Skip to content

Your regular reminder national vote share doesn’t always matter under FPTP – politicalbetting.com

124

Comments

  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 48,428

    Nigelb said:

    Sandpit said:

    .

    Sandpit said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @JakeSherman

    Deal between House GOP moderates (Fitz, Kiggans, Valadao, Lawler) and House Republican leadership is breaking down.

    Disagreement over the language in the amendment to extend Obamacare premium subsidies.

    THE FOUR will go to rules Tues to offer amendment. If they're rejected, they will be free agents, could put JEFFRIES 3-YEAR ACA extension over the finish line

    https://x.com/JakeSherman/status/2000531747105055175?s=20

    Big Phama and Big Insurance lobbyists for the win!
    Maybe we could look to Trump's healthcare plan instead. It's coming up to 10 years since he promised one and we're still waiting, but any day now...
    This isn’t Trump’s healthcare plan, this is the expiry of the Democrat COVID-era subsidies that Democrats want to renew. All they’ve done is shovel hundreds of billions of dollars from the federal government to insurance companies and phama.
    Effectively it is about Trump's healthcare plan.
    Except he doesn't have one.

    The GOP controls both Houses and the presidency. Trump has promised to reform US healthcare for the better for the last decade.
    He has yet to provide a single detail of what that might mean.
    So any tactical manoeuvrings, when the GOP are the party unquestionably in power, are down to them.
    February 2016, that's when he first promised a plan. So, two months to go to the 10-year anniversary. Maybe he's busy working out how to get Mexico to pay for the wall first...
    Healthcare reform beyond rhetoric requires some grey matter and elbow grease. It's not a Donald Trump sort of thing.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Is it next door to a scrap yard?
    Or a canal ?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 36,397

    Eabhal said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    I simply do not accept that

    As Badenoch says minimum levels of service would be required

    Ultimately the country cannot be blackmailed by vested interests

    Imagine if the police went on strike
    Tough. You can't coerce people into working in the NHS - you have to pay them a fair wage.

    NHS productivity has grown by 5%* since 2010, and their wages cut by 20%. If it were a free labour market they'd be paid much more than they are now.

    *14% before 2020.
    Indeed, if they don't like the wage, they're welcome to resign and let someone else fill the vacancy.

    Striking is not the same as resigning.
    I'd have thought a libertarian like you would have been all for the right to strike.

    You are surely not saying we should legislate to limit such an individual liberty?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,996
    Taz said:

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Can anyone top that !!

    I don’t live in the wealthiest part of the world and there’s some rough parts round here but nothing like that here
    Do your local stores have "No pyjamas" signs on the door?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 36,397

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Our local supermarket's security tags have security tags on them.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 36,397
    edited December 15

    Taz said:

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Can anyone top that !!

    I don’t live in the wealthiest part of the world and there’s some rough parts round here but nothing like that here
    Do your local stores have "No pyjamas" signs on the door?
    That's outrageous! Expecting customers to parade around naked when shopping at night is just not on.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002

    Taz said:

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Can anyone top that !!

    I don’t live in the wealthiest part of the world and there’s some rough parts round here but nothing like that here
    Do your local stores have "No pyjamas" signs on the door?
    Only the ones I don’t shop in, although I don’t wear pyjamas. 🤔
  • Taz said:

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Can anyone top that !!

    I don’t live in the wealthiest part of the world and there’s some rough parts round here but nothing like that here
    It's weird and a bit random, they have tags on alcohol, razor blades and the baskets.

    I had no idea shopping baskets were a lucrative target for thieves :smiley:
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 21,203
    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    They have to pay back all their training costs even if they stay
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 47,046

    Taz said:

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Can anyone top that !!

    I don’t live in the wealthiest part of the world and there’s some rough parts round here but nothing like that here
    It's weird and a bit random, they have tags on alcohol, razor blades and the baskets.

    I had no idea shopping baskets were a lucrative target for thieves :smiley:
    It's what one puts in them ...
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,132

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Our local supermarket's security tags have security tags on them.
    Beat me to it.

    Since we moved from Chesterfield to Bolsover noticed a massive increase in thd security on stuff. Shopping trolleys, meat, toiletories and anything with other than a tiny price is tagged.

    Also noticed total non compliance with blue badge parking spots co.pared to Chezzy.

    Very annoying.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 27,066
    FF43 said:

    @viewcode, I believe you are writing a piece on sex/gender equality and discrimination. You might find this article interesting on the For Women Scotland case and the far reaching implications of the Supreme Court judgment.

    https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/1233/1030

    Thank you for the contribution. I will read it but I don't know if I will have space to fit it it.

    The article is on its sixth draft and is over 2,200 words not including the 16 appendices and the three of the four (@DavidL hasn't kicked in yet) discussants. The subheadings are:
    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT “FWS VS THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS”: 16APR2025
    • 3. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND TOILETS
    • 4. THE EHRC INTERIM GUIDANCE: APR-JUN 2025
    • 5. THE EQUAL TREATMENT BENCH BOOK: MAY 2025 UPDATE
    • 6. KELLY AND PEGGIE DEC 2025
    • 6B. THE WOMEN’S INSTITUTE: 03DEC2025
    • 7. SULLIVAN REPORT AT RSS CONFERENCE 02SEP2025
    • 8. GLP v EHRC NOV 2025
    • 9. THE EHRC FINAL GUIDANCE NOV 2025
    • 10. HARWOOD AND FORAN SUBSTACKS
    • 11. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND RIGHTS
    • 12. SUMMARY
    • 13. AFTERWORD
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    They have to pay back all their training costs even if they stay
    Writing off training costs owed as a condition of staying is something that has been suggested before and seems reasonable to me.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 41,274
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 56,875
    Scott_xP said:
    Everything has to be about Trump.

    I very much look forward to a world where we no longer mention his name, like Voldemort.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 14,865
    Nigelb said:

    Taz said:

    Eabhal said:

    Taz said:

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    If everyone who threatened to go to Oz actually sent there’d be hardly anyone left.

    For many it’s just talk to try to screw more money.
    One of the funniest things about PB is the idea that wage incentives only apply to people in the private sector. Endless posts about laffer curves - but when it's doctors, suddenly it's all about values and fairness.

    The bigger issue in the long run isn't Australia - it's whether smart British kids even consider medicine in the first place given the pay and conditions on offer - and that's before you get to their ungrateful and entitled patients.
    What’s even more funny about PB is people who reply to a comment someone makes having a dig about something that person hasn’t said and has never said. 😜
    You mean like this ?
    ..But since this war started PB has been full of experts proclaiming the war will be over by Xmas etc..
    I've said it'll be over by Xmas loads of fucking times so The Tazmeister isn't wrong.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 56,875

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Our local supermarket's security tags have security tags on them.
    The checkout staff never seem to bother getting the tags properly cleared. And I never get stopped when one goes off as you exit.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002
    viewcode said:

    FF43 said:

    @viewcode, I believe you are writing a piece on sex/gender equality and discrimination. You might find this article interesting on the For Women Scotland case and the far reaching implications of the Supreme Court judgment.

    https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/1233/1030

    Thank you for the contribution. I will read it but I don't know if I will have space to fit it it.

    The article is on its sixth draft and is over 2,200 words not including the 16 appendices and the three of the four (@DavidL hasn't kicked in yet) discussants. The subheadings are:
    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT “FWS VS THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS”: 16APR2025
    • 3. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND TOILETS
    • 4. THE EHRC INTERIM GUIDANCE: APR-JUN 2025
    • 5. THE EQUAL TREATMENT BENCH BOOK: MAY 2025 UPDATE
    • 6. KELLY AND PEGGIE DEC 2025
    • 6B. THE WOMEN’S INSTITUTE: 03DEC2025
    • 7. SULLIVAN REPORT AT RSS CONFERENCE 02SEP2025
    • 8. GLP v EHRC NOV 2025
    • 9. THE EHRC FINAL GUIDANCE NOV 2025
    • 10. HARWOOD AND FORAN SUBSTACKS
    • 11. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND RIGHTS
    • 12. SUMMARY
    • 13. AFTERWORD
    When the Peggie case first started I read he name as Sandy Pegging and I can no longer take it seriously. 🥺
  • viewcode said:

    FF43 said:

    @viewcode, I believe you are writing a piece on sex/gender equality and discrimination. You might find this article interesting on the For Women Scotland case and the far reaching implications of the Supreme Court judgment.

    https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/1233/1030

    Thank you for the contribution. I will read it but I don't know if I will have space to fit it it.

    The article is on its sixth draft and is over 2,200 words not including the 16 appendices and the three of the four (@DavidL hasn't kicked in yet) discussants. The subheadings are:
    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT “FWS VS THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS”: 16APR2025
    • 3. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND TOILETS
    • 4. THE EHRC INTERIM GUIDANCE: APR-JUN 2025
    • 5. THE EQUAL TREATMENT BENCH BOOK: MAY 2025 UPDATE
    • 6. KELLY AND PEGGIE DEC 2025
    • 6B. THE WOMEN’S INSTITUTE: 03DEC2025
    • 7. SULLIVAN REPORT AT RSS CONFERENCE 02SEP2025
    • 8. GLP v EHRC NOV 2025
    • 9. THE EHRC FINAL GUIDANCE NOV 2025
    • 10. HARWOOD AND FORAN SUBSTACKS
    • 11. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND RIGHTS
    • 12. SUMMARY
    • 13. AFTERWORD
    This paper brings up a new angle which is the impact of EU law. Did Brexit change the status of trans people, and did the SC miss this?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 59,243

    DavidL said:

    One of the problems with the resident doctors which previous generations of doctors did not have is student debt. They are facing a much higher rate of tax than the previous generation in the form of loan repayments and this is what is making them feel worse off.

    A possible solution to this would be to introduce a form of redemption of the debt in return for commitment to the NHS. So, if you work for the NHS for 5 years as a qualified doctor say 50% of your debt is written off. This would have the effect of giving real term wage increases (because their monthly contributions would fall) but without the inflation in base salaries (and the consequential pension entitlements). We need to be a bit more innovative in seeking a resolution here.

    I am extremely disappointed in the resident doctors' response but I can't say I am surprised. The proposition that the BMA has been taken over by a bunch of radicals who were not really representative of their membership has been proven to be a fantasy. If Streeting is going to be Starmer's replacement his mettle is about to be tested.

    I have long thought that doctors should have their fees covered in exchange for a 10 - 15 year commitment to the NHS
    Same here. And teachers.

    The one method (used by some companies paying for expensive professional qualifications) would be to

    - cover the interest and freeze repayment while employed. So immediate relief.
    - pay down the principle in accelerating schedule. That is, small in the early years, but finish off with a couple of big payments in years 6 & 7, say.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,256
    Someone mentioned chuggers down thread and I've just had one at the door.

    About the fourth in a couple of weeks.

    Is it 'cos it is the season of goodwill?

  • Someone mentioned chuggers down thread and I've just had one at the door.

    About the fourth in a couple of weeks.

    Is it 'cos it is the season of goodwill?

    Upthread shirley?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,996
    Taz said:

    viewcode said:

    FF43 said:

    @viewcode, I believe you are writing a piece on sex/gender equality and discrimination. You might find this article interesting on the For Women Scotland case and the far reaching implications of the Supreme Court judgment.

    https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/1233/1030

    Thank you for the contribution. I will read it but I don't know if I will have space to fit it it.

    The article is on its sixth draft and is over 2,200 words not including the 16 appendices and the three of the four (@DavidL hasn't kicked in yet) discussants. The subheadings are:
    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT “FWS VS THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS”: 16APR2025
    • 3. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND TOILETS
    • 4. THE EHRC INTERIM GUIDANCE: APR-JUN 2025
    • 5. THE EQUAL TREATMENT BENCH BOOK: MAY 2025 UPDATE
    • 6. KELLY AND PEGGIE DEC 2025
    • 6B. THE WOMEN’S INSTITUTE: 03DEC2025
    • 7. SULLIVAN REPORT AT RSS CONFERENCE 02SEP2025
    • 8. GLP v EHRC NOV 2025
    • 9. THE EHRC FINAL GUIDANCE NOV 2025
    • 10. HARWOOD AND FORAN SUBSTACKS
    • 11. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND RIGHTS
    • 12. SUMMARY
    • 13. AFTERWORD
    When the Peggie case first started I read he name as Sandy Pegging and I can no longer take it seriously. 🥺
    Sandy Pegging? I'd rather not!
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467
    Dura_Ace said:

    Nigelb said:

    Taz said:

    Eabhal said:

    Taz said:

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    If everyone who threatened to go to Oz actually sent there’d be hardly anyone left.

    For many it’s just talk to try to screw more money.
    One of the funniest things about PB is the idea that wage incentives only apply to people in the private sector. Endless posts about laffer curves - but when it's doctors, suddenly it's all about values and fairness.

    The bigger issue in the long run isn't Australia - it's whether smart British kids even consider medicine in the first place given the pay and conditions on offer - and that's before you get to their ungrateful and entitled patients.
    What’s even more funny about PB is people who reply to a comment someone makes having a dig about something that person hasn’t said and has never said. 😜
    You mean like this ?
    ..But since this war started PB has been full of experts proclaiming the war will be over by Xmas etc..
    I've said it'll be over by Xmas loads of fucking times so The Tazmeister isn't wrong.
    The original call was three days.
    But that wasn't a PBer, AFAIK.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,996

    Someone mentioned chuggers down thread and I've just had one at the door.

    About the fourth in a couple of weeks.

    Is it 'cos it is the season of goodwill?

    Don't your security gates keep them out?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 59,243
    Sean_F said:

    nico67 said:

    What a disgraceful decision to continue with the strike . Streeting offered to extended their mandate for a strike so they could take this action in January .

    Those that supported the strike should be under no illusion that they’ve destroyed any public goodwill towards them .

    For those that voted to accept the offer sorry that your whole professions reputation is being trashed .

    As Clare Short might have put it, "they want golden elephants."
    It’s human nature.

    They got 27% last time, from the same people. So they are trying to get another bite.
  • BurgessianBurgessian Posts: 3,352
    Scott_xP said:
    A deranged narcissist.

    And this is the guy who is deciding (or at least influencing) the fate of 40m Ukrainians.

    This must be the most lurid period in history since the madder of the Roman emperors. But no-one voted for them.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 36,397
    edited December 15

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Our local supermarket's security tags have security tags on them.
    Beat me to it.

    Since we moved from Chesterfield to Bolsover noticed a massive increase in thd security on stuff. Shopping trolleys, meat, toiletories and anything with other than a tiny price is tagged.

    Also noticed total non compliance with blue badge parking spots co.pared to Chezzy.

    Very annoying.
    If you're feeling bold, do what we saw a wheelchair user in York do.

    Get some A5 sticky notices printed with the glue on the printed side and stick one right in the middle of the driver's side of the windscreen. They should say something like "You shouldn't be parked here without a valid Blue Badge on display."

    The stickier the glue the better - ideally the driver has to spend >10 mins scraping the sticker off before driving away.

  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 56,681
    He's incapable of giving a straight answer.

    https://x.com/hkanji/status/2000230089934401621

    The Economist: Do you use AI yourself?
    Sir Keir: Yes, I do use AI.
    The Economist: What for?
    Sir Keir: We’re using it within government for a whole bunch of roles.
    The Economist: But what about you personally? Are you on ChatGPT of an evening?
    Sir Keir: No, but my children are.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 59,243
    viewcode said:

    FF43 said:

    @viewcode, I believe you are writing a piece on sex/gender equality and discrimination. You might find this article interesting on the For Women Scotland case and the far reaching implications of the Supreme Court judgment.

    https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/1233/1030

    Thank you for the contribution. I will read it but I don't know if I will have space to fit it it.

    The article is on its sixth draft and is over 2,200 words not including the 16 appendices and the three of the four (@DavidL hasn't kicked in yet) discussants. The subheadings are:
    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT “FWS VS THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS”: 16APR2025
    • 3. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND TOILETS
    • 4. THE EHRC INTERIM GUIDANCE: APR-JUN 2025
    • 5. THE EQUAL TREATMENT BENCH BOOK: MAY 2025 UPDATE
    • 6. KELLY AND PEGGIE DEC 2025
    • 6B. THE WOMEN’S INSTITUTE: 03DEC2025
    • 7. SULLIVAN REPORT AT RSS CONFERENCE 02SEP2025
    • 8. GLP v EHRC NOV 2025
    • 9. THE EHRC FINAL GUIDANCE NOV 2025
    • 10. HARWOOD AND FORAN SUBSTACKS
    • 11. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND RIGHTS
    • 12. SUMMARY
    • 13. AFTERWORD
    At this point, I have to ask if you’ve considered publication in a more formal setting?

    Given the effort and peer review…
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 59,243
    Nigelb said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Nigelb said:

    Taz said:

    Eabhal said:

    Taz said:

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    If everyone who threatened to go to Oz actually sent there’d be hardly anyone left.

    For many it’s just talk to try to screw more money.
    One of the funniest things about PB is the idea that wage incentives only apply to people in the private sector. Endless posts about laffer curves - but when it's doctors, suddenly it's all about values and fairness.

    The bigger issue in the long run isn't Australia - it's whether smart British kids even consider medicine in the first place given the pay and conditions on offer - and that's before you get to their ungrateful and entitled patients.
    What’s even more funny about PB is people who reply to a comment someone makes having a dig about something that person hasn’t said and has never said. 😜
    You mean like this ?
    ..But since this war started PB has been full of experts proclaiming the war will be over by Xmas etc..
    I've said it'll be over by Xmas loads of fucking times so The Tazmeister isn't wrong.
    The original call was three days.
    But that wasn't a PBer, AFAIK.
    Are you sure he isn’t a PBer?
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,996

    He's incapable of giving a straight answer.

    https://x.com/hkanji/status/2000230089934401621

    The Economist: Do you use AI yourself?
    Sir Keir: Yes, I do use AI.
    The Economist: What for?
    Sir Keir: We’re using it within government for a whole bunch of roles.
    The Economist: But what about you personally? Are you on ChatGPT of an evening?
    Sir Keir: No, but my children are.

    Well he's not going to admit to using AI to generate nudie pictures of Kemi, is he?
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002
    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 59,243
    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    Inconceivable
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467

    Nigelb said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    Nigelb said:

    Taz said:

    Eabhal said:

    Taz said:

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    If everyone who threatened to go to Oz actually sent there’d be hardly anyone left.

    For many it’s just talk to try to screw more money.
    One of the funniest things about PB is the idea that wage incentives only apply to people in the private sector. Endless posts about laffer curves - but when it's doctors, suddenly it's all about values and fairness.

    The bigger issue in the long run isn't Australia - it's whether smart British kids even consider medicine in the first place given the pay and conditions on offer - and that's before you get to their ungrateful and entitled patients.
    What’s even more funny about PB is people who reply to a comment someone makes having a dig about something that person hasn’t said and has never said. 😜
    You mean like this ?
    ..But since this war started PB has been full of experts proclaiming the war will be over by Xmas etc..
    I've said it'll be over by Xmas loads of fucking times so The Tazmeister isn't wrong.
    The original call was three days.
    But that wasn't a PBer, AFAIK.
    Are you sure he isn’t a PBer?
    Hence AFAIK.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 40,098
    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    It's hard to know what is and is not parody, any more.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 27,066

    viewcode said:

    FF43 said:

    @viewcode, I believe you are writing a piece on sex/gender equality and discrimination. You might find this article interesting on the For Women Scotland case and the far reaching implications of the Supreme Court judgment.

    https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/1233/1030

    Thank you for the contribution. I will read it but I don't know if I will have space to fit it it.

    The article is on its sixth draft and is over 2,200 words not including the 16 appendices and the three of the four (@DavidL hasn't kicked in yet) discussants. The subheadings are:
    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT “FWS VS THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS”: 16APR2025
    • 3. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND TOILETS
    • 4. THE EHRC INTERIM GUIDANCE: APR-JUN 2025
    • 5. THE EQUAL TREATMENT BENCH BOOK: MAY 2025 UPDATE
    • 6. KELLY AND PEGGIE DEC 2025
    • 6B. THE WOMEN’S INSTITUTE: 03DEC2025
    • 7. SULLIVAN REPORT AT RSS CONFERENCE 02SEP2025
    • 8. GLP v EHRC NOV 2025
    • 9. THE EHRC FINAL GUIDANCE NOV 2025
    • 10. HARWOOD AND FORAN SUBSTACKS
    • 11. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND RIGHTS
    • 12. SUMMARY
    • 13. AFTERWORD
    At this point, I have to ask if you’ve considered publication in a more formal setting?

    Given the effort and peer review…
    No. As mentioned previously, I have more than one job. One of them includes writing articles for various publications, albeit unpaid. I don't want to endanger that stream with this, and informal convos make me think it wouldn't be published anyway.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467

    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    Inconceivable
    I do not think that means what you think it means.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 54,406
    Taz said:

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    They have to pay back all their training costs even if they stay
    Writing off training costs owed as a condition of staying is something that has been suggested before and seems reasonable to me.
    Which would have the same effect as a 9% payrise.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002
    Sean_F said:

    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    It's hard to know what is and is not parody, any more.
    I checked multiple sources on social media before posting it as, even by Trumps standards, I found that hard to fathom.

    Especially after Rob Reiners dignified comments in the aftermath of the Kirk shooting, given they were politically miles apart.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467
    Biden really has become MAGA's Emmanuel Goldstein, hasn't he ?

    Vance: "Every affordability crisis that's confronting the American people today, is traceable directly to a problem caused by Joe Biden”
    https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/2000010748928364888
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 41,274
    Taz said:

    Sean_F said:

    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    It's hard to know what is and is not parody, any more.
    I checked multiple sources on social media before posting it as, even by Trumps standards, I found that hard to fathom.

    Especially after Rob Reiners dignified comments in the aftermath of the Kirk shooting, given they were politically miles apart.
    He is suffering rapid and serious mental decline
  • Lots of talk locally that Prince George will be attending his Mater’s Alma Mater, ie Marlborough College. We might see some increased security; he might be in the boarding house that I deliver to

    I already deliver to good friends of theirs. He was at prep school and Eton with William, and he used to stay at her place In Edinburgh when visiting from St Andrews

    They (the royal friends, not the royals) sent me a lovely card and a delicious box of chocolates after I got hit by the car. I ate all of the chocolates in one sitting; they were so good, it was worth feeling sick for an hour afterwards
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002

    Lots of talk locally that Prince George will be attending his Mater’s Alma Mater, ie Marlborough College. We might see some increased security; he might be in the boarding house that I deliver to

    I already deliver to good friends of theirs. He was at prep school and Eton with William, and he used to stay at her place In Edinburgh when visiting from St Andrews

    They (the royal friends, not the royals) sent me a lovely card and a delicious box of chocolates after I got hit by the car. I ate all of the chocolates in one sitting; they were so good, it was worth feeling sick for an hour afterwards

    You’ll have to get him up to Devil’s End !
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,470
    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002
    Scott_xP said:

    Taz said:

    Sean_F said:

    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    It's hard to know what is and is not parody, any more.
    I checked multiple sources on social media before posting it as, even by Trumps standards, I found that hard to fathom.

    Especially after Rob Reiners dignified comments in the aftermath of the Kirk shooting, given they were politically miles apart.
    He is suffering rapid and serious mental decline
    Obama, OTOH, was class personified.

    https://x.com/barackobama/status/2000442913885712602?s=61
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,132

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    They have to pay back all their training costs even if they stay
    Dont let facts get in the way of Malcs rants!
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 23,132
    Taz said:

    Lots of talk locally that Prince George will be attending his Mater’s Alma Mater, ie Marlborough College. We might see some increased security; he might be in the boarding house that I deliver to

    I already deliver to good friends of theirs. He was at prep school and Eton with William, and he used to stay at her place In Edinburgh when visiting from St Andrews

    They (the royal friends, not the royals) sent me a lovely card and a delicious box of chocolates after I got hit by the car. I ate all of the chocolates in one sitting; they were so good, it was worth feeling sick for an hour afterwards

    You’ll have to get him up to Devil’s End !
    Is that a posh version of the Devils Arse in Castleton.

    Seen Richard Hawley playing a set in there.

    Great acousics
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467
    Taz said:

    Scott_xP said:

    Taz said:

    Sean_F said:

    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    It's hard to know what is and is not parody, any more.
    I checked multiple sources on social media before posting it as, even by Trumps standards, I found that hard to fathom.

    Especially after Rob Reiners dignified comments in the aftermath of the Kirk shooting, given they were politically miles apart.
    He is suffering rapid and serious mental decline
    Obama, OTOH, was class personified.

    https://x.com/barackobama/status/2000442913885712602?s=61
    Even extreme MAGA aren't incapable of showing class at such times.
    James Woods, who was nominated for an Oscar for starring in Reiner's 1996 drama Ghosts of Mississippi, said he was "devastated by this terrible event".
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002
    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,256
    Scott_xP said:

    Taz said:

    Sean_F said:

    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    It's hard to know what is and is not parody, any more.
    I checked multiple sources on social media before posting it as, even by Trumps standards, I found that hard to fathom.

    Especially after Rob Reiners dignified comments in the aftermath of the Kirk shooting, given they were politically miles apart.
    He is suffering rapid and serious mental decline
    But he's aced all the tests like experts have never seen before!
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 47,046
    viewcode said:

    FF43 said:

    @viewcode, I believe you are writing a piece on sex/gender equality and discrimination. You might find this article interesting on the For Women Scotland case and the far reaching implications of the Supreme Court judgment.

    https://nilq.qub.ac.uk/index.php/nilq/article/view/1233/1030

    Thank you for the contribution. I will read it but I don't know if I will have space to fit it it.

    The article is on its sixth draft and is over 2,200 words not including the 16 appendices and the three of the four (@DavidL hasn't kicked in yet) discussants. The subheadings are:
    • 1. INTRODUCTION
    • 2. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT “FWS VS THE SCOTTISH MINISTERS”: 16APR2025
    • 3. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND TOILETS
    • 4. THE EHRC INTERIM GUIDANCE: APR-JUN 2025
    • 5. THE EQUAL TREATMENT BENCH BOOK: MAY 2025 UPDATE
    • 6. KELLY AND PEGGIE DEC 2025
    • 6B. THE WOMEN’S INSTITUTE: 03DEC2025
    • 7. SULLIVAN REPORT AT RSS CONFERENCE 02SEP2025
    • 8. GLP v EHRC NOV 2025
    • 9. THE EHRC FINAL GUIDANCE NOV 2025
    • 10. HARWOOD AND FORAN SUBSTACKS
    • 11. THE SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT AND RIGHTS
    • 12. SUMMARY
    • 13. AFTERWORD
    You might want to look at this - but IANAE and leave it entirely to you to decide if it is any interest.

    https://www.thenational.scot/news/25693712.sandie-peggie-judgment-doesnt-necessarily-contradict-supreme-court/
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 47,046
    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Oh, what kind?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,256

    Someone mentioned chuggers down thread and I've just had one at the door.

    About the fourth in a couple of weeks.

    Is it 'cos it is the season of goodwill?

    Don't your security gates keep them out?
    I've asked Santa for a set.

  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,256

    ‪dag‬
    @davidallengreen.bsky.social‬

    In a fitting tribute, Trump turns his inanity up to eleven.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 17,561
    Taz said:

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    If everyone who threatened to go to Oz actually sent there’d be hardly anyone left.

    For many it’s just talk to try to screw more money.
    Maybe all the doctors can hang out with the high net worth individuals who have supposedly fled high taxes.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 56,681
    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2000594550599864781

    NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces

    "Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"
  • stodgestodge Posts: 15,698
    Afternoon all :)

    In rural Derbyshire this week where today at least has been pretty bleak with rain on and off.

    East Midlands Railway (EMR) got us here and to be honest not bad at all. A very busy five coach train which was taken out of service at Derby and everyone heading on to Chesterfield and Sheffield had to switch to another train on an adjacent platform at Derby but all well organised.

    We’ve discovered we can now travel direct to Lincoln and Cleethorpes from our local stop - Mrs Stodge did wonder about the attraction of a December afternoon in the latter to which I could provide no real answer.

    EMR is run by Transport UK who took over the Abellio franchises in the UK a couple of years ago.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 69,256

    ‪Sam Freedman‬
    @samfr.bsky.social‬

    Starting to think that the President going completely mad might force his party to act next year.

    https://bsky.app/profile/samfr.bsky.social/post/3m7zy644azu2q
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 2,127
    Today's pic courtesy of the Passport Office. Avoids pages getting stuck together with all sorts of interesting stuff.




  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2000594550599864781

    NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces

    "Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"

    You'd think they'd have worked that one out before getting into government, if they were serious.
    It's not as though it's some big secret.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002
    Carnyx said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Oh, what kind?
    Above a certain value. Certainly for Lloyds.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 17,561

    malcolmg said:

    Eabhal said:

    Doctors reject government offer and strikes will go ahead

    Time to bring in Badenoch promise to outlaw strikes by doctors, same as police

    The NHS already has massive monopsonistic power in the UK - it's why drugs are so cheap and why NHS wages have been cut by 20% in real terms in the last 20 years. 11% of GDP v 18% in the US.

    Banning strikes will turn the stream of doctors to Australia into a flood, and it's your demographic that will suffer the worst.
    Comparing with US is utter bollox and if they want to go to Australia they should make sure they pay back all their traing costs and F*** off
    They have to pay back all their training costs even if they stay
    Not quite. They have to pay fees and pay back loans for those fees, but their fees don't cover the full cost of their training, which the government subsidises.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 47,046
    Taz said:

    Carnyx said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Oh, what kind?
    Above a certain value. Certainly for Lloyds.
    Thanks, off to check what my bank says now.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002


    ‪Sam Freedman‬
    @samfr.bsky.social‬

    Starting to think that the President going completely mad might force his party to act next year.

    https://bsky.app/profile/samfr.bsky.social/post/3m7zy644azu2q

    I’m starting to think ScottXP may be right and the Trumpdozer is suffering from cognitive decline.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2000594550599864781

    NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces

    "Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"

    If only there was something he was in a position to do about it.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,996

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2000594550599864781

    NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces

    "Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"

    Probably a bunch of lawyers causing the problems.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 17,561
    Scott_xP said:
    That's out there, even for Trump!
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,470
    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002

    Scott_xP said:
    That's out there, even for Trump!
    Isn’t it

    I genuinely thought it was a parody at first.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 31,234

    Carnyx said:

    DougSeal said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Perhaps if Reform does achieve a majority and then falls apart, the resulting sort-of coalition government will change the voting system and then call a fresh election.

    Altering the voting system without a mandate is a rather alarming precedent to set.
    It’s already been set.
    Holyrood - voting system set up by Lab and LDs, in a very, erm, *specific* way that I don't recall (admittedly it was a long time ago) being put in any manifesto.

    Edit: No specific mandate, except in suchlike as voting at Holyrood was seen as legitimising it, as it was agreed at and implemented by Westminster.
    A system of gerrymandering set up to keep Labour in power permanently, with the help of the Lib Dems, which was successful until Labour were so useless that they were deservedly kicked out.
    If Holyrood had been set up with FPTP would Scotland now be independent?
    (of course on the dubious premise of Westminster paying any attention to repeated SNP majorities)
    HYUFD would have driven his tank to Holyrood to prevent independence even if 100% of Scottish voters had voted SNP.
    HYUFD is English.

    His tank started to be built in 1998, and is not finished yet.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002
    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
    I once did that and three days later it hadn’t been cashed. I popped in on my way home from work to ask about it and it was still in the letterbox. The teller said they only check the post sporadically !!
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 38,832
    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Unacceptable imo.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 36,215
    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
    Don’t they charge for accepting cheques now?
    Our U3a has had to go transfers only because of the costs of banking. It’s upset some of the anti-internet members.


    And Good Evening all!
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 21,301
    Scott_xP said:

    @ChristopherJM
    News: Ukrainian SBU special operation has hit a $400mn Russian submarine in Novorossiysk.

    The Security Service of Ukraine conducted what it called a “unique special operation” targeting the port of Novorossiysk. “For the first time in history, underwater ‘Sub Sea Baby’ drones blew up a Russian submarine of the class 636.3 ‘Varshavyanka’ (according to NATO classification - Kilo). As a result of the explosion, the submarine suffered critical damage and was actually put out of action.”

    The SBU claimed: “On board the submarine were four launchers of Kaliber cruise missiles, which the enemy uses to strike the territory of Ukraine.”

    This was a joint operation of the 13th Main Directorate of Military Counterintelligence of the SBU and the Naval Forces of Ukraine.

    https://x.com/ChristopherJM/status/2000583971432718829?s=20

    #Explodey

    The Black Sea Fleet's days are numbered. Remember when we were worried the Russians might launch an amphibious assault on Odesa?

    Another Russian oil rig in the Capital Sea has been damaged too.

    The Ukrainians are amazing. I hope we don't sell them down the river.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,470
    Battlebus said:

    Today's pic courtesy of the Passport Office. Avoids pages getting stuck together with all sorts of interesting stuff.




    Lovely, but surprised they allowed that photo - smiling is not normally permitted, is it?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467
    .

    Scott_xP said:
    That's out there, even for Trump!
    That's half the problem.

    We're already making allowances for his brand of odium.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,470
    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
    I once did that and three days later it hadn’t been cashed. I popped in on my way home from work to ask about it and it was still in the letterbox. The teller said they only check the post sporadically !!
    So that means send it by signed-for delivery. Wow. Clearly they don't intend cheque use to continue, whatever authorities may say.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467
    Cookie said:

    Not that it's of any consequence, but a personal milestone today: since roughly 2012, I've been going to my kids' Christmas nativities. Reckon I've done 30-odd. Last one today - my youngest daughter leaves primary school next summer. It wasn't the most memorable of nativities, but it was pleasingly typical - the familiar words, a mixture of songs traditional and primary-school-inane, the always-incongruous desert scene in the background, the rag, tag and bobtail of kids taking part (I particularly enjoyed the king in the too-large crown which had to balance on his ears, making them stick out; and the fact that the Angel Gabriel was wearing deely boppers bearing the legend 'Ho Ho Ho'. A slight lump in the throat as I reflected on that period of my life passing on; happiness that the rituals still go on albeit with different people doing them.
    I'm generally not keen on religion but this is a bit of religion I'll happily allow into Christmas.

    Wait 'til they leave home.
    It's all over way too quickly.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 14,865
    Sean_F said:


    C:\Users\Sean\OneDrive\Documents\The Strong Cannot Always Do As They Will.docx

    The 86 year old chair of the parish council does this when he's trying to send me agenda and other bullshit I'll never read.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 84,467
    edited December 15
    Nigelb said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2000594550599864781

    NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces

    "Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"

    You'd think they'd have worked that one out before getting into government, if they were serious.
    It's not as though it's some big secret.
    And don't get your hopes up (though TBF this doesn't seem to be official yet).

    The Government is considering requiring that everyone hire an architect in order to submit a planning application or a building control application.

    This would be a mistake. If the state wants buildings to meet certain standards, it should simply require that they do so. We have a system for this – two systems, in fact, namely building regulations and planning.

    There is no good reason to require hiring people with architecture degrees to sign off designs. This is a classic case of valuing process over outcomes. Developers could and would simply employ tame architects to rubber-stamp whatever they were doing anyway. 'Protection of function' is a completely toothless instrument for improving design standards.

    What it would do, of course, is add cost -- exactly what British housebuilding does not need at the moment.

    The Government should discard this idea immediately.

    Reporting in @ArchitectsJrnal..

    https://x.com/SCP_Hughes/status/2000548649479123429
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 36,397
    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/2000594550599864781

    NEW: Keir Starmer says he is "frustrated" with the number of regulations he faces

    "Every time I go to pull a lever, there are a whole bunch of regulations, consultations, arms-length bodies that mean the action from pulling the lever to delivery is longer than I think it ought to be"

    You'd think they'd have worked that one out before getting into government, if they were serious.
    It's not as though it's some big secret.
    And don't get your hopes up (though TBF this doesn't seem to be official yet).

    The Government is considering requiring that everyone hire an architect in order to submit a planning application or a building control application.

    This would be a mistake. If the state wants buildings to meet certain standards, it should simply require that they do so. We have a system for this – two systems, in fact, namely building regulations and planning.

    There is no good reason to require hiring people with architecture degrees to sign off designs. This is a classic case of valuing process over outcomes. Developers could and would simply employ tame architects to rubber-stamp whatever they were doing anyway. 'Protection of function' is a completely toothless instrument for improving design standards.

    What it would do, of course, is add cost -- exactly what British housebuilding does not need at the moment.

    The Government should discard this idea immediately.

    Reporting in @ArchitectsJrnal..

    https://x.com/SCP_Hughes/status/2000548649479123429
    Sounds like an idea proposed by... architects.
  • TazTaz Posts: 23,002
    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
    I once did that and three days later it hadn’t been cashed. I popped in on my way home from work to ask about it and it was still in the letterbox. The teller said they only check the post sporadically !!
    So that means send it by signed-for delivery. Wow. Clearly they don't intend cheque use to continue, whatever authorities may say.
    I just dropped it in the bank letterbox when I was cycling in to work.

    I think you’re right. The day of the cheque is coming to an end.
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 14,865
    Taz said:

    Apparently this is real !!!!

    Gobsmacked.


    That is quite funny. The only death I've ever seen him genuinely sad about was the Notorious RBG. Even the overwrought emoting over that piece of shit Charlie Kirk was obviously feigned.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 36,215
    edited December 15
    The stage after that is when they bring their ‘plus one’s’ home.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 54,406
    Cookie said:

    Not that it's of any consequence, but a personal milestone today: since roughly 2012, I've been going to my kids' Christmas nativities. Reckon I've done 30-odd. Last one today - my youngest daughter leaves primary school next summer. It wasn't the most memorable of nativities, but it was pleasingly typical - the familiar words, a mixture of songs traditional and primary-school-inane, the always-incongruous desert scene in the background, the rag, tag and bobtail of kids taking part (I particularly enjoyed the king in the too-large crown which had to balance on his ears, making them stick out; and the fact that the Angel Gabriel was wearing deely boppers bearing the legend 'Ho Ho Ho'. A slight lump in the throat as I reflected on that period of my life passing on; happiness that the rituals still go on albeit with different people doing them.
    I'm generally not keen on religion but this is a bit of religion I'll happily allow into Christmas.

    There's likely to be grandkids at some point, so you can enjoiy it all again.
  • AnneJGPAnneJGP Posts: 4,470

    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
    Don’t they charge for accepting cheques now?
    Our U3a has had to go transfers only because of the costs of banking. It’s upset some of the anti-internet members.


    And Good Evening all!
    I haven't come across a charge for accepting cheques, except in small businesses when someone wants to pay by cheque. But the cost of a stamp or the cost of signed-for delivery will effectively be a charge for receiving a cheque.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 7,145
    stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    In rural Derbyshire this week where today at least has been pretty bleak with rain on and off.

    East Midlands Railway (EMR) got us here and to be honest not bad at all. A very busy five coach train which was taken out of service at Derby and everyone heading on to Chesterfield and Sheffield had to switch to another train on an adjacent platform at Derby but all well organised.

    We’ve discovered we can now travel direct to Lincoln and Cleethorpes from our local stop - Mrs Stodge did wonder about the attraction of a December afternoon in the latter to which I could provide no real answer.

    EMR is run by Transport UK who took over the Abellio franchises in the UK a couple of years ago.

    More importantly, is there a train back from Cleethorpes?
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 48,428
    That Reiner post from the President of the United States. I mean c'mon. This surely isn't tolerable for much longer. It's beyond bad, it's just wrong. There has to be a way. If it gives us Vance so be it.
  • Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
    I once did that and three days later it hadn’t been cashed. I popped in on my way home from work to ask about it and it was still in the letterbox. The teller said they only check the post sporadically !!
    So that means send it by signed-for delivery. Wow. Clearly they don't intend cheque use to continue, whatever authorities may say.
    I just dropped it in the bank letterbox when I was cycling in to work.

    I think you’re right. The day of the cheque is coming to an end.
    If you are a legacy bank like Lloyds, Barclays etc. you are competing these days with the e-banks like Monzo who will absolutely not be giving you a cheque book or a branch service.

    I imagine at some point legacy banks will offer paid for services, like use of branches, cheque books etc. whilst they have free accounts for customers who are happy to do everything online to complete with the e-banks offerings.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 36,397
    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
    I thought Post Offices will bank cheques for you. (As a bonus, you could end up with a double credit if they use Horizon.)

    Edit: According to Gemini: "Yes, you can bank cheques at thousands of Post Office branches across the UK, provided your bank offers this service. Most major UK banks participate in this service, but you should confirm with your specific bank. Note that some banks like Halifax and Lloyds are ending this service from December 31, 2025"

    Ooops
  • AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Taz said:

    AnneJGP said:

    Grumble: Just discovered that from 31 December I can't pay in cheques (for Lloyds) at the banking hub. Apparently it's not worth their while serving customers who don't have smartphones.

    Some cheques you cannot pay in on a phone either.
    Can one post cheques to one's bank or does one need to travel to walk in through the door (assuming one can walk, of course)?
    I once did that and three days later it hadn’t been cashed. I popped in on my way home from work to ask about it and it was still in the letterbox. The teller said they only check the post sporadically !!
    So that means send it by signed-for delivery. Wow. Clearly they don't intend cheque use to continue, whatever authorities may say.
    To be fair cheque use is dwindling whatever the banks do. In 2023 the UK stood at 2 cheques per inhabitant (US was 28 and France at 13.4). This is despite all the investment in cheque imaging. If the Government move away from cheques (they are still the biggest issuer I believe - classically DVLA, but also HMRC I think) then the system will be moribund.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 36,215

    stodge said:

    Afternoon all :)

    In rural Derbyshire this week where today at least has been pretty bleak with rain on and off.

    East Midlands Railway (EMR) got us here and to be honest not bad at all. A very busy five coach train which was taken out of service at Derby and everyone heading on to Chesterfield and Sheffield had to switch to another train on an adjacent platform at Derby but all well organised.

    We’ve discovered we can now travel direct to Lincoln and Cleethorpes from our local stop - Mrs Stodge did wonder about the attraction of a December afternoon in the latter to which I could provide no real answer.

    EMR is run by Transport UK who took over the Abellio franchises in the UK a couple of years ago.

    More importantly, is there a train back from Cleethorpes?
    Surely it would be unnecessarily cruel for there NOT to be one?
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 7,145

    eek said:

    I bought a £10 bottle of cocktail mix and had a security tag on it...

    In one of my local Tescos the shopping baskets have security tags on them...
    Our local supermarket's security tags have security tags on them.
    Beat me to it.

    Since we moved from Chesterfield to Bolsover noticed a massive increase in thd security on stuff. Shopping trolleys, meat, toiletories and anything with other than a tiny price is tagged.

    Also noticed total non compliance with blue badge parking spots co.pared to Chezzy.

    Very annoying.
    If you're feeling bold, do what we saw a wheelchair user in York do.

    Get some A5 sticky notices printed with the glue on the printed side and stick one right in the middle of the driver's side of the windscreen. They should say something like "You shouldn't be parked here without a valid Blue Badge on display."

    The stickier the glue the better - ideally the driver has to spend >10 mins scraping the sticker off before driving away.

    One of the (many) things currently annoying me is blue badge spaces being reduced or moved further away in order to make more convenient spaces for EV parking.
Sign In or Register to comment.