politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » This week’s PB/Polling Matters TV show
As per the new format of the show each guest chooses some polling that they think is interesting and the group discuss what it means. Topics discussed this week include:
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Most Remainers I come across are vacuous millennials who think a 2:2 from a former polytechnic somehow imbues their incoherent ramblings and half-grasped 2nd hand opinions with intellectual rigour.
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
It is a silly argument, you can argue that old people's votes should count more as they've contributed a working lifetime to the Exchequer.
But the flip side that the youth are more important than the oldies is as daft as Andrea Leadsom's argument that she'd be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, because she had children and Mrs May doesn't.
By the Leadsom argument, Mick Philpott is the most eminently qualified person in the country to be Prime Minister.
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Most Remainers I come across are vacuous millennials who think a 2:2 from a former polytechnic somehow imbues their incoherent ramblings and half-grasped 2nd hand opinions with intellectual rigour.
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Most Remainers I come across are vacuous millennials who think a 2:2 from a former polytechnic somehow imbues their incoherent ramblings and half-grasped 2nd hand opinions with intellectual rigour.
Errr, John, we don't need to hear about your encounters with ladies of the night.
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Most Remainers I come across are vacuous millennials who think a 2:2 from a former polytechnic somehow imbues their incoherent ramblings and half-grasped 2nd hand opinions with intellectual rigour.
Very naughty, Mr. M, but there is a lot of truth in that.
On a side note thanks for that book recommendation earlier on today. I bought it and read a couple of chapters whilst waiting for Herself to dish up supper. The question I have is why did they stop actually teaching that stuff at school?
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
It is a silly argument, you can argue that old people's votes should count more as they've contributed a working lifetime to the Exchequer.
But the flip side that the youth are more important than the oldies is as daft as Andrea Leadsom's argument that she'd be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, because she had children and Mrs May doesn't.
By the Leadsom argument, Mick Philpott is the most eminently qualified person in the country to be Prime Minister.
There's an error in your logic, I'm afraid, Mr. Eagles.
(Any better than none) does not imply (many better than few).
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
It is a silly argument, you can argue that old people's votes should count more as they've contributed a working lifetime to the Exchequer.
But the flip side that the youth are more important than the oldies is as daft as Andrea Leadsom's argument that she'd be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, because she had children and Mrs May doesn't.
By the Leadsom argument, Mick Philpott is the most eminently qualified person in the country to be Prime Minister.
BTW, did you see Lord Desai tabled a bill which would enable your benign (ahem) dictatorship by removing Parliamentary term limits?|
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
It is a silly argument, you can argue that old people's votes should count more as they've contributed a working lifetime to the Exchequer.
But the flip side that the youth are more important than the oldies is as daft as Andrea Leadsom's argument that she'd be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, because she had children and Mrs May doesn't.
By the Leadsom argument, Mick Philpott is the most eminently qualified person in the country to be Prime Minister.
BTW, did you see Lord Desai tabled a bill which would enable your benign (ahem) dictatorship by removing Parliamentary term limits?|
I did, it got me all excited at midnight, thinking I'd have to do a thread on the end of the Fixed Term Parliament Act
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
It is a silly argument, you can argue that old people's votes should count more as they've contributed a working lifetime to the Exchequer.
But the flip side that the youth are more important than the oldies is as daft as Andrea Leadsom's argument that she'd be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, because she had children and Mrs May doesn't.
By the Leadsom argument, Mick Philpott is the most eminently qualified person in the country to be Prime Minister.
There's an error in your logic, I'm afraid, Mr. Eagles.
(Any better than none) does not imply (many better than few).
I'm knackered. I've been at Old Trafford, though it sounded like I was in Karachi, my hearing has gone, brain hurts.
And I'm saying the logic fail was all Mrs Leadsom's.
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
It is a silly argument, you can argue that old people's votes should count more as they've contributed a working lifetime to the Exchequer.
But the flip side that the youth are more important than the oldies is as daft as Andrea Leadsom's argument that she'd be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, because she had children and Mrs May doesn't.
By the Leadsom argument, Mick Philpott is the most eminently qualified person in the country to be Prime Minister.
BTW, did you see Lord Desai tabled a bill which would enable your benign (ahem) dictatorship by removing Parliamentary term limits?|
I did, it got me all excited at midnight, thinking I'd have to do a thread on the end of the Fixed Term Parliament Act
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Most Remainers I come across are vacuous millennials who think a 2:2 from a former polytechnic somehow imbues their incoherent ramblings and half-grasped 2nd hand opinions with intellectual rigour.
Very naughty, Mr. M, but there is a lot of truth in that.
On a side note thanks for that book recommendation earlier on today. I bought it and read a couple of chapters whilst waiting for Herself to dish up supper. The question I have is why did they stop actually teaching that stuff at school?
I think it must be linked to the brutalist school of architecture. Function over beauty. We seem to have lost faith in the need to write beautifully and lucidly. One of my great pleasures when reading PB is the eloquence with which many posters express themselves. Long may it continue.
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
It is a silly argument, you can argue that old people's votes should count more as they've contributed a working lifetime to the Exchequer.
But the flip side that the youth are more important than the oldies is as daft as Andrea Leadsom's argument that she'd be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, because she had children and Mrs May doesn't.
By the Leadsom argument, Mick Philpott is the most eminently qualified person in the country to be Prime Minister.
BTW, did you see Lord Desai tabled a bill which would enable your benign (ahem) dictatorship by removing Parliamentary term limits?|
I did, it got me all excited at midnight, thinking I'd have to do a thread on the end of the Fixed Term Parliament Act
I hope you were sitting down!
I was in bed, putting the finishing touches on that Jeremy Corbyn/bumblebee image.
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Most Remainers I come across are vacuous millennials who think a 2:2 from a former polytechnic somehow imbues their incoherent ramblings and half-grasped 2nd hand opinions with intellectual rigour.
Damn, you got me!
I think you are on the side of Angels Rob, never fear .
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Most Remainers I come across are vacuous millennials who think a 2:2 from a former polytechnic somehow imbues their incoherent ramblings and half-grasped 2nd hand opinions with intellectual rigour.
Errr, John, we don't need to hear about your encounters with ladies of the night.
I can assure you that I have never had to deal with ladies of negotiable affection .
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
Isn't the insinuation that old people shouldn't have a say? I've heard that a lot from some Remainers (not on here though). So it isn't totally separate.
Most Remainers I come across are vacuous millennials who think a 2:2 from a former polytechnic somehow imbues their incoherent ramblings and half-grasped 2nd hand opinions with intellectual rigour.
Errr, John, we don't need to hear about your encounters with ladies of the night.
I can assure you that I have never had to deal with ladies of negotiable affection .
Yeah, she was a condom seller, and she was providing you with a demo how to use her product.
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
The fair way is for everyone to be tutored at school.
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
The fair way is for everyone to be tutored at school.
They already are, however extra tuition does not guarantee success, plenty of private schools used to take most of their intake from 11 plus failures with wealthy parents, while some children of bus drivers and binmen made it to grammar school
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
The fair way is for everyone to be tutored at school.
They already are, however extra tuition does not guarantee success, plenty of private schools used to take most of their intake from 11 plus failures with wealthy parents, while some children of bus drivers and binmen made it to grammar school
Our local primary school refuses to teach for the 11 plus because the head doesn't believe in selective education. Sod what the parents think. The sooner academisation is forced upon it the better.
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
The fair way is for everyone to be tutored at school.
They already are, however extra tuition does not guarantee success, plenty of private schools used to take most of their intake from 11 plus failures with wealthy parents, while some children of bus drivers and binmen made it to grammar school
Our local primary school refuses to teach for the 11 plus because the head doesn't believe in selective education. Sod what the parents think. The sooner academisation is forced upon it the better.
Probably thinks Oxbridge is only full of Eton toffs and is totally against such Elitist institutions. I have heard that been uttered in state schools far too often.
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
But if you have a high IQ and practice the test, you can go from 99 percentile to 99.99 percentile.
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
The fair way is for everyone to be tutored at school.
They already are, however extra tuition does not guarantee success, plenty of private schools used to take most of their intake from 11 plus failures with wealthy parents, while some children of bus drivers and binmen made it to grammar school
Our local primary school refuses to teach for the 11 plus because the head doesn't believe in selective education. Sod what the parents think. The sooner academisation is forced upon it the better.
Probably thinks Oxbridge is only full of Eton toffs and is totally against such Elitist institutions. I have heard that been uttered in state schools far too often.
Anyone who sets out to limit the opportunities of the children under their care should be removed from the teaching profession. Simple as that.
@leobarasi straw clutching on the "Labour Brand" Ashcroft polling on the podcast. Putting the straw clutching aside, when did we start believing Ashcroft polling was any good again?
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
But if you have a high IQ and practice the test, you can go from 99 percentile to 99.99 percentile.
You only need to be in the 75-90 percentile to get to a grammar school
The polling on what people want from Brexit...isn't it really just the same from when the public are asked about government priorities, they always want more money for NHS, Schools, Police, Army, but also no real changes to taxes, no cuts elsewhere etc.
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. -plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
The fair way is for everyone to be tutored at school.
They already are, however extra tuition does not guarantee success, plenty of private schools used to take most of their intake from 11 plus failures with wealthy parents, while some children of bus drivers and binmen made it to grammar school
Our local primary school refuses to teach for the 11 plus because the head doesn't believe in selective education. Sod what the parents think. The sooner academisation is forced upon it the better.
Indeed, some get to grammars in spite of, not because of, their primary schools
The polling on what people want from Brexit...isn't it really just the same from when the public are asked about government priorities, they always want more money for NHS, Schools, Police, Army, but also no real changes to taxes, no cuts elsewhere etc.
They want controlled migration and single market membership, so in the end May will have to try and combine the two
They need to grow up. Such petty behaviour only makes them look bad.
Handing out a few EU flags to wave? Does that really count as a protest? There have been EU flags there before and they will be drowned by Union Jacks anyway. Goodnight
They need to grow up. Such petty behaviour only makes them look bad.
Handing out a few EU flags to wave? Does that really count as a protest? There have been EU flags there before and they will be drowned by Union Jacks anyway. Goodnight
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
Whilst waiting for the NBC Forum, I found this news item convincing me that governments need a lost dog or cat policy and a zoo policy for the sentimental reasons of voters (Benji in Yes Minister):
Tutoring was virtually unheard of when I attended grammar school in the early 80s, but times have changed since then. My son started at the same school last year and, although, I didn't hire an external tutor for him, I did spend a lot of time working through practise papers with him myself. He was rather the exception; almost all of his classmates had substantial tuition before taking the 11-plus.
Time to fix the exams so they are unable to be gamed.
Is that possible?
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
If you have a high raw IQ you should pass a proper IQ test with no preparation at all, if you have a low raw IQ even heavy tutoring does not guarantee a pass
The fair way is for everyone to be tutored at school.
They already are, however extra tuition does not guarantee success, plenty of private schools used to take most of their intake from 11 plus failures with wealthy parents, while some children of bus drivers and binmen made it to grammar school
Our local primary school refuses to teach for the 11 plus because the head doesn't believe in selective education. Sod what the parents think. The sooner academisation is forced upon it the better.
Probably thinks Oxbridge is only full of Eton toffs and is totally against such Elitist institutions. I have heard that been uttered in state schools far too often.
Anyone who sets out to limit the opportunities of the children under their care should be removed from the teaching profession. Simple as that.
He's probably doing the kids a favour. Anyone who scrapes into grammar school on the back of extensive tutoring probably isn't going to benefit from grammar school anyway. The parents of one of son's friends decided against sending him to grammar school even though he just about managed a pass, precisely because they thought struggling at school wouldn't do much for his self confidence. He's now doing very well at the excellent local comprehensive and will probably end up with better grades than he would have achieved at grammar school.
I can't think of a worse night to make a protest than Last Night of the Proms with the British flag waving and triumphalist finale to Land of Hope and Glory etc ... the idea anyone at the end of Last Night is going to become pro-Remain when they weren't before is about as likely as John McDonnell being appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer by our new PM.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Very proud of my party and our PM tonight. Grammar schools are what got me an Oxbridge education and the confidence to start my own business, and what got me interested in politics. Perhaps philanthropy could be used to found more/expand existing...
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
If someone identifies 100% with the UK, that's no reason to abolish town councils (or to leave the EU). The principle of subsidiarity requires appropriate tiers for decision making.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
It's quite possible to feel both British and European, depending on the context. In my case, I'm also an Englishman, a Midlander and a Brummie as the situation demands.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
If someone identifies 100% with the UK, that's no reason to abolish town councils (or to leave the EU). The principle of subsidiarity requires appropriate tiers for decision making.
There are times when I wish Sunil was on here 24/7.
LEAVE 52% REMAIN 48%
The people have spoken, they're keen for the central and highest authority to be the parliament that only their own demos votes for.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It was actually used for a short period between 2004-2006.
Pretty sure that ain't the official EU flag!
It was for a short period until the negative reaction forced it to be quietly selved. I remember mocking it back then, when I read "EU flag campaigner" I remembered it again.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
It's quite possible to feel both British and European, depending on the context. In my case, I'm also an Englishman, a Midlander and a Brummie as the situation demands.
Quite. Only one real demos, real political structure in England. The UK.
The people have spoken, they're keen for the central and highest authority to be the parliament that only their own demos votes for.
And Neville Chamberlain was very keen on peace... The modern world for a medium sized power isn't like that and the result of a referendum isn't going to change it, only to diminish our influence on the power structures which affect us.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
It's quite possible to feel both British and European, depending on the context. In my case, I'm also an Englishman, a Midlander and a Brummie as the situation demands.
Quite. Only one real demos, real political structure in England. The UK.
The people have spoken, they're keen for the central and highest authority to be the parliament that only their own demos votes for.
And Neville Chamberlain was very keen on peace... The modern world for a medium sized power isn't like that and the result of a referendum isn't going to change it, only to diminish our influence on the power structures which affect us.
Will you ever accept the idea that you might be wrong about it?
In the words of the good lady. Brexit means Brexit.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
It's quite possible to feel both British and European, depending on the context. In my case, I'm also an Englishman, a Midlander and a Brummie as the situation demands.
Quite. Only one real demos, real political structure in England. The UK.
Erm, I was disagreeing with you.
Yup - but in doing so you identified no definitive political structure. There is no English parliament. No Midland assembly.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
It's quite possible to feel both British and European, depending on the context. In my case, I'm also an Englishman, a Midlander and a Brummie as the situation demands.
Quite. Only one real demos, real political structure in England. The UK.
Erm, I was disagreeing with you.
Yup - but in doing so you identified no definitive political structure. There is no English parliament. No Midland assembly.
"The EU flag campaigner said she did not expect everyone to take one. “We’ll hand out as many as possible, we’ve got thousands. This is not really about the remain, leave debate, it is a celebration of what we’ve got now ... this is what the EU has done for music."
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
It makes sense for political structures to be congruent with people's identities, no? Given that there is a European federation it is natural for people to wish to see their own European nation play a full part in it and not sit on the sidelines.
Ask the public if they associate with UK or EU and it'll be something like 90/10 UK....
It shouldn't be an either/or question.
Why? It makes sense for individuals to have more affinity with one political structure than more than one, no?
It's quite possible to feel both British and European, depending on the context. In my case, I'm also an Englishman, a Midlander and a Brummie as the situation demands.
Quite. Only one real demos, real political structure in England. The UK.
Erm, I was disagreeing with you.
Yup - but in doing so you identified no definitive political structure. There is no English parliament. No Midland assembly.
There is of, course, a Birmingham City Council.
There is - and I guess you could count on the fingers of one hand how many people would be prepared to wave a BCC flag....
Comments
OK 4th like Stein
I mean, I know that SATs are supposed to measure aptitude (as with IQ tests), but there is ample evidence that practice and training has a dramatic effect on results. And, do you really want children to spend 18 months drilling on fairly standardised tests of mental agility?
Why are Leavers so thick? Ah got it, she went to Oxford.
Louise Mensch Confuses Fabric Night Club With Brexit, Gets Comically Torn Apart
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/louise-mensch-brexit-fabric_uk_57cff2f5e4b0d45ff8706b1c?
But the flip side that the youth are more important than the oldies is as daft as Andrea Leadsom's argument that she'd be a better Prime Minister than Theresa May, because she had children and Mrs May doesn't.
By the Leadsom argument, Mick Philpott is the most eminently qualified person in the country to be Prime Minister.
On a side note thanks for that book recommendation earlier on today. I bought it and read a couple of chapters whilst waiting for Herself to dish up supper. The question I have is why did they stop actually teaching that stuff at school?
(Any better than none) does not imply (many better than few).
And I'm saying the logic fail was all Mrs Leadsom's.
Sir Winston Churchill died 51 years ago but an parliament insider said his poo may still be in the sewage system because the pipes are so old.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1744926/politicians-have-to-leave-the-houses-of-parliament-for-five-years-while-10billion-refurb-takes-place/
"But the Philippine leader, who has insulted prominent figures before, is not the only one guilty of offending world leaders.
"From a "sadistic nurse" to "the devil" himself, here are some of the more memorable comments made by or about those in positions of power."
On every occasion I saw a mouse or rat, once millimetres from my food.
To say I went all ponceyboots gaylord would be an understatement.
Dan Hannan
I'm starting to think that we Leavers need an equivalent to @eddieizzard's pink beret. I'm trying out this look... https://t.co/y7grEMsdyE
4-4 fifth set.
Murray fell apart after the PA system made a bleep in the middle of a point in the fourth set when he was coasting along.
https://www.twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/773639726070988802
The Tennis Integrity Unit (TIU) said it was looking into Timea Bacsinszky's win over Vitalia Diatchenko.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/tennis/37302708
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/1745441/leader-of-black-lives-matter-uk-blacked-up-and-pretended-to-be-in-the-minstrels/
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/773532773994725376
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2016/sep/07/pro-eu-protest-planned-for-last-night-of-the-proms
What I find weird is that lots of people don't seem to be able to separate Europe / European countries from the political unions that is the EU.
https://twitter.com/DailyMail/status/773587502024257536
As for Owen Smith, no he doesn't have a single chance.
I can't think of a worse night to make a protest than Last Night of the Proms with the British flag waving and triumphalist finale to Land of Hope and Glory etc ... the idea anyone at the end of Last Night is going to become pro-Remain when they weren't before is about as likely as John McDonnell being appointed Chancellor of the Exchequer by our new PM.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rem_Koolhaas#European_Flag_proposal
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2004/sep/15/2
It was actually used for a short period between 2004-2006.
LEAVE 52%
REMAIN 48%
The people have spoken, they're keen for the central and highest authority to be the parliament that only their own demos votes for.
I remember mocking it back then, when I read "EU flag campaigner" I remembered it again.
In the words of the good lady. Brexit means Brexit.
REMAIN 48%
It's the PB equivalent of yelling MORNINGTON CRESCENT! Game over. No more discussion.
The people have spoken.
Don't you love the smell of democracy in the morning?