Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The danger for LAB is that its equivocation over Brexit could

24

Comments

  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,403
    Charles said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    Do you have anyway to judge the extent to which that was because he “couldn’t win”?
    No. But the people seemed furious (bear in mind they were middle class, metropolitan elite, probably luvvies, many in big houses). I didn't get the feeling that it was a calculated push but be careful how much we push move.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    Agreed - the assumption that because Labour did better than expected last time they will do even better next time is one huge dose of wishful thinking. It is equally possible that we have reached and maybe passed peak Corbyn. With a different leader of course - ask Tony Blair - anything is possible. :)
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,403

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    You were in a surburban marginal in Greater London?

    I didn’t get any of that down in Southampton Test. I did clearly read the canvass returns incorrectly, however.
    As I said, I've no idea whether the air is different around the country, thus producing different types of Tories but the contention was (somewhere way back) that "Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole", and it looks like hundreds if not thousands of them did just that where I was last year.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    justin124 said:

    To be fair to May though, I am not sure that the Tory Government is capable of being led by anyone at present! Attlee was never faced with a Brexit -type fissure running through his Administration. The closest he came to that was the row over NHS cuts in the wake of the Korean War in 1951 - and he only survived in office for a few months thereafter.

    It is fascinating how the tribal clings on, long after external events render it pointless.

    The new reality ought to be a Brexit Party, and a non-Brexit party.

    May and Corbyn would both be out.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125
    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    So is that why Labour won such a big overall majority... oh...wait...
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125
    More me too nonsense.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,403
    felix said:

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    So is that why Labour won such a big overall majority... oh...wait...
    In that constituency yes absolutely (your wait is over).
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Scott_P said:

    justin124 said:

    To be fair to May though, I am not sure that the Tory Government is capable of being led by anyone at present! Attlee was never faced with a Brexit -type fissure running through his Administration. The closest he came to that was the row over NHS cuts in the wake of the Korean War in 1951 - and he only survived in office for a few months thereafter.

    It is fascinating how the tribal clings on, long after external events render it pointless.

    The new reality ought to be a Brexit Party, and a non-Brexit party.

    May and Corbyn would both be out.
    No it absolutely shouldn't.

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line. What divides us will continue to be left versus right not pro or anti Brexit. Brexit will happen and life will move on.
  • Options
    El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 3,878
    TOPPING said:

    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.

    Tory, Nul Points.

    Oh, sorry, that's a bit too European for the modern Conservative Party.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    TOPPING said:

    felix said:

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    So is that why Labour won such a big overall majority... oh...wait...
    In that constituency yes absolutely (your wait is over).
    Which constituency was it out of curiosity? I'd be curious to see how much the Tory vote fell by in that constituency.

    Labour lost by less than forecast not by winning over Tories but by hoovering up the non-Tories.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    48% didn’t vote for it. That doesn’t mean they don’t want it now
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,618
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/07/03/vip-paedophile-accuser-nick-charged-perverting-course-justice/

    Credible and true, they said. Tom Watson should be sacked for this farce and pay the full £2.5m cost of the investigation.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    Bollocks.

    When 7.9% (at the last count) are willing to vote for an anti-Brexit party, that's not a divide.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,534
    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,125
    TOPPING said:

    felix said:

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    So is that why Labour won such a big overall majority... oh...wait...
    In that constituency yes absolutely (your wait is over).
    The air is indeed special wherever you are...
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,534
    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    You were in a surburban marginal in Greater London?

    I didn’t get any of that down in Southampton Test. I did clearly read the canvass returns incorrectly, however.
    As I said, I've no idea whether the air is different around the country, thus producing different types of Tories but the contention was (somewhere way back) that "Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole", and it looks like hundreds if not thousands of them did just that where I was last year.
    Clearly in certain places that was true.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,563
    edited July 2018
    Based on what I've heard from experienced campaigners the 2017 targeting data from Jim Messina was awful in places and most unlike 2015.

    I'm not surprised that Topping had his experiences.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,128
    edited July 2018

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
    The last YouGov poll has 19% strongly approving of EU membership and 20% strongly disapproving. That's a lot of people in the middle who are potential swing voters in a second referendum.

    http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/hit82jf794/HandelsblattResults_June18_Topline_client_w.pdf
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,403
    edited July 2018

    TOPPING said:

    felix said:

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    fine
    I kear.
    Yes texit
    Wry.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    So is that why Labour won such a big overall majority... oh...wait...
    In that constituency yes absolutely (your wait is over).
    Which constituency was it out of curiosity? I'd be curious to see how much the Tory vote fell by in that constituency.

    Labour lost by less than forecast not by winning over Tories but by hoovering up the non-Tories.
    Ealing Central and Acton.

    Cons vote fell by 2,500. Turnout up 4,500, Lab vote up by 11,000, registered electors down by 2,800.

    Let's assume Greens and Kippers (2,000 apiece, didn't stand) went Lab and Cons respectively. Plus let's assume all those extra who voted this time went Lab. So:

    Lab = 33,000 = 22,000 + 2,000 Green + 4,500 new voters + 4,500 Cons
    Cons = 19,200 = 21,700 + 2,000 UKIP - 4,500 Cons!
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
    I doubt it's even that high. Post-Brexit Lib Dems peaked last year at 7.9% and pre-Brexit UKIP peaked at 12.6% and people have other reasons to vote for these protest parties.

    The people whose votes will be swung solely on Brexit now are probably no more than 10% if that. They'll care about Brexit while its a live issue but other issues take priority.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    I doubt it's even that high. Post-Brexit Lib Dems peaked last year at 7.9% and pre-Brexit UKIP peaked at 12.6% and people have other reasons to vote for these protest parties.

    The people whose votes will be swung solely on Brexit now are probably no more than 10% if that. They'll care about Brexit while its a live issue but other issues take priority.

    The War will be over by Christmas...
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    felix said:

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    fine
    I kear.
    Yes texit
    Wry.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    So is that why Labour won such a big overall majority... oh...wait...
    In that constituency yes absolutely (your wait is over).
    Which constituency was it out of curiosity? I'd be curious to see how much the Tory vote fell by in that constituency.

    Labour lost by less than forecast not by winning over Tories but by hoovering up the non-Tories.
    Ealing Central and Acton.

    Cons vote fell by 2,500. Turnout up 4,500, Lab vote up by 11,000, registered electors down by 2,800.

    Let's assume Greens and Kippers (2,000 apiece, didn't stand) went Lab and Cons respectively. Plus let's assume all those extra who voted this time went Lab. So:

    Lab = 33,000 = 22,000 + 2,000 Green + 4,500 new voters + 4,500 Cons
    Cons = 19,200 = 21,700 + 2,000 UKIP - 4,500 Cons!
    Interesting constituency, bucks a number of national trends. Firstly I dispute all UKIP votes went Tory, that was never a sound assumption. UKIP votes were largely protest ones. Worth noting Tories still got more than in 2010.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986
    edited July 2018
    Post GE2017 a couple of themes emerged which looked right at first glance but actually weren't.

    i) Labour had a massive youthquake. Not to nearly the same extent as people made out
    ii) The UKIP didn't go heavily Tory as expected. It did

    I'd be very surprised if there weren't a significant number of Tory -> Lab switchers in heavily remain areas quite honestly - @Topping anecdote for EC&A seems fair enough to me. It is a neccesary piece of the jigsaw to make all the numbers fit.
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    edited July 2018
    Pulpstar said:

    Post GE2017 a couple of themes emerged which looked right at first glance but actually weren't.

    i) Labour had a massive youthquake. Not to nearly the same extent as people made out
    ii) The UKIP didn't go heavily Tory as expected. It did

    I'd be very surprised if there weren't a significant number of Tory -> Lab switchers in heavily remain areas quite honestly - @Topping anecdote for EC&A seems fair enough to me.

    There were quite a few even in heavily Leave areas. I think I had enough Lab --> Con (and UKIP --> Con) swing to win Don Valley, but couldn't contend with DNV --> Lab and Con --> Lab on top.

    Not to mention some UKIP --> Lab; as previously discussed I think I'd have been marginally better off if they'd stood. Anyone still voting UKIP was essentially anti-establishment-sod-the-lot-of-you: without a UKIP candidate on the paper they're surely most likely to vote Corbyn?
  • Options
    JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548
    Scott_P said:
    "She ignored advice was Shami Chakrabarti and ploughed on anyway"

    She whitewashed an enquiry into antisemitism during an event in Brighton?!?
  • Options
    notmenotme Posts: 3,293
    currystar said:

    As I keep saying its becasue of the economy. If unemployment was an issue then the poll results would be vastly different.

    Quite. I live in a con held con labour marginal (a gain in 2010, 2017 increased majority). Local labour seem to be falling over themselves with grunts of orgasmic delight about how the torie have put the nhs into an underfunded crisis (but big happy birthday) due to cuts and have done it on purpose because they are monsters , and and how universal credit will have everyone in poverty. Oh and the plight of fully grown women who can’t afford 60p for a pack of sanitary wear. It’s all they go on about. I assume it’s their comfort zone. But it’s a bit tedious and we’ve heard it all before.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,403

    Interesting constituency, bucks a number of national trends. Firstly I dispute all UKIP votes went Tory, that was never a sound assumption. UKIP votes were largely protest ones. Worth noting Tories still got more than in 2010.

    No idea where the Kippers went. Probably a few hundred votes either way.
  • Options
    RhubarbRhubarb Posts: 359

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
    It would be nice to get Number Cruncher Politics's rejoin question asked every quarter or so; if it remains as-is then that's probably true and we can all move on to bicker about something else. If it starts to head back towards evens then we can spend the next decade rehashing the last two years of arguments.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986



    Interesting constituency, bucks a number of national trends. Firstly I dispute all UKIP votes went Tory, that was never a sound assumption. UKIP votes were largely protest ones. Worth noting Tories still got more than in 2010.

    Not all but ~ 55 -> 60% of the 2015 UKIP vote did or so. Was between 8 -> 18% for Labour.
  • Options
    dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 27,995
    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.
  • Options
    BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 31,767
    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It shows we can read :smile:
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,291
    edited July 2018

    Scott_P said:
    "She ignored advice was Shami Chakrabarti and ploughed on anyway"

    She whitewashed an enquiry into antisemitism during an event in
    Brighton?!?
    I have no idea where people get these ideas from...

    Jeremy Corbyn's Labour is breeding 'softcore' Holocaust denial, a leading academic has warned.

    Deborah Lipstadt, who rose to prominence in a legal battle with historian David Irving in 2000 after accusing him of Holocast denial, said anti-Semitism was 'embedded' in Labour.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5913129/Corbyns-Labour-Party-breeding-softcore-Holocaust-denial-claims-leading-academic.html
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,563
    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    Because our patron saint is a Jonny Foreigner our flag is used by other countries.

    Our flag can be mistaken for the flag of Georgia so we have to put England on it to avoid confusion.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,358
    Breaking News

    CPS says a man known only as 'Nick' whose claims led to the operation Midland Paedophile Investigation in Westminster will be charged with 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one count of fraud

    Over to you Tom Watson
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986

    Pulpstar said:

    Post GE2017 a couple of themes emerged which looked right at first glance but actually weren't.

    i) Labour had a massive youthquake. Not to nearly the same extent as people made out
    ii) The UKIP didn't go heavily Tory as expected. It did

    I'd be very surprised if there weren't a significant number of Tory -> Lab switchers in heavily remain areas quite honestly - @Topping anecdote for EC&A seems fair enough to me.

    There were quite a few even in heavily Leave areas. I think I had enough Lab --> Con (and UKIP --> Con) swing to win Don Valley, but couldn't contend with DNV --> Lab and Con --> Lab on top.

    Not to mention some UKIP --> Lab; as previously discussed I think I'd have been marginally better off if they'd stood. Anyone still voting UKIP was essentially anti-establishment-sod-the-lot-of-you: without a UKIP candidate on the paper they're surely most likely to vote Corbyn?
    How much time did you split between the various bits of the constituency, did you venture out to Edlington much or prefer to spend time in Tickhill ;)
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,291
    The cult will be off on their tin foil hat stuff again, like when Jo Johnson was on QT.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,291
    edited July 2018

    Breaking News

    CPS says a man known only as 'Nick' whose claims led to the operation Midland Paedophile Investigation in Westminster will be charged with 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one count of fraud

    Over to you Tom Watson

    Its quite incredible that Watson still have a leading role in a political party, especially given we live in an environment where touching a ladies knee 20 years ago is enough to lose your job.
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Pulpstar said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Post GE2017 a couple of themes emerged which looked right at first glance but actually weren't.

    i) Labour had a massive youthquake. Not to nearly the same extent as people made out
    ii) The UKIP didn't go heavily Tory as expected. It did

    I'd be very surprised if there weren't a significant number of Tory -> Lab switchers in heavily remain areas quite honestly - @Topping anecdote for EC&A seems fair enough to me.

    There were quite a few even in heavily Leave areas. I think I had enough Lab --> Con (and UKIP --> Con) swing to win Don Valley, but couldn't contend with DNV --> Lab and Con --> Lab on top.

    Not to mention some UKIP --> Lab; as previously discussed I think I'd have been marginally better off if they'd stood. Anyone still voting UKIP was essentially anti-establishment-sod-the-lot-of-you: without a UKIP candidate on the paper they're surely most likely to vote Corbyn?
    How much time did you split between the various bits of the constituency, did you venture out to Edlington much or prefer to spend time in Tickhill ;)
    I spent the majority of my time in the "old Labour" areas - that's where the target voters were. Including breaking up a spectacular near-fight in Edlington between an ex-miner and someone delivering my leaflets: the guy was so offended to have a leaflet delivered through his door he came out and chucked it back at us even though we were 30 yards up the road by then.
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,358
    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    To upset Emily Thornberry maybe
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,727
    Charles said:

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    48% didn’t vote for it. That doesn’t mean they don’t want it now
    Same applies in opposite direction for the 52%.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,689
    All set for Sweden v Kosovo...
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,047

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    Because our patron saint is a Jonny Foreigner our flag is used by other countries.

    Our flag can be mistaken for the flag of Georgia so we have to put England on it to avoid confusion.
    Why didn't the sun set on the British Empire?

    'Cos God didn't rust the English in the dark!
  • Options
    TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It shows we can read :smile:
    I see the Emily Thornberry fan club has turned up.
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Scott_P said:

    I doubt it's even that high. Post-Brexit Lib Dems peaked last year at 7.9% and pre-Brexit UKIP peaked at 12.6% and people have other reasons to vote for these protest parties.

    The people whose votes will be swung solely on Brexit now are probably no more than 10% if that. They'll care about Brexit while its a live issue but other issues take priority.

    The War will be over by Christmas...
    Nah the war will never end but the war is between left and right.

    Brexit is a mere skirmish in comparison.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,792
    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    Well there are also Iraq and Saudi Arabia's...
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,403
    Nigelb said:

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    Well there are also Iraq and Saudi Arabia's...
    Wales?
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,792
    Recent polling on the importance of the Supreme Court nomination for the midterms:

    https://www.politico.com/story/2018/07/03/abortion-supreme-court-justice-691338
    “More than three-quarters (76 percent) of voters say their senator’s position on the ... nominee will be a very or somewhat important factor at the ballot box, including 82 percent of Democrats, 80 percent of Republicans, and 68 percent of independents.”

    Note that independents' opinions by some margin do not favour the sort of justice Trump is likely to pick.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,989

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    Because our patron saint is a Jonny Foreigner our flag is used by other countries.

    Our flag can be mistaken for the flag of Georgia so we have to put England on it to avoid confusion.
    Why didn't the sun set on the British Empire?

    'Cos God didn't rust the English in the dark!
    Yep, we're made of tougher stuff than iron!
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It's ridiculous. They're defacing the flag.
  • Options
    Harris_TweedHarris_Tweed Posts: 1,301
    I think there's a temptation to put too much store in Brexit preferences in guessing how protest votes will move.

    Feels to me like there's a large, unpredictable, emotional and probably growing Screw You Vote which can manifest itself in different ways each time (from LibDems in 2010 to UKIP mid-parliament to Brexit to Corbyn).

    Part of the unpredictability is that it's different people each time (the green left in 2010; wwc in 2016), but also that any of those groups may well change their views over time (enthusiastic supporters of hard Brexit will soon kick a government which delivers a personal economic downturn as a result).

    So.. while I agree with Mike's analysis that there are disenfranchised remainers looking for a home, I think there are dangers in applying too much logic to the swings.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986
    Nice for the Swedes to have a match at home in the world cup against Kosovo.
  • Options
    YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    Yup that is one big divide.
    Seems a bit churlish to even deny such a division.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,403
    AndyJS said:

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It's ridiculous. They're defacing the flag.
    It's a football thing. Normally they put their own area/team on it. So it is a logical extension to put "England" on it.

    i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/02/06/article-2274501-04BCD4D20000044D-511_634x418.jpg
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,534

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
    The last YouGov poll has 19% strongly approving of EU membership and 20% strongly disapproving. That's a lot of people in the middle who are potential swing voters in a second referendum.

    http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/hit82jf794/HandelsblattResults_June18_Topline_client_w.pdf
    You are obsessed.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,563
    Sweden and Switzerland fighting out for the honour of losing to England in the quarter final.

    *Hubris klaxon ends*
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,563
    TOPPING said:

    AndyJS said:

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It's ridiculous. They're defacing the flag.
    It's a football thing. Normally they put their own area/team on it. So it is a logical extension to put "England" on it.

    i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/02/06/article-2274501-04BCD4D20000044D-511_634x418.jpg
    I like the England flag that has 'BOLLOCKS' written on it.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,941
    edited July 2018
    Scott_P said:
    Good news for the Lib Dems and Conservatives of Sheffield Hallam.
    Maybe, a year after the election, their Labour MP might deign to give the House the honour of a Maiden Speech?
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    I think it's perceived as added value. How do you differentiate your flag from the dozens of other identical flags? How do you choose between dozens of identical flags?
  • Options
    JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548
    TOPPING said:

    AndyJS said:

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It's ridiculous. They're defacing the flag.
    It's a football thing. Normally they put their own area/team on it. So it is a logical extension to put "England" on it.

    i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/02/06/article-2274501-04BCD4D20000044D-511_634x418.jpg
    It's no excuse for this kind of abomination image

    What flag even is that?
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,884
    BREXIT Time is the Fav in the next race at Hamilton 6/5 i am on

    DYOR
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,563
    That Swedish striker couldn't score in a brothel
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
    The last YouGov poll has 19% strongly approving of EU membership and 20% strongly disapproving. That's a lot of people in the middle who are potential swing voters in a second referendum.

    http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/hit82jf794/HandelsblattResults_June18_Topline_client_w.pdf
    That shows precisely why there won't be one. 81% of the country are either happy with, content with or resigned to Brexit.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,403

    TOPPING said:

    AndyJS said:

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It's ridiculous. They're defacing the flag.
    It's a football thing. Normally they put their own area/team on it. So it is a logical extension to put "England" on it.

    i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/02/06/article-2274501-04BCD4D20000044D-511_634x418.jpg
    It's no excuse for this kind of abomination image

    What flag even is that?
    That is a shocker.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,128

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
    The last YouGov poll has 19% strongly approving of EU membership and 20% strongly disapproving. That's a lot of people in the middle who are potential swing voters in a second referendum.

    http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/hit82jf794/HandelsblattResults_June18_Topline_client_w.pdf
    That shows precisely why there won't be one. 81% of the country are either happy with, content with or resigned to Brexit.
    80% of the country are either opposed to Brexit or not that fussed about Brexit. That's why Brexit cannot survive any seriously disruptive events.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,002
    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,291

    That Swedish striker couldn't score in a brothel

    Maybe his problem is he has been doing too much of that...
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,137
    Who should England fans cheer for in this game?
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,713
    Press Association

    #Breaking A man known only as Nick whose claims sparked the Operation Midland paedophile investigation in Westminster will be charged with 12 counts of perverting the course of justice and one count of fraud, the Crown Prosecution Service says

    Paging Tom Watson.,paging Tom Watson
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986

    Who should England fans cheer for in this game?

    Me and @tlg86 are cheering for the Swedes. @Topping for Switzerland.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,563

    Who should England fans cheer for in this game?

    After the recent fiasco that IKEA have inflicted upon me I'm cheering for Switzerland.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,137

    Who should England fans cheer for in this game?

    After the recent fiasco that IKEA have inflicted upon me I'm cheering for Switzerland.
    I'd settle for a rush of red cards.....
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,563
    Oh yeah I backed Sweden at summat like 70s the other day.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,204

    Who should England fans cheer for in this game?

    I think England have a better chance against Switzerland. We've beaten them in qualifiers relatively recently. We have a dreadful record against Sweden.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,563
    Plus I love the country that gave the world ABBA.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,047

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].

    Savoy?
  • Options
    Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
    The last YouGov poll has 19% strongly approving of EU membership and 20% strongly disapproving. That's a lot of people in the middle who are potential swing voters in a second referendum.

    http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/hit82jf794/HandelsblattResults_June18_Topline_client_w.pdf
    That shows precisely why there won't be one. 81% of the country are either happy with, content with or resigned to Brexit.
    80% of the country are either opposed to Brexit or not that fussed about Brexit. That's why Brexit cannot survive any seriously disruptive events.
    You don't need to be fussed to accept what has happened. You need to be fussed to reverse it.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,989

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].

    On a related note, wasn’t the EU fisheries commissioner recently Austrian, that famous naval power.
  • Options
    bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 21,884

    BREXIT Time is the Fav in the next race at Hamilton 6/5 i am on

    DYOR

    Won easy in end in trouble for most of race (stewards!!)
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,128

    Scott_P said:

    Brexit is an event not a dividing line.

    Bollocks.

    When 48% (at the last count) don't want it, that's a divide.
    But, not all of those 48% feel as strongly about it as you do.

    My sense is about 25% do on the pro EU side, and about 30% on the Brexit side, and you’ve got 45% of the electorate who are somewhere in the middle and would probably rather be talking about something else.
    The last YouGov poll has 19% strongly approving of EU membership and 20% strongly disapproving. That's a lot of people in the middle who are potential swing voters in a second referendum.

    http://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/hit82jf794/HandelsblattResults_June18_Topline_client_w.pdf
    That shows precisely why there won't be one. 81% of the country are either happy with, content with or resigned to Brexit.
    80% of the country are either opposed to Brexit or not that fussed about Brexit. That's why Brexit cannot survive any seriously disruptive events.
    You don't need to be fussed to accept what has happened. You need to be fussed to reverse it.
    It hasn’t happened yet. We are talking about future events, not the past.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,047
    edited July 2018
    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    AndyJS said:

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It's ridiculous. They're defacing the flag.
    It's a football thing. Normally they put their own area/team on it. So it is a logical extension to put "England" on it.

    i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/02/06/article-2274501-04BCD4D20000044D-511_634x418.jpg
    It's no excuse for this kind of abomination image

    What flag even is that?
    That is a shocker.
    There's one locally that appears to be at half-mast. Not sure whether an octopus lives there!
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,028

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].

    Dunno but HMS Gleaner (since paid off by the Fireplace Salesman) was the last RN vessel to visit Switzerland. Spare a thought for the jacks who signed up for the fleshpots of Manila and ended up supping 10 quid coffees in Basel.
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].

    Given the period you specialise in I would suspect the Romans, but there'd be no-one for them to fight naval battles against.

    Pretty sure that old Bones-apart invaded Switzerland, so I'm going to say that it's the French, which would be kinda funny if true given their record against the British in the open ocean.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    I feel sure someone must have pointed it out, but if not, Corbyn doesn't give a jot about becoming PM. All he cares about is turning Labour into a far left party, positioning in the polls to him is irrelevant.(because he will never win and knows it.)
  • Options
    old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238

    TOPPING said:

    AndyJS said:

    dixiedean said:

    O/T. Why do so many of our flags have ENGLAND written across them?
    Other countries don't feel the need to deface their flags in such a shouty manner.

    It's ridiculous. They're defacing the flag.
    It's a football thing. Normally they put their own area/team on it. So it is a logical extension to put "England" on it.

    i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/02/06/article-2274501-04BCD4D20000044D-511_634x418.jpg
    It's no excuse for this kind of abomination image

    What flag even is that?
    It looks like a tea towel. :lol:
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,047
    RobD said:

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].

    On a related note, wasn’t the EU fisheries commissioner recently Austrian, that famous naval power.
    Wasn't Austria the major power in the defeat of the Turks at lepanto?
  • Options
    OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    RobD said:

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].

    On a related note, wasn’t the EU fisheries commissioner recently Austrian, that famous naval power.
    Still, at least they'd be neutral in disputes between the countries that do have coastlines.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,989
    edited July 2018

    RobD said:

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].

    On a related note, wasn’t the EU fisheries commissioner recently Austrian, that famous naval power.
    Wasn't Austria the major power in the defeat of the Turks at lepanto?
    When we the last time they had a Navy?

    And according to Wikipedia, they weren’t involved.
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,927
    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    HYUFD said:

    TOPPING said:

    HYUFD said:

    I doubt Jezza is remotely bothered about the anti-Brexit vote. The man is clearly itching for the hardest possible Brexit for two reasons:

    1) The resulting economic misery and chaos will see the Tories hurled from office.
    2) He can then build his socialist utopia in Britain unfettered by the neo-liberal restraints of the EU.

    He'll probably appoint Rees-Mogg and Farage to his politburo - they've been enormously helpful.

    On what basis? Hard Brexiteers would stick to the Tories but some Remainer Labour voters would shift LD and Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole.

    Though I agree hard Brexit would suit the socialism he wants to implement in government just fine
    I know that plenty of Remainer Tories voted for Corbyn because I canvassed 100s of them last year.
    Yes they will vote Tory to keep out Corbyn regardless of Brexit
    What are you talking about? They voted Labour at last year's GE. They didn't vote Tory. ie unTory. No Tory. Nil Tory.
    I would love to see HYUFD canvassing such people. He probably wouldn't believe the were Tory voters in the first place.
    I don't. The Tory vote went up by 2.3 million votes between 2015 and 2017. I don't believe any significant number of Tory votes switched to Corbyn.
    The doorstep never lies. Hundreds and hundreds. The constituency went from a Lab-Con marginal to a safe Lab seat. First time I've been called a nazi on the doorstep also, by a disgusted (at the thought of registering aliens) previous Cons voter.

    I haven't canvassed the entire United Kingdom (tbf like @HYUFD seems to have done) but unless the air is special down where I was I have to believe that such sentiments, if milder, exist around the country.
    You were in a surburban marginal in Greater London?

    I didn’t get any of that down in Southampton Test. I did clearly read the canvass returns incorrectly, however.
    As I said, I've no idea whether the air is different around the country, thus producing different types of Tories but the contention was (somewhere way back) that "Remainer Tories would still not touch Corbyn with a bargepole", and it looks like hundreds if not thousands of them did just that where I was last year.
    I think there are very different types of Tories. Tories in Kent or Essex are plainly very different from Tories in Ealing or Wandsworth.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,002
    King Cole, good guess but far too modern.

    Mr. Me, you're correct. Forget who they were fighting (might have been the Helvetii).
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986

    RobD said:

    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Which state has the record for winning naval battles in (what is today territory of) Switzerland?

    [NB I'm aware it's landlocked].

    On a related note, wasn’t the EU fisheries commissioner recently Austrian, that famous naval power.
    Wasn't Austria the major power in the defeat of the Turks at lepanto?
    Back when Austria included Croatia.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,941

    BREXIT Time is the Fav in the next race at Hamilton 6/5 i am on

    DYOR

    As opposed to Hamilton being the favourite for the next race in Northamptonshire at the weekend? ;)
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,986
    Lol about 5 handballs there.
This discussion has been closed.