politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Labour’s challenge in retaining Stoke Central is equal if not greater than in Copeland
I was one of the lucky ones and managed to get £20 on the LDs at Ladbrokes Stoke Central market when the odds were 50/1. That’s now moved in sharply to 7/1 which I think is still reasonable value.
Are there any markets on how low a share of the vote the winner will have. (Or even actual number of votes for the winner given the expected low turnout as well... - could be ridiculously low)
To come from 4.2% to win the seat would be an amazing result for the LDs!
That was in the special circumstances of the coalition. The world has changed and the LDs are winning all over the place. In Sunderland last night they went from 4% in 2015 to 45%.
Looking at the numbers - if you assume a 28% turnout, and that the winner gets 28% in a tight four way contest - that would be just 5,000 votes required....
I'm expecting a fairly comfortable Labour hold. Nothing in this Parliament's by-elections suggests anything different as yet. Meanwhile, Betfair is heading towards evens on Labour taking this seat. Seems like great value to me.
A sublime 15 minutes from one of the West's most significant public intellectuals Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks. It's about the politics of Covenant in the US but it also made me a bit teary about our EU referendum.
To come from 4.2% to win the seat would be an amazing result for the LDs!
That was in the special circumstances of the coalition. The world has changed and the LDs are winning all over the place. In Sunderland last night they went from 4% in 2015 to 45%.
And they don't have to reach 45% in Stoke, anything above 30% probably wins it for them.
I'm expecting a fairly comfortable Labour hold. Nothing in this Parliament's by-elections suggests anything different as yet. Meanwhile, Betfair is heading towards evens on Labour taking this seat. Seems like great value to me.
To come from 4.2% to win the seat would be an amazing result for the LDs!
That was in the special circumstances of the coalition. The world has changed and the LDs are winning all over the place. In Sunderland last night they went from 4% in 2015 to 45%.
If Leavers can't be arsed (and many voted in the referendum for the first in years, if ever), then LD may have a chance.
The lower the turnout the more important the PV operation will be. PV operations are tilted towards local incumbencies. Who held held/holds Stoke Central's MP/Councillor base ?
Slightly counter intuitive, but if LibDems campaign hard on a Remain stance in Stoke, it will motivate UKIP to get out Leave voters. Probably not a great strategy in a big Leave area.
One open question is how the Conservatives will approach this seat. They were a whisker behind UKIP last time. Might they choose to soft pedal in order to give UKIP more of a chance?
I'd have thought not. First, they might want to keep Mr Corbyn more secure, so they would not want to maximise the chances of another party winning. Secondly and probably more importantly, there are other seats in the area where they would see themselves as the primary challengers rather than UKIP and they wouldn't want to give the signal in those constituencies that UKIP were a local force.
So UKIP are unlikely to get a free pass from the blue team.
I'm expecting a fairly comfortable Labour hold. Nothing in this Parliament's by-elections suggests anything different as yet. Meanwhile, Betfair is heading towards evens on Labour taking this seat. Seems like great value to me.
I think so too. I will wait to see who the candidates will be though. It seems a rather feverish market at present.
7/1 is still "reasonable value" on the Lib Dems? It's a view. Congrats on the 50/1 though.
Any local thoughts?
Is there going to be an independent again? Breeze did in 2015 at 6.8% in a GE.
TBH I work there rather than live there, so this is a bit like asking a Canary Wharf commuter from Chelmsford their opinion on Poplar and Limehouse.
The area is on the up, but from a very low base. Locals have clearly been disillusioned with Labour for a long time. The council is now run by a Ind/Con/UKIP coalition and I suppose the Ind council leader might fancy a run (I have no in-depth knowledge on this).
One open question is how the Conservatives will approach this seat. They were a whisker behind UKIP last time. Might they choose to soft pedal in order to give UKIP more of a chance?
I'd have thought not. First, they might want to keep Mr Corbyn more secure, so they would not want to maximise the chances of another party winning. Secondly and probably more importantly, there are other seats in the area where they would see themselves as the primary challengers rather than UKIP and they wouldn't want to give the signal in those constituencies that UKIP were a local force.
So UKIP are unlikely to get a free pass from the blue team.
The early money says the Cons are the raqgs here. I'd have thought they'd rather a Leave MP than a hardcore remainer
One open question is how the Conservatives will approach this seat. They were a whisker behind UKIP last time. Might they choose to soft pedal in order to give UKIP more of a chance?
I'd have thought not. First, they might want to keep Mr Corbyn more secure, so they would not want to maximise the chances of another party winning. Secondly and probably more importantly, there are other seats in the area where they would see themselves as the primary challengers rather than UKIP and they wouldn't want to give the signal in those constituencies that UKIP were a local force.
So UKIP are unlikely to get a free pass from the blue team.
Correct. The Tories don't want another UKIP threat emerging to them again post Brexit.
I also think Theresa May thinks those votes are her votes (or, at least, they should be) so will fight for them.
7/1 is still "reasonable value" on the Lib Dems? It's a view. Congrats on the 50/1 though.
Any local thoughts?
Is there going to be an independent again? Breeze did in 2015 at 6.8% in a GE.
TBH I work there rather than live there, so this is a bit like asking a Canary Wharf commuter from Chelmsford their opinion on Poplar and Limehouse.
The area is on the up, but from a very low base. Locals have clearly been disillusioned with Labour for a long time. The council is now run by a Ind/Con/UKIP coalition and I suppose the Ind council leader might fancy a run (I have no in-depth knowledge on this).
I can have a go at that Poplar & Limehouse question from a commuters point of view!
One open question is how the Conservatives will approach this seat. They were a whisker behind UKIP last time. Might they choose to soft pedal in order to give UKIP more of a chance?
I'd have thought not. First, they might want to keep Mr Corbyn more secure, so they would not want to maximise the chances of another party winning. Secondly and probably more importantly, there are other seats in the area where they would see themselves as the primary challengers rather than UKIP and they wouldn't want to give the signal in those constituencies that UKIP were a local force.
So UKIP are unlikely to get a free pass from the blue team.
The early money says the Cons are the raqgs here. I'd have thought they'd rather a Leave MP than a hardcore remainer
Pretty sure we'll be campaigning pretty hard, for the reasons Alastair gives. But UKIP v Lab is the 'natural' framing (partly because of those extra 33 votes at GE2015!)
The other issue is timing. If it's on the same day as Copeland then Stoke becomes more competitive simply because it's so so much easier for activists and journalists to get to. And the two smaller parties will have to pick one to target. Almost certainly Stoke as they have better historical bases there. I'd have thought that would take the pressure off Copeland Labour slightly. I suppose it comes down to other parties willingness to move the writs. It certainly suits Labour to wait till May 4th. Does anyone know for Stoke has council elections that day ? I assume it's a unitary ?
The other issue is timing. If it's on the same day as Copeland then Stoke becomes more competitive simply because it's so so much easier for activists and journalists to get to. And the two smaller parties will have to pick one to target. Almost certainly Stoke as they have better historical bases their. I'd has thought that would take the pressure off Copeland Labour slightly. I suppose it comes down to other parties willingness to move the writs. It certainly suits Labour to wait till May 4th. Does anyone know for Stoke has council elections that day ? I assume it's a unitary ?
No local elections in Stoke this year. Copeland will have the Cumbria county council election.
One open question is how the Conservatives will approach this seat. They were a whisker behind UKIP last time. Might they choose to soft pedal in order to give UKIP more of a chance?
I'd have thought not. First, they might want to keep Mr Corbyn more secure, so they would not want to maximise the chances of another party winning. Secondly and probably more importantly, there are other seats in the area where they would see themselves as the primary challengers rather than UKIP and they wouldn't want to give the signal in those constituencies that UKIP were a local force.
So UKIP are unlikely to get a free pass from the blue team.
The early money says the Cons are the raqgs here. I'd have thought they'd rather a Leave MP than a hardcore remainer
Pretty sure we'll be campaigning pretty hard, for the reasons Alastair gives. But UKIP v Lab is the 'natural' framing (partly because of those extra 33 votes at GE2015!)
All in all a very interesting betting heat indeed I would say!
there is a significant student vote in central stoke on trent serving Keele, Staffordshire Poly. I think 50/1 for LD's is a great bet given the council election result last night in sunderland. i would unscientifically put them at 3/1. I think that the minority remain vote will turn out religiously for the LD's. It is Labour's to lose and UKIP are the wild cards. Interesting times indeed.
Labour are actually only polling 4 points or so down on where they ended up in 2015... That reduction might well be lower in core labour seats. Then add in the fact that there is no main challenger to collect votes against labour - it won't be like Richmond Park where it was clearly a two horse race.
Slightly counter intuitive, but if LibDems campaign hard on a Remain stance in Stoke, it will motivate UKIP to get out Leave voters. Probably not a great strategy in a big Leave area.
You mean it will motivate Leave voters to split away from Labour or the Tories? Sounds like a sound strategy to me.
Have any of the writs been moved? Another possible variable here, given others are supposedly thinking about resigning as MPs (but they always say that don't they?) is whether Labour could end up calling x by-elections on the same day, forcing all the parties to choose which constituencies to carpet bomb with activists.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Have any of the writs been moved? Another possible variable here, given others are supposedly thinking about resigning as MPs (but they always say that don't they?) is whether Labour could end up calling x by-elections on the same day, forcing all the parties to choose which constituencies to carpet bomb with activists.
Dunno about you, but I'm stockpiling the Blue Nun!
Technical picture question: in early stages of trying to put together a print edition of Kingdom Asunder and one gripe the automatic thingummyjig throws up is low DPI (dots per inch) on the pictures involved (one [truncated] map, two family trees [just text I've shifted through 90 degrees]).
Have any of the writs been moved? Another possible variable here, given others are supposedly thinking about resigning as MPs (but they always say that don't they?) is whether Labour could end up calling x by-elections on the same day, forcing all the parties to choose which constituencies to carpet bomb with activists.
The whole PLP could resign en masse and force a mini-GE. Not sure what's in it for them but it would be fun to watch...
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Mike...Would you be interested in a bet on who gets more votes... Lib Dems or UKIP in this by election? I think UKIP....
I see an independent did okay (beat the Lib Dems and kept his deposit) in Stoke Central at the 2015 GE. That could definitely mix things up is someone gets a bit of momentum.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Mike...Would you be interested in a bet on who gets more votes... Lib Dems or UKIP in this by election? I think UKIP....
Shadsy often puts up such a market, and also on % shares.
It is rare to lose money betting against the kippers.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
No one clued up though they had a chance in Oldham
And although everyone here thought they were over priced in the Clacton and Rochester by elections last parliament, they were in fact big value.
Also in Heywood and Middleton where they lost by 600 votes and were 14/1
So to say they are always over priced is just plain wrong
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Mike...Would you be interested in a bet on who gets more votes... Lib Dems or UKIP in this by election? I think UKIP....
Shadsy often puts up such a market, and also on % shares.
It is rare to lose money betting against the kippers.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Oldham West was in hindsight a very UKIP unfriendly seat with the large Pakistani populus there. I thought so initially, those reports of Lab getting turned away on the doorstep threw us all right off though.
Copeland is a very low chance as they finished a distant third - I've laid them for four figures there.
I think Sunderland last night had some local factors quite honestly...
This looks by far their best shot in a long old time.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
No one clued up though they had a chance in Oldham
Strikes me that if they can't win Stoke Central then all this about 'taking the North from Labour' is absolute rot. It must be their best chance by miles given John Harris' reports from the frontline.
"Mr Corbyn is facing up to six by-elections this year, with other contests in Leigh, where Andy Burnham is quitting to stand for mayor of Greater Manchester, and in Liverpool Walton, where Steve Rotheram is leaving to stand for mayor of Liverpool. There are also concerns among the Parliamentary Labour party that two other MPs could stand down this year because of ill health."
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Mike...Would you be interested in a bet on who gets more votes... Lib Dems or UKIP in this by election? I think UKIP....
Shadsy often puts up such a market, and also on % shares.
It is rare to lose money betting against the kippers.
I don't have an account with them. Happy to bet with you if you want?
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
You could argue that it won the most significant vote in many years mind you.
I generally agree though, but it feels dangerous to lay ukip when Labour are weak. Of course the reality is that it's only ever proved dangerous to lay ukip where the Tories are weak.
LDs seem to be doing great things, but its pretty clear that its not Farron, and its pretty hard to work out what it might be.
I think Stoke will finish up as safe Labour - Hunt hardly represented the community, but Copeland I think will go Tory on the basis of Corbyn. In both seats I think 'Any other' at very long odds is a good bet. This is precisely the right electoral time for someone to try to make a splash with a new party.
I find myself with quite a lot of open bets at the moment.
I see an independent did okay (beat the Lib Dems and kept his deposit) in Stoke Central at the 2015 GE. That could definitely mix things up is someone gets a bit of momentum.
That was a well-known local Labour activist who was cross about Hunt being drafted in from London. Bit like what happened in Blaenau Gwent, which has now gone back to Labour.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
No one clued up though they had a chance in Oldham
Strikes me that if they can't win Stoke Central then all this about 'taking the North from Labour' is absolute rot. It must be their best chance by miles given John Harris' reports from the frontline.
UKIP post-referendum have utterly failed to articulate what they stand for rather than against. Nuttall's call to bring back blue passports and crowns on pint glasses sums up their irrelevance.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
No one clued up though they had a chance in Oldham
Strikes me that if they can't win Stoke Central then all this about 'taking the North from Labour' is absolute rot. It must be their best chance by miles given John Harris' reports from the frontline.
They should be expected to do well here I agree. If they don't it will be v disappointing. The others Mike lists are nonsense.
I loved the write up on here when the lib Dems came 2nd in Witney!!! Praise was heaped upon them, yet When Ukip used to do that it was an abject failure!
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
No one clued up though they had a chance in Oldham
Strikes me that if they can't win Stoke Central then all this about 'taking the North from Labour' is absolute rot. It must be their best chance by miles given John Harris' reports from the frontline.
UKIP post-referendum have utterly failed to articulate what they stand for rather than against. Nuttall's call to bring back blue passports and crowns on pint glasses sums up their irrelevance.
are they still saying that I will need to wear a tie when I got to the theatre?
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Oldham West was in hindsight a very UKIP unfriendly seat with the large Pakistani populus there. I thought so initially, those reports of Lab getting turned away on the doorstep threw us all right off though.
Copeland is a very low chance as they finished a distant third - I've laid them for four figures there.
I think Sunderland last night had some local factors quite honestly...
This looks by far their best shot in a long old time.
The local factors in Sunderland last night should have helped UKIP. They failed.
UKIP has yet to prove itself able in FPTP elections.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Mike...Would you be interested in a bet on who gets more votes... Lib Dems or UKIP in this by election? I think UKIP....
I don't do bets with people on the site after a bad experience which cost me £500 some years ago. Because of who I am I'd have to honour the bet. The arsehole who lost simply disappeared.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Oldham West was in hindsight a very UKIP unfriendly seat with the large Pakistani populus there. I thought so initially, those reports of Lab getting turned away on the doorstep threw us all right off though.
Copeland is a very low chance as they finished a distant third - I've laid them for four figures there.
I think Sunderland last night had some local factors quite honestly...
This looks by far their best shot in a long old time.
Yes.
And things have moved on.
Corbyn is no longer the fresh new leader. Brexit has been voted for, yet not delivered.
Events of an Article 50 nature could move this result enormously.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Oldham West was in hindsight a very UKIP unfriendly seat with the large Pakistani populus there. I thought so initially, those reports of Lab getting turned away on the doorstep threw us all right off though.
Copeland is a very low chance as they finished a distant third - I've laid them for four figures there.
I think Sunderland last night had some local factors quite honestly...
This looks by far their best shot in a long old time.
UKIP's private polling a few days before voting in Oldham said they were with in a chance of winning.
IIRC UKIP were saying their private polling they had reduced Labour's lead from something like 35% to like 5% and the momentum was all going to UKIP.
The FT is reporting that Labour may face at least six by-elections this year. In addition to Copeland and Stoke Central, there'll be Leigh and Liverpool Walton after the Liverpool and Manchester mayoral elections (which Labour seems nailed on to win, of course,) and there are "also concerns among the Parliamentary Labour party that two other MPs could stand down this year because of ill health."
All of that's before we consider the possibility of any more Labour MPs finding something better to do elsewhere and throwing in the towel. Or any of the more sick or elderly ones succumbing to the scythe of mortality.
One wonders how frequently this has to happen before the public starts to notice the trend, and it becomes a running joke? The one thing more dangerous for Labour than being viewed as incompetent is to be regarded as genuinely ridiculous.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
No one clued up though they had a chance in Oldham
Strikes me that if they can't win Stoke Central then all this about 'taking the North from Labour' is absolute rot. It must be their best chance by miles given John Harris' reports from the frontline.
UKIP post-referendum have utterly failed to articulate what they stand for rather than against. Nuttall's call to bring back blue passports and crowns on pint glasses sums up their irrelevance.
are they still saying that I will need to wear a tie when I got to the theatre?
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Mike...Would you be interested in a bet on who gets more votes... Lib Dems or UKIP in this by election? I think UKIP....
Shadsy often puts up such a market, and also on % shares.
It is rare to lose money betting against the kippers.
I don't have an account with them. Happy to bet with you if you want?
I do bet on this site, but will wait for a date and the candidates. I may be willing closer to the time.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Oldham West was in hindsight a very UKIP unfriendly seat with the large Pakistani populus there. I thought so initially, those reports of Lab getting turned away on the doorstep threw us all right off though.
Copeland is a very low chance as they finished a distant third - I've laid them for four figures there.
I think Sunderland last night had some local factors quite honestly...
This looks by far their best shot in a long old time.
The local factors in Sunderland last night should have helped UKIP. They failed.
UKIP has yet to prove itself able in FPTP elections.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
At every by-election UKIP is always over-priced. Apart from defector/incumbents it has NEVER won a Westminster seat.
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Mike...Would you be interested in a bet on who gets more votes... Lib Dems or UKIP in this by election? I think UKIP....
I don't do bets with people on the site after a bad experience which cost me £500 some years ago. Because of who I am I'd have to honour the bet. The arsehole who lost simply disappeared.
Fair enough... I understand entirely.
Would it change your mind if I offered (as the more anonymous party) to transfer your winnings in advance of the result and relied on you to transfer them back (plus your losses) in the event I'm successful?
Left 47.1 (Lab/LD/Grn) Right 45.2 (Con/UKIP) Others 7.7
The Lib Dems are the only true small-c conservative vote at the moment when every other party is prepared to risk losing the single market.
lol
the single market vote isnt small c conservative, it's Big C Corporatist
The Single Market was Margaret Thatcher's finest achievement as Prime Minister, just ahead of her government's policies on grammar schools.
and what ?
you think Mrs T didnt call some things wrong ?
I doubt many people would have any problem with the Single Market, if they got rid of the free movement of people and introduced a more controlled approach.
Stoke-on-Trent central has a lot of students in it, two Universities are in this seat IIRC. I think UK poling report mentions 14% of the population are in full time higher education. Labour under Corbyn might appeal to this group of people as opposed to the 13% of the population that are retired. Only problem is the young don't vote in as high numbers as the old.
Stoke-on-Trent is not the horrible place it used to be, it has dramatically improved from the hell on earth it was in the 1960s! Still I would not want to live in that city!
The FT is reporting that Labour may face at least six by-elections this year. In addition to Copeland and Stoke Central, there'll be Leigh and Liverpool Walton after the Liverpool and Manchester mayoral elections (which Labour seems nailed on to win, of course,) and there are "also concerns among the Parliamentary Labour party that two other MPs could stand down this year because of ill health."
All of that's before we consider the possibility of any more Labour MPs finding something better to do elsewhere and throwing in the towel. Or any of the more sick or elderly ones succumbing to the scythe of mortality.
One wonders how frequently this has to happen before the public starts to notice the trend, and it becomes a running joke? The one thing more dangerous for Labour than being viewed as incompetent is to be regarded as genuinely ridiculous.
This is the email the Tories have sent out in the last hour, subject header 'Enough is enough'
This is a serious time for our country. And we need a strong, united Government that will deliver on the things that matter to people.
This week Labour have proven they can’t deliver and have shown just how out of touch, chaotic and incompetent they are.
You can help ensure a strong team across Britain by donating to our 2017 campaign today.
Five Days of Labour Chaos
On Monday, Labour said Jeremy Corbyn would give a speech in favour of controlling immigration.
On Tuesday, the Labour leader U-turned, saying that Labour will not take control over immigration; then told millions of strike-affected commuters he would stand with his union paymasters on the picket lines rather than stand up for them.
On Wednesday, Labour’s former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith told Corbyn’s team to “get your a***s in gear and stop embarrassing our party.”
On Thursday, Labour suggested that NATO should stop protecting Estonia from Russian aggression.
And today, Tristram Hunt - Labour MP and former shadow Education Secretary - announced he will quit Parliament.
The British people need a party who will speak for the ordinary working people of Britain and build a country that works for everyone. Labour can’t do it. Only the Conservatives will.
Donate to our campaign today and together we can build a country that works for everyone.
Comments
Is there going to be an independent again? Breeze did in 2015 at 6.8% in a GE.
https://youtu.be/Glrq6G-_L6w
Lab on Betfair v big, I agree with @AlastairMeeks... Never been anyone other than a Labour MP in this seat.. and nearly EVS???
I'd have thought not. First, they might want to keep Mr Corbyn more secure, so they would not want to maximise the chances of another party winning. Secondly and probably more importantly, there are other seats in the area where they would see themselves as the primary challengers rather than UKIP and they wouldn't want to give the signal in those constituencies that UKIP were a local force.
So UKIP are unlikely to get a free pass from the blue team.
Copeland
Tories +27.55
Labour +308.26
Green -95.98
Lib Dem +134.39
UKIP -1222.2
Someone else +276.23
Stoke On Trent North
Tories -109.58
Labour +70.22
Green -109.58
Lib Dem -109.58
UKIP -71.26
Someone else -109.58
DOUBLE !!
Lab Both £20 @ 3.1-1
The area is on the up, but from a very low base. Locals have clearly been disillusioned with Labour for a long time. The council is now run by a Ind/Con/UKIP coalition and I suppose the Ind council leader might fancy a run (I have no in-depth knowledge on this).
"A total of 81,563 people in his constituency voted 'Leave' and just 36,027 voted 'Remain.'"
Can this be right? By my reckoning that is 117,000 odd. Surely that is not one constituency? That is all of Stoke?
I also think Theresa May thinks those votes are her votes (or, at least, they should be) so will fight for them.
Big 300 seat Tory acca
Ta.
The BMG Richmond Park poll had Zac winning by 27%!
If it does cheer you up, BMG are now Labour's in house pollsters
(Sorry Mike Turner and anyone else from BMG reading that, I love you all really)
I think 50/1 for LD's is a great bet given the council election result last night in sunderland. i would unscientifically put them at 3/1. I think that the minority remain vote will turn out religiously for the LD's. It is Labour's to lose and UKIP are the wild cards.
Interesting times indeed.
That reduction might well be lower in core labour seats.
Then add in the fact that there is no main challenger to collect votes against labour - it won't be like Richmond Park where it was clearly a two horse race.
All that makes me think Labour hold.
Lab 4-6
UKIP 5-2
Lib Dems 10-1
Tories 15-1
Greens 100-1
If I was a bookie.
I'm running my own book on this though, so those prices aren't for offer.
https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jan/13/uber-lyft-cars-public-transport-cities-commuting
"What if Uber kills off public transport rather than cars?"
http://tinyurl.com/hf2w9hb
Remember Olddham West where leading pundits were saying UKIP was in with a real chance. They came in nearly 40% behind LAB which increased its majority.
At Sleaford in allegedly purple strong Lincs their vote share went down. At Witney they got just over 1/3 of their GE level and lost their deposit.
In local elections they've only retained 40% of the seats defended since last May.
Any ideas on improving the DPI?
It is rare to lose money betting against the kippers.
Their by election results in this parliament
Oldham W 23.4% (+2.8%)
Sheffield B 19.9% (-2.2%)
Ogmore 16.2% (+1.2%)
Sleaford 13.5% (-2.2%)
The remaining by elections are Tooting, Richmond, Witney and the walkover in Batley.
And although everyone here thought they were over priced in the Clacton and Rochester by elections last parliament, they were in fact big value.
Also in Heywood and Middleton where they lost by 600 votes and were 14/1
So to say they are always over priced is just plain wrong
Copeland is a very low chance as they finished a distant third - I've laid them for four figures there.
I think Sunderland last night had some local factors quite honestly...
This looks by far their best shot in a long old time.
"Mr Corbyn is facing up to six by-elections this year, with other contests in Leigh, where Andy Burnham is quitting to stand for mayor of Greater Manchester, and in Liverpool Walton, where Steve Rotheram is leaving to stand for mayor of Liverpool. There are also concerns among the Parliamentary Labour party that two other MPs could stand down this year because of ill health."
Happy to bet with you if you want?
I generally agree though, but it feels dangerous to lay ukip when Labour are weak. Of course the reality is that it's only ever proved dangerous to lay ukip where the Tories are weak.
LDs seem to be doing great things, but its pretty clear that its not Farron, and its pretty hard to work out what it might be.
I think Stoke will finish up as safe Labour - Hunt hardly represented the community, but Copeland I think will go Tory on the basis of Corbyn. In both seats I think 'Any other' at very long odds is a good bet. This is precisely the right electoral time for someone to try to make a splash with a new party.
I find myself with quite a lot of open bets at the moment.
I loved the write up on here when the lib Dems came 2nd in Witney!!! Praise was heaped upon them, yet When Ukip used to do that it was an abject failure!
Left 47.1 (Lab/LD/Grn)
Right 45.2 (Con/UKIP)
Others 7.7
UKIP has yet to prove itself able in FPTP elections. I don't do bets with people on the site after a bad experience which cost me £500 some years ago. Because of who I am I'd have to honour the bet. The arsehole who lost simply disappeared.
And things have moved on.
Corbyn is no longer the fresh new leader. Brexit has been voted for, yet not delivered.
Events of an Article 50 nature could move this result enormously.
IIRC UKIP were saying their private polling they had reduced Labour's lead from something like 35% to like 5% and the momentum was all going to UKIP.
We discussed Derbyshire on here a few weeks ago, it is a curious county.
It stretches from next to Manchester to Nottingham.
https://www.ft.com/content/806f89b2-d976-11e6-944b-e7eb37a6aa8e
All of that's before we consider the possibility of any more Labour MPs finding something better to do elsewhere and throwing in the towel. Or any of the more sick or elderly ones succumbing to the scythe of mortality.
One wonders how frequently this has to happen before the public starts to notice the trend, and it becomes a running joke? The one thing more dangerous for Labour than being viewed as incompetent is to be regarded as genuinely ridiculous.
the single market vote isnt small c conservative, it's Big C Corporatist
you think Mrs T didnt call some things wrong ?
Would it change your mind if I offered (as the more anonymous party) to transfer your winnings in advance of the result and relied on you to transfer them back (plus your losses) in the event I'm successful?
I was thinking say £20 or so...
https://twitter.com/TSEofPB/status/819971832900161537
Further information is here:
http://tinyurl.com/zbgf29x
Stoke-on-Trent is not the horrible place it used to be, it has dramatically improved from the hell on earth it was in the 1960s! Still I would not want to live in that city!
This is a serious time for our country. And we need a strong, united Government that will deliver on the things that matter to people.
This week Labour have proven they can’t deliver and have shown just how out of touch, chaotic and incompetent they are.
You can help ensure a strong team across Britain by donating to our 2017 campaign today.
Five Days of Labour Chaos
On Monday, Labour said Jeremy Corbyn would give a speech in favour of controlling immigration.
On Tuesday, the Labour leader U-turned, saying that Labour will not take control over immigration; then told millions of strike-affected commuters he would stand with his union paymasters on the picket lines rather than stand up for them.
On Wednesday, Labour’s former Home Secretary Jacqui Smith told Corbyn’s team to “get your a***s in gear and stop embarrassing our party.”
On Thursday, Labour suggested that NATO should stop protecting Estonia from Russian aggression.
And today, Tristram Hunt - Labour MP and former shadow Education Secretary - announced he will quit Parliament.
The British people need a party who will speak for the ordinary working people of Britain and build a country that works for everyone. Labour can’t do it. Only the Conservatives will.
Donate to our campaign today and together we can build a country that works for everyone.
Thank you for your support,
Conservative Campaign Headquarters