Isn't there a period of 30 days after the actual default before the bailiffs are sent in? In other word, the Greeks having, sort of..... it wasn't a big vote, and in context the majority isn't big .... told the EU paymasters "can't pay; won't pay" we've another three weeks before the Germans move in to collect the Parthenon. Or what ever else they have in mind.
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1. Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Isn't there a period of 30 days after the actual default before the bailiffs are sent in? In other word, the Greeks having, sort of..... it wasn't a big vote, and in context the majority isn't big .... told the EU paymasters "can't pay; won't pay" we've another three weeks before the Germans move in to collect the Parthenon. Or what ever else they have in mind.
The IMF have said they are 'in arrears' - not yet in 'Default' - the more pressing worry is bank notes - unless the ECB extends liquidity most reckon the banks won't open on Tuesday.
The Germans simply have to do......nothing, and let events take their course.....
Isn't there a period of 30 days after the actual default before the bailiffs are sent in? In other word, the Greeks having, sort of..... it wasn't a big vote, and in context the majority isn't big .... told the EU paymasters "can't pay; won't pay" we've another three weeks before the Germans move in to collect the Parthenon. Or what ever else they have in mind.
The IMF have said they are 'in arrears' - not yet in 'Default' - the more pressing worry is bank notes - unless the ECB extends liquidity most reckon the banks won't open on Tuesday.
The Germans simply have to do......nothing, and let events take their course.....
I always thought that a significant part of the Greek problem was that substantial section of the wealthier Greeks paid almost no tax, either on their own incomes or their businesss'. How you can deal with that in a global economy I'm not sure. However, if most "small" people have already withdrawn their savings and either spent them or put them under the mattress closing the banks will simply mean that there's only a cash economy, so it'll be bigger busines that comes to a grinding halt. We already know there are medicine shortages because pharmacists can't pay multi-nationals.
Isn't there a period of 30 days after the actual default before the bailiffs are sent in? In other word, the Greeks having, sort of..... it wasn't a big vote, and in context the majority isn't big .... told the EU paymasters "can't pay; won't pay" we've another three weeks before the Germans move in to collect the Parthenon. Or what ever else they have in mind.
The IMF have said they are 'in arrears' - not yet in 'Default' - the more pressing worry is bank notes - unless the ECB extends liquidity most reckon the banks won't open on Tuesday.
The Germans simply have to do......nothing, and let events take their course.....
A failure to offer the Greeks a deal would be undemocratic! Even though no one else has taken a vote to say they must be given a new deal. Whoops.
Greece's options look to have been really crappy but they appear to have made their choice and given the dire warnings of other leaders, they gave made that choice with eyes open. So if they don't get a better deal, they will be out of line if say they must still be rescued and how not doing so is punishing them for their democratic choice. As they say, freedom includes the freedom to accept consequences, and having shown 2 fingers to the creditors, no one has to offer them jack squat now.
They still might, and that be the fairest or at least least worst option, but Greece have lost to claim betrayal if the don't.
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1. Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Doesn't feel like it........
They have to pretend not to leave the Euro, so how about something like this: - Default on all debts to overseas lenders. - Start issuing electronic IOUs, theoretically redeemable for Euros at some future date. - Make a law that wages, pensions and bank deposits are payable in IOUs. - Introduce an electronic payment system like the MPESA so that you can spend IOUs in shops. This also has the benefit of making transactions easier to tax.
The IOUs will immediately plummet in value, so in effect you'be just cut wages and welfare, not to mention a bank deposit haircut. What happens next is one of two things:
a) The economy recovers, you get a primary budget surplus, the IOUs start to look like they may actually be redeemable for Euros, and their value recovers. If things go well enough you ultimately cut a new deal with the lendors who get something back instead of nothing and either recapitalise the banks with normal Euros or let people bank with German banks instead.
b) The economy doesn't recover and the government is still spending more than it gets, so you just keep making up ever-devaluing IOUs forever.
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1. Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Doesn't feel like it........
They have to pretend not to leave the Euro, so how about something like this: - Default on all debts to overseas lenders. - Start issuing electronic IOUs, theoretically redeemable for Euros at some future date. - Make a law that wages, pensions and bank deposits are payable in IOUs. - Introduce an electronic payment system like the MPESA so that you can spend IOUs in shops. This also has the benefit of making transactions easier to tax.
The IOUs will immediately plummet in value, so in effect you'be just cut wages and welfare, not to mention a bank deposit haircut. What happens next is one of two things:
a) The economy recovers, you get a primary budget surplus, the IOUs start to look like they may actually be redeemable for Euros, and their value recovers. If things go well enough you ultimately cut a new deal with the lendors who get something back instead of nothing and either recapitalise the banks with normal Euros or let people bank with German banks instead.
b) The economy doesn't recover and the government is still spending more than it gets, so you just keep making up ever-devaluing IOUs forever.
Isn't there a period of 30 days after the actual default before the bailiffs are sent in? In other word, the Greeks having, sort of..... it wasn't a big vote, and in context the majority isn't big .... told the EU paymasters "can't pay; won't pay" we've another three weeks before the Germans move in to collect the Parthenon. Or what ever else they have in mind.
The IMF have said they are 'in arrears' - not yet in 'Default' - the more pressing worry is bank notes - unless the ECB extends liquidity most reckon the banks won't open on Tuesday.
The Germans simply have to do......nothing, and let events take their course.....
I always thought that a significant part of the Greek problem was that substantial section of the wealthier Greeks paid almost no tax, either on their own incomes or their businesss'. How you can deal with that in a global economy I'm not sure. However, if most "small" people have already withdrawn their savings and either spent them or put them under the mattress closing the banks will simply mean that there's only a cash economy, so it'll be bigger busines that comes to a grinding halt. We already know there are medicine shortages because pharmacists can't pay multi-nationals.
While a lot of Greeks (probably the wealthy, rather than the poor) have already withdrawn their savings from the Greek banks, there is still EUR130bn of deposits.
BTW, you are absolutely right about tax. The Greek government collects taxes equivalent to around about 32% of GDP. That is 5-10% less than anyone else in Europe. At the height of the Eurozone crisis, I saw a speech by former MEP John Stevens, who had the memorable line "If the Greeks paid as much taxes (as a proportion of income) as the Italians, their budget would be in balance. If they paid as much as the French, they would have a surplus."
I know little about finance and the internal workings of the EU, so can I thank everyone on the last couple of threads who have expressed views on what might happen. The views and counter-views of posters have been fairly illuminating.
I honestly thought politics was going to get boring for a few months ...
Reading Bloomberg this morning I saw the following line "Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis told Bloomberg on July 2 that the nation’s banks, shut and under capital controls for the past week, will open on July 7."
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1. Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Doesn't feel like it........
They have to pretend not to leave the Euro, so how about something like this: - Default on all debts to overseas lenders. - Start issuing electronic IOUs, theoretically redeemable for Euros at some future date. - Make a law that wages, pensions and bank deposits are payable in IOUs. - Introduce an electronic payment system like the MPESA so that you can spend IOUs in shops. This also has the benefit of making transactions easier to tax.
The IOUs will immediately plummet in value, so in effect you'be just cut wages and welfare, not to mention a bank deposit haircut. What happens next is one of two things:
a) The economy recovers, you get a primary budget surplus, the IOUs start to look like they may actually be redeemable for Euros, and their value recovers. If things go well enough you ultimately cut a new deal with the lendors who get something back instead of nothing and either recapitalise the banks with normal Euros or let people bank with German banks instead.
b) The economy doesn't recover and the government is still spending more than it gets, so you just keep making up ever-devaluing IOUs forever.
why not just call the IOUs iDrachma and have done with it?
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1. Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Doesn't feel like it........
They have to pretend not to leave the Euro, so how about something like this: - Default on all debts to overseas lenders. - Start issuing electronic IOUs, theoretically redeemable for Euros at some future date. - Make a law that wages, pensions and bank deposits are payable in IOUs. - Introduce an electronic payment system like the MPESA so that you can spend IOUs in shops. This also has the benefit of making transactions easier to tax.
The IOUs will immediately plummet in value, so in effect you'be just cut wages and welfare, not to mention a bank deposit haircut. What happens next is one of two things:
a) The economy recovers, you get a primary budget surplus, the IOUs start to look like they may actually be redeemable for Euros, and their value recovers. If things go well enough you ultimately cut a new deal with the lendors who get something back instead of nothing and either recapitalise the banks with normal Euros or let people bank with German banks instead.
b) The economy doesn't recover and the government is still spending more than it gets, so you just keep making up ever-devaluing IOUs forever.
why not just call the IOUs iDrachma and have done with it?
Because the Greek government lied to its people and told them that they would be able to stay in the Euro. Printing Drachma would make clear that lie.
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1. Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Doesn't feel like it........
They have to pretend not to leave the Euro, so how about something like this: - Default on all debts to overseas lenders. - Start issuing electronic IOUs, theoretically redeemable for Euros at some future date. - Make a law that wages, pensions and bank deposits are payable in IOUs. - Introduce an electronic payment system like the MPESA so that you can spend IOUs in shops. This also has the benefit of making transactions easier to tax.
The IOUs will immediately plummet in value, so in effect you'be just cut wages and welfare, not to mention a bank deposit haircut. What happens next is one of two things:
a) The economy recovers, you get a primary budget surplus, the IOUs start to look like they may actually be redeemable for Euros, and their value recovers. If things go well enough you ultimately cut a new deal with the lendors who get something back instead of nothing and either recapitalise the banks with normal Euros or let people bank with German banks instead.
b) The economy doesn't recover and the government is still spending more than it gets, so you just keep making up ever-devaluing IOUs forever.
why not just call the IOUs iDrachma and have done with it?
Because the Greek government lied to its people and told them that they would be able to stay in the Euro. Printing Drachma would make clear that lie.
Might they also want to keep the name 'Drachma' (either by itself or as a 'New Drachma') for a more stable period? You have the IOU system to take the immediate pain, and introduce the new currency later?
Could you devalue (slightly, or a lot) at each switchover?
(or tweeted to be precise): Well done to the people of Greece. European leaders should now respond constructively to the democratic voice of the Greek people.
How much Scottish tax payers money is the SNP Foreign Affairs spokesman proposing they send?
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1. Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Doesn't feel like it........
They have to pretend not to leave the Euro, so how about something like this: - Default on all debts to overseas lenders. - Start issuing electronic IOUs, theoretically redeemable for Euros at some future date. - Make a law that wages, pensions and bank deposits are payable in IOUs. - Introduce an electronic payment system like the MPESA so that you can spend IOUs in shops. This also has the benefit of making transactions easier to tax.
The IOUs will immediately plummet in value, so in effect you'be just cut wages and welfare, not to mention a bank deposit haircut. What happens next is one of two things:
a) The economy recovers, you get a primary budget surplus, the IOUs start to look like they may actually be redeemable for Euros, and their value recovers. If things go well enough you ultimately cut a new deal with the lendors who get something back instead of nothing and either recapitalise the banks with normal Euros or let people bank with German banks instead.
b) The economy doesn't recover and the government is still spending more than it gets, so you just keep making up ever-devaluing IOUs forever.
why not just call the IOUs iDrachma and have done with it?
Because the Greek government lied to its people and told them that they would be able to stay in the Euro. Printing Drachma would make clear that lie.
It's going to get nasty when the banks remain closed, and the EU doesn't turn the money taps back on.
BTW, you are absolutely right about tax. The Greek government collects taxes equivalent to around about 32% of GDP. That is 5-10% less than anyone else in Europe. At the height of the Eurozone crisis, I saw a speech by former MEP John Stevens, who had the memorable line "If the Greeks paid as much taxes (as a proportion of income) as the Italians, their budget would be in balance. If they paid as much as the French, they would have a surplus."
This is OK as long as you don't believe in that ol Laffer curve
BTW, you are absolutely right about tax. The Greek government collects taxes equivalent to around about 32% of GDP. That is 5-10% less than anyone else in Europe. At the height of the Eurozone crisis, I saw a speech by former MEP John Stevens, who had the memorable line "If the Greeks paid as much taxes (as a proportion of income) as the Italians, their budget would be in balance. If they paid as much as the French, they would have a surplus."
This is OK as long as you don't believe in that ol Laffer curve
Well, it's OK as long as you don't believe the top of the laffer curve is below 32%, and only crazy people believe that.
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1. Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Doesn't feel like it........
They have to pretend not to leave the Euro, so how about something like this: - Default on all debts to overseas lenders. - Start issuing electronic IOUs, theoretically redeemable for Euros at some future date. - Make a law that wages, pensions and bank deposits are payable in IOUs. - Introduce an electronic payment system like the MPESA so that you can spend IOUs in shops. This also has the benefit of making transactions easier to tax.
The IOUs will immediately plummet in value, so in effect you'be just cut wages and welfare, not to mention a bank deposit haircut. What happens next is one of two things:
a) The economy recovers, you get a primary budget surplus, the IOUs start to look like they may actually be redeemable for Euros, and their value recovers. If things go well enough you ultimately cut a new deal with the lendors who get something back instead of nothing and either recapitalise the banks with normal Euros or let people bank with German banks instead.
b) The economy doesn't recover and the government is still spending more than it gets, so you just keep making up ever-devaluing IOUs forever.
why not just call the IOUs iDrachma and have done with it?
Because the Greek government lied to its people and told them that they would be able to stay in the Euro. Printing Drachma would make clear that lie.
Right, mainly for that reason. But also because in theory things might get better and they might want to resume normal Euro membership. If they officially left then tried to rejoin they'd probably find the requirements more strictly enforced than the last time around...
BTW, you are absolutely right about tax. The Greek government collects taxes equivalent to around about 32% of GDP. That is 5-10% less than anyone else in Europe. At the height of the Eurozone crisis, I saw a speech by former MEP John Stevens, who had the memorable line "If the Greeks paid as much taxes (as a proportion of income) as the Italians, their budget would be in balance. If they paid as much as the French, they would have a surplus."
This is OK as long as you don't believe in that ol Laffer curve
Well, it's OK as long as you don't believe the top of the laffer curve is below 32%, and only crazy people believe that.
My guess is that the curve would be relative to the status quo, not some absolute figure
(or tweeted to be precise): Well done to the people of Greece. European leaders should now respond constructively to the democratic voice of the Greek people.
How much Scottish tax payers money is the SNP Foreign Affairs spokesman proposing they send?
People don't understand debt.
Debt and saving are opposite sides of the same coin. They are both mechanisms for the time transfer of work. Somebody who borrows is one who wishes to consume today, and someone who saves is one who wishes to consumer tomorrow.
When we talk of about debt forgiveness, let us be honest and call it savings destruction. The Greek government wishes to reduce the savings of millions of people.
Thomas Pikettey, for once, is correct that Greece does need debt relief.
What it cannot have is debt relief without reform. And what the Greeks have voted for is debt relief without reform (or, austerity, as some like to call it).
Apart from the plight of the Greeks, the domestic political ramifications will be interesting.
We have Salmond, Blanchflower and others cheering the Greeks on and calling for EU 'flexibility' (who pays for this flexibility generally unspecified, except for Blanchflower, who says the Germans should pay, without resorting to a referendum, presumably) and all the other forces of 'Anti-Austerity'
And then we have the rest, who have generally been more circumspect in their pronouncements.
As Ben Goldacre frequently observes 'I think you'll find its a bit more complicated than that.....
BTW if you believe the scenario I've sketched out there's great value betting on Greece staying in the Eurozone. De-facto they'd have sort-of left, but officialy they'd still be in, so it's hard to see the bookies settling it as Grexit. (But check the wording...)
(or tweeted to be precise): Well done to the people of Greece. European leaders should now respond constructively to the democratic voice of the Greek people.
How much Scottish tax payers money is the SNP Foreign Affairs spokesman proposing they send?
The Greek government wishes to reduce the savings of millions of people.
And not Greeks, if they can avoid it. (But they can't)
We have Salmond, Blanchflower and others cheering the Greeks on and calling for EU 'flexibility' (who pays for this flexibility generally unspecified, except for Blanchflower, who says the Germans should pay, without resorting to a referendum, presumably) and all the other forces of 'Anti-Austerity'
It will be amusing to watch the Greek response were Merkel to ask for Germany's view in a bailout referendum.
It's going to get nasty when the banks remain closed, and the EU doesn't turn the money taps back on.
Yep and I don't think the banks can be opened. Greece has moved to an all cash economy and doesn't have enough notes to satisfy current demand... At some point this week there will be nothing left to stock the ATMs. There is no money left will for once be physically true.
Even if the ELA allowed the banks to borrow more money (and somehow I doubt the banks are solvent enough for that to happen) the cash withdrawals are such that further withdrawals will eventually make the banks insolvent..
The ironic thing is that the above would be true regardless of what the vote was.... The problem with a No vote is that people are going to blame Varoufakis and co..
We have Salmond, Blanchflower and others cheering the Greeks on and calling for EU 'flexibility' (who pays for this flexibility generally unspecified, except for Blanchflower, who says the Germans should pay, without resorting to a referendum, presumably) and all the other forces of 'Anti-Austerity'
It would be amusing to watch the Greek response were Merkel to ask for Germany's view in a bailout referendum.
This is SindyRef revisited.
Up until the vote, the only people whose opinion mattered were the Greeks'
After the vote, their opinion is largely irrelevant. Now other people decide.
It's going to get nasty when the banks remain closed, and the EU doesn't turn the money taps back on.
Yep and I don't think the banks can be opened. Greece has moved to an all cash economy and doesn't have enough notes to satisfy current demand... At some point this week there will be nothing left to stock the ATMs. There is no money left will for once be physically true.
Even if the ELA allowed the banks to borrow more money (and somehow I doubt the banks are solvent enough for that to happen) the cash withdrawals are such that further withdrawals will eventually make the banks insolvent..
The ironic thing is that the above would be true regardless of what the vote was.... The problem with a No vote is that people are going to blame Varoufakis and co..
Well, since they've made promises to the Greek people that they can't deliver, it will be fully deserved. The cash machines will run for about half a day, and then that's it. Empty.
We have Salmond, Blanchflower and others cheering the Greeks on and calling for EU 'flexibility' (who pays for this flexibility generally unspecified, except for Blanchflower, who says the Germans should pay, without resorting to a referendum, presumably) and all the other forces of 'Anti-Austerity'
It would be amusing to watch the Greek response were Merkel to ask for Germany's view in a bailout referendum.
This is SindyRef revisited.
Up until the vote, the only people whose opinion mattered were the Greeks'
After the vote, their opinion is largely irrelevant. Now other people decide.
so the scots should have voted for independence, if they wanted their opinions to be relevant?
The fantasy that Tsipras and others sold the Greek people will unravel very quickly. All the creditors have to do is wait. The cap on ELA will remain. That means no more Euros for the Greek banks. That means their banks remain shut.
The ability to buy exports including food is limited to the amount of euros currently in the Greek system. Shortages will grow from local difficulties to serious this week. More people will leave. A lot more people. People who have probably not paid as much tax as they should in the past. They will pay none in the future.
Syriza have led their people over the cliff. It won't take long for them to hit the bottom. And all the creditors can do at the moment is wait and prepare their own systems for inevitable default by the Greeks. The idea that they will advance more money to break the fall is frankly absurd.
It's going to get nasty when the banks remain closed, and the EU doesn't turn the money taps back on.
Yep and I don't think the banks can be opened. Greece has moved to an all cash economy and doesn't have enough notes to satisfy current demand... At some point this week there will be nothing left to stock the ATMs. There is no money left will for once be physically true.
Even if the ELA allowed the banks to borrow more money (and somehow I doubt the banks are solvent enough for that to happen) the cash withdrawals are such that further withdrawals will eventually make the banks insolvent..
The ironic thing is that the above would be true regardless of what the vote was.... The problem with a No vote is that people are going to blame Varoufakis and co..
And it seems Varoufakis has gone which seems to be at the behest of everyone on the other side of the table...
It's going to get nasty when the banks remain closed, and the EU doesn't turn the money taps back on.
Yep and I don't think the banks can be opened. Greece has moved to an all cash economy and doesn't have enough notes to satisfy current demand... At some point this week there will be nothing left to stock the ATMs. There is no money left will for once be physically true.
Even if the ELA allowed the banks to borrow more money (and somehow I doubt the banks are solvent enough for that to happen) the cash withdrawals are such that further withdrawals will eventually make the banks insolvent..
The ironic thing is that the above would be true regardless of what the vote was.... The problem with a No vote is that people are going to blame Varoufakis and co..
And it seems Varoufakis has gone which seems to be at the behest of everyone on the other side of the table...
The idea that the Greeks think this is a sufficient step to encourage the other EZ members to even return to the table is yet another example of their shocking naivety.
How either Varafoukis or Tsipras can think that merely getting rid of one card-carrying lunatic is going to make negotiations easier is beyond me. That implies that there are going to be negotiations. With Spain hanging over the heads of Europe, that does not seem to me to be at all likely.
I could be entirely wrong but this is my guess on what will happen next:
1) Today, Merkel simply says that there are no further negotiations with the Greek government
2) Tomorrow, every Greek bank collapses;
3) Wednesday, the Greek government has to fire up the printing press. At that point, whether officially or not, it has left the Euro;
4) Thursday, the new currency comes under attack;
5) Friday, the Greek government officially announces default;
6) Saturday, the riots start.
That seems the likely order of events, although the timescale may be completely wrong.
The reason I believe this is because the alternative is as follows:
1) Merkel gives in and rescues the Greek economy;
2) The Spanish government collapses under pressure from the far left and a new anti-austerity party comes to power demanding the same deal for Spain;
3) Because that is unaffordable, the euro collapses and takes the world economy with it.
Since Merkel is essentially a pragmatist, I'm pretty sure she will sacrifice the Greeks - and probably take delight in doing down Tsipras - in order to save the rest.
What was that passage in the Bible about 'if an eye offend you, pluck it out - for it is better to go through life with one eye, than spend an eternity in hell with two'?
I thought he said he would resign if there was a yes vote. Looks like he was planning to go regardless of the result.
I think Tsipras has sacked him - at the behest of the EU. Tsipras is now in the pocket of the EU and I'm not sure how popular he'll remain after the deal the EU decide to give him sinks in to the Greek people.
How either Varafoukis or Tsipras can think that merely getting rid of one card-carrying lunatic is going to make negotiations easier is beyond me. That implies that there are going to be negotiations. With Spain hanging over the heads of Europe, that does not seem to me to be at all likely.
I could be entirely wrong but this is my guess on what will happen next:
1) Today, Merkel simply says that there are no further negotiations with the Greek government
2) Tomorrow, every Greek bank collapses;
3) Wednesday, the Greek government has to fire up the printing press. At that point, whether officially or not, it has left the Euro;
4) Thursday, the new currency comes under attack;
5) Friday, the Greek government officially announces default;
6) Saturday, the riots start.
That seems the likely order of events, although the timescale may be completely wrong.
The reason I believe this is because the alternative is as follows:
1) Merkel gives in and rescues the Greek economy;
2) The Spanish government collapses under pressure from the far left and a new anti-austerity party comes to power demanding the same deal for Spain;
3) Because that is unaffordable, the euro collapses and takes the world economy with it.
Since Merkel is essentially a pragmatist, I'm pretty sure she will sacrifice the Greeks - and probably take delight in doing down Tsipras - in order to save the rest.
What was that passage in the Bible about 'if an eye offend you, pluck it out - for it is better to go through life with one eye, than spend an eternity in hell with two'?
I doubt that much of this will happen. The EU doesn't do hard candy - we're gonna get a lot of fudge but essentially the Greeks are gonna be shafted amidst a cloud of candy floss.
I doubt that much of this will happen. The EU doesn't do hard candy - we're gonna get a lot of fudge but essentially the Greeks are gonna be shafted amidst a cloud of candy floss.
True, the EU doesn't. But this is no longer up to the EU. That option went with the no vote, because it would take too long to put together a different rescue package through the usual channels (about three weeks - Greece needs hard cash within 48 hours).
Therefore, the only person who can save the Greek economy now and prevent a Grexit is Merkel, and I'm pretty sure she won't do it. Leaving aside the appalling behaviour Tsipras and Varoufakis have exhibited towards her, she'd never carry the German government and people with her. Also, she will be thinking of the wider consequences of being too nice to people who have decided that childish abuse and denial of their own complicity in the crisis is the way to make their creditors pay attention to them.
And unlike the EU, Merkel can and does play hardball. Look at the way she treated the Social Democrats under the first grand coalition if you don't believe me.
I doubt that much of this will happen. The EU doesn't do hard candy - we're gonna get a lot of fudge but essentially the Greeks are gonna be shafted amidst a cloud of candy floss.
True, the EU doesn't. But this is no longer up to the EU. That option went with the no vote, because it would take too long to put together a different rescue package through the usual channels (about three weeks - Greece needs hard cash within 48 hours).
Therefore, the only person who can save the Greek economy now and prevent a Grexit is Merkel, and I'm pretty sure she won't do it. Leaving aside the appalling behaviour Tsipras and Varoufakis have exhibited towards her, she'd never carry the German government and people with her. Also, she will be thinking of the wider consequences of being too nice to people who have decided that childish abuse and denial of their own complicity in the crisis is the way to make their creditors pay attention to them.
And unlike the EU, Merkel can and does play hardball. Look at the way she treated the Social Democrats under the first grand coalition if you don't believe me.
The immediate critical decision is for Draghi and the ECB and they will not act overtly and politically to deliver the coup de grace. The banks will get the emergency facility they need until Greece accepts a deal essentially identical to the one they voted yesterday to reject. Tsipras may, or may not, survive when that reality sinks in.
The immediate critical decision is for Draghi and the ECB and they will not act overtly and politically to deliver the coup de grace. The banks will get the emergency facility they need until Greece accepts a deal essentially identical to the one they voted yesterday to reject. Tsipras may, or may not, survive when that reality sinks in.
The problem is that if they bail out the Greek banks - which are bankrupt, in the sense they no longer have sufficient assets to cover their liabilities - they are breaking the EU's rules and therefore they would be acting politically, and indeed potentially be open to legal challenge in the courts. I think this is something Tsipras doesn't quite grasp. So again, we are back to a major politician backing them.
This is quite an interesting analysis, although it's a lot more optimistic(!) than my own:
I doubt that much of this will happen. The EU doesn't do hard candy - we're gonna get a lot of fudge but essentially the Greeks are gonna be shafted amidst a cloud of candy floss.
True, the EU doesn't. But this is no longer up to the EU. That option went with the no vote, because it would take too long to put together a different rescue package through the usual channels (about three weeks - Greece needs hard cash within 48 hours).
Therefore, the only person who can save the Greek economy now and prevent a Grexit is Merkel, and I'm pretty sure she won't do it. Leaving aside the appalling behaviour Tsipras and Varoufakis have exhibited towards her, she'd never carry the German government and people with her. Also, she will be thinking of the wider consequences of being too nice to people who have decided that childish abuse and denial of their own complicity in the crisis is the way to make their creditors pay attention to them.
And unlike the EU, Merkel can and does play hardball. Look at the way she treated the Social Democrats under the first grand coalition if you don't believe me.
The immediate critical decision is for Draghi and the ECB and they will not act overtly and politically to deliver the coup de grace. The banks will get the emergency facility they need until Greece accepts a deal essentially identical to the one they voted yesterday to reject. Tsipras may, or may not, survive when that reality sinks in.
That's about the most plausible suggestion so far this morning.
It would look politically awful to everyone if Greece is thrown under the bus for the decision of their people, so we will see a load more fudge that at least allows the banks to give the impression of being open and something approaching normality to resume.
The immediate critical decision is for Draghi and the ECB and they will not act overtly and politically to deliver the coup de grace. The banks will get the emergency facility they need until Greece accepts a deal essentially identical to the one they voted yesterday to reject. Tsipras may, or may not, survive when that reality sinks in.
The problem is that if they bail out the Greek banks - which are bankrupt, in the sense they no longer have sufficient assets to cover their liabilities - they are breaking the EU's rules and therefore they would be acting politically, and indeed potentially be open to legal challenge in the courts. I think this is something Tsipras doesn't quite grasp. So again, we are back to a major politician backing them.
This is quite an interesting analysis, although it's a lot more optimistic(!) than my own:
The ECB will simply be acting temporarily - fudging rather than breaking the rules. If you look at the markets the reaction on shares, FX and bond rates is really quite muted so far. I think it will remain so - unless Tsipras regrows a pair and precipitates Grexit himself. The EU will not eject the Greeks - they will go for a fudge on basically the same terms as the Greeks rejected last week. Tsipras' decision to let Varoufakis go suggests he is ready for a deal.
The EU will not eject the Greeks - they will go for a fudge on basically the same terms as the Greeks rejected last week. Tsipras' decision to let Varoufakis go suggests he is ready for a deal.
We will see. I would like to think you are right, if only for the sake of the Greek people. At the moment, it looks as though they need Oxfam rather than the IMF. But it wasn't just Varafoukis who was the problem, it was and is Tsipras. The man is deeply loathed outside Greece and after the last few weeks has all the credibility of a cat sitting next to an empty cream bowl. So as long as he is there, I cannot see negotiations happening. As I cannot see the ECB riding to the rescue either, I am therefore expecting Grexit this week.
And I think the EU (again, here we're talking about the political not economic leaders) will take the view that they are not ejecting the Greeks - rather, that the Greeks have ejected themselves.
Like I say, I could be and indeed hope I am wrong. It's also true the EU tends to deal in the art of the possible. But I suspect that raw emotion will outweigh principles in this case.
The EU will not eject the Greeks - they will go for a fudge on basically the same terms as the Greeks rejected last week. Tsipras' decision to let Varoufakis go suggests he is ready for a deal.
We will see. I would like to think you are right, if only for the sake of the Greek people. At the moment, it looks as though they need Oxfam rather than the IMF. But it wasn't just Varafoukis who was the problem, it was and is Tsipras. The man is deeply loathed outside Greece and after the last few weeks has all the credibility of a cat sitting next to an empty cream bowl. So as long as he is there, I cannot see negotiations happening. As I cannot see the ECB riding to the rescue either, I am therefore expecting Grexit this week.
And I think the EU (again, here we're talking about the political not economic leaders) will take the view that they are not ejecting the Greeks - rather, that the Greeks have ejected themselves.
Like I say, I could be and indeed hope I am wrong. It's also true the EU tends to deal in the art of the possible. But I suspect that raw emotion will outweigh principles in this case.
Any further negotiations take time and a framework that does not exist.
So events in Greece will overtake any talks. I think the cash machines will be empty by lunchtime.
The EU will not eject the Greeks - they will go for a fudge on basically the same terms as the Greeks rejected last week. Tsipras' decision to let Varoufakis go suggests he is ready for a deal.
We will see. I would like to think you are right, if only for the sake of the Greek people. At the moment, it looks as though they need Oxfam rather than the IMF. But it wasn't just Varafoukis who was the problem, it was and is Tsipras. The man is deeply loathed outside Greece and after the last few weeks has all the credibility of a cat sitting next to an empty cream bowl. So as long as he is there, I cannot see negotiations happening. As I cannot see the ECB riding to the rescue either, I am therefore expecting Grexit this week.
And I think the EU (again, here we're talking about the political not economic leaders) will take the view that they are not ejecting the Greeks - rather, that the Greeks have ejected themselves.
Like I say, I could be and indeed hope I am wrong. It's also true the EU tends to deal in the art of the possible. But I suspect that raw emotion will outweigh principles in this case.
The Greeks are betting that Merkel will ignore the increasingly strident views of German banks , businesses and voters. It's hard to see that happening.
I doubt that much of this will happen. The EU doesn't do hard candy - we're gonna get a lot of fudge but essentially the Greeks are gonna be shafted amidst a cloud of candy floss.
True, the EU doesn't. But this is no longer up to the EU. That option went with the no vote, because it would take too long to put together a different rescue package through the usual channels (about three weeks - Greece needs hard cash within 48 hours).
Therefore, the only person who can save the Greek economy now and prevent a Grexit is Merkel, and I'm pretty sure she won't do it. Leaving aside the appalling behaviour Tsipras and Varoufakis have exhibited towards her, she'd never carry the German government and people with her. Also, she will be thinking of the wider consequences of being too nice to people who have decided that childish abuse and denial of their own complicity in the crisis is the way to make their creditors pay attention to them.
And unlike the EU, Merkel can and does play hardball. Look at the way she treated the Social Democrats under the first grand coalition if you don't believe me.
The immediate critical decision is for Draghi and the ECB and they will not act overtly and politically to deliver the coup de grace. The banks will get the emergency facility they need until Greece accepts a deal essentially identical to the one they voted yesterday to reject. Tsipras may, or may not, survive when that reality sinks in.
That's about the most plausible suggestion so far this morning.
It would look politically awful to everyone if Greece is thrown under the bus for the decision of their people, so we will see a load more fudge that at least allows the banks to give the impression of being open and something approaching normality to resume.
That seems plausible. The rest of Europe, despite what Greece and people like Caroline Lucas have been saying, have an obligation to do a deal now Greece has voted they want a new one, but the Greeks were probably right that having shown their people are clearly of that view, to crush that view immediately and catastrophically will make the eu and others look bad, and looking bad seems to be the one thing they don't like (they don't mind looking arrogant that's for sure), so something will be fudged for a couple of weeks at least, possibly longer depending how blatant they will change tack.
Laughing at the bunch of prematurely senile middle aged accountants and over educated toffs on here being resolutely unable to get their heads round some actual humanity doing real human stuff.
< That seems plausible. The rest of Europe, despite what Greece and people like Caroline Lucas have been saying, have an obligation to do a deal now Greece has voted they want a new one, but the Greeks were probably right that having shown their people are clearly of that view, to crush that view immediately and catastrophically will make the eu and others look bad, and looking bad seems to be the one thing they don't like (they don't mind looking arrogant that's for sure), so something will be fudged for a couple of weeks at least, possibly longer depending how blatant they will change tack.
I'm puzzled. Do you mean, 'do not have an obligation...' because otherwise that comment doesn't make sense to me (it may be Monday morning exhaustion, of course)!
1. The creditors hold the cards now. How they respond to the vote determines what happens next.
2. The ECB will not cut ELA, kill the banks and force an exit until a political decision is made. That might be tomorrow or it might not.
3 . This could end very quickly or it could drag out until the 20th July and a missed ECB payment.
4. Creditors clearly divided - IMF vs many on debt restructuring. France & Italy pushing for a deal, Germany/Eastern Europe more hardline.
5. Greek government sounded more conciliatory last night, less bombastic nationalism than in recent days.
6. Again - creditors are weighing up economic costs of Greek exit vs political costs of a Greek win. That's the choice they have to make.
Two countries: Venezuela, Spain. A name from the past: Admiral Byng
Do you mean the last chap executed for 'failing to engage the enemy', 1750s? That decision was widely considered wrong, against almost all public interest, and IIRC, brought about a change in the law?
Laughing at the bunch of prematurely senile middle aged accountants and over educated toffs on here being resolutely unable to get their heads round some actual humanity doing real human stuff.
The Greeks are going to have their work cut out printing money - Faisal Islam:
Greece has only ever printed €5, €10, €20. Only DE, AT, LU ever had plates for €200, €500 (via @TheDefaultLine )
Never mind the plates. Do they have sufficient stocks of the specialist paper required for banknote production?
GIven that they will have the prefix Y, they might as well print them on a string from bog-roll. People won't want Greek Euros in their wallets by the middle of this week I predict....
< That seems plausible. The rest of Europe, despite what Greece and people like Caroline Lucas have been saying, have an obligation to do a deal now Greece has voted they want a new one, but the Greeks were probably right that having shown their people are clearly of that view, to crush that view immediately and catastrophically will make the eu and others look bad, and looking bad seems to be the one thing they don't like (they don't mind looking arrogant that's for sure), so something will be fudged for a couple of weeks at least, possibly longer depending how blatant they will change tack.
I'm puzzled. Do you mean, 'do not have an obligation...' because otherwise that comment doesn't make sense to me (it may be Monday morning exhaustion, of course)!
Yes, I did mean 'do not have an obligation'. As some earlier posts show I've been up and down since very early, and am thoroughly exhausted. And now off to work!
Laughing at the bunch of prematurely senile middle aged accountants and over educated toffs on here being resolutely unable to get their heads round some actual humanity doing real human stuff.
It's more than a bit sad that there is somebody on here so emotionally disturbed that he(?) finds the collapse of an entire country on the basis of a lie they were told in a referendum campaign to be funny.
Of course, the childish abuse is par for the course from Labour propagandists these days...in a way, having benefitted hugely from those decent middle-ground old Labour types who taught me when I was growing up in an ex-mining area, people who cared about and dedicated their lives to helping the poor, that's even sadder.
The jealousy and spite about your lack of success and inadequate education are fortunately not insoluble, however. The Open University does excellent courses, but be warned they are academically rigorous. Alternatively, if you live in London, Birkbeck might be able to help.
(or tweeted to be precise): Well done to the people of Greece. European leaders should now respond constructively to the democratic voice of the Greek people.
How much Scottish tax payers money is the SNP Foreign Affairs spokesman proposing they send?
People don't understand debt.
Debt and saving are opposite sides of the same coin. They are both mechanisms for the time transfer of work. Somebody who borrows is one who wishes to consume today, and someone who saves is one who wishes to consumer tomorrow.
When we talk of about debt forgiveness, let us be honest and call it savings destruction. The Greek government wishes to reduce the savings of millions of people.
= the simple truth that many of the people, and their leaders, will never, ever get. The latter perhaps wilfully so.
Plus was loving the neck and neck/tctc opinion polls prior to the referendum result.
As always on PB, the neoliberal view seems to have traction today. The Greeks have frankly made the rational vote. Either way, in 10 years time, they are likely to be better off for voting no. The alternative was endless pain.
The Greeks are going to have their work cut out printing money - Faisal Islam:
Greece has only ever printed €5, €10, €20. Only DE, AT, LU ever had plates for €200, €500 (via @TheDefaultLine )
Never mind the plates. Do they have sufficient stocks of the specialist paper required for banknote production?
One assumes (bad idea sometimes, I know!) that the ECB must directly control at least some aspect of the security of Euro note production, whether it be be the watermarking, embossing or numbering of the notes.
Anyone know definitively if Greece can actually print Euros on their own, because if so someone at the ECB must surely be in a whole load of trouble!
[Admiral Byng:] Do you mean the last chap executed for 'failing to engage the enemy', 1750s? That decision was widely considered wrong, against almost all public interest, and IIRC, brought about a change in the law?
Not 'failing to engage the enemy' - failing to do his utmost in the presence of the enemy. There is a difference. The first remained - indeed, I think remains - a court-martial offence, because it implied cowardice.
The second was so difficult to work out that it was never actually successfully prosecuted again, although I think Robert Calder was charged with it after his engagement with Villeneuve in 1805.
As I recall - I haven't checked - Byng attacked a group of ships but then backed off due to an adverse tide and let some of them get away. He was therefore accused of having failed to press the attack when he should, found guilty, and shot.
The immediate critical decision is for Draghi and the ECB and they will not act overtly and politically to deliver the coup de grace. The banks will get the emergency facility they need until Greece accepts a deal essentially identical to the one they voted yesterday to reject. Tsipras may, or may not, survive when that reality sinks in.
The problem is that if they bail out the Greek banks - which are bankrupt, in the sense they no longer have sufficient assets to cover their liabilities - they are breaking the EU's rules and therefore they would be acting politically, and indeed potentially be open to legal challenge in the courts. I think this is something Tsipras doesn't quite grasp. So again, we are back to a major politician backing them.
This is quite an interesting analysis, although it's a lot more optimistic(!) than my own:
The ECB will simply be acting temporarily - fudging rather than breaking the rules. If you look at the markets the reaction on shares, FX and bond rates is really quite muted so far. I think it will remain so - unless Tsipras regrows a pair and precipitates Grexit himself. The EU will not eject the Greeks - they will go for a fudge on basically the same terms as the Greeks rejected last week. Tsipras' decision to let Varoufakis go suggests he is ready for a deal.
Exactly what I have been saying all along.
At the moment the likes of Merkel will be desperately trying to fudge a compromise that looks from the outside like they haven't done exactly that.
Tsipras has played them all at their own game and made them look foolish.
< That seems plausible. The rest of Europe, despite what Greece and people like Caroline Lucas have been saying, have an obligation to do a deal now Greece has voted they want a new one, but the Greeks were probably right that having shown their people are clearly of that view, to crush that view immediately and catastrophically will make the eu and others look bad, and looking bad seems to be the one thing they don't like (they don't mind looking arrogant that's for sure), so something will be fudged for a couple of weeks at least, possibly longer depending how blatant they will change tack.
I'm puzzled. Do you mean, 'do not have an obligation...' because otherwise that comment doesn't make sense to me (it may be Monday morning exhaustion, of course)!
Yes, I did mean 'do not have an obligation'. As some earlier posts show I've been up and down since very early, and am thoroughly exhausted. And now off to work!
Venezuela isn't going to the IMF any time soon either (predictions of Venezuela default have being going on for 15 years, wishful thinking).
Not sure that Venezuela is a good model to copy!
We are seeing what happens when the likes of Owen Jones form a government of a country.
What we are seeing Is the twilight of democracy. As capital concentrates in fewer and fewer hands (two generations ago half the world's wealth was owned by the richest 10%, to-day it's the richest 1%, in 30-40 years it'll be the richest 0.1%).
Still, don't worry guys. Just ratchet up the abuse of those who disagree with you.
Laughing at the bunch of prematurely senile middle aged accountants and over educated toffs on here being resolutely unable to get their heads round some actual humanity doing real human stuff.
It's more than a bit sad that there is somebody on here so emotionally disturbed that he(?) finds the collapse of an entire country on the basis of a lie they were told in a referendum campaign to be funny.
Of course, the childish abuse is par for the course from Labour propagandists these days...in a way, having benefitted hugely from those decent middle-ground old Labour types who taught me when I was growing up in an ex-mining area, people who cared about and dedicated their lives to helping the poor, that's even sadder.
The jealousy and spite about your lack of success and inadequate education are fortunately not insoluble, however. The Open University does excellent courses, but be warned they are academically rigorous. Alternatively, if you live in London, Birkbeck might be able to help.
I'm not a labour supporter or propagandist. Just enjoying doing research into the fascinating state of the dysfunctional right-wing mind for a book. I'm perfectly well educated thanks. Just stating that having been hothoused into the right university via the usual privileged channels does not in itself make one intelligent, as so many contributions on here prove.
1. The creditors hold the cards now. How they respond to the vote determines what happens next.
2. The ECB will not cut ELA, kill the banks and force an exit until a political decision is made. That might be tomorrow or it might not.
3 . This could end very quickly or it could drag out until the 20th July and a missed ECB payment.
4. Creditors clearly divided - IMF vs many on debt restructuring. France & Italy pushing for a deal, Germany/Eastern Europe more hardline.
5. Greek government sounded more conciliatory last night, less bombastic nationalism than in recent days.
6. Again - creditors are weighing up economic costs of Greek exit vs political costs of a Greek win. That's the choice they have to make.
Two countries: Venezuela, Spain. A name from the past: Admiral Byng
Do you mean the last chap executed for 'failing to engage the enemy', 1750s? That decision was widely considered wrong, against almost all public interest, and IIRC, brought about a change in the law?
Byng is remembered in the famous phrase, "pour encourager les autres":
Byng's execution was satirized by Voltaire in his novel Candide. In Portsmouth, Candide witnesses the execution of an officer by firing squad; and is told that "in this country, it is good to kill an admiral from time to time, in order to encourage the others" (Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres).
As always on PB, the neoliberal view seems to have traction today. The Greeks have frankly made the rational vote. Either way, in 10 years time, they are likely to be better off for voting no. The alternative was endless pain.
I think both alternatives represent long-term pain. The question was one of rescue to faintly mitigate the consequences or total collapse. Maybe in ten years, as you say, they will be better off. But it may well not feel that way.
The ECB could come up with the cash and delay repayments - if they were allowed to take over the Greek economy - that is what administrators do when they take over a bank defaulting company.
The people who celebrated with their hearts last night will have woken up to the same problems this morning.
As always on PB, the neoliberal view seems to have traction today. The Greeks have frankly made the rational vote. Either way, in 10 years time, they are likely to be better off for voting no. The alternative was endless pain.
The options they were presented with were very poor, I don't know how I'd have chosen in their circumstances and either way a lot pain was to follow. That said, the rhetoric of the Greek government in presenting a vote to in essence continue negotiations as somehow binding on the other parties to follow suit, had the rare effect of being more annoying than the arrogant threats of the EU. Whether negotiations do now follow doesn't even change that, as it's still amazingly nonsensical to suggest, as they have, that not doing what Greece wants is undemocratic.
I've no wish for things to get worse for the Greeks, though in the short term that seems unavoidable and this time they cannot blame anyone for taking this path, right or wrong, but I almost agreeing would be amusing for the other parties to delay any action until referendums of their own. That's the only way for them to follow the will of the relevant people after all.
1. The creditors hold the cards now. How they respond to the vote determines what happens next.
2. The ECB will not cut ELA, kill the banks and force an exit until a political decision is made. That might be tomorrow or it might not.
3 . This could end very quickly or it could drag out until the 20th July and a missed ECB payment.
4. Creditors clearly divided - IMF vs many on debt restructuring. France & Italy pushing for a deal, Germany/Eastern Europe more hardline.
5. Greek government sounded more conciliatory last night, less bombastic nationalism than in recent days.
6. Again - creditors are weighing up economic costs of Greek exit vs political costs of a Greek win. That's the choice they have to make.
Two countries: Venezuela, Spain. A name from the past: Admiral Byng
Do you mean the last chap executed for 'failing to engage the enemy', 1750s? That decision was widely considered wrong, against almost all public interest, and IIRC, brought about a change in the law?
Byng is remembered in the famous phrase, "pour encourager les autres":
Byng's execution was satirized by Voltaire in his novel Candide. In Portsmouth, Candide witnesses the execution of an officer by firing squad; and is told that "in this country, it is good to kill an admiral from time to time, in order to encourage the others" (Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres).
Greece will not be the country on Merkel's mind.....
But as Mortimer says the basis of the satire was a widely reviled act that brought an end to such practices. I think publically sacrificing an entire nation for political expediency might be seen with similar revulsion.
I'm not a labour supporter or propagandist. Just enjoying doing research into the fascinating state of the dysfunctional right-wing mind for a book. I'm perfectly well educated thanks. Just stating that having been hothoused into the right university via the usual privileged channels does not in itself make one intelligent, as so many contributions on here prove.
I've got a very good book I would recommend. It's a dictionary. Under I, check out 'irony'. Under S, you may find 'self-awareness.' I agree that being 'hothoused into the right university via the usual privileged channels does not in itself make one intelligent,' but there is a subtext to that comment you seem to have missed.
I would be interested to read your book when it comes out, if only to see what evidence base you've used (I've never quite forgotten the time I read that appallingly inept attempt to psychoanalyse Thatcher by somebody who should, to say the least, have been receiving help) but I rather suspect that its final conclusions will not be worth much if this is a sample of your reasoning.
PS out of curiosity - if you are not a Labour propagandist, why are all your contributions on here pushing the Labour line passim ad nauseam? Just a query.
Laughing at the bunch of prematurely senile middle aged accountants and over educated toffs on here being resolutely unable to get their heads round some actual humanity doing real human stuff.
It's more than a bit sad that there is somebody on here so emotionally disturbed that he(?) finds the collapse of an entire country on the basis of a lie they were told in a referendum campaign to be funny.
Of course, the childish abuse is par for the course from Labour propagandists these days...in a way, having benefitted hugely from those decent middle-ground old Labour types who taught me when I was growing up in an ex-mining area, people who cared about and dedicated their lives to helping the poor, that's even sadder.
The jealousy and spite about your lack of success and inadequate education are fortunately not insoluble, however. The Open University does excellent courses, but be warned they are academically rigorous. Alternatively, if you live in London, Birkbeck might be able to help.
I'm not a labour supporter or propagandist. Just enjoying doing research into the fascinating state of the dysfunctional right-wing mind for a book. I'm perfectly well educated thanks. Just stating that having been hothoused into the right university via the usual privileged channels does not in itself make one intelligent, as so many contributions on here prove.
Yeah, not everyone on here scornful of Greece's tactics is right wing, dysfunctional or otherwise, or got into the !right' university thanks to privilege, just as everyone cheering them is a labour propagandist.
1. The creditors hold the cards now. How they respond to the vote determines what happens next.
2. The ECB will not cut ELA, kill the banks and force an exit until a political decision is made. That might be tomorrow or it might not.
3 . This could end very quickly or it could drag out until the 20th July and a missed ECB payment.
4. Creditors clearly divided - IMF vs many on debt restructuring. France & Italy pushing for a deal, Germany/Eastern Europe more hardline.
5. Greek government sounded more conciliatory last night, less bombastic nationalism than in recent days.
6. Again - creditors are weighing up economic costs of Greek exit vs political costs of a Greek win. That's the choice they have to make.
Two countries: Venezuela, Spain. A name from the past: Admiral Byng
Do you mean the last chap executed for 'failing to engage the enemy', 1750s? That decision was widely considered wrong, against almost all public interest, and IIRC, brought about a change in the law?
Byng is remembered in the famous phrase, "pour encourager les autres":
Byng's execution was satirized by Voltaire in his novel Candide. In Portsmouth, Candide witnesses the execution of an officer by firing squad; and is told that "in this country, it is good to kill an admiral from time to time, in order to encourage the others" (Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres).
Greece will not be the country on Merkel's mind.....
But as Mortimer says the basis of the satire was a widely reviled act that brought an end to such practices. I think publically sacrificing an entire nation for political expediency might be seen with similar revulsion.
It has also been argued that Byng's execution gave British naval commanders a real psychological edge their opponents were fully aware of. Who do you think Merkel would rather face down - Greece or Spain?
1. The creditors hold the cards now. How they respond to the vote determines what happens next.
2. The ECB will not cut ELA, kill the banks and force an exit until a political decision is made. That might be tomorrow or it might not.
3 . This could end very quickly or it could drag out until the 20th July and a missed ECB payment.
4. Creditors clearly divided - IMF vs many on debt restructuring. France & Italy pushing for a deal, Germany/Eastern Europe more hardline.
5. Greek government sounded more conciliatory last night, less bombastic nationalism than in recent days.
6. Again - creditors are weighing up economic costs of Greek exit vs political costs of a Greek win. That's the choice they have to make.
Two countries: Venezuela, Spain. A name from the past: Admiral Byng
Do you mean the last chap executed for 'failing to engage the enemy', 1750s? That decision was widely considered wrong, against almost all public interest, and IIRC, brought about a change in the law?
Byng is remembered in the famous phrase, "pour encourager les autres":
Byng's execution was satirized by Voltaire in his novel Candide. In Portsmouth, Candide witnesses the execution of an officer by firing squad; and is told that "in this country, it is good to kill an admiral from time to time, in order to encourage the others" (Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres).
Greece will not be the country on Merkel's mind.....
But as Mortimer says the basis of the satire was a widely reviled act that brought an end to such practices. I think publically sacrificing an entire nation for political expediency might be seen with similar revulsion.
I actually think that's why they won't be sacrificed, even though they've just called everyone's bluff and laid themselves on the sacrificial block voluntarily. The EU doesn't want to be the villain, even though Greece has contributed an awful lot to its own dire position.
Whether it's worth the risk for Greece depends on how the others justify not carrying out the sacrifice, and whether they'll demand a limb or two at the Leary. We shall see, at present it's unclear.
The ECB could come up with the cash and delay repayments - if they were allowed to take over the Greek economy - that is what administrators do when they take over a bank defaulting company.
This is what would happen in a country run by economists rather than politicians - and is what the IMF try and achieve when they come in to a country, a bailout in return for reform rather than an unconditional loan.
Possibly the best thing that Tsipras can do today is call Mme Legard and work hard on her, he needs to have at least one powerful ally for the coming weeks - which won't be easy for anyone involved.
But he also needs to understand that serious reform will be needed, he can start by putting significant govt assets up for sale and hitting a few of the more obvious and egregious tax evaders hard.
But of a windup merchant today, but this place is so one-sided these days had to have a bit of fun on the odd moment that the sociopaths of the world don't get their own way. Just been reading a lot about the Cretan resistance in WWII, I think anyone knowing anything about their history could have predicted a certain No vote to permanent German enslavement.
As always on PB, the neoliberal view seems to have traction today. The Greeks have frankly made the rational vote. Either way, in 10 years time, they are likely to be better off for voting no. The alternative was endless pain.
I think both alternatives represent long-term pain. The question was one of rescue to faintly mitigate the consequences or total collapse. Maybe in ten years, as you say, they will be better off. But it may well not feel that way.
What of course we don't know is how many of these neo-liberals are actually getting paid to spout their bile...
It reminds me of one of Jim Hacker's irregular verbs:
I am an entrepreneur. You are a crony capitalist. They are all crooks, pure and simple.
As always on PB, the neoliberal view seems to have traction today. The Greeks have frankly made the rational vote. Either way, in 10 years time, they are likely to be better off for voting no. The alternative was endless pain.
I think both alternatives represent long-term pain. The question was one of rescue to faintly mitigate the consequences or total collapse. Maybe in ten years, as you say, they will be better off. But it may well not feel that way.
What of course we don't know is how many of these neo-liberals are actually getting paid to spout their bile...
When it comes to commenting on the Internet, enthusiastic amateurs on all sides do the job best without any need for professionals, ie those being paid or actually working in a relevant profession as well.
But of a windup merchant today, but this place is so one-sided these days had to have a bit of fun on the odd moment that the sociopaths of the world don't get their own way. Just been reading a lot about the Cretan resistance in WWII, I think anyone knowing anything about their history could have predicted a certain No vote to permanent German enslavement.
If you do not want the Devil to claim his kilo of flesh, then you should not seek favours from him in the first place.
Comments
A range of views:
Hand wringing in the Grauniad:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/05/the-guardian-view-on-greeces-no-vote-eight-days-that-shook-a-continent
Doesn't dwell (at all) on how German, French & Italian tax payers should pay for it...
Tim Stanley in The Telegraph wants to 'show compassion':
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/greece/11719861/Greece-has-captured-its-conqueror.-Now-the-EU-should-forgive-and-restructure-the-debt.html
While the Specie has two articles more focussed on what may happen next:
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/fraser-nelson/2015/07/the-greeks-have-voted-no-now-the-real-crisis-will-begin/
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/james-forsyth/2015/07/greece-says-no-will-germany-now-try-and-kick-it-out-of-the-euro/
And the ghost of Admiral Byng looks down.....the Greeks having forgotten his lesson, Angela Merkel seems very mindful of it.....
http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/item/wolfson-economics-prize-2012
- A new currency is introduced at parity with the Euro on day 1 of an exit.
-All wages, prices, loans and deposits are redenominated into it 1 for 1.
Euro notes and coins would remain in use for small transactions for up to six months.
- The exiting country would immediately announce a regime of inflation targeting, adopt a set of tough fiscal rules, monitored by a body of independent experts, outlaw wage indexation, and announce the issue of inflation-linked government bonds.
Doesn't feel like it........
The Germans simply have to do......nothing, and let events take their course.....
How you can deal with that in a global economy I'm not sure.
However, if most "small" people have already withdrawn their savings and either spent them or put them under the mattress closing the banks will simply mean that there's only a cash economy, so it'll be bigger busines that comes to a grinding halt. We already know there are medicine shortages because pharmacists can't pay multi-nationals.
Greece's options look to have been really crappy but they appear to have made their choice and given the dire warnings of other leaders, they gave made that choice with eyes open. So if they don't get a better deal, they will be out of line if say they must still be rescued and how not doing so is punishing them for their democratic choice. As they say, freedom includes the freedom to accept consequences, and having shown 2 fingers to the creditors, no one has to offer them jack squat now.
They still might, and that be the fairest or at least least worst option, but Greece have lost to claim betrayal if the don't.
- Default on all debts to overseas lenders.
- Start issuing electronic IOUs, theoretically redeemable for Euros at some future date.
- Make a law that wages, pensions and bank deposits are payable in IOUs.
- Introduce an electronic payment system like the MPESA so that you can spend IOUs in shops. This also has the benefit of making transactions easier to tax.
The IOUs will immediately plummet in value, so in effect you'be just cut wages and welfare, not to mention a bank deposit haircut. What happens next is one of two things:
a) The economy recovers, you get a primary budget surplus, the IOUs start to look like they may actually be redeemable for Euros, and their value recovers. If things go well enough you ultimately cut a new deal with the lendors who get something back instead of nothing and either recapitalise the banks with normal Euros or let people bank with German banks instead.
b) The economy doesn't recover and the government is still spending more than it gets, so you just keep making up ever-devaluing IOUs forever.
BTW, you are absolutely right about tax. The Greek government collects taxes equivalent to around about 32% of GDP. That is 5-10% less than anyone else in Europe. At the height of the Eurozone crisis, I saw a speech by former MEP John Stevens, who had the memorable line "If the Greeks paid as much taxes (as a proportion of income) as the Italians, their budget would be in balance. If they paid as much as the French, they would have a surplus."
I honestly thought politics was going to get boring for a few months ...
I could be wrong, but that sounds unlikely.
Could you devalue (slightly, or a lot) at each switchover?
(or tweeted to be precise): Well done to the people of Greece. European leaders should now respond constructively to the democratic voice of the Greek people.
How much Scottish tax payers money is the SNP Foreign Affairs spokesman proposing they send?
what do you reckon?
Debt and saving are opposite sides of the same coin. They are both mechanisms for the time transfer of work. Somebody who borrows is one who wishes to consume today, and someone who saves is one who wishes to consumer tomorrow.
When we talk of about debt forgiveness, let us be honest and call it savings destruction. The Greek government wishes to reduce the savings of millions of people.
What it cannot have is debt relief without reform. And what the Greeks have voted for is debt relief without reform (or, austerity, as some like to call it).
We have Salmond, Blanchflower and others cheering the Greeks on and calling for EU 'flexibility' (who pays for this flexibility generally unspecified, except for Blanchflower, who says the Germans should pay, without resorting to a referendum, presumably) and all the other forces of 'Anti-Austerity'
And then we have the rest, who have generally been more circumspect in their pronouncements.
As Ben Goldacre frequently observes 'I think you'll find its a bit more complicated than that.....
Even if the ELA allowed the banks to borrow more money (and somehow I doubt the banks are solvent enough for that to happen) the cash withdrawals are such that further withdrawals will eventually make the banks insolvent..
The ironic thing is that the above would be true regardless of what the vote was.... The problem with a No vote is that people are going to blame Varoufakis and co..
Up until the vote, the only people whose opinion mattered were the Greeks'
After the vote, their opinion is largely irrelevant. Now other people decide.
Leaders have swung from lamp posts for less.
1. The creditors hold the cards now. How they respond to the vote determines what happens next.
2. The ECB will not cut ELA, kill the banks and force an exit until a political decision is made. That might be tomorrow or it might not.
3 . This could end very quickly or it could drag out until the 20th July and a missed ECB payment.
4. Creditors clearly divided - IMF vs many on debt restructuring. France & Italy pushing for a deal, Germany/Eastern Europe more hardline.
5. Greek government sounded more conciliatory last night, less bombastic nationalism than in recent days.
6. Again - creditors are weighing up economic costs of Greek exit vs political costs of a Greek win. That's the choice they have to make.
Two countries: Venezuela, Spain.
A name from the past: Admiral Byng
The ability to buy exports including food is limited to the amount of euros currently in the Greek system. Shortages will grow from local difficulties to serious this week. More people will leave. A lot more people. People who have probably not paid as much tax as they should in the past. They will pay none in the future.
Syriza have led their people over the cliff. It won't take long for them to hit the bottom. And all the creditors can do at the moment is wait and prepare their own systems for inevitable default by the Greeks. The idea that they will advance more money to break the fall is frankly absurd.
http://yanisvaroufakis.eu/2015/07/06/minister-no-more/
He's doing a runner before the locals realise what's happened and get the piano wire ready.
We of the Left know how to act collectively with no care for the privileges of office.
Obviously part of a deal with someone for him to go.
I could be entirely wrong but this is my guess on what will happen next:
1) Today, Merkel simply says that there are no further negotiations with the Greek government
2) Tomorrow, every Greek bank collapses;
3) Wednesday, the Greek government has to fire up the printing press. At that point, whether officially or not, it has left the Euro;
4) Thursday, the new currency comes under attack;
5) Friday, the Greek government officially announces default;
6) Saturday, the riots start.
That seems the likely order of events, although the timescale may be completely wrong.
The reason I believe this is because the alternative is as follows:
1) Merkel gives in and rescues the Greek economy;
2) The Spanish government collapses under pressure from the far left and a new anti-austerity party comes to power demanding the same deal for Spain;
3) Because that is unaffordable, the euro collapses and takes the world economy with it.
Since Merkel is essentially a pragmatist, I'm pretty sure she will sacrifice the Greeks - and probably take delight in doing down Tsipras - in order to save the rest.
What was that passage in the Bible about 'if an eye offend you, pluck it out - for it is better to go through life with one eye, than spend an eternity in hell with two'?
They'll start to smoulder if the banks don't open tomorrow, and really kick off when the cashpoints run out of money.
Therefore, the only person who can save the Greek economy now and prevent a Grexit is Merkel, and I'm pretty sure she won't do it. Leaving aside the appalling behaviour Tsipras and Varoufakis have exhibited towards her, she'd never carry the German government and people with her. Also, she will be thinking of the wider consequences of being too nice to people who have decided that childish abuse and denial of their own complicity in the crisis is the way to make their creditors pay attention to them.
And unlike the EU, Merkel can and does play hardball. Look at the way she treated the Social Democrats under the first grand coalition if you don't believe me.
This is quite an interesting analysis, although it's a lot more optimistic(!) than my own:
http://blogs.reuters.com/hugo-dixon/2015/07/05/greece-will-struggle-to-stay-in-euro/
It would look politically awful to everyone if Greece is thrown under the bus for the decision of their people, so we will see a load more fudge that at least allows the banks to give the impression of being open and something approaching normality to resume.
And I think the EU (again, here we're talking about the political not economic leaders) will take the view that they are not ejecting the Greeks - rather, that the Greeks have ejected themselves.
Like I say, I could be and indeed hope I am wrong. It's also true the EU tends to deal in the art of the possible. But I suspect that raw emotion will outweigh principles in this case.
So events in Greece will overtake any talks. I think the cash machines will be empty by lunchtime.
Greece has only ever printed €5, €10, €20. Only DE, AT, LU ever had plates for €200, €500 (via @TheDefaultLine )
Of course, the childish abuse is par for the course from Labour propagandists these days...in a way, having benefitted hugely from those decent middle-ground old Labour types who taught me when I was growing up in an ex-mining area, people who cared about and dedicated their lives to helping the poor, that's even sadder.
The jealousy and spite about your lack of success and inadequate education are fortunately not insoluble, however. The Open University does excellent courses, but be warned they are academically rigorous. Alternatively, if you live in London, Birkbeck might be able to help.
Plus was loving the neck and neck/tctc opinion polls prior to the referendum result.
We are seeing what happens when the likes of Owen Jones form a government of a country.
Anyone know definitively if Greece can actually print Euros on their own, because if so someone at the ECB must surely be in a whole load of trouble!
The second was so difficult to work out that it was never actually successfully prosecuted again, although I think Robert Calder was charged with it after his engagement with Villeneuve in 1805.
As I recall - I haven't checked - Byng attacked a group of ships but then backed off due to an adverse tide and let some of them get away. He was therefore accused of having failed to press the attack when he should, found guilty, and shot.
At the moment the likes of Merkel will be desperately trying to fudge a compromise that looks from the outside like they haven't done exactly that.
Tsipras has played them all at their own game and made them look foolish.
Still, don't worry guys. Just ratchet up the abuse of those who disagree with you.
Byng's execution was satirized by Voltaire in his novel Candide. In Portsmouth, Candide witnesses the execution of an officer by firing squad; and is told that "in this country, it is good to kill an admiral from time to time, in order to encourage the others" (Dans ce pays-ci, il est bon de tuer de temps en temps un amiral pour encourager les autres).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Byng
Greece will not be the country on Merkel's mind.....
The people who celebrated with their hearts last night will have woken up to the same problems this morning.
I've no wish for things to get worse for the Greeks, though in the short term that seems unavoidable and this time they cannot blame anyone for taking this path, right or wrong, but I almost agreeing would be amusing for the other parties to delay any action until referendums of their own. That's the only way for them to follow the will of the relevant people after all.
I would be interested to read your book when it comes out, if only to see what evidence base you've used (I've never quite forgotten the time I read that appallingly inept attempt to psychoanalyse Thatcher by somebody who should, to say the least, have been receiving help) but I rather suspect that its final conclusions will not be worth much if this is a sample of your reasoning.
PS out of curiosity - if you are not a Labour propagandist, why are all your contributions on here pushing the Labour line passim ad nauseam? Just a query.
Last time I'll post it, but those after a post-race analysis of an exciting (don't listen to Mr. Jessop) British Grand Prix, which was also quite green, click here: http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/united-kingdom-post-race-analysis.html
Surprised to read the finance chap's gone.
Whether it's worth the risk for Greece depends on how the others justify not carrying out the sacrifice, and whether they'll demand a limb or two at the Leary. We shall see, at present it's unclear.
Possibly the best thing that Tsipras can do today is call Mme Legard and work hard on her, he needs to have at least one powerful ally for the coming weeks - which won't be easy for anyone involved.
But he also needs to understand that serious reform will be needed, he can start by putting significant govt assets up for sale and hitting a few of the more obvious and egregious tax evaders hard.
It reminds me of one of Jim Hacker's irregular verbs:
I am an entrepreneur. You are a crony capitalist. They are all crooks, pure and simple.
With PODEMAS possibly rising to power in Spain is that really something they want to do ?
A pleasant day to all
https://twitter.com/MacroPolis_gr/status/617954668212322304/photo/1