Anecdote alert - listening to the news right now in a London pub, the comments I've overheard about Cameron are universally mocking. Unless there's a very, very silent majority for Remain then he's in trouble.
But I honestly wonder how many will then vote Remain in spite of mocking Cameron. I think there is a general mocking of ALL politicians with a very few rare exceptions and I am not really sure how much individuals drive the vote in these sort of referendums.
As an example a lot of people who voted for Independence in Scotland were not fans of Salmond.
I think the one big difference between the EU referendum and the Scottish referendum is that there is still some sense of patriotism towards the United Kingdom and its shared history and legacy amongst those who supported remains in the union whereas there is no sense of patriotism towards the EU or any love for it. There is no sense of loyalty towards it from the British people whereas there was a sense of loyalty towards the UK in the Scottish referendum this is why I think this referendum will be not what people expect and I think LEAVE are in with a real chance of getting over the finishing line
I think it is worth pointing out what Merkel actually said.
Something like:
"You will not get what you want from the single market if you are not around the table".
It isn't a threat, promise or anything sinister at all.
The rules of the single market are set by those at the table (mostly) and not those who are not. (mostly).
There was no threat that there would be no access to the single market (or any promise of access to it) if we were to leave.
Sad really that such a statement of the bleeding obvious in such a reasonable manner should be hyped into a threat, to a point by both sides. It simply isn't.
What she actually said, assuming your translation is accurate, fair enough, but why did she feel she needed to say it? Why did the Chancellor of Germany decide to put her oar into a UK debate? There is a question worth thinking about.
Well, one, someone probably asked her. But two, she has an interest, a very substantial interest, in the steps being taken by one of Germany's very largest trading partners. Once again the Indyref comes to mind. The idea that what Scotland decided was none of England's business was always demented because we have a Union. We also have a Union, of sorts, with the rest of the EU.
What is far more disappointing is how little value was put on that Union when Cameron was trying to negotiate a package that he could sell to the British people. That is looking like a serious mistake.
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
For it to operate in that way with any longevity it also needs an outside guarantor of security. It's dangerously complacent to think that the US will play that role in perpetuity, particularly given recent developments.
No, its constituent countries need to maintain armed forces and as they have a common interest they are likely to act together when they feel collectively threatened. NATO fills that role as the US & Canada currently feels they have an interest, but if they no longer play there is nothing stopping us carrying on.
Britain will always be in Europe - but we are certainly not better off overall in the EU - if you look at the slogan you will see that even the name for the Remain Campaign is wrong and misleading.
Even if you believe that you have to add the proviso 'all else being equal', which it won't be forever.
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
Mr. Owls, I don't know about the TV stuff as I never watch the thing, but I disagree that this site has become over confident on Brexit. Those of us who are Leavers may be slightly more hopeful, maybe even optimistic, than we were (and your news has something to do with that, aside from the other events) but far from confident let alone over confident.
The majority of journalists are left-wing and hence pro-Europe - what else do you think they would say????
I think far more votes are still up for grabs (in both directions) than people realise.
Look where the EU comes in the MORI issues index. It's an issue the vast majority of people haven't cared much about and haven't thought much about.
It may be that people are giving a positive - ie Remain or Leave - answer to pollsters. But people don't like saying Don't Know and I suspect even those who think they have decided may change - because views are not embedded in the same way as, for example, Party voting intention.
My Bulgarian wife (she got British nationality in March) has just come into the living room and told me she's made a decision on the referendum.
She's voting Leave.
Golly, what's changed her mind?
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
She has moved from firm Remain, to undecided, to (now) Leave.
She remains pro-European but agreed with me that the EU is just never going to change unless they suffer the shock of losing one of their main members, and we learn to collaborate and cooperate rather than force, threaten and compel against the democratic will of the peoples across Europe.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
No, not really. A lot of common safety standards come from the WTO, by consensus for example.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
Pool old Nigel, he is absolutely right on immigration (tens of thousands pledge, etc), makes ok sensible points. But every word he utters about it toxifies the Leave campaign as being part of the anti-Johnny Foreigner fringe.
I don't get the felling Nigel is THAT toxic for leave, just as Cameron's ratings might be bad in the polls but still comes over well. Polling doesn't always (never?) tells you the whole story.
My Bulgarian wife (she got British nationality in March) has just come into the living room and told me she's made a decision on the referendum.
She's voting Leave.
Golly, what's changed her mind?
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
She has moved from firm Remain, to undecided, to (now) Leave.
She remains pro-European but agreed with me that the EU is just never going to change unless they suffer the shock of losing one of their main members, and we learn to collaborate and cooperate rather than force, threaten and compel against the democratic will of the peoples across Europe.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
But surely a single market requires a legislative body charged with harmonising technical and trading standards between its members. Otherwise it's not a single market, just a trading association.
Most of that work is already done at a level above the Single market.
My Bulgarian wife (she got British nationality in March) has just come into the living room and told me she's made a decision on the referendum.
She's voting Leave.
Golly, what's changed her mind?
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
She has moved from firm Remain, to undecided, to (now) Leave.
She remains pro-European but agreed with me that the EU is just never going to change unless they suffer the shock of losing one of their main members, and we learn to collaborate and cooperate rather than force, threaten and compel against the democratic will of the peoples across Europe.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
But surely a single market requires a legislative body charged with harmonising technical and trading standards between its members. Otherwise it's not a single market, just a trading association.
That comes from the WTO mostly though where they do things by consensus.
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
And you've never been anything but tup-thumping for Remain.
Every intervention and scaremongering report was described as a gamechanger.
It is interesting to see a significant number of "undecideds" come off the fence and fanatically defend the EU.
Although I am one, so I would say that, I think most PB Remainers have not been fanatical. They have assessed the issues and on balance have thought that Remain offers the best, least disruptive, least value destructive, best option possible (rather than best possible option) for their country.
PB Remainers are also devastatingly good looking, suave, amusing, and sophisticated, but I digress.
It's only about your wallet. You can be bought and we know it.
a) you know nothing about me; b) It is about the wallet of the UK; c) every voter can be bought, as we have seen through the ages; although d) apart from you, it seems.
it's only money
we can always print some more
It would be a shame if you (and presumably many like you) were to vote Leave because you thought George was less than perfect.
I'm sure John McDonnell would be less disappointing.
Bizarrely McDonnell actually has some ideas.
George not so much
Oddly enough, Mr. Brooke, I actually read some of the stuff that McDonnell has been coming out with on the economic front and found to my surprise there was a fair amount that I agreed with and a bit more that, whilst I didn't like it, I could live with. If the fellow didn't have such awful baggage he might get more of a hearing - his ideas deserve that at least.
I'd never vote for the bastard, though, or his boss. Their association with, and seeming affection for, murders is not forgivable for me.
Britain will always be in Europe - but we are certainly not better off overall in the EU - if you look at the slogan you will see that even the name for the Remain Campaign is wrong and misleading.
Even if you believe that you have to add the proviso 'all else being equal', which it won't be forever.
The phrase cuts both ways. Except that 'all else being equal' doesn't apply since Europe was in theory (before being derailed on 23rd June) heading for ever closer Union. So things will certainly not be equal.
It is generally accepted by the media that there were no 'knockout blows' tonight and that DC did reasonably well despite the hostility of the audience. Gove tomorrow will be very interesting
How many swing voters will have actually watched Cameron tonight? Cunning move to schedule his appearance when the football was in progress, though I gather that was as good as watching concrete harden.
At least Vardy will come home early and rested. Hodgson has no clue as to formation or tactics and the players looked halfhearted. I expect an early exit, possibly at the group stage - a couple of days before the vote.
How you can read that into tonight's game I have no idea. It was ruined as a contest as soon as the Portuguese got sent off for a remarkably dangerous tackle, leaving the referee no choice.
I watched the other warm ups, and watched the faces of the players on and off the pitch. They looked confused by what they were asked to do. Kane is a great header of the ball, but taking the free kicks for example. Wales should top the group.
I agree about the insanity of Kane taking free kicks. I also think Wales will do well, but I reckon we'll beat them.
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
I doubt if anybody's confident at all. It's rather that, previously, it seemed there was no chance of Leave winning. Now, it doesn't look utterly impossible.
Thursday night on the 23rd will be at least as exciting as Election Night, IMHO.
No. More so, as it will make elections actually mean something.
Monitoring the movement of the pound from mid afternoon could be the key
Britain will always be in Europe - but we are certainly not better off overall in the EU - if you look at the slogan you will see that even the name for the Remain Campaign is wrong and misleading.
I will agree to disagree with you. I'm not looking for an argument - I was just merely illustrating the point that I am a Remainer who believes that Leave will win.
This is a measure of how confident I am about the referendum:
A few days ago I went to the Britain Stronger in Europe online shop to choose a t-shirt. I liked the one with the simple slogan "I'm In" the best... But if we leave the EU then I'd not be able to go on wearing it without looking really daft - as, obviously, I'd not be "in" at that point. So I opted for a "Britian Stronger in Europe" slogan t-shirt instead. It's not as nice as the other one but I can can keep on wearing it even if we leave the EU as the slogan will still be a statement of principle and belief.
Welcome back Steven. Nice to see you contributing again. Obviously I hope Leave win but I will be genuinely sorry for you in that case as I have always admired your commitment to an ideal you believe in.
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
For it to operate in that way with any longevity it also needs an outside guarantor of security. It's dangerously complacent to think that the US will play that role in perpetuity, particularly given recent developments.
No, its constituent countries need to maintain armed forces and as they have a common interest they are likely to act together when they feel collectively threatened. NATO fills that role as the US & Canada currently feels they have an interest, but if they no longer play there is nothing stopping us carrying on.
Sure, there's nothing stopping us carrying on, but when there's no NATO, and Germany's hard power is obliged to match its economic power while there's a Russian menace on the periphery and no political coherence to the unity of the democratic states, I don't think that scenario ends well.
Pre-World War I there was plenty of economic interdependence but it didn't prevent that tragedy from occurring.
I think it is worth pointing out what Merkel actually said.
Something like:
"You will not get what you want from the single market if you are not around the table".
It isn't a threat, promise or anything sinister at all.
The rules of the single market are set by those at the table (mostly) and not those who are not. (mostly).
There was no threat that there would be no access to the single market (or any promise of access to it) if we were to leave.
Sad really that such a statement of the bleeding obvious in such a reasonable manner should be hyped into a threat, to a point by both sides. It simply isn't.
What she actually said, assuming your translation is accurate, fair enough, but why did she feel she needed to say it? Why did the Chancellor of Germany decide to put her oar into a UK debate? There is a question worth thinking about.
I think someone asked her a question and she answered it.
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
I doubt if anybody's confident at all. It's rather that, previously, it seemed there was no chance of Leave winning. Now, it doesn't look utterly impossible.
Thursday night on the 23rd will be at least as exciting as Election Night, IMHO.
No. More so, as it will make elections actually mean something.
It will probably be more exciting simply because a Leave vote spells unfixable disaster. But the referendum should not be happening.
I quite like Liz Truss - but someone ought to tell her that her holding thumb and fore finger together when making every point is far too distracting for a TV appearance.
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
I doubt if anybody's confident at all. It's rather that, previously, it seemed there was no chance of Leave winning. Now, it doesn't look utterly impossible.
Thursday night on the 23rd will be at least as exciting as Election Night, IMHO.
No. More so, as it will make elections actually mean something.
It will probably be more exciting simply because a Leave vote spells unfixable disaster. But the referendum should not be happening.
I quite like Liz Truss - but someone ought to tell her that her holding thumb and fore finger together when making every point is far too distracting for a TV appearance.
Just as long as she doesn't start ranting about cheese...
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
There are also examples where the EU has produced standards which are downright dangerous. An example I have discussed in the past with Mr Twisted on here is fire extinguishers where the EU standard now makes it far more difficult to tell from a distance what type of fire extinguisher is hanging on a wall. The rest of the world has a much better system.
I quite like Liz Truss - but someone ought to tell her that her holding thumb and fore finger together when making every point is far too distracting for a TV appearance.
Just as long as she doesn't start ranting about cheese...
Welcome back Steven. Nice to see you contributing again. Obviously I hope Leave win but I will be genuinely sorry for you in that case as I have always admired your commitment to an ideal you believe in.
Good evening, Richard. I hope you're well - it's nice to interact with you again. It's good to be back here - the break I took was, I think, much needed though.
Does anyone have a prediction for the day that the exchanges magically make LEAVE the favourite. I remember seeing Corbo's odds tumbling in one afternoon/evening last year and cashing out too soon....
That is hard - but the people betting on leave are those generally with not too much money, having had their wages squeezed by excessive EU (and non EU) immigration.
It still seems incredible that the odds are 11/4 against - when the online polls aren't picking up the C2DEs who have no computers or use them for other things - and who may not now have landlines just PAYG mobiles and so are slipping through the phone pollers.
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
She has moved from firm Remain, to undecided, to (now) Leave.
She remains pro-European but agreed with me that the EU is just never going to change unless they suffer the shock of losing one of their main members, and we learn to collaborate and cooperate rather than force, threaten and compel against the democratic will of the peoples across Europe.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
But surely a single market requires a legislative body charged with harmonising technical and trading standards between its members. Otherwise it's not a single market, just a trading association.
That comes from the WTO mostly though where they do things by consensus.
Not sure what happened there, but I already replied to this below. See my example concerning the colour coding of gas bottles: defined by legislation in the EU, varies around the rest of the world. These are the sort of technical standards that make it easier to trade within the EU.
My Bulgarian wife (she got British nationality in March) has just come into the living room and told me she's made a decision on the referendum.
She's voting Leave.
Golly, what's changed her mind?
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
She has moved from firm Remain, to undecided, to (now) Leave.
She remains pro-European but agreed with me that the EU is just never going to change unless they suffer the shock of losing one of their main members, and we learn to collaborate and cooperate rather than force, threaten and compel against the democratic will of the peoples across Europe.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
No, not really. A lot of common safety standards come from the WTO, by consensus for example.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
Yeah ....they standardised the colours of the fire extinguishers so you can't see at a distance what type they are. Way to go....
The EU always fixes things when they ain't broke that's their problem. Oh and unelected faceless bureaucrats moving parliaments every month at the cost of millions.
My Bulgarian wife (she got British nationality in March) has just come into the living room and told me she's made a decision on the referendum.
She's voting Leave.
Golly, what's changed her mind?
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
She has moved from firm Remain, to undecided, to (now) Leave.
She remains pro-European but agreed with me that the EU is just never going to change unless they suffer the shock of losing one of their main members, and we learn to collaborate and cooperate rather than force, threaten and compel against the democratic will of the peoples across Europe.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
No, not really. A lot of common safety standards come from the WTO, by consensus for example.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
It may well do, but is all of that actually necessary?
Does anyone have a prediction for the day that the exchanges magically make LEAVE the favourite. I remember seeing Corbo's odds tumbling in one afternoon/evening last year and cashing out too soon....
That is hard - but the people betting on leave are those generally with not too much money, having had their wages squeezed by excessive EU (and non EU) immigration.
It still seems incredible that the odds are 11/4 against - when the online polls aren't picking up the C2DEs who have no computers or use them for other things - and who may not now have landlines just PAYG mobiles and so are slipping through the phone pollers.
Pollsters do demographic sampling and/or weighting so they won't be missing C2DEs in general. In theory it's possible there could be a low-communications subgroup within those demographics that leans more Leave than the rest, but I don't think there's any evidence for that.
US presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has warned that electing Donald Trump would be a "historic mistake".
Speaking in San Diego, California, the Democratic front-runner launched her most blistering attack yet on her likely Republican rival in November's White House election. The former Secretary of State assailed Mr Trump's foreign policy pronouncements, saying: "He is temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability and immense responsibility.
"This is not someone who should ever have the nuclear codes."
Britain will always be in Europe - but we are certainly not better off overall in the EU - if you look at the slogan you will see that even the name for the Remain Campaign is wrong and misleading.
I will agree to disagree with you. I'm not looking for an argument - I was just merely illustrating the point that I am a Remainer who believes that Leave will win.
OK - nice to be honest. Regrettably my T-shirt becomes obsolete on 24th June.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
There are also examples where the EU has produced standards which are downright dangerous. An example I have discussed in the past with Mr Twisted on here is fire extinguishers where the EU standard now makes it far more difficult to tell from a distance what type of fire extinguisher is hanging on a wall. The rest of the world has a much better system.
Then there is changing the colour of Wiring. AC went from red/black to blue/brown.
Positive earthed d.c. used in telecoms etc went from blue black to grey blue. Unfortunately where blue was -48v it is now 0v. Its also illegal to use the old wiring colour on mods to existing installations so blue can be either neutral or live. Brilliant.
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
For it to operate in that way with any longevity it also needs an outside guarantor of security. It's dangerously complacent to think that the US will play that role in perpetuity, particularly given recent developments.
No, its constituent countries need to maintain armed forces and as they have a common interest they are likely to act together when they feel collectively threatened. NATO fills that role as the US & Canada currently feels they have an interest, but if they no longer play there is nothing stopping us carrying on.
Sure, there's nothing stopping us carrying on, but when there's no NATO, and Germany's hard power is obliged to match its economic power while there's a Russian menace on the periphery and no political coherence to the unity of the democratic states, I don't think that scenario ends well.
Pre-World War I there was plenty of economic interdependence but it didn't prevent that tragedy from occurring.
In all honesty if NATO were gone there is absolutely nothing the Europeans could do to compensate for that as far as the potential threat from Russia is concerned. With the exception of the UK and France no country in Europe (either inside or outside the EU) seems to be willing to spend anywhere near what is necessary to maintain the security of our continent without American support. It is a measure of how important a US backed NATO is to our peace that there is no way the EU or any other body could ever compensate for its loss.
Mail is out in a big way and has lost any pretence to balance but the Mail on Sunday seems in. The Mail is only delivered because of my wife's liking of the crosswords. Otherwise it would be changed for the Express which seems much fairer !!!!!!!
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
She has moved from firm Remain, to undecided, to (now) Leave.
She remains pro-European but agreed with me that the EU is just never going to change unless they suffer the shock of losing one of their main members, and we learn to collaborate and cooperate rather than force, threaten and compel against the democratic will of the peoples across Europe.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
No, not really. A lot of common safety standards come from the WTO, by consensus for example.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
It may well do, but is all of that actually necessary?
Well, I guess it's not necessary in the sense that we could live without it, but it does make trading a whole lot easier and, generally, safer. There are few things in life that are absolutely necessary.
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
I doubt if anybody's confident at all. It's rather that, previously, it seemed there was no chance of Leave winning. Now, it doesn't look utterly impossible.
Thursday night on the 23rd will be at least as exciting as Election Night, IMHO.
No. More so, as it will make elections actually mean something.
Monitoring the movement of the pound from mid afternoon could be the key
I've been monitoring the movement of the pound and indeed the markets for the last 10 years. Since 2008, they've been on crack.
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
For it to operate in that way with any longevity it also needs an outside guarantor of security. It's dangerously complacent to think that the US will play that role in perpetuity, particularly given recent developments.
No, its constituent countries need to maintain armed forces and as they have a common interest they are likely to act together when they feel collectively threatened. NATO fills that role as the US & Canada currently feels they have an interest, but if they no longer play there is nothing stopping us carrying on.
Sure, there's nothing stopping us carrying on, but when there's no NATO, and Germany's hard power is obliged to match its economic power while there's a Russian menace on the periphery and no political coherence to the unity of the democratic states, I don't think that scenario ends well.
Pre-World War I there was plenty of economic interdependence but it didn't prevent that tragedy from occurring.
The biggest issue is that currently no one in Europe (apart from Greece) want's to spend the money on defence. That is what putting a strain on NATO.
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
I doubt if anybody's confident at all. It's rather that, previously, it seemed there was no chance of Leave winning. Now, it doesn't look utterly impossible.
Thursday night on the 23rd will be at least as exciting as Election Night, IMHO.
No. More so, as it will make elections actually mean something.
Monitoring the movement of the pound from mid afternoon could be the key
I've been monitoring the movement of the pound and indeed the markets for the last 10 years. Since 2008, they've been on crack.
Believe the speculators are spending £500,000 on their own private exit poll
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
I doubt if anybody's confident at all. It's rather that, previously, it seemed there was no chance of Leave winning. Now, it doesn't look utterly impossible.
Thursday night on the 23rd will be at least as exciting as Election Night, IMHO.
No. More so, as it will make elections actually mean something.
It will probably be more exciting simply because a Leave vote spells unfixable disaster. But the referendum should not be happening.
It should be happening. We will have to agree to differ on that.
My Bulgarian wife (she got British nationality in March) has just come into the living room and told me she's made a decision on the referendum.
She's voting Leave.
Golly, what's changed her mind?
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
No, not really. A lot of common safety standards come from the WTO, by consensus for example.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
Yeah ....they standardised the colours of the fire extinguishers so you can't see at a distance what type they are. Way to go....
The EU always fixes things when they ain't broke that's their problem. Oh and unelected faceless bureaucrats moving parliaments every month at the cost of millions.
Does anyone have a prediction for the day that the exchanges magically make LEAVE the favourite. I remember seeing Corbo's odds tumbling in one afternoon/evening last year and cashing out too soon....
I think if another phone poll showed a Leave lead its price would head fast towards 2ish and it would go odds-on if there was further confirmation.
Of course the online polls haven't moved so far but they could.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
There are also examples where the EU has produced standards which are downright dangerous. An example I have discussed in the past with Mr Twisted on here is fire extinguishers where the EU standard now makes it far more difficult to tell from a distance what type of fire extinguisher is hanging on a wall. The rest of the world has a much better system.
Then there is changing the colour of Wiring. AC went from red/black to blue/brown.
Positive earthed d.c. used in telecoms etc went from blue black to grey blue. Unfortunately where blue was -48v it is now 0v. Its also illegal to use the old wiring colour on mods to existing installations so blue can be either neutral or live. Brilliant.
In the UK you are not allowed sockets in the bathrooms with exception of shaver sockets. In Europe you can. Quite often these sockets are over sinks and I have even seen them positioned next to the bath.
I quite like Liz Truss - but someone ought to tell her that her holding thumb and fore finger together when making every point is far too distracting for a TV appearance.
Just as long as she doesn't start ranting about cheese...
She's already done that. Apparently they employ lots of EU migrants who would lose their jobs if we left...
Does anyone have a prediction for the day that the exchanges magically make LEAVE the favourite. I remember seeing Corbo's odds tumbling in one afternoon/evening last year and cashing out too soon....
That is hard - but the people betting on leave are those generally with not too much money, having had their wages squeezed by excessive EU (and non EU) immigration.
It still seems incredible that the odds are 11/4 against - when the online polls aren't picking up the C2DEs who have no computers or use them for other things - and who may not now have landlines just PAYG mobiles and so are slipping through the phone pollers.
Saw an advert today for a mobile-phone receptionist service - all your callers speak first to them & only the ones you want to speak to get put through. Rules out cold-callers.
Anyone who thinks the pound is going to move during the day doesn't know what they're talking about.
The pattern of people voting during polling hours varies dramatically (simplifying massively, workers in the morning, non-workers in the day, workers in the evening). On top of that, we don't have previous referenda to compare voting patterns to, among these groups. It's not like GEs.
So, what will an exit poll taken at 2pm actually mean? Not much is the answer.
One taken at 6pm or 7pm may mean something, but if you factor in (at least) a 1 hour turnaround time from polling data collection through to analysis and then feedback to the client it doesn't leave much time for a play on the currency markets.
If people seriously believe there'd be a play on the currency markets which would then feedback in the media to people who have yet to vote, and yet to decide how to vote, in the final hours of polling, then they are living in PB bubble fantasy land.
Anyone who thinks the pound is going to move during the day doesn't know what they're talking about.
The pattern of people voting during polling hours varies dramatically (simplifying massively, workers in the morning, non-workers in the day, workers in the evening). On top of that, we don't have previous referenda to compare voting patterns to, among these groups. It's not like GEs.
So, what will an exit poll taken at 2pm actually mean? Not much is the answer.
One taken at 6pm or 7pm may mean something, but if you factor in (at least) a 1 hour turnaround time from polling data collection through to analysis and then feedback to the client it doesn't leave much time for a play on the currency markets.
If people seriously believe there'd be a play on the currency markets which would then feedback in the media to people who have yet to vote, and yet to decide how to vote, in the final hours of polling, then they are living in PB bubble fantasy land.
This is a measure of how confident I am about the referendum:
A few days ago I went to the Britain Stronger in Europe online shop to choose a t-shirt. I liked the one with the simple slogan "I'm In" the best... But if we leave the EU then I'd not be able to go on wearing it without looking really daft - as, obviously, I'd not be "in" at that point. So I opted for a "Britian Stronger in Europe" slogan t-shirt instead. It's not as nice as the other one but I can can keep on wearing it even if we leave the EU as the slogan will still be a statement of principle and belief.
If Leave win I'll be commissioning my "Don't Blame Me I voted Remain" T-shirt and I reckon I'll be wearing it by Christmas!
I quite like Liz Truss - but someone ought to tell her that her holding thumb and fore finger together when making every point is far too distracting for a TV appearance.
Just as long as she doesn't start ranting about cheese...
She's already done that. Apparently they employ lots of EU migrants who would lose their jobs if we left...
Does anyone have a prediction for the day that the exchanges magically make LEAVE the favourite. I remember seeing Corbo's odds tumbling in one afternoon/evening last year and cashing out too soon....
I think if another phone poll showed a Leave lead its price would head fast towards 2ish and it would go odds-on if there was further confirmation.
Of course the online polls haven't moved so far but they could.
Yeah - my feeling is that a different pollster needs to show a decent swing to Leave too...
I have to do a regular firefighting course as part of my offshore training and no matter how long ago this change was introduced it is still mentioned with scorn by the firefighters on every single course.
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
For it to operate in that way with any longevity it also needs an outside guarantor of security. It's dangerously complacent to think that the US will play that role in perpetuity, particularly given recent developments.
No, its constituent countries need to maintain armed forces and as they have a common interest they are likely to act together when they feel collectively threatened. NATO fills that role as the US & Canada currently feels they have an interest, but if they no longer play there is nothing stopping us carrying on.
Sure, there's nothing stopping us carrying on, but when there's no NATO, and Germany's hard power is obliged to match its economic power while there's a Russian menace on the periphery and no political coherence to the unity of the democratic states, I don't think that scenario ends well.
Pre-World War I there was plenty of economic interdependence but it didn't prevent that tragedy from occurring.
The biggest issue is that currently no one in Europe (apart from Greece) want's to spend the money on defence. That is what putting a strain on NATO.
Something that troubles me about the US-pulls-out scenario (which we have to plan for) is that if we leave the EU we will have next to no soft power in Europe. And without us I don't see a European defensive alliance working.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
There are also examples where the EU has produced standards which are downright dangerous. An example I have discussed in the past with Mr Twisted on here is fire extinguishers where the EU standard now makes it far more difficult to tell from a distance what type of fire extinguisher is hanging on a wall. The rest of the world has a much better system.
Then there is changing the colour of Wiring. AC went from red/black to blue/brown.
Positive earthed d.c. used in telecoms etc went from blue black to grey blue. Unfortunately where blue was -48v it is now 0v. Its also illegal to use the old wiring colour on mods to existing installations so blue can be either neutral or live. Brilliant.
In the UK you are not allowed sockets in the bathrooms with exception of shaver sockets. In Europe you can. Quite often these sockets are over sinks and I have even seen them positioned next to the bath.
I stayed in a place in India with the main fusebox complete with naked wiring in the shower.
First, she made me swear not to tell a soul (and now I've just publicly told all you lot) and then confessed to me.
She has moved from firm Remain, to undecided, to (now) Leave.
She remains pro-European but agreed with me that the EU is just never going to change unless they suffer the shock of losing one of their main members, and we learn to collaborate and cooperate rather than force, threaten and compel against the democratic will of the peoples across Europe.
How, in concrete terms, would she like the EU to change? In what way does she consider the EU to be acting against the democratic will of its people?
Drop me a vanilla email and I'll invite you round for an interview.
I'm happy for you, or anyone else here to answer, and am genuinely interested. What concrete measures would you like to see implemented to fix the EU?
I have posted on this repeatedly in recent days and weeks.
I want a common trade area not a common government. I want free self-governing democracies cooperating and colloboraring with one another not supranational institutions legislating on their behalf.
If you want to ask my wife, you'll have to ask her yourself.
That would mean the end of the single market, wouldn't it?
No, not really. A lot of common safety standards come from the WTO, by consensus for example.
It's not just safety standards. The last example that I came across in my work is the colour coding for different types of bottled gas. This is standardised in the EU: white for oxygen, red for hydrogen, etc., but varies around the rest of the world. There are countless examples of such standardisation at the EU level, which, in general, benefits the industries involved.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
It may well do, but is all of that actually necessary?
Well, I guess it's not necessary in the sense that we could live without it, but it does make trading a whole lot easier and, generally, safer. There are few things in life that are absolutely necessary.
Would you like some examples of completely bonkers regulations? There are loads.
This site has become over confident on Brexit. They have had a good few days but the majority of journalists thought DC did well tonight despite the hostility. Lets see how Gove gets on tomorrow
I doubt if anybody's confident at all. It's rather that, previously, it seemed there was no chance of Leave winning. Now, it doesn't look utterly impossible.
Thursday night on the 23rd will be at least as exciting as Election Night, IMHO.
No. More so, as it will make elections actually mean something.
Monitoring the movement of the pound from mid afternoon could be the key
I've been monitoring the movement of the pound and indeed the markets for the last 10 years. Since 2008, they've been on crack.
Believe the speculators are spending £500,000 on their own private exit poll
And how am I going to tell over the usual crack induced movements? Scott P keeps on posting when there is a correlation with the polls but it isn't necessarily so.
A Single market does not need a Parliament, currency, court that promotes political integration, Commission or tens of thousands of directives and regulations which have nothing to do with trade. It needs a court or council to adjudicate on matters of trade compliance and a secretariate to oversee negotiations. Nothing more.
For it to operate in that way with any longevity it also needs an outside guarantor of security. It's dangerously complacent to think that the US will play that role in perpetuity, particularly given recent developments.
No, its constituent countries need to maintain armed forces and as they have a common interest they are likely to act together when they feel collectively threatened. NATO fills that role as the US & Canada currently feels they have an interest, but if they no longer play there is nothing stopping us carrying on.
Sure, there's nothing stopping us carrying on, but when there's no NATO, and Germany's hard power is obliged to match its economic power while there's a Russian menace on the periphery and no political coherence to the unity of the democratic states, I don't think that scenario ends well.
Pre-World War I there was plenty of economic interdependence but it didn't prevent that tragedy from occurring.
In all honesty if NATO were gone there is absolutely nothing the Europeans could do to compensate for that as far as the potential threat from Russia is concerned. With the exception of the UK and France no country in Europe (either inside or outside the EU) seems to be willing to spend anywhere near what is necessary to maintain the security of our continent without American support. It is a measure of how important a US backed NATO is to our peace that there is no way the EU or any other body could ever compensate for its loss.
Well it is obviously possible for the EU or perhaps a European Defence Organisation to step up to the mark. The first hurdle would be getting the European countries to actually spend the money needed for their defence. Some never have, none are currently (including, to our shame, the UK) and none ever will. The next problem is actually getting them to fight, even NATO, cannot do this. Belgium wouldn't even sell us artillery shells for use in Gulf War 1, because they were scared of reprisals (there was a famous Matt cartoon at the time) and the European countries response to the NATO missions in the Balkans and Afghanistan have been variable to say the least.
So it is not impossible for Europe to compensate for a collapse of NATO, just that the political will is not there and never will be there to do so.
I have to do a regular firefighting course as art of my offshore training and no matter how long ago this change was introduced it is still mentioned with scorn by the firefighters on every single course.
I don't know, but I imagine the rationale for this was that the vast majority of the population are not aware of which colour stands for which type of extinguisher, but would immediately recognise red as a fire extinguisher. There is a risk with other colours that a member of the general public (British or foreign) might not even recognise the device to be a fire extinguisher.
There will always be room to dispute with any standardisation decisions, but the general principle of standardisation to facilitate trade and safety still stands. This is the foundation of the single market.
Did anyone say we did? We don't pay much at all into NATO. We are supposed to spend 2% on defence as part of NATO (which we do, once the books have been simmered for a sufficiently long period)
Anyone who thinks the pound is going to move during the day doesn't know what they're talking about.
The pattern of people voting during polling hours varies dramatically (simplifying massively, workers in the morning, non-workers in the day, workers in the evening). On top of that, we don't have previous referenda to compare voting patterns to, among these groups. It's not like GEs.
So, what will an exit poll taken at 2pm actually mean? Not much is the answer.
One taken at 6pm or 7pm may mean something, but if you factor in (at least) a 1 hour turnaround time from polling data collection through to analysis and then feedback to the client it doesn't leave much time for a play on the currency markets.
If people seriously believe there'd be a play on the currency markets which would then feedback in the media to people who have yet to vote, and yet to decide how to vote, in the final hours of polling, then they are living in PB bubble fantasy land.
I believe at one point an American financial house paid for a several-miles-long fibre-optic cable in an exact-straight-line (compensating for the earth's curvature) instead of the normal routing because they wanted to minimise speed-of-light delay.
Anecdotally, the 80's a surprising amount of mainframes were sold to Colombia, because the cartels wanted the best computers even though they were *wildly* over spec.
Rich people who don't know much about the detail but want it fast, cope with things by throwing money at experts until they under perform. A rolling exit poll might not actually be that useful but they will pay for a small advantage.
I have to do a regular firefighting course as art of my offshore training and no matter how long ago this change was introduced it is still mentioned with scorn by the firefighters on every single course.
I don't know, but I imagine the rationale for this was that the vast majority of the population are not aware of which colour stands for which type of extinguisher, but would immediately recognise red as a fire extinguisher. There is a risk with other colours that a member of the general public (British or foreign) might not even recognise the device to be a fire extinguisher.
There will always be room to dispute any standardisation decisions, but the general principle of standardisation to facilitate trade and safety still stands. This is the foundation of the single market.
The need for standardisation is only valid if you assume all citizens and subjects of all member states are a) thinking along the same lines and b) so foolish as to not be able to define what good is in any given widget.
Did anyone say we did? We don't pay much at all into NATO. We are supposed to spend 2% on defence as part of NATO (which we do, once the books have been simmered for a sufficiently long period)
Thursday night on the 23rd will be at least as exciting as Election Night, IMHO.
No. More so, as it will make elections actually mean something.
What precisely does this one mean, Mr White? I did say "precisely".....
In short, politicians who promise to say, get net immigration down to less than 100K will be held properly to account when they don't have a workable plan and thrown out if they break their promises.
Anyone who thinks the pound is going to move during the day doesn't know what they're talking about.
The pattern of people voting during polling hours varies dramatically (simplifying massively, workers in the morning, non-workers in the day, workers in the evening). On top of that, we don't have previous referenda to compare voting patterns to, among these groups. It's not like GEs.
So, what will an exit poll taken at 2pm actually mean? Not much is the answer.
One taken at 6pm or 7pm may mean something, but if you factor in (at least) a 1 hour turnaround time from polling data collection through to analysis and then feedback to the client it doesn't leave much time for a play on the currency markets.
If people seriously believe there'd be a play on the currency markets which would then feedback in the media to people who have yet to vote, and yet to decide how to vote, in the final hours of polling, then they are living in PB bubble fantasy land.
Say the polls pick up 55-45 REMAIN by 2pm. That'd be useful to know, right? I would be pretty sure REMAIN was safe then.
Does anyone have a prediction for the day that the exchanges magically make LEAVE the favourite. I remember seeing Corbo's odds tumbling in one afternoon/evening last year and cashing out too soon....
That is hard - but the people betting on leave are those generally with not too much money, having had their wages squeezed by excessive EU (and non EU) immigration.
It still seems incredible that the odds are 11/4 against - when the online polls aren't picking up the C2DEs who have no computers or use them for other things - and who may not now have landlines just PAYG mobiles and so are slipping through the phone pollers.
Saw an advert today for a mobile-phone receptionist service - all your callers speak first to them & only the ones you want to speak to get put through. Rules out cold-callers.
Haven't got a link for that service have you? Sounds brilliant to me if it is not too expensive.
I quite like Liz Truss - but someone ought to tell her that her holding thumb and fore finger together when making every point is far too distracting for a TV appearance.
Just as long as she doesn't start ranting about cheese...
She's already done that. Apparently they employ lots of EU migrants who would lose their jobs if we left...
Is it a disgrace? :-)
I get the impression she thinks the loss of cheese exports would be a disgrace but I can't recall if she said it.
Comments
What is far more disappointing is how little value was put on that Union when Cameron was trying to negotiate a package that he could sell to the British people. That is looking like a serious mistake.
Look where the EU comes in the MORI issues index. It's an issue the vast majority of people haven't cared much about and haven't thought much about.
It may be that people are giving a positive - ie Remain or Leave - answer to pollsters. But people don't like saying Don't Know and I suspect even those who think they have decided may change - because views are not embedded in the same way as, for example, Party voting intention.
So, in my view, anything could happen.
The level of standardisation in the European single market goes way beyond the remit of the WTO.
I'd never vote for the bastard, though, or his boss. Their association with, and seeming affection for, murders is not forgivable for me.
Pre-World War I there was plenty of economic interdependence but it didn't prevent that tragedy from occurring.
It still seems incredible that the odds are 11/4 against - when the online polls aren't picking up the C2DEs who have no computers or use them for other things - and who may not now have landlines just PAYG mobiles and so are slipping through the phone pollers.
The EU always fixes things when they ain't broke that's their problem. Oh and unelected faceless bureaucrats moving parliaments every month at the cost of millions.
https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/738487543595962368
Unfortunately, idiots on panel get to reply.
Liz Truss is fairly pathetic, Neil Hamilton and Frank Field worse.
US presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton has warned that electing Donald Trump would be a "historic mistake".
Speaking in San Diego, California, the Democratic front-runner launched her most blistering attack yet on her likely Republican rival in November's White House election. The former Secretary of State assailed Mr Trump's foreign policy pronouncements, saying: "He is temperamentally unfit to hold an office that requires knowledge, stability and immense responsibility.
"This is not someone who should ever have the nuclear codes."
http://news.sky.com/story/1706049/clinton-says-trump-must-not-have-nuclear-codes
Positive earthed d.c. used in telecoms etc went from blue black to grey blue. Unfortunately where blue was -48v it is now 0v. Its also illegal to use the old wiring colour on mods to existing installations so blue can be either neutral or live. Brilliant.
There! Corrected it for you.
FIre extinguishers used to be red, cream, black, blue or green and then are now red, red, red, red or red with small coloured patches iirc.
http://www.mfs-fire-extinguishers.co.uk/types.htm
Of course the online polls haven't moved so far but they could.
The pattern of people voting during polling hours varies dramatically (simplifying massively, workers in the morning, non-workers in the day, workers in the evening). On top of that, we don't have previous referenda to compare voting patterns to, among these groups. It's not like GEs.
So, what will an exit poll taken at 2pm actually mean? Not much is the answer.
One taken at 6pm or 7pm may mean something, but if you factor in (at least) a 1 hour turnaround time from polling data collection through to analysis and then feedback to the client it doesn't leave much time for a play on the currency markets.
If people seriously believe there'd be a play on the currency markets which would then feedback in the media to people who have yet to vote, and yet to decide how to vote, in the final hours of polling, then they are living in PB bubble fantasy land.
"What's the problem? The secret service were stationed outside the door to the basement at all times..."
Unfit doesn't even begin to describe it.
Sounds suspiciously like some no-mark who judges their effectiveness by how many meetings she attends.
Frank Field is hopeless as a communicator however.
I washed very carefully!
It is just foolish.
https://twitter.com/Daily_Express/status/738478777500598272
Lab 525 UKIP 314 Con 264 Green 41
Result May 2015
Con 1153 Lab 1065 UKIP 840
So it is not impossible for Europe to compensate for a collapse of NATO, just that the political will is not there and never will be there to do so.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/bryan-pagliano-fifth-amendment-223796
There will always be room to dispute with any standardisation decisions, but the general principle of standardisation to facilitate trade and safety still stands. This is the foundation of the single market.
Anecdotally, the 80's a surprising amount of mainframes were sold to Colombia, because the cartels wanted the best computers even though they were *wildly* over spec.
Rich people who don't know much about the detail but want it fast, cope with things by throwing money at experts until they under perform. A rolling exit poll might not actually be that useful but they will pay for a small advantage.
It is a bogus argument.