Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » And to bring us all down to earth tonight’s Local By-electi

SystemSystem Posts: 11,725
edited July 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » And to bring us all down to earth tonight’s Local By-elections

Mostyn (Lab defence) on Conwy
Result of council at last election (2012): Independents 19, Conservatives 13, Plaid Cymru 12, Labour 10, Liberal Democrats 5 (No Overall Control, Independents short by 11)
Result of ward at last election (2012):

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • Options
    FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,071
    first.
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited July 2016
    Second like Andrea.

    *edit* thanks for adding in the referendum data Harry, that's very interesting.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard
  • Options
    alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.
  • Options
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,222
    edited July 2016
    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard

    Is this not partly an attempt to hold May's feet to the fire?
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,245
    In what universe was that a penalty?
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    edited July 2016
    France battered for 45 minutes and get a penalty in injury time...
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,245
    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    Yes: it's Dan Hannan or Nigel Farage.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,949
    Scott_P said:
    Gove has got to be in the Cabinet I'd have thought...
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,245

    France battered for 45 minutes and get a penalty in injury time...

    A bizarre penalty, tbh. Headed onto his arm; yellow card and penalty.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Amazing .... Leadsom scores for France !!
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    rcs1000 said:

    In what universe was that a penalty?

    Five Live convinced that it was.
  • Options
    alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    WW3 to break out tonight in Marseille?
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,245
    GIN1138 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Gove has got to be in the Cabinet I'd have thought...
    He's in the cabinet as the Lord Chancellor already!
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,245

    rcs1000 said:

    In what universe was that a penalty?

    Five Live convinced that it was.
    BBC! What do they know?
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,221
    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
  • Options
    GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 20,949
    rcs1000 said:

    GIN1138 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Gove has got to be in the Cabinet I'd have thought...
    He's in the cabinet as the Lord Chancellor already!
    The future cabinet. ;)
  • Options
    tlg86 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard

    Is this not partly an attempt to hold May's feet to the fire?
    More likely an attempt to keep Leadsom in the contest, no matter how remote her chances of success.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard

    Shades of Peter Kellner and Andrew Cooper ?
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960
    Handball in the area, stopping a ball going goalwards. Great call ref.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 76,034
    The referee's decision looked all wrong given the flow and so forth of the game but was technically correct. And that's all that matters.

    Great call.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,245
    Yes. Maybe I was hasty in my judgement.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited July 2016
    rcs1000 said:

    France battered for 45 minutes and get a penalty in injury time...

    A bizarre penalty, tbh. Headed onto his arm; yellow card and penalty.
    I thought that FIFA was out of the business stiching matches for the hosts after Blatter resigned.
  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    I think the desired break up of the EU is about getting a better trade deal or even about being able to remake the EU in the UKs image.

  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    There's an argument that the EU is doomed, and if it is it's better that it breaks up sooner rather than later.

    I don't subscribe to the theory but it's a logical argument.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,221
    Surely Cameron should be briefing both May and Leadsom from now on in order to ease the transition for the future PM and party leader?

    Are there civil service rules for this?
  • Options
    MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    Betting Post: Heads up for those betting on the Trump VP pick

    http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2016/07/07/86802266/

    Ivanka!!!???!!

    If I have it right, you can get 66/1 on PaddyPower
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,293
    Trump's also made peace with Ted Cruz and invited him to speak at the convention.
  • Options
    PaulyPauly Posts: 897
    I've decided I want May to win but I want it to be as difficult as possible for her with lots of bloodpact style commitments. This is like the 6th time I've changed my mind so no doubt it'll change again but I really like both candidates.
  • Options
    MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    There's an argument that the EU is doomed, and if it is it's better that it breaks up sooner rather than later.

    I don't subscribe to the theory but it's a logical argument.
    There is also an argument that the EU is doomed and that Europe (as a whole, not just Germany and Northern Europe) will be stronger, more vibrant and stood on a sounder political and economic basis in the new arrangement that comes post-EU. If you take that position, then wishing the EU to fail sooner rather than later could be viewed as tough love rather than hatred.
  • Options
    alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    JonathanD said:

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    I think the desired break up of the EU is about getting a better trade deal or even about being able to remake the EU in the UKs image.

    Whether you believe that or not, it's not an opinion best held in public if you wish to negotiate with the EU.
  • Options
    Paul_BedfordshirePaul_Bedfordshire Posts: 3,632
    edited July 2016

    ToryJim said:
    There are many dedicated and quite fanatical leavers like myself and Max who want to see May win as well.
    Count me in as one of those as well.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    MTimT said:

    Betting Post: Heads up for those betting on the Trump VP pick

    http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2016/07/07/86802266/

    Ivanka!!!???!!

    If I have it right, you can get 66/1 on PaddyPower

    It's illegal to have both the President and the VP from the same state.

    I think it's either Fallin, or Shelley Moore Capito.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,245

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    There's an argument that the EU is doomed, and if it is it's better that it breaks up sooner rather than later.

    I don't subscribe to the theory but it's a logical argument.
    Yeah, but everything is doomed in the long run.

    Basically, if we behave like Dan Hannan, I think we do very well. If we behave like Nigel Farage, then we do not.
  • Options
    shiney2shiney2 Posts: 672
    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..
  • Options

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    There's an argument that the EU is doomed, and if it is it's better that it breaks up sooner rather than later.

    I don't subscribe to the theory but it's a logical argument.
    Wanting it destroyed would be in line with 200 years of UK foreign policy of balance of power aka divide and rule
  • Options
    DanSmithDanSmith Posts: 1,215
    Speedy said:

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard

    Shades of Peter Kellner and Andrew Cooper ?
    Leave.EU's polling was correct on Referendum day...
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,221

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    There's an argument that the EU is doomed, and if it is it's better that it breaks up sooner rather than later.

    I don't subscribe to the theory but it's a logical argument.
    The problem is that it's their business: we want out; it's none of our business what they do next.

    It's also pollutes any exit negotiations with ill-will.
  • Options
    alex.alex. Posts: 4,658
    DanSmith said:

    Speedy said:

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard

    Shades of Peter Kellner and Andrew Cooper ?
    Leave.EU's polling was correct on Referendum day...
    I don't think it's membership polling, it's polling amongst their registered supporters?
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    Trump's also made peace with Ted Cruz and invited him to speak at the convention.

    Now that's important, with the GOP divided Trump is still within stricking distance of Hillary in electoral votes and only about 4-5% behind in the popular vote.

    If the GOP gets united, Trump's chances and numbers will go way way up.
  • Options
    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    I'm a Hannanite. From bad tenant to good neighbour.

    We have a long and proud democratic tradition (this isn't a paean to British exceptionalism, don't worry). That isn't the case in a surprisingly large number of European countries. The EU has mostly helped the PIGS, though in Italy and Greece's case it hasn't been able to stop them self-harming. It's certainly benefited the A8/A2.

    In my lifetime Portugal, Spain and Greece have all been under dictatorships or juntas. People tend to forget that.
  • Options
    John_N4John_N4 Posts: 553
    edited July 2016
    MTimT said:

    I am in no way a Trump apologist, but that star thing has been way overdone and Trump has been stupid to be still responding to it. Solid 6-pointed stars are used in a lot of promotional materials and to most people are not a Star of David, which is two superimposed triangles

    Agreed. It mainly gave a few superficial journalists something to talk about for a short while.

    More interesting is Trump's use of Twitter. He has used it very successfully. As a medium for name-calling insults against rivals - in which he specialises - it has been highly effective. If a tweet misses its target, or embarrasses him in some way, never mind - he just cracks on. The medium doesn't encourage long attention spans. And he's only 5% behind in the polls. Shouldn't he be further behind, given that there's not exactly mass dissatisfaction with Barack Obama?

    I got wittily xkcd'ed the last time I mentioned it, but no Democratic US president has taken over from another Democrat in an election since before the civil war.

    "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."




  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,254

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    We may think that Brexit is a British issue but it really isn't. What Britain has done will have an effect on other countries in the EU; indeed, it already is having such an effect The longer there is uncertainty about what sort of Brexit the government will be seeking, the greater the economic risks - not just to us but to other states. Businesses may take a steady "let's wait and see" approach for now but if things are no clearer in six months then they will make decisions. Others are not going to stand still while we faff around and make our minds up. And it is simply naive to think that when we have made our mind up and ask for "X" we are going to get "X".

    I understand the concerns expressed on the previous thread that a monstering by the metropolitan elite may drive Tory voters into the arms of Ms Leadsom. Tactically that may be right. And the protective instinct is a wonderful thing but really this is a bit pathetic. If she can't survive such a monstering by some newspapers or her opponent, how the hell do you think she will survive the monstering she is going to get from 27 other EU states mightily pissed off at having another problem to deal with?

    They will run rings round her. Those other states will do what is necessary to protect their interests and the interests of the EU. They owe us no favours. The job of the PM is to try and get us into a position where their interests and ours coincide or are close enough that we can do a deal that, give or take, suits us both. That is going to take skill and courage and determination and focus and a lot of hard pounding. Not answering questions is not an option. If you think sneering by the BBC is bad, imagine the sort of sneering there will be from other EU states when the UK presents as its PM the office intern.

    Deciding not to be in the EU is a grown up decision, whether one agrees with it or not. What we need now is to have a grown up to deal with it.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    taffys said:

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.

    No

    Leave made the status of citizens an issue, that May now has to clean up.
  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    " The Vote Leave campaign took great care to lay out an inclusive and compassionate manifesto. "

    lol, Fraser Nelson deluded as always.

  • Options
    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    In my experience it's probably best not to adopt a policy of repatriation if you want to unite the nation post-referendum...smacks a bit too much of Idi Amin
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,105
    Nice touch on the Remain details - I assume that will be kept up for years to come? ;)

    That looks like very low vote numbres in the Conwy election last time. But still better than Eden and the unopposed.

    Have a by-election coming up in my neck of the woods next week - I forewarn there will be several paragraphs of local detail no one will possibly care about coming.
  • Options
    grabcocquegrabcocque Posts: 4,234
    The backbenches? If rumours are to be believed about her relationship with Gove, I'm sure she'd send him to the bottom of a deep ocean trench or the furthest reaches of space if she could.
  • Options
    MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    Speedy said:

    MTimT said:

    Betting Post: Heads up for those betting on the Trump VP pick

    http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2016/07/07/86802266/

    Ivanka!!!???!!

    If I have it right, you can get 66/1 on PaddyPower

    It's illegal to have both the President and the VP from the same state.

    I think it's either Fallin, or Shelley Moore Capito.
    Not so, according to politifact:

    http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/apr/16/lawrence-odonnell/president-vice-president-same-state-allowed/
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    There's an argument that the EU is doomed, and if it is it's better that it breaks up sooner rather than later.

    I don't subscribe to the theory but it's a logical argument.
    Wanting it destroyed would be in line with 200 years of UK foreign policy of balance of power aka divide and rule
    I’m sorry but that’s just silly – the UK will leave the EU, we wish them well and for all those members that chose to remain with it. - It just wasn’t for us, that’s all.

  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    JonathanD said:

    lol, Fraser Nelson deluded as always.

    Fraser is another who campaigned for Out, and is now whining about the consequences

    If only there was a word for that...
  • Options
    O/T

    On the GOP VP stakes, Rod's pick, Martha McSally is 100 to back with Betfair for small stakes and appears to have stalled.
  • Options
    ThreeQuidderThreeQuidder Posts: 6,133
    Speedy said:

    MTimT said:

    Betting Post: Heads up for those betting on the Trump VP pick

    http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/2016/07/07/86802266/

    Ivanka!!!???!!

    If I have it right, you can get 66/1 on PaddyPower

    It's illegal to have both the President and the VP from the same state.
    Not true.

    Electoral College electors can't vote for both a president and VP from their own state - but NY is unlikely to return Republican electors so this doesn't matter.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    alex. said:

    DanSmith said:

    Speedy said:

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard

    Shades of Peter Kellner and Andrew Cooper ?
    Leave.EU's polling was correct on Referendum day...
    I don't think it's membership polling, it's polling amongst their registered supporters?
    They say they have 30,000 con members among their supporters.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    John_N4 said:

    MTimT said:

    I am in no way a Trump apologist, but that star thing has been way overdone and Trump has been stupid to be still responding to it. Solid 6-pointed stars are used in a lot of promotional materials and to most people are not a Star of David, which is two superimposed triangles

    Agreed. It mainly gave a few superficial journalists something to talk about for a short while.

    More interesting is Trump's use of Twitter. He has used it very successfully. As a medium for name-calling insults against rivals - in which he specialises - it has been highly effective. If a tweet misses its target, or embarrasses him in some way, never mind - he just cracks on. The medium doesn't encourage long attention spans. And he's only 5% behind in the polls. Shouldn't he be further behind, given that there's not exactly mass dissatisfaction with Barack Obama?

    I got wittily xkcd'ed the last time I mentioned it, but no Democratic US president has taken over from another Democrat in an election since before the civil war.

    "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public."




    Trump is using Twitter like a boomlet, just like other Twitter users, like they are talking to each other, or a bit like the comments section in any website.

    I see Twitter more like a modern telegraph service.

    Obviously Trump's approach is the correct one, if you are out for votes and attention through controversy.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,254

    alex. said:

    Just as a matter of interest - does Leadsom take the UKIP/Farage line that the UK leaving is the first and necessary step in the break-up of the EU, or does she take the moderate line that Brexit is a British issue, and we (publicly at least) wish the other countries all the best in the future if that is the path they want to take?

    Because I know which line i'd want to be taking if I wanted negotiations with the EU to be conducted in a spirit of mutual beneficial co-operation.

    I don't get the visceral hatred that causes someone who wants the UK out of the EU to also say that (s)he also wants the EU destroyed.

    We don't want to be part of the club. Fair enough. It's a very different thing to say you want the club disbanded if the other members are happy enough within it.
    There's an argument that the EU is doomed, and if it is it's better that it breaks up sooner rather than later.

    I don't subscribe to the theory but it's a logical argument.
    Wanting it destroyed would be in line with 200 years of UK foreign policy of balance of power aka divide and rule
    I’m sorry but that’s just silly – the UK will leave the EU, we wish them well and for all those members that chose to remain with it. - It just wasn’t for us, that’s all.

    But we still need a strategy for how we deal with our European neighbours. Just because we're not part of the EU doesn't mean that we can either ignore it or think that its actions won't affect us.

    A European strategy is needed more than ever now. Brexit is merely the very first stage in such a process.

  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,667
    On what kind of leave we propose, surely we just want to be friends with them rather than openly say, fuck you we're going to destabilise you. We just want to trade and be friends, not shackled to a loveless marriage.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @RuthDavidsonMSP: I'll be on @BBCNewsnight tonight & writing in Scottish @Telegraph tomorrow on why I'm supporting @TheresaMay2016 as our next Prime Minister.
  • Options
    Paul_BedfordshirePaul_Bedfordshire Posts: 3,632
    edited July 2016
    taffys said:

    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.

    No it was the EU (Juncker) by getting in a huff and refusing to discuss such matters until article 50 is tabled. May is only asking for a quid pro quo.

    This is realpolitik not SJW gesture politics.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    Interesting that so far the ref has no big effect on voting intentions or by elections. Lib dems doing quite well in by elections against the Tories,
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    A European strategy is needed more than ever now. Brexit is merely the very first stage in such a process.

    Nah not really. We'll soon be signing trade deals with giant blocs exasperated by Europe's socialism and protectionism.

    An anything but bl88dy Europe is the strategy we need.

    And we won;t be on the hook for the astronomical bills the whole rotten project racks up as it attempts to save its zombie banks and companies.


  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    GIN1138 said:

    Scott_P said:
    Gove has got to be in the Cabinet I'd have thought...
    Not if Boris has a vote.
  • Options
    How David Cameron could have avoided all of this
    By Iain Martin
    http://reaction.life/david-cameron-avoided/
  • Options
    MaxPB said:

    On what kind of leave we propose, surely we just want to be friends with them rather than openly say, fuck you we're going to destabilise you. We just want to trade and be friends, not shackled to a loveless marriage.

    We need to make clear with them that we are prepared to decide fuck you we are going to destabilise you if they try and shaft us in the brexit negotiations though
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,293

    taffys said:

    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.

    No it was the EU (Juncker) by getting in a huff and refusing to discuss such matters until article 50 is tabled. May is only asking for a quid pro quo.

    This is realpolitik not SJW gesture politics.
    https://twitter.com/andrealeadsom/status/747346925586784256
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    McLaren said:

    twitter.com/markgatiss/status/751144722874437633

    People now trying to identify who is wearing that tie
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    In my experience it's probably best not to adopt a policy of repatriation if you want to unite the nation post-referendum...smacks a bit too much of Idi Amin
    I have the intense feeling that the status of EU nationals and UK nationals will be used as hostages in any negotiation.

    The UK can blackmail Poland and Romania with their nationals living in the UK, Spain and Italy with the status of the UK expats living in their countries.

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.
  • Options
    MontyMonty Posts: 346

    alex. said:

    DanSmith said:

    Speedy said:

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard

    Shades of Peter Kellner and Andrew Cooper ?
    Leave.EU's polling was correct on Referendum day...
    I don't think it's membership polling, it's polling amongst their registered supporters?
    They say they have 30,000 con members among their supporters.
    Just like the Labour Party then.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Speedy said:

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.

    Spain, Gibraltar
  • Options
    nunu said:

    Interesting that so far the ref has no big effect on voting intentions or by elections. Lib dems doing quite well in by elections against the Tories,

    The polls are not reflecting the Lib Dems improvement in support on the ground - in the local elections they exceeded the poll ratings by some margin
  • Options
    MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034
    Speedy said:

    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    In my experience it's probably best not to adopt a policy of repatriation if you want to unite the nation post-referendum...smacks a bit too much of Idi Amin
    I have the intense feeling that the status of EU nationals and UK nationals will be used as hostages in any negotiation.

    The UK can blackmail Poland and Romania with their nationals living in the UK, Spain and Italy with the status of the UK expats living in their countries.

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.
    My own feeling is that this one is in fact going to be the biggest non-issue in the otherwise fraught negotiations. Both sides' interests are almost identical.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,105

    nunu said:

    Interesting that so far the ref has no big effect on voting intentions or by elections. Lib dems doing quite well in by elections against the Tories,

    The polls are not reflecting the Lib Dems improvement in support on the ground - in the local elections they exceeded the poll ratings by some margin
    Weren't they doing that pre GE, and was one reason many of us expected them to do better?
  • Options
    AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 2,869
    Reminds me of a (reported) quote from someone's child when Mrs Thatcher was replaced - "but how can the Prime Minister be a man?"
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    taffys said:

    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.

    No it was the EU (Juncker) by getting in a huff and refusing to discuss such matters until article 50 is tabled. May is only asking for a quid pro quo.

    This is realpolitik not SJW gesture politics.
    https://twitter.com/andrealeadsom/status/747346925586784256
    That is flat out not going to happen. It would destroy the EU, they cannot agree to it (or at least not framed in those blunt terms). Needs much more fudge.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,105
    MTimT said:

    Speedy said:

    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    In my experience it's probably best not to adopt a policy of repatriation if you want to unite the nation post-referendum...smacks a bit too much of Idi Amin
    I have the intense feeling that the status of EU nationals and UK nationals will be used as hostages in any negotiation.

    The UK can blackmail Poland and Romania with their nationals living in the UK, Spain and Italy with the status of the UK expats living in their countries.

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.
    My own feeling is that this one is in fact going to be the biggest non-issue in the otherwise fraught negotiations. Both sides' interests are almost identical.
    If everyone acts rationally. With elections being held at various places, that's never assured when posturing might look better.
  • Options
    MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    kle4 said:

    Nice touch on the Remain details - I assume that will be kept up for years to come? ;)

    That looks like very low vote numbres in the Conwy election last time. But still better than Eden and the unopposed.

    Have a by-election coming up in my neck of the woods next week - I forewarn there will be several paragraphs of local detail no one will possibly care about coming.

    The referendum figures are for the whole council bot just one ward
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    edited July 2016
    John_M said:

    taffys said:

    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.

    No it was the EU (Juncker) by getting in a huff and refusing to discuss such matters until article 50 is tabled. May is only asking for a quid pro quo.

    This is realpolitik not SJW gesture politics.
    https://twitter.com/andrealeadsom/status/747346925586784256
    That is flat out not going to happen. It would destroy the EU, they cannot agree to it (or at least not framed in those blunt terms). Needs much more fudge.
    They're doing it with Switzerland. They already do it with Liechtenstein. And they know free movement is a political hot potato in the UK.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    John_M said:

    taffys said:

    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.

    No it was the EU (Juncker) by getting in a huff and refusing to discuss such matters until article 50 is tabled. May is only asking for a quid pro quo.

    This is realpolitik not SJW gesture politics.
    https://twitter.com/andrealeadsom/status/747346925586784256
    That is flat out not going to happen. It would destroy the EU, they cannot agree to it (or at least not framed in those blunt terms). Needs much more fudge.
    Cap on low skilled migrants for Britain or end to posted workers directive for UK.
  • Options
    EPGEPG Posts: 6,080
    Speedy said:

    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    In my experience it's probably best not to adopt a policy of repatriation if you want to unite the nation post-referendum...smacks a bit too much of Idi Amin
    I have the intense feeling that the status of EU nationals and UK nationals will be used as hostages in any negotiation.

    The UK can blackmail Poland and Romania with their nationals living in the UK, Spain and Italy with the status of the UK expats living in their countries.

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.
    Erm, of course they're going to issue blanket permission for UK pensioners to stay, so they can charge the UK taxpayer for every prescription and every scan. Or the NHS can bring them home. This is not a point in the UK's favour in negotiations...
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,293
    John_M said:

    taffys said:

    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.

    No it was the EU (Juncker) by getting in a huff and refusing to discuss such matters until article 50 is tabled. May is only asking for a quid pro quo.

    This is realpolitik not SJW gesture politics.
    https://twitter.com/andrealeadsom/status/747346925586784256
    That is flat out not going to happen. It would destroy the EU, they cannot agree to it (or at least not framed in those blunt terms). Needs much more fudge.
    And the fudge on the British side can only be provided by someone who is seen as committed to Brexit. May is not that person.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    Monty said:

    alex. said:

    DanSmith said:

    Speedy said:

    Scott_P said:

    @bbclaurak: Leave.eu releases polling that puts Leadsom ahead of May-given polling probs most interesting thing maybe that leave.eu pushing her so hard

    Shades of Peter Kellner and Andrew Cooper ?
    Leave.EU's polling was correct on Referendum day...
    I don't think it's membership polling, it's polling amongst their registered supporters?
    They say they have 30,000 con members among their supporters.
    Just like the Labour Party then.
    :)

  • Options
    MTimTMTimT Posts: 7,034

    MaxPB said:

    On what kind of leave we propose, surely we just want to be friends with them rather than openly say, fuck you we're going to destabilise you. We just want to trade and be friends, not shackled to a loveless marriage.

    We need to make clear with them that we are prepared to decide fuck you we are going to destabilise you if they try and shaft us in the brexit negotiations though

    If they try to shaft us, we have to be prepared to leave unconditionally and revert to WTO rules, then resume negotiations from that position. Given the trade imbalance, they will want to come to the table soon enough.
  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    EPG said:

    Speedy said:

    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    In my experience it's probably best not to adopt a policy of repatriation if you want to unite the nation post-referendum...smacks a bit too much of Idi Amin
    I have the intense feeling that the status of EU nationals and UK nationals will be used as hostages in any negotiation.

    The UK can blackmail Poland and Romania with their nationals living in the UK, Spain and Italy with the status of the UK expats living in their countries.

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.
    Erm, of course they're going to issue blanket permission for UK pensioners to stay, so they can charge the UK taxpayer for every prescription and every scan. Or the NHS can bring them home. This is not a point in the UK's favour in negotiations...
    Yes, the negotiation about UK and EU nationals living abroad won't be about whether or not to deport them, it will be about what benefits they are entitled to and who pays.

  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960
    Scott_P said:

    Speedy said:

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.

    Spain, Gibraltar
    I think you really overrestimate how much Spain really care about Gib.

    They care about jobs and an economy more than a little bit of land that we've owned for centuries.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,105
    John_M said:

    taffys said:

    Yes, safe pair of hands - especcially for uk citizens living in the EU. Makes me wonder how right wing Leadsome actually is.

    As I remember it was May and not Leadsom that made the UK's EU citizens a bargaining chip.

    No it was the EU (Juncker) by getting in a huff and refusing to discuss such matters until article 50 is tabled. May is only asking for a quid pro quo.

    This is realpolitik not SJW gesture politics.
    https://twitter.com/andrealeadsom/status/747346925586784256
    That is flat out not going to happen. It would destroy the EU, they cannot agree to it (or at least not framed in those blunt terms). Needs much more fudge.
    While I understand the reason for its use, I feel twitter is not the best place for people to make such pronouncements - no room for fudge or nuance, so all you do is create a bunch of statements for people to hold over your head later.
  • Options
    kle4 said:

    nunu said:

    Interesting that so far the ref has no big effect on voting intentions or by elections. Lib dems doing quite well in by elections against the Tories,

    The polls are not reflecting the Lib Dems improvement in support on the ground - in the local elections they exceeded the poll ratings by some margin
    Weren't they doing that pre GE, and was one reason many of us expected them to do better?
    No not really - the GE results were pretty much spot on. Lib Dems were expecting an incumbency effect in existing seats such as in Torbay that would have delivered anoth dozen seats or so but if there was such an effect it was smashed by the hundreds of thousands spent by the Tories.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,293

    MaxPB said:

    On what kind of leave we propose, surely we just want to be friends with them rather than openly say, fuck you we're going to destabilise you. We just want to trade and be friends, not shackled to a loveless marriage.

    We need to make clear with them that we are prepared to decide fuck you we are going to destabilise you if they try and shaft us in the brexit negotiations though
    Then they would have an invitation to interfere in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    edited July 2016
    McLaren said:
    "Wage war on PC". Defo a Ukipper. Must be their wish list of what they want from Andrea.


    *this is blatantly a set up by May supporters no one who is serious says things like " war on pc".
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    McLaren said:

    twitter.com/markgatiss/status/751144722874437633


    That was an amazing scoop. Twitter and smart phones, what a combination!
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Mortimer said:

    I think you really overrestimate how much Spain really care about Gib.

    The day after the vote

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36618796
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    Speedy said:

    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    In my experience it's probably best not to adopt a policy of repatriation if you want to unite the nation post-referendum...smacks a bit too much of Idi Amin
    I have the intense feeling that the status of EU nationals and UK nationals will be used as hostages in any negotiation.

    The UK can blackmail Poland and Romania with their nationals living in the UK, Spain and Italy with the status of the UK expats living in their countries.

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.
    That would be an empty threat. We can't deport 3 million people.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,193
    Oh Gawd, are we going to have to support Portugal in the final?
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960
    Scott_P said:

    Mortimer said:

    I think you really overrestimate how much Spain really care about Gib.

    The day after the vote

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36618796
    You understand the difference between caring and pretending to care, right?
  • Options
    John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited July 2016
    Speedy said:

    shiney2 said:

    First policy initiative of Shariah May unravels..

    "Mrs May’s most senior supporters are worried that this has now become her greatest single liability"

    "BNP policy"

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/07/theresa-may-must-not-be-pm-until-she-rejects-the-policy-of-the-b/

    Safe pair of hands?

    No hiding place for the next 60days..

    In my experience it's probably best not to adopt a policy of repatriation if you want to unite the nation post-referendum...smacks a bit too much of Idi Amin
    I have the intense feeling that the status of EU nationals and UK nationals will be used as hostages in any negotiation.

    The UK can blackmail Poland and Romania with their nationals living in the UK, Spain and Italy with the status of the UK expats living in their countries.

    The UK has the upper hand on this, since expats are mostly retirees spending their pensions in crisis stricken countries who desperately need cash, those countries can't really afford giving the boot to them.
    It's at times like this that I realise the world has, in fact, gone mad.

    We have been told repeatedly that our immigrants are an economic necessity, both in the private sector and public services such as the NHS. We will not get the best from those people, nor will we win any friends by talking in these terms.

    May's holding statement is adequate, but I do think it a tactical mistake to adopt this line in the first place.

    One of the first rules of negotiation is not to underestimate your opposite numbers. Everyone knows that the UK has more EU citizens resident here than there are British citizens in the EU. It's a tacit threat in and of itself. Talking about it in public is a colossal faux pas.

    If people are honest with themselves (an increasingly forlorn hope), had (say) Leave.EU talked about potential deportations during the referendum campaign, people would have been all over it as racism of the worst kind.

    I appreciate that we will not agree on this topic, so I'll leave it there.
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,960

    Oh Gawd, are we going to have to support Portugal in the final?

    Nah - we an all support France safe the knowledge that TSE is a Francophile.
This discussion has been closed.