Following what was perceived to be a success at the last general election, although Labour finished 58 seats behind, there have been few questions about the future of Jeremy Corbyn. He looks pretty secure and the biggest issue he faces is that he will be in his early 70s if the next election does take place, as planned, in 2022.
Comments
I wouldn't rule out Jess Phillips or Stella Creasy either. Neither is Corbynista, but the Labour Selectorate have never been ones to do as they are told.
She then said
'I've never been the right age to jump out of a building'
And then goes on to say use No 7 day cream with our clinically proven serum.
I was utterly appalled at the inexcusable bad taste following Grenfell.
I hope the Company is castigated and reported to the ASA
The question is: when will Labour tire of losing elections?
Out of all of those women, ideally I’d like to see Jess Philips lead Labour.
https://www.asa.org.uk/make-a-complaint.html
Thornberry would currently get my vote.
(Coincidently all 5 of the names you raised are women)
If it were, TSE would be very happy with your post!
I wonder if his birth control thoughts might have been influenced by this other Derbyshire Man who was regularly in the news in the preceeding years:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mick_Philpott
' Michael "Mick" Philpott (born 1956) is a British father who was found guilty of causing the deaths of six of his children by arson in 2012. Philpott, who had made several media appearances because of his benefits-funded lifestyle and polyamorous relationships, was sentenced to life imprisonment for their manslaughter. He had first come to prominence in the British media as a result of his large family (having fathered 17 children by various women), and his reliance on state benefits. '
As the event is so far away,Laura Pidcock could blossom and 33-1 could look very big come 2027.I trust John McDonnell's judgement and Rebecca Long-Bailey at 20-1 I might leave for the kids' inheritance.I cannot advise to do this as I do not yet have 3 reasons to do so and under OLBG rules you always gotta have 3 good reasons to part with your hard-earned,a good discipline.
Which means their next leader won't be a woman.
https://twitter.com/Moosedog23/status/954055326638198784
None of these heroic losers cast in stone on Mount Losemore however at first will be the face of a woman. Who will it be for 2027? Will it be the innumerate Diane Abbott? Or will it be Laura Pillock, ...sorry Pidcock, who declares that she would never be friends with a Tory, but expects voters in Tory marginals to vote for her.
And as this remarkable Mountain of losers and failures is built, have a thought for those of us who want to get rid of the Tories and remember the days when Labour leaders had the lap of honour AFTER they had won an election.
https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/jeremy-corbyn/news/91688/labour-mp-laura-pidcock-tories-are
As someone who wants to get rid of the Tories how did you vote in GE2017.
I know you have been asked this several times before and failed to answer.
But as one Labour man to another ......
1963 - Harold's Rise.
And who, when criticised, moaned that it was her birthday, apparently oblivious of the concept of weekends / celebrating her birthday in London / putting her constituents first.
The Laura Pidcock who claimed she could not afford to buy a house and then bought a 3-bedroom house?
That Laura Pidcock?
Yes - she seems to have all the qualities needed for being a Labour star: buckets of self-righteousness, a culture of entitlement and the necessary amount of hypocrisy.
But the reason why the “Millenials are Maoists” narrative is so tempting to the right is that if the Conservatives cannot win stable majorities among a generation that wants to own its on home, is economically liberal in general, that raises very difficult questions about either the party’s strategic abilities, the effectiveness of its policy platform or both. It feels like the right is simply getting its excuses in early: because saying “We couldn’t possibly win over this generation of leftwingers” is a lot more comforting than the real question: which is why is the British right doing so badly with a generation of economic and social liberals?
She is, however, 30 years old. She is too young to be leader next (even were JC to continue and win in 2022) so am not betting on her.
Next but one is not impossible though.
Of course her and her partner dont really need 3 bedrooms either they should make do with a tent IMO.
And she has been on holiday as well what a bloody hypocrite.
You do astound me at times Ms Cyclefree.
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2008/09/12/could-kitty-be-labours-sarah-palin/
Hardly excessive on an MP's salary.
https://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/property/lanchester/
https://twitter.com/haroldsrise/status/954104864178655232
https://twitter.com/haroldsrise/status/954106121932992513
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5105725/labour-mp-laura-pidcock-buys-home-county-durham/
Silly girl
https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/954110038142062599
She earns well over twice the average salary so moaning about not being able to buy a house was self-indulgent nonsense - and untrue.
Your party claims the moral high ground. It is nauseating when the evidence is that so many of your representatives are just as self-interested and selfish and hypocritical as the rest of us. So bloody stop it. Stop looking at the motes in others’ eyes and examine the beams in your own.
Like this - http://hurryupharry.org/2018/01/16/the-shortlisted-labour-candidate-who-shared-antisemitic-memes/ - for instance: does it make you proud to be a Labour man when fellow members write stuff like this?
Corbyn, his cronies and his proteges are the B team -with few exceptions. As the Stalinist grip on Labour tightens Labour is in danger of becoming a Friday night Marxist book club, and not a serious party of government. Laura Pidcock looks like a Maoist librarian. She may be content with that role.
There is no law to say that Labour has to be one of the two great parties competing for power at general elections. Parties can and do die. They get replaced. Ask the Liberals.
The Foreign Secretary, who met his French counterpart at an Anglo-French summit today, said it was “ridiculous” that two of the world’s biggest economies are “linked by a single railway”.
He has already championed the idea of a road tunnel under the Channel alongside the existing tunnel that carries rail passengers and freight but believes a bridge might now be an option.....
.....Mr Johnson’s hopes of a 22-mile Channel Bridge, however, proved the most eye-catching suggestion to come out of the talks. He hinted at his desire for more big Anglo-French infrastructure projects when he tweeted: “I’m especially pleased we are establishing a panel of experts to look at major projects together.
“Our economic success depends on good infrastructure and good connections. Should the Channel Tunnel be just a first step?”
Mr Johnson is understood to have told aides: “We are two of the world’s greatest economies linked by a single railway. It’s ridiculous.
“Technology is moving on all the time and there are much longer bridges elsewhere, including one that is 34 miles long in Japan.”
He believes the Channel Tunnel cannot provide the capacity which will be needed for increased tourism and trade between the two countries in future decades, and The Daily Telegraph understands that he discussed a new privately-funded bridge or tunnel link with his French counterparts.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2018/01/18/boris-johnson-calls-bridge-across-channel-saying-itsridiculous/
https://twitter.com/steve_hawkes/status/954113951297691648