Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Yes we Khan – Sadiq Khan wins the London Mayoral nomination

24

Comments

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    UKIP should not stand in the London Mayoralty. Every vote counts, Khan cannot be MoL.

    I'd be voting Goldsmith even if I were the UKIP candidate!!
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @GuidoFawkes: LISTEN PM: "We just thought people in Yorkshire hated everyone else, we didn’t realise they hated each other so much” http://t.co/XSYaE0DQOg

    Is he wrong?
  • I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.
  • MM..Brilliant..
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,064
    Wow, I might go out and campaign for Zac after this. No way we can allow a shit like Khan to be the Mayor.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    The Bus Drivers son v The Billionaires son.
    The back stories are intresting.
    I think Sadiq Khan is a good choice for London.

    Obviously not for the disgusted from tunbridge wells on PB from the shires.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Polly Toynbee has just predicted Khan will win...
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,994
    TGOHF said:

    SK is also the union shill candidate - the champion of tube strikes.

    Add in Crosby running ZG's campaign...

    And tapping in to the awesome election database they built up for the General in May..... Probably only need to enter a couple of new parameters into their Al Gore Rhythms - and they will be able to predict the anti-Khan vote with great precision.
  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    Mr T,

    "The political dictionary requires a new word for what Labour are doing."

    If Jezza wins, they will need a new name. New Labour will seem tainted with election success, so what about "Revolutionary Labour"?

    But I still hope even though the votes are cast.

    1983 may be looked back upon with nostalgia; a time when when they had a scruffy bastard for leader, but one who had at least two brain cells to rub together.
  • LennonLennon Posts: 1,782
    isam said:

    UKIP should not stand in the London Mayoralty. Every vote counts, Khan cannot be MoL.

    I'd be voting Goldsmith even if I were the UKIP candidate!!

    You know that the London Mayoralty uses Supplementary Vote right? So you can Vote UKIP-1, Zac-2.
  • fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,320
    Twitter
    George Eaton ‏@georgeeaton 12m12 minutes ago
    Sadiq Khan confirms that he will stand down as Tooting MP. Early by-election test for Labour in marginal seat.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,055
    AndyJS said:

    SeanT said:

    Corbyn NAILED on.

    The political dictionary requires a new word for what Labour are doing to themselves. This is far beyond the mild Tory madness of IDS.

    Has any serious Western party, from Europe to North America to Australasia, spazzed out the way Labour are spazzing out now?

    The Swedish Social Democrats are doing their best to court oblivion with their migration policy.
    They will keep most of the core nothing more which will help them avoid the fate of Canada's Progressive Conservatives and Greece's PASOK who were outflanked by Reform and Syriza to the I right and left respectively
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Yorkcity said:

    The Bus Drivers son v The Billionaires son.
    The back stories are intresting.
    I think Sadiq Khan is a good choice for London.

    Obviously not for the disgusted from tunbridge wells on PB from the shires.

    I think recent elections show that people don't give an Aylesbury duck what people were born into or which school they went to.

    It's welcome progress.
  • I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I guess 'Into the Darkness' might be problematic.....
  • welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,464

    I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I am no Trekky (honest ! no really really honest!), but was not "Khan" a "product of late 20th century genetic engineering"?. In which case he walks amongst us right now......... just sayin'
  • Heathrow now seriously in play. What is Corbynista view of airport expansion?
  • fitalass said:

    Twitter
    George Eaton ‏@georgeeaton 12m12 minutes ago
    Sadiq Khan confirms that he will stand down as Tooting MP. Early by-election test for Labour in marginal seat.

    To clarify, Khan will stand down if he wins.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591

    Apparently David Cameron insulted Yorkshire.

    I assume he suggested Yorkshireites are too easily insulted? That seems to be about the standard insult they get worked up about ;)
  • Just got a bit matched on Corbyn at 17.5!

    To finish 2nd.
  • welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,464
    TGOHF said:

    Yorkcity said:

    The Bus Drivers son v The Billionaires son.
    The back stories are intresting.
    I think Sadiq Khan is a good choice for London.

    Obviously not for the disgusted from tunbridge wells on PB from the shires.

    I think recent elections show that people don't give an Aylesbury duck what people were born into or which school they went to.

    It's welcome progress.
    Indeed.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,064
    Yorkcity said:

    The Bus Drivers son v The Billionaires son.
    The back stories are intresting.
    I think Sadiq Khan is a good choice for London.

    Obviously not for the disgusted from tunbridge wells on PB from the shires.

    And yet Boris won two elections in a row. London is not as simple as wealth and backgrounds.
  • I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I guess 'Into the Darkness' might be problematic.....
    I did think of using Into Darkness for when Labour elect Corbyn or maybe the The Undiscovered country.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    edited September 2015
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    Just think within a few years we could have a Muslim leading London and another Muslim leading the country and the Tories.

    SJ isn't a practising Muslim.

    Ok.

    Just think within a few years we could have the sons of Pakistani immigrants leading London and another leading the country and the Tories.

    I keep on telling you those sorts of chaps are awesome.
    Bit racist of you to assume his religion based on his nationality ? :D
    When did Sajid Javed become a Christian ? Or, does his membership of "Friends of Israel" mean more than that.

    AFAIK, Javed is a [ lapsed ] Muslim.

    Aren't both Khan's and Javed's dads bus drivers ?
  • welshowl said:

    I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I am no Trekky (honest ! no really really honest!), but was not "Khan" a "product of late 20th century genetic engineering"?. In which case he walks amongst us right now......... just sayin'
    He was from this era. The Eugenics war took place in 1996
  • Apparently David Cameron insulted Yorkshire.

    Anyone got a link to signing up to UKIP?

    What about Yorkshire First?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046
    Scott_P said:

    Polly Toynbee has just predicted Khan will win...

    Is "nailed on" the correct terminology?\

    How many sleeps till the Corbyn coronation?
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    isam said:

    UKIP should not stand in the London Mayoralty. Every vote counts, Khan cannot be MoL.

    I'd be voting Goldsmith even if I were the UKIP candidate!!

    Isn't it a truncated AV with second preferences? So can vote UKIP and Con?

    Perhaps TSE could explain the mechanics...
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    I always thought of Foot as unworldly and idealistic - someone totally unsuited to the rough and tumble of daily politics.

    Corbyn has been exposed as someone with a dark agenda based on hating rather too much of our country, and sucking up to anyone who threatens us.

    Thankfully, he'll never ever be PM - no matter what @JosiasJessop muses as a whatifery scenario :wink:
    CD13 said:

    Mr T,

    "The political dictionary requires a new word for what Labour are doing."

    If Jezza wins, they will need a new name. New Labour will seem tainted with election success, so what about "Revolutionary Labour"?

    But I still hope even though the votes are cast.

    1983 may be looked back upon with nostalgia; a time when when they had a scruffy bastard for leader, but one who had at least two brain cells to rub together.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046
    edited September 2015
    fitalass said:

    Twitter
    George Eaton ‏@georgeeaton 12m12 minutes ago
    Sadiq Khan confirms that he will stand down as Tooting MP. Early by-election test for Labour in marginal seat.

    And just yesterday we were talking about the fact there would be no by-elections in 2015! Unless the writ isn't moved until new years.

    Edit: oh, it's if he wins!
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591
    edited September 2015

    I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I guess 'Into the Darkness' might be problematic.....
    Goodpoint. 'This might earn me the wrath of Khan, but might he lead London Labour Into Darkness?' is perhaps too contrived. Perhaps.
  • welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,464

    welshowl said:

    I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I am no Trekky (honest ! no really really honest!), but was not "Khan" a "product of late 20th century genetic engineering"?. In which case he walks amongst us right now......... just sayin'
    He was from this era. The Eugenics war took place in 1996
    I was a bit busy in '96, so I must've missed that.
  • York City.. I fixed it for you..The Bus Drivers Racist Son..
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Ace! Just the sort of contest we needed.

    One of the things that made EdM's reign so boring were only safe seats coming up during his tenure.
    fitalass said:

    Twitter
    George Eaton ‏@georgeeaton 12m12 minutes ago
    Sadiq Khan confirms that he will stand down as Tooting MP. Early by-election test for Labour in marginal seat.

  • Heathrow now seriously in play. What is Corbynista view of airport expansion?

    Is it a source of gainful employment or a valuable target for IRA mortars?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,994
    edited September 2015
    welshowl said:

    welshowl said:

    I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I am no Trekky (honest ! no really really honest!), but was not "Khan" a "product of late 20th century genetic engineering"?. In which case he walks amongst us right now......... just sayin'
    He was from this era. The Eugenics war took place in 1996
    I was a bit busy in '96, so I must've missed that.
    It was led by John Major. Against the Bastards.

    EDIT: He made a pretty fair case against them...
  • Plato said:

    I always thought of Foot as unworldly and idealistic - someone totally unsuited to the rough and tumble of daily politics.

    Corbyn has been exposed as someone with a dark agenda based on hating rather too much of our country, and sucking up to anyone who threatens us.

    Thankfully, he'll never ever be PM - no matter what @JosiasJessop muses as a whatifery scenario :wink:

    Needless to say, I hope you're right and I'm wrong (although I've never said he will be PM; just that he might cause the Conservatives more trouble than people think atm).
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    ''Corbyn has been exposed as someone with a dark agenda based on hating rather too much of our country, and sucking up to anyone who threatens us.''

    I used to think labour were simply indifferent to south east dwelling tories like me. They just ignored us.

    Now I think there's genuine hatred. Hopefully that will galvanise conservatives.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Being stuck on Fantasy Island seems to be the destination for Labour right now.
    welshowl said:

    I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I am no Trekky (honest ! no really really honest!), but was not "Khan" a "product of late 20th century genetic engineering"?. In which case he walks amongst us right now......... just sayin'
  • Apparently David Cameron insulted Yorkshire.

    Anyone got a link to signing up to UKIP?

    What about Yorkshire First?
    Not my cup of mango juice
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549

    Heathrow now seriously in play. What is Corbynista view of airport expansion?

    120% for it. ! Labour must be mad not to support Heathrow expansion. Clear tarmac between Labour and the Tories / Libs / Greens.

    What could be better ?
  • OK help me out please, how does Khan winning make Corbyn winning more likely?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,591

    Plato said:

    I always thought of Foot as unworldly and idealistic - someone totally unsuited to the rough and tumble of daily politics.

    Corbyn has been exposed as someone with a dark agenda based on hating rather too much of our country, and sucking up to anyone who threatens us.

    Thankfully, he'll never ever be PM - no matter what @JosiasJessop muses as a whatifery scenario :wink:

    Needless to say, I hope you're right and I'm wrong (although I've never said he will be PM; just that he might cause the Conservatives more trouble than people think atm).
    Hesurely will do - despite the efforts of excited Tories to remain grounded, just in case, the temptation to think he will be as terrible as things appear is understandable and the dream will surely, surely, have to stop at some point for them.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Lennon said:

    isam said:

    UKIP should not stand in the London Mayoralty. Every vote counts, Khan cannot be MoL.

    I'd be voting Goldsmith even if I were the UKIP candidate!!

    You know that the London Mayoralty uses Supplementary Vote right? So you can Vote UKIP-1, Zac-2.
    Oh I didn't actually! I'm not really into all that

    Anything to stop a left wing muslim who proposes ethnic quotas running London. Seeing the violence in Brick Lane last night, this could be the start of a lot of trouble.

    Ill vote Zac-1 Zac-2 just to make sure there can be no misunderstanding.

    If Khan wins I'll start OZIP (Outer Zones Independence Party)

  • welshowlwelshowl Posts: 4,464
    kle4 said:

    I've been waiting months to use the Wrath of Khan gag.

    I guess 'Into the Darkness' might be problematic.....
    Goodpoint. 'This might earn me the wrath of Khan, but might he lead London Labour Into Darkness?' is perhaps too contrived. Perhaps.
    Stephen Hawking was postulating the other day (think it was him) that Black Holes might not lead to oblivion as previously thought but once past the event horizon there was no return possible but you might pass into a parallel universe. Which seems oddly apt for reasons I can't quite put my fingers on this weekend.......
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Corybn will ban outgoing flights from Heathrow to prevent evil exports and inboard flights will be limited to refugees.
  • SeanT said:

    Heathrow now seriously in play. What is Corbynista view of airport expansion?

    Against.
    Whilst I still prefer Boris Island to Heathrow expansion as a long-term solution, that battle's been lost. London needs more capacity ASAP, and more endless talking will just cause the London and UK economy harm.

    Let's get building at Heathrow.
  • taffys said:

    ''Corbyn has been exposed as someone with a dark agenda based on hating rather too much of our country, and sucking up to anyone who threatens us.''
    I used to think labour were simply indifferent to south east dwelling tories like me. They just ignored us.
    Now I think there's genuine hatred. Hopefully that will galvanise conservatives.

    Well I have always realised it.
    I'm contemplating joining the Tory Party. Do they have a special rate for pensioners?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,994
    Fair to suggest that Corbyn's coat-tails helped Khan get such a decisive result? I guess we'll know tomorrow....

  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    RobD said:

    fitalass said:

    Twitter
    George Eaton ‏@georgeeaton 12m12 minutes ago
    Sadiq Khan confirms that he will stand down as Tooting MP. Early by-election test for Labour in marginal seat.

    And just yesterday we were talking about the fact there would be no by-elections in 2015! Unless the writ isn't moved until new years.

    Edit: oh, it's if he wins!
    That pushed a potential Labour loss only after the London elections and only in the case Khan hasn't lost anyway. That gives 8 months for Corbyn to get his act together.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34222801

    I always new this is how Cameron felt about Yorkshire.
  • OK help me out please, how does Khan winning make Corbyn winning more likely?

    Ken Livingstone said a few weeks ago, in their canvass returns there was a 90% crossover between Corbyn supporters and Khan supporters.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    isam said:

    Lennon said:

    isam said:

    UKIP should not stand in the London Mayoralty. Every vote counts, Khan cannot be MoL.

    I'd be voting Goldsmith even if I were the UKIP candidate!!

    You know that the London Mayoralty uses Supplementary Vote right? So you can Vote UKIP-1, Zac-2.
    Oh I didn't actually! I'm not really into all that

    Anything to stop a left wing muslim who proposes ethnic quotas running London. Seeing the violence in Brick Lane last night, this could be the start of a lot of trouble.

    Ill vote Zac-1 Zac-2 just to make sure there can be no misunderstanding.

    If Khan wins I'll start OZIP (Outer Zones Independence Party)

    Were you not the UKIP candidate in Islington ? Did you win ?
  • TGOHF said:

    Yorkcity said:

    The Bus Drivers son v The Billionaires son.
    The back stories are intresting.
    I think Sadiq Khan is a good choice for London.

    Obviously not for the disgusted from tunbridge wells on PB from the shires.

    I think recent elections show that people don't give an Aylesbury duck what people were born into or which school they went to.

    It's welcome progress.
    :+1:

  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    edited September 2015
    Leith Walk council By-Election results are both sensationally exciting STV count off and a crushing waste of time

    Results here: http://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/6153/ward_12_-_leith_walk_by-election_results_2015.pdf

    In first round prefs SNP were first with Labour in Second. That was the eventual election result.

    However it took the full 10 rounds for Labour to get the second seat. It must have been a gnat's whisker between them and the Greens

    EDIT: Just seen the full rounds are available in that PDF, wasn't as close as I thought.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    https://www.conservatives.com/join

    taffys said:

    ''Corbyn has been exposed as someone with a dark agenda based on hating rather too much of our country, and sucking up to anyone who threatens us.''
    I used to think labour were simply indifferent to south east dwelling tories like me. They just ignored us.
    Now I think there's genuine hatred. Hopefully that will galvanise conservatives.

    Well I have always realised it.
    I'm contemplating joining the Tory Party. Do they have a special rate for pensioners?
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    SeanT said:

    If true, this would explain the many strange anomalies surrounding that poor drowned child.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/11/drowned-aylan-kurdis-father-accused-of-being-people-smuggler-at-helm-of-capsized-boat/

    Pathetic !
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046

    Heathrow now seriously in play. What is Corbynista view of airport expansion?

    Is it a source of gainful employment or a valuable target for IRA mortars?
    Both - someone's gotta fire those mortars :p
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100

    SeanT said:

    Heathrow now seriously in play. What is Corbynista view of airport expansion?

    Against.
    Whilst I still prefer Boris Island to Heathrow expansion as a long-term solution, that battle's been lost. London needs more capacity ASAP, and more endless talking will just cause the London and UK economy harm.

    Let's get building at Heathrow.
    You can't, it's full.
    Try Gatwick instead.
  • Blue_rogBlue_rog Posts: 2,019

    SeanT said:

    Heathrow now seriously in play. What is Corbynista view of airport expansion?

    Against.
    Whilst I still prefer Boris Island to Heathrow expansion as a long-term solution, that battle's been lost. London needs more capacity ASAP, and more endless talking will just cause the London and UK economy harm.

    Let's get building at Heathrow.
    I agree with you on both counts. I was stuck circling Heathrow for 30 minutes yesterday morning and missed my connecting flight grrr. Was stuck in Terminal 5 for 4 hours!!!

    All down to congestion.
  • Thanks TSE that's interesting and in London doesn't surprise me. Food for thought as to the make up of Corbyn's cabinet, I'd suggest it'll be very London/ethnic centric.
  • GIN1138GIN1138 Posts: 22,391
    I guess this is the "starter" for tomorrows "main course".

    Labour = Officially mad!
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046
    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    surbiton said:

    isam said:

    Lennon said:

    isam said:

    UKIP should not stand in the London Mayoralty. Every vote counts, Khan cannot be MoL.

    I'd be voting Goldsmith even if I were the UKIP candidate!!

    You know that the London Mayoralty uses Supplementary Vote right? So you can Vote UKIP-1, Zac-2.
    Oh I didn't actually! I'm not really into all that

    Anything to stop a left wing muslim who proposes ethnic quotas running London. Seeing the violence in Brick Lane last night, this could be the start of a lot of trouble.

    Ill vote Zac-1 Zac-2 just to make sure there can be no misunderstanding.

    If Khan wins I'll start OZIP (Outer Zones Independence Party)

    Were you not the UKIP candidate in Islington ? Did you win ?
    I wasn't, so I didn't!
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    The by-election people have been talking about will take place in Richmond - before the Mayor election.

    The Tories are about to do a U-turn and Goldsmith is pledge bound to resign being an MP if that happens.

    It might also suit him and the Tories. They wouldn't want discussions about Heathrow to dominate next May.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    If true - that'd burst more bubbles than Assange skipping bail.
    SeanT said:

    If true, this would explain the many strange anomalies surrounding that poor drowned child.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/11/drowned-aylan-kurdis-father-accused-of-being-people-smuggler-at-helm-of-capsized-boat/

  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    isam said:

    surbiton said:

    isam said:

    Lennon said:

    isam said:

    UKIP should not stand in the London Mayoralty. Every vote counts, Khan cannot be MoL.

    I'd be voting Goldsmith even if I were the UKIP candidate!!

    You know that the London Mayoralty uses Supplementary Vote right? So you can Vote UKIP-1, Zac-2.
    Oh I didn't actually! I'm not really into all that

    Anything to stop a left wing muslim who proposes ethnic quotas running London. Seeing the violence in Brick Lane last night, this could be the start of a lot of trouble.

    Ill vote Zac-1 Zac-2 just to make sure there can be no misunderstanding.

    If Khan wins I'll start OZIP (Outer Zones Independence Party)

    Were you not the UKIP candidate in Islington ? Did you win ?
    I wasn't, so I didn't!
    But you were a UKIP candidate somewhere ?
  • SeanT said:

    If true, this would explain the many strange anomalies surrounding that poor drowned child.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/11/drowned-aylan-kurdis-father-accused-of-being-people-smuggler-at-helm-of-capsized-boat/


    If true, that will make a few people eat their words.

    Oh wait, no it won't; they will carry on as before, always thinking they are right.

  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,572

    If you want to know another example of Labour's problem's it's that Abbott got through to the fourth round, whilst Wolmar got knocked out in the second.

    30% of Abbott's vote was redistributed to Jowell (ignoring those who didn't express a preference) - shows the dangers of assuming that blocs of votes switch in a regimented fashion. ABC punters take note.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    FPT: Mr. kle4, there'll be some. People have bizarre fetishes [weirdest I ever heard of was a blinking fetish].

    Disgrace that someone overtly proposing ethnic quotas in the workplace will aspire to be London mayor on Labour's behalf. It's sheer racism to literally discriminate based on skin colour.

    Congrats on your win, Mr. Eagles, and thanks to Mr. Manson for his wise tip, which I foolishly did not follow [not sure if I saw it, to be fair].

    Did you notice my subtle Star Trek reference?
    Subtle?

    I got the blindingly obvious ones, but perhaps I missed the subtle one?
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    York City.. I fixed it for you..The Bus Drivers Racist Son..

    Say more about you diddery.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046
    surbiton said:

    The by-election people have been talking about will take place in Richmond - before the Mayor election.

    The Tories are about to do a U-turn and Goldsmith is pledge bound to resign being an MP if that happens.

    It might also suit him and the Tories. They wouldn't want discussions about Heathrow to dominate next May.

    How is accepting the recommendations of a commission set up to look into a question, when you said you would accept said recommendations, a U-turn?
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    RobD said:

    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
    I think you will find the Judge's report did not label him as a corrupt politician. It also did not find him as an extremist Jihadi.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    RobD said:

    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
    It was a very strong identity politics that kept a very corrupt and incompetent person as mayor, as such i'm allergic to people whom their only selling point is either the colour of their skin, their religion, or their gender.

    Khan will have to persuade me that he isn't a new Lutfur Rahman.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    Is see the big thing was where the Lib Dem and Conservative second prefs went - they both broke for Labour over Green.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited September 2015
    Putting to one side the uneasy feeling of doom I have at the thought of Khan being Mayor of London and the carnage that will follow, you have to say great PB effort for the two candidates to have been tipped up at bigger than 12/1 combined

    I am not on either! But well done @HenryGManson & @Tissue_Price
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    edited September 2015
    With regard to Brick Lane.. I have always found that the money spent there is welcomed but the presence of the mainly WASP clientele is most definitely not .. There was always the feeling of resentment when I was obliged to work there for a major production company and the female staff were definitely uncomfortable about their treatment when they had to leave the offices. Perhaps some curry hungry customers may look elsewhere if there is any more trouble.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    Speedy said:

    RobD said:

    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
    It was a very strong identity politics that kept a very corrupt and incompetent person as mayor, as such i'm allergic to people whom their only selling point is either the colour of their skin, their religion, or their gender.

    Khan will have to persuade me that he isn't a new Lutfur Rahman.
    Are you a London voter ?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046
    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
    I think you will find the Judge's report did not label him as a corrupt politician. It also did not find him as an extremist Jihadi.
    I thought he was dishing out money to his favourite causes in a bid to get re-elected? Sounds corrupt to me. I hope the Judge didn't call him an exemplar of British politics.
  • shadsyshadsy Posts: 289
    Well done Henry Manson for the 33/1 Khan tip and numerous Pbers who followed his advice.

    Even so, not a bad result for Ladbrokes; Jowell would have been much worse.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    The by-election people have been talking about will take place in Richmond - before the Mayor election.

    The Tories are about to do a U-turn and Goldsmith is pledge bound to resign being an MP if that happens.

    It might also suit him and the Tories. They wouldn't want discussions about Heathrow to dominate next May.

    How is accepting the recommendations of a commission set up to look into a question, when you said you would accept said recommendations, a U-turn?
    But Goldsmith has said categorically that he will resign if the Tory party policy changes on Heathrow
  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138
    edited September 2015
    DavidL said:

    10 years ago when Cameron first came along it was all about how the Tories cared too and had no less of a moral conscience than Labour did, they just disagreed on means. It would appear they've given up on that and Osborne seems entirely comfortable in his ruthlessly cynical skin.

    As you would expect given that it is the New Statesman it is not uncritical but his determination to dominate the centre ground and his easy acceptance of a positive roll for the State shows what problems Labour have.
    You are easily taken in, Mr L. Centre ground fiddlesticks! In the general election, Cameron and Osborne posed as the "Continuity Coalition" (which was popular and successful), and Osborne has still not dropped the language of the Lib Dems. But he does not mean it, as can be seen in the way he has been savaging the policies that the Lib Dems brought to the last government.

    And "a positive roll (sic) for the State"? - he is slashing expenditure right, left and centre. No wonder he is the darling of the Tory hard right wing.

    So his "determination to dominate the centre ground", as you call it, is absolute nonsense. What you mean is his determination to redefine "the centre ground" as somewhere in the middle of the Tory spectrum.

    Mr Booth is right on Osborne and the Tories.

    What the country needs is a government founded on economic competence, but with a large amount of compassion. Labour fail on the one, and the Tories on the other. The Lib Dems are ready and waiting, and recent local government byelection results show that the people are missing them and want them back.

  • SeanT said:

    Heathrow now seriously in play. What is Corbynista view of airport expansion?

    Against.
    Whilst I still prefer Boris Island to Heathrow expansion as a long-term solution, that battle's been lost. London needs more capacity ASAP, and more endless talking will just cause the London and UK economy harm.

    Let's get building at Heathrow.
    Why can't Londoners just connect through Amsterdam like the rest of us do?
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046
    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    The by-election people have been talking about will take place in Richmond - before the Mayor election.

    The Tories are about to do a U-turn and Goldsmith is pledge bound to resign being an MP if that happens.

    It might also suit him and the Tories. They wouldn't want discussions about Heathrow to dominate next May.

    How is accepting the recommendations of a commission set up to look into a question, when you said you would accept said recommendations, a U-turn?
    But Goldsmith has said categorically that he will resign if the Tory party policy changes on Heathrow
    Isn't the policy to accept the recommendation of the commission? Surely this is a much better policy than arbitrarily deciding to do something/not to do something.
  • richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    edited September 2015
    YORK CITY Anyone who says he will impose ethnic quotas is most definitely racist..says a lot about Mr KHAN..
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    surbiton said:

    The by-election people have been talking about will take place in Richmond - before the Mayor election.

    The Tories are about to do a U-turn and Goldsmith is pledge bound to resign being an MP if that happens.

    It might also suit him and the Tories. They wouldn't want discussions about Heathrow to dominate next May.

    It's interesting that Goldsmith might run as a quazi-independent for mayor waving the flag against Heathrow anyway.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
    I think you will find the Judge's report did not label him as a corrupt politician. It also did not find him as an extremist Jihadi.
    I thought he was dishing out money to his favourite causes in a bid to get re-elected? Sounds corrupt to me. I hope the Judge didn't call him an exemplar of British politics.
    I didn't know the Police were involved. Please enlighten us. Corruption is a criminal offence.
  • JEOJEO Posts: 3,656
    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    The by-election people have been talking about will take place in Richmond - before the Mayor election.

    The Tories are about to do a U-turn and Goldsmith is pledge bound to resign being an MP if that happens.

    It might also suit him and the Tories. They wouldn't want discussions about Heathrow to dominate next May.

    How is accepting the recommendations of a commission set up to look into a question, when you said you would accept said recommendations, a U-turn?
    But Goldsmith has said categorically that he will resign if the Tory party policy changes on Heathrow
    Isn't the policy to accept the recommendation of the commission? Surely this is a much better policy than arbitrarily deciding to do something/not to do something.
    Yes and yes. But an even better policy is to form a view objectively, listening to the commission as simply one point of view among many. The commission was very flawed, and did not take into account noise pollution in its economic calculations.
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @jonwalker121: Sadiq Khan: "I won't be voting for Jeremy Corbyn and I don't think he can lead us to election victory in 2020." https://t.co/oAkAQNS8Vd
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
    I think you will find the Judge's report did not label him as a corrupt politician. It also did not find him as an extremist Jihadi.
    I thought he was dishing out money to his favourite causes in a bid to get re-elected? Sounds corrupt to me. I hope the Judge didn't call him an exemplar of British politics.
    How would you describe the act of Party's giving knighthood's to their donors ?
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    surbiton said:

    SeanT said:

    If true, this would explain the many strange anomalies surrounding that poor drowned child.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/11/drowned-aylan-kurdis-father-accused-of-being-people-smuggler-at-helm-of-capsized-boat/

    Pathetic !
    No, what's pathetic is that you think we shouldn't bother to look into the facts of the case.
  • Douglas bangs the Ukip drum eloquently as usual

    http://www.talkcarswell.com/home/ukips-chance/2865
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    SeanT said:

    Scott_P said:

    @jonwalker121: Sadiq Khan: "I won't be voting for Jeremy Corbyn and I don't think he can lead us to election victory in 2020." https://t.co/oAkAQNS8Vd

    LOL!
    Tells a lot about PBers knowledge of Labour politicians.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    The by-election people have been talking about will take place in Richmond - before the Mayor election.

    The Tories are about to do a U-turn and Goldsmith is pledge bound to resign being an MP if that happens.

    It might also suit him and the Tories. They wouldn't want discussions about Heathrow to dominate next May.

    How is accepting the recommendations of a commission set up to look into a question, when you said you would accept said recommendations, a U-turn?
    But Goldsmith has said categorically that he will resign if the Tory party policy changes on Heathrow
    Isn't the policy to accept the recommendation of the commission? Surely this is a much better policy than arbitrarily deciding to do something/not to do something.
    We have brains though, we are instantly suspicious of a commission whose apparent job is to choose the government's preferred option.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    AndyJS said:

    surbiton said:

    SeanT said:

    If true, this would explain the many strange anomalies surrounding that poor drowned child.

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/09/11/drowned-aylan-kurdis-father-accused-of-being-people-smuggler-at-helm-of-capsized-boat/

    Pathetic !
    No, what's pathetic is that you think we shouldn't bother to look into the facts of the case.
    Please do. Where did the judge refer to him as "corrupt" ?
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,994
    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
    I think you will find the Judge's report did not label him as a corrupt politician. It also did not find him as an extremist Jihadi.
    I thought he was dishing out money to his favourite causes in a bid to get re-elected? Sounds corrupt to me. I hope the Judge didn't call him an exemplar of British politics.
    How would you describe the act of Party's giving knighthood's to their donors ?
    Blairism?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,040

    DavidL said:

    fpt

    What do the Tories want to do about Corbyn? If he is so terrible for Labour wouldn't it be better that he stayed there? Tim Montgomerie thinks this is a chance to knock Labour off their morally superior perch. Perhaps, but that in itself is rather revealing.

    10 years ago when Cameron first came along it was all about how the Tories cared too and had no less of a moral conscience than Labour did, they just disagreed on means. It would appear they've given up on that and Osborne seems entirely comfortable in his ruthlessly cynical skin. It must grate them though to have to deal with Labour's sanctimony when the reality in their minds is that Labour is just as much in the moral gutter as they are. They're just two sides of the same opportunist coin who've chosen different paths.

    Montgomerie reckons politics could be about to get ugly. That has its downsides but parliamentary democracy is supposed to represent the broad views of the electorate. If the nation starts washing its dirty laundry in the House of Commons it might at least be rather more honest than the phoney civility of the 'right honourable member.'

    You are so far off the mark with Osborne. I was referred to this on here yesterday and it is a really interesting piece: http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2015/09/ascent-submarine-george-osborne-talks-jason-cowley

    As you would expect given that it is the New Statesman it is not uncritical but his determination to dominate the centre ground and his easy acceptance of a positive roll for the State shows what problems Labour have. And that is before they elect an intellectual muppet.
    hoorar for me!
    Sorry Scrapheap, my memory is not what it was (as best as I can recall).
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    Yorkcity said:

    The Bus Drivers son v The Billionaires son.
    The back stories are intresting.
    I think Sadiq Khan is a good choice for London.

    Obviously not for the disgusted from tunbridge wells on PB from the shires.

    As one from the shires, I don't give a flying feck. London is a foreign land - nothing wrong with that, but from this distance I can't tell the difference between Livingstone London and Boris London.
  • YorkcityYorkcity Posts: 4,382

    YORK CITY Anyone who says he will impose ethnic quotas is most definitely racist..says a lot about Mr KHAN..

    I imagine then you call a lot of people racist in the USA then ?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_quota

    Sadiq Khan has a personal success story , which will hopefully influence others from similar backgrounds.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,046
    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    surbiton said:

    RobD said:

    Speedy said:

    I think Khan will be a bad mayor, after the well known painful decade long mayoralty of Lutfur Rahman, I have a deep distrust towards local muslim politicians.

    I really don't think being Muslim made him a corrupt mayor.
    I think you will find the Judge's report did not label him as a corrupt politician. It also did not find him as an extremist Jihadi.
    I thought he was dishing out money to his favourite causes in a bid to get re-elected? Sounds corrupt to me. I hope the Judge didn't call him an exemplar of British politics.
    I didn't know the Police were involved. Please enlighten us. Corruption is a criminal offence.
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11578027/Lutfur-Rahman-Police-poised-to-re-open-inquiry-after-election-scandal.html

    Incidentally, wikipedia also states:

    He was re-elected at the 2014 mayoral election, but the result of this election was cancelled and declared null and void on 23 April 2015 when the Election Court officially reported Rahman to be personally guilty of corrupt or illegal practices, or both (electoral fraud) under the Representation of the People Act 1983.[2][3]

    Which sounds like the report did label him as a corrupt politician. Or one that engaged in illegal practices (or both.
Sign In or Register to comment.