Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » June 8th 2017 is a day that the election predictor/modellers w

12346

Comments

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,298
    Mr Dancer.

    It is a concern about bad practice/lack of supervision/bad procedures/no oversight.

    Put it this way some or all of the above could impact the Euro, businesses in the Eurozone (as William Glenn noted below)

    This could also lead to interest rates being forced to rise to support a currency.

    Would you be happy if the reverse applied to the UK?
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,242
    glw said:

    After WW2 UK debt was 250% of GDP. How did Labour reduce it? By SPENDING on homes, NHS, public services

    Austerity doesnt work


    Things were (rightly) very austere in the 1940s under Labour.

    We didn't waste money on things like Starbucks or eating out. Make do and mend era.
    Rationing didn't even end until the 1950s. The idea that the post-war years were anything other than bloody hard is ludicrous.
    The post war Labour government ran surpluses from 1947.
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506
    Scott_P said:

    FF43 said:

    The logic of less Brexit being good is that no Brexit is even better.

    That's the killer line.

    It was always true that no Brexit is better than any Brexit, but the headbangers wanted it anyway.

    Meanwhile, Farage is apparently unhappy about the current state of Brexit.

    Shame.
    Unleash the Farage.
  • Options

    I'm amazed at how quickly some posters can confidently diagnose the underlying causes while this awful fire is still burning.

    I'm very confident that it will be a number of factors that caused it.
  • Options
    atia2atia2 Posts: 207
    edited June 2017

    We don't have to vote for misery. The war against dignity has been waged by that fucker Dacre aided and abetted by that fucker Duncan Smith. I don't care about "we can't afford it" arguments - we can't afford NOT to treat people with compassion and dignity because very soon it will be us that are old and ill and demented and I don't want to be treated like shit as this generation has been.

    to me its very simple. Too many Conservatives has lost their mind. Utterly disconnected from what this country represents, utterly divorced from understanding of people less fortunate than themselves. Its not the party thats to blame, just the sociopathic wing who preach Christian Values whilst stomping their boot on the throat of the disabled because they're "scroungers".

    You sound deranged.
    I'd say angry but plausible. There is undoubtedly a large helping of anti-empiricist no-government ideology in the Conservative party. Apart from the bad language, where's the derangement?

    You sound complacent.
  • Options
    SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 20,581
    Tim Farron must be kicking himself. If only he had said that gay sex IS a sin, Tezzie would have invited him round to Number 10 to write the Queen's Speech.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453

    it is blatantly obvious now that there was never any plan, on any side,as to what to do if Leave won.

    But Gove told us that we have had enough of experts.

    Wing it, wins the day...
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    I'm amazed at how quickly some posters can confidently diagnose the underlying causes while this awful fire is still burning.

    I'm very confident that it will be a number of factors that caused it.
    I'd defer to you on such matters, obviously. There's obviously going to need to be an extremely thorough inquiry.
  • Options
    nigel4englandnigel4england Posts: 4,800

    OK I have a ridiculous theory, after you have read this you will understand why I only got an O Level pass in economics.

    In regard to tax surely the only thing that matters is the tax take, not the tax rate.

    I propose to abandon all forms of tax apart from VAT.

    Scrap Income tax, corporation tax, NI contributions both employer and employee, maybe not council tax but it would be on the table. All indirect taxation such as P11d, insurance premium tax etc to go as well

    Increase VAT to 25%, possibly even 30%, for all apart from those on low incomes/unemployed/disability benefits. This would be easy to do with a simple card, if I can pay for something by waving my phone at a PDQ then this would be easy to implement.

    All (well almost all) of that extra money in peoples pockets and on companies bottom line would filter it's way back into the economy, would create more and better paid jobs and allow for better public services. Auto enrolment has ensured companies and employees have to pay into a pension, now they could increase the level of payment so that in years to come the state pension would not be necessary.

    I wonder how much tax could be raised by this, more to the point what would the total tax take be? All those billions currently offshore would come back, no more tax dodging, the economy would be awash with money.

    I suspect (!) there is an obvious flaw in my plan and no doubt you lot will take great delight in pointing it out to me, but I would vote for me!

    Not so much Laffer Curve as Laffer Flatearth!

    VAT is 20% currently. Even assuming no change in buying habits, it woudl need to go up Waaaaaaay more than to 30% to replace ALL TAXES

    It would be cheaper to drive to Calais once a month to do grocery shopping in your world. For anyone north of about...oooh...Leeds
    That could be overcome by something akin to a duty free allowance.

    Why would you assume no change in buying habits, people would have vast amounts more to spend and would gleefully do so.

    Many thanks for the reply though, I am open to a few tweaks before I put it to the country.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    After WW2 UK debt was 250% of GDP. How did Labour reduce it? By SPENDING on homes, NHS, public services

    Austerity doesnt work

    There was an awful lot of austerity after WWII, and rationing of food lasted until the mid-1950s.

    Plus Labour had to cut back on the NHS to fund defence.
    The post war government was ruthless about cutting spending to try and run a surplus to pay down the debt.
    And, it took us almost 60 years to pay it off.
  • Options
    macisbackmacisback Posts: 382

    After WW2 UK debt was 250% of GDP. How did Labour reduce it? By SPENDING on homes, NHS, public services

    Austerity doesnt work

    Do you ever post anything that isn't the latest Momentum soundbite. Come on how about some original thought, not long after WW2 began the long slow decline of the nation anyway, brought to a head in the days you want to go back to the late 70's.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267
    619 said:

    TOPPING said:

    atia2 said:

    TOPPING said:

    atia2 said:



    Concerning, and not surprising.

    First world country?

    We can't afford the Fire Brigade. Or Police. Or Hospitals. Or Armed Forces. Or Human Dignity. We have to live within our means. With the emphasis on mean.

    We choose it @RochdalePioneers. Sorry but we do.
    This is trivially true. You can close down every policy argument by noting that we chose the current policies. It's not particularly illuminating.
    How else would you describe our political system? We vote for the one we want. Is it a dreadful way to do things? Yep. Is it the least bad of the alternatives? Yep.
    We don't have to vote for misery. The war against dignity has been waged by that fucker Dacre aided and abetted by that fucker Duncan Smith. I don't care about "we can't afford it" arguments - we can't afford NOT to treat people with compassion and dignity because very soon it will be us that are old and ill and demented and I don't want to be treated like shit as this generation has been.

    to me its very simple. Too many Conservatives has lost their mind. Utterly disconnected from what this country represents, utterly divorced from understanding of people less fortunate than themselves. Its not the party thats to blame, just the sociopathic wing who preach Christian Values whilst stomping their boot on the throat of the disabled because they're "scroungers".
    I think you need to calm down.

    Your posts are highly emotional and increasingly irrational. The Conservatives are trying to put the country on a sustainable footing.
    Dacre is definitely not doing that. The Tories do enable and play to a feeling that he endengers, and are very much in hoc to him and murdoch's toxic viewpoint.

    Despite his other faults, Corbyn does not play to the tune of Murdoch or Dacre. To his credit.
    Where such sentiments end is lauding Corbyn as a saint and personally abusing those who disagree as evil.
  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Potentially. But then every terrorist attack is supposed to be a watershed moment as attitudes stiffen to combat radical Islam. Yet nothing happens. It is hard to shock society these days, new events overtake old events and after the minute silence everyone other than those involved in the tragedy move on to something else.

    I have relatives coming over to London from Australia for my wedding in a few weeks. As a Londoner I'm embarrassed of how our City appears to the world, and to an extent the country as a whole. What a mess we find ourselves in.
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256

    After WW2 UK debt was 250% of GDP. How did Labour reduce it? By SPENDING on homes, NHS, public services

    Austerity doesnt work

    Did we really increase spending compared to paying for a 5million strong Armed Forces and the war economy backing that up?

    And rebuilding places reduced to rubble? I'm not sure comparing 2017 to 1945 is all that useful.
    I posted on here yesterday that reducing the armed forces to that needed to defend the UK's waters and airspace could be considered as an option. Oversea military adventures cost a lost of money and a lot of our soldiers get badly injured.

    In predictable fashion, I got told off for even suggesting it.
    You didn't get told off, but I did disagree with you.

    Reflecting on your points from yesterday and before, I think the political differences between you and me are now so large as to be unbridgeable.

    Shame, but thank you for replying.
    Indeed. I see the UK as being more stable within the EU, less stable on its own. If we pool our resources with the EU we can get economies of scale and consequent cost reductions. Companies and businesses have a more predictable environment and we give foreign companies a reason to invest here because of our language and culture making us an easy gateway to the single market for them.

    On our own we are just a big island with memories of past glory. We may very well become the Argentina of the 21st Century.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,379

    Nigelb said:

    calum said:
    Refurbs always compromise compartmentation. Fire, like most things in life, takes the path of least resistance. So fire spreads through holes and voids created by retro fitted services.
    All true.

    However, there is a report in the Guardian of a resident who escaped from the 17th floor, with his 68 year old mother:
    “I went back inside the house, looked out the window. I started looking down the window – I had to really pull myself out to look down the window, from the 17th floor, and I see the fire blazing, and coming up really fast, because of the cladding – the cladding was really flammable, and it just caught up like a matchstick.”...

    Another resident confirms that there wasn't a building wide fire alarm system:
    “We saw the fire engines, so we were looking outside at what’s going on. There was no fire alarms anywhere, because we don’t have a kind of integrated fire system – it’s just everyone’s house for itself..."

    Had there been smoke detection on escape routes, and a central fire alarm system, it seems plausible that most people would have got out in time.
    Fires in highrise spread in all sorts of unpredictable ways. It often spreads externally by a blowtorch effect driven by the winds at greater height.
    Like most great tragedies, it'll be a number of things that add up to make things worse.
    I don't disagree.

    My point was rather that a (relatively) cheap improvement to the building's alarm system might have saved scores of lives.
    Providing proper fire separation between floors, for example, is likely a much more expensive and difficult project in old housing stock.
    That's not to say that this should not also have been done in the recent refurbishment - but that the building appears not to have had an adequate alarm system is inexcusable, and completely separate form any 'resources' argument.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,903
    Serious question - What do we spend money on now that wasn't spent on just after the war, as a portion of the overall pie ?
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,298

    I sometimes wonder about all these pbers who get repeatedly asked to complete opinion polls. I was going to say that I'd never been asked, but in truth no pollster would get as far as asking before being brought to an abrupt halt.

    I lived in the UK's most phone polled constituency of 2015.

    It was fun.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793
    edited June 2017

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.

    It's not inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Potentially. But then every terrorist attack is supposed to be a watershed moment as attitudes stiffen to combat radical Islam. Yet nothing happens. It is hard to shock society these days, new events overtake old events and after the minute silence everyone other than those involved in the tragedy move on to something else.

    I have relatives coming over to London from Australia for my wedding in a few weeks. As a Londoner I'm embarrassed of how our City appears to the world, and to an extent the country as a whole. What a mess we find ourselves in.
    And what a change from 2012 when it was the capital of the world.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Scott_P said:

    it is blatantly obvious now that there was never any plan, on any side,as to what to do if Leave won.

    But Gove told us that we have had enough of experts.

    .
    Someone will do well to come up with a crasser partisan point than this today.

    Bremaining Uber Alles.
  • Options

    OK I have a ridiculous theory, after you have read this you will understand why I only got an O Level pass in economics.

    In regard to tax surely the only thing that matters is the tax take, not the tax rate.

    It depends on your ideology. There are people who'd prefer a tax of 95% on millionaires that raised nothing over a tax of 10% that raised something. The latter would be a tax cut for millionaires.

    There are people who'd rather live in a country where everyone had one loaf of bread than in a country where everyone had two loaves apart from one person who has 10.

    It is all about the tax rate. If the take falls you just tax the usual suspects again.
  • Options
    nigel4englandnigel4england Posts: 4,800

    OK I have a ridiculous theory, after you have read this you will understand why I only got an O Level pass in economics.

    In regard to tax surely the only thing that matters is the tax take, not the tax rate.

    I propose to abandon all forms of tax apart from VAT.

    Scrap Income tax, corporation tax, NI contributions both employer and employee, maybe not council tax but it would be on the table. All indirect taxation such as P11d, insurance premium tax etc to go as well

    Increase VAT to 25%, possibly even 30%, for all apart from those on low incomes/unemployed/disability benefits. This would be easy to do with a simple card, if I can pay for something by waving my phone at a PDQ then this would be easy to implement.

    All (well almost all) of that extra money in peoples pockets and on companies bottom line would filter it's way back into the economy, would create more and better paid jobs and allow for better public services. Auto enrolment has ensured companies and employees have to pay into a pension, now they could increase the level of payment so that in years to come the state pension would not be necessary.

    I wonder how much tax could be raised by this, more to the point what would the total tax take be? All those billions currently offshore would come back, no more tax dodging, the economy would be awash with money.

    I suspect (!) there is an obvious flaw in my plan and no doubt you lot will take great delight in pointing it out to me, but I would vote for me!

    Not so much Laffer Curve as Laffer Flatearth!

    VAT is 20% currently. Even assuming no change in buying habits, it woudl need to go up Waaaaaaay more than to 30% to replace ALL TAXES

    It would be cheaper to drive to Calais once a month to do grocery shopping in your world. For anyone north of about...oooh...Leeds
    And of course VAT is not payable on most groceries.
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256

    Scott_P said:

    FF43 said:

    The logic of less Brexit being good is that no Brexit is even better.

    That's the killer line.

    It was always true that no Brexit is better than any Brexit, but the headbangers wanted it anyway.

    Meanwhile, Farage is apparently unhappy about the current state of Brexit.

    Shame.
    Unleash the Farage.
    Cry "Havoc!" and let slip the dog Farage? :D:D
  • Options
    The country is ungovernable, I think.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,267

    Roger said:

    "first brexit sowed division then it made it ungovernable"

    New York Times.

    Roger, it grieves me immensely, but I'm coming round to the idea that Brexit is going to turn into a clusterfuck.
    I still believe it would have been the right thing for us, full EU was never a good fit for us, but due to the sheer incompetence of politicians on all sides, it's just undeliverable. We're governed by aresholes.
    We are going through the event horizon of Brexit at the moment. The worst point, and the time of maximum uncertainty. Hence the feverish lobbying.

    But, I agree the GE result has made things much more complicated.

    It's clear to me what the sensible thing to do is, but it's not clear to me if there are sensible people on both UK and EU sides willing to do it, rather than score points.
  • Options
    MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 44,242
    edited June 2017

    After WW2 UK debt was 250% of GDP. How did Labour reduce it? By SPENDING on homes, NHS, public services

    Austerity doesnt work

    There was an awful lot of austerity after WWII, and rationing of food lasted until the mid-1950s.

    Plus Labour had to cut back on the NHS to fund defence.
    The post war government was ruthless about cutting spending to try and run a surplus to pay down the debt.
    And, it took us almost 60 years to pay it off.
    60 years took us back to the level before WWI in GDP terms. The WWII debt spike was (in GDP terms) dealt with by the mid-50s
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.
    Agree entirely. I'll be one of those voting for him. The establishment needs to be dismantled, greed needs to be punished and society renewed.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226
    edited June 2017

    OK I have a ridiculous theory, after you have read this you will understand why I only got an O Level pass in economics.

    In regard to tax surely the only thing that matters is the tax take, not the tax rate.

    I propose to abandon all forms of tax apart from VAT.

    Scrap Income tax, corporation tax, NI contributions both employer and employee, maybe not council tax but it would be on the table. All indirect taxation such as P11d, insurance premium tax etc to go as well

    Increase VAT to 25%, possibly even 30%, for all apart from those on low incomes/unemployed/disability benefits. This would be easy to do with a simple card, if I can pay for something by waving my phone at a PDQ then this would be easy to implement.

    All (well almost all) of that extra money in peoples pockets and on companies bottom line would filter it's way back into the economy, would create more and better paid jobs and allow for better public services. Auto enrolment has ensured companies and employees have to pay into a pension, now they could increase the level of payment so that in years to come the state pension would not be necessary.

    I wonder how much tax could be raised by this, more to the point what would the total tax take be? All those billions currently offshore would come back, no more tax dodging, the economy would be awash with money.

    I suspect (!) there is an obvious flaw in my plan and no doubt you lot will take great delight in pointing it out to me, but I would vote for me!

    Not so much Laffer Curve as Laffer Flatearth!

    VAT is 20% currently. Even assuming no change in buying habits, it woudl need to go up Waaaaaaay more than to 30% to replace ALL TAXES

    It would be cheaper to drive to Calais once a month to do grocery shopping in your world. For anyone north of about...oooh...Leeds
    ...the devastation of NI business.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 53,924

    Mr. 43, I appreciate that post but still fail to see why/how the EU could force business closures or movement.

    Mr. Bobajob, could you elaborate further please?

    Their currency, their rules.

    As long as we were part of the EU it wasn't a problem for them.
    So can the EU also stop € clearing in say New York?

    Clearing is not what you think it is :smile:

    I'm on my phone, and this is a complex subject, so I will write properly later.
  • Options
    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    calum said:
    Refurbs always compromise compartmentation. Fire, like most things in life, takes the path of least resistance. So fire spreads through holes and voids created by retro fitted services.
    All true.

    However, there is a report in the Guardian of a resident who escaped from the 17th floor, with his 68 year old mother:
    “I went back inside the house, looked out the window. I started looking down the window – I had to really pull myself out to look down the window, from the 17th floor, and I see the fire blazing, and coming up really fast, because of the cladding – the cladding was really flammable, and it just caught up like a matchstick.”...

    Another resident confirms that there wasn't a building wide fire alarm system:
    “We saw the fire engines, so we were looking outside at what’s going on. There was no fire alarms anywhere, because we don’t have a kind of integrated fire system – it’s just everyone’s house for itself..."

    Had there been smoke detection on escape routes, and a central fire alarm system, it seems plausible that most people would have got out in time.
    Fires in highrise spread in all sorts of unpredictable ways. It often spreads externally by a blowtorch effect driven by the winds at greater height.
    Like most great tragedies, it'll be a number of things that add up to make things worse.
    I don't disagree.

    My point was rather that a (relatively) cheap improvement to the building's alarm system might have saved scores of lives.
    Providing proper fire separation between floors, for example, is likely a much more expensive and difficult project in old housing stock.
    That's not to say that this should not also have been done in the recent refurbishment - but that the building appears not to have had an adequate alarm system is inexcusable, and completely separate form any 'resources' argument.
    I agree entirely. Compartmentation is key once a fire starts, but early warning and fire suppression is far more effective. Refurbs in older properties are expensive, and corners get cut and workmen get lazy and complacent.
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    6 fatalities confirmed, number expected to rise.
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256
    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    edited June 2017
    atia2 said:

    We don't have to vote for misery. The war against dignity has been waged by that fucker Dacre aided and abetted by that fucker Duncan Smith. I don't care about "we can't afford it" arguments - we can't afford NOT to treat people with compassion and dignity because very soon it will be us that are old and ill and demented and I don't want to be treated like shit as this generation has been.

    to me its very simple. Too many Conservatives has lost their mind. Utterly disconnected from what this country represents, utterly divorced from understanding of people less fortunate than themselves. Its not the party thats to blame, just the sociopathic wing who preach Christian Values whilst stomping their boot on the throat of the disabled because they're "scroungers".

    You sound deranged.
    I'd say angry but plausible. There is undoubtedly a large helping of anti-empiricist no-government ideology in the Conservative party. Apart from the bad language, where's the derangement?

    You sound complacent.
    The derangement is, for example, in the phrase stomping their boot on the throat of the disabled because they're "scroungers" . This is not only extremely offensive about people who are sincerely trying too do their best for the whole country in difficult circumstances, it's also completely bonkers. It's the kind of thing that the loonier commentatiors in the Guardian to each other say in a kind of echo chamber. I expect Rochdale actually believes that senior Conservative politicians go on about 'scroungers'.
  • Options
    ParistondaParistonda Posts: 1,819

    I sometimes wonder about all these pbers who get repeatedly asked to complete opinion polls. I was going to say that I'd never been asked, but in truth no pollster would get as far as asking before being brought to an abrupt halt.

    It seems risky having so many politically engaged people in your polls, but on the other hand I wonder if PB overall is relatively representative of the country even if we are all anoraks. PB seems to have slight over representation of LDs, and also had an over representation of brexiteers for EUref, but otherwise seems pretty balanced.
  • Options
    FF43FF43 Posts: 15,692

    Roger said:

    "first brexit sowed division then it made it ungovernable"

    New York Times.

    Roger, it grieves me immensely, but I'm coming round to the idea that Brexit is going to turn into a clusterfuck.
    I still believe it would have been the right thing for us, full EU was never a good fit for us, but due to the sheer incompetence of politicians on all sides, it's just undeliverable. We're governed by aresholes.
    I don't want to score points. I am genuinely baffled by how so many intelligent people fail to see obvious clusterfucks coming their way. Brexit is the same as Iraq. It was clear from the off they were both going to be fiascos. No special insight or knowledge required. Simply if people put forward projects on demonstrably false premises, it's not going to turn out well.

  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,379
    These are also perhaps pertinent...

    http://www.kctmo.org.uk/files/board-meetings/164740_board_meeting_-_24_meeting_2016.pdf
    The programme of Fire Risk Assessments and reviews continued and substantial progress has been made with completing the actions and recommendations from the assessments.
    Regular LFB and KCTMO meetings have continued. Standard agenda items include any fires in the stock and any action that can be taken to prevent recurrence, false alarms and LFB attendance at lift shut-ins.

    Grenfell Tower refurbishment – close liaison with LFB and Fire Risk Assessor throughout the duration of the project. At the conclusion of the work some of the operational firefighters from the local Fire Station attended an onsite briefing where the contractor demonstrated the fire safety features of the building.
    There is ongoing work with LFB to ensure remaining high rise blocks are prioritised for familiarisation visits and where possible Home Fire Safety Visits are offered.
    We have provided a range of ongoing publicity to residents, particularly in relation to:
    the “stay put” fire strategy and procedures residents should follow in event of a fire in their flat or elsewhere in their block, and;
    informing leaseholders about the fire safety standards required of their flat entrance doors (existing and any planned replacement)


    http://www.kctmo.org.uk/files/board-meetings/153818_board_pack_-_20_july_2016.pdf
    Grenfell Tower Regeneration
    The regeneration of Grenfell Tower is complete except for the final piece of environmental work around the block. The work has delivered:
    New controllable communal heating to 120 flats (with individual control)
    New double glazed windows
    Thermal overcladding


    The Health & Safety Action Plan will be reviewed and extended to incorporate any new areas where monitoring of compliance with legislation and good practice is required. Specifically –
    Annual H&S report to be produced

    The programme of Fire Risk Assessments & reviews to continue and more work to ensure actions and recommendations from these are consistently completed
    in a timely manner
    Regular LFB liaison meetings. Extend fire safety approach adopted at Grenfell
    Tower to all major works projects - proactive involvement of LFB etc.
    Work with LFB to ensure remaining high rise blocks are prioritised for
    familiarisation visits and where possible Home Fire Safety Visits are offered
    Ongoing publicity etc. to ensure leaseholders continue to ensure any door
    replacement is with compliant door
    Investigate introduction of on-line DSE training & self-assessment…

  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Labour GAIN Chelsea and Fulham.
  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760

    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.
    Agree entirely. I'll be one of those voting for him. The establishment needs to be dismantled, greed needs to be punished and society renewed.
    Sadly if enough people like yourself take the easy solution to dealing with complex problems then nothing will change. We need effective politicians to wake up and implement change not hopeless figures of protest.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    I'm amazed at how quickly some posters can confidently diagnose the underlying causes while this awful fire is still burning.

    To be even more cynical, until things become clearer, I'd stay out of any betting markets involving Boris or Sadiq, the former and current mayors of London. Meanwhile we can only hope for successful rescues.
  • Options
    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.

    It's not inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.
    I think we'll have a Labour government by Christmas. Given that we are nowhere near fixing the harm the last one did, and the next one thinks we need more debt and more taxes, I think that really is then curtains.
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549

    glw said:

    After WW2 UK debt was 250% of GDP. How did Labour reduce it? By SPENDING on homes, NHS, public services

    Austerity doesnt work


    Things were (rightly) very austere in the 1940s under Labour.

    We didn't waste money on things like Starbucks or eating out. Make do and mend era.
    Rationing didn't even end until the 1950s. The idea that the post-war years were anything other than bloody hard is ludicrous.
    The post war Labour government ran surpluses from 1947.
    But that's sort of meaningless when most people alive at the time would have found life very "austere".
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Yeah but predicting 2022 with certainty seems "optimistic"
  • Options

    OK I have a ridiculous theory, after you have read this you will understand why I only got an O Level pass in economics.

    In regard to tax surely the only thing that matters is the tax take, not the tax rate.

    I propose to abandon all forms of tax apart from VAT.

    Scrap Income tax, corporation tax, NI contributions both employer and employee, maybe not council tax but it would be on the table. All indirect taxation such as P11d, insurance premium tax etc to go as well

    Increase VAT to 25%, possibly even 30%, for all apart from those on low incomes/unemployed/disability benefits. This would be easy to do with a simple card, if I can pay for something by waving my phone at a PDQ then this would be easy to implement.

    All (well almost all) of that extra money in peoples pockets and on companies bottom line would filter it's way back into the economy, would create more and better paid jobs and allow for better public services. Auto enrolment has ensured companies and employees have to pay into a pension, now they could increase the level of payment so that in years to come the state pension would not be necessary.

    I wonder how much tax could be raised by this, more to the point what would the total tax take be? All those billions currently offshore would come back, no more tax dodging, the economy would be awash with money.

    I suspect (!) there is an obvious flaw in my plan and no doubt you lot will take great delight in pointing it out to me, but I would vote for me!

    Not so much Laffer Curve as Laffer Flatearth!

    VAT is 20% currently. Even assuming no change in buying habits, it woudl need to go up Waaaaaaay more than to 30% to replace ALL TAXES

    It would be cheaper to drive to Calais once a month to do grocery shopping in your world. For anyone north of about...oooh...Leeds
    And of course VAT is not payable on most groceries.
    There's actually quite a lot of VAT on food. Any preparation is VATable so there is VAT on ready meals.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,901
    edited June 2017
    FF43 said:

    Roger said:

    "first brexit sowed division then it made it ungovernable"

    New York Times.

    Roger, it grieves me immensely, but I'm coming round to the idea that Brexit is going to turn into a clusterfuck.
    I still believe it would have been the right thing for us, full EU was never a good fit for us, but due to the sheer incompetence of politicians on all sides, it's just undeliverable. We're governed by aresholes.
    I don't want to score points. I am genuinely baffled by how so many intelligent people fail to see obvious clusterfucks coming their way. Brexit is the same as Iraq. It was clear from the off they were both going to be fiascos. No special insight or knowledge required. Simply if people put forward projects on demonstrably false premises, it's not going to turn out well.

    For 50 odd years the public have wanted controls on immigration while governments of all stripes have increased it. Then they got a referendum on it

    The fault lies with the politicians who refused to listen. If you keep having to ask someone to stop flicking your ear, eventually you have to hit them
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Mr. Eagles, I can see why the EU would want euro derivatives to be traded in Euroland. I'm still unclear as to any actual authority they have to interfere with British businesses operating in Britain, though.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793

    The country is ungovernable, I think.

    It didn't have to be like this. It's only the stupidity and greed of the political class from Blair on that has brought us to this point.

    If it turns out people have died in a tower block inferno because we can't afford to fit sprinklers yet we can find money for any number of pointless government pet projects the anger is going to be quite something to witness.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    This fire is going to have some long term consequences, it is highlighting the condition and management of social housing and the over riding sense of injustice. It is also provding the racists an opportunity to try and capitalise on the situation. There will be an extensive enquiry which hopefully will identify the causes and if blame is neccesary apportion blame.
    I
  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,298
    rcs1000 said:

    Mr. 43, I appreciate that post but still fail to see why/how the EU could force business closures or movement.

    Mr. Bobajob, could you elaborate further please?

    Their currency, their rules.

    As long as we were part of the EU it wasn't a problem for them.
    So can the EU also stop € clearing in say New York?

    Clearing is not what you think it is :smile:

    I'm on my phone, and this is a complex subject, so I will write properly later.
    Robert, can you reply to my email please and send me your bank details.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    TGOHF said:

    Someone will do well to come up with a crasser partisan point than this today.

    Why thankyou

    The original point was that Leave had no plan.

    Not only did they have no plan, they revelled in it! Plans are for losers...

    Even now, AA Gill remains the most astute commentator on this

    Really, that’s their best offer? That’s the plan? To swagger into Brussels with Union Jack pants on and say: “ ’Ello luv, you’re looking nice today. Would you like some?”

    When the rest of us ask how that’s really going to work, leavers reply, with Terry-Thomas smirks, that “they’re going to still really fancy us, honest, they’re gagging for us. Possibly not Merkel, but the bosses of Mercedes and those French vintners and cheesemakers, they can’t get enough of old John Bull. Of course they’re going to want to go on making the free market with two backs after we’ve got the decree nisi. Makes sense, doesn’t it?”
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,799

    I think several posters here could do with a decent holiday.
  • Options
    TwistedFireStopperTwistedFireStopper Posts: 2,538
    edited June 2017
    FF43 said:

    Roger said:

    "first brexit sowed division then it made it ungovernable"

    New York Times.

    Roger, it grieves me immensely, but I'm coming round to the idea that Brexit is going to turn into a clusterfuck.
    I still believe it would have been the right thing for us, full EU was never a good fit for us, but due to the sheer incompetence of politicians on all sides, it's just undeliverable. We're governed by aresholes.
    I don't want to score points. I am genuinely baffled by how so many intelligent people fail to see obvious clusterfucks coming their way. Brexit is the same as Iraq. It was clear from the off they were both going to be fiascos. No special insight or knowledge required. Simply if people put forward projects on demonstrably false premises, it's not going to turn out well.

    It didn't have to be a clusterfuck. It just needed semi competent politicians on all sides working out what was best. That is clearly naive thinking, I know, but was it really wrong to think that our elected politicians were not this bad?
  • Options
    PAWPAW Posts: 1,074
    I guess that euro clearing needs a high degree of confidence in euro banks?
  • Options
    Beverley_CBeverley_C Posts: 6,256
    TGOHF said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Yeah but predicting 2022 with certainty seems "optimistic"
    Indeed. Predicting what will happen in 6 months looks tricky to me.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226
    FF43 said:

    Roger said:

    "first brexit sowed division then it made it ungovernable"

    New York Times.

    Roger, it grieves me immensely, but I'm coming round to the idea that Brexit is going to turn into a clusterfuck.
    I still believe it would have been the right thing for us, full EU was never a good fit for us, but due to the sheer incompetence of politicians on all sides, it's just undeliverable. We're governed by aresholes.
    I don't want to score points. I am genuinely baffled by how so many intelligent people fail to see obvious clusterfucks coming their way. Brexit is the same as Iraq. It was clear from the off they were both going to be fiascos. No special insight or knowledge required. Simply if people put forward projects on demonstrably false premises, it's not going to turn out well.

    Indeed. And you can bet that if PB'ers are starting to realise, then a lot of ordinary people are as well.

    Brexit is now tied inseparably to the Tory party, such that as the new government's fortunes inevitably decline, so will the popularity of Brexit.

    You can still get 3/1 on a second EU ref with Betfair. There's just a question over its definition of an "in/out referendum", since what I would expect is a bad deal/no deal Brexit as one option and status quo as the other. This is effectively in/out and I would hope Betfair would agree?
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506

    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.
    Agree entirely. I'll be one of those voting for him. The establishment needs to be dismantled, greed needs to be punished and society renewed.

    Various countries have ably demonstrated that communism doesn't work.
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    Brom said:

    Sadly if enough people like yourself take the easy solution to dealing with complex problems then nothing will change.

    Not quite correct. Things can change; there's no complex problem which can't be made worse, and the Labour manifesto is a blueprint for how to go about it.
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,298

    Mr. Eagles, I can see why the EU would want euro derivatives to be traded in Euroland. I'm still unclear as to any actual authority they have to interfere with British businesses operating in Britain, though.

    They want to take back control.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,379
    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Just a tad older than Trump....
  • Options
    JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.

    It's not inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.
    It's nice to see some cool heads giving a rational and measured appraisal of events today.....
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    After WW2 UK debt was 250% of GDP. How did Labour reduce it? By SPENDING on homes, NHS, public services

    Austerity doesnt work

    There was an awful lot of austerity after WWII, and rationing of food lasted until the mid-1950s.

    Plus Labour had to cut back on the NHS to fund defence.
    The post war government was ruthless about cutting spending to try and run a surplus to pay down the debt.
    It also focussed industrial policy very much on exports, to the point of depriving locals. It was balance of payments that was considered the big economic indicator.
  • Options
    nigel4englandnigel4england Posts: 4,800

    OK I have a ridiculous theory, after you have read this you will understand why I only got an O Level pass in economics.

    In regard to tax surely the only thing that matters is the tax take, not the tax rate.

    I propose to abandon all forms of tax apart from VAT.

    Scrap Income tax, corporation tax, NI contributions both employer and employee, maybe not council tax but it would be on the table. All indirect taxation such as P11d, insurance premium tax etc to go as well

    Increase VAT to 25%, possibly even 30%, for all apart from those on low incomes/unemployed/disability benefits. This would be easy to do with a simple card, if I can pay for something by waving my phone at a PDQ then this would be easy to implement.

    All (well almost all) of that extra money in peoples pockets and on companies bottom line would filter it's way back into the economy, would create more and better paid jobs and allow for better public services. Auto enrolment has ensured companies and employees have to pay into a pension, now they could increase the level of payment so that in years to come the state pension would not be necessary.

    I wonder how much tax could be raised by this, more to the point what would the total tax take be? All those billions currently offshore would come back, no more tax dodging, the economy would be awash with money.

    I suspect (!) there is an obvious flaw in my plan and no doubt you lot will take great delight in pointing it out to me, but I would vote for me!

    Not so much Laffer Curve as Laffer Flatearth!

    VAT is 20% currently. Even assuming no change in buying habits, it woudl need to go up Waaaaaaay more than to 30% to replace ALL TAXES

    It would be cheaper to drive to Calais once a month to do grocery shopping in your world. For anyone north of about...oooh...Leeds
    And of course VAT is not payable on most groceries.
    There's actually quite a lot of VAT on food. Any preparation is VATable so there is VAT on ready meals.
    I'm quite prepared to admit that my theory is very similar to the Tory manifesto, in that it has not been fully costed nor thought through properly.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,249

    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    glw said:

    TOPPING said:

    Many political views on the fire on twitter mainly centring around Tory cuts and lax regulations for their (the Tories') landlord friends.

    Cuts is a bit of an odd one seeing as the building has just been refurbished and almost certainly went through some rigorous planning and inspection. Regulations are more plausible, it will be interesting to see if the cladding is a problem and why. One thing that has long concerned me is knock-off parts and material in the supply chains of a lot of industries, it is increasingly difficult to be sure what you are buying is what is claims to be.
    I'
    Because it is true.
    Thanks. Could you explain your previous comment that LFB had plenty of resources? Or do you mean in general resources are stretched nationwide?
    Nationwide, local county fire services are stretched pretty thin. Loughborough, a large market town, large university, fast road network, industrial, and with a large area of surrounding villages now has just one fire engine with 4 crew on it. You're waiting for appliances from other towns or Leicester City. When I worked at Loughborough, there were 2 fire engines with at least nine crew between them. It just isn't enough to do the job safely and to the required operating procedures, so firefighters take risks and cut corners to get the job done. So far we've been lucky, but we won't always be.
    Thanks - tell me also, we hear re. the police (and some MPS senior figures will agree) that efficiency has gone up and that increased numbers don't mean more crime solved, and vice versa, lower numbers don't necessarily mean more crime.

    Is there the same kind of dynamic in the fire service? Or can you simply only respond to half as many incidents as previously when there were two fire engines? And are there often two simultaneous incidents?
    There is no arguing that calls have gone down. Cars are safer, smoke detectors are an amazing invention, building regs(when adhered to!) are more stringent, and fire control call handling cuts the number of times we turn out to false alarms. So we don't turn out as often as we used to, but a house fire is still a house fire, and you still need boots on the ground to do search and rescue, put the fire out and have control of the incident. We don't have the boots on the ground anymore, so a crew of 4 take risks and cut corners on procedures while waiting for the cavalry to turn up. I've been in that situation constantly for the past 5 years.
    Thanks
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.
    Agree entirely. I'll be one of those voting for him. The establishment needs to be dismantled, greed needs to be punished and society renewed.
    Sadly if enough people like yourself take the easy solution to dealing with complex problems then nothing will change. We need effective politicians to wake up and implement change not hopeless figures of protest.
    I disagree. The answer is simple. Take back the wealth stolen from the public. Private greed must ease public debt. Why should we continue to grub around like dogs whilst those at the upper end Swan off on more holidays and take their wealth into offshore havens? Maximum wage, wealth tax, universal income and tax set annually to meet services required. Start living as a society, not as a corporation.
  • Options
    rcs1000 said:

    Mr. 43, I appreciate that post but still fail to see why/how the EU could force business closures or movement.

    Mr. Bobajob, could you elaborate further please?

    Their currency, their rules.

    As long as we were part of the EU it wasn't a problem for them.
    So can the EU also stop € clearing in say New York?

    Clearing is not what you think it is :smile:

    I'm on my phone, and this is a complex subject, so I will write properly later.
    Thank you, I will defer to your far superior knowledge on this.
    I recall reading something a few weeks ago (possible City AM or similar) that said the EU could only really impose this on European banks.

  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226

    After WW2 UK debt was 250% of GDP. How did Labour reduce it? By SPENDING on homes, NHS, public services

    Austerity doesnt work

    There was an awful lot of austerity after WWII, and rationing of food lasted until the mid-1950s.

    Plus Labour had to cut back on the NHS to fund defence.
    The post war government was ruthless about cutting spending to try and run a surplus to pay down the debt.
    It also focussed industrial policy very much on exports, to the point of depriving locals. It was balance of payments that was considered the big economic indicator.
    I did wonder where Ceausescu got the idea from
  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    Nigelb said:

    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Just a tad older than Trump....
    But also with 7 years as leader people have more chance to realise he's not the messiah. Trump took his window of opportunity, Corbyn has possibly narrowly missed his.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Jason said:

    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.

    It's not inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.
    It's nice to see some cool heads giving a rational and measured appraisal of events today.....
    I predict some extreme shrieking and intense butthurt as the realisation slowly dawns on some that Labour lost, Brexit is still happening and that there wont be an election for a fair while..
  • Options
    dyedwooliedyedwoolie Posts: 7,786
    Sean_F said:


    I think several posters here could do with a decent holiday.

    Half as many as could do with a decent government.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:



    We don't have to vote for misery. The war against dignity has been waged by that fucker Dacre aided and abetted by that fucker Duncan Smith. I don't care about "we can't afford it" arguments - we can't afford NOT to treat people with compassion and dignity because very soon it will be us that are old and ill and demented and I don't want to be treated like shit as this generation has been.

    to me its very simple. Too many Conservatives has lost their mind. Utterly disconnected from what this country represents, utterly divorced from understanding of people less fortunate than themselves. Its not the party thats to blame, just the sociopathic wing who preach Christian Values whilst stomping their boot on the throat of the disabled because they're "scroungers".

    So you'd be up for a zero based budgeting approach?

    The fundamental issue is that a wealthy country such as the UK *should* be able to provide a decent support network for those who are less fortunate. This should be entirely possible with the current resources that the government has.

    There is a vast amount of money wasted, too many vested interested and it's only the "easy" stuff that gets cut.
    We need to cut the deficit. To do that we need to expand the economy. To do that we need to invest in the things that will allow it to expand.

    Let me give you a direct example of what I would do. The Tories have slashed Corporation Tax to an absurdly low level but have done nothing to get tax-dodging outfits like Starfucks paying both their taxes and their employees a wage they can afford to live on.

    As a radical alternative, offer Corporation Tax cuts to companies who pay their dues and who pay the living wage to their workers. Because if you want people spending £5 on coffee they need money in their pockets which they won't have if you pay them £7.50 an hour. We need to encourage these businesses to become citizens as well as corporations. As big capitalists of the past have been. Even Henry Ford got that to sell cars people have to be bale to afford them.

    Capitalism was replaced by bankism. We need it back.
    Companies like Starbucks that use legal mechanisms to minimise their tax obligations are taking the p1ss. They have forgotten they have an obligation to stakeholders, not just to shareholders.

    Most companies are not like that, and steps are being taken to tighten up on those that are, but it's a slow and ardous process, not helped by couldtries like Luxembourg and their swiving scheming former prime minister. I forget what he is up to now.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,969
    Mr. Eagles, very droll, but it's not a legal basis for action.
  • Options
    JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    Sean_F said:


    I think several posters here could do with a decent holiday.

    I was thinking that myself. An outbreak of madness has hit this forum today. From a fire to a Corbyn landslide, impeccable logic.
  • Options
    GIN1138 said:

    The country is ungovernable, I think.

    It didn't have to be like this. It's only the stupidity and greed of the political class from Blair on that has brought us to this point.

    If it turns out people have died in a tower block inferno because we can't afford to fit sprinklers yet we can find money for any number of pointless government pet projects the anger is going to be quite something to witness.
    We massively overspend already, everybody feels entitled to more stuff and further feels entitled to have someone else pay for it, and there is no acknowledgement that some things are now simply unaffordable. More and more things will become so.

    We're ungovernable. There's no path back to a government surplus and to a shrinking debt. If you propose any you lose elections. You can only win by promising Peter you'll rob Paul because Paul's filth anyway and he deserves it.
  • Options
    PAWPAW Posts: 1,074
    TheScreamingEagles - they would have control if they took steps to put EU banks on a firm footing?
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,793
    edited June 2017

    Sean_F said:


    I think several posters here could do with a decent holiday.

    Half as many as could do with a decent government.
    LOL! :D
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,249
    Pulpstar said:

    @Topping What lead you to back OM ?

    & Are you up long term on political bets ?
    It wasn't impossible to see Overall Maj, but I'd like to know the reasoning through the fog of war so to speak.

    I shifted onto it on the night personally, this graph gave me food for thought:

    http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/2017-united-kingdom-general-election

    In short I'd like to know if people spotted it through luck or reasoning.

    I made a lot of money on Brexit which was equal parts @Andy_JS and equal parts a hedge against shareprice/currency moves. I made money on Trump because I thought the US was in the mood, and that also informed my Lab OM bet: I thought "here we go again", even though the maths were bonkers for it.
  • Options
    Bobajob_PBBobajob_PB Posts: 928

    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.
    Big Jez is a cyclist, nonsmoker, healthy eater (he's a vegetarian) and doesn't drink much (he's not actually a teetotaller as some sources say but is only a light drinker). As you say, he is in very good shape.
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549

    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.

    Lots of people were certain that the coalition of 2010 would not last.
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,703
    Charles said:

    Charles said:



    We don't have to vote for misery. The war against dignity has been waged by that fucker Dacre aided and abetted by that fucker Duncan Smith. I don't care about "we can't afford it" arguments - we can't afford NOT to treat people with compassion and dignity because very soon it will be us that are old and ill and demented and I don't want to be treated like shit as this generation has been.

    to me its very simple. Too many Conservatives has lost their mind. Utterly disconnected from what this country represents, utterly divorced from understanding of people less fortunate than themselves. Its not the party thats to blame, just the sociopathic wing who preach Christian Values whilst stomping their boot on the throat of the disabled because they're "scroungers".

    So you'd be up for a zero based budgeting approach?

    The fundamental issue is that a wealthy country such as the UK *should* be able to provide a decent support network for those who are less fortunate. This should be entirely possible with the current resources that the government has.

    There is a vast amount of money wasted, too many vested interested and it's only the "easy" stuff that gets cut.
    We need to cut the deficit. To do that we need to expand the economy. To do that we need to invest in the things that will allow it to expand.

    Let me give you a direct example of what I would do. The Tories have slashed Corporation Tax to an absurdly low level but have done nothing to get tax-dodging outfits like Starfucks paying both their taxes and their employees a wage they can afford to live on.

    As a radical alternative, offer Corporation Tax cuts to companies who pay their dues and who pay the living wage to their workers. Because if you want people spending £5 on coffee they need money in their pockets which they won't have if you pay them £7.50 an hour. We need to encourage these businesses to become citizens as well as corporations. As big capitalists of the past have been. Even Henry Ford got that to sell cars people have to be bale to afford them.

    Capitalism was replaced by bankism. We need it back.
    Companies like Starbucks that use legal mechanisms to minimise their tax obligations are taking the p1ss. They have forgotten they have an obligation to stakeholders, not just to shareholders.

    Most companies are not like that, and steps are being taken to tighten up on those that are, but it's a slow and ardous process, not helped by couldtries like Luxembourg and their swiving scheming former prime minister. I forget what he is up to now.
    AFAIK Costa (Whitbread) pay their taxes, use them instead of Starbucks.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226
    The Tories are lucky that this year's local elections are out of the way already.
  • Options

    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.
    I'm with you on that. May ain't gonna last a full term, and when the Tories slot her and we get an "unelected" PM, there'll be an unstoppable wave of public outcry to have a GE. Then it's a massive payrise for me. Jeremy loves the FBU.
  • Options
    Bobajob_PBBobajob_PB Posts: 928
    glw said:

    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.

    Lots of people were certain that the coalition of 2010 would not last.
    That was a very different setup, for reasons you really ought to grasp!
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 38,921
    TOPPING said:

    TOPPING said:

    Perhaps now they will finally stop building these death traps

    Those "events" coming thick and fast!

    I grew up in a tower block (in Denmark), lived there for about 15 years. Never experienced better maintenance and always felt safe. Clearly more people are exposed to risk than in a single family house, so high standards are needed, but there's nothing wrong with the idea per se.
    Hong Kong manages.
    Ahem. The Garley Building.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1996_Garley_Building_fire
    (the number of high-rise buildings in HK) x (the incidence of such incidents) = trivial
    There is also the fact that, having suffered such a tragic event, HK tightened up their regulations and procedures.

    Incidentally, from what I've been told Mainland China has not.
  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760

    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.
    If he does fight an election he'll face someone other than Mrs May. If he can't come close to beating her then he best hope he's facing a complete dud in better circumstances.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,226
    edited June 2017

    glw said:

    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.

    Lots of people were certain that the coalition of 2010 would not last.
    That was a very different setup, for reasons you really ought to grasp!
    The LibDems proved far more resolute than the Tories, which was the opposite of what was expected.

    The key question is whether the Tory party will hold together as the pressure grows on what will inevitably be an unpopular government from Day One. I wouldn't put any money on it lasting anywhere near its full term.

    I still think May will resign after the QS, or after parliament breaks up for the summer. She is behaving either like someone in idiotic denial, or someone who wants to pass the job of changing the approach to Brexit onto the next guy.
  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760

    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.
    I'm with you on that. May ain't gonna last a full term, and when the Tories slot her and we get an "unelected" PM, there'll be an unstoppable wave of public outcry to have a GE. Then it's a massive payrise for me. Jeremy loves the FBU.

    More money for everyone!!! What could go wrong.
  • Options
    Bobajob_PBBobajob_PB Posts: 928
    TGOHF said:

    Jason said:

    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.

    It's not inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.
    It's nice to see some cool heads giving a rational and measured appraisal of events today.....
    I predict some extreme shrieking and intense butthurt as the realisation slowly dawns on some that Labour lost, Brexit is still happening and that there wont be an election for a fair while..
    Given the woeful verification rate of your predictions these past few weeks, why should anyone give this latest forecast any credence?
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,249

    TOPPING said:

    atia2 said:

    TOPPING said:

    atia2 said:



    Concerning, and not surprising.

    First world country?

    We can't afford the Fire Brigade. Or Police. Or Hospitals. Or Armed Forces. Or Human Dignity. We have to live within our means. With the emphasis on mean.

    We choose it @RochdalePioneers. Sorry but we do.
    This is trivially true. You can close down every policy argument by noting that we chose the current policies. It's not particularly illuminating.
    How else would you describe our political system? We vote for the one we want. Is it a dreadful way to do things? Yep. Is it the least bad of the alternatives? Yep.
    We don't have to vote for misery. The war against dignity has been waged by that fucker Dacre aided and abetted by that fucker Duncan Smith. I don't care about "we can't afford it" arguments - we can't afford NOT to treat people with compassion and dignity because very soon it will be us that are old and ill and demented and I don't want to be treated like shit as this generation has been.

    to me its very simple. Too many Conservatives has lost their mind. Utterly disconnected from what this country represents, utterly divorced from understanding of people less fortunate than themselves. Its not the party thats to blame, just the sociopathic wing who preach Christian Values whilst stomping their boot on the throat of the disabled because they're "scroungers".
    Hmm - you are usually super-insightful about most everything pragmatic politics-wise and here you are blaming other forces (the MSM, the "sociopathic forces of the Conservative") for the way people vote. Not very @RochdalePioneers. Dacre? Give me a break - so you can discern and see through the complete bolleaux that he spouts, and yet your fellow man cannot?

    Hmmm.
  • Options
    glwglw Posts: 9,549

    glw said:

    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.

    Lots of people were certain that the coalition of 2010 would not last.
    That was a very different setup, for reasons you really ought to grasp!
    It's different, but people were just as certain it would not last.
  • Options
    JasonJason Posts: 1,614

    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.
    This government will survive, because it has one driving purpose behind it - stopping the possibility of Corbyn becoming PM. Don't underestimate how powerful that is.
  • Options
    nunuonenunuone Posts: 1,138

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Labour GAIN Chelsea and Fulham.
    Majority 8,000. Would require 10% swing. So possible if the citizens of nowhere are angry enough.
  • Options
    logical_songlogical_song Posts: 9,703
    glw said:

    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.

    Lots of people were certain that the coalition of 2010 would not last.
    The coalition had around 76 seat majority much bigger than Tories/DUP, also it was a proper coalition not C&S.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,379

    I'm amazed at how quickly some posters can confidently diagnose the underlying causes while this awful fire is still burning.

    To be even more cynical, until things become clearer, I'd stay out of any betting markets involving Boris or Sadiq, the former and current mayors of London. Meanwhile we can only hope for successful rescues.
    Pepys in March 1663:
    “..my Lord Mayor I find to be a talking, bragging Bufflehead…”

    Has much changed in the intervening centuries ?
  • Options
    David_EvershedDavid_Evershed Posts: 6,506

    Charles said:

    Charles said:



    .

    So you'd be up for a zero based budgeting approach?

    The fundamental issue is that a wealthy country such as the UK *should* be able to provide a decent support network for those who are less fortunate. This should be entirely possible with the current resources that the government has.

    There is a vast amount of money wasted, too many vested interested and it's only the "easy" stuff that gets cut.
    We need to cut the deficit. To do that we need to expand the economy. To do that we need to invest in the things that will allow it to expand.

    Let me give you a direct example of what I would do. The Tories have slashed Corporation Tax to an absurdly low level but have done nothing to get tax-dodging outfits like Starfucks paying both their taxes and their employees a wage they can afford to live on.

    As a radical alternative, offer Corporation Tax cuts to companies who pay their dues and who pay the living wage to their workers. Because if you want people spending £5 on coffee they need money in their pockets which they won't have if you pay them £7.50 an hour. We need to encourage these businesses to become citizens as well as corporations. As big capitalists of the past have been. Even Henry Ford got that to sell cars people have to be bale to afford them.

    Capitalism was replaced by bankism. We need it back.
    Companies like Starbucks that use legal mechanisms to minimise their tax obligations are taking the p1ss. They have forgotten they have an obligation to stakeholders, not just to shareholders.

    Most companies are not like that, and steps are being taken to tighten up on those that are, but it's a slow and ardous process, not helped by couldtries like Luxembourg and their swiving scheming former prime minister. I forget what he is up to now.
    AFAIK Costa (Whitbread) pay their taxes, use them instead of Starbucks.
    Starbucks and Costa products are a discretionary purchase.

    Use disctretion and save money if you can't afford their products.

    Let them drink water.
  • Options
    BromBrom Posts: 3,760
    Jason said:

    Brom said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Laughable. Won't he be around 72 in 2022? People predicting next month have no idea let alone landslides potentially years down the line.
    Jezza is in rude health, and no way will this government survive 5 years.
    This government will survive, because it has one driving purpose behind it - stopping the possibility of Corbyn becoming PM. Don't underestimate how powerful that is.
    The Tories only want to rule. They will deal and compromise to stay in power. They have the seats, Labour need an unprecedented amount of by-elections or defections. If Corbyn has a poll lead then there will be no pressure on them to call an election until the 5 years is up. Of course there will be bumps in the road but those Scottish seats gave the Tories enough insurance to feel they can ride out the 5 years, though probably not under Mrs May's leadership.
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,249
    FF43 said:

    Roger said:

    "first brexit sowed division then it made it ungovernable"

    New York Times.

    Roger, it grieves me immensely, but I'm coming round to the idea that Brexit is going to turn into a clusterfuck.
    I still believe it would have been the right thing for us, full EU was never a good fit for us, but due to the sheer incompetence of politicians on all sides, it's just undeliverable. We're governed by aresholes.
    I don't want to score points. I am genuinely baffled by how so many intelligent people fail to see obvious clusterfucks coming their way. Brexit is the same as Iraq. It was clear from the off they were both going to be fiascos. No special insight or knowledge required. Simply if people put forward projects on demonstrably false premises, it's not going to turn out well.

    Yeah, but it felt goooooooooood.

    Just think - no more droite de suite.
  • Options
    JonCisBackJonCisBack Posts: 911

    OK I have a ridiculous theory, after you have read this you will understand why I only got an O Level pass in economics.

    In regard to tax surely the only thing that matters is the tax take, not the tax rate.

    I propose to abandon all forms of tax apart from VAT.

    Scrap Income tax, corporation tax, NI contributions both employer and employee, maybe not council tax but it would be on the table. All indirect taxation such as P11d, insurance premium tax etc to go as well

    Increase VAT to 25%, possibly even 30%, for all apart from those on low incomes/unemployed/disability benefits. This would be easy to do with a simple card, if I can pay for something by waving my phone at a PDQ then this would be easy to implement.

    All (well almost all) of that extra money in peoples pockets and on companies bottom line would filter it's way back into the economy, would create more and better paid jobs and allow for better public services. Auto enrolment has ensured companies and employees have to pay into a pension, now they could increase the level of payment so that in years to come the state pension would not be necessary.

    I wonder how much tax could be raised by this, more to the point what would the total tax take be? All those billions currently offshore would come back, no more tax dodging, the economy would be awash with money.

    I suspect (!) there is an obvious flaw in my plan and no doubt you lot will take great delight in pointing it out to me, but I would vote for me!

    Not so much Laffer Curve as Laffer Flatearth!

    VAT is 20% currently. Even assuming no change in buying habits, it woudl need to go up Waaaaaaay more than to 30% to replace ALL TAXES

    It would be cheaper to drive to Calais once a month to do grocery shopping in your world. For anyone north of about...oooh...Leeds
    That could be overcome by something akin to a duty free allowance.

    Why would you assume no change in buying habits, people would have vast amounts more to spend and would gleefully do so.

    Many thanks for the reply though, I am open to a few tweaks before I put it to the country.
    Well I didn't think about it for more than a few seconds and I am far form an expert!

    I mean you're not...serious? right?

    I suspect cash deals might skyrocket, black market may have an incentive to flourish etc
    One source of taxation is quite risky and volatile as well surely?
  • Options
    Bobajob_PBBobajob_PB Posts: 928
    nunuone said:

    GIN1138 said:

    ... It's [not] inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.

    It is becoming inconceivable Corbyn could not win a landslide at the next election.
    Labour GAIN Chelsea and Fulham.
    Majority 8,000. Would require 10% swing. So possible if the citizens of nowhere are angry enough.
    Yes, keep using that term "citizens of nowhere", please. See how far it gets you.
  • Options
    JasonJason Posts: 1,614

    TGOHF said:

    Jason said:

    GIN1138 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    This tower block fire is going to be very bad for the Conservative government...

    Tragically it may well be the defining moment that the establishments mistreatment of the people is writ large. Everything that is wrong with the UK in one awful conflagration.
    Civil unrest a real possibility if criminal negligence by those who should protect us is shown.
    Very very dangerous times.
    Yep I can see riots by the mistreated populace and riots by people having their Brexit vote's stolen from them.

    A period of civil unrest does seem very likely.

    And then, when people have got their anger our of their system, they will all go out and vote Jezza into Downing St. at the next available opportunity just to punish the establishment on last time.

    It's not inconceivable Corbyn could win a landslide at the next election, IMO.
    It's nice to see some cool heads giving a rational and measured appraisal of events today.....
    I predict some extreme shrieking and intense butthurt as the realisation slowly dawns on some that Labour lost, Brexit is still happening and that there wont be an election for a fair while..
    Given the woeful verification rate of your predictions these past few weeks, why should anyone give this latest forecast any credence?
    And what searing predicitons have you offered that have all come true, bobajob?
This discussion has been closed.