Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » An SDP Mark 2 is now a real possibility within 4 months

SystemSystem Posts: 11,694
edited June 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » An SDP Mark 2 is now a real possibility within 4 months

To have publicly lost the confidence of three-quarters of your MPs would normally be regarded as a resigning matter. In 1995, John Major set himself the private target in his party’s leadership election of 65% of his MPs, aware that without a substantial lead his authority would be terminally damaged.

Read the full story here


«13456711

Comments

  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    4th like sdpv2
  • Options
    4th is the new 1st
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985
    Second chance at a first and still fluffed it. :(
  • Options
    asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276
    What happened to the other thread?
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Second new thread of the day.

    OT (already) the American conventions start next month so keep an eye on the VP nominees markets.

    Republicans 18 to 21 July
    Democrats 25 to 28 July
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985

    What happened to the other thread?

    I don't have to remind you what the first rule about "the other thread" is.... ;)
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,151
    edited June 2016
    If the left were thinking this thing through they'd do:
    * Corbyn quits and endorses McDonnell (*)
    * McDonnell runs and wins
    * McDonnell proposes a fairly centrist manifesto for the next election, since they won't have any money anyhow and everyone will be busy arguing about Brexit
    * Right gradually crumbles away instead of defecting, left consolidates grip on NEC and constituency parties
    * McDonnell does left-wing things

    (*) Or some other left-winger, somebody young and feisty would be better but I can't think of anyone specific.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941

    If the left were thinking this thing through they'd do:
    * Corbyn quits and endorses McDonnell (*)
    * McDonnell runs and wins
    * McDonnell proposes a fairly centrist manifesto for the next election, since they won't have any money anyhow and everyone will be busy arguing about Brexit
    * Right gradually crumbles away instead of defecting, left consolidates grip on NEC and constituency parties
    * McDonnell does left-wing things

    (*) Or some other left-winger, somebody young and feisty would be better but I can't think of anyone specific.

    This is the thing. Another candidate from the left would probably win a leadership election and MPs would rally around him/her (though I doubt that McDonnell would get the nominations necessary to be that candidate). It is Corbyn personally who is the problem here. It is his complete lack of charisma, leadership ability and intellectual flexibility that MPs and others are rebelling against.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024

    4th is the new 1st

    I think that is what Labour were thinking when they elected Corbyn as leader.
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,654
    edited June 2016
    I thnk he should get a row of Corbynista Gonks for his Shadow Cabinet.

    Or Owls, because owls come in Parliaments, and Labour has a tradition of Owls.

    image
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    edited June 2016
    I noticed FPT that c225k Corbyn supporters have already petitioned to support him staying on.

    That's an extraordinary tally - does anyone remember how many new £3 members signed up this time last year?

    IIRC the deadline was during early August 2015, so they're still eligible to vote for him again if they choose to. Jezza has also announced that the scheme will be open again. Does he have this power/can engineer it via the NEC?

    I never thought it was possible to top him winning last year - but if he does it again - as a squatter, just wowzer.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    FART - Falconer Active Resignation Timetable

    0635 hours - Seen entering North Korean Consulate in Broxtowe ....
  • Options
    asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276

    A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Labour members got to choose who they wanted to be in charge 9 months ago. It was JC.

    Everyone isn't accepting the result and rallying around the new leader
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    edited June 2016

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
  • Options
    MattWMattW Posts: 18,654
    edited June 2016
    PlatoSaid said:

    I noticed FPT that c225k Corbyn supporters have already petitioned to support him staying on.

    That's an extraordinary tally - does anyone remember how many new £3 members signed up this time last year?

    IIRC the deadline was during early August 2015, so they're still eligible to vote for him again if they choose to. Jezza has also announced that the scheme will be open again. Does he have this power/can engineer it via the NEC?

    I never thought it was possible to top him winning last year - but if he does it again - as a squatter, just wowzer.

    There's no guarantee that they are anything to do with Labour, or are in the UK. Many may be teenybopppers.

    The petition is hosted by 38degrees.org - left-liberal troll central and essential a Child of Greenpeace - and they have a mailing list of about 3 million whom they mail-shot to sign petitions.
  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,796

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?

    It depends on the timeframe to the election. They will be eventually, but if the election comes in October there will not be time to do it. If it does not happen until 2020 they will have had time to begin building the new party's brand. It'll be an interesting one for Boris to grapple with, but either way he knows that Corbyn will deliver him a huge victory.

  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited June 2016

    A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Labour members got to choose who they wanted to be in charge 9 months ago. It was JC.

    Everyone isn't accepting the result and rallying around the new leader
    You might have noticed, accepting results isnt a big thing on the left, crying on social media and throwing toys around much more so. See GE2015, BrExit Ref etc. Democratic mandates only count if they are for right-on causes, the proles can get stuffed. I noted with interests a whole pile of FB comments from metro lefties about how they had 'lost their country' because a load of 'chavs' came out to vote, very tolerant I am sure.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941

    A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Labour members got to choose who they wanted to be in charge 9 months ago. It was JC.

    Everyone isn't accepting the result and rallying around the new leader

    He has shown himself to be incapable of leading. The dozens of shadow ministers who tried to make it work have discovered that it doesn't.
  • Options
    philiphphiliph Posts: 4,704
    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    I am amazed as each day passes, its almost unbelievable that these events are actually happening.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    Omnium said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

    A split only works if the right has big donors lined up; without cash to fight an election, they are scuppered (maybe Tony Blair can put his hand in his pocket). Perhaps they have, and this is a carefully-plotted coup, though Angela Eagle as putative LOTO suggests otherwise.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941

    Omnium said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

    A split only works if the right has big donors lined up; without cash to fight an election, they are scuppered (maybe Tony Blair can put his hand in his pocket). Perhaps they have, and this is a carefully-plotted coup, though Angela Eagle as putative LOTO suggests otherwise.

    It clearly was not plotted This has all come from the Hillary Benn sacking. Now it has happened, though, things will be happening behind the scenes.

  • Options
    OmniumOmnium Posts: 9,796

    Omnium said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

    A split only works if the right has big donors lined up; without cash to fight an election, they are scuppered (maybe Tony Blair can put his hand in his pocket). Perhaps they have, and this is a carefully-plotted coup, though Angela Eagle as putative LOTO suggests otherwise.
    Good point. I think they can probably raise some funds though.

    Labour as it stands must face going bust I guess too.
  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    The big unions still support Corbyn I understand. Many of those MPs are sponsored by those unions yet now appear to have gone opposite to what the unions are saying in public. Something doesn't add up or you are correct a lot of funding withdrawals followed by deselection is about to occur. That would result in new faces all around and these replacements would have little or no experience but only be expected to be loyal to the Corbyn leadership. Not really an effective opposition then in such times.
  • Options
    eekeek Posts: 25,008

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High but it's a timing issue. Early election and you can't do anything, no election and the local momentum members have plenty of time to deselect their mp.

    To be honest I actually don't know if the name (as that is really what is being fought over) is worth the pain. After last Thursday I don't think the word labour has the 10-20,000 benefit it had before.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,927
    Endless amusement. Except that there's a lot going on in government right now, there will be a new PM soon and the EU exit is going to take up most of the time for the next couple of years.

    Governments (of any colour) should be challenged on their decisions and held to account for their actions. An Opposition that is constantly fighting among themselves is not worthy of that name. Hopefully the SDP2 can quickly form and take up the official Opposition role with the support of most constituencies and their resources.

    The worst case scenario of course, is that half way through the chaos the govt calls a general election to get a more workable majority.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.

  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    OK fuck labour they are indeed finished, here's what the next Tory leader should seek to do:


    During the leadership race the challengers should explain their visions on two things:-
    1) How they will heal the divide exposed by the referendum. The white vs.non white divide, the extremism divide (Islamic and far right), the generation divide; future cuts should happen slower than planned now and more evenly, the class divide- how to make sure social mobility returns to Britain and people from working class backgrounds have similar opportunities as their wealthier counterparts, this is not a redistribution of income rather a redistribution of chances. The divide between the nations need to be healed to save the union by devolving power that is returning to Westminster to the the nations and London, get on with devolution to the big city REGIONS of England, the divide between the capital and the English provinces needs to be healed by rebalancing the economy from financial services to manufacturing -easier said than done but must happen.


    2) We need to make sure Britain has the most competitive economy in Europe:
    Lower corporation tax by closing tax loopholes, maybe lower corporation taxes for manufacturing firms, an immigration system that makes fucking sense but doesn't drive down wages, less regulation (might not be possible depending on what trade deal we have with Europe), trade deals with our interests at heart.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Omnium said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

    A split only works if the right has big donors lined up; without cash to fight an election, they are scuppered (maybe Tony Blair can put his hand in his pocket). Perhaps they have, and this is a carefully-plotted coup, though Angela Eagle as putative LOTO suggests otherwise.

    It clearly was not plotted This has all come from the Hillary Benn sacking. Now it has happened, though, things will be happening behind the scenes.

    I know HB gave a decent speech a few months ago, and won a few admirers, but he was a complete car crash over the EU Ref and will have proved himself to be anathema to a lot of the Labour core vote with his "immigration is a price worth paying" comments. If he is the big hope, I think they might as well call in the receivers now.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/677406/EU-referendum-debate-Hilary-Benn-Remain-Leave-campaign-Brexit-European-Union
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Moses_ said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    The big unions still support Corbyn I understand. Many of those MPs are sponsored by those unions yet now appear to have gone opposite to what the unions are saying in public. Something doesn't add up or you are correct a lot of funding withdrawals followed by deselection is about to occur. That would result in new faces all around and these replacements would have little or no experience but only be expected to be loyal to the Corbyn leadership. Not really an effective opposition then in such times.

    What will happen is that the Labour vote will split in many constituencies. MPs with a strong local presence may survive that, but most won't. Millions will vote for the two parties, but thanks to FPTP only a handful of MPs - at best - will make it to the Commons. The Tories will get their biggest ever majority at the next GE. That is the betting market we should be looking at now.

  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Indigo said:

    A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Labour members got to choose who they wanted to be in charge 9 months ago. It was JC.

    Everyone isn't accepting the result and rallying around the new leader
    You might have noticed, accepting results isnt a big thing on the left, crying on social media and throwing toys around much more so. See GE2015, BrExit Ref etc. Democratic mandates only count if they are for right-on causes, the proles can get stuffed. I noted with interests a whole pile of FB comments from metro lefties about how they had 'lost their country' because a load of 'chavs' came out to vote, very tolerant I am sure.
    I feel rather sorry for Labour members - they made a choice, the MPs never liked it - and now they're being forced into voting again.

    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Corbyn is pretty useless, but frankly are the alternatives that much better? They've no policy platform at all - no work's been done to set an agenda. They've spent 9 months bickering and bad-mouthing rather than coming up with a credible alternative.

    I can't understand their timing at all.
  • Options
    SandpitSandpit Posts: 49,927

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    Pretty high I'd think. Which is why they need to act now. Find a couple of big donors, take constituency resources with them, group together as SDP2 for front bench seats and Short money etc. If they wait too long they'll be driven out of Corbyn's New Old Labour Party, into oblivion.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    eek said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High but it's a timing issue. Early election and you can't do anything, no election and the local momentum members have plenty of time to deselect their mp.

    To be honest I actually don't know if the name (as that is really what is being fought over) is worth the pain. After last Thursday I don't think the word labour has the 10-20,000 benefit it had before.
    A chap I was talking to yesterday told me he had voted Labour all his life because Labour was the party of the working class. He said he cannot vote for anyone any more.
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    Good article Mr Herdson, thanks - In the time honoured tradition of industrial action, Corbyn has elected to work-to-rule. - It’s Labour’s rule book that has bitten them on the backside.
  • Options
    Indigo said:

    A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Labour members got to choose who they wanted to be in charge 9 months ago. It was JC.

    Everyone isn't accepting the result and rallying around the new leader
    You might have noticed, accepting results isnt a big thing on the left, crying on social media and throwing toys around much more so. See GE2015, BrExit Ref etc. Democratic mandates only count if they are for right-on causes, the proles can get stuffed. I noted with interests a whole pile of FB comments from metro lefties about how they had 'lost their country' because a load of 'chavs' came out to vote, very tolerant I am sure.
    Not big on the right either. Farage told us ahead of time that a 52:48 result the other way would be unfinished business - and you can imagine the noise from the tinfoil hatters about how MI5's rubber-outers stole the election.

    Both sides have lazy, unthinking zealots, who can't be bothered to contemplate why 50% (+/- 2%) of the population disagreed with their infallible conclusion.
  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865

    Omnium said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

    A split only works if the right has big donors lined up; without cash to fight an election, they are scuppered (maybe Tony Blair can put his hand in his pocket). Perhaps they have, and this is a carefully-plotted coup, though Angela Eagle as putative LOTO suggests otherwise.

    It clearly was not plotted This has all come from the Hillary Benn sacking. Now it has happened, though, things will be happening behind the scenes.

    Wasn't Bennexit as a result of plotting?
  • Options
    MortimerMortimer Posts: 13,951
    nunu said:

    OK fuck labour they are indeed finished, here's what the next Tory leader should seek to do:


    During the leadership race the challengers should explain their visions on two things:-
    1) How they will heal the divide exposed by the referendum. The white vs.non white divide, the extremism divide (Islamic and far right), the generation divide; future cuts should happen slower than planned now and more evenly, the class divide- how to make sure social mobility returns to Britain and people from working class backgrounds have similar opportunities as their wealthier counterparts, this is not a redistribution of income rather a redistribution of chances. The divide between the nations need to be healed to save the union by devolving power that is returning to Westminster to the the nations and London, get on with devolution to the big city REGIONS of England, the divide between the capital and the English provinces needs to be healed by rebalancing the economy from financial services to manufacturing -easier said than done but must happen.


    2) We need to make sure Britain has the most competitive economy in Europe:
    Lower corporation tax by closing tax loopholes, maybe lower corporation taxes for manufacturing firms, an immigration system that makes fucking sense but doesn't drive down wages, less regulation (might not be possible depending on what trade deal we have with Europe), trade deals with our interests at heart.

    Couldn't agree more with the first paragraph. But please no more sodding corporation tax cuts. And I say this as a business owner.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Indigo said:

    Omnium said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

    A split only works if the right has big donors lined up; without cash to fight an election, they are scuppered (maybe Tony Blair can put his hand in his pocket). Perhaps they have, and this is a carefully-plotted coup, though Angela Eagle as putative LOTO suggests otherwise.

    It clearly was not plotted This has all come from the Hillary Benn sacking. Now it has happened, though, things will be happening behind the scenes.

    I know HB gave a decent speech a few months ago, and won a few admirers, but he was a complete car crash over the EU Ref and will have proved himself to be anathema to a lot of the Labour core vote with his "immigration is a price worth paying" comments. If he is the big hope, I think they might as well call in the receivers now.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/677406/EU-referendum-debate-Hilary-Benn-Remain-Leave-campaign-Brexit-European-Union

    It's not about Benn personally. It's about the way Corbyn fired him.

  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    edited June 2016

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Omnium said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

    A split only works if the right has big donors lined up; without cash to fight an election, they are scuppered (maybe Tony Blair can put his hand in his pocket). Perhaps they have, and this is a carefully-plotted coup, though Angela Eagle as putative LOTO suggests otherwise.
    Uncle Len is still keen on Jezz, until he changes sides - I can't see much union funding following AltLabour
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.

    None of them will now. Their side won and Cameron is gone. But UKIP is clearly an offshoot of the Conservative party. That's why we had the referendum in the first pace. Cameron was worried that a number of right wing Tory MPs might join it.

  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Indigo said:

    A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Labour members got to choose who they wanted to be in charge 9 months ago. It was JC.

    Everyone isn't accepting the result and rallying around the new leader
    You might have noticed, accepting results isnt a big thing on the left, crying on social media and throwing toys around much more so. See GE2015, BrExit Ref etc. Democratic mandates only count if they are for right-on causes, the proles can get stuffed. I noted with interests a whole pile of FB comments from metro lefties about how they had 'lost their country' because a load of 'chavs' came out to vote, very tolerant I am sure.
    Not big on the right either. Farage told us ahead of time that a 52:48 result the other way would be unfinished business - and you can imagine the noise from the tinfoil hatters about how MI5's rubber-outers stole the election.

    Both sides have lazy, unthinking zealots, who can't be bothered to contemplate why 50% (+/- 2%) of the population disagreed with their infallible conclusion.
    I must have missed all the right-wingers protesting in parliament square when Blair won in 1997/2001/2005, oh wait.. they didn't.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    No - the winner of the leadership contest gets the Labour name. And that will be Corbyn.

  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.
  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865

    Moses_ said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    The big unions still support Corbyn I understand. Many of those MPs are sponsored by those unions yet now appear to have gone opposite to what the unions are saying in public. Something doesn't add up or you are correct a lot of funding withdrawals followed by deselection is about to occur. That would result in new faces all around and these replacements would have little or no experience but only be expected to be loyal to the Corbyn leadership. Not really an effective opposition then in such times.

    What will happen is that the Labour vote will split in many constituencies. MPs with a strong local presence may survive that, but most won't. Millions will vote for the two parties, but thanks to FPTP only a handful of MPs - at best - will make it to the Commons. The Tories will get their biggest ever majority at the next GE. That is the betting market we should be looking at now.

    What if the selection committees are agreeable with their MP though and also think Corbyn is a disaster and don't deselect?
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.

    So that would be the right not accepting the result.

  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    No - the winner of the leadership contest gets the Labour name. And that will be Corbyn.

    Too early to say who will win. The membership is genuinely split.

    Not doing the SDP thing is ingrained in the Labour right and centre DNA. So if Corbyn does win, I doubt it will split. Whereas Corbyn and co, who do not carry SDP baggage, could easily walk. Complex.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.

    None of them will now. Their side won and Cameron is gone. But UKIP is clearly an offshoot of the Conservative party. That's why we had the referendum in the first pace. Cameron was worried that a number of right wing Tory MPs might join it.

    Its a bit more complicated than that isnt it, the original UKIP might well have been libertarians, but a lot of their newer members of effectively Old Labour. Its not a left-right dynamic its a nationalism/patriotism-internationalism/embarrassment dimension.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited June 2016

    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.

    So that would be the right not accepting the result.

    The "Old Labour" working classes in the North are from the right ? who knew ?
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    No - the winner of the leadership contest gets the Labour name. And that will be Corbyn.

    Too early to say who will win. The membership is genuinely split.

    Not doing the SDP thing is ingrained in the Labour right and centre DNA. So if Corbyn does win, I doubt it will split. Whereas Corbyn and co, who do not carry SDP baggage, could easily walk. Complex.

    It's clear to me that the Corbynistas are a majority in the party. But if by some miracle Corbyn was defeated - and I would make the odds something like 250/I - they won't walk. The Labour party remains the far left's only chance of ever having a presence in the mainstream political landscape.

  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    edited June 2016
    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    More likely a new swanky name such as "NEW Labour ;)
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    If a new Conservative leader chose to go to the country for a mandate for his or her Brexit plan (officially – unofficially it would be to capitalise on Labour’s travails), the Labour Party would have no option but to muddle on. There would be time neither for deselections nor the setting up of a new party and it’d be a new world after polling day.

    Strikes me as a very good reason as why there won't be an early election. Never interrupt an enemy making a mistake, etc. etc.

  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Indigo said:

    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.

    So that would be the right not accepting the result.

    The "Old Labour" working classes in the North are from the right ? who knew ?

    No, UKIP is on the right.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    If the left were thinking this thing through they'd do:
    * Corbyn quits and endorses McDonnell (*)
    * McDonnell runs and wins
    * McDonnell proposes a fairly centrist manifesto for the next election, since they won't have any money anyhow and everyone will be busy arguing about Brexit
    * Right gradually crumbles away instead of defecting, left consolidates grip on NEC and constituency parties
    * McDonnell does left-wing things

    (*) Or some other left-winger, somebody young and feisty would be better but I can't think of anyone specific.

    Andy Burnham?
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Good article Mr Herdson, thanks - In the time honoured tradition of industrial action, Corbyn has elected to work-to-rule. - It’s Labour’s rule book that has bitten them on the backside.

    Great observation :smiley:
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.

    None of them will now. Their side won and Cameron is gone. But UKIP is clearly an offshoot of the Conservative party. That's why we had the referendum in the first pace. Cameron was worried that a number of right wing Tory MPs might join it.

    Its a bit more complicated than that isnt it, the original UKIP might well have been libertarians, but a lot of their newer members of effectively Old Labour. Its not a left-right dynamic its a nationalism/patriotism-internationalism/embarrassment dimension.

    I see no evidence whatsoever that UKIP has moved away fro the right. Can you point to a single one of its prominent figures who comes from the left?

  • Options
    dugarbandierdugarbandier Posts: 2,596

    Indigo said:

    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.

    So that would be the right not accepting the result.

    The "Old Labour" working classes in the North are from the right ? who knew ?

    No, UKIP is on the right.
    Carswell aside, now that the europe issue is done, is there any policy difference between UKIP and the BNP (when they had policies)?
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    No - the winner of the leadership contest gets the Labour name. And that will be Corbyn.

    Too early to say who will win. The membership is genuinely split.

    Not doing the SDP thing is ingrained in the Labour right and centre DNA. So if Corbyn does win, I doubt it will split. Whereas Corbyn and co, who do not carry SDP baggage, could easily walk. Complex.

    It's clear to me that the Corbynistas are a majority in the party. But if by some miracle Corbyn was defeated - and I would make the odds something like 250/I - they won't walk. The Labour party remains the far left's only chance of ever having a presence in the mainstream political landscape.

    Is it? Many on the left seem to be coming round to AV on the basis that a formal coalition agreement between left-Labour and right-Labour will have more left-wing policies than the current broad church party.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966

    Indigo said:

    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.

    So that would be the right not accepting the result.

    The "Old Labour" working classes in the North are from the right ? who knew ?

    No, UKIP is on the right.
    It started there, but within the next year its going to be the party of the working man in the North, it already has a load of WWC members. I would be surprised if its not the Steve Woolfe Left-leaning Patriotic/Nationalist Party quite soon, there is a truck load of votes for the taking in those constituencies.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    Mortimer said:

    nunu said:

    OK fuck labour they are indeed finished, here's what the next Tory leader should seek to do:


    During the leadership race the challengers should explain their visions on two things:-
    1) How they will heal the divide exposed by the referendum. The white vs.non white divide, the extremism divide (Islamic and far right), the generation divide; future cuts should happen slower than planned now and more evenly, the class divide- how to make sure social mobility returns to Britain and people from working class backgrounds have similar opportunities as their wealthier counterparts, this is not a redistribution of income rather a redistribution of chances. The divide between the nations need to be healed to save the union by devolving power that is returning to Westminster to the the nations and London, get on with devolution to the big city REGIONS of England, the divide between the capital and the English provinces needs to be healed by rebalancing the economy from financial services to manufacturing -easier said than done but must happen.


    2) We need to make sure Britain has the most competitive economy in Europe:
    Lower corporation tax by closing tax loopholes, maybe lower corporation taxes for manufacturing firms, an immigration system that makes fucking sense but doesn't drive down wages, less regulation (might not be possible depending on what trade deal we have with Europe), trade deals with our interests at heart.

    Couldn't agree more with the first paragraph. But please no more sodding corporation tax cuts. And I say this as a business owner.
    In the first paragraph I would add the division between the wwc boys and girls in education.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited June 2016

    Indigo said:

    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.

    So that would be the right not accepting the result.

    The "Old Labour" working classes in the North are from the right ? who knew ?

    No, UKIP is on the right.
    Carswell aside, now that the europe issue is done, is there any policy difference between UKIP and the BNP (when they had policies)?
    The BNP didn't have any muslim or other minority candidates, and didn't expel any members for being racists, in fact it was probably a membership requirement.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    No - the winner of the leadership contest gets the Labour name. And that will be Corbyn.

    Too early to say who will win. The membership is genuinely split.

    Not doing the SDP thing is ingrained in the Labour right and centre DNA. So if Corbyn does win, I doubt it will split. Whereas Corbyn and co, who do not carry SDP baggage, could easily walk. Complex.

    It's clear to me that the Corbynistas are a majority in the party. But if by some miracle Corbyn was defeated - and I would make the odds something like 250/I - they won't walk. The Labour party remains the far left's only chance of ever having a presence in the mainstream political landscape.

    It's not clear at all. There are some very gobby supporters out there. But make no mistake, Corbyn's 2015 support is split.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    PlatoSaid said:



    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Labour's Constitution is crystal clear: the leader of the party is the ex officio leader of the PLP
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    PlatoSaid said:

    Indigo said:

    A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Labour members got to choose who they wanted to be in charge 9 months ago. It was JC.

    Everyone isn't accepting the result and rallying around the new leader
    You might have noticed, accepting results isnt a big thing on the left, crying on social media and throwing toys around much more so. See GE2015, BrExit Ref etc. Democratic mandates only count if they are for right-on causes, the proles can get stuffed. I noted with interests a whole pile of FB comments from metro lefties about how they had 'lost their country' because a load of 'chavs' came out to vote, very tolerant I am sure.
    I feel rather sorry for Labour members - they made a choice, the MPs never liked it - and now they're being forced into voting again.

    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Corbyn is pretty useless, but frankly are the alternatives that much better? They've no policy platform at all - no work's been done to set an agenda. They've spent 9 months bickering and bad-mouthing rather than coming up with a credible alternative.

    I can't understand their timing at all.
    The timing makes sense if you assume the new Conservative leader will call an early election.

    I think an election before we've left the EU is a terrible idea, but then I was Leave voter.

  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Indigo said:

    Indigo said:

    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.

    So that would be the right not accepting the result.

    The "Old Labour" working classes in the North are from the right ? who knew ?

    No, UKIP is on the right.
    It started there, but within the next year its going to be the party of the working man in the North, it already has a load of WWC members. I would be surprised if its not the Steve Woolfe Left-leaning Patriotic/Nationalist Party quite soon, there is a truck load of votes for the taking in those constituencies.

    There is a strong right wing tradition in the WWC.

  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    More likely a new swanky name such as "NEW Labour ;)
    FPT I posted this
    Re Corbyn.

    The Labour Party could split and the rebels would need a new name but as pointed out up thread retaining the Labour name due to its "strong branding" would be really important to retain seats.

    They have already had "New Labour" hence the convention is to go one step further so how about.

    "New Improved Labour"
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    No - the winner of the leadership contest gets the Labour name. And that will be Corbyn.

    Too early to say who will win. The membership is genuinely split.

    Not doing the SDP thing is ingrained in the Labour right and centre DNA. So if Corbyn does win, I doubt it will split. Whereas Corbyn and co, who do not carry SDP baggage, could easily walk. Complex.

    It's clear to me that the Corbynistas are a majority in the party. But if by some miracle Corbyn was defeated - and I would make the odds something like 250/I - they won't walk. The Labour party remains the far left's only chance of ever having a presence in the mainstream political landscape.

    It's not clear at all. There are some very gobby supporters out there. But make no mistake, Corbyn's 2015 support is split.

    I hope so. I really do. But I just don't see it.

  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Moses_ said:

    Omnium said:

    Yep, the one thing that can save the Labour party now is an early election, so that the majority of MPs returned to the much smaller group that ends up in the new Commons is made up of those who oppose Corbyn. At that stage, not only will the glorious leader have led Labour to crushing defeat, but he will be faced with five more years of not being able to run an opposition. Even Corbyn may give up at that point and then Labour can begin the slow, painful process of rebuilding.

    The alternative is that the election is not called early and the PLP effectively creates a new party that has the time to build support, develop an organisation and get some money. I suspect it will attract a fair amount of that, especially as it would become the official opposition. However, when the election does come, both official Labour and whatever the new party is called (the Co-operative party?) will be wiped out and millions of voters will have no representation at all.

    Of course, if Corbyn were to stand down, all this could be prevented. A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Obviously, that is not going to happen.

    Labour is finished.

    What are the odds on those MP's not supporting Corbyn being deselected?
    High. Which will force a split before that can happen.

    A split only works if the right has big donors lined up; without cash to fight an election, they are scuppered (maybe Tony Blair can put his hand in his pocket). Perhaps they have, and this is a carefully-plotted coup, though Angela Eagle as putative LOTO suggests otherwise.

    It clearly was not plotted This has all come from the Hillary Benn sacking. Now it has happened, though, things will be happening behind the scenes.

    Wasn't Bennexit as a result of plotting?
    It was. The report I read on Friday was basically:

    - Hodge had the Plot 1 coup planned with her vote of no confidence letter, and she knew about the other mass resignations. Plot 2 leaked out.

    - That forced Benn to tell Jezza he'd no confidence in him/got sacked - Plot Two was kick started.

    Plots 1 & 2 have messed each other up, rather than increased the pressure. Hence why we are where we are.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @Claire_Phipps: The SNP will claim today that it is now the official opposition because more MPs back its leader than Labour's https://t.co/Ne1Pov8H8s

    I am not sure, even if they succeeded, that Corbyn would step down
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Charles said:

    PlatoSaid said:



    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Labour's Constitution is crystal clear: the leader of the party is the ex officio leader of the PLP

    The Labour constitution is not the British constitution.

    But if Corbyn wins again, Labour will undoubtedly split.

  • Options
    The labour 'centrists' would be mad to set up SDP2. The unions wont fund them, their constituents in the north wont vote for them and they will be competing for the same minority of votes as the lib dems.

    The only sensible option for them is to resign the whip en masse and take the libdem whip, making Farron leader of the opposition.

    With most of them there is barely a cigarette paper between them and the libdems anyway and if the libdems had 150+ members they might also attract defections from tory remainer wets which would destablise the government and force an early election in which there was a genuine conservative / liberal choice for the electorate and a plausible scenario of libdems being the biggest party (bit not obviously a majority) as the rest of the electorate splits between tory, rump labour, ukip and snp.

    One of the great problems caused by the rise of the labour party in the early 1900s was that we had a country steeped in liberalism but no hope of power for liberals in the liberal party. As a result many many joined the tories and labour resulting by the 21st century in all three being in reality different shades of liberal.

    This consensus has now been blown apart, labour was a party of mass unskilled labour, brought into existence by industrial technology and now being snuffed out by technology no longer needing mass labour, and it is high time that liberals in all three parties recognise what they are and go home.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Moses_ said:

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    More likely a new swanky name such as "NEW Labour ;)
    FPT I posted this
    Re Corbyn.

    The Labour Party could split and the rebels would need a new name but as pointed out up thread retaining the Labour name due to its "strong branding" would be really important to retain seats.

    They have already had "New Labour" hence the convention is to go one step further so how about.

    "New Improved Labour"

    The Co-operative party could split with Labour and that would become the new party's name. Not sure if that's possible, but it's the obvious choice if it is.

  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    PlatoSaid said:



    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Labour's Constitution is crystal clear: the leader of the party is the ex officio leader of the PLP

    The Labour constitution is not the British constitution.

    But if Corbyn wins again, Labour will undoubtedly split.

    If the PLP chose a "spokesman" in Parliament, I don't think that the Speaker could treat him/her as the Leader of the Opposition when the constitution says that the "leader of the party is ex officio the leader of the parliamentary labour party"
  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    Sky reporting that Sturgeon will meet Junker later this week.
  • Options
    JonathanJonathan Posts: 20,901
    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    PlatoSaid said:



    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Labour's Constitution is crystal clear: the leader of the party is the ex officio leader of the PLP

    The Labour constitution is not the British constitution.

    But if Corbyn wins again, Labour will undoubtedly split.

    If the PLP chose a "spokesman" in Parliament, I don't think that the Speaker could treat him/her as the Leader of the Opposition when the constitution says that the "leader of the party is ex officio the leader of the parliamentary labour party"
    Sturgeon
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @NewsInBrie: Labour Party to seek political asylum in Ecuadorian Embassy.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095

    Moses_ said:

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    More likely a new swanky name such as "NEW Labour ;)
    FPT I posted this
    Re Corbyn.

    The Labour Party could split and the rebels would need a new name but as pointed out up thread retaining the Labour name due to its "strong branding" would be really important to retain seats.

    They have already had "New Labour" hence the convention is to go one step further so how about.

    "New Improved Labour"

    The Co-operative party could split with Labour and that would become the new party's name. Not sure if that's possible, but it's the obvious choice if it is.

    I am not sure the word Co-Op in todays world is a good idea. It summons up the idea of little old ladies with hairnets and fags hanging off their lip whilst collecting their divi stamps.

    Very unappealing ;)
  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    More likely a new swanky name such as "NEW Labour ;)
    Новые лейбористы
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    PlatoSaid said:



    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Labour's Constitution is crystal clear: the leader of the party is the ex officio leader of the PLP

    The Labour constitution is not the British constitution.

    But if Corbyn wins again, Labour will undoubtedly split.

    If the PLP chose a "spokesman" in Parliament, I don't think that the Speaker could treat him/her as the Leader of the Opposition when the constitution says that the "leader of the party is ex officio the leader of the parliamentary labour party"

    The SNP is a precedent and the British constitution is very flexible. More likely, though, is that the rebels would form a new party. If that had more MPs than Labour did then it would become the official opposition.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,029
    edited June 2016
    The Labour Party has split twice and both times it’s been electorally disastrous for both sides.
    The “working man (and woman) in the North" surely want a) decent working conditions and b) decency and stability in public life. It’s the Methodism side of the founding fathers. It’s not unreasonable to look at the country around them and be upset by many of the changes they see.
    What WWC voters have to be careful of is being hoodwinked by a “defensive” ideology, overrideing their need for opportunity, as the working class Protestants in N. Ireland were by the Ulster Unionists.
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024
    Indigo said:

    Indigo said:

    Indigo said:

    philiph said:

    Way back in time, in the early days of the referendum campaign I suggested that post referendum there was a strong possibility that both parties would split.

    What amazes me is how together the Tory party seems. Labour will find healing hard without splitting.

    The Tory party split a while back. It's spin-off is called UKIP. If I recall correctly, many Tory Leavers on here were saying this time last week that they would be voting for it at the next general election.


    Not with Farage as leader they wont, or not in large numbers. Farage is bonkers and dangerous.
    If the government goes for a FoM solution just watch, this was the issues that pulled 15-20% of the electorate off their sofas where they have languished since 1992, if they don't get what they want I expect Nigel's Merry Men to do rather well out of it.

    So that would be the right not accepting the result.

    The "Old Labour" working classes in the North are from the right ? who knew ?

    No, UKIP is on the right.
    Carswell aside, now that the europe issue is done, is there any policy difference between UKIP and the BNP (when they had policies)?
    The BNP didn't have any muslim or other minority candidates, and didn't expel any members for being racists, in fact it was probably a membership requirement.
    I think they were forced into changing that policy by the equalities commission.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,349
    The real problem Labour has is that the right of the party is seriously unhappy with Corbyn's inept and half hearted campaigning for EU membership. They point out, correctly, that if Labour supporters had voted for the EU the campaign would have been won. And they are genuinely and enormously upset about this result.

    But if you take a very strong Labour area like Doncaster with Ed Miliband as the MP you find a 69% leave vote. Traditional Labour voters rebelled against an open door immigration plan which directly and consistently reduced their wages, threatened their employment, resulted in them obtaining poorer working conditions and benefited the class that those Labour MPs either come from or aspire to instead of them.

    This is not just a problem with a leadership challenge to Corbyn. What are the chances of the New Improved Labour party winning Doncaster on an unequivocally pro-EU ticket, possibly committed to never triggering the Article 50 procedure? I think, like their initials, they are NIL.
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941

    Moses_ said:

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    More likely a new swanky name such as "NEW Labour ;)
    FPT I posted this
    Re Corbyn.

    The Labour Party could split and the rebels would need a new name but as pointed out up thread retaining the Labour name due to its "strong branding" would be really important to retain seats.

    They have already had "New Labour" hence the convention is to go one step further so how about.

    "New Improved Labour"

    The Co-operative party could split with Labour and that would become the new party's name. Not sure if that's possible, but it's the obvious choice if it is.

    I am not sure the word Co-Op in todays world is a good idea. It summons up the idea of little old ladies with hairnets and fags hanging off their lip whilst collecting their divi stamps.

    Very unappealing ;)

    But it's recognisable and speaks to Labour's roots as a party. Anything with Labour in it would be tricky.

  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Moses_ said:

    Sky reporting that Sturgeon will meet Junker later this week.

    It's inevitable that this meeting occurs but it's constitutionally outrageous and an affront to international diplomacy.

    Firstly Sturgeon should not be treating with foreign powers

    Secondly a leader of a (nominally) friendly nation* shouldn't be fomenting secession of part of the UK

    (* I know he isn't, but he's at that level)
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,496
    edited June 2016
    They could join Nicola and call the resulting conglomerate the, um, British National Party...
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Jonathan said:

    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    PlatoSaid said:



    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Labour's Constitution is crystal clear: the leader of the party is the ex officio leader of the PLP

    The Labour constitution is not the British constitution.

    But if Corbyn wins again, Labour will undoubtedly split.

    If the PLP chose a "spokesman" in Parliament, I don't think that the Speaker could treat him/her as the Leader of the Opposition when the constitution says that the "leader of the party is ex officio the leader of the parliamentary labour party"
    Sturgeon
    Your point?

    The Labour Party Constitution (clause 7) is absolutely clear. I haven't checked the SNP constitution, but presumably they have no issue with their leader not being an MP and doesn't require that the leader of the party is automatically the leader of the parliamentary party.
  • Options
    wasdwasd Posts: 276
    How does whip withdrawal work re: the local parties? If Corbyn removes the the whip from the rebel PLP do they remain the local parties candidate until they also explicitly deselect them or are they also, implicitly, deselected by that act?

    Is it similar for expulsion?
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941
    DavidL said:

    The real problem Labour has is that the right of the party is seriously unhappy with Corbyn's inept and half hearted campaigning for EU membership. They point out, correctly, that if Labour supporters had voted for the EU the campaign would have been won. And they are genuinely and enormously upset about this result.

    But if you take a very strong Labour area like Doncaster with Ed Miliband as the MP you find a 69% leave vote. Traditional Labour voters rebelled against an open door immigration plan which directly and consistently reduced their wages, threatened their employment, resulted in them obtaining poorer working conditions and benefited the class that those Labour MPs either come from or aspire to instead of them.

    This is not just a problem with a leadership challenge to Corbyn. What are the chances of the New Improved Labour party winning Doncaster on an unequivocally pro-EU ticket, possibly committed to never triggering the Article 50 procedure? I think, like their initials, they are NIL.

    We don't know what the new party's platform would be. We don't know how popular leaving the EU will be when the election is called. We don't know what the themes of the next GE will be. If Boris is PM and has not delivered on his promises, then that may well be the major issue. The voters may be at a point where what they want to do most of all is get rid of the Tories. That's why an early election is probably in Boris's best interests. He should get it out of the way before the scale of his betrayal becomes apparent.

  • Options
    PlatoSaidPlatoSaid Posts: 10,383
    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    Jonathan said:

    A Syriza/Podemos party is more likely than an SDP2. It already has a name. Momentum

    No - the winner of the leadership contest gets the Labour name. And that will be Corbyn.

    Too early to say who will win. The membership is genuinely split.

    Not doing the SDP thing is ingrained in the Labour right and centre DNA. So if Corbyn does win, I doubt it will split. Whereas Corbyn and co, who do not carry SDP baggage, could easily walk. Complex.

    It's clear to me that the Corbynistas are a majority in the party. But if by some miracle Corbyn was defeated - and I would make the odds something like 250/I - they won't walk. The Labour party remains the far left's only chance of ever having a presence in the mainstream political landscape.

    It's not clear at all. There are some very gobby supporters out there. But make no mistake, Corbyn's 2015 support is split.
    Lady on Sky hinted at Times poll tomorrow - 1000 Labour members, rumour 50/50.
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,221
    Good morning all from a brilliantly sunny and hot Amalfi!

    One question: since Dave's renegotiated deal is now dead, doesn't that mean that for the time being the UK continues to have a veto on further integrationist measures by the Eurozone? I seem to recall that giving up that veto was part of the deal.

    If so - and on the assumption that the Eurozone will want to get on with integration (Italian banks have been in trouble for some time as is Germany's main bank) - does that not give the UK some leverage?

    And now to breakfast and deciding what to do this glorious day.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,349
    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    PlatoSaid said:



    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Labour's Constitution is crystal clear: the leader of the party is the ex officio leader of the PLP

    The Labour constitution is not the British constitution.

    But if Corbyn wins again, Labour will undoubtedly split.

    If the PLP chose a "spokesman" in Parliament, I don't think that the Speaker could treat him/her as the Leader of the Opposition when the constitution says that the "leader of the party is ex officio the leader of the parliamentary labour party"
    I would agree until those MPs resign the Labour whip. At that point they are no longer bound by the Labour Party rule book.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    wasd said:

    How does whip withdrawal work re: the local parties? If Corbyn removes the the whip from the rebel PLP do they remain the local parties candidate until they also explicitly deselect them or are they also, implicitly, deselected by that act?

    Is it similar for expulsion?

    If Corbyn wins again, he wants to change the rules so that all MPs face mandatory reselection
  • Options
    SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 38,941

    The Labour Party has split twice and both times it’s been electorally disastrous for both sides.
    The “working man (and woman) in the North" surely want a) decent working conditions and b) decency and stability in public life. It’s the Methodism side of the founding fathers. It’s not unreasonable to look at the country around them and be upset by many of the changes they see.
    What WWC voters have to be careful of is being hoodwinked by a “defensive” ideology, overrideing their need for opportunity, as the working class Protestants in N. Ireland were by the Ulster Unionists.

    Boris will help here. His betrayal of Leave voters is going to be epic and that will make many of them very keen to get rid of them by any means necessary.

  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,151
    edited June 2016

    The labour 'centrists'... will be competing for the same minority of votes as the lib dems.

    The only sensible option for them is to resign the whip en masse and take the libdem whip, making Farron leader of the opposition.

    The LibDem brand is still fairly horrible so it's not clear that either side would be served by keeping it. But I do think both would want to immediately form either a single party or an electoral pact.
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Charles said:

    Charles said:

    PlatoSaid said:



    If they choose him again, what are the MPs going to do? Kiss and make up? Ignore him? Elect their own PLP leader?

    Labour's Constitution is crystal clear: the leader of the party is the ex officio leader of the PLP

    The Labour constitution is not the British constitution.

    But if Corbyn wins again, Labour will undoubtedly split.

    If the PLP chose a "spokesman" in Parliament, I don't think that the Speaker could treat him/her as the Leader of the Opposition when the constitution says that the "leader of the party is ex officio the leader of the parliamentary labour party"

    The SNP is a precedent and the British constitution is very flexible. More likely, though, is that the rebels would form a new party. If that had more MPs than Labour did then it would become the official opposition.
    How do you propose that the Speaker justifies ignoring the following clause of the Labour Party Constitution? [Article 7.1(a)]

    (a) There shall be a leader and deputy leader of the party who shall, ex-officio, be leader and deputy leader of the PLP.

    I agree that if they formally split you would have a new leader and a new LOTO.

    Similarly if enough of them resigned the whip without forming a new party then you'd have an argument that the SNP should become the official opposition.

    But while they are just a rebel faction within the PLP that ignores the authority of their leader then I don't see how the Speaker intervenes.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    A new candidate on the left could stand against candidates from the centre and the right, and Labour members would get to choose who they wanted to be in charge. The very high probability is that everyone would accept the result and rally around the new leader.

    Labour members got to choose who they wanted to be in charge 9 months ago. It was JC.

    Everyone isn't accepting the result and rallying around the new leader

    He has shown himself to be incapable of leading. The dozens of shadow ministers who tried to make it work have discovered that it doesn't.
    The people in the shadow cabinet were willing to make the effort at least. Many simply refused to join, ore were not asked.

    I don't think this revolt is predominantly about Europe. It was going to have to happen this summer to prevent changes to the LP constitution at conference. It was simply nessecary to get the referendum out of the way first.

    Eagle has had some good commons performances. Watson should stick as Deputy, or there is a risk of Corbynistas taking that post too.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Scott_P said:

    wasd said:

    How does whip withdrawal work re: the local parties? If Corbyn removes the the whip from the rebel PLP do they remain the local parties candidate until they also explicitly deselect them or are they also, implicitly, deselected by that act?

    Is it similar for expulsion?

    If Corbyn wins again, he wants to change the rules so that all MPs face mandatory reselection
    He must be an agent provocateur.. He really does want to finish off the Labour Party.
This discussion has been closed.