Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » How voting dynamics are different in the tight CON – LAB ba

SystemSystem Posts: 12,291
edited April 2015 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » How voting dynamics are different in the tight CON – LAB battlegrounds compared with the country as a whole

One of the great things about tonight’s ComRes/ITV marginals poll is that it gave us data that we could compare with national polling to see different patterns.

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    Interesting take on the Winning Here bar chart

    @CCHQPress: We need just 23 seats to win a majority - Miliband can only become PM by doing a deal with the SNP #VoteConservative http://t.co/Tc05nfAUKN
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    Second!
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    GeoffM said:

    Second!

    Like Ed...
  • SMukeshSMukesh Posts: 1,759
    38% of Libs...that`s a lot and there`s more to squeeze from the Greens!
  • SMukeshSMukesh Posts: 1,759
    Scott_P said:

    GeoffM said:

    Second!

    Like Ed...
    Second and PM.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    RobD said:

    From thread earlier today.
    SNP 59 seats, get it sorted Nicola.
    Oh you already have.

    Only downhill from here ;):D
    You may be right.
    I saw some canvas returns for Dundee East, i felt so sorry for the unionist candidates i considered voting for one of them.

    It was more like Moscow East in the USSR heyday

    I still want a market for largest majority. Hosie would be a shoe in while the bookie would probably be focused on a Tory or Labour safe seat.
    What about Angus MacNeil ?
    Too small a constituency. I was thinking about numbers.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,024
    edited April 2015

    Re Trident

    I suspect the UK military will soon consist of:

    Trident
    Ceremonial soldiers for the tourists
    And f'ck all in between

    Whereas its the bit in between which is the important part.

    Sounds about right. There may be some shiny, non-functioning fancy equipment too.


    SeanTGood point (tangentially) Clegg is quite likely to lose his seat, and even if scrapes through, he might not be leader. Will the next Lib Dem leader feel obliged to adhere to Clegg's pledges (no deal with DUP, SNP etc)? I doubt it. Why would they?

    So all these Clegg remarks are quite probably worthless.


    If anything it's probably a bit irritating for those in his party who don't need to rely on Tory tactical votes to the same degree Clegg does, who might feel they will catch flak for it in their areas as Clegg tries to save his own seat.

    And while I do hope he retains it - if nothing else, I think the LD attempt to recover will be much more interesting if they can have the electorate decapitate their leadership for them than if he is still in the parliamentary party - any attempt of his to retain the leadership is surely futile, so he's not helping the party much if his pro-Tory interpreted remarks have an impact elsewhere.


  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    SPIN has UKIP only 3 -4 now.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    SMukesh said:

    38% of Libs...that`s a lot and there`s more to squeeze from the Greens!

    The Greens give Labour the same headache as UKIPgives the Tories. Thankfully the number is smaller.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,024
    Will the longstanding theory of the Red Liberals winning it for Ed M truly come to pass?
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    So, Tories are getting 6% more 2010 LD in Tory marginals while Labour gets 12% more 2010 LD in Tory marginals.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
  • Eh_ehm_a_ehEh_ehm_a_eh Posts: 552
    Dair said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    RobD said:

    From thread earlier today.
    SNP 59 seats, get it sorted Nicola.
    Oh you already have.

    Only downhill from here ;):D
    You may be right.
    I saw some canvas returns for Dundee East, i felt so sorry for the unionist candidates i considered voting for one of them.

    It was more like Moscow East in the USSR heyday

    I still want a market for largest majority. Hosie would be a shoe in while the bookie would probably be focused on a Tory or Labour safe seat.
    What about Angus MacNeil ?
    Too small a constituency. I was thinking about numbers.
    Scottish election 2011 Dundee East SNP majority 41.5%
    Western Isles SNP majority 36.7%

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,742
    Dair said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    RobD said:

    From thread earlier today.
    SNP 59 seats, get it sorted Nicola.
    Oh you already have.

    Only downhill from here ;):D
    You may be right.
    I saw some canvas returns for Dundee East, i felt so sorry for the unionist candidates i considered voting for one of them.

    It was more like Moscow East in the USSR heyday

    I still want a market for largest majority. Hosie would be a shoe in while the bookie would probably be focused on a Tory or Labour safe seat.
    What about Angus MacNeil ?
    Too small a constituency. I was thinking about numbers.
    % terms though, is it him or Hosie ?

    What % do you think Hosie could get ? 80 ?
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    surbiton said:

    SPIN has UKIP only 3 -4 now.

    Barring a surprise in a seat that hasn't been polled, or if LordA's methodology is seriously wrong, then it's Clacton, Thurrock plus any of Thanet S, Castle Point, Rochester or Boston.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    SPIN Con +19
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long
  • MontyMonty Posts: 346
    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    Your over-confidence will be your downfall.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108

    Re Trident

    I suspect the UK military will soon consist of:

    Trident
    Ceremonial soldiers for the tourists
    And f'ck all in between

    Whereas its the bit in between which is the important part.

    You forget enormous Aircraft Carriers for Blue Water Power Projection with some 20 year old unarmed Westland helicopters on the,
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,024
    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    Your over-confidence will be your downfall.
    People said the same thing during the IndyRef campaign. And, granted, they were right, although that seems small comfort now.

  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Dair said:

    Re Trident

    I suspect the UK military will soon consist of:

    Trident
    Ceremonial soldiers for the tourists
    And f'ck all in between

    Whereas its the bit in between which is the important part.

    You forget enormous Aircraft Carriers for Blue Water Power Projection with some 20 year old unarmed Westland helicopters on the,
    Without Trident we will have to re-introduce the draft.
    Fancy a spell in a military camp in Sussex?
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    Political betting at its finest;

    SPIN;

    "Night of the Long Knives"

    How many of these high profile MPs/Candidates will NOT win their seat in the forthcoming General Election (May 7th 2015):

    Nigel Farage (Thanet South),
    Nick Clegg (Sheffield Hallam),
    Ed Balls (Morley & Outwood),
    Douglas Alexander (Paisley & Renfr' S.),
    Danny Alexander (Inverness, Nairn...),
    Jim Murphy (Renfrewshire East),
    Charles Kennedy (Ross Skye & Loch'),
    Simon Hughes (Bermondsey & S'wark),
    Esther McVey (Wirral West),
    George Galloway (Bradford West)

    0 fail to win (i.e all win their seats) = 0
    1 fails to win = 5 pts
    2 fail to win = 10 pts
    3 fail to win = 15 pts
    4 fail to win = 20 pts
    5 fail to win = 25 pts
    6 fail to win = 30 pts
    7 fail to win = 40 pts
    8 fail to win = 60 pts
    9 fail to win = 80 pts
    All 10 fail to win = 100 pts

    Only 1 score counts, based on the exact number who fail to win.
    Min MU = 0, Max MU =100.

    Current Spread:

    SELL 27 - 32 BUY

    https://www.sportingindex.com/spread-betting/politics/british/mm4.uk.meeting.5103806/uk-general-election-specials-and-matchbets
  • MontyMonty Posts: 346
    kle4 said:

    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    Your over-confidence will be your downfall.
    People said the same thing during the IndyRef campaign. And, granted, they were right, although that seems small comfort now.

    Yes. And politics is like that. Counterintuitively, the worst outcome for the Nats right now is to clean up and win every seat. They won't be able to contain their membership and MPs and will overplay their hand. A backlash will follow. Labour need to hold their nerve post election and see what another election brings.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    RobD said:

    From thread earlier today.
    SNP 59 seats, get it sorted Nicola.
    Oh you already have.

    Only downhill from here ;):D
    You may be right.
    I saw some canvas returns for Dundee East, i felt so sorry for the unionist candidates i considered voting for one of them.

    It was more like Moscow East in the USSR heyday

    I still want a market for largest majority. Hosie would be a shoe in while the bookie would probably be focused on a Tory or Labour safe seat.
    What about Angus MacNeil ?
    Too small a constituency. I was thinking about numbers.
    % terms though, is it him or Hosie ?

    What % do you think Hosie could get ? 80 ?
    I think it's still Hosie. MacNeill will always be Three In A Bed With Teenagers McNeill even if they never actually got to the bed.

    Dunno about points, I'm thinking Hosie could be a 28k majority.
  • another_richardanother_richard Posts: 26,996
    kle4 said:

    Re Trident

    I suspect the UK military will soon consist of:

    Trident
    Ceremonial soldiers for the tourists
    And f'ck all in between

    Whereas its the bit in between which is the important part.

    Sounds about right. There may be some shiny, non-functioning fancy equipment too.


    There will.

    And plenty of MoD bureaucrats.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Pong said:

    Political betting at its finest;

    SPIN;

    "Night of the Long Knives"

    How many of these high profile MPs/Candidates will NOT win their seat in the forthcoming General Election (May 7th 2015):

    Nigel Farage (Thanet South),
    Nick Clegg (Sheffield Hallam),
    Ed Balls (Morley & Outwood),
    Douglas Alexander (Paisley & Renfr' S.),
    Danny Alexander (Inverness, Nairn...),
    Jim Murphy (Renfrewshire East),
    Charles Kennedy (Ross Skye & Loch'),
    Simon Hughes (Bermondsey & S'wark),
    Esther McVey (Wirral West),
    George Galloway (Bradford West)

    0 fail to win (i.e all win their seats) = 0
    1 fails to win = 5 pts
    2 fail to win = 10 pts
    3 fail to win = 15 pts
    4 fail to win = 20 pts
    5 fail to win = 25 pts
    6 fail to win = 30 pts
    7 fail to win = 40 pts
    8 fail to win = 60 pts
    9 fail to win = 80 pts
    All 10 fail to win = 100 pts

    Only 1 score counts, based on the exact number who fail to win.
    Min MU = 0, Max MU =100.

    Current Spread:

    SELL 27 - 32 BUY

    https://www.sportingindex.com/spread-betting/politics/british/mm4.uk.meeting.5103806/uk-general-election-specials-and-matchbets

    I make it:
    Nigel Farage (Thanet South), 50%
    Nick Clegg (Sheffield Hallam), 60%
    Ed Balls (Morley & Outwood), 0%
    Douglas Alexander (Paisley & Renfr' S.), 100%
    Danny Alexander (Inverness, Nairn...), 100%
    Jim Murphy (Renfrewshire East), 90%
    Charles Kennedy (Ross Skye & Loch'), 100%
    Simon Hughes (Bermondsey & S'wark), 40%
    Esther McVey (Wirral West), 70%
    George Galloway (Bradford West) 0%
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    OT:

    Ashcroft's polls at constituency level show a rough ratio of 2:1 LD switchers to be the breaking point for at which Labour take the seat, and the Tories lose it. Below 2:1 the Tories tend to hold.

    Tonight's Comres marginals poll shows a real aversion among undecided LD/Kippers to any form of Lab/SNP arrangement.

    It's going to decide the election.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,024
    SeanT said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    For that reason, as I said, any Lab-SNP alliance will be time-limited, up to Holyrood 2016. Then it falls.

    Makes sense. Ed M will surely take up that time limited offer rather than any alternative, that is him not being in No.10. If he can figure out a way to improve his own position in that time he'll deserve to be rewarded, as I cannot picture how he could.

    Without that push for a second IndyRef, I could easily see the parties lasting a lot longer a lot easier than people suspect.

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,742
    Dair said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Dair said:

    RobD said:

    From thread earlier today.
    SNP 59 seats, get it sorted Nicola.
    Oh you already have.

    Only downhill from here ;):D
    You may be right.
    I saw some canvas returns for Dundee East, i felt so sorry for the unionist candidates i considered voting for one of them.

    It was more like Moscow East in the USSR heyday

    I still want a market for largest majority. Hosie would be a shoe in while the bookie would probably be focused on a Tory or Labour safe seat.
    What about Angus MacNeil ?
    Too small a constituency. I was thinking about numbers.
    % terms though, is it him or Hosie ?

    What % do you think Hosie could get ? 80 ?
    I think it's still Hosie. MacNeill will always be Three In A Bed With Teenagers McNeill even if they never actually got to the bed.

    Dunno about points, I'm thinking Hosie could be a 28k majority.
    The bookies are still 1-100 on Dundee East. That's got to be the safest 1-100 bet ever.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    SeanT said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    I agree with you, Sturgeon will have to include it in the next manifesto (tho I think your referendum will be lost, if you get the chance). At that point - as the SNP commits, again, to breaking up Britain, ANY Labour-SNP alliance becomes utterly untenable. How can SNP MPs vote on anything to do with the English in London? How can Miliband morally and politically rely on their support to stay in power?

    He can't. Unless he really wants Labour to be destroyed, forever, in the ensuing election.

    For that reason, as I said, any Lab-SNP alliance will be time-limited, up to Holyrood 2016. Then it falls.

    I'm not sure they'll even make it to Holyrood 2016, the campaigning for Holyrood 2016 begins effectively once the dust settles on the General Election and come the New Year it will well and truly dominate the media (especially if the SNP are pledging a referendum).
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,742
    Someone run the UK Election using inputs a billion times. I reckon Dundee East wouldn't fall once.
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    chestnut said:

    OT:

    Ashcroft's polls at constituency level show a rough ratio of 2:1 LD switchers to be the breaking point for at which Labour take the seat, and the Tories lose it. Below 2:1 the Tories tend to hold.

    Tonight's Comres marginals poll shows a real aversion among undecided LD/Kippers to any form of Lab/SNP arrangement.

    It's going to decide the election.

    The polls also say that the voters are bored sick of the SNP scaremongering and want to talk about something else.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    SeanT said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    I agree with you, Sturgeon will have to include it in the next manifesto (tho I think your referendum will be lost, if you get the chance). At that point - as the SNP commits, again, to breaking up Britain, ANY Labour-SNP alliance becomes utterly untenable. How can SNP MPs vote on anything to do with the English in London? How can Miliband morally and politically rely on their support to stay in power?

    He can't. Unless he really wants Labour to be destroyed, forever, in the ensuing election.

    For that reason, as I said, any Lab-SNP alliance will be time-limited, up to Holyrood 2016. Then it falls.

    Yes, I understand what you are saying.

    But. Why would the SNP care.

    And I think the next referendum is already decided. The nation is charmed by Nicola. There is no reason to think she cannot maintain that until 2017/8.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    The Telegraph ‏@Telegraph 8m8 minutes ago
    Take more migrants or they will 'come through the window' says EU chief Jean-Claude Juncker http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/11572351/Take-more-migrants-or-they-will-come-through-the-window-says-EU-chief-Jean-Claude-Juncker.html
  • MontyMonty Posts: 346
    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    Until the wheel turns. This is the high watermark for the SNP. Enjoy it while you can.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 18,013
    Many of the 2010 LDs in the Con/Lab seats were Cleggasm voters; people who'd not voted LD before and hadn't been prompted by local campaigning. It's not surprising that these floating voters have now gone elsewhere. By contrast, the other seats include all the LD-hold ones and most of those where the LDs are close. It's highly likely that there'll be a greater proportion of solid supporters there, even allowing for the higher absolute level to start with.
  • SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    MikeK said:

    The Telegraph ‏@Telegraph 8m8 minutes ago
    Take more migrants or they will 'come through the window' says EU chief Jean-Claude Juncker http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/11572351/Take-more-migrants-or-they-will-come-through-the-window-says-EU-chief-Jean-Claude-Juncker.html

    Is he going to introduce an EU migrant quota?
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    Speedy said:

    The polls also say that the voters are bored sick of the SNP scaremongering and want to talk about something else.

    They're bored of Scotland and will vote accordingly.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,024
    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
  • frpenkridgefrpenkridge Posts: 670
    Are we being told that, on the one hand, the British electorate are so stupid that they do not know if Nigel Farage is a candidate in their constituency, but on the other hand, they are sophisticated enough to realise that their constituency is a marginal and are voting differently?
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 18,013
    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    Your over-confidence will be your downfall.
    Your faith in your friends will be yours.
  • weejonnieweejonnie Posts: 3,820
    Scott_P said:

    Interesting take on the Winning Here bar chart

    @CCHQPress: We need just 23 seats to win a majority - Miliband can only become PM by doing a deal with the SNP #VoteConservative http://t.co/Tc05nfAUKN

    UKIP only need 23 seats to win a majority - if you forget the '3' that has to be put in front of the 23.
  • From previous thread

    I've also worked out new regional allocations based on a 600 seat parliament (as planned unless the boundary review rules are changed or it is voted down)

    East of England - 56 seats (current entitlement 58)
    E Midlands - 43 seats (current entitlement 46)
    London - 68 seats (current entitlement 73)
    North East - 25 seats (current entitlement 29)
    North West - 68 seats (current entitlement 75)
    South East - 83 seats (current entitlement 84)
    South West - 53 seats (current entitlement 55)
    W Midlands - 53 seats (current entitlement 59)
    Yorkshire - 50 seats (current entitlement 54)
    Scotland - 53 seats (current entitlement 59)
    Wales - 29 seats (current entitlement 40)
    N Ireland - 16 seats (current entitlement 18)

    Total - 597 seats (currently 650). I think the reason it is less than 600 is that special provisions are made for Isle of Wight to have 2 seats and for Orkney/Shetland and Western Isles

    Wales loses the most due to the end of its over-representation. I'm surprised Scotland isn't going up due to the referendum but I think Scotland's population is growing less slowly than other parts of the UK.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Are they a married couple now ?? .... and arguing in one of Ed's kitchens ?

  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,024
    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    You may be proven right, but I really don't see how you can be so definitive when the very fact that the SNP have gone from moderately to immensely popular within a few years shows that situations can change very rapidly. I put no timeline on when if ever Labour might recover in Scotland, but just the merest hint that there is the possibility of things not working out 100% in the favour of the SNP forever (it certainly is going that way currently, I'll grant you) would do a lot to dispel all those claims of hubris. Eventual hubris at any rate.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    I gave up after 90 seconds.
  • MontyMonty Posts: 346
    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    How does that disagree with anything I said, or mean that I'm missing the point.

    Labour won't just acknowledge they're finished in Scotland, especially in Holyrood which has a form of Proportional Representation so no party is ever truly finished (even the Tories have 15 MSPs).

    So once we head into the Holyrood election campaign Labour are locked into an existential battle to the death with a party that (as you're showing) wants to destroy not just the UK but Labour themselves.

    And supposedly these parties are going to be working together amicably running the country? I don't think so.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    Speedy said:

    MikeK said:

    The Telegraph ‏@Telegraph 8m8 minutes ago
    Take more migrants or they will 'come through the window' says EU chief Jean-Claude Juncker http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ukip/11572351/Take-more-migrants-or-they-will-come-through-the-window-says-EU-chief-Jean-Claude-Juncker.html

    Is he going to introduce an EU migrant quota?
    That seems obvious from what has been said.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,742
    SeanT said:

    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    Your over-confidence will be your downfall.
    People said the same thing during the IndyRef campaign. And, granted, they were right, although that seems small comfort now.

    Yes. And politics is like that. Counterintuitively, the worst outcome for the Nats right now is to clean up and win every seat. They won't be able to contain their membership and MPs and will overplay their hand. A backlash will follow. Labour need to hold their nerve post election and see what another election brings.
    Worth recalling the kind of pungently nasty, quasi-racist MP the Nats will be sending to London, if they really do a clean sweep.

    Men like George Kerevan, who happily anticipates a UK economic implosion (as it aids independence) and sees non Scot Brits as "the enemy".


    https://twitter.com/flashgrim/status/592693516653985793

    What will this do the image of the Nats, at home, and in the wider UK? We shall see.
    The #SNPOut bunch strike me as a bitter bunch.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 97,024
    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
    Sadly it does not appear a great deal of SLAB voters shared the same antipathy for the SNP, nor support for the Unionist cause, as the Lab leadership. Wasn't there also polling out there that an SNP-Lab alliance was quite a popular option in Scotland? I apologise if I have that wrong.
  • trubluetrublue Posts: 103
    I'm amazed the FTSE has held together so well with all the fear and uncertainty about the outcome of this election. I'd say it's definitely hurting the Conservartives. If the stock market slumped and we saw sterling weaken it might sharpen a significant number of voters minds about the need to deliver a decisive result next week. Maybe we might see some speculation next week sending markets tumbling, but by then its impact will be limited because of the mass of postal votes already returned.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    Until the wheel turns. This is the high watermark for the SNP. Enjoy it while you can.
    It won't be Labour benefiting from any SNP reversal (and that could be decades away).

    It will be the Tories and Greens.
  • MontyMonty Posts: 346
    SeanT said:

    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    Your over-confidence will be your downfall.
    People said the same thing during the IndyRef campaign. And, granted, they were right, although that seems small comfort now.

    Yes. And politics is like that. Counterintuitively, the worst outcome for the Nats right now is to clean up and win every seat. They won't be able to contain their membership and MPs and will overplay their hand. A backlash will follow. Labour need to hold their nerve post election and see what another election brings.
    Worth recalling the kind of pungently nasty, quasi-racist MP the Nats will be sending to London, if they really do a clean sweep.

    Men like George Kerevan, who happily anticipates a UK economic implosion (as it aids independence) and sees non Scot Brits as "the enemy".


    https://twitter.com/flashgrim/status/592693516653985793

    What will this do the image of the Nats, at home, and in the wider UK? We shall see.
    Well, it won't do it any good to moderate Scots, of which there are many. I expect the SNP vote to decline and when tactical voting kicks in it will accelerate. It took 2 or 3 elections for tactical voting to harm the Tories. The same may be true for Scotland, although I suspect it won't take as long.
    Politics is a long game.
    Crucially the referendum was lost recently. The unionist parties can avoid another one for a long time.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108

    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    Your over-confidence will be your downfall.
    Your faith in your friends will be yours.
    Herdson shot first.
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    Tonight's #Newsnight index - CON down 1, SNP up 1

    https://twitter.com/BBCNewsnight/status/593511112491945984/photo/1
  • MikeLMikeL Posts: 7,741

    From previous thread

    I've also worked out new regional allocations based on a 600 seat parliament (as planned unless the boundary review rules are changed or it is voted down)

    East of England - 56 seats (current entitlement 58)
    E Midlands - 43 seats (current entitlement 46)
    London - 68 seats (current entitlement 73)
    North East - 25 seats (current entitlement 29)
    North West - 68 seats (current entitlement 75)
    South East - 83 seats (current entitlement 84)
    South West - 53 seats (current entitlement 55)
    W Midlands - 53 seats (current entitlement 59)
    Yorkshire - 50 seats (current entitlement 54)
    Scotland - 53 seats (current entitlement 59)
    Wales - 29 seats (current entitlement 40)
    N Ireland - 16 seats (current entitlement 18)

    Total - 597 seats (currently 650). I think the reason it is less than 600 is that special provisions are made for Isle of Wight to have 2 seats and for Orkney/Shetland and Western Isles

    Wales loses the most due to the end of its over-representation. I'm surprised Scotland isn't going up due to the referendum but I think Scotland's population is growing less slowly than other parts of the UK.

    Very interesting data on previous thread re individual constituency data.

    We know East London is the fastest growing part of the UK. So East Ham and West Ham should be right at the top of the list - indeed their electorates should have grown most since 2010.

    The fact they aren't there shows Individual Voter Registration has pushed people off the list.

    It won't matter, of course, in East Ham and West Ham but if it's happened nationwide then it can only hurt Lab and help Con.

    However the figures will have risen with the late rush to register - we really do need to see final numbers and compare to 2010.
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    From the last thread, I actually think Clegg is probably the biggest chance the Tories have of forming a coalition with the LDs. I doubt any other LD, is going to be as keen as Clegg - the only other option would be Alexander, who is likely to lose his seat too.
  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    A lot better for Ed than the clip made it seem.

    I expect him to do well tomorrow night - the practice seems to be helping (he is performing better than at the beginning of the campaign)
  • kjohnwkjohnw Posts: 1,456
    just a little song for England to lament with if EdM / SNP do become government:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-Vuj5FeK00

    the hard times of old England

    Come all brother tradesment that travel along
    O pray, come and tell me where the trade is all gone
    Long time have I travelled, and I cannot find none
    Chorus
    And sing all the hard times of old England
    In old England, very hard times
    Provisions you buy at the shop, it is true
    But if you've no money, there's none there for you
    So what's a poor man and his family to do?
    Chorus
    You must go to the shop and you'll ask for a job
    They'll answer you there with a shake and a nod
    And that's enough to make a man turn out and rob
    Chorus
    You will see the poor tradesmen a-walkin's the street
    From morning to night for employment to seek
    And scarce have they got any shoes to their feet
    Chorus
    Our soldiers and sailors have just come from war
    Been fighting for Queen and country this year
    Come home to be starved, better stayed where they were
    Chorus
    And now to conclude and to finish my song
    Let us hope that these hard times will not last long
    I hope soon to have occasion to alter my song, and sing
    Oh, the good times of old England
    In old England, jolly good times!
  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    Dair said:

    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    HYUFD said:

    SeanT Sturgeon will only hold another referendum if sure she can win it, or post an EU exit after a 2017 EU referendum. She knows from Quebec's experience even a 51-49% No win in a second referendum effectively kills the independence argument for good

    Utter nonsense.

    Quebec was lost because they waited too long. The SNP know this. 50% of Scotland wants another referendum inside 5 years, 65% within 10 years. It will be on the 2016 manifesto. The SNP know it is necessary and are already planning it.
    Your over-confidence will be your downfall.
    Your faith in your friends will be yours.
    Herdson shot first.
    May the 4th be with you
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @SamCoatesTimes: EXC: Times / YouGov airwar tracker. Tories close the gap, only behind Labour by 2 points (yesterday was 9 pt lead) http://t.co/mZ1lDVq5G4
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    kle4 said:

    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    You may be proven right, but I really don't see how you can be so definitive when the very fact that the SNP have gone from moderately to immensely popular within a few years shows that situations can change very rapidly. I put no timeline on when if ever Labour might recover in Scotland, but just the merest hint that there is the possibility of things not working out 100% in the favour of the SNP forever (it certainly is going that way currently, I'll grant you) would do a lot to dispel all those claims of hubris. Eventual hubris at any rate.
    I live here.

    I have never seen a party so toxic as Scottish Labour.

    I lived through the Tory shrink in the 80s and 90s and it was NOTHING compared to this. Tory PPCs weren't barracked in the streets, they could go on TV without random passers by yelling insults at them. The 80s/90s Tories were also not known to be completely corrupt.

    Labour have been building this for years. People in WCS knew the Labour party were corrupt, knew they gave jobs to their pals, flooded local authorities with placepeople, always say their own got a cushy number if they were unlucky. But the weighed votes were overwhelming - because "it's how my grandad voted".

    Once you break that, you break the familial voting pattern for a corrupt and broken party, it doesn't return.

    As I said. Labour are finished in Scotland.
  • FregglesFreggles Posts: 3,486
    Scott_P said:

    @SamCoatesTimes: EXC: Times / YouGov airwar tracker. Tories close the gap, only behind Labour by 2 points (yesterday was 9 pt lead) http://t.co/mZ1lDVq5G4

    Is that meaningful as a daily metric?
  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @SamCoatesTimes: Times / YouGov For the first time we reveal what counts as a Tory positive and Tory negative - see (small type) chart http://t.co/6cI1CUcxSa
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
    Labour in Scotland hate the SNP.

    Labour outside Scotland. Meh, not so much.

    Without SLAB MPs the view of Labour - especially as Labour in Scotland are finished with no way back - is going to change (if it ever was actually anti-SNP).

    Labour without SLAB can happily work with the SNP. At least till they see what the SNP will do to them in Westminster.
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    edited April 2015
    What's the general feeling about YouGov's & BRG? I'm generally ignoring YouGov due to how the methodology change seems to have killed the movement - which at first didn't matter but now is 2%(?) off the rest of the polls on the ELBOW. Would I bet correct in recalling that when the did the change they stated that it was supposed to measure swing in opinion? In which case the fact that they have a self-selecting politically active (therefore more decided) panel makes their polls fairly pointless. (Also, it polling 7x a week has completely changed the narrative of the election - otherwise the media would be talking about how large the Con lead would be.)

    In regards to BRG I thought I saw someone mention that they may randomly select emails to poll - is this correct, if not does anyone actually know their methodology?
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,742
    trublue said:

    I'm amazed the FTSE has held together so well with all the fear and uncertainty about the outcome of this election. I'd say it's definitely hurting the Conservartives. If the stock market slumped and we saw sterling weaken it might sharpen a significant number of voters minds about the need to deliver a decisive result next week. Maybe we might see some speculation next week sending markets tumbling, but by then its impact will be limited because of the mass of postal votes already returned.

    Nah anyone remotely concerned about that sort of stuff will have decided to vote already.
  • AlistairAlistair Posts: 23,670
    I found this interesting, LD and Tories Tied for "would not vote"

    https://twitter.com/KevinJPringle/status/593481917497999360
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,742
    MikeL said:

    From previous thread

    I've also worked out new regional allocations based on a 600 seat parliament (as planned unless the boundary review rules are changed or it is voted down)

    East of England - 56 seats (current entitlement 58)
    E Midlands - 43 seats (current entitlement 46)
    London - 68 seats (current entitlement 73)
    North East - 25 seats (current entitlement 29)
    North West - 68 seats (current entitlement 75)
    South East - 83 seats (current entitlement 84)
    South West - 53 seats (current entitlement 55)
    W Midlands - 53 seats (current entitlement 59)
    Yorkshire - 50 seats (current entitlement 54)
    Scotland - 53 seats (current entitlement 59)
    Wales - 29 seats (current entitlement 40)
    N Ireland - 16 seats (current entitlement 18)

    Total - 597 seats (currently 650). I think the reason it is less than 600 is that special provisions are made for Isle of Wight to have 2 seats and for Orkney/Shetland and Western Isles

    Wales loses the most due to the end of its over-representation. I'm surprised Scotland isn't going up due to the referendum but I think Scotland's population is growing less slowly than other parts of the UK.

    Very interesting data on previous thread re individual constituency data.

    We know East London is the fastest growing part of the UK. So East Ham and West Ham should be right at the top of the list - indeed their electorates should have grown most since 2010.

    The fact they aren't there shows Individual Voter Registration has pushed people off the list.

    It won't matter, of course, in East Ham and West Ham but if it's happened nationwide then it can only hurt Lab and help Con.

    However the figures will have risen with the late rush to register - we really do need to see final numbers and compare to 2010.
    Look at Wales lol
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Dair said:

    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
    Labour in Scotland hate the SNP.

    Labour outside Scotland. Meh, not so much.

    Without SLAB MPs the view of Labour - especially as Labour in Scotland are finished with no way back - is going to change (if it ever was actually anti-SNP).

    Labour without SLAB can happily work with the SNP. At least till they see what the SNP will do to them in Westminster.
    Except there's a Holyrood election in 12 months time, as much as you're glossing over and ignoring that fact.

    Neither LAB nor the SNP are going to concede Holyrood to the other without a fight. And the fight is not going to be pretty.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108

    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    How does that disagree with anything I said, or mean that I'm missing the point.

    Labour won't just acknowledge they're finished in Scotland, especially in Holyrood which has a form of Proportional Representation so no party is ever truly finished (even the Tories have 15 MSPs).

    So once we head into the Holyrood election campaign Labour are locked into an existential battle to the death with a party that (as you're showing) wants to destroy not just the UK but Labour themselves.

    And supposedly these parties are going to be working together amicably running the country? I don't think so.
    Actually you can be wiped out in AMS D'Hondt.

    Liberals were 17 in 1999, 17 in 2003, 16 in 2007, 5 in 2011.

    AMS D'Hondt has a 5% threshold. Liberals could be wiped next election. They probably will be down to 1 (Northern Scotland List).

    Labour will be reduced to 13 next election. Thats from 56 in 1999, 50 in 2003, 46 in 2007 and 37 last time.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Dair said:

    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
    Labour in Scotland hate the SNP.

    Labour outside Scotland. Meh, not so much.

    Without SLAB MPs the view of Labour - especially as Labour in Scotland are finished with no way back - is going to change (if it ever was actually anti-SNP).

    Labour without SLAB can happily work with the SNP. At least till they see what the SNP will do to them in Westminster.
    Same voter pool, same unionised members, same left wing benefit splurging policies - what's to fall out about ?
  • Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
    As a Tory i dont have a gut feel for Scottish politics-but surely you can do a deal??

    Is the the danger for Labour that great?
  • MontyMonty Posts: 346
    Dair said:

    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
    Labour in Scotland hate the SNP.

    Labour outside Scotland. Meh, not so much.

    Without SLAB MPs the view of Labour - especially as Labour in Scotland are finished with no way back - is going to change (if it ever was actually anti-SNP).

    Labour without SLAB can happily work with the SNP. At least till they see what the SNP will do to them in Westminster.
    No. Scottish Labour are at the heart of Labour. You wound them you wound us. The SNP have stolen Labour's clothes temporarily. But the SNP are nationalists and nationalists will steal whoever's clothes to seem popular.
    We won't forget where our loyalties lie and we believe in the UK. You do not.
    We know that any attempt at cooperation would end in disaster for us.
    Therefore it will not happen.
    Despite what the Nats say, it will not happen.
  • From those YouGov tweets, mention of a ComRes mail poll coming at 10?
  • Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
    As a Tory i dont have a gut feel for Scottish politics-but surely you can do a deal??

    Is the the danger for Labour that great?

    Edit
    Southern Tory
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    There's a new ComRes at 10?
  • RodCrosbyRodCrosby Posts: 7,737

    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    How does that disagree with anything I said, or mean that I'm missing the point.

    Labour won't just acknowledge they're finished in Scotland, especially in Holyrood which has a form of Proportional Representation so no party is ever truly finished (even the Tories have 15 MSPs).

    So once we head into the Holyrood election campaign Labour are locked into an existential battle to the death with a party that (as you're showing) wants to destroy not just the UK but Labour themselves.

    And supposedly these parties are going to be working together amicably running the country? I don't think so.
    They don't have to work together.

    Just vote together. Against the Tories. Once.

    And Miliband is PM.

    Then once more to keep him there.

    As their prisoner...
  • ArtistArtist Posts: 1,893
    Yes.

    James Chapman (Mail) @jameschappers · 1h 1 hour ago
    Sifting through numbers for our latest from @ComResPolls. With a week to go, is anyone breaking away? Results at 10pm on @MailOnline
  • MontyMonty Posts: 346

    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    My suspicion is that despite the occasional comment about 'no-one having voted for this government', that would not apply to an anti-Tory majority, as that everyone voting for a party that is not the Tory party would obviously therefore automatically be fine with any arrangement that keeps the Tories out. Indeed, clearly this should have been the case last time, were it not for the traitors of the LDs, who were duty bound to do so.

    (Yes, that was a strawman statement, but most people using the 'no-one voted for this' argument will be no strangers to such tactics)

    Personally lack of legitimacy is not so much of an issue for me - we have the system we have and it can deliver those sorts of outcome; if we don't want that we can change the system - but the chaos line does work on me a little. That said, its impact is blunted a bit as although it appears the permutations are even more chaotic this time around, and include a party which advocates for the break up of the UK which adds something new to the mix, the relative harmony of this coalition mitigates the fear of chaos a little too,
    I don't think the Tories on here realise how much Labour hate the SNP. We are not bedfellows. They want to end the UK. We do not. We cannot form an alliance with them for that reason. It is non-negotiable and will always overshadow any attempt at compromise. Any attempt to sidestep that reality is doomed to failure and Labour know this. Another election beckons before the year is out.
    As a Tory i dont have a gut feel for Scottish politics-but surely you can do a deal??

    Is the the danger for Labour that great?
    Yes, they are. See my post below.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Dair said:

    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    How does that disagree with anything I said, or mean that I'm missing the point.

    Labour won't just acknowledge they're finished in Scotland, especially in Holyrood which has a form of Proportional Representation so no party is ever truly finished (even the Tories have 15 MSPs).

    So once we head into the Holyrood election campaign Labour are locked into an existential battle to the death with a party that (as you're showing) wants to destroy not just the UK but Labour themselves.

    And supposedly these parties are going to be working together amicably running the country? I don't think so.
    Actually you can be wiped out in AMS D'Hondt.

    Liberals were 17 in 1999, 17 in 2003, 16 in 2007, 5 in 2011.

    AMS D'Hondt has a 5% threshold. Liberals could be wiped next election. They probably will be down to 1 (Northern Scotland List).

    Labour will be reduced to 13 next election. Thats from 56 in 1999, 50 in 2003, 46 in 2007 and 37 last time.
    Do you think Labour are willing and content to be reduced like that without a fight?

    They're going to want to fight and fight hard. The SNP are going to want to fight and fight hard. Probably dirty on both sides. But they're supposed to be playing happy families in Westminster, while one partner in the happy family wants a divorce and to leave Westminster.

    It doesn't work.
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    James Cook ‏@BBCJamesCook ·
    The Scottish Sun newspaper urges its readers to vote SNP: “a new hope for our country”. #ge2015

  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    #SunNation ‏@SunNation ·
    BREAKING: The Sun backs the Conservatives: http://sunnation.co/6015AKnf

  • Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @SunNation: BREAKING: The Sun backs the Conservatives: http://t.co/Mw5O5AmU5Y http://t.co/Fyphu5KMIX
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/ed-miliband/11570745/The-price-that-Ed-Miliband-is-prepared-to-pay-to-win-the-Muslim-vote.html

    The Labour leader's pledge to redefine Islamophobia as an aggravated crime will be cheered by child sex-grooming gangs in Rotherham and election-stealers in Tower Hamlets



  • From the last thread, I actually think Clegg is probably the biggest chance the Tories have of forming a coalition with the LDs. I doubt any other LD, is going to be as keen as Clegg - the only other option would be Alexander, who is likely to lose his seat too.

    Laws?-may loose
    Lamb??- Not sure
  • Eh_ehm_a_ehEh_ehm_a_eh Posts: 552
    Sunday Post verdict, careful now.
  • PeterCPeterC Posts: 1,275
    Pulpstar said:

    trublue said:

    I'm amazed the FTSE has held together so well with all the fear and uncertainty about the outcome of this election. I'd say it's definitely hurting the Conservartives. If the stock market slumped and we saw sterling weaken it might sharpen a significant number of voters minds about the need to deliver a decisive result next week. Maybe we might see some speculation next week sending markets tumbling, but by then its impact will be limited because of the mass of postal votes already returned.

    Nah anyone remotely concerned about that sort of stuff will have decided to vote already.
    Markets anticipate and discount the future. Some of the speculation on this thread is frankly surreal. Perhaps the outcome will be much more benign.

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,232

    twitter.com/SunNation/status/593516865395101699

    Baby Call me Dave!
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    RodCrosby said:

    Dair said:

    With Holyrood 2016 it doesn't seem plausible for Lab+SNP to play happy families for a long time. As soon as this election is over they need to turn their guns on each other - that doesn't make for happy bedfellows.

    Perhaps time for a new acronym: EICIPMBNFL - Ed Is Crap Is PM But Not For Long

    I think maybe you're missing the point.

    Labour are finished in Scotland.

    Finished.

    Not down, not hurt, not troubled. They are finished. They have no way back, they will never get significant support again in Scotland. They will lose seats and the Conservatives will become the second largest party at Holyrood while Labour try to defend third place to the Greens (which they will lose the election after).

    Again. Labour are finished in Scotland.
    How does that disagree with anything I said, or mean that I'm missing the point.

    Labour won't just acknowledge they're finished in Scotland, especially in Holyrood which has a form of Proportional Representation so no party is ever truly finished (even the Tories have 15 MSPs).

    So once we head into the Holyrood election campaign Labour are locked into an existential battle to the death with a party that (as you're showing) wants to destroy not just the UK but Labour themselves.

    And supposedly these parties are going to be working together amicably running the country? I don't think so.
    They don't have to work together.

    Just vote together. Against the Tories. Once.

    And Miliband is PM.

    Then once more to keep him there.

    As their prisoner...
    It takes more than just confidence votes to run the country effectively. Hence why I said "amicably running the country".

    Its not just prison, it'll be torture.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,624

    Tonight's #Newsnight index - CON down 1, SNP up 1

    https://twitter.com/BBCNewsnight/status/593511112491945984/photo/1

    Interesting that the seat gap has closed in their prediction, despite polls being better for Tories over the past 5 days.
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    Monty said:

    Dair said:

    Monty said:

    kle4 said:

    Moses_ said:

    Slightly OT but given the lefties on here have constantly stated that this present government rule without a majority and lack legitimacy, how do they square that with the possibility a Labour minority government of which they seem quite happy at the moment.......?

    Snip.
    Labour in Scotland hate the SNP.

    Labour outside Scotland. Meh, not so much.

    Without SLAB MPs the view of Labour - especially as Labour in Scotland are finished with no way back - is going to change (if it ever was actually anti-SNP).

    Labour without SLAB can happily work with the SNP. At least till they see what the SNP will do to them in Westminster.
    No. Scottish Labour are at the heart of Labour. You wound them you wound us. The SNP have stolen Labour's clothes temporarily. But the SNP are nationalists and nationalists will steal whoever's clothes to seem popular.
    We won't forget where our loyalties lie and we believe in the UK. You do not.
    We know that any attempt at cooperation would end in disaster for us.
    Therefore it will not happen.
    Despite what the Nats say, it will not happen.
    I completely agree that a Lab-SNP coalition would be the end for Labour, on both sides of the border. However I'm not sure that the Labour head honchos will take that into consideration. I get a feeling that they will do whatever to get themselves into power, even if it means that it may be their last time ever.
  • Danny565Danny565 Posts: 8,091
    For those who missed it, I know you can't bear to miss out:

    Presenting DISASTER (Danny's Inexplicably Shit Attempt at Simulating The Election Result)

    Starting with predictions of Lib Dem seats

    LIB DEM HOLDS (17)
    Sutton & Cheam, Eastbourne, Eastleigh, Carshalton & Wallington, Berwickshire, Cambridge, Southport, Thornbury & Yate, Colchester, Lewes, Caithness, Twickenham, Ceredigion, North Norfolk, Westmorland & Lonsdale, Sheffield Hallam (narrowly), Orkney & Shetland


    LABOUR GAINS FROM LIB DEMS (12)
    Norwich South, Bradford East, Brent Central, Manchester Withington, Burnley, Birmingham Yardley, Redcar, Hornsey & Wood Green, Cardiff Central, Bermondsey, Bristol West, Leeds North West


    TORY GAINS FROM LIB DEMS (20)
    Solihull, Mid Dorset, Wells, St Austell & Newquay, Somerton & Frome, St Ives, Chippenham, Cheadle, North Cornwall, Taunton Deane, Berwick-upon-Tweed, Torbay, Cheltenham, Brecon & Radnorshire, North Devon, Portsmouth South, Kingston & Surbiton, Hazel Grove, Yeovil, Bath


    SNP GAINS FROM LIB DEMS (8)
    East Dunbartonshire, Argyll & Bute, Aberdeenshire West, Edinburgh West, Gordon, Inverness, North East Fife, Ross Skye & Lochaber
This discussion has been closed.