Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Corbyn’s reshuffle – the aftermath with more resignations e

1246

Comments

  • Options

    It would indeed have been a mistake. I can't recall recommending offering a job to any candidate who wasn't prepared to draw a line in the sand somewhere.

    Presumably at the point where the reputational damage wasn't matched by the fees?
  • Options
    #DrummondPuddleWatch
  • Options
    JBriskinJBriskin Posts: 2,380
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091

    There's some epic YouGov polling for the The Times on the EU ref. 22k sample size, Sep to Dec

    By party voters

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYC2YIyWEAADPO1.png

    By region

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYC2efgWEAAvAHh.png

    By qualifications

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYC2jhNWQAEa8KS.png

    By social class

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYC2lr-WkAAjr5S.png

    By newspaper readers

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CYC2nyrWkAABYxt.png

    That would surely be the nightmare result for the Tories.

    A narrow IN result overall, but the majority of Tory voters (and the overwhelming majority of Tory members) going OUT. There would be a strong rationale then for the Tories getting a diehard Outer as next leader and going for a "one more heave" strategy and banging on about Europe and another referendum.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,061
    Danny565 said:

    David Skelton
    .@Dannythefink often reminds us most people don't obsess about politics. Lab reshuffle only trending 19th in UK atm: https://t.co/gI1eHMzdEt

    It is the most read story on BBC, though.

    EDIT: Or atleast it was about half an hour ago, been knocked off by a vitally important story about Celebrity Big Brother now.
    And more to the point, everyone knows most peopel don't obsess about politics, even pundits, it's just not necessary to include it as a caveat on every breathless piece about politics. And that those though who do obsess over it overstate their own influence on or representation of the wider electorate, what the Westminster bubble and its fans obsess over will cumulatively have an impact of some kind.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,906
    edited January 2016
    Jonathan said:

    Roger said:


    I can't think of any national or international event however damaging to the Conservatives that would now benefit Labour. The public would just find a new alternative like they did with the SDP. Cameron must be the luckiest leader in history

    Sigh. An event that causes Corbyn and/or McDonnell to resign voluntarily might just have some benefit.
    If media time is anything to go by the party are being run by a small clique of Abbott Livingstone Corbyn and McDonnell. I heard livingstone claim that Oldham with the 'best result in a century' proved how popular Corbyn was. A ridiculous claim but short of a humiliating defeat at several others I can't see why either of them would resign
  • Options
    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Roger said:


    I can't think of any national or international event however damaging to the Conservatives that would now benefit Labour. The public would just find a new alternative like they did with the SDP. Cameron must be the luckiest leader in history

    Sigh. An event that causes Corbyn and/or McDonnell to resign voluntarily might just have some benefit.
    If media time is anything to go by the party are being run by a small clique of Abbott Livingstone Corbyn and McDonnell. I heard livingstone claim that Oldham with the 'best result in a century' proved how popular Corbyn was. A ridiculous claim but short of a humiliating defeat at another one I can't see why they would resign
    The Labour have been riven mad by David Cameron electoral appeal.

    Just imagine how bad it will get when George Osborne wins a landslide in 2020.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    It would indeed have been a mistake. I can't recall recommending offering a job to any candidate who wasn't prepared to draw a line in the sand somewhere.

    Presumably at the point where the reputational damage wasn't matched by the fees?
    That would have been an enterprising answer. Such candidates would need careful watching later, mind.
  • Options

    It would indeed have been a mistake. I can't recall recommending offering a job to any candidate who wasn't prepared to draw a line in the sand somewhere.

    Presumably at the point where the reputational damage wasn't matched by the fees?
    That would have been an enterprising answer. Such candidates would need careful watching later, mind.
    Absolutely. You wouldn't want them to be poached by a rival firm because you hadn't promoted them fast enough.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    JBriskin said:
    @dylsharpe: Shadow Minister: "resignation letter done. Get me Millbank politics desk"
    SpAd: "Err, best wait til everyone's stopped watching the puddle"
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422

    Wanderer said:

    kle4 said:

    ...he will be constantly undermined regardless, so he might as well go as extreme as he can in getting a shadow cabinet that backs him, so no one there is constantly seen as a potential rival or might resign at any moment.

    He is conducting a very long-term experiment to find out at what point Burnham will resign.
    For quite a few years I used to conduct some of my firm's interviews for graduate recruitment. In earlier years I liked to ask candidates whether there were any clients for whom they would refuse to act on ethical grounds. I would tempt them with increasingly fraught examples: tobacco companies; sub-prime lenders; life sciences firms; neo-Nazi organisations. Of course, I was less interested in their answer and more interested in their reasoning.

    In later years I had to abandon this question because it appears that there are no organisations that young graduates nowadays would refuse to act for.

    For the same reason, I fear that any such very long-term experiment may be wasted on Andy Burnham.
    It may be that it is not so much that graduates are more amoral than in the past as that they (perhaps mistakenly) are more inclined to think your firm is, and they are saying what they think you want to hear.
    It would indeed have been a mistake. I can't recall recommending offering a job to any candidate who wasn't prepared to draw a line in the sand somewhere.
    I watched Bridge of Spies on a flight recently. I tend to the Tom Hanks character's position that anyone ought to be entitled to legal representation. Indeed, I don't think that a law firm which is competent to act ought to be able to turn down a client on ethical grounds.
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    edited January 2016
    Presumably at the point where the reputational damage wasn't matched by the fees?

    What's interesting is that The Meeks list does not include the serial rapists, murderers, and drug lords that lawyers defend all the time.

    So defending Sutcliffe the sequel is no problem.

    Defending a member of Britain First with no criminal record? No way, I have some standards.

    That's Lawyers for you.
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,631
    This is the kind of stuff that gets people's backs up:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/12084785/Exams-to-be-taken-earlier-in-the-day-to-fit-around-Ramadan-exam-boards-say.html

    It's a joke, how about Muslims integrate into our way of life rather than inconvenience millions of non-Muslim schoolchildren. If living here is incompatible with their religion, well they know where the door is.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    taffys said:

    Presumably at the point where the reputational damage wasn't matched by the fees?

    What's interesting is that The Meeks list does not include the serial rapists, murderers, and drug lords that lawyers defend all the time.

    So defending Sutcliffe the sequel is no problem.

    Defending a member of Britain First with no criminal record? No way, I have some standards.

    That's Lawyers for you.

    There are different considerations for criminal lawyers from commercial lawyers, really.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DPJHodges: While focus is on P McFadden sacking, worth remembering Maria Eagle was sacked for crime of accurately articulating official Labour policy.
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 42,125

    Well colour me stunned

    Nigel Farage's 'Assassination' Claims Rubbished By Mechanics Who Fixed His 'Sabotaged' Volvo

    http://huff.to/1TEndSH

    Some years ago I was driving on the M25 at full motorway speed in the fast lane, in quite heavy traffic, when the car started shuddering and making a most alarming noise. I managed to pull in safely to the hard shoulder, looked at the service booklet, and discovered that there was a BMW garage close to the next turn off. So I gently proceeded there, and asked them if they could take a look. I had to wait a bit, because they were busy, but eventually they got round to looking at the car.

    All four wheels were loose. I had had the car serviced a couple of days earlier and the garage had failed to tighten the nuts. I think I was quite lucky to survive.
    I remember when I was a youngster, the wheel (for the same reason) actually fell off my mothers car as she was taking me out for the day. I was for some reason looking out of the back of the car when it happened, and saw the wheel roll away behind us. On just 3 wheels we somehow managed to avoid probably 20 cars before crashing into the verge.

    I think it was the EU overlords trying to knock my mum off.

    My other memory from that day, was a nice old lady came out and gave us ferrero rocher. From a poor family, had never had ferrero rocher before.
    I once had the steering wheel come off as I came to a roundabout , that was fun. Worst ever was bonnet opening and wrapping itself over windscreen , luckily only doing 40-50 but scary till I realised why everything had gone white and managed to stop safely.
  • Options
    oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,831
    MaxPB said:

    This is the kind of stuff that gets people's backs up:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/12084785/Exams-to-be-taken-earlier-in-the-day-to-fit-around-Ramadan-exam-boards-say.html

    It's a joke, how about Muslims integrate into our way of life rather than inconvenience millions of non-Muslim schoolchildren. If living here is incompatible with their religion, well they know where the door is.

    School students are not required to fast if it gets in the way of their education. Claiming otherwise is misrepresenting mainstream teaching on the matter.

    Years ago when my mother was a secondary school bursar, she found that the tuck shop takings went up during Ramadan - due to the Muslim kids increasing their Mars Bar intake!
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited January 2016

    David Skelton
    .@Dannythefink often reminds us most people don't obsess about politics. Lab reshuffle only trending 19th in UK atm: https://t.co/gI1eHMzdEt

    On the other hand about a third of people don't bother to vote in any form of election these days.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    "Exams to be taken earlier in the day to fit around Ramadan, exam boards say

    The announcement follows comments by the children's commissioner, who said the exams time table could be delayed to accommodate Muslim pupils"


    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/12084785/Exams-to-be-taken-earlier-in-the-day-to-fit-around-Ramadan-exam-boards-say.html
  • Options
    JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,215

    Crossing the floor would be a Top Trumps winner. Unlikely, but then everyday in Corbynistaland brings new wonders.

    kle4 said:

    I'm feeling deprived now. No resignations in over an hour :neutral:

    I would expect the next batch to come just before 5pm - ready for PM and the evening news shows
    If they are going to do it, I hope they try to top each other with bitter accusations or mode of resignation. Topping resigning on air may be tough.
    The ultimate would be an MP in a super-marginal crossing the floor and forcing a ratifying by-election as a Tory.

    This is not something I am predicting.
    But keep an eye on John Woodcock (I suspect you already are) who and whose constituency fits that perfectly.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,014
    Mr. Max, it's also worth noting those same Muslims will one day have jobs and have to get on with life.

    And that children are exempt from fasting [not sure how 'child' is defined in Islamic rules, though].
  • Options
    JonathanDJonathanD Posts: 2,400
    edited January 2016

    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Roger said:


    I can't think of any national or international event however damaging to the Conservatives that would now benefit Labour. The public would just find a new alternative like they did with the SDP. Cameron must be the luckiest leader in history

    Sigh. An event that causes Corbyn and/or McDonnell to resign voluntarily might just have some benefit.
    If media time is anything to go by the party are being run by a small clique of Abbott Livingstone Corbyn and McDonnell. I heard livingstone claim that Oldham with the 'best result in a century' proved how popular Corbyn was. A ridiculous claim but short of a humiliating defeat at another one I can't see why they would resign
    The Labour have been riven mad by David Cameron electoral appeal.

    Just imagine how bad it will get when George Osborne wins a landslide in 2020.

    It would be ironic if Cameron, the second best Tory leader in 60 years, could only achieve a hung parliament and narrow majority, but Osborne, who lacks most of Cameron's electability and appeal, achieved a Blair-esque majority.
  • Options
    JohnO said:

    Crossing the floor would be a Top Trumps winner. Unlikely, but then everyday in Corbynistaland brings new wonders.

    kle4 said:

    I'm feeling deprived now. No resignations in over an hour :neutral:

    I would expect the next batch to come just before 5pm - ready for PM and the evening news shows
    If they are going to do it, I hope they try to top each other with bitter accusations or mode of resignation. Topping resigning on air may be tough.
    The ultimate would be an MP in a super-marginal crossing the floor and forcing a ratifying by-election as a Tory.

    This is not something I am predicting.
    But keep an eye on John Woodcock (I suspect you already are) who and whose constituency fits that perfectly.
    He won't go, he was Liz Kendall's campaign manager, it would bring great joy to the Corbynites.


    I suspect he'll trigger a by election over Trident and stand as an Independent Labour candidate
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    O/T:

    Let's not talk about...

    "Teenage victim of Cologne 'African and Arab' sex mob reveals how she and her friends were surrounded by 30 men and groped as officials admit the German city is now a 'no-go' area for women"

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html
  • Options
    Wow, Hashim Amla has quit as Saffers captain
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    There are different considerations for criminal lawyers from commercial lawyers, really.

    I'm sure you're right, but I guess there must be firms who specialise in representing 'bad boy' clients like the ones you mention.
  • Options
    Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Amla resigns as captain - big news that.
  • Options

    Amla resigns as captain - big news that.

    Normally it is England captains who resign after a series against the Saffers. Hussain, Vaughan, and Strauss
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    malcolmg said:

    Well colour me stunned

    Nigel Farage's 'Assassination' Claims Rubbished By Mechanics Who Fixed His 'Sabotaged' Volvo

    http://huff.to/1TEndSH

    Some years ago I was driving on the M25 at full motorway speed in the fast lane, in quite heavy traffic, when the car started shuddering and making a most alarming noise. I managed to pull in safely to the hard shoulder, looked at the service booklet, and discovered that there was a BMW garage close to the next turn off. So I gently proceeded there, and asked them if they could take a look. I had to wait a bit, because they were busy, but eventually they got round to looking at the car.

    All four wheels were loose. I had had the car serviced a couple of days earlier and the garage had failed to tighten the nuts. I think I was quite lucky to survive.
    I remember when I was a youngster, the wheel (for the same reason) actually fell off my mothers car as she was taking me out for the day. I was for some reason looking out of the back of the car when it happened, and saw the wheel roll away behind us. On just 3 wheels we somehow managed to avoid probably 20 cars before crashing into the verge.

    I think it was the EU overlords trying to knock my mum off.

    My other memory from that day, was a nice old lady came out and gave us ferrero rocher. From a poor family, had never had ferrero rocher before.
    I once had the steering wheel come off as I came to a roundabout , that was fun. Worst ever was bonnet opening and wrapping itself over windscreen , luckily only doing 40-50 but scary till I realised why everything had gone white and managed to stop safely.
    I once discovered an apparently common fault on my then Vauxhall Nova whereby releasing the handbrake didn't fully disengage the actual brake, when coming up to a roundabout I hit the footbrake only for it to go straight to the floor because the brake fluid had hit boiling. Fortunately, pumping the footbrake a couple of times must have flushed some other fluid in and caused it to become effective again. Still, heart-stopping for a second or so.
  • Options

    Mr. Max, it's also worth noting those same Muslims will one day have jobs and have to get on with life.

    And that children are exempt from fasting [not sure how 'child' is defined in Islamic rules, though].

    Better start giving everybody Friday off...
  • Options

    Wow, Hashim Amla has quit as Saffers captain

    I believe he never wanted the job in the first place, but half way through a series, of which you are still well in, is very odd.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @JohnRentoul: Joe Haines, 87, not very polite about Jeremy in forthcoming New Statesman https://t.co/60FluTCbFS
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422

    Mr. Max, it's also worth noting those same Muslims will one day have jobs and have to get on with life.

    And that children are exempt from fasting [not sure how 'child' is defined in Islamic rules, though].

    That doesn't stop them from doing it though. I'd expect a noticeable drop in exam results in schools and districts with high muslim populations now that the exam season is coinciding with the fasting one.
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,298
    edited January 2016
    BBC Headline:- Police under fire over Cologne attacks

    So we are on Stage II on the usual depressing process. How long before we get to Stage III, the "we need to be careful we don't create a backlash / nothing to do with culture / religion / origin..."
  • Options

    Wow, Hashim Amla has quit as Saffers captain

    I believe he never wanted the job in the first place, but half way through a series, of which you are still well in, is very odd.
    Nasser Hussain did the same.
  • Options

    Wow, Hashim Amla has quit as Saffers captain

    I believe he never wanted the job in the first place, but half way through a series, of which you are still well in, is very odd.
    Nasser Hussain did the same.
    Good point.
  • Options
    flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903
    JonathanD said:

    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Roger said:


    I can't think of any national or international event however damaging to the Conservatives that would now benefit Labour. The public would just find a new alternative like they did with the SDP. Cameron must be the luckiest leader in history

    Sigh. An event that causes Corbyn and/or McDonnell to resign voluntarily might just have some benefit.
    If media time is anything to go by the party are being run by a small clique of Abbott Livingstone Corbyn and McDonnell. I heard livingstone claim that Oldham with the 'best result in a century' proved how popular Corbyn was. A ridiculous claim but short of a humiliating defeat at another one I can't see why they would resign
    The Labour have been riven mad by David Cameron electoral appeal.

    Just imagine how bad it will get when George Osborne wins a landslide in 2020.

    It would be ironic if Cameron, the second best Tory leader in 60 years, could only achieve a hung parliament and narrow majority, but Osborne, who lacks most of Cameron's electability and appeal, achieved a Blair-esque majority.
    Cameron gained something in the order of 100 seats in a single general election, if you want to put that all down to him.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,014
    Mr. Urquhart, you're behind the times on that. I believe Merkel's already jumped to your third stage, and some others too (there was a protest decrying racism.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    JohnO said:

    Crossing the floor would be a Top Trumps winner. Unlikely, but then everyday in Corbynistaland brings new wonders.

    kle4 said:

    I'm feeling deprived now. No resignations in over an hour :neutral:

    I would expect the next batch to come just before 5pm - ready for PM and the evening news shows
    If they are going to do it, I hope they try to top each other with bitter accusations or mode of resignation. Topping resigning on air may be tough.
    The ultimate would be an MP in a super-marginal crossing the floor and forcing a ratifying by-election as a Tory.

    This is not something I am predicting.
    But keep an eye on John Woodcock (I suspect you already are) who and whose constituency fits that perfectly.
    I wouldn't expect him to cross the floor but there is certainly the possibility of a by-election there that hands the seat to the Tories anyway, whether he stands as an independent or not. Labour going unilateralist doesn't quite meet his self-proclaimed trigger for resignation as that related to a Labour government, but it's close enough that he may go all the same.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,154
    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    You must really be looking forward to the next "Is Labour divided/not divided?" poll numbers then. You're gonna have a field day spinning them. And how, actually, yes, voters DO support split parties....
  • Options
    At least Labour are doing a good job of keeping themselves in teh news. Usually the oppo party in the year after the general election contents itself with a new leader and we will launch some commissions to deicde our policies for next time. Labout now have ready made policies and leader - a jolly good show it makes for too...
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,014
    Mr. Unslicker, that is a bit like appreciating the low central heating cost in the bowels of Hell.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    edited January 2016
    I've just watched the puddle and comments, I was glued. It's brilliant. Someone turned up with a lilo, another with a surfboard.

    It can't be more than 3" deep and 6' across.
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    ''Mr. Urquhart, you're behind the times on that. I believe Merkel's already jumped to your third stage, and some others too (there was a protest decrying racism. ''

    I feel a bit sorry for Germans. The grand coalition stitch up means its very difficult to turf out the government.
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,154

    I've just watched the puddle and comments, I was glued. It's brilliant. Someone turned up with a lilo, another with a surfboard.

    It can't be more than 3" deep and 6' across.

    Clearly the most exciting thing to have happened in the North-east since, er, you left....
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    You must really be looking forward to the next "Is Labour divided/not divided?" poll numbers then. You're gonna have a field day spinning them. And how, actually, yes, voters DO support split parties....
    But that is also going to apply to the Tories re - the EU Referendum!
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,014
    Mr. Taffys, likewise. Third Reich guilt has driven segments of the political class into an insane place.
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    taffys said:

    ''Mr. Urquhart, you're behind the times on that. I believe Merkel's already jumped to your third stage, and some others too (there was a protest decrying racism. ''

    I feel a bit sorry for Germans. The grand coalition stitch up means its very difficult to turf out the government.

    The Greeks did it after the ND-Pasok coalition.
  • Options
    taffys said:

    ''Mr. Urquhart, you're behind the times on that. I believe Merkel's already jumped to your third stage, and some others too (there was a protest decrying racism. ''

    I feel a bit sorry for Germans. The grand coalition stitch up means its very difficult to turf out the government.

    I feel very sorry for them. How were they to know Merkel would go from slow and steady approach to everything, to making totally bonkers rash decisions. Actually, all that nonsense about closing down the nuclear power stations might have been a clue.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    For our resident trainspotters
    In an effort that makes even the most dastardly of commutes look tame, Steve Wilson visited all 270 Tube stops in 15 hours and 45 minutes – shaving nearly half an hour off the previous record and winning back the title he last held in 2011.
    http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/tube-challenger-claws-back-world-record-for-fastest-journey-around-all-270-stations-a3149961.html
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
  • Options
    david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,422
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
    Who won the following election?
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Well I laughed

    Labour's Shadow Defence Secretary Hyacinth Bucket, i'm sorry its pronounced Emily Thornberry, saluting the troops! https://t.co/AwHBuWnkAV
  • Options
    Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 49,468
    edited January 2016

    For our resident trainspotters

    In an effort that makes even the most dastardly of commutes look tame, Steve Wilson visited all 270 Tube stops in 15 hours and 45 minutes – shaving nearly half an hour off the previous record and winning back the title he last held in 2011.
    http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/tube-challenger-claws-back-world-record-for-fastest-journey-around-all-270-stations-a3149961.html

    But the trouble is, there are actually 661 stations marked on the London Oystercard Map. Which, naturally, I have all visited.

    270/661 = only 41% :lol:
  • Options

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
    Who won the following election?
    Not Kinnock :)
  • Options
    DavidL said:

    Pulpstar said:

    DavidL said:

    Bad light now. That has been the other consideration today. If England were not able to bowl Finn and Broad what would be the point?

    So, despite one of the finest Innings I have ever seen and a few stumbles today, we have a test match where all of 19 wickets fell in 5 days of play. That is not good for the game. As a test wicket this was a disgrace.

    England could have won this.

    Catches win matches.
    They could undoubtedly have put SA under more pressure but take another 13 wickets on this wicket? I really doubt it.
    There were 10 dropped catches. So that is only 3 more wickets needed and potentially with the following on enforced.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    "Jeremy Corbyn’s reshuffle was less a night of the long knives than a day of misplaced cutlery" @MatthewdAncona https://t.co/QMqTckssX1
  • Options

    Well I laughed

    Labour's Shadow Defence Secretary Hyacinth Bucket, i'm sorry its pronounced Emily Thornberry, saluting the troops! https://t.co/AwHBuWnkAV

    Thats a cracker.
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
    Who won the following election?
    The Tories won in 1992 - but only after ditching Thatcher. They also lost 40 seats!
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,154
    edited January 2016
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    You must really be looking forward to the next "Is Labour divided/not divided?" poll numbers then. You're gonna have a field day spinning them. And how, actually, yes, voters DO support split parties....
    But that is also going to apply to the Tories re - the EU Referendum!
    When the public view the Tories are as split as Labour are on defence, on national security, on the economy - then I'll give a shit. The EU? Puh....as OGH repeatedly points out, it is W-A-Y down the list of things to worry about.

    Given that the country is split fifty something to forty something on the EU, then if Labour ISN'T split on the EU too, it will be portrayed in the media as Corbyn leading a party of group-think.
  • Options
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    You're the one that picked ICM?

    But if you want to resort to insults and weak arguments, you go for it. I'll let everyone else judge you accordingly.
  • Options
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
    Sorry everyone - that's ^^^ a weak argument.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @DPJHodges: The way things are going, I wouldn't be surprised if @PaulFlynnMP "One Leader. One Party. One Enemy" tweet became Labour's election slogan.
  • Options

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    You're the one that picked ICM?

    But if you want to resort to insults and weak arguments, you go for it. I'll let everyone else judge you accordingly.
    He keeps on ignoring what ICM said about their poll

    For our part, it is clear that phone polls steadfastly continue to collect too many Labour voters in the raw sample, and the challenge for phone polling is to find a way to overcome the systematic reasons for doing so. The methodological tweaks that we have introduced since the election in part help mitigate this phenomenon by proxy, but have not overcome the core challenge.


    http://www.icmunlimited.com/media-centre/guardian-voting/guardian-poll-december-2015
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    You're the one that picked ICM?

    But if you want to resort to insults and weak arguments, you go for it. I'll let everyone else judge you accordingly.
    Because it happens to be the most recent you idiot!
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    ''That's a cracker. ''

    If, as is possible, mass prosecutions of British troops for alleged war crimes in Iraq go ahead later this year, the defence brief will a key one.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,061

    BBC Headline:- Police under fire over Cologne attacks

    So we are on Stage II on the usual depressing process. How long before we get to Stage III, the "we need to be careful we don't create a backlash / nothing to do with culture / religion / origin..."

    Thursday, officially, but as Morris dancer says, we we generally start out with that as an accepted rule. Ow, so technically it already happened.
  • Options
    justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
    Sorry everyone - that's ^^^ a weak argument.
    It is not an argument at all - but a simple historical fact!
  • Options
    mattmatt Posts: 3,789
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
    Sorry everyone - that's ^^^ a weak argument.
    It is not an argument at all - but a simple historical fact!
    (a) it's near-on 30 years ago; and

    (b) can I offer you some more straws?
  • Options
    DixieDixie Posts: 1,221
    Looking forward to the next batch of opinion polls. Will the re-shuffle reduce Labour's ratings, specifically when it comes to voting? Often Labour supporters are told: 'you may not like your candidate, but hold your nose and vote for him.' Time for decent lefties to give the reds a miss.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @JohnRentoul: Maths question: If it takes Mr Corbyn 36 hours to fill 2 shadow cabinet posts, how long will it take to fill 3 vacancies & consequentials?
  • Options
    MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 50,154
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
    Who won the following election?
    The Tories won in 1992 - but only after ditching Thatcher. They also lost 40 seats!
    The Tories apparently also won in 1997. Under Blair...according to the Corbynista Orthodoxy.
  • Options
    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    This time in the 1987 Parliament Thatcher had a 14/15% lead!
    Sorry everyone - that's ^^^ a weak argument.
    It is not an argument at all

    Mate. We can read you know.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    I see Paul Flynn has deleted his tweet

    Stephen Doughty
    Just in case followers missed my comrade neighbour's tweet... https://t.co/eKrNu6wsNh
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,014
    Mr. P, won't happen, but it'd be hilarious trolling if one minister resigned every time a vacancy was filled.
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,631
    taffys said:

    ''Mr. Urquhart, you're behind the times on that. I believe Merkel's already jumped to your third stage, and some others too (there was a protest decrying racism. ''

    I feel a bit sorry for Germans. The grand coalition stitch up means its very difficult to turf out the government.

    I don't feel sorry for them. SPD voters should have been looking elsewhere for a while now and CDU voters need to start looking at AfD. The German people need to react and stop any chance of there being another grand coalition. The SPD are seeping vote share to the left and greens, and I expect after these latest attacks by immigrants people will take AfD much more seriously.

    Another one to look out for is the Netherlands.

    And Denmark:

    http://10news.dk/?p=1207

    "Muslims who whipped woman in face with iron chains laughs in court"
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    ''Time for decent lefties to give the reds a miss. ''

    Perhaps the voters of Oldham have done more to damage the labour party than the tories ever could
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    Is he in a parallel universe?

    Paul Flynn
    Major boost for Labour in Parliament with return of Emily Thornberry, principled, idealist, intellectually strong & brilliant communicator.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    It's a pity we don't get many polls these days, it would be interesting to see what the Labour share is at the moment.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,014
    Mr. Max, worth also remembering that over here some **** judge said child sex abuse should be considered a worse crime for those from certain communities [being vague due to forgetting the detail rather than political correctness] because of their culture.

    I forget the details [again], but when we looked at German politics at school it seemed the system was practically designed to stop any one party getting a majority (not as bad as the hopelessly fragmented Israeli system but closer to that than ours).
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    I see Paul Flynn has deleted his tweet

    Stephen Doughty
    Just in case followers missed my comrade neighbour's tweet... https://t.co/eKrNu6wsNh

    I think we can assume that cross-constituency co-operation is going to be frosty in south Wales for the foreseeable future.
  • Options
    Blue_rogBlue_rog Posts: 2,019
    MaxPB said:

    taffys said:

    ''Mr. Urquhart, you're behind the times on that. I believe Merkel's already jumped to your third stage, and some others too (there was a protest decrying racism. ''

    I feel a bit sorry for Germans. The grand coalition stitch up means its very difficult to turf out the government.

    I don't feel sorry for them. SPD voters should have been looking elsewhere for a while now and CDU voters need to start looking at AfD. The German people need to react and stop any chance of there being another grand coalition. The SPD are seeping vote share to the left and greens, and I expect after these latest attacks by immigrants people will take AfD much more seriously.

    Another one to look out for is the Netherlands.

    And Denmark:

    http://10news.dk/?p=1207

    "Muslims who whipped woman in face with iron chains laughs in court"
    That is sick. How long will the normal population of Europe put up with this. If the Eurocrats are not careful, this could see the rise and rise of nazi type fringe groups.
  • Options
    RecidivistRecidivist Posts: 4,679
    JonathanD said:

    Roger said:

    Jonathan said:

    Roger said:


    I can't think of any national or international event however damaging to the Conservatives that would now benefit Labour. The public would just find a new alternative like they did with the SDP. Cameron must be the luckiest leader in history

    Sigh. An event that causes Corbyn and/or McDonnell to resign voluntarily might just have some benefit.
    If media time is anything to go by the party are being run by a small clique of Abbott Livingstone Corbyn and McDonnell. I heard livingstone claim that Oldham with the 'best result in a century' proved how popular Corbyn was. A ridiculous claim but short of a humiliating defeat at another one I can't see why they would resign
    The Labour have been riven mad by David Cameron electoral appeal.

    Just imagine how bad it will get when George Osborne wins a landslide in 2020.

    It would be ironic if Cameron, the second best Tory leader in 60 years, could only achieve a hung parliament and narrow majority, but Osborne, who lacks most of Cameron's electability and appeal, achieved a Blair-esque majority.
    Second best? I'd say he was head and shoulders above all the post war Tory leaders. I can't think who you think was better.
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    Didn't Paul Flynn vote for Kendall in the leadership contest?
  • Options
    Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    But comparing polls now with polls this time last parliament is not like-with-like, since both main parties at this time had the same leaders they'd have at the election.
  • Options
    I see Paul Flynn showing his true colours. He was on SKY the other evening and said "should be getting after the enemy" i.e. the tories. Why do they have to use this appallying language, cant they just say "the opposition?
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @paulbsinclair: Wolfie from Tooting writes to ask: what's the point of hiring a Stalinist if he can't organise a decent purge?
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    I see Paul Flynn showing his true colours. He was on SKY the other evening and said "should be getting after the enemy" i.e. the tories. Why do they have to use this appallying language, cant they just say "the opposition?

    Paul Flynn will be 81 next month.
  • Options
    not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,341
    Danny565 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    justin124 said:

    HYUFD said:

    justin124 said:

    Scott_P said:

    @Jamin2g: People are resigning on television, Labour are trailing by double digits in most polls. Has the penny dropped now?
    #bbcdp #pmqs

    No they are not! Most polls have them 5 to 8 points behind.
    The latest poll from yougov has Labour 10 points behind
    But the most recent poll in terms of fieldwork dates is actually ICM which has Labour only 5 points behind.
    Keep spinning, you might even convince yourself.
    I am not spinning - why on earth not try checking the facts for once? It really is not so difficult to access these sources if you are genuinely interested. Frankly 'spin' seems to come far more naturally to you than to many others. You appear to not want to know the facts and would prefer to remain psephologically pretty ignorant whilst spouting propaganda.
    Picking one poll that you like outside of a number that could be equally relevant could be fairly described as spinning, no?
    But ICM was NOT the lowest lead! Why not check your facts before such stupid comments?
    No, indeed. 4% is the lowest lead the Conservatives have had, eight months after the election. This time last parliament, Miliband had a steady lead.
    But comparing polls now with polls this time last parliament is not like-with-like, since both main parties at this time had the same leaders they'd have at the election.
    And we now know that the polls were fatally flawed
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Oil about to go sub-$34. Maybe something to do with the Saudi / Iran confrontation.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/energy
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,014
    Lady Bucket, I saw that, and noticed the language (was it Churchill who made the adversaries/enemies quote?).
  • Options
    FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 76,298
    edited January 2016
    Blue_rog said:

    MaxPB said:

    taffys said:

    ''Mr. Urquhart, you're behind the times on that. I believe Merkel's already jumped to your third stage, and some others too (there was a protest decrying racism. ''

    I feel a bit sorry for Germans. The grand coalition stitch up means its very difficult to turf out the government.

    I don't feel sorry for them. SPD voters should have been looking elsewhere for a while now and CDU voters need to start looking at AfD. The German people need to react and stop any chance of there being another grand coalition. The SPD are seeping vote share to the left and greens, and I expect after these latest attacks by immigrants people will take AfD much more seriously.

    Another one to look out for is the Netherlands.

    And Denmark:

    http://10news.dk/?p=1207

    "Muslims who whipped woman in face with iron chains laughs in court"
    That is sick. How long will the normal population of Europe put up with this. If the Eurocrats are not careful, this could see the rise and rise of nazi type fringe groups.
    To be fair...

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3387078/I-didn-t-way-Gang-attack-victim-thought-going-die-beaten-pulp-35-thugs-wielding-baseball-bats-golf-clubs-confronted-stone-throwing-youths.html

    You are always going to get small gangs of scum bags that enjoy beating people up etc.

    The difference between the two cases above and Germany is scale. They are talking about a organised gang of 1000-2000 people imported into areas of Germany that had none of this only 5 years ago, and now suffering huge problems which appears to have been swept under the carpet. The stuff that went on at New Year's appears to have been of such scale all in one place that they can't ignore it.
  • Options
    runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    'That is sick. How long will the normal population of Europe put up with this. If the Eurocrats are not careful, this could see the rise and rise of nazi type fringe groups.'

    The answer in that case will of course be 'mehr Europa'
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 92,061
    taffys said:

    ''Time for decent lefties to give the reds a miss. ''

    Perhaps the voters of Oldham have done more to damage the labour party than the tories ever could

    Really it's McMahon's fault - being apparently such an obviously stellar candidate, he fooled everyone about Labour under Corbyn!
  • Options
    CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,230
    MaxPB said:

    This is the kind of stuff that gets people's backs up:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/12084785/Exams-to-be-taken-earlier-in-the-day-to-fit-around-Ramadan-exam-boards-say.html

    It's a joke, how about Muslims integrate into our way of life rather than inconvenience millions of non-Muslim schoolchildren. If living here is incompatible with their religion, well they know where the door is.

    I had thought that children were excused fasting on the grounds that they are children. I'd have thought it an act of cruelty to stop a child taking any food or drink during a hot June day when they are active.

  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    In other news...

    Nicola Sturgeon put independence back on the agenda for this year’s Holyrood election when she kicked off the campaign
    http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/scotland/article4657700.ece

    And they have already released the question...

    https://twitter.com/derkennedysinnf/status/684504388518461440
This discussion has been closed.