Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Every day that the GE2017 campaign is suspended is a win for t

SystemSystem Posts: 12,261
edited May 2017 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Every day that the GE2017 campaign is suspended is a win for the terrorists

One of the main functions of an election campaign is to ensure that those who seek to govern us are subject to proper scrutiny something that is much easier to avoid in non-election periods.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited May 2017
    first! but about to suffer the curse of deletion...
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,682
    edited May 2017
    I agree and UKIP to be fair to them are launching their manifesto and restarting their campaign tomorrow. Labour are recommencing their local campaigns on Thursday and their national campaign on Friday, May is flying to the G7 at the end of the week so while the Tory local campaign may resume on Friday for practical purposes the Tory national campaign won't start until the beginning of next week
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,712
    hmmm

    this is a victory for May and Corbyn

    Corbyn wants to stay low because he's associated with terror

    May wants to bury her manifesto screw ups

    suits the big two
  • NemtynakhtNemtynakht Posts: 2,329
    It's a nonsense and Labour should be making an issue of it.
  • ChelyabinskChelyabinsk Posts: 505
    edited May 2017

    From Inspector Gadget:

    Except that a terrorist attack is not what the Police Federation were talking about.

    Police will be forced to adopt a “paramilitary” style of enforcement if the government inflicts big budget cuts on them, the head of the police officers’ organisation has warned.

    Steve White, chair of the Police Federation, said his 123,000 members, from police constables to inspectors, fear a move towards a more violent style of policing as they try to keep law and order with even fewer officers than now.

    White told the Guardian that more cuts would be devastating: “You get a style of policing where the first options are teargas, rubber bullets and water cannon, which are the last options in the UK.”

    White said cuts would see the bedrock principle of British law enforcement, policing by consent, ripped apart.

  • blueblueblueblue Posts: 875
    The EU Referendum campaign was suspended for three full days without the rush for resumption that we are now seeing. The threat level has now been at critical for fewer than 24 hours (it lasted for 3 and 4 days respectively on the last two occasions it was used).

    The election isn't going anywhere, the debates and interviews are still on, there are still two full weeks to go from tomorrow. Democracy can handle a few days' disruption.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Evening all. - UKIP has confirmed it will launch its manifesto on Thursday, with leader Paul Nuttall saying the democratic process must continue.

    Has any other party announced when they'll resume full campaigning yet?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,682
    edited May 2017
    So effectively the campaign does restart tomorrow, with a resumption of national campaigning on Friday
  • ab195ab195 Posts: 477
    edited May 2017
    It's bollocks (no criticism of you - it's not obvious from the top level numbers). That speech was a good one and she frequently challenged them well on stuff like Stop and Search and institutional racism. Crime continued to fall and mostly what happened is that administrative police roles were cut. Since 2015 the budget has been relatively protected, and CT functions have never been cut. On the contrary they are much improved.

    The great unspoken truth is that we have too many police forces, and those cuts made a number of them merge in all but name: a good thing. (Note - I'm not proposing a one size fits all approach like in Scotland, just that the likes of Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire should have one police force).

    Those cuts are not relevant to what we are seeing, which is the military back-filling static guarding posts to free up armed police for dynamic roles. Armed police numbers have not fallen.
  • Old_HandOld_Hand Posts: 49
    I have just learned that local campaigning is resuming at 12 noon tomorrow and that a minute's silence is first being observed at 11-00am. National campaigning resumes on Friday.
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Old_Hand said:

    I have just learned that local campaigning is resuming at 12 noon tomorrow and that a minute's silence is first being observed at 11-00am. National campaigning resumes on Friday.

    I heard that von the radio some time ago...
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142
    HYUFD said:
    I just hope it isn't during the minutes silence. Or perhaps that is the only time anyone will hear them?

    Agree with the thread. Campaigning should resume. The minute silence is a neat point at which to resume campaigning (afterwards, of course).
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,682
    Interestingly when May attends the G7 on Friday and Saturday in Italy, 4/7 leaders will be attending their first summit, May, Trump, Macron and Gentiloni. Trudeau, Abe and Merkel the only leaders to have been in place more than a year
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,726
    FPT Jeremy the peacemaker is crap. Seamus Mallon has pointed out that Corbyn never bothered to meet the SDLP, and was exclusively supportive of Sinn Fein.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142

    twitter.com/LawDavF/status/867450155619975168
    twitter.com/shashj/status/867452787101237248

    HMG need to up their criticism/condemnation of these leaks. Hopefully May will be giving Trump an earful.
  • Ishmael_ZIshmael_Z Posts: 8,981
    Campaigning expands (or contracts) to fill the time available, and my subjective view is this campaign was far too long in the first place. If you look at 2005 (exactly a month from dissolution to GE), losing a week to grieving would have made things a bit tight; if we lose a whole week now the campaign will be as long as 2005.

    People and politicians need time to consider the implications of a terrible event like Monday's: it takes at least several days to decide how you react to it. Looking at some of the nastiness and silliness (not here!) of the last couple of days I think it's important that those campaigning have the opportunity to formulate their responses, so that they don't come out on camera with thoughtless and bloody stupid statements of a kind which generate huge quantities of more or less simulated outrage. That isn't good for democracy.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,682
    RobD said:

    HYUFD said:
    I just hope it isn't during the minutes silence. Or perhaps that is the only time anyone will hear them?

    Agree with the thread. Campaigning should resume. The minute silence is a neat point at which to resume campaigning (afterwards, of course).
    Indeed with the full national campaign restarting tomorrow as Laura Kuenssberg has confirmed
    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/867402258090266626
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    RobD said:

    twitter.com/LawDavF/status/867450155619975168
    twitter.com/shashj/status/867452787101237248

    HMG need to up their criticism/condemnation of these leaks. Hopefully May will be giving Trump an earful.
    The level of detail in the leaks is quite astonishing:

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/24/world/europe/manchester-arena-bomb-materials-photos.html?_r=0
  • marke09marke09 Posts: 926
    Wonder if Andrew Neil gives us one of his masterclass intros tomorrow as he did the day after Westminster attacks
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142

    RobD said:

    twitter.com/LawDavF/status/867450155619975168
    twitter.com/shashj/status/867452787101237248

    HMG need to up their criticism/condemnation of these leaks. Hopefully May will be giving Trump an earful.
    The level of detail in the leaks is quite astonishing:

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/24/world/europe/manchester-arena-bomb-materials-photos.html?_r=0
    Pretty irresponsible of the NY Times, to be honest. What exactly do the public gain from knowing this, apart from macabre titillation?
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,726
    ab195 said:

    It's bollocks (no criticism of you - it's not obvious from the top level numbers). That speech was a good one and she frequently challenged them well on stuff like Stop and Search and institutional racism. Crime continued to fall and mostly what happened is that administrative police roles were cut. Since 2015 the budget has been relatively protected, and CT functions have never been cut. On the contrary they are much improved.

    The great unspoken truth is that we have too many police forces, and those cuts made a number of them merge in all but name: a good thing. (Note - I'm not proposing a one size fits all approach like in Scotland, just that the likes of Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire should have one police force).

    Those cuts are not relevant to what we are seeing, which is the military back-filling static guarding posts to free up armed police for dynamic roles. Armed police numbers have not fallen.
    IMHO May's stance on stop and search was wrong. Even some Labour politicians, like Joan Ryan, are calling for stop and search to be stepped up, in response to a wave of knife crime.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Given all major parties had announced their plans to resume campaigning by the day after tomorrow before this thread was published, this thread seems a tad redundant and petty no offence - unless it was penned and scheduled prior to the announcements to resume on Friday that came before this was published.

    They've already announced a full resumption by Friday. While I'd have preferred Thursday, is that really worth quibbling over by this point?
  • Y0kelY0kel Posts: 2,307
    Honest to good f**k, those looking for any party political partisan angle on Manchester, wise up. Political facts in a situation are not the same as seeing everything through your party colours.

    Police resources: In NI, where active human and technical watch activity was less than 150 targets at most, there were around 8,500 regular police officers and about 4500-5000 reservists many of whom were full time. You 10's of thousands of UK military at peak, you had 6000 UDR. You had MI5 and to a smaller extent had MI6.

    You had a quite widespread informant network that took about 10 years to build and grew into a monster.

    Even with extensive resources and sources like that, far in excess of anything the UK government has to hand in proportion today, they had to rely heavily on informants as well as routine policing activities because they just didn't have enough to keep watch on all critical people in the way some people think you can.

    You can't, get over it.

    There are several hundred Abedis alone, travellers who raise suspicion. are seen in the wrong places, but don't have any firm action behind them on domestic soil. On top you have former fighters, proper grenade throwing, trigger pulling types, you have logistics support, facilitators, encouragers many of which might just decide to go to Allah even after you weed out those who won't do the pointy stick bit yet still may be of high interest. Several thousand then. Chances are they are picking sub-two hundred to sit on at any one time.

    As for Libya, anyone who can remember the apparently off topic rantings of this madman back in 2016 in particular will see a few posts on Islamic extremists working out of Libya, training and inserting people into Europe and reports on Western military interest.

    Anyone who thinks Islamic extremists just popped up after Gaddafi went forget it, again talking through their party political hole, get an education. They have been churning out high grade extremists for decades.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,726
    Y0kel said:

    Honest to good f**k, those looking for any party political partisan angle on Manchester, wise up. Political facts in a situation are not the same as seeing everything through your party colours.

    Police resources: In NI, where active human and technical watch activity was less than 150 targets at most, there were around 8,500 regular police officers and about 4500-5000 reservists many of whom were full time. You 10's of thousands of UK military at peak, you had 6000 UDR. You had MI5 and to a smaller extent had MI6.

    You had a quite widespread informant network that took about 10 years to build and grew into a monster.

    Even with extensive resources and sources like that, far in excess of anything the UK government has to hand in proportion today, they had to rely heavily on informants as well as routine policing activities because they just didn't have enough to keep watch on all critical people in the way some people think you can.

    You can't, get over it.

    There are several hundred Abedis alone, travellers who raise suspicion. are seen in the wrong places, but don't have any firm action behind them on domestic soil. On top you have former fighters, proper grenade throwing, trigger pulling types, you have logistics support, facilitators, encouragers many of which might just decide to go to Allah even after you weed out those who won't do the pointy stick bit yet still may be of high interest. Several thousand then. Chances are they are picking sub-two hundred to sit on at any one time.

    As for Libya, anyone who can remember the apparently off topic rantings of this madman back in 2016 in particular will see a few posts on Islamic extremists working out of Libya, training and inserting people into Europe and reports on Western military interest.

    Anyone who thinks Islamic extremists just popped up after Gaddafi went forget it, again talking through their party political hole, get an education. They have been churning out high grade extremists for decades.

    Hindsight is always a wonderful judge. No doubt the security services thought there were more dangerous shitbags than Abedi. By and large, they've done a good job.
  • ab195ab195 Posts: 477
    Sean_F said:

    ab195 said:

    It's bollocks (no criticism of you - it's not obvious from the top level numbers). That speech was a good one and she frequently challenged them well on stuff like Stop and Search and institutional racism. Crime continued to fall and mostly what happened is that administrative police roles were cut. Since 2015 the budget has been relatively protected, and CT functions have never been cut. On the contrary they are much improved.

    The great unspoken truth is that we have too many police forces, and those cuts made a number of them merge in all but name: a good thing. (Note - I'm not proposing a one size fits all approach like in Scotland, just that the likes of Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire should have one police force).

    Those cuts are not relevant to what we are seeing, which is the military back-filling static guarding posts to free up armed police for dynamic roles. Armed police numbers have not fallen.
    IMHO May's stance on stop and search was wrong. Even some Labour politicians, like Joan Ryan, are calling for stop and search to be stepped up, in response to a wave of knife crime.
    It's a fine judgement call. Community cohesion and consent for policing vs. speedy action. I am prepared to accept I might be wrong and debate the approach, but my judgement is that the former is more valuable in the long term. We really do have policing by consent here, and that's what keeps some of the rioting you see in the US at bay.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,231
    Y0kel said:

    Honest to good f**k, those looking for any party political partisan angle on Manchester, wise up.

    Overall the security services seem to be doing a pretty good job - but as the IRA observed, they 'have to be lucky always'.

    Any thoughts on the stream of leaks coming from the US on Manchester?
  • sladeslade Posts: 2,092
    Another conspiracy theory - the secret state allowed May to have her interview with Andrew Neil and then allowed the bombing to go ahead so that all opposition leaders were effectively silenced. Ain't life wonderful.
  • HaroldOHaroldO Posts: 1,185

    Y0kel said:

    Honest to good f**k, those looking for any party political partisan angle on Manchester, wise up.

    Overall the security services seem to be doing a pretty good job - but as the IRA observed, they 'have to be lucky always'.

    Any thoughts on the stream of leaks coming from the US on Manchester?
    Someone in US intel is getting some attention from a reporter or two, but will soon be getting a knock at the door.
  • HaroldOHaroldO Posts: 1,185
    slade said:

    Another conspiracy theory - the secret state allowed May to have her interview with Andrew Neil and then allowed the bombing to go ahead so that all opposition leaders were effectively silenced. Ain't life wonderful.

    I've seen one or two conspiracies already, bearing in mind this plan would have to been enacted by a governing party that cannot even launch a manifesto properly.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    ab195 said:

    It's bollocks (no criticism of you - it's not obvious from the top level numbers). That speech was a good one and she frequently challenged them well on stuff like Stop and Search and institutional racism. Crime continued to fall and mostly what happened is that administrative police roles were cut. Since 2015 the budget has been relatively protected, and CT functions have never been cut. On the contrary they are much improved.

    The great unspoken truth is that we have too many police forces, and those cuts made a number of them merge in all but name: a good thing. (Note - I'm not proposing a one size fits all approach like in Scotland, just that the likes of Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire should have one police force).

    Those cuts are not relevant to what we are seeing, which is the military back-filling static guarding posts to free up armed police for dynamic roles. Armed police numbers have not fallen.
    Well quite. Beds, Herts and Cambs already pool resources in a whole range of areas, from police dogs to counter-terrorism. Herts and Cambs didn't come out of their most recent inspections at all badly, but Bedfordshire is an atypically small force and rather struggles. My knowledge of policing is very limited, but I would imagine that being both diminutive and having Luton on their patch isn't helpful to them.

    A combination of the three counties would not be vastly different in terms either of population or geographic extent to the area which has been patrolled by the Thames Valley Police for the last 50 years; however, I can't recall having seen any talk of a merger on the local news for some years, since proposals for a tie up between Herts & Beds were shelved.
  • marke09marke09 Posts: 926
    To those who say its a result of police cuts etc how many police did we have when 7/7 happened?
  • Y0kelY0kel Posts: 2,307
    edited May 2017

    Y0kel said:

    Honest to good f**k, those looking for any party political partisan angle on Manchester, wise up.

    Overall the security services seem to be doing a pretty good job - but as the IRA observed, they 'have to be lucky always'.

    Any thoughts on the stream of leaks coming from the US on Manchester?
    The Americans tend to share. Its how they work.

    There are only two likely agencies which would have the data sharing that is coming out, the FBI and CIA so its coming from them or political elements privy to it as well but it looks direct from agency. The NSA is less likely.

    Why?

    Someone (likely more than a single source) just likes sharing
    There is a point specific to this case or general handling (it wouldn't be a first time that agencies have sent info to the public domain because they think it needs to be there)
    Something else, to which political motivation is a possibility

    Being honest, other than naming Abedi early, and lets bear in mind they tend to do that in the US, nothing coming out is going to change actions this side of the water.

  • The_TaxmanThe_Taxman Posts: 2,979
    slade said:

    Another conspiracy theory - the secret state allowed May to have her interview with Andrew Neil and then allowed the bombing to go ahead so that all opposition leaders were effectively silenced. Ain't life wonderful.

    I should have thought an interview with Neil is as welcome as suffering piles. Is it better or worse for the other parties that they will have their interviews closer to the 8th June? I suspect most people actually welcome the cessation in political discourse given the backdrop....
  • MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792
    Well said OGH. It's a tragedy that the public is forced to choose between these dwarves.
  • marke09marke09 Posts: 926
    edited May 2017

    slade said:

    Another conspiracy theory - the secret state allowed May to have her interview with Andrew Neil and then allowed the bombing to go ahead so that all opposition leaders were effectively silenced. Ain't life wonderful.

    I should have thought an interview with Neil is as welcome as suffering piles. Is it better or worse for the other parties that they will have their interviews closer to the 8th June? I suspect most people actually welcome the cessation in political discourse given the backdrop....
    Tomorrows ITV interview with Theresa May has been postponed but Corbyn due on Friday with Andrew Neil
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,726
    marke09 said:

    To those who say its a result of police cuts etc how many police did we have when 7/7 happened?

    About the same as now.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,854
    The worst kept secret in politics is out - Ted Malloch was never in the running to become ambassador to the EU.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-clarifies-that-self-declared-eu-envoy-candidate-isnt-up-for-post-1495649596
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,383
    marke09 said:

    slade said:

    Another conspiracy theory - the secret state allowed May to have her interview with Andrew Neil and then allowed the bombing to go ahead so that all opposition leaders were effectively silenced. Ain't life wonderful.

    I should have thought an interview with Neil is as welcome as suffering piles. Is it better or worse for the other parties that they will have their interviews closer to the 8th June? I suspect most people actually welcome the cessation in political discourse given the backdrop....
    Tomorrows ITV interview with Theresa May has been postponed but Corbyn due on Friday with Andrew Neil
    Good re Corbyn interview. I hope the rest of the Neil interviews can be arranged for next week.
  • ThomasNasheThomasNashe Posts: 5,331
    Yes, agree 100%. We should be back under way by now, and it's disgraceful that we're not.
  • ab195ab195 Posts: 477

    ab195 said:

    It's bollocks (no criticism of you - it's not obvious from the top level numbers). That speech was a good one and she frequently challenged them well on stuff like Stop and Search and institutional racism. Crime continued to fall and mostly what happened is that administrative police roles were cut. Since 2015 the budget has been relatively protected, and CT functions have never been cut. On the contrary they are much improved.

    The great unspoken truth is that we have too many police forces, and those cuts made a number of them merge in all but name: a good thing. (Note - I'm not proposing a one size fits all approach like in Scotland, just that the likes of Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire should have one police force).

    Those cuts are not relevant to what we are seeing, which is the military back-filling static guarding posts to free up armed police for dynamic roles. Armed police numbers have not fallen.
    Well quite. Beds, Herts and Cambs already pool resources in a whole range of areas, from police dogs to counter-terrorism. Herts and Cambs didn't come out of their most recent inspections at all badly, but Bedfordshire is an atypically small force and rather struggles. My knowledge of policing is very limited, but I would imagine that being both diminutive and having Luton on their patch isn't helpful to them.

    A combination of the three counties would not be vastly different in terms either of population or geographic extent to the area which has been patrolled by the Thames Valley Police for the last 50 years; however, I can't recall having seen any talk of a merger on the local news for some years, since proposals for a tie up between Herts & Beds were shelved.
    Yes things like procurement have been pooled, and we've just about ended the spectacle of more than 30 "fleets" of a single helicopter, all with different maintenance contracts. But more could be done. If we're to have more police (and I'm not against that) then it does make sense to rationalise first before growth.

    There are a great may reasons to criticise the PM, including over some security matters, but seeing folk crawl all over each other looking for a smoking gun to pin Manchester on her is not right.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142

    marke09 said:

    slade said:

    Another conspiracy theory - the secret state allowed May to have her interview with Andrew Neil and then allowed the bombing to go ahead so that all opposition leaders were effectively silenced. Ain't life wonderful.

    I should have thought an interview with Neil is as welcome as suffering piles. Is it better or worse for the other parties that they will have their interviews closer to the 8th June? I suspect most people actually welcome the cessation in political discourse given the backdrop....
    Tomorrows ITV interview with Theresa May has been postponed but Corbyn due on Friday with Andrew Neil
    Good re Corbyn interview. I hope the rest of the Neil interviews can be arranged for next week.
    Extended break for the One Show presenters.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 12,043
    RobD thanks for the reply on the previous thread - appreciated.

    I'm wondering why it (2nd pref to fptp) is in the manifesto. It raises issues on voting systems which will be debated again and which for the time being were completely dead and for types of elections where it is pretty impossible to put up an argument for fptp.

    Just asking for trouble where none was present.
  • Black_RookBlack_Rook Posts: 8,905
    Sean_F said:

    ab195 said:

    It's bollocks (no criticism of you - it's not obvious from the top level numbers). That speech was a good one and she frequently challenged them well on stuff like Stop and Search and institutional racism. Crime continued to fall and mostly what happened is that administrative police roles were cut. Since 2015 the budget has been relatively protected, and CT functions have never been cut. On the contrary they are much improved.

    The great unspoken truth is that we have too many police forces, and those cuts made a number of them merge in all but name: a good thing. (Note - I'm not proposing a one size fits all approach like in Scotland, just that the likes of Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire should have one police force).

    Those cuts are not relevant to what we are seeing, which is the military back-filling static guarding posts to free up armed police for dynamic roles. Armed police numbers have not fallen.
    IMHO May's stance on stop and search was wrong. Even some Labour politicians, like Joan Ryan, are calling for stop and search to be stepped up, in response to a wave of knife crime.
    Unfortunately, both the police and Government are in a no-win situation with stop and search. You don't do it and they're accused of going soft on the carrying of concealed weapons. They do it and they're accused of racial profiling, and minority interest groups kick up a stink and put people off co-operating with them. Always the same issue: a lot of screaming about racism and stigmatising the young, the only solution to which is to implement quotas and waste an enormous, indeed impractical quantity of resources searching little old white ladies for blades. And Labour politicians, including those to whom you refer, would probably be at the vanguard of any protests. Police brutality, same-old-racist-Tories, yada yada.

    At least if you don't have those politicians and community leaders running around like headless chickens and effectively encouraging people to withhold co-operation, then you do have the chance to use an intelligence-based approach instead.
  • KentRisingKentRising Posts: 2,917
    edited May 2017
    HYUFD said:
    UKIP are in line with the public mood on this, I reckon. Time to press on.

    Wonder if UKIP's move forced the Tories' and Labour's hand a little. As it is, UKIP will have uncontentested coverage in the election part of the news tomorrow.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142
    kjh said:

    RobD thanks for the reply on the previous thread - appreciated.

    I'm wondering why it (2nd pref to fptp) is in the manifesto. It raises issues on voting systems which will be debated again and which for the time being were completely dead and for types of elections where it is pretty impossible to put up an argument for fptp.

    Just asking for trouble where none was present.

    Yes, I was quite surprised it was included. Perhaps the view is that all elections should be conducted using the same voting system?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,526
    Well said Mike. We've had two days off, let's have a minute's silence tomorrow morning then continue where we left off. Possibly in slightly more reserved tones.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,288

    HYUFD said:
    UKIP are in line with the public mood on this, I reckon. Time to press on.
    Agree.

    Most people who grew (or lost) a beard would fix themselves a new Twitter picture.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    kjh said:

    RobD thanks for the reply on the previous thread - appreciated.

    I'm wondering why it (2nd pref to fptp) is in the manifesto. It raises issues on voting systems which will be debated again and which for the time being were completely dead and for types of elections where it is pretty impossible to put up an argument for fptp.

    Just asking for trouble where none was present.

    Actually it could put to bed arguments about voting systems.

    Every time people cast a vote with a different system it changes the conversation to voting systems, why don't we change Westminster etc - by putting forward a single uniform system (FPTP) across all English elections it has a one off discussion but then ends the trial of different systems across England. FPTP becomes entrenched as our voting system.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,761
    marke09 said:

    To those who say its a result of police cuts etc how many police did we have when 7/7 happened?

    page 3

    file:///C:/Users/john/Downloads/SN00634.pdf
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,381
    Opinion polls... must... have... opinion polls...
  • marke09marke09 Posts: 926
    Dont see what SKY or BBC will have to report on after tomorrow anyway
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    marke09 said:

    To those who say its a result of police cuts etc how many police did we have when 7/7 happened?

    page 3

    file:///C:/Users/john/Downloads/SN00634.pdf
    LOL that link won't work for anyone except maybe a hacker on your PC :D
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,635

    marke09 said:

    To those who say its a result of police cuts etc how many police did we have when 7/7 happened?

    page 3

    file:///C:/Users/john/Downloads/SN00634.pdf
    We'll need yr IP address tho.
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614
    HaroldO said:

    slade said:

    Another conspiracy theory - the secret state allowed May to have her interview with Andrew Neil and then allowed the bombing to go ahead so that all opposition leaders were effectively silenced. Ain't life wonderful.

    I've seen one or two conspiracies already, bearing in mind this plan would have to been enacted by a governing party that cannot even launch a manifesto properly.
    Yeah, it's like George W Bush concocting 9/11. Thousands still believe that is the case.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,408

    HYUFD said:
    UKIP are in line with the public mood on this, I reckon. Time to press on.

    Wonder if UKIP's move forced the Tories' and Labour's hand a little. As it is, UKIP will have uncontentested coverage in the election part of the news tomorrow.
    Strongly suspect that no one cares whether the campaign starts on Thursday or Friday and that an extra day for UKIP will be worth less than 100 votes across the nation.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142

    Opinion polls... must... have... opinion polls...

    *twitch*
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    RobD said:

    Opinion polls... must... have... opinion polls...

    *twitch*
    Guessing the opinion pollsters won't even be conducting their research while this suspension is happening, and publication normally happens a day or two later, so can we expect any polls before Saturday evening?
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 42,359

    The worst kept secret in politics is out - Ted Malloch was never in the running to become ambassador to the EU.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-clarifies-that-self-declared-eu-envoy-candidate-isnt-up-for-post-1495649596

    It was cruel (but entertaining) that no one felt the need to let Ted know.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142

    RobD said:

    Opinion polls... must... have... opinion polls...

    *twitch*
    Guessing the opinion pollsters won't even be conducting their research while this suspension is happening, and publication normally happens a day or two later, so can we expect any polls before Saturday evening?
    Yeah, but we may have some old polls from before the attack, however worthwhile they are.
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614

    HYUFD said:
    UKIP are in line with the public mood on this, I reckon. Time to press on.

    Wonder if UKIP's move forced the Tories' and Labour's hand a little. As it is, UKIP will have uncontentested coverage in the election part of the news tomorrow.
    Which is exactly why they are doing it, and no, I don't blame them at all. Indeed, Labour hope UKIP get as much favourable publicity as possible, for obvious reasons.

    Anyone been watching the match? Fucking turgid crap from Mourinho. At least Gurning Flopp plays attacking football.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,761
    oh bugger
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,257
    All the Tories need to do to restart campaigning is to have a poster with pictures of May and Corbyn and a caption "Which one makes you most secure?"

    Followed up with some choice quotes from McDonnell and Abbot.

    Then sit back for a fortnight.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142

    oh bugger

    What's happened?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142

    All the Tories need to do to restart campaigning is to have a poster with pictures of May and Corbyn and a caption "Which one makes you most secure?"

    Followed up with some choice quotes from McDonnell and Abbot.

    Then sit back for a fortnight.

    Or just dig out the quote of Abbott wanting to disband the security services.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,761
    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,761
    RobD said:

    oh bugger

    What's happened?
    My link
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,635

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
  • JasonJason Posts: 1,614

    All the Tories need to do to restart campaigning is to have a poster with pictures of May and Corbyn and a caption "Which one makes you most secure?"

    Followed up with some choice quotes from McDonnell and Abbot.

    Then sit back for a fortnight.

    I'm not sure the Tories will go for that now, but they don't really need to. The Sun and the Mail will do it for them.

    I reckon by the end of the campaign, every single person eligible to vote will know, in detail, everything Corbyn, Abbott & McDonnell ever said and did.

    And their judgement will be severe.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,541


    I'm not sure the Tories will go for that now, but they don't really need to. The Sun and the Mail will do it for them.

    I reckon by the end of the campaign, every single person eligible to vote will know, in detail, everything Corbyn, Abbott & McDonnell ever said and did.

    And their judgement will be severe.
    Jason said:

    All the Tories need to do to restart campaigning is to have a poster with pictures of May and Corbyn and a caption "Which one makes you most secure?"

    Followed up with some choice quotes from McDonnell and Abbot.

    Then sit back for a fortnight.

    I'm not sure the Tories will go for that now, but they don't really need to. The Sun and the Mail will do it for them.

    I reckon by the end of the campaign, every single person eligible to vote will know, in detail, everything Corbyn, Abbott & McDonnell ever said and did.

    And their judgement will be severe.
    The Sun and the Mail doing it for them is the story of British political discourse.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,761
    Pulpstar said:

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
    AB 45 NO
  • kjhkjh Posts: 12,043
    RobD said:

    kjh said:

    RobD thanks for the reply on the previous thread - appreciated.

    I'm wondering why it (2nd pref to fptp) is in the manifesto. It raises issues on voting systems which will be debated again and which for the time being were completely dead and for types of elections where it is pretty impossible to put up an argument for fptp.

    Just asking for trouble where none was present.

    Yes, I was quite surprised it was included. Perhaps the view is that all elections should be conducted using the same voting system?
    Reply to Philip as well who made the same point as Rob:

    But it won't will it. We will still have STV and Constituencies with top ups (although neither in England). Guess we have got rid of lists by default.

    I have to say (personal view point) that the experiment with these systems seemed designed to fail by bringing in the worst possible types. 2nd preference seemed to be have a go at PR and then change your mind after the first round and resort to fptp, which to me seems odd and lists are just awful for so many reasons.
  • WhisperingOracleWhisperingOracle Posts: 9,541
    strange double quote there - but the Tories' vastly influential mouthpiece is the point.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    I suspect there will be some polling activity on Thur and Fri before people go off for their bank holiday break/halfterm and then the results will appear on Saturday night in the normal manner.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,526
    Jason said:

    All the Tories need to do to restart campaigning is to have a poster with pictures of May and Corbyn and a caption "Which one makes you most secure?"

    Followed up with some choice quotes from McDonnell and Abbot.

    Then sit back for a fortnight.

    I'm not sure the Tories will go for that now, but they don't really need to. The Sun and the Mail will do it for them.

    I reckon by the end of the campaign, every single person eligible to vote will know, in detail, everything Corbyn, Abbott & McDonnell ever said and did.

    And their judgement will be severe.
    Sadly, Brexit and social care are no longer the topics of debate for this election, it's all going to be about security from now on.

    As you say, the Tories will go back to being Strong&Stable, and will let the Mail and Sun give both barrels to Labour for a fortnight.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,761
    Yes AB gone

    Eng surely have this in bag
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,635
    Ave_it said:

    I suspect there will be some polling activity on Thur and Fri before people go off for their bank holiday break/halfterm and then the results will appear on Saturday night in the normal manner.

    Lab Gain South Holland
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    Pulpstar said:

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
    Ask and thou shalt receive
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,383

    Pulpstar said:

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
    AB 45 NO
    Is it Burnham's birthday?
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,526
    edited May 2017

    Pulpstar said:

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
    AB 45 NO
    SA ahead on runs but behind on wickets, fascinating last hour coming. 115 required from 72 balls.

    Edit: GOT HIM!!!!!! 225/7, out of batsmen this looks over for the visitors.
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034

    Pulpstar said:

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
    AB 45 NO
    Andy Burnham celebrating his 45th birthday in New Orleans?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,854
    I'm surprised no-one has mentioned that May is likely to get a G7 summit bounce going into next week.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,355
    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    twitter.com/LawDavF/status/867450155619975168
    twitter.com/shashj/status/867452787101237248

    HMG need to up their criticism/condemnation of these leaks. Hopefully May will be giving Trump an earful.
    The level of detail in the leaks is quite astonishing:

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/24/world/europe/manchester-arena-bomb-materials-photos.html?_r=0
    Pretty irresponsible of the NY Times, to be honest. What exactly do the public gain from knowing this, apart from macabre titillation?
    They're Americans. They believe freedom of speech means exactly that. An interesting article IMO.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,526
    edited May 2017
    And another! 230/8, all over now. Great start to the summer :)
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,142

    I'm surprised no-one has mentioned that May is likely to get a G7 summit bounce going into next week.

    She is?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 72,158
    edited May 2017
    Sandpit said:

    Pulpstar said:

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
    AB 45 NO
    SA ahead on runs but behind on wickets, fascinating last hour coming. 115 required from 72 balls.

    Edit: GOT HIM!!!!!! 225/7, out of batsmen this looks over for the visitors.
    Their number nine is truly pathetic, he averages barely over 120 with the bat.

    Why is BJO supporting the Proteas?

    Edit - Ok, make that a smidgeon over 64.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 12,043
    kjh said:

    RobD said:

    kjh said:

    RobD thanks for the reply on the previous thread - appreciated.

    I'm wondering why it (2nd pref to fptp) is in the manifesto. It raises issues on voting systems which will be debated again and which for the time being were completely dead and for types of elections where it is pretty impossible to put up an argument for fptp.

    Just asking for trouble where none was present.

    Yes, I was quite surprised it was included. Perhaps the view is that all elections should be conducted using the same voting system?
    Reply to Philip as well who made the same point as Rob:

    But it won't will it. We will still have STV and Constituencies with top ups (although neither in England). Guess we have got rid of lists by default.

    I have to say (personal view point) that the experiment with these systems seemed designed to fail by bringing in the worst possible types. 2nd preference seemed to be have a go at PR and then change your mind after the first round and resort to fptp, which to me seems odd and lists are just awful for so many reasons.
    Correcting myself - still have top ups for London assembly election or is that proposed to be changed as well?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,383

    I'm surprised no-one has mentioned that May is likely to get a G7 summit bounce going into next week.

    Won't all eyes be on Macron?
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    10 an over with just 2 wickets in hand ...

    Surely England can't blow this? ;)
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,761
    MTimT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
    AB 45 NO
    Andy Burnham celebrating his 45th birthday in New Orleans?
    ABICIMOM

    ABDV not so much
  • freetochoosefreetochoose Posts: 1,107
    Completely agree with the thread header, I said yesterday morning I wanted to see what May and Corbyn are like in a crisis. As it stands I'm very disappointed with both.
  • MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034

    MTimT said:

    Pulpstar said:

    looks like a good day out for TSE

    Surely just need AB

    Andy Burnham :) ?
    AB 45 NO
    Andy Burnham celebrating his 45th birthday in New Orleans?
    ABICIMOM

    ABDV not so much
    The sad thing is I understood that! Too much PB
This discussion has been closed.