouldn't matter if the Tories are in charge and their voting base is largely made up of the 40. Talking from a purely electoral point of view surely the Conservatives would still press ahead even if things look bad as the alternative may well be worse for them.
'Softer' Brexit is possible due to these factors but Brexit doesn't stop with the Conservatives in charge without major changes in the opinions of Tory voters.
For which the clusterfuck that is her majesty’s official opposition bears as much responsibility as the clusterfuck that is the government.
It would only be interesting if : a. It was confirmed in multiple polls b. It was a motivator of votes, and was showing up in VI and (say) a parliamentary by-election.
Attitude towards Brexit can hardly show up as a motivator of votes, until the Labour and Conservative Parties make up their minds where they stand.
The Conservative position ranges from simply walking away and pulling down the entire edifice, to remaining, via remaining but pretending not to. At the same time, Labour continue to be all things to all men. OK as a short-term ploy in order to hold things up in the polls, but certainly no use at all in a general election.
It is no wonder that there is distrust of these equivocal politicians.
Even if it was 60-40 consistently it still wouldn't matter if the Tories are in charge and their voting base is largely made up of the 40. Talking from a purely electoral point of view surely the Conservatives would still press ahead even if things look bad as the alternative may well be worse for them.
'Softer' Brexit is possible due to these factors but Brexit doesn't stop with the Conservatives in charge without major changes in the opinions of Tory voters.
I think differently. 60/40 consistently would lead to Labour backing a second referendum, and I think they'd also get the votes of a fair few Tory MPs.
The main issue is Europe. The rising issue is mistrust and distrust of politicians. It is easy to see how these might be related now that Brexit is turning into a right dog's breakfast, whichever way you voted.
Even if it was 60-40 consistently it still wouldn't matter if the Tories are in charge and their voting base is largely made up of the 40. Talking from a purely electoral point of view surely the Conservatives would still press ahead even if things look bad as the alternative may well be worse for them.
'Softer' Brexit is possible due to these factors but Brexit doesn't stop with the Conservatives in charge without major changes in the opinions of Tory voters.
For which the clusterfuck that is her majesty’s official opposition bears as much responsibility as the clusterfuck that is the government.
It would surely still be the case even if a hypothetical new Tony Blair led Labour. The Tories are in charge, their supporters are strongly supportive of Brexit, they will want to press ahead with Brexit unless those supporters (voters) views change.
Even if it was 60-40 consistently it still wouldn't matter if the Tories are in charge and their voting base is largely made up of the 40. Talking from a purely electoral point of view surely the Conservatives would still press ahead even if things look bad as the alternative may well be worse for them.
'Softer' Brexit is possible due to these factors but Brexit doesn't stop with the Conservatives in charge without major changes in the opinions of Tory voters.
I think differently. 60/40 consistently would lead to Labour backing a second referendum, and I think they'd also get the votes of a fair few Tory MPs.
I wouldn't rule that out and then because of the make up of parliament the Conservatives would be stuck (although there is a chance they already are) but even if a few Tory MPs went against it the Conservative party itself would still be pro Brexit.
It would require them falling, which is why I say if the Tories are still in charge. If Labour take power solely or part of a coalition then the calculations change but whilst the Tories remain in charge the party and government position wouldn't (IMO) move away from Brexit without a serious shift in their supporters.
Although I don't quite fully understand a situation where parliament and the government are strongly conflicted but the government doesn't fall.... and to a more obvious and critical point on Brexit consistently than it has been so far under May.
Now that's getting into interesting territory. I still think March is too soon for a change of heart, but Remainers should certainly have hope, and be looking into options for a swift rejoining.
Worth reading the whole report. While there has been a swing, some of it comes from more people 'remembering' they voted Remain than actually did and for 'did not votes last time ' breaking heavily for Remain this time. When you factor all that in it comes out at 53:47 to Remain - not quite so dramatic....
Last week the ISS suffered a pressurisation issue when a docked Soyuz module developed a leak. At the time it was reported to be the result of a micrometeorite or debris impact, but it now appears to have been a manufacturing defect: someone drilled a hole in the wrong place, and filled it with epoxy.
I'm particularly bemused by the following quote about a previous incident: "“I have conducted investigations of all kinds of spacecraft, and after landing, we discovered a hole drilled completely through the hull of a re-entry module," the former Energia employee, Viktor Minenko, said in Gazeta.RU. "But the technician didn't report the defect to anyone but sealed up the hole with epoxy. We found the person, and after a commotion he was terminated,” said Minenko."
'Terminated' in the Russian space industry might not mean fired from his job...
This should only encourage NASA to speed up Boeing and SpaceX's modules, even if Musk is acting like an absolute childish a$$.
Part of the Conclusion from the Curtice Paper which has a 'topline' of 59:41 to Remain:
....attitudes towards whether the UK should be leaving the EU or not have, indeed, been remarkably stable. Britain is still more or less evenly divided between a body of voters who would vote Remain and another group that would vote Leave. Yet from the outset of the Brexit process support for Leave has generally proven a little less firm than that for Remain, and the difference between the willingness of the two sets of voters to vote the same way again may also have widened a little. Meanwhile, those who did not vote in 2016 are noticeably more inclined to say they would now vote Remain rather than Leave.
As a result, instead of a narrow majority in favour of leaving the EU recorded in the referendum in June, there might now be a narrow majority in favour of Remain
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
a. It was confirmed in multiple polls b. It was a motivator of votes, and was showing up in VI and (say) a parliamentary by-election.
Yesterday's Survation put it at 50/50 with a 2% movement towards Leave.
That was a rather unusual poll inits party political side, with UKIP up 4% and LD down 4%, and a 4% Lab lead. it looks a bit of an outlier.
Ah we can discount the polling we dislike strategy. Good one!
As someone who quite likes the poll (from a Labour perspective) I do try to take a longer term view of the polls, one poll with a dramatic change can get me interested but I won't start celebrating or wallowing until it is confirmed over a longer time period and preferably multiple different polls.
I always like the average over a few months that would get posted now and again. I would also add that whilst I don't ignore polling it isn't everything but does have its place in assessment.
Part of the Conclusion from the Curtice Paper which has a 'topline' of 59:41 to Remain:
....attitudes towards whether the UK should be leaving the EU or not have, indeed, been remarkably stable. Britain is still more or less evenly divided between a body of voters who would vote Remain and another group that would vote Leave. Yet from the outset of the Brexit process support for Leave has generally proven a little less firm than that for Remain, and the difference between the willingness of the two sets of voters to vote the same way again may also have widened a little. Meanwhile, those who did not vote in 2016 are noticeably more inclined to say they would now vote Remain rather than Leave.
As a result, instead of a narrow majority in favour of leaving the EU recorded in the referendum in June, there might now be a narrow majority in favour of Remain
The Curtice study was done pre Chequers, completing early July, so may have shifted further.
Not a very surprising stat but noteworthy nevertheless.
Mr. Jessop, pretty serious mistake to make. Although not worthy of termination. One hopes he only lost his job.
Saw on the news last night the idiotic proposal to enshrine sexism in law by making certain acts illegal if done by men (implicitly, wasn't stated overtly) to women (was made explicitly clear). I'm not a wolf-whistler, as the site has hopefully guessed, but the idea it should be a criminal offence is crackers.
You can't base a justice system on the preferences of the most over-sensitive and easily offended people in the country. It's also indefensible to try and make misogyny a crime but not misandry (the former is still probably more commonplace but pretending the latter doesn't exist is a breathtaking example of both sexism and hypocrisy).
Not sure politicians should really give a toss about the latest ipsos MORI finding, provided they aren't differentially mistrusted. It has zero effect on the amount of power they wield.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
IF we decided to remain, there would be riots, I kid you not.
Are you saying leavers are violent thugs?
No There are enough people out there who would lose their cool if what they consider to be a democratic decision were to be thwarted. I think they would go bonkers.
Is it not likely that the increase in lack of trust in politicians/government is being driven by the fanatics on both sides either convinced that the government is going to betray Brexit by incompetence/BINO or that the government is going to betray the country by crashing into no deal chaos?
Even for those of a more moderate/indifferent point of view this has certainly not been our political class's finest hour. If this was a football match both sets of supporters would be jeering their respective managers, "you don't know what your doing". Such chants pretty much invariably lead to the sacking of the manager concerned. Who is getting sacked here?
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
IF we decided to remain, there would be riots, I kid you not.
Are you saying leavers are violent thugs?
No There are enough people out there who would lose their cool if what they consider to be a democratic decision were to be thwarted. I think they would go bonkers.
So yes, you're saying that they're violent thugs.
This is just another example of leave's very own Project Fear.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
There is no agreed view about what a Peoples' Vote would be about. Any deal with the EU won't be finalised for some years.
A general election could be a good idea if Labour were fully committed to Remain and the Conservatives to Brexit, with no rebels on either side.
Even if it was 60-40 consistently it still wouldn't matter if the Tories are in charge and their voting base is largely made up of the 40. Talking from a purely electoral point of view surely the Conservatives would still press ahead even if things look bad as the alternative may well be worse for them.
'Softer' Brexit is possible due to these factors but Brexit doesn't stop with the Conservatives in charge without major changes in the opinions of Tory voters.
For which the clusterfuck that is her majesty’s official opposition bears as much responsibility as the clusterfuck that is the government.
It would surely still be the case even if a hypothetical new Tony Blair led Labour. The Tories are in charge, their supporters are strongly supportive of Brexit, they will want to press ahead with Brexit unless those supporters (voters) views change.
Even if it was 60-40 consistently it still wouldn't matter if the Tories are in charge and their voting base is largely made up of the 40. Talking from a purely electoral point of view surely the Conservatives would still press ahead even if things look bad as the alternative may well be worse for them.
'Softer' Brexit is possible due to these factors but Brexit doesn't stop with the Conservatives in charge without major changes in the opinions of Tory voters.
I think differently. 60/40 consistently would lead to Labour backing a second referendum, and I think they'd also get the votes of a fair few Tory MPs.
I wouldn't rule that out and then because of the make up of parliament the Conservatives would be stuck (although there is a chance they already are) but even if a few Tory MPs went against it the Conservative party itself would still be pro Brexit.
It would require them falling, which is why I say if the Tories are still in charge. If Labour take power solely or part of a coalition then the calculations change but whilst the Tories remain in charge the party and government position wouldn't (IMO) move away from Brexit without a serious shift in their supporters.
Although I don't quite fully understand a situation where parliament and the government are strongly conflicted but the government doesn't fall.... and to a more obvious and critical point on Brexit consistently than it has been so far under May.
Fair enough. Well done on your use of the double quotes also!
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
We did the GE. There wasn't a majority for that either.
a. It was confirmed in multiple polls b. It was a motivator of votes, and was showing up in VI and (say) a parliamentary by-election.
Yesterday's Survation put it at 50/50 with a 2% movement towards Leave.
That was a rather unusual poll inits party political side, with UKIP up 4% and LD down 4%, and a 4% Lab lead. it looks a bit of an outlier.
Ah we can discount the polling we dislike strategy. Good one!
As someone who quite likes the poll (from a Labour perspective) I do try to take a longer term view of the polls, one poll with a dramatic change can get me interested but I won't start celebrating or wallowing until it is confirmed over a longer time period and preferably multiple different polls.
I always like the average over a few months that would get posted now and again. I would also add that whilst I don't ignore polling it isn't everything but does have its place in assessment.
The problem with poll averaging is that it involves including polls that aren't much good. But, there's probably no alternative if you want to see the big picture.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
HMG has agreed Chequers as its negotiating position.
I could imagine that a hardening of support for a 2nd referendum would in fact make leaving more likely.
Hardcore Brexiteers would have their minds focussed on getting over the exit line first and foremost rather than trying to force a TM to take a tougher stance, or even go for a no deal.
Once the UK is out the hardcore anti-EU politicians and press can start the campaign to turn the ratchet ever further away from Brussels by blaming every setback on the dead hand of the commission and our awful deal.
On the flip side if the UK outperforms you can well imagine the headlines gasping at how much better we would be doing by fully casting off the rotting carcass across the water.
I used to think that there would be a strong manifesto commitment by Labour to have a referendum on rejoining, if not at the next election then certainly the one after. I now believe we will never rejoin as it would be electoral suicide to even suggest the idea is put forward to another public vote.
Is it not likely that the increase in lack of trust in politicians/government is being driven by the fanatics on both sides either convinced that the government is going to betray Brexit by incompetence/BINO or that the government is going to betray the country by crashing into no deal chaos?
Even for those of a more moderate/indifferent point of view this has certainly not been our political class's finest hour. If this was a football match both sets of supporters would be jeering their respective managers, "you don't know what your doing". Such chants pretty much invariably lead to the sacking of the manager concerned. Who is getting sacked here?
PBs the microcosm. Partisan fanatics voicing false memes drown out the chance to have a sensible exchange of views, Eventually everyone gets tarred with the same stupidity brush.
Curtice himself thinks that his panel is skewed to Remain (it has always placed Remain ahead over the past two years) and that the correct figure is about 53/47.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
There is no agreed view about what a Peoples' Vote would be about.
It’s about stopping Brexit in its tracks.
It has been given no more thought by its proponents other than that.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
There is no agreed view about what a Peoples' Vote would be about.
It’s about stopping Brexit in its tracks.
It has been given no more thought by its proponents other than that.
Sure. Even then, a vote which saw Brexit rejected by a small margin (which is the best Remain could hope for) would scarcely settle matters.
I could imagine that a hardening of support for a 2nd referendum would in fact make leaving more likely.
Hardcore Brexiteers would have their minds focussed on getting over the exit line first and foremost rather than trying to force a TM to take a tougher stance, or even go for a no deal.
Once the UK is out the hardcore anti-EU politicians and press can start the campaign to turn the ratchet ever further away from Brussels by blaming every setback on the dead hand of the commission and our awful deal.
On the flip side if the UK outperforms you can well imagine the headlines gasping at how much better we would be doing by fully casting off the rotting carcass across the water.
I used to think that there would be a strong manifesto commitment by Labour to have a referendum on rejoining, if not at the next election then certainly the one after. I now believe we will never rejoin as it would be electoral suicide to even suggest the idea is put forward to another public vote.
There are two ways Remain could win the argument: (1) by giving Brexit a chance for a few years and then showing it has failed, leading to a rejoin campaign with caveats on the euro, or (2) by getting the EU to throw a concession or two on the table on free movement, as well as a commitment to remove ever closer union for the UK, if we agree to stay.
It cannot win by trying to sneak a technical victory before Brexit has actually taken place. Even if it did win a 2nd referendum on such a basis, it would toxify our democracy and society for decades.
Now that's getting into interesting territory. I still think March is too soon for a change of heart, but Remainers should certainly have hope, and be looking into options for a swift rejoining.
Worth reading the whole report. While there has been a swing, some of it comes from more people 'remembering' they voted Remain than actually did and for 'did not votes last time ' breaking heavily for Remain this time. When you factor all that in it comes out at 53:47 to Remain - not quite so dramatic....
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. A six point swing they reckon to 54 remain, which as you say is much less dramatic. Interesting that people should misremember the way they voted, suggests some people revising their personal history as they change their mind...
I was busy earning a modest crust for my family yesterday but I did happen to have the car radio on when Raab gave his statement to the House about how things were (not) progressing in his talks with Barnier and his steps to prepare for no deal. Even as a leaver I found it astonishingly banal and superficial about where we are, almost entirely lacking in content. There were quite a number on here who used to suggest that Raab was the next big thing. He is really not showing this at the moment.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
IF we decided to remain, there would be riots, I kid you not.
Why?
1/3rd voted Leave, 2/3rds did not. The bulk of voters were Remain or cannot-be-arsed-to-vote so only a minority are going to get so worked up to as to consider civil disobedience and most of them are in the older demographics who generally do not riot anyway. Most rioters tend to be angry YOUNG men.
I suppose there might be a glut of outraged letters in The Times. ...
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
There is no agreed view about what a Peoples' Vote would be about.
It’s about stopping Brexit in its tracks.
It has been given no more thought by its proponents other than that.
Sure. Even then, a vote which saw Brexit rejected by a small margin (which is the best Remain could hope for) would scarcely settle matters.
Or be acceptable to the EU. Would they really want a UK split 52:48 in favour of remain back with all the instability that would bring? I doubt it.
I could imagine that a hardening of support for a 2nd referendum would in fact make leaving more likely.
Hardcore Brexiteers would have their minds focussed on getting over the exit line first and foremost rather than trying to force a TM to take a tougher stance, or even go for a no deal.
Once the UK is out the hardcore anti-EU politicians and press can start the campaign to turn the ratchet ever further away from Brussels by blaming every setback on the dead hand of the commission and our awful deal.
On the flip side if the UK outperforms you can well imagine the headlines gasping at how much better we would be doing by fully casting off the rotting carcass across the water.
I used to think that there would be a strong manifesto commitment by Labour to have a referendum on rejoining, if not at the next election then certainly the one after. I now believe we will never rejoin as it would be electoral suicide to even suggest the idea is put forward to another public vote.
There are two ways Remain could win the argument: (1) by giving Brexit a chance for a few years and then showing it has failed, leading to a rejoin campaign with caveats on the euro, or (2) by getting the EU to throw a concession or two on the table on free movement, as well as a commitment to remove ever closer union for the UK, if we agree to stay.
It cannot win by trying to sneak a technical victory before Brexit has actually taken place. Even if it did win a 2nd referendum on such a basis, it would toxify our democracy and society for decades.
One of the other interesting things in Curtice is that people are less bothered by Freedom of Movement.
The current crop of politicians s certainly shoddy, feeble, deceptive and lacking in positive vision. That, however, is not new.
What is new is that the time is seen to be one that calls for a politician of strength, integrity and vision. The public are doomed to be disappointed.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
IF we decided to remain, there would be riots, I kid you not.
Are you saying leavers are violent thugs?
They will attack with a phalanx of zimmer frames.
In a stand-up fight between Remain voters v Leave voters, I reckon the whiny wimpy spineless Remainers would get a hell of a pasting.....
At first.
Then a civil war would start amongst the leavers, with one faction led by 'Walter Softy' JRM and the other by lazy buffoon Boris, with the former wanting to blow up Europe and the latter wanting anything that will give him power. As the leavers fight amongst themselves, the remain forces are decimated by laughter-induced injuries.
Mrs C, it's illogical to claim that those who didn't vote supported one side of the argument. You can just as easily add them to the Leave side. Neither makes sense. Those who chose not to vote chose not to express their view. It's a valid decision in a democracy.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
There is no agreed view about what a Peoples' Vote would be about.
It’s about stopping Brexit in its tracks.
It has been given no more thought by its proponents other than that.
Yes, it is the polar opposite of Brexit, which was particularly poorly planned for, even by those frothing for decades.
If a #peoples vote went for Remain, I would have to find my very smallest violin for the Leavers.
He's obviously got a new job with BAE. They recently over torqued bolts on HMS Forth causing them to snap so they just epoxied the bolt heads back on.
It is part of a long and glorious naval tradition dating back to wooden "coffin" ships where some of the copper nails where only the head of the nail and a fraction of the correct shaft length. Less copper used = more money "saved" (aka diverted to someone's pocket)
I don’t worry about the idea of riots if Brexit is stopped. If we have learned one thing in the last couple of years, it’s that Leavers couldn’t organise a piss-up in a brewery.
I don’t worry about the idea of riots if Brexit is stopped. If we have learned one thing in the last couple of years, it’s that Leavers couldn’t organise a piss-up in a brewery.
wow thats scary, imagine how inept the remainers who lost to them must be
Now that's getting into interesting territory. I still think March is too soon for a change of heart, but Remainers should certainly have hope, and be looking into options for a swift rejoining.
Worth reading the whole report. While there has been a swing, some of it comes from more people 'remembering' they voted Remain than actually did and for 'did not votes last time ' breaking heavily for Remain this time. When you factor all that in it comes out at 53:47 to Remain - not quite so dramatic....
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. A six point swing they reckon to 54 remain, which as you say is much less dramatic. Interesting that people should misremember the way they voted, suggests some people revising their personal history as they change their mind...
Yes, that was my though as to the shift in the underlying panel, people don't like to be wrong, so misremember what they did vote.
Part of the Conclusion from the Curtice Paper which has a 'topline' of 59:41 to Remain:
....attitudes towards whether the UK should be leaving the EU or not have, indeed, been remarkably stable. Britain is still more or less evenly divided between a body of voters who would vote Remain and another group that would vote Leave. Yet from the outset of the Brexit process support for Leave has generally proven a little less firm than that for Remain, and the difference between the willingness of the two sets of voters to vote the same way again may also have widened a little. Meanwhile, those who did not vote in 2016 are noticeably more inclined to say they would now vote Remain rather than Leave.
As a result, instead of a narrow majority in favour of leaving the EU recorded in the referendum in June, there might now be a narrow majority in favour of Remain
The Curtice study was done pre Chequers, completing early July, so may have shifted further.
Mrs C, it's illogical to claim that those who didn't vote supported one side of the argument. You can just as easily add them to the Leave side. Neither makes sense. Those who chose not to vote chose not to express their view. It's a valid decision in a democracy.
Au contraire Mr Dancer. Those who cannot be bothered to walk to the polling station are unlikely to bother about turning up for the riot either. So no civil disobedience from them or Remainers
Mrs C, it's illogical to claim that those who didn't vote supported one side of the argument. You can just as easily add them to the Leave side. Neither makes sense. Those who chose not to vote chose not to express their view. It's a valid decision in a democracy.
Quite so. Let's face it if they couldn't be bothered to vote on something as big as the EU referendum when are they going to be bothered?
There was a surprising difference between the Indyref with its astonishing 84.6% turnout and the EU referendum at 72.2%. As I commented at the time pretty much everyone in Scotland had voted by lunchtime in the Indyref with the turnout percentages not moving much thereafter. Both sides had large GOTV operations but frankly, they weren't needed.
Whilst some on here like to go on about posters and buses (especially that poster and that bus) the reality in Scotland was that there was absolutely minimal campaigning about Brexit and very little voter engagement. No one canvassed me, I saw 2 or 3 posters, all by the SNP and in favour of remain and a complete lack of buses. It may have been different elsewhere but here the difference between the two was very marked.
Part of the Conclusion from the Curtice Paper which has a 'topline' of 59:41 to Remain:
....attitudes towards whether the UK should be leaving the EU or not have, indeed, been remarkably stable. Britain is still more or less evenly divided between a body of voters who would vote Remain and another group that would vote Leave. Yet from the outset of the Brexit process support for Leave has generally proven a little less firm than that for Remain, and the difference between the willingness of the two sets of voters to vote the same way again may also have widened a little. Meanwhile, those who did not vote in 2016 are noticeably more inclined to say they would now vote Remain rather than Leave.
As a result, instead of a narrow majority in favour of leaving the EU recorded in the referendum in June, there might now be a narrow majority in favour of Remain
The Curtice study was done pre Chequers, completing early July, so may have shifted further.
Or swung back...
Yes, Chequers has been such a sucess that it is sweeping the nation like Last night of the Proms flagwaving fervor.
Mrs C, it's illogical to claim that those who didn't vote supported one side of the argument. You can just as easily add them to the Leave side. Neither makes sense. Those who chose not to vote chose not to express their view. It's a valid decision in a democracy.
Quite so. Let's face it if they couldn't be bothered to vote on something as big as the EU referendum when are they going to be bothered?
There was a surprising difference between the Indyref with its astonishing 84.6% turnout and the EU referendum at 72.2%. As I commented at the time pretty much everyone in Scotland had voted by lunchtime in the Indyref with the turnout percentages not moving much thereafter. Both sides had large GOTV operations but frankly, they weren't needed.
Whilst some on here like to go on about posters and buses (especially that poster and that bus) the reality in Scotland was that there was absolutely minimal campaigning about Brexit and very little voter engagement. No one canvassed me, I saw 2 or 3 posters, all by the SNP and in favour of remain and a complete lack of buses. It may have been different elsewhere but here the difference between the two was very marked.
It was indeed the same in the East Midlands. I did a stall in Melton, there was a Britain First Rally for Brexit in Leicester, and a few poorly attended meetings. I saw no posters anywhere in the East Midlands for either side.
It was an odd campaign, and mostly online and on telly.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
IF we decided to remain, there would be riots, I kid you not.
Why?
1/3rd voted Leave, 2/3rds did not. The bulk of voters were Remain or cannot-be-arsed-to-vote so only a minority are going to get so worked up to as to consider civil disobedience and most of them are in the older demographics who generally do not riot anyway. Most rioters tend to be angry YOUNG men.
I suppose there might be a glut of outraged letters in The Times. ...
I could imagine that a hardening of support for a 2nd referendum would in fact make leaving more likely.
Hardcore Brexiteers would have their minds focussed on getting over the exit line first and foremost rather than trying to force a TM to take a tougher stance, or even go for a no deal.
Once the UK is out the hardcore anti-EU politicians and press can start the campaign to turn the ratchet ever further away from Brussels by blaming every setback on the dead hand of the commission and our awful deal.
On the flip side if the UK outperforms you can well imagine the headlines gasping at how much better we would be doing by fully casting off the rotting carcass across the water.
I used to think that there would be a strong manifesto commitment by Labour to have a referendum on rejoining, if not at the next election then certainly the one after. I now believe we will never rejoin as it would be electoral suicide to even suggest the idea is put forward to another public vote.
There are two ways Remain could win the argument: (1) by giving Brexit a chance for a few years and then showing it has failed, leading to a rejoin campaign with caveats on the euro, or (2) by getting the EU to throw a concession or two on the table on free movement, as well as a commitment to remove ever closer union for the UK, if we agree to stay.
It cannot win by trying to sneak a technical victory before Brexit has actually taken place. Even if it did win a 2nd referendum on such a basis, it would toxify our democracy and society for decades.
One of the other interesting things in Curtice is that people are less bothered by Freedom of Movement.
You’re starting from your preferred conclusion and working backwards.
It was the top issue 2 years ago, the EU provided no answers and the challenges of mass migration haven’t gone away.
What decline in concern there has been is probably attributable either to a decline in net migration numbers and/or a belief it will now be brought under control.
HMG has agreed Chequers as its negotiating position.
It's a negotiating position for internal tory use only. It doesn't really bear any relation to external reality.
It’s the basis on which HMG is negotiating with the European Union.
Which is nice. Pity that the EU have rejected it as they were always going to do. To refer back to the OP will our politicians waste further weeks arguing in parliament about the various nuances of the rejected Chequers deal ("perhaps the EU will change their mind...") demonstrating their lack of grasp on reality?
The UK options are as they were. Rescind Article 50. Exit to EEA and work out a longer term solution at leisure, or catastrophic crash Brexit. Politically the first two have been rejected by both party leaders - crash out as the default option may politically be the least worst option in a very narrow short term reading of whats at stake (not the future of the UK, just the future of the Theresa May administration)
No wonder people are increasingly sick of politicians.
Part of the Conclusion from the Curtice Paper which has a 'topline' of 59:41 to Remain:
....attitudes towards whether the UK should be leaving the EU or not have, indeed, been remarkably stable. Britain is still more or less evenly divided between a body of voters who would vote Remain and another group that would vote Leave. Yet from the outset of the Brexit process support for Leave has generally proven a little less firm than that for Remain, and the difference between the willingness of the two sets of voters to vote the same way again may also have widened a little. Meanwhile, those who did not vote in 2016 are noticeably more inclined to say they would now vote Remain rather than Leave.
As a result, instead of a narrow majority in favour of leaving the EU recorded in the referendum in June, there might now be a narrow majority in favour of Remain
The Curtice study was done pre Chequers, completing early July, so may have shifted further.
Or swung back...
Yes, Chequers has been such a sucess that it is sweeping the nation like Last night of the Proms flagwaving fervor.
Last Night of the Proms has been taken over wholesale by Europhiles.
Anyone serious about that now goes to private organised regional proms or battle proms.
I could imagine that a hardening of support for a 2nd referendum would in fact make leaving more likely.
Hardcore Brexiteers would have their minds focussed on getting over the exit line first and foremost rather than trying to force a TM to take a tougher stance, or even go for a no deal.
Once the UK is out the hardcore anti-EU politicians and press can start the campaign to turn the ratchet ever further away from Brussels by blaming every setback on the dead hand of the commission and our awful deal.
On the flip side if the UK outperforms you can well imagine the headlines gasping at how much better we would be doing by fully casting off the rotting carcass across the water.
I used to think that there would be a strong manifesto commitment by Labour to have a referendum on rejoining, if not at the next election then certainly the one after. I now believe we will never rejoin as it would be electoral suicide to even suggest the idea is put forward to another public vote.
There are two ways Remain could win the argument: (1) by giving Brexit a chance for a few years and then showing it has failed, leading to a rejoin campaign with caveats on the euro, or (2) by getting the EU to throw a concession or two on the table on free movement, as well as a commitment to remove ever closer union for the UK, if we agree to stay.
It cannot win by trying to sneak a technical victory before Brexit has actually taken place. Even if it did win a 2nd referendum on such a basis, it would toxify our democracy and society for decades.
One of the other interesting things in Curtice is that people are less bothered by Freedom of Movement.
You’re starting from your preferred conclusion and working backwards.
It was the top issue 2 years ago, the EU provided no answers and the challenges of mass migration haven’t gone away.
What decline in concern there has been is probably attributable either to a decline in net migration numbers and/or a belief it will now be brought under control.
Just reporting the interesting and consistent trend in Curtice.
There has been no real decline in numbers immigrating, just a change to non EU immigrants, mostly from Asia and Africa.
I could imagine that a hardening of support for a 2nd referendum would in fact make leaving more likely.
Hardcore Brexiteers would have their minds focussed on getting over the exit line first and foremost rather than trying to force a TM to take a tougher stance, or even go for a no deal.
TMay should be explicitly using this as leverage: ERG don't want to vote for her deal? I'll have to go fishing from votes from the SNP and Centrist-Dad Labour. Apparently they want a new referendum in return, as you know I don't want to hold one but if you leave me no option...
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
IF we decided to remain, there would be riots, I kid you not.
Why?
1/3rd voted Leave, 2/3rds did not. The bulk of voters were Remain or cannot-be-arsed-to-vote so only a minority are going to get so worked up to as to consider civil disobedience and most of them are in the older demographics who generally do not riot anyway. Most rioters tend to be angry YOUNG men.
I suppose there might be a glut of outraged letters in The Times. ...
That’s astonishingly complacent.
Perhaps you are right. Given the threats of violence from various Leavers maybe we should be arming ourselves to the teeth....
With the Tory and Labour leaderships knee-deep in nostalgia, xenophobia and anti-Semitism, all the forward-kooking, interesting ideas are coming from the centre-left.
The last tweet in the header is interesting. Concern about Brexit is lowest in the Remain voting London and Scotland (NI not shown) and highest in the SE and SW, amongst older people, but mostly in the AB groups. It remains a Tory internal scrap, with just 52% of Labour voters mentioning it.
Tories own Brexit. It will be their dead albatross hanging around their neck, like a giant chunky Theresa May necklace.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
There is no agreed view about what a Peoples' Vote would be about.
It’s about stopping Brexit in its tracks.
It has been given no more thought by its proponents other than that.
Yes, it is the polar opposite of Brexit, which was particularly poorly planned for, even by those frothing for decades.
If a #peoples vote went for Remain, I would have to find my very smallest violin for the Leavers.
Mrs C, it's illogical to claim that those who didn't vote supported one side of the argument. You can just as easily add them to the Leave side. Neither makes sense. Those who chose not to vote chose not to express their view. It's a valid decision in a democracy.
Quite so. Let's face it if they couldn't be bothered to vote on something as big as the EU referendum when are they going to be bothered?
There was a surprising difference between the Indyref with its astonishing 84.6% turnout and the EU referendum at 72.2%. As I commented at the time pretty much everyone in Scotland had voted by lunchtime in the Indyref with the turnout percentages not moving much thereafter. Both sides had large GOTV operations but frankly, they weren't needed.
Whilst some on here like to go on about posters and buses (especially that poster and that bus) the reality in Scotland was that there was absolutely minimal campaigning about Brexit and very little voter engagement. No one canvassed me, I saw 2 or 3 posters, all by the SNP and in favour of remain and a complete lack of buses. It may have been different elsewhere but here the difference between the two was very marked.
ah I miss the days of Indyref when our english friends on PB used to laugh at the scots for being batshit crazy celts and banging on and on and on about the same old things.
It doesn't matter how many polls haver remain in front. We are leaving , end of story.
Though if there has been a genuine movement in opinion against Brexit leaving anyway does provide its own challenge to British democracy.
There's no majority for Chequers, WTO, Canada, Norway or Crash Out. The UK doesn't have an agreed negotiating position, what option is there except a new 'People's Vote' or a General Election?
There is no agreed view about what a Peoples' Vote would be about. Any deal with the EU won't be finalised for some years.
A general election could be a good idea if Labour were fully committed to Remain and the Conservatives to Brexit, with no rebels on either side.
You're missing the point, given that there's no majority for any of the suggested plans, the only way out is to throw the decision back to the people - but this time with a much less vague question.
Mrs C, born today about eighteen and a half centuries ago
Although it does sound like a name that could belong to a Mogg, though one suspects Septimius' brand of competent ruthlessness (a bit like an ancient Francis Urquhart) might not endear him to the Moggs.
Comments
https://whatukthinks.org/eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/WUKT-EU-Briefing-Paper-14-July-18-Analysis-paper_v3.pdf
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-45400994
a. It was confirmed in multiple polls
b. It was a motivator of votes, and was showing up in VI and (say) a parliamentary by-election.
The Curtice poll is a striking result, though surely repeatedly polling the same group means that they pay much closer attention to the issues tha the general public ?
The research is based on repeated interviews with the same 2,048 people and compares their answers to questions on the same issues over the past
It is, however, around the level of opini9n which ought to make a second referendum a democratic necessity.
'Softer' Brexit is possible due to these factors but Brexit doesn't stop with the Conservatives in charge without major changes in the opinions of Tory voters.
The Conservative position ranges from simply walking away and pulling down the entire edifice, to remaining, via remaining but pretending not to. At the same time, Labour continue to be all things to all men. OK as a short-term ploy in order to hold things up in the polls, but certainly no use at all in a general election.
It is no wonder that there is distrust of these equivocal politicians.
Tories getting more riled at Chequers/Labour getting more "meh..."?
It would require them falling, which is why I say if the Tories are still in charge. If Labour take power solely or part of a coalition then the calculations change but whilst the Tories remain in charge the party and government position wouldn't (IMO) move away from Brexit without a serious shift in their supporters.
Although I don't quite fully understand a situation where parliament and the government are strongly conflicted but the government doesn't fall.... and to a more obvious and critical point on Brexit consistently than it has been so far under May.
And Mr Glenn's headline told the full story, which sadly it does not. Curtice says its now 53:47 to Remain.
Last week the ISS suffered a pressurisation issue when a docked Soyuz module developed a leak. At the time it was reported to be the result of a micrometeorite or debris impact, but it now appears to have been a manufacturing defect: someone drilled a hole in the wrong place, and filled it with epoxy.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2018/09/russian-space-chief-vows-to-find-full-name-of-technician-who-caused-iss-leak/
I'm particularly bemused by the following quote about a previous incident:
"“I have conducted investigations of all kinds of spacecraft, and after landing, we discovered a hole drilled completely through the hull of a re-entry module," the former Energia employee, Viktor Minenko, said in Gazeta.RU. "But the technician didn't report the defect to anyone but sealed up the hole with epoxy. We found the person, and after a commotion he was terminated,” said Minenko."
'Terminated' in the Russian space industry might not mean fired from his job...
This should only encourage NASA to speed up Boeing and SpaceX's modules, even if Musk is acting like an absolute childish a$$.
....attitudes towards whether the UK should be leaving the EU or not have, indeed, been remarkably stable. Britain is still more or less evenly divided between a body of voters who would vote Remain and another group that would vote Leave. Yet from the outset of the Brexit process support for Leave has generally proven a little less firm than that for Remain, and the difference between the willingness of the two sets of voters to vote the same way again may also have widened a little. Meanwhile, those who did not vote in 2016 are noticeably more inclined to say they would now vote Remain rather than Leave.
As a result, instead of a narrow majority in favour of leaving the EU recorded in the referendum in June, there might now be a narrow majority in favour of Remain
I always like the average over a few months that would get posted now and again. I would also add that whilst I don't ignore polling it isn't everything but does have its place in assessment.
But it is rather out of line with other polls.
Not a very surprising stat but noteworthy nevertheless.
Mr. Jessop, pretty serious mistake to make. Although not worthy of termination. One hopes he only lost his job.
Saw on the news last night the idiotic proposal to enshrine sexism in law by making certain acts illegal if done by men (implicitly, wasn't stated overtly) to women (was made explicitly clear). I'm not a wolf-whistler, as the site has hopefully guessed, but the idea it should be a criminal offence is crackers.
You can't base a justice system on the preferences of the most over-sensitive and easily offended people in the country. It's also indefensible to try and make misogyny a crime but not misandry (the former is still probably more commonplace but pretending the latter doesn't exist is a breathtaking example of both sexism and hypocrisy).
*sighs*
Even for those of a more moderate/indifferent point of view this has certainly not been our political class's finest hour. If this was a football match both sets of supporters would be jeering their respective managers, "you don't know what your doing". Such chants pretty much invariably lead to the sacking of the manager concerned. Who is getting sacked here?
The politicos have spent so much time pratting about with their own interests theyve forgotten the day job.
This is just another example of leave's very own Project Fear.
A general election could be a good idea if Labour were fully committed to Remain and the Conservatives to Brexit, with no rebels on either side.
Hardcore Brexiteers would have their minds focussed on getting over the exit line first and foremost rather than trying to force a TM to take a tougher stance, or even go for a no deal.
Once the UK is out the hardcore anti-EU politicians and press can start the campaign to turn the ratchet ever further away from Brussels by blaming every setback on the dead hand of the commission and our awful deal.
On the flip side if the UK outperforms you can well imagine the headlines gasping at how much better we would be doing by fully casting off the rotting carcass across the water.
I used to think that there would be a strong manifesto commitment by Labour to have a referendum on rejoining, if not at the next election then certainly the one after. I now believe we will never rejoin as it would be electoral suicide to even suggest the idea is put forward to another public vote.
Curtice himself thinks that his panel is skewed to Remain (it has always placed Remain ahead over the past two years) and that the correct figure is about 53/47.
It has been given no more thought by its proponents other than that.
It cannot win by trying to sneak a technical victory before Brexit has actually taken place. Even if it did win a 2nd referendum on such a basis, it would toxify our democracy and society for decades.
1/3rd voted Leave, 2/3rds did not. The bulk of voters were Remain or cannot-be-arsed-to-vote so only a minority are going to get so worked up to as to consider civil disobedience and most of them are in the older demographics who generally do not riot anyway. Most rioters tend to be angry YOUNG men.
I suppose there might be a glut of outraged letters in The Times. ...
What is new is that the time is seen to be one that calls for a politician of strength, integrity and vision. The public are doomed to be disappointed.
Then a civil war would start amongst the leavers, with one faction led by 'Walter Softy' JRM and the other by lazy buffoon Boris, with the former wanting to blow up Europe and the latter wanting anything that will give him power. As the leavers fight amongst themselves, the remain forces are decimated by laughter-induced injuries.
If a #peoples vote went for Remain, I would have to find my very smallest violin for the Leavers.
Die schreienden Adler has a ring to it
http://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/deutschland-will-briten-die-einbuergerung-leichter-machen-15772222.html
There was a surprising difference between the Indyref with its astonishing 84.6% turnout and the EU referendum at 72.2%. As I commented at the time pretty much everyone in Scotland had voted by lunchtime in the Indyref with the turnout percentages not moving much thereafter. Both sides had large GOTV operations but frankly, they weren't needed.
Whilst some on here like to go on about posters and buses (especially that poster and that bus) the reality in Scotland was that there was absolutely minimal campaigning about Brexit and very little voter engagement. No one canvassed me, I saw 2 or 3 posters, all by the SNP and in favour of remain and a complete lack of buses. It may have been different elsewhere but here the difference between the two was very marked.
Admittedly, against it, but let's not quibble.
It was an odd campaign, and mostly online and on telly.
It was the top issue 2 years ago, the EU provided no answers and the challenges of mass migration haven’t gone away.
What decline in concern there has been is probably attributable either to a decline in net migration numbers and/or a belief it will now be brought under control.
The UK options are as they were. Rescind Article 50. Exit to EEA and work out a longer term solution at leisure, or catastrophic crash Brexit. Politically the first two have been rejected by both party leaders - crash out as the default option may politically be the least worst option in a very narrow short term reading of whats at stake (not the future of the UK, just the future of the Theresa May administration)
No wonder people are increasingly sick of politicians.
https://twitter.com/ShippersUnbound/status/1037228105591652354
Anyone serious about that now goes to private organised regional proms or battle proms.
There has been no real decline in numbers immigrating, just a change to non EU immigrants, mostly from Asia and Africa.
(Shakes head in despair)
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/sep/05/thinktank-calls-for-major-overhaul-of-britains-economy
https://news.sky.com/story/sky-data-poll-public-ready-for-change-as-uk-economy-is-unfair-and-not-working-11490328
With the Tory and Labour leaderships knee-deep in nostalgia, xenophobia and anti-Semitism, all the forward-kooking, interesting ideas are coming from the centre-left.
There was a chap who knew how to be both fox and lion, as Machiavelli wrote.
Tories own Brexit. It will be their dead albatross hanging around their neck, like a giant chunky Theresa May necklace.
plus ca change
Although it does sound like a name that could belong to a Mogg, though one suspects Septimius' brand of competent ruthlessness (a bit like an ancient Francis Urquhart) might not endear him to the Moggs.