Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » 2016 Oscar betting: Roger marks your card

SystemSystem Posts: 11,693
edited February 2016 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » 2016 Oscar betting: Roger marks your card

politicalbetting.com is proudly powered by WordPress
with "Neat!" theme. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • Options
    asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276
    Thank you
  • Options
    AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900
    Good stuff. Hadn't realised The Revenant was Inarritu again, I have liked his past output as far back as Amores Perros.
  • Options
    RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    You missed out the Golden Turkey Award:

    Clinton Barking at the Moon...
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Welcome to yet another GOP debate, the 10th or 11th one.

    CNN has the Bushes in the audience.
    The moderators look like committed anti-Trumpers.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Cruz has his hand inside his suit like Napoleon.
    There is also Jindal in the audience, looks like CNN has stuffed the audience with Rubio people.
  • Options
    PongPong Posts: 4,693
    Speedy said:

    Welcome to yet another GOP debate, the 10th or 11th one.

    CNN has the Bushes in the audience.
    The moderators look like committed anti-Trumpers.

    Have you made your mind up who you're supporting yet, Speedy?

    ;)
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Pong said:

    Speedy said:

    Welcome to yet another GOP debate, the 10th or 11th one.

    CNN has the Bushes in the audience.
    The moderators look like committed anti-Trumpers.

    Have you made your mind up who you're supporting yet, Speedy?

    ;)
    Not Hugh Hewitt or Anna Navarro.
    Those are bush people, not exactly neutral.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Opening statements

    Carson; if someone can described america, america heads to the abyss of destruction, we will not offer solutions by destroying each other.

    Kasich: I watched the early coverage, my father was a coal miner, my mother didn't speak english, i run for president, shoot for the stars america is great.

    Rubio: we have to decide 21st century, 36 years ago reagan, conservatism, hopes dreams, are we still conservatives, i hope we are.

    Cruz: welcome to texas, here my mom, here my father washed dishes, i graduated from baptists, i will fight for you.

    Trump: my whole theme make america great again, we dont win anymore, we dont win, obamacare, we dont win, borders like swiss cheese, we will win, we will win a lot.
  • Options
    peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,875
    edited February 2016
    I imagine Roger would readily concede that even those of us who know very little about the nominations for the 20 categories he has covered could probably correctly forecast at least half the winners - purely on the basis that in 14 instances (or 70%), the odds-on favourite in each case is on offer at foregone conclusion odds of between 1/4 and 1/100. It would be surprising if more than 2 or 3 of these failed to come up trumps.
    That said, Roger has come up with some interesting picks in the remaining 6 categories, where the best decimal odds currently available are as follows:

    Supporting Actor:
    Mark Rylance ....... 4.3 Betfair Exchange

    Supporting Actress:
    Rooney Mara ....... 9.4 Betfair Exchange

    Costume Design:
    Carol ...... 6.0 Betfair Sportsbook

    Sound Editing:
    The Revenant (Best Odds) ...... 3.5 BetFred

    Sound Mixing:
    The Revenant (Best Odds) ...... 2.5 BetFred

    Visual Effects:
    The Revenant ....... 17 Bet365
    Ex Machina ........ 81 Bet365
    (At those crazy odds, it has to be worth backing both Roger's picks!)

    I've had between 50p and £5 on each of the above - any one of these has to come up for me to just about get my total stake money back. Roger will surely manage that .... won't he?
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Questions about immigration on Trump
    Deport 11 million, no one else wants to do it.

    Trump: Cruz was leading amnesty you can ask Marco, you wouldnt ask me if i never brought it, those illegals will go, they can come back legally, the best of them through the process.

    Cruz: the hardworking people are forgotten, illegal immigrants are forgotten, the business owners are complaining, but social costs fell, unemployment fell, no to legal immigrants, no citizenship.

    Trump, i have the toughest man in arizona to endorse me.

    Rubio: first of all, before we do anything, we will secure the border, visa overstays, e-verify, in 2011 and 2012 Trump was soft on immigration, Trump hires foreigners, its an important issue.

    Trump: self deportation, is some to go and not, some people I hired, people didn't want part time jobs, for holiday seasons.

    Rubio: you criticized romney over self deportation.

    Trump: Romney ran a terrible campaign.

    Rubio: i wish we should have won, its an important point, its an important point, you are the only one who hired illegals.

    Trump: I;m the only one who hard hired any people, you havent hired hired anyone.

    Rubio: trump polish workers.

    Trump i hired tens of thousands of people, everything was fine 30 years ago.

  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Cruz: US citizens can come back, I ran on illegal immigration, I lead the fight against amnesty, in 2013 Trump fired Dennis Rodman, Trump funded the gang of 8, Trump fought for open borders, I am the only one, Rubio is right against Trump.

    Trump: I have said it loudly here, the audience is packed, i had a good relation with lots of politicians, i get along with everybody, you have not one senator backing you and you work with these people.

    Cruz: Trump is right he would open borders, you should stand up against washington, if you are liked in washington you are not president.

    Trump: cruz didn't put his loans from the big bad banks and he talks corruption.

    Kasich: We have a great president George Bush, Regan passed a path to legalization, back then it worked, i favour a guest worker program, if they had not committed a crime i would give them a path we will not grab people, lets start solving problems, coalition, plan in 100 days.

    Carson: I believe for liberty and justice, we need to secure all the borders, the people who are already here, we need to be reasonable, 6 month guest workers, not citizens, that is fair.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Question to trump about the wall

    Trump: I will and the wall has gone 10 ft taller, I saw him make that statement, that used a filthy disgusting word on TV, we have a trade deficit, not including the drugs, we will make the wall, the wall costs 10-12 billion, the great wall of china, this is a real wall, mexico will pay for it, it's a small portion of the money we lose, i don't mind trade wars if we are losing so much, with china, i don't like to lose 500 billion, they took oreos, they took carrier.

    Rubio: polish workers, trump ties are made of mexico.

    Trump: they devalue their currencies, we cant compete with them
    Rubio: fake university

    Trump: And they did a good job.

    Trump: this is a guy who bought a house then sells it to a lobbyist.
    Rubio he borrowed 1 million dollars.

    Trump I borrowed 1 million and made it into 10 billion
    Rubio: show it to taxes.

    I have that screaming Rubio girl.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    edited February 2016
    Thanks, Roger. One feature of the Oscars betting is an odds-on favourite in every category, including 1/100 Inside Out and Di Caprio. Good for those who like to wade in on near-certainties but it does mean that even the second best will be at a working man's price.

    For instance, in the Best Director stakes, Inarittu (The Revenant) is a best-priced 1/7 but Roger's second-best, Lenny Abrahamson for Room, is the outsider of the field at 125/1 with Skybet. Roger's "interesting longshot" for Visual Effects is 80/1 with the Tote, Betfred and Bet365.

    Edit: peter_from_putney has a better post along these lines.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Moderator talking to rubio in spanish.

    Rubio: we will eliminate that executive order, i know people, executive orders are unconstitutional, but this is not about deportation, daca is unconstitutional, i am sympathetic but its unconstitutional, constitution.
    I am going to eliminate daca, that is how the program goes down.

    Trump: he lies alot

    Rubio: i guess there is a statute of limitaion on lies.

    Cruz: I am reminded about Rubios ethanol position in Iowa, same as it is like amnesty.

    Rubio: that is not accurate, by 2022 it will go away, ethanol, we will not yanking away from it, daca will end at some point, its the end but im sympathetic, constitution obama.

    Cruz: its extrordinary that the two of us are cubans, you can only be hispanic if you are liberal, i earned 40% of hispanics in texas, the values are faith family nation, i campaigned in the rio grande, i told my fathers story washing dishes, Obama-clinton economy, everyone struggling in the hispanic community.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Rubio: we are the party of diversity not the democrats, the hispanics dont care only about immigration, free enterprise, not socialism.

    Kasich: I m not goint to talk about that, a little girl said that she didn't like all that screaming, my view is economic growth, common sense, regulations, low taxes, economic growth, ohio, everybody can rise, our system, jack kempt, i think they like me, me my children my wife.

    Carson: The national association of latinos, i don't fear going there, this is america, liberty justice for all, that's the way, we don't pick, we are compassionate, fabric of america.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Trump: I don't believe everything Telemundo sais, i have employed thousands of hispanics, i won with men, i won with women, i won with hispanics, they get it, i will bring back jobs , they get it, look at the election, record numbers, and i won with record numbers, new republican party.

    Trump: i;m doing very well with hispanics, i settled my suit with univision, i will do really well with hispanics, i have respect but i will do very well, new stronger republican party
  • Options
    Surely Kasich has to hit at least 15% to have any chance of staying in the race, unless of course he's just hanging around in the hope that as a reward for his his endorsement, he'll be offered the Veep gig by the eventual winner.
  • Options
    Funny it's the right playing identity politics in America.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Cruz: Justice scalia, scalia, i knew him for 20 years, we are only one justice away form the end of life and guns, in the past presidents, half of the prople appointed by republicans were a disaster, who do you know, every justoce i nominate will defend the bill of rights.

    Trump: I will uphold religious liberty, justice roberts was strongly pushed by cruz and gave us obamacare, I know Ted feels bad about it, this happened.

    Cruz: It was George W not me, i would have nominated someone else, this is a man who gave money to democrats who support far left, he will cut a deal not fight, i will defend.

    Trump: i watched ted for 2 days talk and nothing happened, its wonderful, he's been attacking my sister but alito signed that bill too, will he apologioze.

    Cruz: I will not apologize for the constitution, democrats are crazies, Reid said he supported Trump, you will cut a deal will Reid.

    Rubio: This is an important question, justice scalia, constitution, the next president, Trump said but his record is not on our side, the bottom line, Trump will not be on our side, he defended planned parenthood, he said that he will be neutral for Isreal.

    Trump: Regan, planned parenthood, i'm against abortion, however breast cancer womens health are helped by planned parenthood.

    Kasich: I;m against gay marriage, i have moved on, were does it end, tommorow if i dont sell to gays i will not sell to divorces. commerce, the supreme court of ohio, not narrow.

    Carson: Justice scalia, i met him, religious freedom, constitution, gays have the same rights, no extra rights, that's unfair, congress has to overrule the supreme court, i will look at their past, fruit salad of life
  • Options
    peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,875
    edited February 2016
    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Rubio: Trump said that he likes the mandate, repeal obamacare, heath savings account, tax credit, not obamacare, its bad, pert time, job killing, replace it.

    Trump: I agree with that but pre existing conditions not ok, I will keep that, the insurance companies get want they want, obamacare threw out of the window, lobbyists, they are part of the problem, get rid of the lines, they make a fortune, i will do what is right, the price will go down, the insurance companies are friends of mine i know them, he is not laughing anymore, they are making a fortune, we should keep pre existing conditions.

    Rubio: I took out the bailout, the insurance companies are suing me, what is your plan what is your plan what is your plan.

    Trump: I watched him melt down 2 weeks ago with christie, i will get rid of the plan, competition, instead of one company you will have many, you have competition.

    Rubio: now he is repeating himself.

    Trump: I dont repeat my self you repeat himself, you reated himself 5 minutes ago.
    Rubio: you repeat again make america great again.

    Trump: i tell the truth, we will have competition between the states, what's to add.

    Kasich: its a bit more complicated than that, repeal obamacare, ohio reform, dead squirels, the heritage foundation, if you are a hospital if you are bellow we will reward you, deductibles, people can't afford it, market transparency, low prices, affordable healthcare, not throw people in the cold, in episodes in our lives, they need support and rewards.

    Carson: Healthcare is not a right, we spend twice as much, we pay for it with traditional healthcare,every family to be an insurance plan, uncle joe smoking, a lot less money, homeowners policy, 1500 10000 dollars per year, medicare budget, too many people, do the math, let me finish, the money is left, a menu for medicare part c, drug care, no one will want obamacare.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Cruz: Trump things that planned parenthood is great, i will prosecute them, trump wants socialized medicine, socialized medicine kills jobs and will kill you, no you wont get that hip replacement i will repeal obamacare.

    Trump: i do not want socialized medicine, obamacare is a disaster, it doesn't work, premioums are going up, its going to destroy the economy.

    Cruz: Did you never say it

    Trump: We are going to have private healthcare,we will not have people die in the streets you may want to.

    Rubio: this is a republican debate

    Trump: call it what you want people will not die in the streets.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Trump: the country will become dynamic, we pay too much taxes, we have the highest taxes, trillions are outside, my tax plan, we will make spending cuts, department of education, EPA, cut the agencies and balance the budgets, waste fraud and abuse, in every agency waste fraud and abuse.

    Kasich: I have done a balanced budget in ohio, we cut taxes, balanced budget, job growth, common sense regulations, reasonable taxes, ohio, tax cuts, innovating, our credit is strong, shipping everything to the states, 4 years, ohio, jobs opportunity, i will do in 100 days.

    Trump: I like Kasich, but they struck oil in ohio.

    Kasich: oil doesn't matter, we have amazon, we are low taxes, economic growth, jobs, jobs jobs.

  • Options

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    All true but the breakfast team will doubtless be talking about the EU anyway.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Trump: I was the first one to file a financial statement, you don't find wealth with tax return, my companies have very little debt, Romney looked like a fool he didn't file until a month before the election, 12 years i have been audited, i get audited every year, i cant do it until the audit is finish.

    Trump: are you going to ask anyone else a question, i can't release them until the audit is done, as soon as it is done i will do it.

    Rubio: I will release them on saturday, there is nothing there, in 3 years 85% will be everything, only 15% will be the military, you have to cut social security, reform them unless the debt issue is dealt, national debt, debt crisis.

    Cruz: I will release them tomorrow, an audit will find if Trump lied, 65% think Trump is the wrong, realclear politics i beat hillary, the media will screw trump, hillary is corrupt and make the case, Trump gave money to hillary and cant take her on, we cant lose to hillary.

    Trump: i have gave money to everyone, i have beating him everyone in the polls, im beating him some policies, i got 36, 46, and he got 20 and 22 and S.C was his stronghold, i beat him about, I beat hillary look, i had only a little time to attack hillary and she got a rough week.

    Cruz: Trump said, Trump is afraid, Trump university with fraud case, the media will go crazy, Trump agrees with hillary sanders obama and cant beat her.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Trump: If i cant beat her you are going to get killed, Trump university is a civil case, i could settle it but I will not out of principal, i will win that case, i'm been audited because of the large size of mu company, until the audit is finished.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,101
    I'm really not sure how this debate will play. Rubio and Cruz are attacking Trump hard and landing some blows, but surely it's too late? I find Rubio so slimy I can't judge him impartially.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    First part verdict.

    Cruz and Rubio really are throwing the kitchen sink on Trump, its their last opportunity and they know it.

    Trump is bad when on defence but he counter attacks strongly as usual, I really hate that Rubio girl that screams everytime Rubio talks, and sometimes i can't hear what is going on by all the screams by the audience.
    Rubio's polish workers attack threw Trump off badly at the beginning, Cruz has replaced Bush as Trump's favourate squeeze toy.

    If this debate doesn't stop Trump nothing will.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Trump: Under Obama Israel has been treated horribly, i was at the israely parade, i received lots of awards from Israel, i will like to bring peace for israel , i have to be neutral if you want to bring peace.

    Crus: Hillary and Trump are neutral with israel, i will stand behind israel unapologeticly, palestinians are terrorists, Trump has done nothing to defend isreal.

    Trump: I have a great relationship with isreal, it will be great to bring peace there.

    Kasich: in 9/11, we are not certain were we stand, our allies don't know, S.Koreans, N.korea, china.

    Rubio: Trump doesnt realize that its an anti-israel positions, palestinians are bad and evil, hamas lauches rockets, no peace deal , no peace is possible, i should be president i will be on isreal side.

    Trump: Im a negotiator Marco is not a negotiator, I watched him meltdown.

    Rubio: a deal is not a deal

    Trump: a deal is a deal, you will never bring peace, i think i might be able.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Kasich: regime change in N.Korea, we have to do it immediately, sanctions on N.Korea, arm S.Korea with missiles and Japan, the chinese, regime change, national security, by any means, pressure the chinese, i might risk war, not kicking the can down the road, regime change, the chinese might do it, we have to be firm, missiles.

    Trump: We are in a position due to debt 19 trillion, we can't defend germany our s.korea, they are making a fortune, s.arabia, we defend them for peanuts, we have to be payed back.

    Kasich: the japanese and the europeans have to do more, balanced budget plan, reform pentagon, weapons system, bureaucrats.

    Carson: People say that i whine a lot, you said that you would be fair to me, what about taxes, taxes are wrong, i never got audited it until i got against obama, they wont find anything, get rid of the IRS, israel doesn't think we turned our backs, judeo-christian foundation, we have to be fair to our own child, Kim jon un understands strength, we need to have robust naval presence, SDI (star wars).
  • Options

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    Seconded - thank you Roger for a fascinating overview and carefully thought through recommendations - of the ones I've seen I'd agree with pretty much all of them - and like you I suspect Rylance's brilliant, but understated, performance will be overlooked.....
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,101
    Mitt Romney piling in on Trump too...

    Mitt Romney Verified account @MittRomney

    No legit reason @realDonaldTrump can't release returns while being audited, but if scared, release earlier returns no longer under audit.

  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited February 2016

    I'm really not sure how this debate will play. Rubio and Cruz are attacking Trump hard and landing some blows, but surely it's too late? I find Rubio so slimy I can't judge him impartially.

    Not only too late, but what is the point if they are both till in the race to split the anti-Trump vote! If they succeed in knocking a few percent off him he will still win most states by more than 20%.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Trump: i don't support the cease fire in syria, i like a ceasefire but it's not working, i would support it but it's not working.

    Cruz: obama is weak, russia has taken advantage of that, we need a clear difference with obama and hillary, libya, kerry, Trump and Rubio supported kerry, he's anti israel, no to kerry.

    Trump: i gave them both checks, i never discussed that subjects, if politicians were on the beach, Saddam and Gaddafi killed terrorists, isis is taking over the oil, we would have been better off.

    Rubio: we never toppled gaddafi, Cruz supports leading from behind, kerry is better than hillary, S.Korea and japan pay lots of money, we cant walk away because they will get nukes.

    Trump: i will not walk away but i will want them to pay money, im a tough critic of kerry, the iran deal is a disaster.

    Cruz: Trump said on Cruz.org, kerry was a disaster, obama boycotted isreal, bloomberg lifted the ban on isreal, were was Trump, why did he supported anti isreal, you dont write checks to anti isreal.

    Trump: i have done a lot about isreal, you are all talk and no action, this is a liar, and this is a joker.

    Rubio: This is a

    Carson: can somebody attack me please.
  • Options
    williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 48,101
    Speedy said:


    Carson: can somebody attack me please.

    Best line of the debate. :)
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Kasich: We should have taken out assad, we didnt act, libya, hillary did it not the people, isis is getting in libya, we will have to invade, isis in syria and iraq, strong and firm policy, total mess, arm the ukranians.

    Cruz: Trump called me a liar, what we are seeing with Trump is the Washington establishment, Carter supports Trump not me, accusing me of been a liar is a lie.

    Trump: i watched the lobbyists, i watched what cruz did to carson in iowa, i also watched his fake form, he scared people to vote cruz, it was worse, i know politicians better than you.

    Cruz: for 40 years you funded liberals.

    Trump: i funded you.

    messy fight.

    Trump: Go ahead dont get nervous, go ahead.
    Cruz: errmmm

    Cruz: excuse me.

    Moderator: you had your chance.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Rubio: i said, apple, fbi, apple said lies, self destruct mode, fbi, apple should comply, thats not what i said, the order by court to comply to apple, the phone wasn't, the apple brand is not superior.

    Cruz: Rubio was on both sides, now he agrees with me, apple should comply with the court order, i would agree with apple, enforce the court order against apple.

    Carson: Allowing terrorists to get away is bad for america, we have a constitution, but we have a judicial framework, fisa courts, i expect them to comply.

    Kasich: where is obama, you should work it out behind the scenes, make a meeting with apple and lock the door, protect the rights and get the right think, i do this all the time, an executive can do it.

    Moderator ask why canada doesnt get a wall

    Trump: we have far less problems with canada than mexico, in N.H. the biggest problem is heroin, it poors from the southern border, the problem with canada is that is too long border, its not our big problem, its the drugs that are coming in.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Puerto rico bailout question.

    Rubio: bankruptcy doesnt work, taxes are too high, the leadership has to put their house in order, if they do that we will think about it, it wont solve any problem, we would prefer a growing puerto rico.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Second part verdict.

    They are still throwing the kitchen sink on Trump, but it works less and less, Trump has found a new squeeze toy to replace Bush and he's called Cruz.

    Rubio is a more effective attacker on Trump than Cruz, but Trump is also adapting on their attacks, so much that Cruz was stuck speechless by Trump saying go ahead attack me if you dare after Trump said I also funded you over the Cruz attack that Trump funded liberals.

    Again if this debate doesn't stop Trump nothing will.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Closing statemenst

    Carson: what kind of leader do your kinds want to emulate, 30 years ago a movie was made about my hands, join my hands with mine.

    Kasich: The last poll had me beating hillary, balancing budgets, regulations, ohio, i have foreign policy experience, give me your vote, make america moving again.

    Rubio: we have come along way, identity of party and conservative movement, go to my website, but an end to this silliness, conservative movement.

    Cruz: washington deal are bad, i have stood up against deals, i will delete all laws, i will persecute planned parentood, abolish obamacare, no iran deal, i will bring jobs.

    Trump: i know politicians they are all talk no action, trade, taking care of our vets, no common core, obamacare, i will make it done, they will never make it done, make america great again.
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    Final verdict.

    The kitchen sink was thrown at Trump by Cruz and Rubio.
    They attacked him on everything about ideology, taxes, healthcare and isreal, Rubio did better that Cruz.
    On healthcare Rubio attacked Trump on specifics, that was both Trump's and Rubio's better segments, Trump by appearing compassionate, Rubio by making Trump lacking details.
    Trump still has a problem defending himself, but he's very effective attacking and counter attacking, he also gained time with his taxes by using the audit as his defence.
    Rubio came ahead on some areas like the repeating stuff on Trump but nothing damaging as Trump covered by counter attacking on Rubio and Romney, the polish jobs spat was an example.

    Cruz was defeated in the end by Trump, the moment that Cruz about attacked Trump on him funding liberals and Trump said "I funded you", topped by Trump taunting Cruz " go ahead, don't be nervous, go ahead" and Cruz blowing it so much the moderator said "you had your chance"

    Rubio won the debate since he was the most effective attacker on Trump, Trump wasn't far behind in appearing more reasonable than others and by beating Cruz in the end.
    Kasich too was very good on domestic affairs, but regime change in N.Korea makes people remember iraq.
    Carson really wants attention.

    Rubio 7/10
    Trump 6/10
    Kasich 5/10
    Cruz 4/10
    Carson 3/10

    One thing that I saw was Rubio moving to the right, pitching about this whole election being about conservatism, clearly he's after Cruz voters.
    I also hate the screaming Rubio girl.
  • Options

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    Seconded - thank you Roger for a fascinating overview and carefully thought through recommendations - of the ones I've seen I'd agree with pretty much all of them - and like you I suspect Rylance's brilliant, but understated, performance will be overlooked.....
    EDIT - by the way, OGH may have unintentionally outed Roger by giving his full name - of course he may be entirely happy with this, but if unintentional, may be worth amending before the UK wakes up. Not all of Roger's tips are quite as reliable as his Oscar ones..... ;-)
  • Options
    RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737
    It was great following the debate dubbed in Spanish, and thanks to Speedy for the customary concise precis.

    It seems from the body language that everyone is ready to accept the inevitable. How could it be otherwise against such a tornado, tearing across the political landscape?
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    edited February 2016
    RodCrosby said:

    It was great following the debate dubbed in Spanish, and thanks to Speedy for the customary concise precis.

    It seems from the body language that everyone is ready to accept the inevitable. How could it be otherwise against such a tornado, tearing across the political landscape?

    When you throw the kitchen sink and it doesn't do much and in fact beating up one of the two throwing the kitchen sinks then you come out ok.

    Rubio did win (just), Trump didn't lose, but Cruz lost.

    The media will crown Rubio emperor or something for this as usual, but I don't think it alters the race as Trump didn't lose, it's up the the pollsters of course to determine it, but it's clear that Cruz is finished.

    You can sum the debate as "too little too late".
    Goodnight.
  • Options
    Morning all.

    Many thanks Roger, for the Oscar's round-up – glad to see the return of an old PB favourite.
  • Options
    JohnLoonyJohnLoony Posts: 1,790
    I saw "The Revenant" the other day, and I think it deserves the Oscars for Best Actor (Leo), Cinematography, Original Music, but I'm not sure about Best Film. It was a bit too long, and I was confused for the first substantial chunk of the film because there wasn't enough exposition in telling us When (19th century, but early? mid? late?), Where (Rocky Mountains, but USA or Canada?), What (what were they doing?) and Who (who were they anyway?). At first they were a bit mumbling and talking in bumpkin accents, so I was worried that it might be like Brokeback Mountain (which I needed subtitles to watch). It wasn't until I got home and looked it up on Wikipedia that I discovered it was based on a real incident in 1823.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130
    On topic: hard not to agree with most of Roger's picks. On Best Supporting Actor, Mark Rylance was superb, but I can't imagine his "let's talk to ISIS" comments will have gone down well with the Oscar electorate, so I think that Stallone will get the nod.

    I disagree on Best Supporting Actress - can't see past Kate Winslet in Steve Jobs.

    On Costume Design, I think the wife's good buddy Sandy Powell (she was Sandy's guest at the Oscar's a few years back) may well lose out by having two films nominated (Cinderella and Carol), as she did in the BAFTAs (again to Mad Max's "the bag lady", as Stephen Fry ungallantly called Jenny Beavan). But get yourself an Oscar frock, Jenny!

    On Makeup, I thought that Black Mass was cruelly overlooked for a nomination - their transformation of Johnny Depp was spectacular. In its absence, I'll agree with Roger.

    On Visual Effects, I think that the movie money machine that is the Star Wars franchise may well get the nod. But I loved Ex Machina (although I thought the script missed the opportunity for a great twist!).
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,892
    edited February 2016

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    Seconded - thank you Roger for a fascinating overview and carefully thought through recommendations - of the ones I've seen I'd agree with pretty much all of them - and like you I suspect Rylance's brilliant, but understated, performance will be overlooked.....
    EDIT - by the way, OGH may have unintentionally outed Roger by giving his full name - of course he may be entirely happy with this, but if unintentional, may be worth amending before the UK wakes up. Not all of Roger's tips are quite as reliable as his Oscar ones..... ;-)

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    Seconded - thank you Roger for a fascinating overview and carefully thought through recommendations - of the ones I've seen I'd agree with pretty much all of them - and like you I suspect Rylance's brilliant, but understated, performance will be overlooked.....
    Thanks Carlotta and thanks again for your second post further down! I'll just have to hope poster interest in film means they don't get to the end! I suspect you're right about Rylance particularly after reading Marquee's comments. I didn't know about his ISIS comment.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,027
    Haven’t seen all of them by any means, by I thought Alicia Viklander was excellent in the Danish Girl.

    I liked Shaun the Sheep but I would think it too “British” for American voters.
  • Options
    Thanks roger our oscar expert. Can we avoid posts about europe this morning please?
  • Options



    I disagree on Best Supporting Actress - can't see past Kate Winslet in Steve Jobs.

    I enjoyed Winslett in Steve Jobs - but felt as if her accent sort of came & went - or was that intentional with it softening over time?

    I loved the insight into Apple that because Jobs REALLY didn't want anyone to tamper with his machines they didn't have the tools to get into the Mac when it had problems at its launch - a simple screw driver wouldn't do!

    The Revenant was beautifully filmed and Leonardo's performance a tour de force - if he wins it will also be 'most grunts per oscar' - but I did feel it could have benefitted from being shorter.

    Inside Out brilliant - not only beautifully done but wonderfully written and very clever.....
  • Options
    As if LEAVE coudn't get any worse......

    Sky News understands senior figures in UKIP have discussed trying to suspend the party's only MP over his backing for a rival leave the EU group.

    Douglas Carswell supports Vote Leave, which is also backed by six Conservative cabinet rebels, but Nigel Farage has thrown his weight behind Leave.EU and its umbrella group offshoot Grassroots Out (GO).


    http://news.sky.com/story/1648918/ukip-infighting-over-rival-eu-leave-campaigns
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130
    edited February 2016

    As if LEAVE coudn't get any worse......

    Sky News understands senior figures in UKIP have discussed trying to suspend the party's only MP over his backing for a rival leave the EU group.

    Douglas Carswell supports Vote Leave, which is also backed by six Conservative cabinet rebels, but Nigel Farage has thrown his weight behind Leave.EU and its umbrella group offshoot Grassroots Out (GO).


    http://news.sky.com/story/1648918/ukip-infighting-over-rival-eu-leave-campaigns

    Deleted in deference to Mods request
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,892

    On topic: hard not to agree with most of Roger's picks. On Best Supporting Actor, Mark Rylance was superb, but I can't imagine his "let's talk to ISIS" comments will have gone down well with the Oscar electorate, so I think that Stallone will get the nod.

    I disagree on Best Supporting Actress - can't see past Kate Winslet in Steve Jobs.

    On Costume Design, I think the wife's good buddy Sandy Powell (she was Sandy's guest at the Oscar's a few years back) may well lose out by having two films nominated (Cinderella and Carol), as she did in the BAFTAs (again to Mad Max's "the bag lady", as Stephen Fry ungallantly called Jenny Beavan). But get yourself an Oscar frock, Jenny!

    On Makeup, I thought that Black Mass was cruelly overlooked for a nomination - their transformation of Johnny Depp was spectacular. In its absence, I'll agree with Roger.

    On Visual Effects, I think that the movie money machine that is the Star Wars franchise may well get the nod. But I loved Ex Machina (although I thought the script missed the opportunity for a great twist!).

    MM. Thanks for the inside knowledge. I think you're more likely to be right than me on those you've mentioned except for Kate Winslet. Despite her Bafta and typically fine perfmorance. her part just wasn't as big or complex as Rooney Mara's or even Alicia Viklander's. I didn't know about Rylance's ISIS comment and I think he had a hill to climb anyway but if he doesn't get anything Bridge of Spies walks away with nothing which would be a double injustice. It was a pity no PB involvement this year. Maybe next?
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,892
    edited February 2016

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    Thanks for that but posters usually talk abour what they're interested in whatever the header. The odds are ridiculously short on some but that's what happens when each is a choice of about five and the Oscars come at the end of the awards season.

    I went into a bookmakers and asked him to put £10 on each of my 20 picks as I always do and as he was going through them he said "You surely don't wan't me to put it on this-it's 100/1 on! I didn't know which film he was talking about because I deliberately don't look at the odds .
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited February 2016
    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130



    I disagree on Best Supporting Actress - can't see past Kate Winslet in Steve Jobs.

    I enjoyed Winslett in Steve Jobs - but felt as if her accent sort of came & went - or was that intentional with it softening over time?
    If her performance was so subtle that her accent changed over time, that would be quite an acting feat, given that the film was very likely shot out of sequence!
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130
    Roger said:

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    Thanks for that but posters usually talk abour what they're interested in whatever the header. The odds are ridiculously short on some but that's what happens when each is a choice of about five and the Oscars come at the end of the awards season.

    I went into a bookmakers and asked him to put £10 on each of my 20 picks as I always do and as he was going through them he said "You surely don't wan't me to put it on this-it's 100/1 on! I didn't know which film he was talking about because I deliberately don't look at the odds .
    The 1/100 was probably di Caprio. But it could have been Inside Out. If you got better odds-on either one, you did well!
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,130

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    You say all that - but it is based on a true story. Maybe it is partly that he was such a medical marvel that has kept the story alive for nearly 200 years...? He certainly should have died several times over.

    It is one of my bug-bears though about modern "action" films - the sheer implausibility of the way people get slammed into unyielding objects and just never end up with a broken back. Or even concussion.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,343
    Thanks for this Roger. One of the few threads in a year I can get my wife to read as she always sits up for the Oscars.

    I thought the Big Short was truly excellent and would well deserve the best film although I agree with SeanT that Inside Out was sadly overlooked. The Revenant too long and shapeless for me but I do feel that Di Caprio has been unfairly overlooked so many times his win is inevitable.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    edited February 2016
    There is an brief item in today's Time Magazine with some rather less usual Oscar bets available

    http://time.com/money/4238000/weird-oscar-bets-academy-awards/
    For example, with odds of 21:1, you can potentially make money off an Oscar victor falling on stage while receiving their award.
    etc

  • Options



    I disagree on Best Supporting Actress - can't see past Kate Winslet in Steve Jobs.

    I enjoyed Winslett in Steve Jobs - but felt as if her accent sort of came & went - or was that intentional with it softening over time?
    If her performance was so subtle that her accent changed over time, that would be quite an acting feat, given that the film was very likely shot out of sequence!
    The trouble was I felt it became stronger in the later sequences.....a minor detail....
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,343

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    You say all that - but it is based on a true story. Maybe it is partly that he was such a medical marvel that has kept the story alive for nearly 200 years...? He certainly should have died several times over.

    It is one of my bug-bears though about modern "action" films - the sheer implausibility of the way people get slammed into unyielding objects and just never end up with a broken back. Or even concussion.
    Or ,even severe bruising and stiffness which affects their movement for the rest of the film. In contrast your average professional footballer seems pole axed by a passing zephyr, especially in the box. Although in fairness their recovery time is pretty remarkable too!
  • Options
    TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 41,370
    Roger said:

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    Seconded - thank you Roger for a fascinating overview and carefully thought through recommendations - of the ones I've seen I'd agree with pretty much all of them - and like you I suspect Rylance's brilliant, but understated, performance will be overlooked.....
    EDIT - by the way, OGH may have unintentionally outed Roger by giving his full name - of course he may be entirely happy with this, but if unintentional, may be worth amending before the UK wakes up. Not all of Roger's tips are quite as reliable as his Oscar ones..... ;-)

    Crazy idea to launch Roger's Oscars thread immediately before tonight's GOP TV debate started.
    I hope nevertheless it receives the attention it deserves tomorrow or that OGH relaunches it.
    There aren't many non-political betting fests on PB.com ....... SPOTY, Eurovision and yes, The Oscars. It would be a a shame if Roger's picks didn't get a decent airing.

    Seconded - thank you Roger for a fascinating overview and carefully thought through recommendations - of the ones I've seen I'd agree with pretty much all of them - and like you I suspect Rylance's brilliant, but understated, performance will be overlooked.....
    Thanks Carlotta and thanks again for your second post further down! I'll just have to hope poster interest in film means they don't get to the end! I suspect you're right about Rylance particularly after reading Marquee's comments. I didn't know about his ISIS comment.
    Thanks Roger for this; v interesting. Not seen The Revenant but seems worthy and long, both elements designed to keep me away but I'm sure I'm missing out.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,892
    edited February 2016

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    LOL! He'll just have to hope all those in the Academy who get a vote aren't doctors!

    I agree completely with the cerebral way you think the performance should be judged and sometimes that works but at others a film or performance just stay in your head for days weeks or months after you've seen the film for no reason but force of personality. And I think this was an example of that. I didn't think he was nearly as commanding or original as he was in the Wolf of Wall Street for example but when you think of the film his presence as much as the lanscape is all over it.
  • Options

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    My thoughts exactly, Dr! I did a 4 days survival course a while back- just for fun, as you do, and that was horrendous. Once your're cold and wet, you're in trouble, even in Springtime in the Peak District, let alone in the Rockys, with snow on the ground and after being chewed on by a Grizzly! I hope Dicaprio gets it, though, I think he deserved one for The Departed, and he is a fine actor.

    Still, thanks a lot for this Roger, it's great to get such an informed view.
  • Options
    IndigoIndigo Posts: 9,966
    TOPPING said:

    Thanks Roger for this; v interesting. Not seen The Revenant but seems worthy and long, both elements designed to keep me away but I'm sure I'm missing out.

    I haven't seen it either, but the hoopla around it has shades of another dark western that got a good oscar haul a while ago, Clint Eastwood's Unforgiven.

  • Options
    DavidL said:

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    You say all that - but it is based on a true story. Maybe it is partly that he was such a medical marvel that has kept the story alive for nearly 200 years...? He certainly should have died several times over.

    It is one of my bug-bears though about modern "action" films - the sheer implausibility of the way people get slammed into unyielding objects and just never end up with a broken back. Or even concussion.
    Or ,even severe bruising and stiffness which affects their movement for the rest of the film. In contrast your average professional footballer seems pole axed by a passing zephyr, especially in the box. Although in fairness their recovery time is pretty remarkable too!
    They didn't have the magic sponge in the old West...
  • Options
    I imagine this has already been linked to, but if not it's well worth a read:

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/26/irrational-unhinged-gullible-many-who-want-britain-out-of-europe-deserve-listened?CMP=share_btn_tw

    I'd say he's spot on. Articles like this are why the Guardian remains an important source, despite its general annoyingness.
  • Options

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    You say all that - but it is based on a true story. Maybe it is partly that he was such a medical marvel that has kept the story alive for nearly 200 years...? He certainly should have died several times over.

    It is one of my bug-bears though about modern "action" films - the sheer implausibility of the way people get slammed into unyielding objects and just never end up with a broken back. Or even concussion.
    One of the things I have to keep in mind when watching action films is "IT'S NOT A DOCUMENTARY!" I'm forever rolling my eyes, before telling the Mrs that Vin Diesel wouldn't survive being blown up and landing on the windscreen of a speeding supercar, or that getting knocked unconscious is a very bad thing indeed.
  • Options
    FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    Good work Roger! Enjoyed that.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,942
    Google trends for GOP candidates over last week:
    https://trends.google.com/trends/story/US_cu_pF04D1MBAADP0M_en
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    Just watched QT, we all know how dreadful Abbott is but if Truss is the best the tories can put forward our politics is at an all time though. Stuffed dummies parrotting rehearsed lines.

    I like that vicar.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985

    Just watched QT, we all know how dreadful Abbott is but if Truss is the best the tories can put forward our politics is at an all time though. Stuffed dummies parrotting rehearsed lines.

    I like that vicar.

    Truss is absolutely dreadful. I cannot forget (or forgive) that awful conference speech.
  • Options
    dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,288
    Saw Spotlight, very good film.
  • Options
    Thanks Roger.
    Have had a punt on some of your picks.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    You say all that - but it is based on a true story. Maybe it is partly that he was such a medical marvel that has kept the story alive for nearly 200 years...? He certainly should have died several times over.

    It is one of my bug-bears though about modern "action" films - the sheer implausibility of the way people get slammed into unyielding objects and just never end up with a broken back. Or even concussion.
    The story on which it was based actually took place in summer, and did not involve native americans or a revenge expedition after getting back to the fort.

    I accept though that life can sometimes be implausible, just look at the life story of Captain Winkle Brown who died earlier in the week:

    http://m.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/eric-winkle-brown-s-death-prompts-calls-for-memorial-1-4036887

    A story too unreal to be true.
  • Options
    runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    Stuffed dummies parrotting rehearsed lines.

    Well the second part of that starts at the very top
  • Options
    dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,288
    Indigo said:

    There is an brief item in today's Time Magazine with some rather less usual Oscar bets available

    http://time.com/money/4238000/weird-oscar-bets-academy-awards/

    For example, with odds of 21:1, you can potentially make money off an Oscar victor falling on stage while receiving their award.
    etc



    They had a good day, yesterday claiming that Evelyn Waugh as one of the best selling female writers.
  • Options
    One of my oldest friends produced Lex Machina. We met at my grammar school. Toby Young was in the year below. That school and what it gave to me is why I can't argue against the grammar school principle. I have been very, very lucky. Great parents, last grammar school in ILEA, free university education, the time to live abroad without worrying about the future, an understanding welfare system when I was unemployed, affordable London house prices, rational enemies of the state, chance meetings and good friends. I worked hard too and took my opportunities, but working class kids today in this globalised world - even middle class kids like mine - have it so much harder.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    RobD said:

    Just watched QT, we all know how dreadful Abbott is but if Truss is the best the tories can put forward our politics is at an all time though. Stuffed dummies parrotting rehearsed lines.

    I like that vicar.

    Truss is absolutely dreadful. I cannot forget (or forgive) that awful conference speech.
    Let's put aside parties, look at Abbott and Truss, the highest profile political panel show of the week and that's what we see. We have to choose between these idiots.
  • Options
    DavidLDavidL Posts: 51,343
    Roger said:

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    LOL! He'll just have to hope all those in the Academy who get a vote aren't doctors!

    I agree completely with the cerebral way you think the performance should be judged and sometimes that works but at others a film or performance just stay in your head for days weeks or months after you've seen the film for no reason but force of personality. And I think this was an example of that. I didn't think he was nearly as commanding or original as he was in the Wolf of Wall Street for example but when you think of the film his presence as much as the lanscape is all over it.
    Wolf of Wall Street was a magnificent performance. Different class altogether from this.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    One of my oldest friends produced Lex Machina. We met at my grammar school. Toby Young was in the year below. That school and what it gave to me is why I can't argue against the grammar school principle. I have been very, very lucky. Great parents, last grammar school in ILEA, free university education, the time to live abroad without worrying about the future, an understanding welfare system when I was unemployed, affordable London house prices, rational enemies of the state, chance meetings and good friends. I worked hard too and took my opportunities, but working class kids today in this globalised world - even middle class kids like mine - have it so much harder.

    Well said, as a Grammar School boy I agree that they massively help working class kids. We should be opening them in Moss Side and Whitechapel.
  • Options
    Agree that Mark Rylance was superb in Bridge of Spies. So still. He's a luvvie and a bit of a tit in real life, but he is a peerless actor. I hope he wins.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Sky
    Ringleaders of the #Rotherham sex abuse scandal could lose their #UK citizenship https://t.co/0BuPtl5MhY https://t.co/vCBCZhJOI8
  • Options
    WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838
    Thanks Roger. The Oscars are not my thing but this was an entertaining breakfast read.

    Thanks Speedy for the GOP debate live report (again). I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    @speedy Some great laughs in your running commentary.

    Still chuckling over Carsons plea for someone to attack him. And Trump's ties :smiley:
    Wanderer said:

    Thanks Roger. The Oscars are not my thing but this was an entertaining breakfast read.

    Thanks Speedy for the GOP debate live report (again). I salute your courage, your strength, your indefatigability.

  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,897
    DavidL said:

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    You say all that - but it is based on a true story. Maybe it is partly that he was such a medical marvel that has kept the story alive for nearly 200 years...? He certainly should have died several times over.

    It is one of my bug-bears though about modern "action" films - the sheer implausibility of the way people get slammed into unyielding objects and just never end up with a broken back. Or even concussion.
    Or ,even severe bruising and stiffness which affects their movement for the rest of the film. In contrast your average professional footballer seems pole axed by a passing zephyr, especially in the box. Although in fairness their recovery time is pretty remarkable too!
    I can think of a modern action movie where the hero clearly responds as though bruised and hurt by punishment received, having to stop and gather themselves, take in so E deep breaths, cringe in pain and even pass out. It was Godzilla in Godzilla.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,942
    Trump seemed very calm compared to his South Carolina debate judging by the newsclips. Has a definite frontrunner air about him, took less risks tonight and got almost half the total speaking time !
    CNN seem to judge a points win for Rubio, but no knock out blows tonight.
  • Options
    WandererWanderer Posts: 3,838

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    You say all that - but it is based on a true story. Maybe it is partly that he was such a medical marvel that has kept the story alive for nearly 200 years...? He certainly should have died several times over.

    It is one of my bug-bears though about modern "action" films - the sheer implausibility of the way people get slammed into unyielding objects and just never end up with a broken back. Or even concussion.
    One of the things I have to keep in mind when watching action films is "IT'S NOT A DOCUMENTARY!" I'm forever rolling my eyes, before telling the Mrs that Vin Diesel wouldn't survive being blown up and landing on the windscreen of a speeding supercar, or that getting knocked unconscious is a very bad thing indeed.
    What jars with me in action films as that at some point people do get killed and it's not obvious why this particular trauma is fatal when others weren't. Bullet through the forehead? Hey, it's just one bullet, right? Put your hand over the exit wound and blink a few times. No biggie.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,897

    Thanks Roger. I have had a modest punt on a couple of these.

    I suppose the deciding factor is how well the Revenant does, as Oscars do seem highly clumped together rather than shared across several worthy contenders.

    The Revenant did cover the brutality and barbarity of the American west quite well, and the cinematography was tremendous, but it is far from Leo's best performance. Acting is about making the unreal plausible, and at several parts I thought Leo would be dead. He would have died of exposure in that icy river, his clothes would have been too waterlogged to move in afterwards, the throat wound would have been fatal and not healed so fast. The bearskin that he carried would have weighed over 100lb and couldn't have been worn by an injured man with a makeshift ankle support and crutch etc etc. The implausibilities just grated too much for my medical eyes!

    You say all that - but it is based on a true story. Maybe it is partly that he was such a medical marvel that has kept the story alive for nearly 200 years...? He certainly should have died several times over.

    It is one of my bug-bears though about modern "action" films - the sheer implausibility of the way people get slammed into unyielding objects and just never end up with a broken back. Or even concussion.
    One of the things I have to keep in mind when watching action films is "IT'S NOT A DOCUMENTARY!" I'm forever rolling my eyes, before telling the Mrs that Vin Diesel wouldn't survive being blown up and landing on the windscreen of a speeding supercar, or that getting knocked unconscious is a very bad thing indeed.
    I have no problem so long as the film is consistent. If you are going for ridiculous implausible action and Unsurvivable stunts, make sure if I'm supposed to suddenly believe a stunt has hurt them it is clearly worse than anything else seen, so that in movie it makes sense why only now are they hurt.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,942
    Stephens-Davidowitz
    @seththoughts

    I know, we're all immune to "Trump is going to collapse" arguments. But he has dropped big-time in markets tonight. This was a bad night.
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,942
    Stephens-Davidowitz ‏@seththoughts 4h4 hours ago Manhattan, NY

    @LJZigerell http://predictwise.com From 75 % to 70 %.

    LOL
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985

    RobD said:

    Just watched QT, we all know how dreadful Abbott is but if Truss is the best the tories can put forward our politics is at an all time though. Stuffed dummies parrotting rehearsed lines.

    I like that vicar.

    Truss is absolutely dreadful. I cannot forget (or forgive) that awful conference speech.
    Let's put aside parties, look at Abbott and Truss, the highest profile political panel show of the week and that's what we see. We have to choose between these idiots.
    The more discerning viewer tunes into This Week ;)
  • Options
    Good morning, everyone.

    Thanks to Mr. Roger for his comprehensive Oscars cogitations. Not a film goer, so I might browse the market and see if any odds seem longer than they should.
  • Options
    CD13CD13 Posts: 6,351
    edited February 2016
    To be fair to the films, they do tend to show more realistic damage now, even if they recover from them easily. I remember the 1950s cowboy films. A gunfight in the saloon, the man is shot three times at close range with a 45 calibre pistol and slumps to the ground without a mark on him. His clean shirt unmarked and his noble face clean-shaven despite three weeks on the range.

    Obviously killed by the noise, or else a sudden and massive heart attack.

    I blame the diet.
  • Options
    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Just watched QT, we all know how dreadful Abbott is but if Truss is the best the tories can put forward our politics is at an all time though. Stuffed dummies parrotting rehearsed lines.

    I like that vicar.

    Truss is absolutely dreadful. I cannot forget (or forgive) that awful conference speech.
    Let's put aside parties, look at Abbott and Truss, the highest profile political panel show of the week and that's what we see. We have to choose between these idiots.
    The more discerning viewer tunes into This Week ;)
    Indeed - always avoid QT but tune into This Week - though unfortunately Lammy isn't the brightest button in the drawer. (Nice, but dim.) Portillo often is the voice of reason. Brillo does a good job of actually asking pertinent questions, which is something you never get with the likes of Dimblebore or Marr.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    RobD said:

    The more discerning viewer tunes into This Week ;)

    For readers of this blog below the age of 50, "tunes into" refers to the archaic practise of selecting programmes on the wireless by adjusting a large tuning knob on the fascia of the instrument.
This discussion has been closed.