politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » NEW PB/Polling Matters podcast: Discussing today’s GfK / Business Insider survey results
On this week’s PB/Polling Matters podcast Keiran is joined by Adam Bienkov and Adam Payne from Business Insider UK to discuss today’s GfK/Business Insider poll results.
Given Corbyn's ratings are starting from such a poor place, imagine how bad they will be in five years once those still believing the dream have woken up.
We just don't know. Everyone is talking about the Labour share in the polls being overestimated - what if the polls are actually UNDER ESTIMATING the Labour share by applying an out-dated methodology? I think we truly don't know...
Not that I am optimsitic - my betting position is based on L 160, T 400+.
From recent research by Populus:
1. The current support base for both Tories and Labour is comprised primarily (about 75%) of their 2015 voters. In the Tories' case their VI has shot up so much that this represents the large bulk of their support under Cameron; in Labour's case they've suffered significant attrition. 2. Tory support is skewed particularly towards pensioners, a large cohort who vote religiously. Labour support is skewed particularly towards 18-24 year olds, a small cohort at least half of whom would rather go down the pub or stay in bed. 3. Of the roughly 1 in 4 supporters of each party who did not vote for them in 2015, most of the additional Tory voters are Ukip defectors, who have a proven track record of voting. Most of the additional Labour voters are people who voted neither in the previous election nor in the EU referendum, and who therefore have a proven track record of not voting.
In addition:
4. ICM, who continue to report Labour consistently at under 30%, have effectively accused other companies of not weighting turnout properly. There is also good reason to suppose that at least some of the pollsters are also incorrectly weighting by 2015 turnout, and are under-counting the Lib Dems and over-counting Labour in their final figures. 5. We ought also to remember that there is a fairly consistent trend in the polls, as seen for example in 2015, of the companies under-reporting the Conservatives and over-reporting Labour - a stubborn problem that they seem to have trouble solving.
In short, Labour is bleeding its previous supporters and reliant on the young and previous non-voters - the most unreliable sections of the electorate - to plug the gaps. The Tories are holding on to their existing support and have very strong backing both from previous Ukip voters, and from the elderly - the section of the electorate most likely to vote. Whilst one cannot be 100% certain that the polls are skewed against rather than in favour of Labour, I'd say that another polling fail, with Labour falling short of expectations, is a possibility we should consider very seriously.
One of the Adam's says Blair is skilled (true) but says his pro-Remain message is effective, but can he get a hearing? Which means it hasn't been effective, as it hasn't been heard. What they mean is they think it is a good message, not that it is effective.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
'No LD surge'! That's putting it mildly! People just keep expecting them to outperform pools, it isn't happening, it won;t happen now. If they go backwards they are dead. If they stay still it's a longtime in wilderness. They need some forward momentum, however slight.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
She is a PMILF strategic genius - slaughtering UKIP from the right, and mopping up Labour (and the LDs for that matter) from the left.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
This was an interesting piece on Mrs May's politics, and what to expect:
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
Yes, very distressing times for a small state Conservative. We've finally been able to dump the EU and it's protectionism and over regulation only for it to be replaced by Westminster.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
'No LD surge'! That's putting it mildly! People just keep expecting them to outperform pools, it isn't happening, it won;t happen now. If they go backwards they are dead. If they stay still it's a longtime in wilderness. They need some forward momentum, however slight.
Even if they were to recover some from here they are starting from a lower base than 4 weeks ago. The LDs have always had a good postal operatiin so they need to recover very quickly or they will be out of the game in the constituecies they are targeting.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
She is a PMILF strategic genius - slaughtering UKIP from the right, and mopping up Labour (and the LDs for that matter) from the left.
I think you are giving her a lot of credit because everyone else is committing suicide around about her. She is simply last one standing.
Depends which elements of the Free market she is "attacking" / dealing with.
The Conservatives have for too long been the Party of BIG business-if May is tackling market abuse and dominance by the big companies with a corresponding boost for small companies then i would be very pleased to see that.
But i suspect i will be underwhelmed by what is actually on offer.
May is playing the One Nation Conservative card but only to a point. The calculation is fairly easy to work out, the Conservative base isn't going anywhere because the alternative is so poor so its land and expand on new territory.
Bear in mind that UKIP base is not exactly economically to the right, nor is the shaky Labour voters who can't abide Corbyn but might just sit at home rather than shift. If May coaxes them out here, its big win territory.
Depends which elements of the Free market she is "attacking" / dealing with.
The Conservatives have for too long been the Party of BIG business-if May is tackling market abuse and dominance by the big companies with a corresponding boost for small companies then i would be very pleased to see that.
But i suspect i will be underwhelmed by what is actually on offer.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
She's the Ted Heath de nos jours.
She thinks there is a bureaucratic solution to every social problem.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
She's the Ted Heath de nos jours.
Pity Carswell left the Kippers. A genuinely free marketeer UKIP could have survived as opposition on May's right flank. Too late now.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
@SamCoatesTimes: Plus new deficit rules, scrapping universal free school lunches and getting rid of tax lock in tonight's Times twitter.com/timespictures/…
Depends which elements of the Free market she is "attacking" / dealing with.
The Conservatives have for too long been the Party of BIG business-if May is tackling market abuse and dominance by the big companies with a corresponding boost for small companies then i would be very pleased to see that.
But i suspect i will be underwhelmed by what is actually on offer.
Energy cap. It's awful policy.
Agreed-it does nothing to break up an obvious Oligopoly Does next to nothing to encourage innovation and nothing to encourage new entrants.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
Sounds like it will be interesting - still plenty of 'cut this, cut that' so a much harsher sounding manifesto, but the Labour one was too far in the opposite direction. LD one read as fairly realistic.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
This was an interesting piece on Mrs May's politics, and what to expect:
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
FPT, my favourite Trump story of the day... http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-trip-idUSKCN18D0C7 National Security Council officials have strategically included Trump's name in "as many paragraphs as we can because he keeps reading if he's mentioned," according to one source, who relayed conversations he had with NSC officials....
LD manifesto out, and the papers still lead on Tory promises from a manifesto not out yet (is it?)
Lib-Dems want to stop Brexit... What else is there to say about their manifesto?
They can't stop it even if they wanted, so it's worth looking if any other ideas are decent, even if it is to see if the others pinch their ideas at some point.
I won't burden this thread by reposing my summaries of each section of the manifesto from the last thread.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
Yes i suspect you are probably correct.
But May didn't write this on her own-Timothy was no doubt heavily involved and that is not a good thing- but others must have done as well.
I actually agree with the idea that that the wealthier middle classes need to pay more for their care-BUT will they get value for money or is it (more likely) just a way of subsidising others??
LD manifesto out, and the papers still lead on Tory promises from a manifesto not out yet (is it?)
Lib-Dems want to stop Brexit... What else is there to say about their manifesto?
They can't stop it even if they wanted, so it's worth looking if any other ideas are decent, even if it is to see if the others pinch their ideas at some point.
I won't burden this thread by reposing my summaries of each section of the manifesto from the last thread.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
The interesting speculation is who will lead the first attempted defenestration, and on what issue.
LD manifesto out, and the papers still lead on Tory promises from a manifesto not out yet (is it?)
Lib-Dems want to stop Brexit... What else is there to say about their manifesto?
They can't stop it even if they wanted, so it's worth looking if any other ideas are decent, even if it is to see if the others pinch their ideas at some point.
I won't burden this thread by reposing my summaries of each section of the manifesto from the last thread.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
And an impending landslide majority...
Yep. So what? That has been certain since Corbyn and his army of deluded clowns took over her only viable opposition.
Yep, was rooting for Wednesday. Bad luck fella. Huddersfield cheated earlier in the season by playing a weakened team against Brum that probably sent Blackburn down, or could have relegated Forest. Not good to see them progress.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
The interesting speculation is who will lead the first attempted defenestration, and on what issue.
She won't be defenestered whilst she's riding high in the polls, and sorting Brexit.
But, the Party will want her gone very soon after GE2022 if this is her philosophical approach.
In policy terms May is less Thatcher more Le Pen. To be clear, I don't mean that in a "she's a fascist" hyperbolic way. But look at the direction she is moving in, tough language on immigration while simultaneously moving leftwards on economic policy. If you strip out all the FN baggage and history and look purely at their manifesto, it was not a million miles from May, but obviously more extreme in both directions.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
The interesting speculation is who will lead the first attempted defenestration, and on what issue.
She won't be defenestered whilst she's riding high in the polls, and sorting Brexit.
But, the Party will want her gone very soon after GE2022 if this is her philosophical approach.
I thought you were over the moon about getting your party back from the Cameron/Osborne mafia?
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
She is a PMILF strategic genius - slaughtering UKIP from the right, and mopping up Labour (and the LDs for that matter) from the left.
I think you are giving her a lot of credit because everyone else is committing suicide around about her. She is simply last one standing.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
The interesting speculation is who will lead the first attempted defenestration, and on what issue.
She won't be defenestered whilst she's riding high in the polls, and sorting Brexit.
But, the Party will want her gone very soon after GE2022 if this is her philosophical approach.
Nah, leadership challenge from Priti in the autumn!
Anyway, let's perhaps wait for the detail before getting too excited.
On one thing I agree: the tide of public opinion on immigration must be turned and, even if that involves tough measures now to bring the numbers down, it will be better for a healthier public dialogue on how to manage and control it in the medium-long term.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
The interesting speculation is who will lead the first attempted defenestration, and on what issue.
She won't be defenestered whilst she's riding high in the polls, and sorting Brexit.
But, the Party will want her gone very soon after GE2022 if this is her philosophical approach.
Had a chat last night with someone who was utterly convinced she will quit well before that. Reckons she'll serve three years, tops, then resign.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
The interesting speculation is who will lead the first attempted defenestration, and on what issue.
She won't be defenestered whilst she's riding high in the polls, and sorting Brexit.
But, the Party will want her gone very soon after GE2022 if this is her philosophical approach.
Had a chat last night with someone who was utterly convinced she will quit well before that. Reckons she'll serve three years, tops, then resign.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
The interesting speculation is who will lead the first attempted defenestration, and on what issue.
She won't be defenestered whilst she's riding high in the polls, and sorting Brexit.
But, the Party will want her gone very soon after GE2022 if this is her philosophical approach.
Had a chat last night with someone who was utterly convinced she will quit well before that. Reckons she'll serve three years, tops, then resign.
May is a (nanny) Statist Tory. She genuinely believes that the State is likely to be a part of the solution rather than a part of the problem. It's Tory Jim, but not as we know it.
The state is part of the solution because the only way you will break up the dominant market players is through Govt action.
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
There is a role for the State in setting the rules and the dimensions of the playing field. But she wants to go a lot further than that. I think she is suspicious of freedom and cautious about innovation. Things can always be worse.
May is a dullard, pure and simple. She wants a Britain cloyed by mediocrity, piousness and conformity. She is a curtain-twitching meddler with no time for creativity, metropolitan attitudes or unorthodox lives.
The interesting speculation is who will lead the first attempted defenestration, and on what issue.
She won't be defenestered whilst she's riding high in the polls, and sorting Brexit.
But, the Party will want her gone very soon after GE2022 if this is her philosophical approach.
Had a chat last night with someone who was utterly convinced she will quit well before that. Reckons she'll serve three years, tops, then resign.
Stop the presses!
If you want a crazy unsubstantiated rumour, try this:
Comments
https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/864946261962756100
1. The current support base for both Tories and Labour is comprised primarily (about 75%) of their 2015 voters. In the Tories' case their VI has shot up so much that this represents the large bulk of their support under Cameron; in Labour's case they've suffered significant attrition.
2. Tory support is skewed particularly towards pensioners, a large cohort who vote religiously. Labour support is skewed particularly towards 18-24 year olds, a small cohort at least half of whom would rather go down the pub or stay in bed.
3. Of the roughly 1 in 4 supporters of each party who did not vote for them in 2015, most of the additional Tory voters are Ukip defectors, who have a proven track record of voting. Most of the additional Labour voters are people who voted neither in the previous election nor in the EU referendum, and who therefore have a proven track record of not voting.
In addition:
4. ICM, who continue to report Labour consistently at under 30%, have effectively accused other companies of not weighting turnout properly. There is also good reason to suppose that at least some of the pollsters are also incorrectly weighting by 2015 turnout, and are under-counting the Lib Dems and over-counting Labour in their final figures.
5. We ought also to remember that there is a fairly consistent trend in the polls, as seen for example in 2015, of the companies under-reporting the Conservatives and over-reporting Labour - a stubborn problem that they seem to have trouble solving.
In short, Labour is bleeding its previous supporters and reliant on the young and previous non-voters - the most unreliable sections of the electorate - to plug the gaps. The Tories are holding on to their existing support and have very strong backing both from previous Ukip voters, and from the elderly - the section of the electorate most likely to vote. Whilst one cannot be 100% certain that the polls are skewed against rather than in favour of Labour, I'd say that another polling fail, with Labour falling short of expectations, is a possibility we should consider very seriously.
The big unknown is which game Theresa May is playing.
I suspect we won't be getting any public polls from them.
People might read too much into them.
Have Populus gone the way of Angus-Reid?
I believe they do the fieldwork for Crosby-Textor, who are the private pollsters for the Tories.
Again people might read too much into their polls.
PMILFstrategic genius - slaughtering UKIP from the right, and mopping up Labour (and the LDs for that matter) from the left.The election research I referenced down-thread was an analysis of the Lord Ashcroft data:
http://elections.newstatesman.com/the-650/profile-of-a-landslide-where-the-tories-are-gaining-and-labour-losing/
https://twitter.com/foxinsoxuk/status/864718635708944384
Imagine a country led by the Daily Mail, and you are not too far from the depressing truth.
Bad sleeps makes you look 'significantly' more ugly
Dark-circled "panda" eyes and puffy lids can even put others off socialising with you, they say.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-39933232
Can only assume that May won't let this drop in order to keep the Ukip defectors on board.
The Conservatives have for too long been the Party of BIG business-if May is tackling market abuse and dominance by the big companies with a corresponding boost for small companies then i would be very pleased to see that.
But i suspect i will be underwhelmed by what is actually on offer.
Bear in mind that UKIP base is not exactly economically to the right, nor is the shaky Labour voters who can't abide Corbyn but might just sit at home rather than shift. If May coaxes them out here, its big win territory.
What's wrong with panda gay sex?
FBI now leaking that there was unusual interference with the investigation into Trump campaign ties to Russian state and criminal entities.
Dog whistle politics is back!
A true market economy needs the state to deal with market abuse-Tories should be actively seeking the state to deal with these abuses.
SME's are the drivers of innovation job creation and growth-not big business.
Tories = One Nation Heath?
Tories = Blue Labour?
ALL ground is being covered! What a brilliant strategy lol!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-north-east-orkney-shetland-39940006
Does next to nothing to encourage innovation
and nothing to encourage new entrants.
As i said-i expect to be underwhelmed.
https://twitter.com/vote_leave/status/733018241484922880
But, I shall wait and see.
And what will come after.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-trip-idUSKCN18D0C7
National Security Council officials have strategically included Trump's name in "as many paragraphs as we can because he keeps reading if he's mentioned," according to one source, who relayed conversations he had with NSC officials....
I won't burden this thread by reposing my summaries of each section of the manifesto from the last thread.
I don't remember that.
But May didn't write this on her own-Timothy was no doubt heavily involved and that is not a good thing- but others must have done as well.
I actually agree with the idea that that the wealthier middle classes need to pay more for their care-BUT will they get value for money or is it (more likely) just a way of subsidising others??
Post-war consensus politics of the 50s/early 60s around a mixed economy, one nation and state intervention.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-war_consensus
Um, thanks everyone
Yep, was rooting for Wednesday. Bad luck fella. Huddersfield cheated earlier in the season by playing a weakened team against Brum that probably sent Blackburn down, or could have relegated Forest. Not good to see them progress.
But, the Party will want her gone very soon after GE2022 if this is her philosophical approach.
On one thing I agree: the tide of public opinion on immigration must be turned and, even if that involves tough measures now to bring the numbers down, it will be better for a healthier public dialogue on how to manage and control it in the medium-long term.
People must feel they can pull the levers.
Well worth catching.
I know, just making chitchat.
https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2017/05/may-intends-appoint-liam-fox-chancellor/