So how does this explain Great Grimsby, Cannock Chase, Great Yarmouth ? Is Labour losing votes where it doesn't need them ? Or, is Lord A polls just plain cobblers !
I think no discussion re the latest Miliband link is advisable...
And so to the bigger question, namely who would play whom in Nicola Sturgeon: The Movie. The starring role, by common consent, would go to Dame Helen Mirren or, if the producers insisted on a Scot, Elaine C. Smith. Jim Murphy would be played by Peter Capaldi from The Thick Of It, or Jim Carrey, or (more encouragingly) Ewan McGregor. Sue Perkins or Rhona Cameron would play Ruth Davidson, and Scottish Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie would be portrayed by “a gentlemanly quiet person” like Geoffrey Palmer or Ashley from Emmerdale. David Cameron would be Hugh Grant or Colin Firth. What about Ed Miliband? “Woody Allen”. Ooft.
That polling still suggests to me that UKIP will win Castle Point. But really surprised they're that far behind in Grimsby. Having said that Ashcroft polls are never too favourable towards UKIP.
What is it with the Greens? Their policies and leader are both mental. Can we take it these are lefties unpersuaded by Ed Miliband? Or SNP fifth columnists south of the border?
Last few weeks Marginals Con-Lab swing in ranked order:
8.5 NW City of Chester 8.0 YH Great Grimsby – LAB SEAT 7.5 NW Crewe and Nantwich 7.0 GL Finchley and Golders Green 7.0 SW Bristol W – LIB DEM SEAT 6.5 WM Cannock Chase 6.0 EM Milton Keynes South 5.5 GL Harrow East 5.5 NW Wirral west 5.0 EM Nuneaton 5.0 GL Croydon Central 5.0 SE Hove 5.0 NW Rossendale and Darwen 5.0 NW South Ribble 4.5 YH Colne Valley 4.0 EE Great Yarmouth 4.0 NW Morecambe and Lunesdale 4.0 SE Rochester ad Strood 4.0 SW South Swindon 3.5 SE Southampton Itchen - LAB SEAT 3.5 EM High Peak 3.5 YH Cleethorpes 3.0 NE Stockton South 3.0 WM Dudley South 3.0 WM Halesowen 2.0 NW Pendle 1.5 YH Pudsey 1.5 SW Bristol NW 1.0 SE Dover 0.5 EE Harlow 0.5 EE Thurrock 0.5 EM Loughborough 0.5 NW Blackpool North 0.5 SW Gloucester 0.5 SW Worcester 0.0 EE Castle Point -2.0 SW Kingswood -3.5 SW NE Somerset
"And so to the bigger question, namely who would play whom in Nicola Sturgeon: The Movie. The starring role, by common consent, would go to Dame Helen Mirren or, if the producers insisted on a Scot, Elaine C. Smith. Jim Murphy would be played by Peter Capaldi from The Thick Of It, or Jim Carrey, or (more encouragingly) Ewan McGregor. Sue Perkins or Rhona Cameron would play Ruth Davidson, and Scottish Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie would be portrayed by “a gentlemanly quiet person” like Geoffrey Palmer or Ashley from Emmerdale. David Cameron would be Hugh Grant or Colin Firth. What about Ed Miliband? “Woody Allen”. Ooft."
I think no discussion re the latest Miliband link is advisable...
And so to the bigger question, namely who would play whom in Nicola Sturgeon: The Movie. The starring role, by common consent, would go to Dame Helen Mirren or, if the producers insisted on a Scot, Elaine C. Smith.
Mr. Brom, think I read on here that the UKIP candidate in Grimsby was rubbish on EU fishing quota stuff, and that's behind the purple slump.
Yes I get the impression Ayling isn't the strongest candidate, and her Tory background won't help. I was thinking this might be cancelled out by the Labour candidate Melanie Onn being the career politican sort who wouldn't impress the locals. Will scan over the raw data later today.
So how does this explain Great Grimsby, Cannock Chase, Great Yarmouth ? Is Labour losing votes where it doesn't need them ? Or, is Lord A polls just plain cobblers !
With the exception of Castle Point, Labour is winning the ground game in these seats.
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
FPT: Another part of our business does a lot of work with the EU. A mug has appeared in our kitchen with "Guardian of Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law" on it in a jaunty colourful script, as well as the logo of the Council of Europe, and the same message in French.
Weighing up whether to ever-so-accidentally knock it off the table...
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
Mr. Anorak, that's vomit-inducingly horrendous. As such, it's a hazard to human health, and your duty to a safe and healthy workplace is to harm it beyond repair.
A sensationally good result for the Blues, especially after the equally disappointing earlier one for them from Populus. A word of caution however, it does appear that the Communists Greens, up by a very dubious 3%, may have benefited at Labour's expense, whilst the Tories appear to have nicked 1% - 2% from UKIP.
However however I wonder if Labour are now handing out too many baubles, they start to look a bit iffy: like the funny man who keeps giving you more and more sweets, if only you will get in his car...
By pointing at the doll, can you show me where the creepy man offered to reduce your Stamp Duty to zero?
Even though UKIP is falling rapidly in the constituency polls, that fall has not benefited the Tories, instead it splits evenly between them and Labour so the swings are pretty much the same. Today on the 3 Tory seats the swing to LAB is 3.5% on average, the same as the previous 23 constituency polls of Tory seats since the campaign began. Which brings us to the paradox of Lord A.
On his constituency polls, Labour are heading for 50 seat gains from the Tories. On his national polls, the Tories are on to a majority.
There is something odd about the Ashcroft polls, does he use the same company for the national and constituency polls? In this group Cannock Chase has a 6.5% swing con - lab, Gt Grimsby 8% con - lab & Gt Yarmouth 4% con - lab but his national poll about 1% con - lab. That cant be accounted for by a better ground operation.
On any of the swings in the constituency polls the tories cant get enough seats to hang on, even if they hold seats like Gt Yarmouth
Only three companies conduct phone polling (assuming Ashcroft uses a variety), I don't think a 2 to 1 Conservative/Labour split with phone polls is enough to split the two methods. The Labour lead versus Conservative lead difference is specific to the polling companies themselves.
So how does this explain Great Grimsby, Cannock Chase, Great Yarmouth ? Is Labour losing votes where it doesn't need them ? Or, is Lord A polls just plain cobblers !
Margin of error, combined with the fact that shifts in constituency vote shares aren't uniform, particularly where UKIP are polling well.
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
There is no evidence that the Conservatives are doing better nationally in the South West than elsewhere .
Cannock Chase shows graphically where the tory problem is. Actually quite worrying for Con. And for UKIP, who could well cop part of the blame for letting in the fragrant Nicola.
Mr. Anorak, that's vomit-inducingly horrendous. As such, it's a hazard to human health, and your duty to a safe and healthy workplace is to harm it beyond repair.
I certainly hope it conforms to the Caffinated Beverage Consumption Receptacle (Standardised Weights and Measures) Directive.
However however I wonder if Labour are now handing out too many baubles, they start to look a bit iffy: like the funny man who keeps giving you more and more sweets, if only you will get in his car...
By pointing at the doll, can you show me where the creepy man offered to reduce your Stamp Duty to zero?
That comment is just ... so wrong. But very funny.
A sensationally good result for the Blues, especially after the equally disappointing earlier one for them from Populus. A word of caution however, it does appear that the Communists Greens, up by a very dubious 3%, may have benefited at Labour's expense, whilst the Tories appear to have nicked 1% - 2% from UKIP.
I wonder if these latest phone polls prove to be more accurate the YG etc it will give the lie to the notion of a crap campaign by the Tories. Could indicate a growing gulf between the twitterati in the 'village' and the real people in the country.
Cannock Chase shows graphically where the tory problem is. Actually quite worrying for Con. And for UKIP, who could well cop part of the blame for letting in the fragrant Nicola.
The Clinton Foundation is in full defensive flow concerning information in a book which has not yet been published - Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer. It's due out May 5th.
To be fair, Schweizer has not claimed to have direct evidence of any quid pro quo but merely points out the facts and connections.
As a result the Foundation has announced it will be refiling several years of tax returns.
If Schweizer's information is accurate, it looks like the Clinton Campaign and Foundation might have some issues to answer.
Even though UKIP is falling rapidly in the constituency polls, that fall has not benefited the Tories, instead it splits evenly between them and Labour so the swings are pretty much the same. Today on the 3 Tory seats the swing to LAB is 3.5% on average, the same as the previous 23 constituency polls of Tory seats since the campaign began. Which brings us to the paradox of Lord A.
On his constituency polls, Labour are heading for 50 seat gains from the Tories. On his national polls, the Tories are on to a majority.
Some of those contituency polls are a few months old, though? If all re-polled, wonder if we'd see a similar picture re. the national poll
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
The SW only accounts for 8% of the UK population and 10% of the population of England. The Tories would have to be doing exceptionally well there to offset a drop everywhere else
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
There is no evidence that the Conservatives are doing better nationally in the South West than elsewhere .
That's a nice security blanket you have. It looks lovely and warm, apart from the large gaping holes in it.
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
There is no evidence that the Conservatives are doing better nationally in the South West than elsewhere .
Popping over to do some door knocking In Kingston tonight..i will be interested to see what the vibe is like. Not saying Davey will deffo lose but it is tighter there than the last Ashcroft poll in Nov 14
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
The England only swing in Ashcroft's national poll is 3.25%, so not that different from his constituency polls. The incorrect Wales and Scotland sub samples can mess up the topline of phone polls quite a bit.
Throughout the campaign, telephone polls have given the following results:-
Ashcroft Con +2%, Tie, Con +4%, Con +6%.
ComRes Con +4%, Con +1%, Con +4%.
ICM Con +6%, Con +2%, Con +3%.
MORI Lab +2%.
An average Conservative lead of 3%. That's a very different picture from the internet panels. If this was 2005, when Yougov were the only internet pollster. discussion would now be centering on whether the Conservatives would win enough seats to form a government. No one would be doubting they'd come first.
Mr. D, at school a classmate of mine was a barman. When filling out his university forms he entered his occupation as 'beverage dispensing technician'.
Even though UKIP is falling rapidly in the constituency polls, that fall has not benefited the Tories, instead it splits evenly between them and Labour so the swings are pretty much the same. Today on the 3 Tory seats the swing to LAB is 3.5% on average, the same as the previous 23 constituency polls of Tory seats since the campaign began. Which brings us to the paradox of Lord A.
On his constituency polls, Labour are heading for 50 seat gains from the Tories. On his national polls, the Tories are on to a majority.
Some of those contituency polls are a few months old, though? If all re-polled, wonder if we'd see a similar picture re. the national poll
The clue is "since the campaign began". Since the beginning of this month there have been 26 constituency polls in Tory seats of straight Tory vs Lab fights, all of them show a pretty similar picture with the average swing to Labour of 3% ex-London and 7% in London, that is 50 Labour gains from the Tories.
Cannock Chase shows graphically where the tory problem is. Actually quite worrying for Con. And for UKIP, who could well cop part of the blame for letting in the fragrant Nicola.
Probably, but 2/1 on the Tories in light of Q1 looks fair.
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
There is no evidence that the Conservatives are doing better nationally in the South West than elsewhere .
Bristol NW; Kingswood; Somerset NE; Camborne & Redruth; Taunton Deane; Mid Dorset and North Poole
I suspect the Blues would be a mile ahead in Truro and Falmouth, they could well be knocking on the door in Bath too. Only the stickiest of yellow peril incumbents will survive the Bluewash down there.
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
There is no evidence that the Conservatives are doing better nationally in the South West than elsewhere .
That's a nice security blanket you have. It looks lovely and warm, apart from the large gaping holes in it.
What gaping hole , on the last thread SeanT bigged up the Wales and South West subsample this week with Conservatives at 40% , he conveniently ignored last weeks equivalent sub sample with them at meltdown in Wales and South West at just 23% . Sub samples are no evidence for anything and the likelihood is that the Conservatives are doing no better or worse in the South West than nationally .
Even though UKIP is falling rapidly in the constituency polls, that fall has not benefited the Tories, instead it splits evenly between them and Labour so the swings are pretty much the same. Today on the 3 Tory seats the swing to LAB is 3.5% on average, the same as the previous 23 constituency polls of Tory seats since the campaign began. Which brings us to the paradox of Lord A.
On his constituency polls, Labour are heading for 50 seat gains from the Tories. On his national polls, the Tories are on to a majority.
Some of those contituency polls are a few months old, though? If all re-polled, wonder if we'd see a similar picture re. the national poll
No these three polls are published today, the fieldwork a couple of days old at most. It is most odd, not within moe. Either the methodology for the constituency polls is wrong or his national polls are. 11 days to go to find out which.
YG were spot on for Euros but that was PR; this is FPTP. Different gravy required.
My own experience is that people focus the mind on the Monday before the following Thursday. So, this Wednesday polls, the phone variety, will be closest to the outcome.
But 1992 proved that theory wrong. So, likely Weds phone polls will predicted most votes but not 100% . Seats of course is a different matter. Only England matters. Labour will have most seats if their vote % is same as Tories in England. Anything less and Tories will be biggest party. Tories need plus 12% for majority in Eng. Unlikely.
"But that's just two polls. All the evidence from recent polling is that there's a fundamental difference in outcome being generated by methodological differences [i.e. one or both of the methods are wrong], so I don't think the basic MOE statistical approach works at all."
Yes - that is another source of error so the MOEs are even larger. It just shows how misleading a single number from a small sample poll is. One needs to look at quite large ranges - even larger than the ones I'm generating using the basic MOE statistical approach to allow for errors in methodology..
Out of interest, the new Ashcroft national poll has a sample size of 558 and an MOE of 4.1% The confidence limits on Con are 31.9% to 40.1%. On Lab the limits are 25.9% to 34.1%. Either could be in the lead.
If I look at all the limits of the three polls, the confidence limits that are consistent with all three are: Con 31.9% to 35.4% Lab 33.6% to 34.1%
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
There is no evidence that the Conservatives are doing better nationally in the South West than elsewhere .
That's a nice security blanket you have. It looks lovely and warm, apart from the large gaping holes in it.
What gaping hole , on the last thread SeanT bigged up the Wales and South West subsample this week with Conservatives at 40% , he conveniently ignored last weeks equivalent sub sample with them at meltdown in Wales and South West at just 23% . Sub samples are no evidence for anything and the likelihood is that the Conservatives are doing no better or worse in the South West than nationally .
Are the LDs doing better or worse in the SW than nationally ?
Hmm. The individual seat polls show the Cons losing a substantial vote share while the national poll has them level with their 2010 score. The two are very difficult to reconcile.
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
None of these constituency polls are in the Southwest. That area is golden for the blues.
There is no evidence that the Conservatives are doing better nationally in the South West than elsewhere .
Popping over to do some door knocking In Kingston tonight..i will be interested to see what the vibe is like. Not saying Davey will deffo lose but it is tighter there than the last Ashcroft poll in Nov 14
Given up in Sutton and Cheam as well as Carshalton then Timmo . Yes I expect Kingston/Surbiton to be the tightest of the 3 seats .
In both the Ashcroft national and constituency polls the Con certainty to vote is quite a bit higher than that of Labour which may be a clue as to what will happen on the day.
Kippers need to vote tactically if they want a EU referendum.
If they want McMarxist overlords then carry on.
I wonder if this is sinking in....
I think you will find Mr. Cameron has so antagonised the Kippers, they would not trust him with a referendum.
Yes let's face it Cameron isn't that bothered about a referendum or he would have had one. If they do form a coalition with the Lib Dems 'no referendum' will no doubt be an early concession again.
Looking at the tables for the 4 constituencies what is again apparent is how the Q1 & Q2 questions are converging. A few months back there was a noticeable difference between the national & local question, not now (which makes sense). This makes the difference with his national polls even odder
Following events in Nepal on Saturday 25th April, The Bulldog Trust have set up the Nepal Earthquake Recovery Appeal 2015 fund to accept donations which will be directed towards small, grassroots NGOs working directly on the ground. The trust has close connections with Nepal through our Head of Grants and Philanthropy, Alison Marston, who was born and raised in Nepal.
Donations from individuals can be made at Nepal Earthquake Recovery Appeal 2015 (http://www.everyclick.com/nepalearthquakerecoveryappeal2015) or via bank transfer or cheque to The Bulldog Trust – Sort Code 15 99 00, Account number 10048750 (Reference: Nepal 2015).
If you would like to keep up to date with recovery efforts, please follow Alison Marston @QuakeNepal.
"But that's just two polls. All the evidence from recent polling is that there's a fundamental difference in outcome being generated by methodological differences [i.e. one or both of the methods are wrong], so I don't think the basic MOE statistical approach works at all."
Yes - that is another source of error so the MOEs are even larger. It just shows how misleading a single number from a small sample poll is. One needs to look at quite large ranges - even larger than the ones I'm generating using the basic MOE statistical approach to allow for errors in methodology..
Out of interest, the new Ashcroft national poll has a sample size of 558 and an MOE of 4.1% The confidence limits on Con are 31.9% to 40.1%. On Lab the limits are 25.9% to 34.1%. Either could be in the lead.
If I look at all the limits of the three polls, the confidence limits that are consistent with all three are: Con 31.9% to 35.4% Lab 33.6% to 34.1%
Midpoints Con 33.6% Lab 33.8%.
Is anyone the wiser?
Out of interest, the new Ashcroft national poll has a sample size of 558 and an MOE of 4.1% The confidence limits on Con are 31.9% to 40.1%. On Lab the limits are 25.9% to 34.1%. Either could be in the lead. ---------
Thanks, Barnesian. Why does anyone take Ashcroft National polls seriously ? I believe the constituency polls have a sample size of 1000.
Comments
Ashcroft national poll:
Baxter say's a Con majority of 2!
EMWNBPM or EICINPM
Is why a named poll would be useful.
And so to the bigger question, namely who would play whom in Nicola Sturgeon: The Movie. The starring role, by common consent, would go to Dame Helen Mirren or, if the producers insisted on a Scot, Elaine C. Smith. Jim Murphy would be played by Peter Capaldi from The Thick Of It, or Jim Carrey, or (more encouragingly) Ewan McGregor. Sue Perkins or Rhona Cameron would play Ruth Davidson, and Scottish Lib Dem leader Willie Rennie would be portrayed by “a gentlemanly quiet person” like Geoffrey Palmer or Ashley from Emmerdale. David Cameron would be Hugh Grant or Colin Firth. What about Ed Miliband? “Woody Allen”. Ooft.
This election is truly weird.
8.5 NW City of Chester
8.0 YH Great Grimsby – LAB SEAT
7.5 NW Crewe and Nantwich
7.0 GL Finchley and Golders Green
7.0 SW Bristol W – LIB DEM SEAT
6.5 WM Cannock Chase
6.0 EM Milton Keynes South
5.5 GL Harrow East
5.5 NW Wirral west
5.0 EM Nuneaton
5.0 GL Croydon Central
5.0 SE Hove
5.0 NW Rossendale and Darwen
5.0 NW South Ribble
4.5 YH Colne Valley
4.0 EE Great Yarmouth
4.0 NW Morecambe and Lunesdale
4.0 SE Rochester ad Strood
4.0 SW South Swindon
3.5 SE Southampton Itchen - LAB SEAT
3.5 EM High Peak
3.5 YH Cleethorpes
3.0 NE Stockton South
3.0 WM Dudley South
3.0 WM Halesowen
2.0 NW Pendle
1.5 YH Pudsey
1.5 SW Bristol NW
1.0 SE Dover
0.5 EE Harlow
0.5 EE Thurrock
0.5 EM Loughborough
0.5 NW Blackpool North
0.5 SW Gloucester
0.5 SW Worcester
0.0 EE Castle Point
-2.0 SW Kingswood
-3.5 SW NE Somerset
Woody Allen - lolz.
The online pollsters have Labour ahead, bar Survation and Opinium.
Maybe some bright spark labour spads have worked out labour is now an English party.
' Hang on a sec, Jocasta, isn;t England actually....er.....pretty conservative.'
'yikes...'
Again this raises the question, is the company doing the national poll the same as the company or companies doing the individual seat polls? Looking at this I would suggest the answer is no. The lack of transparency is quite unsatisfactory when people are betting a lot of money on these polls.
https://freehdwallpaper.in/walls/squirrel-jump-normal.jpg
Weighing up whether to ever-so-accidentally knock it off the table...
Today on the 3 Tory seats the swing to LAB is 3.5% on average, the same as the previous 23 constituency polls of Tory seats since the campaign began.
Which brings us to the paradox of Lord A.
On his constituency polls, Labour are heading for 50 seat gains from the Tories.
On his national polls, the Tories are on to a majority.
On any of the swings in the constituency polls the tories cant get enough seats to hang on, even if they hold seats like Gt Yarmouth
May2015 Election @May2015NS
Ukip fading in key seats—& Lab doing better than thought. @LordAshcroft seat polls paint diff pic to his 6pt headline
If they want McMarxist overlords then carry on.
It will now be a loss because Aidan Burley was an unmitigated disaster.
To be fair, Schweizer has not claimed to have direct evidence of any quid pro quo but merely points out the facts and connections.
As a result the Foundation has announced it will be refiling several years of tax returns.
If Schweizer's information is accurate, it looks like the Clinton Campaign and Foundation might have some issues to answer.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/27/behind-the-man-who-outed-clinton-s-cash.html
David Cameron: Hugh Grant
LOL....I know Hugh Grant's career has gone down hill, but can you imagine him signing up to play Cameron is a positive film about him?
And Reds ahead with YouGov, Populus, MORI, Panelbase and TNS?
We do need another MORI....for quality control purposes.
PS I've just completed a yougov for the British election Survey with another to follow soon. Could be a polling turning point
He is one of the old kids on the block - usually ICM for the national polls as far as I can tell, though the situation is as clear as mud.
When I see the words "Lord Ashcroft Poll" I think "This is a dog license with the word 'dog' crossed out and the word 'cat' written in in crayon."
Ashcroft Con +2%, Tie, Con +4%, Con +6%.
ComRes Con +4%, Con +1%, Con +4%.
ICM Con +6%, Con +2%, Con +3%.
MORI Lab +2%.
An average Conservative lead of 3%. That's a very different picture from the internet panels. If this was 2005, when Yougov were the only internet pollster. discussion would now be centering on whether the Conservatives would win enough seats to form a government. No one would be doubting they'd come first.
Since the beginning of this month there have been 26 constituency polls in Tory seats of straight Tory vs Lab fights, all of them show a pretty similar picture with the average swing to Labour of 3% ex-London and 7% in London, that is 50 Labour gains from the Tories.
Kingswood;
Somerset NE;
Camborne & Redruth;
Taunton Deane;
Mid Dorset and North Poole
I suspect the Blues would be a mile ahead in Truro and Falmouth, they could well be knocking on the door in Bath too. Only the stickiest of yellow peril incumbents will survive the Bluewash down there.
If they want McMarxist overlords then carry on.
I wonder if this is sinking in....
According to the focus group...
YG were spot on for Euros but that was PR; this is FPTP. Different gravy required.
My own experience is that people focus the mind on the Monday before the following Thursday. So, this Wednesday polls, the phone variety, will be closest to the outcome.
But 1992 proved that theory wrong. So, likely Weds phone polls will predicted most votes but not 100% . Seats of course is a different matter. Only England matters. Labour will have most seats if their vote % is same as Tories in England. Anything less and Tories will be biggest party. Tories need plus 12% for majority in Eng. Unlikely.
"But that's just two polls. All the evidence from recent polling is that there's a fundamental difference in outcome being generated by methodological differences [i.e. one or both of the methods are wrong], so I don't think the basic MOE statistical approach works at all."
Yes - that is another source of error so the MOEs are even larger. It just shows how misleading a single number from a small sample poll is. One needs to look at quite large ranges - even larger than the ones I'm generating using the basic MOE statistical approach to allow for errors in methodology..
Out of interest, the new Ashcroft national poll has a sample size of 558 and an MOE of 4.1%
The confidence limits on Con are 31.9% to 40.1%.
On Lab the limits are 25.9% to 34.1%. Either could be in the lead.
If I look at all the limits of the three polls, the confidence limits that are consistent with all three are:
Con 31.9% to 35.4%
Lab 33.6% to 34.1%
Midpoints Con 33.6% Lab 33.8%.
Is anyone the wiser?
4,002 adults were interviewed by telephone between 15 and 24 April 2015 in the following constituencies:
Following events in Nepal on Saturday 25th April, The Bulldog Trust have set up the Nepal Earthquake Recovery Appeal 2015 fund to accept donations which will be directed towards small, grassroots NGOs working directly on the ground. The trust has close connections with Nepal through our Head of Grants and Philanthropy, Alison Marston, who was born and raised in Nepal.
Donations from individuals can be made at Nepal Earthquake Recovery Appeal 2015 (http://www.everyclick.com/nepalearthquakerecoveryappeal2015) or via bank transfer or cheque to The Bulldog Trust – Sort Code 15 99 00, Account number 10048750 (Reference: Nepal 2015).
If you would like to keep up to date with recovery efforts, please follow Alison Marston @QuakeNepal.
*** advert off ***
http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2015/04/if-ed-miliband-makes-islamophobia-illegal-i-volunteer-to-test-the-new-law-immediately/
The confidence limits on Con are 31.9% to 40.1%.
On Lab the limits are 25.9% to 34.1%. Either could be in the lead.
---------
Thanks, Barnesian. Why does anyone take Ashcroft National polls seriously ? I believe the constituency polls have a sample size of 1000.