Ahead of the Greek PM's visit to the UK tomorrow, most Britons think the Elgin Marbles should be returned to GreeceReturn to Greece: 53%Keep in Britain: 24%https://t.co/JRQedtTVfi pic.twitter.com/SOshhXJA5Z
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
It’s not his call.
It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
*Apparently* there were US air strikes against Iranian-backed militia in eastern Syria last night.
Not seeing this reported anywhere sane, but it was on Twix.
Yes, I saw that, but hesitated to post it without confirmation. The source was a pretty regular Syrian conflict reporter, FWIW.
If true, that means Russia and the USA are on the same side?!?
No. Both Russia and Iran back Assad (though I would not be surprised if Iran was sponsoring other groups as well.)
Thankyou. It’s so incredibly complex
I’ve seen some hideous evidence that these rebels - or some of them - are easily as bad as isis. Islamist maniacs who will impose brutal sharia law a la Taliban
Which leaves me in the impossibly horrible position of maybe hoping Assad prevails
Initial reports on the ground from Aleppo suggest not. But then again, similar claims of reasonableness were actually made for ISIS in the very early days.
There are, I am afraid, grotesque videos. I don’t think they are fake
This is probably ISIS 2.0 and I reckon anyone hoping for the rebels to be good guys are like those who hoped the new Taliban would be more reasonable. That’s the Taliban who have just made it illegal for women to speak
I'm not expecting good guys. Just hoping for something slightly better than Assad. We'll see.
We have already seen what rebel controlled Aleppo was like, hence the joyous Christmas celebrations when they fucked off. These will obviously be exactly the same for their bloody and hopefully short reign, and as I said to Tim the other day, if you found yourself in a no man's land between SAA held territory and rebel held Aleppo, you'd run screaming into the former to protect you, so I think the citizens of Aleppo would probably tell you where you could file your 'hopes', especially if they have the misfortune to be Christian, Druze, Alawite, female, or anything apart from an Islamist nutter.
You're missing out some important steps.
City under Assad's control: death to anyone who dares disagree with him. City under IS control: death to anyone who dare disagree with them.
Most of the population, as in France during WW2, just buckle down and try to make the best of what they can, without popping their heads above the parapet. Some of these rebel groups - especially the Kurds - may well be 'better' than both those options.
But don't make the mistake of believing Assad is anything other than a mass-murdering shit.
No. The Assad regime cracks down on ruthlessly on attempts to undermine it. The Islamists crack down ruthlessly on others for existing. The two can't even be compared.
It is especially galling to see those who have more than a passing sympathy with woke ideals be so glib about the passing of authority from a tolerant society to an Islamist one. That's clearly how far your espousal of feminist values goes.
You think Assad was 'tolerant' ?
You care so much about people that you spread Putin's lies about MH17, however contradictory that latest lie was. If I'm 'woke', then at least I'm at peace that I'm not a stupid shill for a fascist, imperialist regime.
My point is that you're not woke - if your wokeness was anything more than an empty hypocritical pose, you wouldn't be cheerleading the unseating of a dictator who has preserved religious and ethnic tolerance, in favour of a theocratic Islamist regime that will strip the rights of women to wear what they wish, communicate with whom they wish, and be educated and get a job if they so wish.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
It’s not his call.
It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
Take copies, and a backup second. Yes, time to discuss and organise return.
We have the technology to make perfect copies now. It’s like dinosaur fossils. How many people visit museums and are deceived by copies of fossils?
Physically? For heavy, porous stone? Very difficult, probably impossible, without doing some damage, even if most of us wouldn't notice. Just think of the mould release agent soaking into the marble.
I think I'd be fine with loaning them back, providing the Greeks give something of equal value as security. They keep the marbles, the forfeit with other thing.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
It’s not his call.
It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
Ah yes, that. No need for anyone to skirt around the ownership issue. But would it be good enough for the capital of philosophy?
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
Take copies, and a backup second. Yes, time to discuss and organise return.
We have the technology to make perfect copies now. It’s like dinosaur fossils. How many people visit museums and are deceived by copies of fossils?
Physically? For heavy, porous stone? Very difficult, probably impossible, without doing some damage, even if most of us wouldn't notice. Just think of the mould release agent soaking into the marble.
I think I'd be fine with loaning them back, providing the Greeks give something of equal value as security. They keep the marbles, the forfeit with other thing.
I’d want the Acropolis and have it installed in the North.
I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.
*Apparently* there were US air strikes against Iranian-backed militia in eastern Syria last night.
Not seeing this reported anywhere sane, but it was on Twix.
Yes, I saw that, but hesitated to post it without confirmation. The source was a pretty regular Syrian conflict reporter, FWIW.
If true, that means Russia and the USA are on the same side?!?
No. Both Russia and Iran back Assad (though I would not be surprised if Iran was sponsoring other groups as well.)
Thankyou. It’s so incredibly complex
I’ve seen some hideous evidence that these rebels - or some of them - are easily as bad as isis. Islamist maniacs who will impose brutal sharia law a la Taliban
Which leaves me in the impossibly horrible position of maybe hoping Assad prevails
Initial reports on the ground from Aleppo suggest not. But then again, similar claims of reasonableness were actually made for ISIS in the very early days.
There are, I am afraid, grotesque videos. I don’t think they are fake
This is probably ISIS 2.0 and I reckon anyone hoping for the rebels to be good guys are like those who hoped the new Taliban would be more reasonable. That’s the Taliban who have just made it illegal for women to speak
I'm not expecting good guys. Just hoping for something slightly better than Assad. We'll see.
We have already seen what rebel controlled Aleppo was like, hence the joyous Christmas celebrations when they fucked off. These will obviously be exactly the same for their bloody and hopefully short reign, and as I said to Tim the other day, if you found yourself in a no man's land between SAA held territory and rebel held Aleppo, you'd run screaming into the former to protect you, so I think the citizens of Aleppo would probably tell you where you could file your 'hopes', especially if they have the misfortune to be Christian, Druze, Alawite, female, or anything apart from an Islamist nutter.
You're missing out some important steps.
City under Assad's control: death to anyone who dares disagree with him. City under IS control: death to anyone who dare disagree with them.
Most of the population, as in France during WW2, just buckle down and try to make the best of what they can, without popping their heads above the parapet. Some of these rebel groups - especially the Kurds - may well be 'better' than both those options.
But don't make the mistake of believing Assad is anything other than a mass-murdering shit.
No. The Assad regime cracks down on ruthlessly on attempts to undermine it. The Islamists crack down ruthlessly on others for existing. The two can't even be compared.
It is especially galling to see those who have more than a passing sympathy with woke ideals be so glib about the passing of authority from a tolerant society to an Islamist one. That's clearly how far your espousal of feminist values goes.
You think Assad was 'tolerant' ?
You care so much about people that you spread Putin's lies about MH17, however contradictory that latest lie was. If I'm 'woke', then at least I'm at peace that I'm not a stupid shill for a fascist, imperialist regime.
My point is that you're not woke - if your wokeness was anything more than an empty hypocritical pose, you wouldn't be cheerleading the unseating of a dictator who has preserved religious and ethnic tolerance, in favour of a theocratic Islamist regime that will strip the rights of women to wear what they wish, communicate with whom they wish, and be educated and get a job if they so wish.
And my point is that you're a repeated shill for an evil regime.
Also, you have changed your view from 'tolerance' to 'religious and ethnic tolerance' - and the latter is very debatable - just ask the Kurds.
I'm not 'cheerleading' the unseating of Assad. I'm saying that, unlike you and HYUFD, I don't see him as the future of Syria, because his enormous crimes are similar to those of his 'enemies'. Whereas you, as ever, cheer-lead for Russia and Putin.
*Apparently* there were US air strikes against Iranian-backed militia in eastern Syria last night.
Not seeing this reported anywhere sane, but it was on Twix.
Yes, I saw that, but hesitated to post it without confirmation. The source was a pretty regular Syrian conflict reporter, FWIW.
If true, that means Russia and the USA are on the same side?!?
No. Both Russia and Iran back Assad (though I would not be surprised if Iran was sponsoring other groups as well.)
Thankyou. It’s so incredibly complex
I’ve seen some hideous evidence that these rebels - or some of them - are easily as bad as isis. Islamist maniacs who will impose brutal sharia law a la Taliban
Which leaves me in the impossibly horrible position of maybe hoping Assad prevails
Initial reports on the ground from Aleppo suggest not. But then again, similar claims of reasonableness were actually made for ISIS in the very early days.
There are, I am afraid, grotesque videos. I don’t think they are fake
This is probably ISIS 2.0 and I reckon anyone hoping for the rebels to be good guys are like those who hoped the new Taliban would be more reasonable. That’s the Taliban who have just made it illegal for women to speak
I'm not expecting good guys. Just hoping for something slightly better than Assad. We'll see.
We have already seen what rebel controlled Aleppo was like, hence the joyous Christmas celebrations when they fucked off. These will obviously be exactly the same for their bloody and hopefully short reign, and as I said to Tim the other day, if you found yourself in a no man's land between SAA held territory and rebel held Aleppo, you'd run screaming into the former to protect you, so I think the citizens of Aleppo would probably tell you where you could file your 'hopes', especially if they have the misfortune to be Christian, Druze, Alawite, female, or anything apart from an Islamist nutter.
You're missing out some important steps.
City under Assad's control: death to anyone who dares disagree with him. City under IS control: death to anyone who dare disagree with them.
Most of the population, as in France during WW2, just buckle down and try to make the best of what they can, without popping their heads above the parapet. Some of these rebel groups - especially the Kurds - may well be 'better' than both those options.
But don't make the mistake of believing Assad is anything other than a mass-murdering shit.
No. The Assad regime cracks down on ruthlessly on attempts to undermine it. The Islamists crack down ruthlessly on others for existing. The two can't even be compared.
It is especially galling to see those who have more than a passing sympathy with woke ideals be so glib about the passing of authority from a tolerant society to an Islamist one. That's clearly how far your espousal of feminist values goes.
You think Assad was 'tolerant' ?
You care so much about people that you spread Putin's lies about MH17, however contradictory that latest lie was. If I'm 'woke', then at least I'm at peace that I'm not a stupid shill for a fascist, imperialist regime.
My point is that you're not woke - if your wokeness was anything more than an empty hypocritical pose, you wouldn't be cheerleading the unseating of a dictator who has preserved religious and ethnic tolerance, in favour of a theocratic Islamist regime that will strip the rights of women to wear what they wish, communicate with whom they wish, and be educated and get a job if they so wish.
Your point is that we should accept you're a Syria expert. In reality, none of us are.
Nut to pretend Assad is anything but a mass murderer, who has used chemical weapons multiple times on civilian targets, is just pitiful stuff.
Take copies, and a backup second. Yes, time to discuss and organise return.
We have the technology to make perfect copies now. It’s like dinosaur fossils. How many people visit museums and are deceived by copies of fossils?
Physically? For heavy, porous stone? Very difficult, probably impossible, without doing some damage, even if most of us wouldn't notice. Just think of the mould release agent soaking into the marble.
I think I'd agree. The decision is understandable but wrong. You - if you're a Dem - have to say both those things. If you omit the understandable you look like you're lacking in common empathy for a good man and doing Trump's work for him. If you omit wrong you're giving away too much moral high ground and contributing to the slide away from civilised norms, which also helps Trump.
I don't care about the rights and wrongs. What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.
Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
No, but I wouldn't be asking them nicely. It's all part and parcel of the "who does the state act for", which seems to be an underlying theme of mine. The State should act for the country and the people within it, and if that means being unfair to another country, that is not a problem. We are losing sight of what the nation state should do and its purpose.
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
All governments inherit legacies from their predecessors. Cameron in 2010 inherited after the crash of 2008. He could also point to Browns failures to follow sound fiscal rules over his time as CoE, and the profligacy of the public private investment model, which in many case we are still paying for today. Blair could rightly point to decades of underinvestment under the Tories when he came to power.
Yes Starmer has inherited a mess. Not all of the Tories making, for sure, Covid and Ukraine have buggered many incumbent governments. But there is a lot else wrong in the country too. The NHS waiting lists have grown, despite more money. There seems to be a clear correlation between Labour, the Tories and the direction of travel for waiting lists in the NHS.
I’m no economist, but I do at least understand that a nations finances is not the same as an individuals. But we pay so much in interest that you have to wonder.
The Turks are the one who blew up the Parthenon in the first place...
"After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "
"The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."
The Turks are the one who blew up the Parthenon in the first place...
"After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "
"The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."
I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
Entirely agree. Hi res copies, return the originals, agreement on academic access, and tell the story. Best of all worlds.
Pretty much like Trajan's Column cast in the BM. Though that really deserves being whole, as opposed to in halves, with platforms to allow you to see closer at the various levels. Something they cannot really do with the original.
I think I'd be fine with loaning them back, providing the Greeks give something of equal value as security. They keep the marbles, the forfeit with other thing.
That's very creative and "transactional", I must say.
Have the Greeks got anything stolen from us to use though?
The Turks are the one who blew up the Parthenon in the first place...
"After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "
"The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."
The Turks are the one who blew up the Parthenon in the first place...
"After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "
"The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."
*Apparently* there were US air strikes against Iranian-backed militia in eastern Syria last night.
Not seeing this reported anywhere sane, but it was on Twix.
Yes, I saw that, but hesitated to post it without confirmation. The source was a pretty regular Syrian conflict reporter, FWIW.
If true, that means Russia and the USA are on the same side?!?
No. Both Russia and Iran back Assad (though I would not be surprised if Iran was sponsoring other groups as well.)
Thankyou. It’s so incredibly complex
I’ve seen some hideous evidence that these rebels - or some of them - are easily as bad as isis. Islamist maniacs who will impose brutal sharia law a la Taliban
Which leaves me in the impossibly horrible position of maybe hoping Assad prevails
Initial reports on the ground from Aleppo suggest not. But then again, similar claims of reasonableness were actually made for ISIS in the very early days.
There are, I am afraid, grotesque videos. I don’t think they are fake
This is probably ISIS 2.0 and I reckon anyone hoping for the rebels to be good guys are like those who hoped the new Taliban would be more reasonable. That’s the Taliban who have just made it illegal for women to speak
I'm not expecting good guys. Just hoping for something slightly better than Assad. We'll see.
We have already seen what rebel controlled Aleppo was like, hence the joyous Christmas celebrations when they fucked off. These will obviously be exactly the same for their bloody and hopefully short reign, and as I said to Tim the other day, if you found yourself in a no man's land between SAA held territory and rebel held Aleppo, you'd run screaming into the former to protect you, so I think the citizens of Aleppo would probably tell you where you could file your 'hopes', especially if they have the misfortune to be Christian, Druze, Alawite, female, or anything apart from an Islamist nutter.
You're missing out some important steps.
City under Assad's control: death to anyone who dares disagree with him. City under IS control: death to anyone who dare disagree with them.
Most of the population, as in France during WW2, just buckle down and try to make the best of what they can, without popping their heads above the parapet. Some of these rebel groups - especially the Kurds - may well be 'better' than both those options.
But don't make the mistake of believing Assad is anything other than a mass-murdering shit.
No. The Assad regime cracks down on ruthlessly on attempts to undermine it. The Islamists crack down ruthlessly on others for existing. The two can't even be compared.
It is especially galling to see those who have more than a passing sympathy with woke ideals be so glib about the passing of authority from a tolerant society to an Islamist one. That's clearly how far your espousal of feminist values goes.
You think Assad was 'tolerant' ?
You care so much about people that you spread Putin's lies about MH17, however contradictory that latest lie was. If I'm 'woke', then at least I'm at peace that I'm not a stupid shill for a fascist, imperialist regime.
My point is that you're not woke - if your wokeness was anything more than an empty hypocritical pose, you wouldn't be cheerleading the unseating of a dictator who has preserved religious and ethnic tolerance, in favour of a theocratic Islamist regime that will strip the rights of women to wear what they wish, communicate with whom they wish, and be educated and get a job if they so wish.
Your point is that we should accept you're a Syria expert. In reality, none of us are.
Nut to pretend Assad is anything but a mass murderer, who has used chemical weapons multiple times on civilian targets, is just pitiful stuff.
No, that's absolutely not my point, I am absolutely *not* an expert, I am stating simple facts, acknowledged by most here, unless they're policing 'PB morale'.
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
Or as Mick put it You can’t always get what you want You can’t always get what you want But if you try sometimes, you might find you get what you need.
Unfortunately the last budget was neither what we wanted nor what we needed.
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
I have, and frankly found them underwhelming. Unlike (say) Trajan's column, or the fascinating Rosetta Stone.
The issue, as is often the case, is that they are more political than archaeological. if we give them up, in the eyes of many, we lose a little bit of prestige and power. And likewise, the Greeks want them, in part (*), because they have become a symbol.
If this was not the case, one or either could just do with casts.
Therefore any 'solution' has to be one that allows both sides to preserve, and give, a little face.
I don't care about the rights and wrongs. What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.
Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
No, but I wouldn't be asking them nicely. It's all part and parcel of the "who does the state act for", which seems to be an underlying theme of mine. The State should act for the country and the people within it, and if that means being unfair to another country, that is not a problem. We are losing sight of what the nation state should do and its purpose.
But hang on. I'm British and I'd feel better with those Marbles back in Greece and most Brits agree with me. So under that principle of the State acting exclusively for its own people (which I don't really agree with but let's go with it for the sake of argument) shouldn't they be returned?
I think I'd be fine with loaning them back, providing the Greeks give something of equal value as security. They keep the marbles, the forfeit with other thing.
That's very creative and "transactional", I must say.
Have the Greeks got anything stolen from us to use though?
Obviously the 2004 Euros, which Greece won when it should have been ours, as ever.
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
All governments inherit legacies from their predecessors. Cameron in 2010 inherited after the crash of 2008. He could also point to Browns failures to follow sound fiscal rules over his time as CoE, and the profligacy of the public private investment model, which in many case we are still paying for today. Blair could rightly point to decades of underinvestment under the Tories when he came to power.
Yes Starmer has inherited a mess. Not all of the Tories making, for sure, Covid and Ukraine have buggered many incumbent governments. But there is a lot else wrong in the country too. The NHS waiting lists have grown, despite more money. There seems to be a clear correlation between Labour, the Tories and the direction of travel for waiting lists in the NHS.
I’m no economist, but I do at least understand that a nations finances is not the same as an individuals. But we pay so much in interest that you have to wonder.
I think Starmer’s problem partly stems from laying it on a bit thick, and not being a particularly charismatic salesman.
Much has been written about Labour’s tactics since the election taking on a similar tone to those Cameron, Clegg and Osborne employed against Labour back in 2010. I.e - spend the first few months talking about how much of a mess you inherited, dine out on it down the line. Labour might still be able to do this, but I think the circumstances were different this year and they fought the last battle.
Everyone knew the Tories made a mess of things. What people were after was probably less of the doom and gloom and more of the why and how to fix it. I think people were looking for solutions. What instead we have are very sober, mournful dialogues from Starmer about how bad everything is and how it will take time to fix. But I think the issue this time is that they are being charged with talking the country down and actively pursuing policies that won’t make things better. That is the problem.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
It’s not his call.
It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
How much a year does the government propose to pay this time?
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
It’s not his call.
It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
How much a year does the government propose to pay this time?
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
It’s not his call.
It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
How much a year does the government propose to pay this time?
Leasehold tenure? Feu duty?
I think this government thinks that it is on the side of the tenant so they assume that they have to pay.
I don't care about the rights and wrongs. What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.
Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
No, but I wouldn't be asking them nicely. It's all part and parcel of the "who does the state act for", which seems to be an underlying theme of mine. The State should act for the country and the people within it, and if that means being unfair to another country, that is not a problem. We are losing sight of what the nation state should do and its purpose.
But hang on. I'm British and I'd feel better with those Marbles back in Greece and most Brits agree with me. So under that principle of the State acting exclusively for its own people (which I don't really agree with but let's go with it for the sake of argument) shouldn't they be returned?
We can return them on loan but if national museums are only allowed to keep objects from their nation permanently there would be few objects left in them.
Notably a plurality of Reform voters wish to keep the marbles in the UK and nearly half of Tories wish to keep them in the British Museum too
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect
We'll see.
If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have to find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.
Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.
I don't care about the rights and wrongs. What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.
Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
No, but I wouldn't be asking them nicely. It's all part and parcel of the "who does the state act for", which seems to be an underlying theme of mine. The State should act for the country and the people within it, and if that means being unfair to another country, that is not a problem. We are losing sight of what the nation state should do and its purpose.
But hang on. I'm British and I'd feel better with those Marbles back in Greece and most Brits agree with me. So under that principle of the State acting exclusively for its own people (which I don't really agree with but let's go with it for the sake of argument) shouldn't they be returned?
No.
Ha, got you there, haven't I. PB's top brainbox flummoxed.
We can return them on loan but if national museums are only allowed to keep objects from their nation permanently there would be few objects left in them.
Notably a plurality of Reform voters wish to keep the marbles in the UK and nearly half of Tories wish to keep them in the British Museum too
Also notably, and coincidentally, a plurality of Reform voters know nothing whatsoever about the marbles or their origin.
We can return them on loan but if national museums are only allowed to keep objects from their nation permanently there would be few objects left in them.
Notably a plurality of Reform voters wish to keep the marbles in the UK and nearly half of Tories wish to keep them in the British Museum too
Also notably, and coincidentally, a plurality of Reform voters know nothing whatsoever about the marbles or their origin.
Surprise surprise.
I wish yougov could devise an IQ test as part of their next opinion poll question....
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect
We'll see.
If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.
Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.
2010-2015 is a generation away? Perhaps in Scotland.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
There should be a few test questions such as what colour are they? How long are they? What are they made of?
I simply don’t believe 23% of the population have ever been to the British museum.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
Is there any information on how many of that 23% fall into the category of 'I was dragged there on a school trip' rather than a genuine interest in seeing them as an adult?
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect
We'll see.
If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.
Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.
2010-2015 is a generation away? Perhaps in Scotland.
Coalitions are inherently unstable because they involve keeping at least two parties happy. But point taken. I certainly think that events since 2015 have clouded many a memory.
I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
The British Museum had nearly six million visitors last year. Now, sure, large numbers will be foreign tourists, and repeat visitors, but half a million first-time British visitors a year is possible. Would add up to 15 million in 30 years.
So you wouldn't even need as many as 500,000 first-time British visitors a year.
So here is a 'solution' that seems reasonable to me, and is therefore impossible to happen.
Some perfect copies are made of the marbles. Half are sent back to Greece, we keep the other half. Every two or three years, we cycle them, with them giving us half of their real ones, and we give them half of our real ones. Neither country 'owns' them; we share them.
In conjunction with this, a VR experience is created, a little like the excellent MAV museum at Herculaneum (*), allowing people to view what they are like, and would have been like. This is maintained between ourselves and Greece. This is available in person (if we want), or online via VR. This will allow viewers to see them in context; which neither Greece or we will do.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
There should be a few test questions such as what colour are they? How long are they? What are they made of?
I simply don’t believe 23% of the population have ever been to the British museum.
Indeed. I suspect some of that 23% think they look like the things with which one plays KerPlunk.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
There should be a few test questions such as what colour are they? How long are they? What are they made of?
I simply don’t believe 23% of the population have ever been to the British museum.
One thing I do wonder about. It's not so long since the one with the dinosaurs was still called the British Museum (Natural History), historically a spinoff from [edit] the BM. Though loosely called the Natural History Museum long ago, when hippos roamed South Ken and we were young. .. ah, on checking, it was still part of the BM legally in 1963, and didn't chamge its name from BM(NH) till 1992, so if there was an official brass plate on the front ...
And where do you find marble? In a geological museum - which merged with the Nat Hist M [edit] next door some years back but was always accessible by internal corridor from it and is otherwise physically still there ...
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.
But from last year: ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
The British Museum had nearly six million visitors last year. Now, sure, large numbers will be foreign tourists, and repeat visitors, but half a million first-time British visitors a year is possible. Would add up to 15 million in 30 years.
So you wouldn't even need as many as 500,000 first-time British visitors a year.
You start running into repeats though on that timescale - mum or grandpa with the children, or on their own.
I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.
I certainly couldn't give a monkey's either.
No idea why we have this debate every few years.
And that's why eventually they will be given back, and why they keep asking. Eventually enough in the UK won't care.
It's not that different to Argentina continuing to press about the Falklands, though probably with less success there (partly because of their weird framing of the issue as though it were not a matter of imperial lines on maps arguing).
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect
We'll see.
If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have to find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.
Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.
I agree with most of your post, but not your somewhat incongruous contention that they are "terrible politicians". How many "terrible politicians" have masterminded landslides of that scale and inflicted the worst defeat on their prime opponents in history?
(And as for gilt yields, we used to hear updates every five minutes on here from the PB Tories. They have become strangely silent on the matter in recent weeks).
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect
We'll see.
If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.
Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.
2010-2015 is a generation away? Perhaps in Scotland.
Only a decade, but the sort of decade where centuries happened.
I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect
We'll see.
If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have to find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.
Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.
Re your last paragraph the same could be said about Johnson in 2019 but we know how that turned our
The tests facing Starmer are the May 25 locals, the May 26 Scottish and Welsh devolved elections, and then the next election is very much coming into focus
His problem is the terrible budget and I have said previously that my budget would have been very much pro business and growth
Increase taxes to 25% and eliminate NI for all those working
Increase tax allowance to £15,000
Abolish triple lock and change to inflation plus 1%
I think I'd agree. The decision is understandable but wrong. You - if you're a Dem - have to say both those things. If you omit the understandable you look like you're lacking in common empathy for a good man and doing Trump's work for him. If you omit wrong you're giving away too much moral high ground and contributing to the slide away from civilised norms, which also helps Trump.
I think I'd agree. The decision is understandable but wrong. You - if you're a Dem - have to say both those things. If you omit the understandable you look like you're lacking in common empathy for a good man and doing Trump's work for him. If you omit wrong you're giving away too much moral high ground and contributing to the slide away from civilised norms, which also helps Trump.
I did point out in 2020 (edit) when Biden was running in the primaries that the influence-peddling by his son should have made Biden ineligible to be Democratic candidate. Now we've got this shit, which will justify a ton of pardons and antidemocratic bollocks from Trump, on top of Biden screwing up the Dem's chances of beating Trump this year. Totally predictable, and yes 'understandable'. But isn't it a few years too late for Democrats to be condemning this now?
I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.
I certainly couldn't give a monkey's either.
No idea why we have this debate every few years.
Suspect it's another of those quieter majority ("they are Greek history and we wouldn't do what Lord Elgin did nowadays") against a louder minority ("they belong to us now") things.
Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight. Make a virtue of a poor deal.
What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
I have, and frankly found them underwhelming. Unlike (say) Trajan's column, or the fascinating Rosetta Stone.
The issue, as is often the case, is that they are more political than archaeological. if we give them up, in the eyes of many, we lose a little bit of prestige and power. And likewise, the Greeks want them, in part (*), because they have become a symbol.
If this was not the case, one or either could just do with casts.
Therefore any 'solution' has to be one that allows both sides to preserve, and give, a little face.
(*) Or parts...
Yes, it's only partly about the marbles, or whatever artifact nation x chooses to seek or retain as they case may be.
Correct me please if I have this wrong but my understanding is that Elgin effectively rescued the marbles. The Greeks weren't interested in them and would probably have ground them into dust to make concrete.*
This doesn't of course mean that they are legally ours, and even if they are I'd have thought it was about time they were handed back, if only as a gesture of goodwill to a friendly democratic nation. The only reason for hesitation would be the matter of encouraging a zillion other claims, mostly spurious too.
Maybe leaseback makes sense.
* Yes, I know I could Google this, but I generally find asking PB is quicker and more accurate.
Comments
But yes, there is a reasonable case that they should go back to Greece.
As a father, I get it. But as someone who wants people to believe in public service again, it’s a setback.
https://x.com/RepGregLandsman/status/1863591569363804388
And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
Make a virtue of a poor deal.
But laser raster scanning or photogrammetry ...
https://www.3d-fossils.ac.uk/home.html
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/12/02/jaguar-barbie-pink-concept-electric-car-leaked-online/
I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here
In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees
As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period
There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November
Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers
Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker
I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable
However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world
When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
Levelling up and all that jazz.
Also, you have changed your view from 'tolerance' to 'religious and ethnic tolerance' - and the latter is very debatable - just ask the Kurds.
I'm not 'cheerleading' the unseating of Assad. I'm saying that, unlike you and HYUFD, I don't see him as the future of Syria, because his enormous crimes are similar to those of his 'enemies'. Whereas you, as ever, cheer-lead for Russia and Putin.
Well done, comrade!
In reality, none of us are.
Nut to pretend Assad is anything but a mass murderer, who has used chemical weapons multiple times on civilian targets, is just pitiful stuff.
George Osborne collects share of £30m after record profits at City advisory firm
Ex-chancellor one of three partners to share sum at Robey Warshaw, co-founded by ‘trillion-dollar man’ Simon Robey
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/nov/28/george-osborne-collects-share-of-30m-after-record-profits-at-city-advisory-firm
The Greeks are still upset about the time the BM took wire brushes to the Marbles, and ISTR that was a century or so ago.
So, it is either health, family, or defenestration (not literal...)
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/02/intel-ceo-pat-gelsinger
Yes Starmer has inherited a mess. Not all of the Tories making, for sure, Covid and Ukraine have buggered many incumbent governments. But there is a lot else wrong in the country too. The NHS waiting lists have grown, despite more money. There seems to be a clear correlation between Labour, the Tories and the direction of travel for waiting lists in the NHS.
I’m no economist, but I do at least understand that a nations finances is not the same as an individuals. But we pay so much in interest that you have to wonder.
"After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenon
"The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_the_Acropolis_(1687)
ὁπόσα ἐν τοῖς καλουμένοις ἀετοῖς κεῖται, πάντα ἐς τὴν Ἀθηνᾶς ἔχει γένεσιν, τὰ δὲ ὄπισθεν ἡ Ποσειδῶνος πρὸς Ἀθηνᾶν ἐστιν ἔρις ὑπὲρ τῆς γῆς: αὐτὸ δὲ ἔκ τε ἐλέφαντος τὸ ἄγαλμα καὶ χρησμοῦ πεποίηται. μέσῳ μὲν οὖν ἐπίκειταί οἱ τῷ κράνει Σφιγγὸς εἰκών—ἃ δὲ ἐς τὴν Σφίγγα λέγεται, γράψω προελθόντος ἐς τὰ Βοιώτιά μοι τοῦ λόγου—, καθ᾽ ἑκάτερον δὲ τοῦ κράνους γρῦπές εἰσιν ἐπειργασμένοι.
Actual guidebook from millennia ago.
Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.
It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
Have the Greeks got anything stolen from us to use though?
You can’t always get what you want
You can’t always get what you want
But if you try sometimes, you might find you get what you need.
Unfortunately the last budget was neither what we wanted nor what we needed.
But from last year:
...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
The issue, as is often the case, is that they are more political than archaeological. if we give them up, in the eyes of many, we lose a little bit of prestige and power. And likewise, the Greeks want them, in part (*), because they have become a symbol.
If this was not the case, one or either could just do with casts.
Therefore any 'solution' has to be one that allows both sides to preserve, and give, a little face.
(*) Or parts...
ElginParthenon marbles.Much has been written about Labour’s tactics since the election taking on a similar tone to those Cameron, Clegg and Osborne employed against Labour back in 2010. I.e - spend the first few months talking about how much of a mess you inherited, dine out on it down the line. Labour might still be able to do this, but I think the circumstances were different this year and they fought the last battle.
Everyone knew the Tories made a mess of things. What people were after was probably less of the doom and gloom and more of the why and how to fix it. I think people were looking for solutions. What instead we have are very sober, mournful dialogues from Starmer about how bad everything is and how it will take time to fix. But I think the issue this time is that they are being charged with talking the country down and actively pursuing policies that won’t make things better. That is the problem.
Notably a plurality of Reform voters wish to keep the marbles in the UK and nearly half of Tories wish to keep them in the British Museum too
If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have to find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.
Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.
Karma
I wish yougov could devise an IQ test as part of their next opinion poll question....
I simply don’t believe 23% of the population have ever been to the British museum.
No idea why we have this debate every few years.
So you wouldn't even need as many as 500,000 first-time British visitors a year.
Some perfect copies are made of the marbles. Half are sent back to Greece, we keep the other half. Every two or three years, we cycle them, with them giving us half of their real ones, and we give them half of our real ones. Neither country 'owns' them; we share them.
In conjunction with this, a VR experience is created, a little like the excellent MAV museum at Herculaneum (*), allowing people to view what they are like, and would have been like. This is maintained between ourselves and Greece. This is available in person (if we want), or online via VR. This will allow viewers to see them in context; which neither Greece or we will do.
(*): https://www.museomav.it/museum/?lang=en
And where do you find marble? In a geological museum - which merged with the Nat Hist M [edit] next door some years back but was always accessible by internal corridor from it and is otherwise physically still there ...
It's not that different to Argentina continuing to press about the Falklands, though probably with less success there (partly because of their weird framing of the issue as though it were not a matter of imperial lines on maps arguing).
(And as for gilt yields, we used to hear updates every five minutes on here from the PB Tories. They have become strangely silent on the matter in recent weeks).
The tests facing Starmer are the May 25 locals, the May 26 Scottish and Welsh devolved elections, and then the next election is very much coming into focus
His problem is the terrible budget and I have said previously that my budget would have been very much pro business and growth
Increase taxes to 25% and eliminate NI for all those working
Increase tax allowance to £15,000
Abolish triple lock and change to inflation plus 1%
Reduce corporation tax to 20%
Increase council tax bands
Increase fuel duty
Some form of wealth tax
This doesn't of course mean that they are legally ours, and even if they are I'd have thought it was about time they were handed back, if only as a gesture of goodwill to a friendly democratic nation. The only reason for hesitation would be the matter of encouraging a zillion other claims, mostly spurious too.
Maybe leaseback makes sense.
* Yes, I know I could Google this, but I generally find asking PB is quicker and more accurate.