politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » After this week’s “pollercoaster” now YOU predict the election in PB’s Prize Competition
Using the bespoke NoJam template you will need to enter seat totals for the main parties. The winner will be the person with the smallest overall error.
F1: in the least surprising news for some time, Bahrain has indicated it doesn't want Qatar to get a race. And as Bahrain has some serious clout, I would be somewhat surprised if Qatar ended up getting one.
The pedant in me is looking at the restaurant name in the mirror Marf. I guess intended to be Wiltons. But actually Snotliw. Sounds about right.
Beat me to it!
Anorak/Patrick
I'll point it out to Her Marfness. She actually quite likes that kind of feedback - well, any feedback really, short of downright abuse - and will probably update with a corrected version later.
F1: apparently in-season helmet changes are to be banned.
Nice to see the FIA being decisive on something that matters to almost no-one and does nothing to resolve the fundamental problems regarding the financial aspect of the sport.
The pedant in me is looking at the restaurant name in the mirror Marf. I guess intended to be Wiltons. But actually Snotliw. Sounds about right.
Beat me to it!
Anorak/Patrick
I'll point it out to Her Marfness. She actually quite likes that kind of feedback - well, any feedback really, short of downright abuse - and will probably update with a corrected version later.
Maybe it was intentional? Snotliw sounds satirical!
Cameron could never get the 43% who backed JM4PM including an extraordinary personal vote in his constituency. Let's compare their personal votes 1992 vs 2010.
Major - 48662 (66%/52%) Cameron - 33973 (59%/43%)
That's total votes followed by the % of the vote they got and the percentage of registered voters who supported them. Amidst all the fuss last week about the Tory fundraiser I thought a vital point was missed. Previous Tory PMs may have cultivated the rich or admired 'buccaneering businessmen' but they were always quite careful about their own image. The one nation tradition that sustained them up to Heath, followed by Thatcher who was always the disciplinarian school marm even if her policies made loads a'money possible and Major was the ordinary bloke from Brixton. That care seems to have been completely lost under Cameron and Osborne. Perhaps they thought if it was okay for New Labour to have an unapologetic appreciation of wealth, why not them? That carelessness could be their undoing.
Pulpstar and richard prew have mucked up the average by failing to read the question.
Indeed we have, any chance to redo it ?
Unless there is an imminent Plaid Cymru/Respect surge I'm not winning.
I'll drop Mark an email and he can delete your entry first entry
In the meantime if you submit your correct entry now as Pulpstar Final, that should fix it
There seems to be a typo on yours too - Ukip "8" ?!?
Yeah, UKIP to take the following seats.
Clacton, Thanet South, Boston, Great Grimsby, Great Yarmouth, Thurrock, Castle Point, another Northern Labour seat, and it pains me to say this, Rochester & Strood.
Cameron could never get the 43% who backed JM4PM including an extraordinary personal vote in his constituency. Let's compare their personal votes 1992 vs 2010.
Major - 48662 (66%/52%) Cameron - 33973 (59%/43%)
That's total votes followed by the % of the vote they got and the percentage of registered voters who supported them. Amidst all the fuss last week about the Tory fundraiser I thought a vital point was missed. Previous Tory PMs may have cultivated the rich or admired 'buccaneering businessmen' but they were always quite careful about their own image. The one nation tradition that sustained them up to Heath, followed by Thatcher who was always the disciplinarian school marm even if her policies made loads a'money possible and Major was the ordinary bloke from Brixton. That care seems to have been completely lost under Cameron and Osborne. Perhaps they thought if it was okay for New Labour to have an unapologetic appreciation of wealth, why not them? That carelessness could be their undoing.
There's no doubt that John Major had an enormous personal vote in Huntingdon.
Pulpstar and richard prew have mucked up the average by failing to read the question.
Indeed we have, any chance to redo it ?
Unless there is an imminent Plaid Cymru/Respect surge I'm not winning.
I'll drop Mark an email and he can delete your entry first entry
In the meantime if you submit your correct entry now as Pulpstar Final, that should fix it
There seems to be a typo on yours too - Ukip "8" ?!?
Yeah, UKIP to take the following seats.
Clacton, Thanet South, Boston, Great Grimsby, Great Yarmouth, Thurrock, Castle Point, another Northern Labour seat, and it pains me to say this, Rochester & Strood.
People say this election is unpredictable but something along the lines of: [Lab 259] + 30 Con + 10 LD -20 SNP = 279 seats [Con 304] - 30 Lab + 10 LD -5 UKIP = 279 seats
seems obvious at the moment. The SNP gains from Labour have the potential to be higher.
Pulpstar and richard prew have mucked up the average by failing to read the question.
Indeed we have, any chance to redo it ?
Unless there is an imminent Plaid Cymru/Respect surge I'm not winning.
I'll drop Mark an email and he can delete your entry first entry
In the meantime if you submit your correct entry now as Pulpstar Final, that should fix it
There seems to be a typo on yours too - Ukip "8" ?!?
Yeah, UKIP to take the following seats.
Clacton, Thanet South, Boston, Great Grimsby, Great Yarmouth, Thurrock, Castle Point, another Northern Labour seat, and it pains me to say this, Rochester & Strood.
You and MikeK seem to have the same prediction...
Lolz, MikeK's been on the waccy baccy and said UKIP on for 102 seats and that by May, 100+ seats will be at evens.
Pulpstar and richard prew have mucked up the average by failing to read the question.
Indeed we have, any chance to redo it ?
Unless there is an imminent Plaid Cymru/Respect surge I'm not winning.
I'll drop Mark an email and he can delete your entry first entry
In the meantime if you submit your correct entry now as Pulpstar Final, that should fix it
There seems to be a typo on yours too - Ukip "8" ?!?
Yeah, UKIP to take the following seats.
Clacton, Thanet South, Boston, Great Grimsby, Great Yarmouth, Thurrock, Castle Point, another Northern Labour seat, and it pains me to say this, Rochester & Strood.
Pulpstar and richard prew have mucked up the average by failing to read the question.
Indeed we have, any chance to redo it ?
Unless there is an imminent Plaid Cymru/Respect surge I'm not winning.
I'll drop Mark an email and he can delete your entry first entry
In the meantime if you submit your correct entry now as Pulpstar Final, that should fix it
There seems to be a typo on yours too - Ukip "8" ?!?
Yeah, UKIP to take the following seats.
Clacton, Thanet South, Boston, Great Grimsby, Great Yarmouth, Thurrock, Castle Point, another Northern Labour seat, and it pains me to say this, Rochester & Strood.
Pulpstar and richard prew have mucked up the average by failing to read the question.
Indeed we have, any chance to redo it ?
Unless there is an imminent Plaid Cymru/Respect surge I'm not winning.
I'll drop Mark an email and he can delete your entry first entry
In the meantime if you submit your correct entry now as Pulpstar Final, that should fix it
There seems to be a typo on yours too - Ukip "8" ?!?
Yeah, UKIP to take the following seats.
Clacton, Thanet South, Boston, Great Grimsby, Great Yarmouth, Thurrock, Castle Point, another Northern Labour seat, and it pains me to say this, Rochester & Strood.
Labour lead in ELBOW so far this week up to 1.4% inc. last night's YG and TNS!
Super-ELBOW for February so far, also 1.4% lead (cf. 1.1% for all of January).
According to Lewis Baston, the reason for TNS's low Conservative score (and high UKIP score) is that they weight to the EU election results. Everyone else (apart from MORI) weights to the last general election.
Pulpstar and richard prew have mucked up the average by failing to read the question.
Indeed we have, any chance to redo it ?
Unless there is an imminent Plaid Cymru/Respect surge I'm not winning.
I'll drop Mark an email and he can delete your entry first entry
In the meantime if you submit your correct entry now as Pulpstar Final, that should fix it
There seems to be a typo on yours too - Ukip "8" ?!?
Yeah, UKIP to take the following seats.
Clacton, Thanet South, Boston, Great Grimsby, Great Yarmouth, Thurrock, Castle Point, another Northern Labour seat, and it pains me to say this, Rochester & Strood.
That's not 8. That's 9...??
He's in denial about R&S...
That's more like it.
I will be directing my 8 week sabbatical in April and May to help the Tories retain seats like Pudsey
Removing the seven entries that total 100 (those who are forecasting share of vote instead of seats) and removing MikeL for obvious reasons, the average after 48 entries are:
Con 290 (SPIN 282) Lab 275 (SPIN 278) LibDeb 28 (SPIN 28) UKIP 4 (SPIN 7) Green 1 SNP 34 (SPIN 37)
Cameron could never get the 43% who backed JM4PM including an extraordinary personal vote in his constituency. Let's compare their personal votes 1992 vs 2010.
Major - 48662 (66%/52%) Cameron - 33973 (59%/43%)
That's total votes followed by the % of the vote they got and the percentage of registered voters who supported them. Amidst all the fuss last week about the Tory fundraiser I thought a vital point was missed. Previous Tory PMs may have cultivated the rich or admired 'buccaneering businessmen' but they were always quite careful about their own image. The one nation tradition that sustained them up to Heath, followed by Thatcher who was always the disciplinarian school marm even if her policies made loads a'money possible and Major was the ordinary bloke from Brixton. That care seems to have been completely lost under Cameron and Osborne. Perhaps they thought if it was okay for New Labour to have an unapologetic appreciation of wealth, why not them? That carelessness could be their undoing.
There's no doubt that John Major had an enormous personal vote in Huntingdon.
True. But the comparison is also unfair as (a) the constituencies are different and (b) Major had already been PM for 1.5 years in 1992.
Heath represented a break from the patrician past. Cameron's an attempt to prove that background no longer matters [obviously, to a subset of the left, it's his defining feature].
Excellent to see Sporting sponsoring a PB.com competition, good on them! They put some of those larger bookies and the largest betting exchange to shame. ..... Are you listening Paddy Power, SkyBet, Corals, Betfair and others one could mention, who never put their hands in their pockets, despite all the free advertising they receive on this site?
Excellent to see Sporting sponsoring a PB.com competition, good on them! They put some of those larger bookies and the largest betting exchange to shame. ..... Are you listening Paddy Power, SkyBet, Corals, Betfair and others one could mention, who never put their hands in their pockets, despite all the free advertising they receive on this site?
I think Betfair Sportsbook & Coral could probably do without the free advertising some of us have been giving them.
Labour lead in ELBOW so far this week up to 1.4% inc. last night's YG and TNS!
Super-ELBOW for February so far, also 1.4% lead (cf. 1.1% for all of January).
According to Lewis Baston, the reason for TNS's low Conservative score (and high UKIP score) is that they weight to the EU election results. Everyone else (apart from MORI) weights to the last general election.
Understood. Labour lead so far this week excluding TNS is 0.9% (and for February so far 1.2%).
Mr. Putney, agreed. If they do F1 spreads and I won (unlikely, unless my original entry gets axed [adds up to 650 rather than 630]) this contest I'd be able to spread bet on F1, which would be interesting.
Labour lead in ELBOW so far this week up to 1.4% inc. last night's YG and TNS!
Super-ELBOW for February so far, also 1.4% lead (cf. 1.1% for all of January).
According to Lewis Baston, the reason for TNS's low Conservative score (and high UKIP score) is that they weight to the EU election results. Everyone else (apart from MORI) weights to the last general election.
I'm really struggling with this Pensioner Bonds thing, I must be stupid.
How is the government taking out billions of pounds of loans at massively above market rate prudent financial planning and not shaking the magic money tree for free moeny but Labour, say, proposing increased spending funded by billions of pounds of loans at market rate financially irresponsible and reliant on the magic money tree?
Comments
Nice cartoon, Marf
Is it supposed to b Scotland only - there is a clear divide amongst entries on this.
I'll point it out to Her Marfness. She actually quite likes that kind of feedback - well, any feedback really, short of downright abuse - and will probably update with a corrected version later.
Unless there is an imminent Plaid Cymru/Respect surge I'm not winning.
In the meantime if you submit your correct entry now as Pulpstar Final, that should fix it
Nice to see the FIA being decisive on something that matters to almost no-one and does nothing to resolve the fundamental problems regarding the financial aspect of the sport.
As does Richard's.
Edited extra bit: terribly sorry, Mr. Eagles, but if you could have mine axed as well, that'd be splendid.
Although, I'd like to point out that's a seagull and not a pigeon
http://tinyurl.com/nfmacco
I'm going to have a think on this before submitting. My initial hunch is to go for whatever the PB average consensus is;
- 14 Con Seats
+ 16 Lab Seats
- 2 UKIP Seats
Aston Villa fan David Cameron backs Tim Sherwood appointment
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/18/david-cameron-backs-tim-sherwood-aston-villa
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/othersports/article-2957631/Mo-Farah-labels-fellow-British-runner-Andy-Vernon-embarrassment-Twitter-spat.html
Now this is what you call a good twitter spat - lol
Cameron could never get the 43% who backed JM4PM including an extraordinary personal vote in his constituency. Let's compare their personal votes 1992 vs 2010.
Major - 48662 (66%/52%)
Cameron - 33973 (59%/43%)
That's total votes followed by the % of the vote they got and the percentage of registered voters who supported them. Amidst all the fuss last week about the Tory fundraiser I thought a vital point was missed. Previous Tory PMs may have cultivated the rich or admired 'buccaneering businessmen' but they were always quite careful about their own image. The one nation tradition that sustained them up to Heath, followed by Thatcher who was always the disciplinarian school marm even if her policies made loads a'money possible and Major was the ordinary bloke from Brixton. That care seems to have been completely lost under Cameron and Osborne. Perhaps they thought if it was okay for New Labour to have an unapologetic appreciation of wealth, why not them? That carelessness could be their undoing.
Easy to see a pileup resulting and hefty casualties.
Clacton, Thanet South, Boston, Great Grimsby, Great Yarmouth, Thurrock, Castle Point, another Northern Labour seat, and it pains me to say this, Rochester & Strood.
They're running an eastenders promotion;
"Money Back if Ian Killed Lucy"
https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Albert+Square,+London+E15/@51.5483858,0.0092779,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m2!3m1!1s0x47d8a7850e1775cf:0xc66089e6621ebc1d
Super-ELBOW for February so far, also 1.4% lead (cf. 1.1% for all of January).
Fortunately I didn't fill in my name...so got to go again
If it involves boiling oil, shouldn't steps be taken soon to at least start warming it up a bit?
[Lab 259] + 30 Con + 10 LD -20 SNP = 279 seats
[Con 304] - 30 Lab + 10 LD -5 UKIP = 279 seats
seems obvious at the moment. The SNP gains from Labour have the potential to be higher.
I will be directing my 8 week sabbatical in April and May to help the Tories retain seats like Pudsey
Con 290 (SPIN 282)
Lab 275 (SPIN 278)
LibDeb 28 (SPIN 28)
UKIP 4 (SPIN 7)
Green 1
SNP 34 (SPIN 37)
The wisdom of crowds?
Heath represented a break from the patrician past. Cameron's an attempt to prove that background no longer matters [obviously, to a subset of the left, it's his defining feature].
They put some of those larger bookies and the largest betting exchange to shame. ..... Are you listening Paddy Power, SkyBet, Corals, Betfair and others one could mention, who never put their hands in their pockets, despite all the free advertising they receive on this site?
I was just correcting @Sean_F misunderstanding...
Well, I contacted La Marf and it seems yes, it was a mistake, but she likes Snotliw so much she isn't going to change it!
Accidentally on purpose, I suppose.....
Shouldn't that read "exactly what is the prescribed punishment DAVE can expect if he fails to achieve Crossover?"?
How is the government taking out billions of pounds of loans at massively above market rate prudent financial planning and not shaking the magic money tree for free moeny but Labour, say, proposing increased spending funded by billions of pounds of loans at market rate financially irresponsible and reliant on the magic money tree?