politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » NEW PB/Polling Matters podcast: Firing the starting gun, Brexit rows & where is the LD surge?
On this week’s podcast, Keiran is joined by Adam Drummond of Opinium and Adam Payne of Business Insider UK to discuss the political state of play as the General Election campaign proper kicks off.
@BBCNewsnight: TONIGHT: @nick_clegg says EU could adopt “less than reasonable positions” in response to “belligerent combative language” from UK government pic.twitter.com/hEXfkc81PO
Listening to the actual podcast ep 100, I agree with the point about the Labour campaign being relatively policy heavy so far, and Corbyn himself a fairly sound start (though a poll says otherwise - but that's probably due to him not being liked). It is right Labour are not down in the doldrums, remarkably.
And as much as I think the reaction to May today has been overblown even though I didn't like what she said, I enjoyed the contrast with the point that the perception of her going in to the campaign is 'calm and sensible'.
I wonder if the Lib Dems are looking at a total wipe out in England. I watched Nick Clegg on TV yesterday and thought he was a giant compared to Farron. My thoughts about Farron have been to give him the benefit of the doubt and look for the best in him but he does not strike me as someone with any "Bottom". Indeed, he might of taken something of a safe Tory seat and represented in a way the voters like but he stretches credibility as much as Corbyn as being a potential PM. I suspect this is why the opinion polls are showing solid Tory leads.
Baxtering this, I see that Thangam Debbonaire loses Bristol W to the Greens. I don't know anything about her and her policies, but it would be a shame to lose a name like that from Westminster
Much lower than some other Labour scores lately. Which are right? I find the Tories being double Lab incredible, but I cannot rule out merely because it seems so strange, but higher 20s seems more regular the past week or so.
Much lower than some other Labour scores lately. Which are right? I find the Tories being double Lab incredible, but I cannot rule out merely because it seems so strange, but higher 20s seems more regular the past week or so.
Very good Con poll - and this was before May 'wrapped herself in the Union Jack', I assume.
Baxtering this, I see that Thangam Debbonaire loses Bristol W to the Greens. I don't know anything about her and her policies, but it would be a shame to lose a name like that from Westminster
I don't think the calculation works for the Greens because their national rating is so small.
@BBCNewsnight: TONIGHT: @nick_clegg says EU could adopt “less than reasonable positions” in response to “belligerent combative language” from UK government pic.twitter.com/hEXfkc81PO
I voted Remain in 2016. But Nick Clegg is playing with fire. I would always support a UK government over a foreign institution, government or other supranational entity. I think Remain voters by and large have moved on now apart from a small and diminishing band of people. I know I certainly have and could be as belligerent as any other Remainer annoyed with the result. Time to move on to the future instead of debating the past.
Sounds like a fiery debate, and quite entertaining, in its way. I suppose Le Pen has no choice but to swing hard, given how far behind she is.
It's not that good. But I'm watching the dubbed English version. I suspect it loses a great deal in the translation. My French isn't good enough to watch it without the voiceover.
@BBCNewsnight: TONIGHT: @nick_clegg says EU could adopt “less than reasonable positions” in response to “belligerent combative language” from UK government pic.twitter.com/hEXfkc81PO
I voted Remain in 2016. But Nick Clegg is playing with fire. I would always support a UK government over a foreign institution, government or other supranational entity. I think Remain voters by and large have moved on now apart from a small and diminishing band of people. I know I certainly have and could be as belligerent as any other Remainer annoyed with the result. Time to move on to the future instead of debating the past.
The other problem is that many people, rightly or wrongly, will perceive the EU as already having been less than reasonable, so won't think it will happen in response to TMay's language (and as discussed that makes no sense anyway, people don't base their major international positions based on poor language in one speech), but already the case.
Le Pen taunts Macron for having gone to Merkel to ask for her blessing.
France will be run by a woman after the election. Me or Mrs Merkel.
Whatever you think of her and her policies, that is a great line.
That is a great line, but suspiciously good to have been a spur of the moment statement. I expect that makes a few front pages, it's too good not to use.
@BBCNewsnight: TONIGHT: @nick_clegg says EU could adopt “less than reasonable positions” in response to “belligerent combative language” from UK government pic.twitter.com/hEXfkc81PO
I voted Remain in 2016. But Nick Clegg is playing with fire. I would always support a UK government over a foreign institution, government or other supranational entity. I think Remain voters by and large have moved on now apart from a small and diminishing band of people. I know I certainly have and could be as belligerent as any other Remainer annoyed with the result. Time to move on to the future instead of debating the past.
There's plenty of fair analysis and criticism from Remainers. But Clegg really is a complete twat.
Much lower than some other Labour scores lately. Which are right? I find the Tories being double Lab incredible, but I cannot rule out merely because it seems so strange, but higher 20s seems more regular the past week or so.
Very good Con poll - and this was before May 'wrapped herself in the Union Jack', I assume.
Dan Hannan on Sky tonight asking why Corbyn, Farron and Sturgeon are all attacking the PM and standing up for Junckers and Brussels.
This could be far more serious for the ' coaltion of chaos'. It plays right into TM hands and will be repeated time after time.
The leakers in the EU thought it would destabilize TM but all they have done is unite the vast majority behind her
Cheers, can't see it on the old thread but only did a cursory search for 'panelbase'
The search function only works for the number of pages you have open, so unless you open all the comments to the beginning of a thread, it will miss some.
Sounds like a fiery debate, and quite entertaining, in its way. I suppose Le Pen has no choice but to swing hard, given how far behind she is.
It's not that good. But I'm watching the dubbed English version. I suspect it loses a great deal in the translation. My French isn't good enough to watch it without the voiceover.
The thing is debates are rarely informative on policy terms, so it's all about the zingers, the gaffes, the tone, and the body language - none of which works well with instant interpretation (where they don't have the time to try and mimic these characteristics like if it was dubbed after the time).
Suggestion in podcast that public presently buying government line that no deal is better than a bad deal, but makes the fair point that we don't know what the public's reaction to a specific deal or no deal would be.
Somewhat surprised at the less than hysterical discussion about TMay's statements, comparison to boxing trash talk. 'Just electioneering' seems like the conclusion.
Comments
http://www.francetvinfo.fr/elections/presidentielle/direct-presidentielle-le-debat-emmanuel-macron-marine-le-pen-du-2eme-tour-a-suivre-en-live-sur-france-2-et-tf1_2173168.html
This is fiery stuff.
Quelle surprise!
Conservatives 48% (+2)
Labour 24% (-)
LibDems 11% (-)
UKIP 7% (-1)
And as much as I think the reaction to May today has been overblown even though I didn't like what she said, I enjoyed the contrast with the point that the perception of her going in to the campaign is 'calm and sensible'.
Ok.
Con 47%
Lab 30%
LD 10%
UKIP 5%
28 Apr - 02 May
https://kpedley.podbean.com/e/polling-matters-episode-100-firing-the-starting-gun-brexit-rows-and-where-is-the-lib-dem-surge/
Labour 300,000%
LDems -0%
Others 30p
Abbott Research, conducted 2/5/17 - 80m were interviewed.
DaveHillOnLondon (@DaveHill)
03/05/2017, 10:41
Heroine of #ukip ultras 'not ratified' by party as #Lewisham candidate: onlondon.co.uk/2017/05/02/ele… #Nuttall curbs extremists, shock? #GE2017
This could be far more serious for the ' coaltion of chaos'. It plays right into TM hands and will be repeated time after time.
The leakers in the EU thought it would destabilize TM but all they have done is unite the vast majority behind her
Re Farron
Elections need to be about character not policies - you can never predicte the decisions they will face
He clearly believes gay sex (although differentiating between that and homosexuality sexuality is classic Anglican sophistry @foxinsox ) is wrong.
That, for me, makes him toxic
Relatedly, today is the first day it feels as if Theresa is Maggie T redux all over again, for reasons beyond the fact that she's a female PM.
But we know that when Diane says 300,000 she really means 300,000,000, so I guess that is the real Labour score.
Shame the LDs are stuck in 'negative growth'
Nice to know somebody out there loves us.
Somewhat surprised at the less than hysterical discussion about TMay's statements, comparison to boxing trash talk. 'Just electioneering' seems like the conclusion.