Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Huge CON gains, LAB collapse UKIP wipe out – the story of the

1235»

Comments

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,994
    edited May 2017
    You'd think with Tories hoovering up the ukip vote and accused of doing so with ukip policies, that Con would lose a bit more from the wetter among their ranks, but doesn't seem like all that many are jumping ship. Another terrible omen for LDs of ukippy Tories aren't losing the liberal Tory vote.

    But time for counting. Au revoir
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,168

    If you want to get rid of it, simply replace it with another.

    "I'm a Barbie girl in a Barbie world" usually does the trick.
    I like that one. Brings back happy memories.
  • kjohnwkjohnw Posts: 1,456
    edited May 2017
    can anyone help i'm trying to remember who was the guy who was always on General Election night on TV with pop out eyes and gap in his front teeth it's reallly bugging me
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,000
    edited May 2017

    Who has 8/1?
    Bet365

    What a heathen you are :p
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,168
    Yes, hurrah for RobD.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited May 2017

    I'd say it's more that UKIP have taken over the Tory leadership
    Good morning all.

    I've seen this line being pushed a lot on my Twitter timeline. It's counterproductive. The electorate, for whatever reason, has stopped listening to Labour. That's the kindest interpretation. That they might be listening and being repelled would be worse.

    However, this idea that May has now become 'Farage with breasts' butters no parsnips and will win no elections. Labour need to stop blaming the electorate while characterizing them as racists and/or sheeple.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,000
    edited May 2017
    Hallam is poor value at Tories 9-1 by the way.

    Just back sub 10 seats. If Hallam is gone, Lib Dems are not going to hit 10 seats.
    Hallam can be held and still sub 10, Southport, Norfolk North, Carshalton all more vulnerable.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 44,854
    AndyJS said:

    BBC: turnout up 5% compared to 2013.

    Interesting. Weren't most people predicting a lower turnout?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,994

    Clegg to lose???
    Real possibility. And he's still the best performer the LDs have, with 5-10 seats and potentially no major talent, ugh, looks tough.
  • ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133

    I like that one. Brings back happy memories.
    My first year at university.

    It took about three weeks of badgering him to get the SU Friday night DJ to play it...
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,282
    kle4 said:

    You'd think with Tories hoovering up the ukip vote and accused of doing so with ukip policies, that Con would lose a bit more from the wetter among their ranks, but doesn't seem like all that many are jumping ship. Another terrible omen for LDs of ukippy Tories aren't losing the liberal Tory vote.

    But time for counting. Au revoir

    Have fun!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,994
    Locals not the same as ge, LDs need that message, but odd they need to argue they'll do better in ge
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,168

    Isn't there a large student vote in Hallam? Are the students still likely to be there or will University have finished for the summer?

    No. They took out the studenty bits before 2010.

    Most of the senior academic staff of the two universities live in Sheffield Hallam though.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    kjohnw said:

    can anyone help i trying to remember who was the guy who was always on General Election night on TV with pop out eyes and gap in his front teeth it's reallly bugging me

    Anthony Howard?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,282

    Yes, hurrah for RobD.

    How would you feel if I deleted the stuff on the sheet and replaced it with "AV SUX" in huge letters?

    *innocent face*
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 44,854
    Just watching Prof. Curtice on the BBC. Can he not afford a haircut? ;)
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Pulpstar said:

    Bet365

    What a heathen you are :p
    9/1 at present. Topped up!
  • JonWCJonWC Posts: 289
    I think the LDs will be more stunned by their shocker in Somerset than the WoE mayoralty. They weren't expecting that at all. Chickens coming home to roost...
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    Pulpstar said:

    Hallam is poor value at Tories 9-1 by the way.

    Just back sub 10 seats. If Hallam is gone, Lib Dems are not going to hit 10 seats.
    Hallam can be held and still sub 10, Southport, Norfolk North, Carshalton all more vulnerable.

    Labrokes are 16-1 though
  • kjohnwkjohnw Posts: 1,456

    Anthony Howard?
    yes that's the one thank you
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,168
    Pulpstar said:

    Bet365

    What a heathen you are :p
    I've always said the guy that sets the political odds at Bet365 hasn't got a clue about politics.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,803
    UKIP missed a Hartlepool council by election win by just 23 votes. Their nearest result of the night so far?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,000

    9/1 at present. Topped up!
    Wonder when their chief trader will get into work. Leaving it open overnight... brave :o
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,143
    edited May 2017
    Overall so far looks like a good night for the Tories, poor for Labour, mixed for LDs and terrible for UKIP
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,168
    RobD said:

    How would you feel if I deleted the stuff on the sheet and replaced it with "AV SUX" in huge letters?

    *innocent face*
    Shame on you.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 64,641
    JonWC said:

    I think the LDs will be more stunned by their shocker in Somerset than the WoE mayoralty. They weren't expecting that at all. Chickens coming home to roost...

    Tessa Munt took Wells by looks of things though. Good for the GE?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,282
    SeanT said:

    Having finally worked out how to download it to Google Sheets (I think), I have to say RobD's spreadsheet is legendary. Bravo.

    Direct link here - https://goo.gl/uzcozl (think it might be also hidden in the thread header)
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,000

    Labrokes are 16-1 though
    No they're not, @Shadsy has wisely cut to 5-1.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Nuneaton: Tories were about 20% ahead compared to 10% at GE2015.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,795
    kle4 said:

    You'd think with Tories hoovering up the ukip vote and accused of doing so with ukip policies, that Con would lose a bit more from the wetter among their ranks, but doesn't seem like all that many are jumping ship. Another terrible omen for LDs of ukippy Tories aren't losing the liberal Tory vote.

    But time for counting. Au revoir

    Problem is for the anti-tories is that those 'wetter' Tories, are mostly likely to pro-business and educated. They aren't going to go for the left.

    They might go for a new-labourish centreish party, but that doesn't exist (at the moment).
  • ProdicusProdicus Posts: 658

    Anthony Howard?
    Good man. For a lefty.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    Interesting. Weren't most people predicting a lower turnout?
    Some pundits were but I don't know what they were basing it on.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,884
    kle4 said:

    Circumstance and luck with, so far, just the right tone of appeal to take advantage.
    Referendum vote and Tory swing to the far right destroyed them , May had only a little to do with it.
  • JonWCJonWC Posts: 289

    Tessa Munt took Wells by looks of things though. Good for the GE?
    No. That is only one division amongst many in that seat. I imagine the activists will be wandering dazed in the Mendips for days to come. Having been kicked hard in the Quantocks..
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,972

    Interesting. Weren't most people predicting a lower turnout?
    5% thought it was the General yesterday?
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,420
    HYUFD said:

    Overall so far looks like a good night for the Tories, poor for Labour, mixed for LDs and terrible for UKIP

    Shouldn't that be "terrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrible for UKIP"? :D
  • brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    AndyJS said:

    Some pundits were but I don't know what they were basing it on.
    Brenda from Bristol.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069

    Just watching Prof. Curtice on the BBC. Can he not afford a haircut? ;)

    https://twitter.com/johncurticeontv?lang=en
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,143
    AndyJS said:

    Except in Bridgend and Wrexham where the Tories did well. Cardiff and Newport were better for Labour.
    Bridgend and Wrexham voted Leave, Cardiff Remain and Swansea only a very narrow Leave
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,803

    Clegg to lose???
    Labour put in a massive effort last time, and this time won't. Some of those voters will come across to the LDs.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,294
    Mr. Eagles, cheers for that answer.

    Mr. Pulpstar, good thinking, Batman.

    Currently, I feel my various bets that mean I'm green if the Lib Dems get under 40 seats may prove green.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,884
    edited May 2017
    JackW said:

    Now my ARSE is in retirement, much like Prince Phil - full 24 page pullout out today in the Auchentennach Bugle of my rear wonderment, will you be providing a Turnip-ometer for the general election ?
    Good thinking Jack , if only I had the time.
    PS: Or was any good at technology, still a paper and ink man.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,000

    Mr. Eagles, cheers for that answer.

    Mr. Pulpstar, good thinking, Batman.

    Currently, I feel my various bets that mean I'm green if the Lib Dems get under 40 seats may prove green.

    Lib Dem sub 40 is an almost certain winner. Top up sub 20 generally, and particularly sub 10.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,884

    Just watching Prof. Curtice on the BBC. Can he not afford a haircut? ;)

    Or even a comb
  • glwglw Posts: 10,250

    Problem is for the anti-tories is that those 'wetter' Tories, are mostly likely to pro-business and educated. They aren't going to go for the left.

    They might go for a new-labourish centreish party, but that doesn't exist (at the moment).
    Exactly, these Tory wets would have to be soaking to vote for the so-called Liberal Democrats or Corbyn led Labour.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    If you want to get rid of it, simply replace it with another.

    "I'm a Barbie girl in a Barbie world" usually does the trick.
    Sadist
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,000
    edited May 2017
    HYUFD said:

    Bridgend and Wrexham voted Leave, Cardiff Remain and Swansea only a very narrow Leave
    Swansea East was the most leave seat in the whole of Wales.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,294
    Mr. Pulpstar, I'll have to check the odds first.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,972
    edited May 2017

    No, bad for Labour but nowhere near that bad.

    Wales has yet to kick Labour in the balls over the NHS. That's next month...
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,000

    Mr. Pulpstar, I'll have to check the odds first.

    365, 9-1 sub 10.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited May 2017
    After that West of England result the Tories must be strong favourites in the West Midlands. Greater Manchester will be interesting. I can't believe Burnham might lose.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,000
    edited May 2017
    AndyJS said:

    After that West of England result the Tories must be strong favourites in the West Midlands. Greater Manchester will be interesting. I can't believe Burnham might lose.

    Blimey - that's an ominous post for Labour if ever there was one.

    Mayorals will be higher turnout than the locals or not ?
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    My strike zone is LD 10-29. Green under ten as well but 1/5th of the 10-29 band. I will fix that today.
  • brokenwheelbrokenwheel Posts: 3,352
    edited May 2017
    AndyJS said:

    After that West of England result the Tories must be strong favourites in the West Midlands. Greater Manchester will be interesting. I can't believe Burnham might lose.

    From the results we've seen I don't think the Labour vote is soft enough for Burnham to lose. The Labour vote share would need to be at least at 2010 levels for a chance.
  • Scrapheap_as_wasScrapheap_as_was Posts: 10,069
    Pulpstar said:

    No they're not, @Shadsy has wisely cut to 5-1.
    I've just had £10 on it at 16s!
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,420

    Yes, though to be fair after seeing how some people plan to use their second vote i'm not sure how it works has effectively been communicated. It only matters if your 1st preference isn't in the final two and your 2nd preference likely is, otherwise it is pointless.
    Apologies if this has already been pointed out, but only 39% of the potential second preferences in the West of England Mayoral Election actually counted towards the result. You have to think that had the Lib Dems beaten Labour into second then they'd have won.
  • TonyTony Posts: 159

    No. They took out the studenty bits before 2010.

    Most of the senior academic staff of the two universities live in Sheffield Hallam though.
    Lots of student house shares in Hallam though, my daughter's in one.
  • mattmatt Posts: 3,789
    Scott_P said:

    @BBCNormanS: Labour will do better as @jeremycorbyn gets more airtime says @johnmcdonnellMP #ge17 #le2017

    LOL

    Laugh but McDonnell is a very impressive media operator (or accomplished liar, take your choice).
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,168

    From the results we've seen I don't think the Labour vote is soft enough for Burnham to lose.
    Turnout is close to 30% which isn't as bad as feared, should help Burnham.
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 10,005
    JonWC said:

    No. That is only one division amongst many in that seat. I imagine the activists will be wandering dazed in the Mendips for days to come. Having been kicked hard in the Quantocks..
    I think that the LibDem vote will be up generally from 8% come the GE but if they have any sense they will target on places like Wells, Cheltenham, St Albans and Eastleigh where they stand a chance. Some of these are giving good odds and I'm investing a few pounds.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,803

    From the results we've seen I don't think the Labour vote is soft enough for Burnham to lose. The Labour vote share would need to be at least at 2010 levels for a chance.
    Reports from the verification suggest he looks OK
  • SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    new thread
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    glw said:

    Exactly, these Tory wets would have to be soaking to vote for the so-called Liberal Democrats or Corbyn led Labour.
    Where can I go? Labour seems hell bent on disappearing up its own fundament. The Liberal Democrats have wrapped themselves (pointlessly) in the EU flag, which is not a good enough reason to vote for them. For the first time in my life I'm contemplating abstaining.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,394
    Pulpstar said:

    Blimey - that's an ominous post for Labour if ever there was one.

    Mayorals will be higher turnout than the locals or not ?
    My guess would be lower. There has been zero campaigning that I've seen on Teesside (although admittedly Darlington is at the far end of the region) and even my wife wasn't that bothered about voting - and she even voted in the police commissioners election (admittedly that had more publicity).
  • Bob__SykesBob__Sykes Posts: 1,179
    Pulpstar said:

    Blimey - that's an ominous post for Labour if ever there was one.

    Mayorals will be higher turnout than the locals or not ?
    I'd love it not to have the Scouse failed Labour politician controlling many aspects of my day to day life (in many ways he will have more impact on me than anything Mrs May does or doesn't do), but I am resigned to him winning comfortably. I saw McDonnell on BBC1 a minute or two ago turning the focus to "let's wait and see what happens in the north west of England, that is where many key marginals are, that is where Mrs May has been focussing her campaigning" so I took that as meaning Labour think GM and Merseyside are both comfortably in the bag.

    And they surely both are.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,294
    I thought now might be a good time for a periodical re-posting of Morris Dancer's Wonderful List of Labour Possibilities, Arranged and Compared to Historical Battlefield Performances of the Roman Empire:
    -100 Adrianople [Malmesbury]
    -90 Cap Bon [Malmesbury’s suggestion]
    -80 Allia [another_richard’s suggestion]

    -70 Cannae
    -60 Arausio
    -50 Teutoberg Forest
    -40 Carrhae
    -30 Lake Trasimene

    If it's not too bad:
    -20 Asculum
    -10 Heraclea

    And, if Labour actually increase their seat numbers:
    +10 Zela
    +20 Tigranocerta
    +30 Zama
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 64,641
    Lyuben Vachkov‏ @VLubev 19h19 hours ago

    Replying to @DentiumInfernum @philipjcowley
    I've already bet £500 on Labour to move the betting markets and change the narrative. Looking forward to a handsome return on my money.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,168

    NEW THREAD

  • JonWCJonWC Posts: 289

    I think that the LibDem vote will be up generally from 8% come the GE but if they have any sense they will target on places like Wells, Cheltenham, St Albans and Eastleigh where they stand a chance. Some of these are giving good odds and I'm investing a few pounds.
    The Tories had to weigh their votes in a number of the other Wells constituency divisions. Tessa Munt just squeaked home and the LDs picked up one of the seats in a two-member seat in Glastonbury. And that's it. It would take a minor miracle to turn that around.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,803
    On Labourlist the knives are out for the MPs already and several posters are suggesting the solution is to stand Momentum Corbynite candidates against moderate Labour MPs in the GE to get rid of them!
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 126,143
    Pulpstar said:

    Swansea East was the most leave seat in the whole of Wales.
    Swansea as a whole only voted 51% Leave
  • TravelgallTravelgall Posts: 33
    murali_s said:

    But will that de-toxify the Tories at some point. Discuss....
    Will it detoxify their brand in the Metropolitan areas where Labour's Diversity Outreach co-ordinator vote lives - almost certainly not. They will continue to say "But why don't the people understand, the poor fools, Socialism is the answer". Ditto the "We should stay in the EU because Waitrose will run out of Organic Tapenade". But that demographic is split with the Liberal Democrats.

    2ndly nor do I believe will it affect their BME 1st/2nd Generation vote. But even there seeing Kemi Badenoch stand up and represent (and she almost certainly will) the distinctly un "Street" Saffron Waldon with its 98% white vote. I believe that many BME voters will look at that and say to themselves "well both sides want my vote, both sides represent me, it's just that one side will choose Dianne Abbot to represent me, the other side Major James Cleverly MP TD". The UK at present isn't the UK of 1980's skinheads despite some problems remaining and this will affect the BME ABC1 and possibly C2 vote.

    The 3rd bit of Labour's core vote - Emily Thornberry's Van vote North of Watford Gap is gone, forget about it (South of it it was always people who welled up when they thought of Mrs Thatcher PBUH). They are no longer looking at Eton & Oxbridge graduates whose wives either "Lunch" or Design Leather Clad notepads, they are looking at a cabinet with regional accents. There are a greater number of Upper Class remaining in the Conservatives, but the kind of Upper Classes who were Platoon commanders to their great grandfather at Passchendale. The British working class like Multi Generational Posh people who consider themselves their servants a la Jacob Rees Mogg, not Ghastly Nouveau Riche Chattering classes - Viz whatever Soap Opera / TV presenter / Human Rights Barrister / Red Prince (Oooh Guacamole) Labour chuck into their Electoral Seat. Nor do they want somebody who believes they are elected to act as their University Lecturer - see pretty much all the Liberal Democrats.

    The 4th is also gone. UKIP will continue to act as a Lodestone to tinfoil hat wearers & E Grades. Decide for yourself where those who previously made the Tories as huggable as an Ebola patient to group 2 and 3 will go.
  • TravelgallTravelgall Posts: 33
    At the end of the day, nothing lasts forever. I believe we will get a Whig party back to counter the Tories made of mainstream Labour & Liberal Democrat MP's, with the rump Judean Peoples Popular Front keeping the assets of all those Labour Working men's clubs that will increasingly look like Pripyat save the odd Momentum friends of Palestine meeting and an invite to the South Armagh active service unit to celebrate their struggle. But by the time it has happened the dust will have settled, the UK will have signed its Free Trade agreements with Korea, Australia et all. And even if it survives the EU will look like its founders envisaged - a United States of Europe proudly waving its Star Spangled Sphincter and Bizantine Bureaucracy in the face of a World that has moved on from a Feather bedded populace.
This discussion has been closed.