Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

So far the voters do not see Badenoch as a Prime Minister in waiting – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,236
edited December 2024 in General
So far the voters do not see Badenoch as a Prime Minister in waiting – politicalbetting.com

New from @IpsosUK who would make the better PM?Keir Starmer 32%Kemi Badenoch 18%More https://t.co/ZKOsZsGfFq pic.twitter.com/H74hZd7ORx

Read the full story here

«1345678

Comments

  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,329
    edited December 2024
    1?

    Yay. End the year on a high.
  • We've not had Rishi's resignation honours yet.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,329
    Badenoch comes across as a lightweight. A right of centre Jo Swinson.

    While she may grow into the role, will the Tories have the patience to give her the chance to do so?

  • Kemi Badenoch will be in trouble after the May locals if Reform pip her and outperform expectations, and probably in terminal trouble after the May 2026 round.

    At the moment, that's what I expect to happen.
  • Badenoch comes across as a lightweight. A right of centre Jo Swinson.

    While she may grow into the role, will the Tories have the patience to give her the chance to do so?

    I'm afraid I've already concluded I've backed a dud. If she was to show any flash or sparkle we'd be getting early signs of it by now.

    There have been none.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,582
    Missing word or two in the header:
    "...but she really needs to needless spats.."
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,582
    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,523
    On the header, I'm available for proof-reading at very reasonable rates.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,329

    Badenoch comes across as a lightweight. A right of centre Jo Swinson.

    While she may grow into the role, will the Tories have the patience to give her the chance to do so?

    I'm afraid I've already concluded I've backed a dud. If she was to show any flash or sparkle we'd be getting early signs of it by now.

    There have been none.
    To be fair, the MPs didn't exactly hand over a wonderful pair of candidates for the members to choose between.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,570

    A right of centre Jo Swinson.

    Ouch.
  • Nigelb said:

    Missing word or two in the header:
    "...but she really needs to needless spats.."

    I overslept, can you tell?
  • Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    It should have been Hunt.
  • Badenoch comes across as a lightweight. A right of centre Jo Swinson.

    While she may grow into the role, will the Tories have the patience to give her the chance to do so?

    I'm afraid I've already concluded I've backed a dud. If she was to show any flash or sparkle we'd be getting early signs of it by now.

    There have been none.
    To be fair, the MPs didn't exactly hand over a wonderful pair of candidates for the members to choose between.
    I couldn't back Jenrick due to his ethics and morals, and the stink around them.

    But I've no doubt he'd have been twice as effective day to day. He be on the airwaves all the time, contesting every issue and looking to set the agenda.

    When did you last hear from Kemi on anything, except the odd petulant tweet?
  • Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
  • Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    It should have been Hunt.
    I agree but he chose not to stand, alas.
  • Kemi may yet have the last laugh over Reform and their data.

    Forget the accuracy of the numbers as Reform have been perhaps a little "too eager" to evidence and prove that is pretty accurate.

    The BIGGER and potentially MASSIVE problem for Reform and a saver for Kemi is that it would appear that anyone from anywhere in the World can register as a Member and more impactful, that anyone of any age can created an email address and join with no validation of where they are from, who they are, how old they are or even IF they exist.

    Now a £10 a pop ....with Billioniares / Multi Millionaires FUNDING them, it's a very very convenient back door and efficient way of data farming to created "alleged" mass Membership.

    It needs investigating for sure!

    Potential GOLD-DUST for Kemi and Labour!
  • Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    It should have been Hunt.
    I agree but he chose not to stand, alas.
    He knew that as a Remainer he would have struggled with the members, again.

    Yes I know Truss was also a Remainer, but she drank the Brexit kool-aid.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,623
    Nigelb said:

    On similar lines, should the LibDems be aiming to move on from Sir Ed this Parliament ?

    Decentish chap, but he's served his purpose, and probably achieved as much as he's ever going to do. And will be 64 by the next election.

    Make the most of having a reasonably sized pool of replacements while it still exists.

    Certainly a swimming pool ...
  • Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    It should have been Hunt.
    Hunt would have been very good, and a nice strategic space has opened up for him that he'd be well suited to.

    Yes, he'd probably be a 240 seats max candidate, but he could double the Tories seats in one election, easily deny Labour its majority, and ensure Conservative survival.

    He'd probably have to lead a Tory-Reform coalition to take office but, actually, I think he'd be quite good at doing that.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,582
    .

    The problem is more than just Badenoch.

    The problem is the Tories have just had 14 years in Downing Street so it almost doesn't matter what Badenoch says/does right now, even if she says exactly the right thing the public wants to hear it is met with a thought of "well why didn't you do that in office then?"

    Four years is a long-time to the next election though, so Badenoch needs to be seriously reflecting on what could be done better/differently and why the Tories should be back in Downing Street and what they would do. Not worrying about Twitter spats or soundbites.

    Some reflection that perhaps Starmer should have done more of to be better prepared than he is today.

    A ritual sacrifice, and the media attention around her replacement are probably the Tories' best chance of swerving oblivion now.

    Reform are (and this does not make me particularly happy) an existential threat to them.

    The alternative is a merger largely on Farage's terms.
  • Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    Cleverly is a lovely guy but an empty vase. What did he say or do?

    Same problem applies. And the MPs saw it.

    Only serious candidate is Jenrick but with ethics (which sadly he doesn't have).
  • Kemi may yet have the last laugh over Reform and their data.

    Forget the accuracy of the numbers as Reform have been perhaps a little "too eager" to evidence and prove that is pretty accurate.

    The BIGGER and potentially MASSIVE problem for Reform and a saver for Kemi is that it would appear that anyone from anywhere in the World can register as a Member and more impactful, that anyone of any age can created an email address and join with no validation of where they are from, who they are, how old they are or even IF they exist.

    Now a £10 a pop ....with Billioniares / Multi Millionaires FUNDING them, it's a very very convenient back door and efficient way of data farming to created "alleged" mass Membership.

    It needs investigating for sure!

    Potential GOLD-DUST for Kemi and Labour!

    Its a load of crap and nobody should or will give a shit.

    Corbyn had lots of members. He was also a polarising, dreadful leader who caused more voters to vote for the Tories than voted for Labour.

    It doesn't matter what Reforms membership number is, its utterly irrelevant. There are serious concerns and issues that affect the voters and that is what the Leader of the Opposition should be thinking about, not third parties membership figures.
  • Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    It should have been Hunt.
    I agree but he chose not to stand, alas.
    He knew that as a Remainer he would have struggled with the members, again.

    Yes I know Truss was also a Remainer, but she drank the Brexit kool-aid.
    Just as Remainers need to get over it so do Leavers.

    We've got to get beyond this shit. Jeremy Hunt is very far from a Remoaner, and can be (and was) hardline on lots of EU issues.

    The guy even wobbled on the original issue.
  • SandpitSandpit Posts: 55,256

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    To be fair that strategy worked fine for Starmer, and he never even got as far as the policy reviews!
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,582

    Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    It should have been Hunt.
    Hunt would have been very good, and a nice strategic space has opened up for him that he'd be well suited to.

    Yes, he'd probably be a 240 seats max candidate, but he could double the Tories seats in one election, easily deny Labour its majority, and ensure Conservative survival.

    He'd probably have to lead a Tory-Reform coalition to take office but, actually, I think he'd be quite good at doing that.
    Is it too late for him now ?

    Also of an age with Davey and Farage (all within a year of each other).
  • Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.

    LotO mostly needs a certain kind of temperament- you have to fight, you have to pick fights, but you also need the inner steely calm to accept that you will regularly lose and keep on going anyway.

    Whatever his failings, Starmer had that. Cameron had it. Blair didn't need it. Badenoch doesn't, but I'm unconvinced that Jenrick does either. Cleverly might- he seems to have the necessary sense of the absurd.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,570

    Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    It should have been Hunt.
    I agree but he chose not to stand, alas.
    He knew that as a Remainer he would have struggled with the members, again.

    Yes I know Truss was also a Remainer, but she drank the Brexit kool-aid.
    He should have made more of his comparison between the EU and the USSR.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,329
    They should have gone with Patel.

    If they do ditch Badenoch, then perhaps there will be another chance for #Priti4Leader ?
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,119

    Badenoch comes across as a lightweight. A right of centre Jo Swinson.

    While she may grow into the role, will the Tories have the patience to give her the chance to do so?

    I'm afraid I've already concluded I've backed a dud. If she was to show any flash or sparkle we'd be getting early signs of it by now.

    There have been none.
    To be fair, the MPs didn't exactly hand over a wonderful pair of candidates for the members to choose between.
    I couldn't back Jenrick due to his ethics and morals, and the stink around them.

    But I've no doubt he'd have been twice as effective day to day. He be on the airwaves all the time, contesting every issue and looking to set the agenda.

    When did you last hear from Kemi on anything, except the odd petulant tweet?
    Which is more important, the day-to-day or the next election?
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,523

    They should have gone with Patel.

    If they do ditch Badenoch, then perhaps there will be another chance for #Priti4Leader ?

    They'd have to be Priti desperate.
  • F1: 7/10 teams have new lineups, or 8/10 if you count Alpine (technically not new but Doohan only did one race for them last year).

    Remarkably high rate of change. Two teams have entirely new lineups (Haas and Sauber).
  • Sandpit said:

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    To be fair that strategy worked fine for Starmer, and he never even got as far as the policy reviews!
    Starmer won by default as the Tories imploded and it was 14 years since Labour were in office and the personnel had virtually all changed since then.

    That's not an option for Kemi.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,995

    Kemi Badenoch will be in trouble after the May locals if Reform pip her and outperform expectations, and probably in terminal trouble after the May 2026 round.

    At the moment, that's what I expect to happen.

    I thought the May locals had been cancelled, prior to the latest inept attempt to reorganise local government?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,582
    Warrant issued to detain President Yoon Seok Yeol
    https://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=389485
    (For questioning.)

    Majority of Koreans back changes to limit presidential powers
    https://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=389472
    ..According to the poll conducted by Hankook Research at the request of The Korea Times, 56 percent of 1,000 respondents expressed support for amending the Constitution to reform the current single, five-year presidential term. Meanwhile, 39 percent of those surveyed opposed the idea, and the remaining 5 percent did not provide a response. The survey was carried out over two days, from Thursday to Friday.

    The poll was conducted approximately three weeks after President Yoon Suk Yeol briefly imposed martial law, an action he defended as part of his executive authority to govern.

    However, the poll indicates that most citizens disapprove of the current system, which grants such excessive power to the president, and instead support measures to limit executive authority.

    These opinions were consistent across various groups, including gender, region, and political ideology. For example, 61 percent of respondents identifying as politically liberal supported the change. Similarly, 57 percent of those with centrist views and 51 percent of conservatives also agreed that such an amendment is necessary...



  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,981
    edited December 2024
    SFAICS there is no point in thinking about winners and losers in the GE 2028/9. What can be thought about is the factors in play about doing well/better and doing badly/worse. There is a current astonishing situation in which no party is getting even 30% in the polls, with the very occasional exception. No-one is popular, no-one is guaranteed a place at the table, and no-one is totally out of things. Unusual.

    Tories. Can only do well if Labour fail and also Tories can present as absolutely united, principled, clear and outstanding and new WRT themselves, not as critics of Labour. We will remain utterly uninterested in their critiques of Labour. They had too long to do better.

    chance: 10%

    Labour. Can only do well if they communicate well, don't make unforced errors, have some luck, are seen to succeed reasonably well, don't fiscally crash and sort the politics of housing and migartion.

    Chance: 15%

    Reform: Do well if either of the above don't happen. Do very well if both don't happen.

    Looks like about 70% chance.

    I don't believe my own conclusion. But it still may be right. DYOR.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,321

    The problem is more than just Badenoch.

    The problem is the Tories have just had 14 years in Downing Street so it almost doesn't matter what Badenoch says/does right now, even if she says exactly the right thing the public wants to hear it is met with a thought of "well why didn't you do that in office then?"

    Four years is a long-time to the next election though, so Badenoch needs to be seriously reflecting on what could be done better/differently and why the Tories should be back in Downing Street and what they would do. Not worrying about Twitter spats or soundbites.

    Some reflection that perhaps Starmer should have done more of to be better prepared than he is today.

    She also needs to move away from oppositionism to a coherent platform.

    Yet she is pledged to reverse VAT on schools, restore the agricultural tax dodge and WFP, keep the Triple Lock, increase defence spending etc.

    If she is serious about small government and tax cuts she needs to be setting out broad themes at least. She needs to let pensioners know that the featherbedding is over.
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,119
    Great line from Laurie Whitwell in The Athletic:

    [Manchester] United are performing like an inverse trapeze artist - "Roll up, roll up, be dazzled at how low we can go!"
  • Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 13,839
    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,315

    They should have gone with Patel.

    If they do ditch Badenoch, then perhaps there will be another chance for #Priti4Leader ?

    Patel isn't my cup of tea at all, but she is a serious politician who would have been unsentimental about where the Conservatives have gone wrong in recent years and would have come up with a coherent right wing alternative to Starmer's statism.

    Or go for Cleverly who would have held the fort, waited things out while being plausibly prime ministerial.

    The only thing to be said for Badenoch is she's better than Jenrick, but maybe she's already served that purpose.
  • The Kembot!

    :lol:
  • Driver said:

    Great line from Laurie Whitwell in The Athletic:

    [Manchester] United are performing like an inverse trapeze artist - "Roll up, roll up, be dazzled at how low we can go!"

    SINK RATE! PULL UP!
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 33,023
    Angus Reid, gold standard

    Con 45%
    NDP 21%
    Lib 16%
    BQ 11%
    Grn 3%
    PPC 1%
    Oth 2%

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2025_Canadian_federal_election#National_polls
  • Sandpit said:

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    To be fair that strategy worked fine for Starmer, and he never even got as far as the policy reviews!
    Yes, and look at him now!

    Kemi is in an entirely different strategic situation.

    Look, I feel for her. She's an intelligent and nice lady, and I like her, but she's got to sharpen up or she won't be able to succeed.
  • Driver said:

    Badenoch comes across as a lightweight. A right of centre Jo Swinson.

    While she may grow into the role, will the Tories have the patience to give her the chance to do so?

    I'm afraid I've already concluded I've backed a dud. If she was to show any flash or sparkle we'd be getting early signs of it by now.

    There have been none.
    To be fair, the MPs didn't exactly hand over a wonderful pair of candidates for the members to choose between.
    I couldn't back Jenrick due to his ethics and morals, and the stink around them.

    But I've no doubt he'd have been twice as effective day to day. He be on the airwaves all the time, contesting every issue and looking to set the agenda.

    When did you last hear from Kemi on anything, except the odd petulant tweet?
    Which is more important, the day-to-day or the next election?
    The two aren't mutually exclusive.
  • ydoethur said:

    Kemi Badenoch will be in trouble after the May locals if Reform pip her and outperform expectations, and probably in terminal trouble after the May 2026 round.

    At the moment, that's what I expect to happen.

    I thought the May locals had been cancelled, prior to the latest inept attempt to reorganise local government?
    Counties that are already unitary will definitely have elections. Of the counties that are still two-tier, I don't think anyone is expecting them all to play nicely and agree a plan in the next fortnight. It's only the tranche of counties that come up with a plan for the next wave where there's talk of cancelling the elections, because there will be a new council along in a minute. (Going live in 2026?)

    It's a mess, but it's the existing mess. And the Dictator Starmer stuff came from people still adjusting to being out of power themselves.

    (Me? I'm fairly happy with the model- the bottom-up map of regions and powers seems a lot like the approach Spain took to decentralise after Franco.)
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,329
    Andy_JS said:

    Angus Reid, gold standard

    Con 45%
    NDP 21%
    Lib 16%
    BQ 11%
    Grn 3%
    PPC 1%
    Oth 2%

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2025_Canadian_federal_election#National_polls

    Crossover!

    (For second place.)
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,321
    edited December 2024
    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.
  • squareroot2squareroot2 Posts: 6,869
    edited December 2024
    One would have thought that anyone but Starmer would benefit as Starmer is about as population as a turd in a swimming pool
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,119
    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage is the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want their chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    The numbers don't suggest it's much of a motivator.

    BTW, Britain is 0% Remainer, as there's nothing to Remain in. Unless you mean NATO or the Commonwealth?
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,315
    Dura_Ace said:

    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
    If that's her plan, the data in the header shows it's not working. Current Labour and Lib Dem supporters think Badenoch is just as horrible as Farage while almost as many Conservatives prefer him to her. Suggests Conservatives could fall further to Reform with a much smaller fall for Labour.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 19,035

    Should've been Cleverly.

    He was done in by his own supporters falling for Jenrick's nonsense.

    Cleverly is a lovely guy but an empty vase. What did he say or do?

    Same problem applies. And the MPs saw it.

    Only serious candidate is Jenrick but with ethics (which sadly he doesn't have).
    Cleverly was my favoured candidate, because he seems like a good egg. But he fumbled the leadership election so badly to end up third in the final MP's ballot, that you can't have any confidence in his competence to be leader.

    I agree that Jenrick was likely to be the most effective leader. He gave the impression of being the most shameless bastard, which is a positive attribute for an opposition leader. It's to the Tories credit that they didn't choose him, and I hope it was because of ethics issues.

    I think Luckyguy made a lot of Badenoch being lazy, and he appears to have been proved very right in only two months. Leader of the Opposition is the hardest and most thankless job in British politics, and she isn't rising to the challenge.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,319
    edited December 2024
    Voters may still be inclined to give Starmer the benefit of the doubt and prefer him as PM to Kemi. Yet that is less so for Labour. The latest Electoral Calculus poll average seat projection has Labour losing its majority and falling to 286 seats while the Tories reach 205 MPs, more than Hague, IDS or Howard ever reached.

    "Electoral Calculus" https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html


    So Kemi is clearly making progress even if not yet headed for Dowming Street. In fact on current polls Kemi will have the most gains for a Conservative Opposition Leader against a newly elected Labour government at
    the next general election since Churchill in 1950. By
    late 1951 Churchill was PM.

    The only Opposition Leader to defeat a newly elected government after one term since WW2 was Wilson in February 1974 but even then Heath won the popular vote in a hung parliament
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,523
    edited December 2024
    Andy_JS said:

    Angus Reid, gold standard

    Con 45%
    NDP 21%
    Lib 16%
    BQ 11%
    Grn 3%
    PPC 1%
    Oth 2%

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2025_Canadian_federal_election#National_polls

    I do hope that Kemi doesn't tweet this in the mistaken belief that she's doing really well.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,774
    Nigelb said:

    On similar lines, should the LibDems be aiming to move on from Sir Ed this Parliament ?

    Decentish chap, but he's served his purpose, and probably achieved as much as he's ever going to do. And will be 64 by the next election.

    Make the most of having a reasonably sized pool of replacements while it still exists.

    64? So, 14 years younger than Trump.
  • One would have thought that anyone but Starmer would benefit as Starmer is about as population as a turd in a swimming pool

    And yet, the currently-proffered "anyone else" still comes off worse. Presumably because a single turd in the swimming pool is better than a swimming pool full of sewage.

    The moment that a convincing alternative to Starmer breaks through, he's in trouble. At the moment though, he's still seen as the best of a bad lot.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,321
    edited December 2024
    Driver said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage is the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want their chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    The numbers don't suggest it's much of a motivator.

    BTW, Britain is 0% Remainer, as there's nothing to Remain in. Unless you mean NATO or the Commonwealth?
    I mean that 60% of Britons think that Farage's signature political cause was a mistake, and only 20% or so think it a success. That puts a ceiling on willingness to vote Reform.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,691
    edited December 2024
    FF43 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
    If that's her plan, the data in the header shows it's not working. Current Labour and Lib Dem supporters think Badenoch is just as horrible as Farage while almost as many Conservatives prefer him to her. Suggests Conservatives could fall further to Reform with a much smaller fall for Labour.
    The problem there is that everyone is making the assumption that Reform and the Tories are interchangeable.

    But most Reform voters are “none of the above” voters - and they aren’t going to be voting Tory for a while because the Tories failed to deliver in 2019

    Now that’s not to say they will vote Reform in 2028/9. What it does mean is that they are going to continue to say that they will vote reform for a while yet and that does mean if you are judging Kemi via Reform/Tory vote share she’s already lost.
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 9,043
    edited December 2024
    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    If Reform really do make a break through, I can see Labour getting more votes but fewer seats than if the Tories retain their position as the main opposition.

    There would be a visceral reaction to Farage in the cities but Labour could lose dozens of seats in the red wall. The Conservatives would get squeezed out of almost all their seats. You could just about envisage a Farage premiership in that event, but you'd still need a significant overall swing to the Right for Labour + Lib Dem to be overtaken.
  • Driver said:

    Great line from Laurie Whitwell in The Athletic:

    [Manchester] United are performing like an inverse trapeze artist - "Roll up, roll up, be dazzled at how low we can go!"

    Looking forward to next weekend's game at Anfield with a hope that it will be like the classic Simpsons Stop! Stop! He's already dead! but with a fear that its going to end up an anticlimactic 0-0 draw.
  • Just on Davey's age: it's perception that counts. It always surprised me that Ming Campbell was younger than Paddy Ashdown, when he seemed 20 years older.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,319
    edited December 2024
    FF43 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
    If that's her plan, the data in the header shows it's not working. Current Labour and Lib Dem supporters think Badenoch is just as horrible as Farage while almost as many Conservatives prefer him to her. Suggests
    Conservatives could fall
    further to Reform with a
    much smaller fall for Labour.
    No on present polls Reform
    are gaining redwall and ex industrial hard leave Labour seats Kemi can't reach while
    she was wins back rural seats and soft Leave town and suburban seats the Tories lost to Labour in July
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,315
    eek said:

    FF43 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
    If that's her plan, the data in the header shows it's not working. Current Labour and Lib Dem supporters think Badenoch is just as horrible as Farage while almost as many Conservatives prefer him to her. Suggests Conservatives could fall further to Reform with a much smaller fall for Labour.
    The problem there is that everyone is making the assumption that Reform and the Toproes are interchangeable.

    But most Reform voters are “none of the above” voters - and they aren’t going to be voting Tory for a while because the Tories failed to deliver in 2019
    Worse than that for Conservatives I think. They could fall even further. And that is exactly what Farage intends to achieve.
  • eek said:

    FF43 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
    If that's her plan, the data in the header shows it's not working. Current Labour and Lib Dem supporters think Badenoch is just as horrible as Farage while almost as many Conservatives prefer him to her. Suggests Conservatives could fall further to Reform with a much smaller fall for Labour.
    The problem there is that everyone is making the assumption that Reform and the Toproes are interchangeable.

    But most Reform voters are “none of the above” voters - and they aren’t going to be voting Tory for a while because the Tories failed to deliver in 2019
    And many Tory voters (and ex-Tory voters like myself) would vote for [almost] absolutely anyone over Farage.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,774
    Nigelb said:

    .

    The problem is more than just Badenoch.

    The problem is the Tories have just had 14 years in Downing Street so it almost doesn't matter what Badenoch says/does right now, even if she says exactly the right thing the public wants to hear it is met with a thought of "well why didn't you do that in office then?"

    Four years is a long-time to the next election though, so Badenoch needs to be seriously reflecting on what could be done better/differently and why the Tories should be back in Downing Street and what they would do. Not worrying about Twitter spats or soundbites.

    Some reflection that perhaps Starmer should have done more of to be better prepared than he is today.

    A ritual sacrifice, and the media attention around her replacement are probably the Tories' best chance of swerving oblivion now.

    Reform are (and this does not make me particularly happy) an existential threat to them.

    The alternative is a merger largely on Farage's terms.
    The Conservative Party have 24 times as many MPs, 102 times as many councillors, 8 times as many London Assembly members, and infinitely many more Senedd members, Scottish Parliament members, PCCs, Lords and directly elected mayors than Reform. Yes, Reform UK are a threat to the Tories, but I think we shouldn’t get carried away with predicting the Tories’ demise.
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,119
    Foxy said:

    Driver said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage is the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want their chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    The numbers don't suggest it's much of a motivator.

    BTW, Britain is 0% Remainer, as there's nothing to Remain in. Unless you mean NATO or the Commonwealth?
    I mean that 60% of Britons think that Farage's signature political cause was a mistake, and only 20% or so think it a success. That puts a ceiling on willingness to vote Reform.
    But that's looking backwards. On the European question, I rather suspect about 70% of the electorate is "we settled that years ago, why do you keep bringing it up?"
  • eekeek Posts: 28,691
    Eabhal said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    If Reform really do make a break through, I can see Labour getting more votes but fewer seats than if the Tories retain their position as the main opposition.

    There would be a visceral reaction to Farage in the cities but Labour could lose dozens of seats in the red wall. The Conservatives would get squeezed out of almost all their seats. You could just about envisage a Farage premiership in that event, but you'd still need a significant overall swing to the Right for Labour + Lib Dem to be overtaken.
    The 2024 Labour vote was as efficient as the Lib Dem vote… both parties will need a greater percentage of votes in the next election to retain the same number of seats…
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,315
    Eabhal said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    If Reform really do make a break through, I can see Labour getting more votes but fewer seats than if the Tories retain their position as the main opposition.

    There would be a visceral reaction to Farage in the cities but Labour could lose dozens of seats in the red wall. The Conservatives would get squeezed out of almost all their seats. You could just about envisage a Farage premiership in that event, but you'd still need a significant overall swing to the Right for Labour + Lib Dem to be overtaken.
    Yep. Hence Labour obsession with Reform. They are not particularly bothered about the Conservatives.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,321
    Nigelb said:

    On similar lines, should the LibDems be aiming to move on from Sir Ed this Parliament ?

    Decentish chap, but he's served his purpose, and probably achieved as much as he's ever going to do. And will be 64 by the next election.

    Make the most of having a reasonably sized pool of replacements while it still exists.

    I think Davey is enjoying having such a large LD party, and clearly ran a very good campaign.

    It's possible that the same "Fun Dad" campaign may look a bit tired by 2029, but it's clear that he has rebuilt the LD election machine.

    He gets to lead at the next GE. Indeed I would say that he is the most likely to be leading his party then, with Farage a close second. I think it quite likely that both Starmer and Badenoch will be replaced before the GE, particularly if Labour are not leading the polling.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,774
    ydoethur said:

    Kemi Badenoch will be in trouble after the May locals if Reform pip her and outperform expectations, and probably in terminal trouble after the May 2026 round.

    At the moment, that's what I expect to happen.

    I thought the May locals had been cancelled, prior to the latest inept attempt to reorganise local government?
    No. Some council elections may be cancelled due to the reorganisation, but there will definitely be a bunch of elections in May.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 19,035

    eek said:

    FF43 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
    If that's her plan, the data in the header shows it's not working. Current Labour and Lib Dem supporters think Badenoch is just as horrible as Farage while almost as many Conservatives prefer him to her. Suggests Conservatives could fall further to Reform with a much smaller fall for Labour.
    The problem there is that everyone is making the assumption that Reform and the Toproes are interchangeable.

    But most Reform voters are “none of the above” voters - and they aren’t going to be voting Tory for a while because the Tories failed to deliver in 2019
    And many Tory voters (and ex-Tory voters like myself) would vote for [almost] absolutely anyone over Farage.
    Indeed. But Farage is quite popular with Tory voters overall, and he might also win some Labour voters.

    It's simplistic to talk about him "uniting the right", but there's still potential for him to get to 30%. And if the rest of the votes are split five ways - Labour, Tories, Lib Dems, Greens and Nationalists - then that is plenty.
  • DriverDriver Posts: 5,119
    Rooney out at Plymouth - "mutual consent".
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,315
    eek said:

    Eabhal said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    If Reform really do make a break through, I can see Labour getting more votes but fewer seats than if the Tories retain their position as the main opposition.

    There would be a visceral reaction to Farage in the cities but Labour could lose dozens of seats in the red wall. The Conservatives would get squeezed out of almost all their seats. You could just about envisage a Farage premiership in that event, but you'd still need a significant overall swing to the Right for Labour + Lib Dem to be overtaken.
    The 2024 Labour vote was as efficient as the Lib Dem vote… both parties will need a greater percentage of votes in the next election to retain the same number of seats…
    Using Conservative willingness to consider Starmer instead of Farage as a proxy for willingness to consider voting Lib Dem, the above data also suggests the Con to Lib Dem surge has run its course.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,319
    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    No it was 48% Remainer
  • eek said:

    FF43 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
    If that's her plan, the data in the header shows it's not working. Current Labour and Lib Dem supporters think Badenoch is just as horrible as Farage while almost as many Conservatives prefer him to her. Suggests Conservatives could fall further to Reform with a much smaller fall for Labour.
    The problem there is that everyone is making the assumption that Reform and the Toproes are interchangeable.

    But most Reform voters are “none of the above” voters - and they aren’t going to be voting Tory for a while because the Tories failed to deliver in 2019
    And many Tory voters (and ex-Tory voters like myself) would vote for [almost] absolutely anyone over Farage.
    Indeed. But Farage is quite popular with Tory voters overall, and he might also win some Labour voters.

    It's simplistic to talk about him "uniting the right", but there's still potential for him to get to 30%. And if the rest of the votes are split five ways - Labour, Tories, Lib Dems, Greens and Nationalists - then that is plenty.
    The difference is that Farage is an exceptionally polarising figure and if a polarising figure is potential next PM then the rest tends to not split five ways though.

    This year the vote split many ways because Starmer who was presumptive next PM with his Ming 'vase strategy' was not a polarising figure so people felt safe to split in every other direction, but you only need to look at the prior couple of elections to see what happens when a polarising campaign is run.
  • HYUFD said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    No it was 48% Remainer
    It was 48%. Now it is 60%.

    The Boomers are sliding into their coffins and taking Brexit with them (like everything else they could get their grasping hands on)
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,321
    Driver said:

    Foxy said:

    Driver said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage is the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want their chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    The numbers don't suggest it's much of a motivator.

    BTW, Britain is 0% Remainer, as there's nothing to Remain in. Unless you mean NATO or the Commonwealth?
    I mean that 60% of Britons think that Farage's signature political cause was a mistake, and only 20% or so think it a success. That puts a ceiling on willingness to vote Reform.
    But that's looking backwards. On the European question, I rather suspect about 70% of the electorate is "we settled that years ago, why do you keep bringing it up?"
    I think when looking at forming a government Reform will be under the spotlight and Farages single lifetime achievement will count against him.

    Add in his laziness, Trumpism, and rum crew, as well as policies like ending the NHS, it will not be an appealing prospect for government.

    Reform are a party for people who complain loudly about everything but have never attempted to do anything constructive in their lives. They are a protest vote, not a party fit for government.
  • MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,831

    Kemi may yet have the last laugh over Reform and their data.

    Forget the accuracy of the numbers as Reform have been perhaps a little "too eager" to evidence and prove that is pretty accurate.

    The BIGGER and potentially MASSIVE problem for Reform and a saver for Kemi is that it would appear that anyone from anywhere in the World can register as a Member and more impactful, that anyone of any age can created an email address and join with no validation of where they are from, who they are, how old they are or even IF they exist.

    Now a £10 a pop ....with Billioniares / Multi Millionaires FUNDING them, it's a very very convenient back door and efficient way of data farming to created "alleged" mass Membership.

    It needs investigating for sure!

    Potential GOLD-DUST for Kemi and Labour!

    Reform’s whole MO is to swamp social media and give the impression of an unstoppable bandwagon.

    It’s about funding bots, useful idiots and fake members. After all to do so is just recycling money. I still feel they have a ceiling.
  • Driver said:

    Rooney out at Plymouth - "mutual consent".

    Wants to be free to take Anorim's job?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,321

    HYUFD said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    No it was 48% Remainer
    It was 48%. Now it is 60%.

    The Boomers are sliding into their coffins and taking Brexit with them (like everything else they could get their grasping hands on)
    And the ones who survive have changed their minds...
  • MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,831

    ydoethur said:

    Kemi Badenoch will be in trouble after the May locals if Reform pip her and outperform expectations, and probably in terminal trouble after the May 2026 round.

    At the moment, that's what I expect to happen.

    I thought the May locals had been cancelled, prior to the latest inept attempt to reorganise local government?
    No. Some council elections may be cancelled due to the reorganisation, but there will definitely be a bunch of elections in May.
    I suspect they will be cancelled in ydoethur’s Staffordshire fastness as it’s still a two tier system. But not in Shropshire.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,618

    eek said:

    FF43 said:

    Dura_Ace said:

    KB needs to realise that she should see off Farage before she e

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    If that is the plan, the execution leaves a fair bit to be desired. Kemi is a fighter, and she is fighting. It's just her choice of battlefields (RefUK membership figures, GB News presenter choices) are dumb.
    KB has to realise that she needs to see off Farage before she tackles SKS. Business before pleasure.
    If that's her plan, the data in the header shows it's not working. Current Labour and Lib Dem supporters think Badenoch is just as horrible as Farage while almost as many Conservatives prefer him to her. Suggests Conservatives could fall further to Reform with a much smaller fall for Labour.
    The problem there is that everyone is making the assumption that Reform and the Toproes are interchangeable.

    But most Reform voters are “none of the above” voters - and they aren’t going to be voting Tory for a while because the Tories failed to deliver in 2019
    And many Tory voters (and ex-Tory voters like myself) would vote for [almost] absolutely anyone over Farage.
    Indeed. But Farage is quite popular with Tory voters overall, and he might also win some Labour voters.

    It's simplistic to talk about him "uniting the right", but there's still potential for him to get to 30%. And if the rest of the votes are split five ways - Labour, Tories, Lib Dems, Greens and Nationalists - then that is plenty.
    I’m sceptical that “nice Britain/centrist dads” will all unite to keep out Reform. It seems to me that Reform are getting support from (a) people unhappy about mega-immigration (b) voters who want to stick it to the man. That’s a lot of people.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,870
    edited December 2024
    Good morning

    To the question does anyone support Kemi, I most certainly am and frankly the critics of her are, as I said yesterday, not her immediate audience

    I do not often agree with @Dura_Ace but he is correct in saying her approach should be to take on Farage and questions on Reforms membership numbers are fair, as are his predominant appearances on Question Time and GBNews

    It is less than 6 months since she became leader and in that time Starmer and Reeves have cratered in spectacular style, and as the government of the day they dominate the media attention leaving little left for the opposition to grab headlines, and that also includes Ed Davey

    The membership and mps seem content with her presently, and she has plenty of time to develop a policy platform and to be fair Mel Stride has already questioned the affordability of the triple lock

    I expect her to lead into the next GE, unless someone is elected in a by election who could be perceived a better choice as I do not see anyone in the current conservative mps

    Never mind, mark me down as a conservative satisfied with Kemi
  • EabhalEabhal Posts: 9,043
    eek said:

    Eabhal said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    If Reform really do make a break through, I can see Labour getting more votes but fewer seats than if the Tories retain their position as the main opposition.

    There would be a visceral reaction to Farage in the cities but Labour could lose dozens of seats in the red wall. The Conservatives would get squeezed out of almost all their seats. You could just about envisage a Farage premiership in that event, but you'd still need a significant overall swing to the Right for Labour + Lib Dem to be overtaken.
    The 2024 Labour vote was as efficient as the Lib Dem vote… both parties will need a greater percentage of votes in the next election to retain the same number of seats…
    The Labour vote could go from hyper efficient to grossly inefficient. Something mad like boosting up to 40% but actually losing net seats.

    I've changed my tune on this quite a bit after looking at all the seats in the north. Labour are vulnerable and kinda need Badenoch to keep splitting the vote.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,319
    Andy_JS said:

    Angus Reid, gold standard

    Con 45%
    NDP 21%
    Lib 16%
    BQ 11%
    Grn 3%
    PPC 1%
    Oth 2%

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2025_Canadian_federal_election#National_polls

    Different context given the Canadian Conservatives have been in opposition for over 9 years and lost three consecutive general elections while the UK Conservatives have only been in opposition for six months.

    Though when Trudeau took over the Liberals were third remember with the NDP official opposition. Most polls still have Trudeau's Liberals second still even if he likely loses power after a decade as PM
  • ClippPClippP Posts: 1,932
    Nigelb said:

    On similar lines, should the LibDems be aiming to move on from Sir Ed this Parliament ?

    Decentish chap, but he's served his purpose, and probably achieved as much as he's ever going to do. And will be 64 by the next election.

    Make the most of having a reasonably sized pool of replacements while it still exists.

    Not yet, Nigel. Most of the Lib Dem MPs are brand new and still learning the ropes. They need more time to make an impact on their colleagues, let alone Lib Dem members and the general public.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,691

    Driver said:

    Rooney out at Plymouth - "mutual consent".

    Wants to be free to take Anorim's job?
    If Man Utd’s aim is to have a worse manager with every appointment he’s the ideal choice to end the sequence.

    Because you really couldn’t pick a worse manager than Rooney - hopefully his career as a manager has ended
  • Nigelb said:

    On similar lines, should the LibDems be aiming to move on from Sir Ed this Parliament ?

    Decentish chap, but he's served his purpose, and probably achieved as much as he's ever going to do. And will be 64 by the next election.

    Make the most of having a reasonably sized pool of replacements while it still exists.

    Most Lib Dem MPs are very new. Firstly, they need to build up the ground game in their seats in the expectation of a less favourable environment next time (incumbency advantage isn't a given - it needs work). Secondly, they aren't generally that well known in the party and need to build a reputation.

    For those reasons, and simply that Davey far outperformed expectations in 2024, Lib Dems won't be in any hurry at all to replace. In any event, as others have mentioned, 64 would be older end of the normal range but hardly elderly for a party leader.
  • HYUFD said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    No it was 48% Remainer
    It was 48%. Now it is 60%.

    The Boomers are sliding into their coffins and taking Brexit with them (like everything else they could get their grasping hands on)
    It was 48% now it is 0%

    Leave and Remain aren't a thing anymore, its over and there's no point crying over spilt milk.

    There may be some who think its an idea to rejoin, but that's a completely different question and there's no credible movement for it and so there's no serious measurements on the support of that, or what it would mean with compromises that would have to be made.
  • MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,831

    One would have thought that anyone but Starmer would benefit as Starmer is about as population as a turd in a swimming pool

    And yet, the currently-proffered "anyone else" still comes off worse. Presumably because a single turd in the swimming pool is better than a swimming pool full of sewage.

    The moment that a convincing alternative to Starmer breaks through, he's in trouble. At the moment though, he's still seen as the best of a bad lot.
    I’m sure Clive Lewis will throw his hat in the ring in any leadership contest. And he’s the obvious reformer on the left.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 33,023
    HYUFD said:

    Andy_JS said:

    Angus Reid, gold standard

    Con 45%
    NDP 21%
    Lib 16%
    BQ 11%
    Grn 3%
    PPC 1%
    Oth 2%

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2025_Canadian_federal_election#National_polls

    Different context given the Canadian Conservatives have been in opposition for over 9 years and lost three consecutive general elections while the UK Conservatives have only been in opposition for six months.

    Though when Trudeau took over the Liberals were third remember with the NDP official opposition. Most polls still have Trudeau's Liberals second still even if he likely loses power after a decade as PM
    As I understand it there's currently heavy pressure on Trudeau to stand down from within his own party to avoid a pretty catastrophic election result in a few months' time. But he's very stubborn and it looks like he wants to stay to the bitter end.
  • Sandpit said:

    Nigelb said:

    Are there any remaining Kemi fans on PB, or is she now universally believed a dud ?

    Kemi's plan is to stay quiet for 2-3+ years before she rolls out lots of policy reviews. By that time people will have long made their minds up on her, and the Conservative Party, and they will land totally flat and be completely ignored.

    CCHQ wants to communicate that the "quietness" is down to the focus on this and internal Conservative party structures, whereas it's actually down to her passivity and lack of energy and drive.

    She doesn't seem to understand the party is like a cornered rat at the moment and needs to fight for its life.
    To be fair that strategy worked fine for Starmer, and he never even got as far as the policy reviews!
    Starmer won by default as the Tories imploded and it was 14 years since Labour were in office and the personnel had virtually all changed since then.

    That's not an option for Kemi.
    There has been this spell of faux outrage from Tories that (a) Labour won and (b) Labour are saying the economy and large parts of the country are broken. The reason why Labour won by default off such a thin bit is because the Tories had patently broken the economy and the country.

    Badenoch doesn’t want to accept anything was done wrong and instead wants to retreat to her comfort zone of attacking woke. May be appealing to Leon nd other obsessive, but most people just want things fixed. Starmer isn’t making any friends, but people won’t forget what the Tories did to them.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,774
    algarkirk said:

    SFAICS there is no point in thinking about winners and losers in the GE 2028/9. What can be thought about is the factors in play about doing well/better and doing badly/worse. There is a current astonishing situation in which no party is getting even 30% in the polls, with the very occasional exception. No-one is popular, no-one is guaranteed a place at the table, and no-one is totally out of things. Unusual.

    Tories. Can only do well if Labour fail and also Tories can present as absolutely united, principled, clear and outstanding and new WRT themselves, not as critics of Labour. We will remain utterly uninterested in their critiques of Labour. They had too long to do better.

    chance: 10%

    Labour. Can only do well if they communicate well, don't make unforced errors, have some luck, are seen to succeed reasonably well, don't fiscally crash and sort the politics of housing and migartion.

    Chance: 15%

    Reform: Do well if either of the above don't happen. Do very well if both don't happen.

    Looks like about 70% chance.

    I don't believe my own conclusion. But it still may be right. DYOR.

    You can get 5/2 on Reform UK most seats at the next general election, which implies a 29% chance. Are those convinced of Reform UK’s rise here betting on it?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 49,321

    HYUFD said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage as the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want the chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    No it was 48% Remainer
    It was 48%. Now it is 60%.

    The Boomers are sliding into their coffins and taking Brexit with them (like everything else they could get their grasping hands on)
    It was 48% now it is 0%

    Leave and Remain aren't a thing anymore, its over and there's no point crying over spilt milk.

    There may be some who think its an idea to rejoin, but that's a completely different question and there's no credible movement for it and so there's no serious measurements on the support of that, or what it would mean with compromises that would have to be made.
    You may wish it so, but it isn't.

    Tories expect voters to bear electoral grudges like the cut to WFP but forget the fiasco of Brexit? Not likely!


  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,238
    Foxy said:

    Driver said:

    Rooney out at Plymouth - "mutual consent".

    His managerial career is one of successive failure.

    When will owners realise that just because a person was a good player, it doesn't make them a good manager? It's a completely different skill set.
    Yes, unless someone has contacts at a big club and can bring players in on loan (Fergie Jnr at Preston, Super Frankie Lampard at Derby), then it's a waste of time (with ex-England players anyway).
  • Driver said:

    Foxy said:

    Driver said:

    Foxy said:

    On topic. The interesting choice in the header is Starmer vs Farage in a forced choice.

    There isn't much enthusiasm for Starmerism at present, though plenty of time for that to change, but having Farage is the alternative is a great motivator.

    Britain is about 60% Remainer, it doesn't want their chief architect of Brexit as PM. Neither does it want a Trump kiss-arse.

    The numbers don't suggest it's much of a motivator.

    BTW, Britain is 0% Remainer, as there's nothing to Remain in. Unless you mean NATO or the Commonwealth?
    I mean that 60% of Britons think that Farage's signature political cause was a mistake, and only 20% or so think it a success. That puts a ceiling on willingness to vote Reform.
    But that's looking backwards. On the European question, I rather suspect about 70% of the electorate is "we settled that years ago, why do you keep bringing it up?"
    I think the point is not so much they want to revisit that choice, but them thinking that way means it's pretty unlikely they are of the mindset Nige deserves a chance in No.10. If you think Brexit is a mistake you are probably not a right-wing populist.
Sign In or Register to comment.