Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » New polling finds that more than a third of Leave voters belie

1235»

Comments

  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822

    The danger is that, like the Brexiteers, they think that's a price worth paying or simply underestimate the price, or that they are so tied up in their own bureaucratic log-jam that they are incapable of looking after their own interests.

    The EU pushing us off a cliff of our own design would not be the result of bureaucratic failure but of political resolve.
    There are swivel-eyed ideologically-obsessed head-bangers on both sides, certainly.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,851
    For anyone betting on the donkey race:
    https://twitter.com/asabenn/status/899630096067284992
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    rcs1000 said:

    The other problem is negotiating delays clearly benefit them over us. If it is uncertain whether there will be a UK-EU FTA in place in July 2019, it will have minimal effects on EU firms' investment plans, while it might well have a meaningful effect on ours.

    For this reason, I would expect that the EU will only concede on financial services at 11:59pm on the very last day. In this way, some firms shift their presence from the UK to the EU, wven though they needn't have.

    Yes, that's true. In the most optimistic interpretation, their logically absurd negotiating position is explained by that.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,851

    The danger is that, like the Brexiteers, they think that's a price worth paying or simply underestimate the price, or that they are so tied up in their own bureaucratic log-jam that they are incapable of looking after their own interests.

    The EU pushing us off a cliff of our own design would not be the result of bureaucratic failure but of political resolve.
    There are swivel-eyed ideologically-obsessed head-bangers on both sides, certainly.
    Again this is to mistake what is taking place. It's about power, not ideology. Brexit is a direct assault on the EU by a deluded nationalist movement, and it has to defend itself.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822

    Again this is to mistake what is taking place. It's about power, not ideology. Brexit is a direct assault on the EU by a deluded nationalist movement, and it has to defend itself.

    No it really isn't. It's an exit by a country which has never been whole-heartedly signed up to the project in the first place, and which has been a drag on integration for three decades.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    TGOHF said:

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,851
    Opinium also asked this question:

    If there were another EU referendum, how would you vote?
    - Remain: 47%
    - Leave: 44%
    - Don't know: 5%

    An extraordinary lack of enthusiasm for the trek towards the sunlit uplands.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    edited August 2017

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.

    They keep saying it, but what the hell does it mean? It rather seems to me that keeping the trade advantages of having hassle-free trade with the world's fifth or sixth largest economy should be a rather important plank of the defence, but they seem to be implying that they don't care if a large chunk falls off their market.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    Opinium also asked this question:

    If there were another EU referendum, how would you vote?
    - Remain: 47%
    - Leave: 44%
    - Don't know: 5%

    An extraordinary lack of enthusiasm for the trek towards the sunlit uplands.

    But, but, but, Brexiteers keep saying the election result was over 80% leave...

    How is this possible?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,157

    Opinium also asked this question:

    If there were another EU referendum, how would you vote?
    - Remain: 47%
    - Leave: 44%
    - Don't know: 5%

    An extraordinary lack of enthusiasm for the trek towards the sunlit uplands.

    That adds up to 96%.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,885

    Again this is to mistake what is taking place. It's about power, not ideology. Brexit is a direct assault on the EU by a deluded nationalist movement, and it has to defend itself.

    No it really isn't. It's an exit by a country which has never been whole-heartedly signed up to the project in the first place, and which has been a drag on integration for three decades.
    Actually, I get the strong impression that it’s both!
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.
    Not sure any of the proposals put forward by the Uk govt put the single market at risk - feel free to point out any.
  • EssexitEssexit Posts: 1,963

    The danger is that, like the Brexiteers, they think that's a price worth paying or simply underestimate the price, or that they are so tied up in their own bureaucratic log-jam that they are incapable of looking after their own interests.

    The EU pushing us off a cliff of our own design would not be the result of bureaucratic failure but of political resolve.
    There are swivel-eyed ideologically-obsessed head-bangers on both sides, certainly.
    Again this is to mistake what is taking place. It's about power, not ideology. Brexit is a direct assault on the EU by a deluded nationalist movement, and it has to defend itself.
    The EU is a deluded nationalist movement.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    GIN1138 said:

    TGOHF said:

    Scott_P said:
    Is Vince still appearing with him on 9th September ?

    Vince wasn’t ever doing so was he? I though LD HQ had squashed that one.
    I think Sir Vince might have flirted with him for a while... But then Mike and Vince threw him under the proverbial bus in a thread on Friday...

    http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2017/08/17/calling-theresa-may-a-nazi-totally-undermines-chapmans-anti-brexit-crusade/
    Mike took him seriously at first though, just shows how desperate the Remainers are
    Whenever anybody describes an action as desperate it mean they are worried it might be effective.

    Effective Housewives!
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.
    Not sure any of the proposals put forward by the Uk govt put the single market at risk - feel free to point out any.
    The UK government continues to want all the benefits of access to the single market with none of the aspects that they find inconvenient or boring. Until they move beyond a binary cake position, they're going to make very little progress.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    isam said:

    GIN1138 said:

    TGOHF said:

    Scott_P said:
    Is Vince still appearing with him on 9th September ?

    Vince wasn’t ever doing so was he? I though LD HQ had squashed that one.
    I think Sir Vince might have flirted with him for a while... But then Mike and Vince threw him under the proverbial bus in a thread on Friday...

    http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2017/08/17/calling-theresa-may-a-nazi-totally-undermines-chapmans-anti-brexit-crusade/
    Mike took him seriously at first though, just shows how desperate the Remainers are
    Whenever anybody describes an action as desperate it mean they are worried it might be effective.

    Effective Housewives!
    Effective Dan...
  • ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133

    Again this is to mistake what is taking place. It's about power, not ideology. Brexit is a direct assault on the EU by a deluded nationalist movement, and it has to defend itself.

    No it really isn't. It's an exit by a country which has never been whole-heartedly signed up to the project in the first place, and which has been a drag on integration for three decades.
    Actually, I get the strong impression that it’s both!
    It's an exit by a country which has never been whole-heartedly signed up to the project in the first place, and which has been a drag on integration for three decades which is perceived as a direct assault on the EU by the deluded ever-closer-union zealots in Brussels and elsewhere.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    Osborne's latest - https://www.standard.co.uk/comment/comment/evening-standard-comment-a-high-price-looms-as-brexit-reality-bites-a3616306.html

    He [Davis] wrote that “both sides need to move swiftly on to discussing our future partnership and we want that to happen after the European Council in October”. So much for constructive ambiguity about what Britain needs. Read Mr Davis’s article closely, and gone is the pretence that Britain can walk away from the table. The phrase “no deal is better than a bad deal” is absent.

    Who cares about Osborne's daily bullshit?
    No one listened to him when he was CofE, why would they now he's in charge of a free paper?
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.
    Not sure any of the proposals put forward by the Uk govt put the single market at risk - feel free to point out any.
    The UK government continues to want all the benefits of access to the single market with none of the aspects that they find inconvenient or boring. .
    Or expensive, or limiting , or restrictive, or shackling etc.

    What you aren't saying is that the other countries may cotton on that the EU aint all that ?



  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    TGOHF said:

    Or expensive, or limiting , or restrictive, or shackling etc.

    What you aren't saying is that the other countries may cotton on that the EU aint all that ?

    Just imagine what German industry could achieve if it was unshackled, eh?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,851
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.
    Not sure any of the proposals put forward by the Uk govt put the single market at risk - feel free to point out any.
    The UK government continues to want all the benefits of access to the single market with none of the aspects that they find inconvenient or boring. .
    Or expensive, or limiting , or restrictive, or shackling etc.

    What you aren't saying is that the other countries may cotton on that the EU aint all that ?
    When do you expect other countries to cotton on that we're onto something?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    Political coverage in the Evening Standard is, unsurprisingly, very much improved since Osborne became editor. His leader pieces in particular are superb - the latest being a good example.

    Yeah but the downside is people getting stabbed or having acid thrown in their face in London seems to be less important news than speculation about a policy the editor doesn't like
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.
    Not sure any of the proposals put forward by the Uk govt put the single market at risk - feel free to point out any.
    The UK government continues to want all the benefits of access to the single market with none of the aspects that they find inconvenient or boring. .
    Or expensive, or limiting , or restrictive, or shackling etc.

    What you aren't saying is that the other countries may cotton on that the EU aint all that ?
    When do you expect other countries to cotton on that we're onto something?
    Well going by the lag time it took them to copy the wonders of Thatcherism , I'd say 5-7 years.

  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,486
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.
    Not sure any of the proposals put forward by the Uk govt put the single market at risk - feel free to point out any.
    Hasn't the UK government expressly said that it wants to leave the single market?

    The government could have taken a different position - which would still have been compatible with the referendum result - but chose not to. That has consequences for the UK.

    The EU did not need to make free movement of people essential to the single market or could have been more pragmatic and flexible in its application. But it made its choice - as the UK has - and the result will be disruption to our existing trading arrangements.

    God knows what will happen in the medium and long term.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,439
    edited August 2017

    Opinium also asked this question:

    If there were another EU referendum, how would you vote?
    - Remain: 47%
    - Leave: 44%
    - Don't know: 5%

    An extraordinary lack of enthusiasm for the trek towards the sunlit uplands.

    Well given Populus showed REMAIN winning by 10% on the day we actually voted to LEAVE by 4% I'm really not sure how seriously we should take that...
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    As others have said, I think he's not well.

    Clearly something has happened since this very lucid interview last month.

    http://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/james-chapman-daily-mail
    Will be fun to check back through the comments of those who supported his 'Democrats' bullshit! The usual fake news finders in here were lapping it up :lol:
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    isam said:

    Political coverage in the Evening Standard is, unsurprisingly, very much improved since Osborne became editor. His leader pieces in particular are superb - the latest being a good example.

    Yeah but the downside is people getting stabbed or having acid thrown in their face in London seems to be less important news than speculation about a policy the editor doesn't like
    Oh I don't know, one of today's lead stories is "‘Hypocrite’ Sarah Harding slammed by Celebrity Big Brother fans as she appears to perform sex act on Chad Johnson", which suggests there's still a continuing healthy coverage of the prime concerns of the readership.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.

    They keep saying it, but what the hell does it mean? It rather seems to me that keeping the trade advantages of having hassle-free trade with the world's fifth or sixth largest economy should be a rather important plank of the defence, but they seem to be implying that they don't care if a large chunk falls off their market.
    Oh I completely agree that the EU's current negotiating position is self-defeating and incoherent. You can understand why on an emotional level: when your negotiating partner hasn't really moved beyond "I hate you and I want to see you die", it's hard to take a dispassionate approach. Even those Leavers who fancy themselves as more cerebral seem to have given almost no thought as to the nature of the longterm relationship that they want with an organisation that, like it or not, is likely to be a big part of the neighbourhood for the foreseeable future. That in turn encourages the EU itself to be transactional and to treat the negotiations more as an outlet for internal politics than seriously to engage with the same question in reverse. That doesn't excuse the EU's own failure on this front though.

    There's a reason why I think that a car crash Brexit is more likely than not. Neither side has given any thought to what it actually wants that is achievable and stable in the long term.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,849
    For the first time ever I had a shred of empathy with the Leavers on Saturday. Due to a bungled fuel calculation we were forced to make a technical stop at the Thurrock services on the M25. In the car park there was a Ukranian sex trafficking operation in a van making a pit stop and an African wedding party that looked more like a circus act. Inside it was overrun with pikeys from east of the Oder and lakes of piss abounded on the toilet floors.

    Where I of limited intellectual capacity and a timorous disposition I could easily feel that the country has changed and not for the better. Subsequently a cleansing act of self harm like Brexit might be just the thing to cheer me up.
  • EssexitEssexit Posts: 1,963
    Dura_Ace said:

    For the first time ever I had a shred of empathy with the Leavers on Saturday. Due to a bungled fuel calculation we were forced to make a technical stop at the Thurrock services on the M25. In the car park there was a Ukranian sex trafficking operation in a van making a pit stop and an African wedding party that looked more like a circus act. Inside it was overrun with pikeys from east of the Oder and lakes of piss abounded on the toilet floors.

    Where I of limited intellectual capacity and a timorous disposition I could easily feel that the country has changed and not for the better. Subsequently a cleansing act of self harm like Brexit might be just the thing to cheer me up.

    Oh the irony. Calling Leave voters thick and you can't spell 'were' or hyphenate 'self-harm'.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    It appears that Leavers are going to persist in the "German car makers insisting" delusion up to and including the moment when it all falls apart, in the teeth of all available evidence.

    Then they will no doubt blame the German car makers for not living up to their own delusion.

    A no deal hard Brexit would be good or neutral for German car makers ?

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.
    Not sure any of the proposals put forward by the Uk govt put the single market at risk - feel free to point out any.
    The UK government continues to want all the benefits of access to the single market with none of the aspects that they find inconvenient or boring. .
    Or expensive, or limiting , or restrictive, or shackling etc.

    What you aren't saying is that the other countries may cotton on that the EU aint all that ?



    I don't think you've got the idea of a trade-off. It doesn't just mean taking the bits you like.

    Incidentally, at the moment enthusiasm for the EU seems to be increasing elsewhere in the EU:

    http://www.politico.eu/article/forget-brexit-citizens-♥-eu-survey/?utm_content=buffer2b4f4&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
  • ReggieCideReggieCide Posts: 4,312
    Essexit said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    For the first time ever I had a shred of empathy with the Leavers on Saturday. Due to a bungled fuel calculation we were forced to make a technical stop at the Thurrock services on the M25. In the car park there was a Ukranian sex trafficking operation in a van making a pit stop and an African wedding party that looked more like a circus act. Inside it was overrun with pikeys from east of the Oder and lakes of piss abounded on the toilet floors.

    Where I of limited intellectual capacity and a timorous disposition I could easily feel that the country has changed and not for the better. Subsequently a cleansing act of self harm like Brexit might be just the thing to cheer me up.

    Oh the irony. Calling Leave voters thick and you can't spell 'were' or hyphenate 'self-harm'.
    Running out of fuel is none too clever either.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,486

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.

    They keep saying it, but what the hell does it mean? It rather seems to me that keeping the trade advantages of having hassle-free trade with the world's fifth or sixth largest economy should be a rather important plank of the defence, but they seem to be implying that they don't care if a large chunk falls off their market.
    Even those Leavers who fancy themselves as more cerebral seem to have given almost no thought as to the nature of the longterm relationship that they want with an organisation that, like it or not, is likely to be a big part of the neighbourhood for the foreseeable future.
    There's a thread header (or two) right there.....
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited August 2017
    Dura_Ace said:

    For the first time ever I had a shred of empathy with the Leavers on Saturday. Due to a bungled fuel calculation we were forced to make a technical stop at the Thurrock services on the M25. In the car park there was a Ukranian sex trafficking operation in a van making a pit stop and an African wedding party that looked more like a circus act. Inside it was overrun with pikeys from east of the Oder and lakes of piss abounded on the toilet floors.

    Where I of limited intellectual capacity and a timorous disposition I could easily feel that the country has changed and not for the better. Subsequently a cleansing act of self harm like Brexit might be just the thing to cheer me up.

    Top trolling! ;)
  • ReggieCideReggieCide Posts: 4,312
    Cyclefree said:

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.

    They keep saying it, but what the hell does it mean? It rather seems to me that keeping the trade advantages of having hassle-free trade with the world's fifth or sixth largest economy should be a rather important plank of the defence, but they seem to be implying that they don't care if a large chunk falls off their market.
    Even those Leavers who fancy themselves as more cerebral seem to have given almost no thought as to the nature of the longterm relationship that they want with an organisation that, like it or not, is likely to be a big part of the neighbourhood for the foreseeable future.
    There's a thread header (or two) right there.....
    Do any of them include pomposity?
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Cyclefree said:

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.

    They keep saying it, but what the hell does it mean? It rather seems to me that keeping the trade advantages of having hassle-free trade with the world's fifth or sixth largest economy should be a rather important plank of the defence, but they seem to be implying that they don't care if a large chunk falls off their market.
    Even those Leavers who fancy themselves as more cerebral seem to have given almost no thought as to the nature of the longterm relationship that they want with an organisation that, like it or not, is likely to be a big part of the neighbourhood for the foreseeable future.
    There's a thread header (or two) right there.....
    I'm consciously trying to avoid Brexit for a little while in favour of other themes. I may not always resist though.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,439

    Essexit said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    For the first time ever I had a shred of empathy with the Leavers on Saturday. Due to a bungled fuel calculation we were forced to make a technical stop at the Thurrock services on the M25. In the car park there was a Ukranian sex trafficking operation in a van making a pit stop and an African wedding party that looked more like a circus act. Inside it was overrun with pikeys from east of the Oder and lakes of piss abounded on the toilet floors.

    Where I of limited intellectual capacity and a timorous disposition I could easily feel that the country has changed and not for the better. Subsequently a cleansing act of self harm like Brexit might be just the thing to cheer me up.

    Oh the irony. Calling Leave voters thick and you can't spell 'were' or hyphenate 'self-harm'.
    Running out of fuel is none too clever either.
    Looks like Remainiacs are running on empty now... ;)
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,851
    Global Ireland:

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/varadkar-pledges-to-increase-ireland-s-diplomatic-force-1.3193324

    In his speech, Mr Varadkar said he wanted to outline “Ireland’s place in the world in the years ahead” and sought to cast his announcement as a major statement on Ireland’s future foreign policy.

    “Ireland is emerging from what has been a lost decade for many of our citizens, and it is clear to me that we are emerging with a greater sense of self-confidence and ambition for what we can do as a country,” he said.

    “That national self-confidence requires that we always be ambitious, visible and active in promoting the interests of our nation on the international stage.”

    He said to fulfil the ambition of Ireland as “an island at the centre of the world…we need to greatly increase our international presence”.The Taoiseach said that “some nations have lost their sense of place and self-confidence in this inter dependent world of ours” but added that Ireland and Canada “retain a strong and deep commitment to openness, multilateralism, individual freedom and free trade”.
  • NEW THREAD

  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,111

    Cyclefree said:

    Their top priority is, so they say, defending the single market:

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jul/08/german-industry-warns-uk-over-brexit
    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/785168/Angela-Merkel-European-Union-interests-ahead-of-German-carmakers-BMW-VW-Brexit-Article-50

    They keep saying it. For some reason Leavers don't seem to be able to absorb it though.

    They keep saying it, but what the hell does it mean? It rather seems to me that keeping the trade advantages of having hassle-free trade with the world's fifth or sixth largest economy should be a rather important plank of the defence, but they seem to be implying that they don't care if a large chunk falls off their market.
    Even those Leavers who fancy themselves as more cerebral seem to have given almost no thought as to the nature of the longterm relationship that they want with an organisation that, like it or not, is likely to be a big part of the neighbourhood for the foreseeable future.
    There's a thread header (or two) right there.....
    I'm consciously trying to avoid Brexit for a little while in favour of other themes. I may not always resist though.
    So you think Sarah Harding did actually have sex on CBB?
This discussion has been closed.