Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Losing your marbles – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,212
edited December 17 in General
Losing your marbles – politicalbetting.com

Ahead of the Greek PM's visit to the UK tomorrow, most Britons think the Elgin Marbles should be returned to GreeceReturn to Greece: 53%Keep in Britain: 24%https://t.co/JRQedtTVfi pic.twitter.com/SOshhXJA5Z

Read the full story here

«13456

Comments

  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,172
    Take copies first.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,220
    I'm happy for the Marbles (and anything else for that matter) to be returned. But they weren't stolen, they were rescued.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,857
    edited December 2
    Take copies, and a backup second. Yes, time to discuss and organise return.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,172
    algarkirk said:

    Take copies, and a backup second.

    If they're good enough, no one need know whether we returned the originals...
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,682
    Did Elgin buy them? If so the nation should be compensated.

    But yes, there is a reasonable case that they should go back to Greece.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,682
    algarkirk said:

    Take copies, and a backup second. Yes, time to discuss and organise return.

    We have the technology to make perfect copies now. It’s like dinosaur fossils. How many people visit museums and are deceived by copies of fossils?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,172
    This is the correct response from Democratic politicians.

    As a father, I get it. But as someone who wants people to believe in public service again, it’s a setback.
    https://x.com/RepGregLandsman/status/1863591569363804388
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,496
    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled
  • mwadamsmwadams Posts: 3,668
    Entirely agree. Hi res copies, return the originals, agreement on academic access, and tell the story. Best of all worlds.
  • Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,471
    According to many on here, Starmer has already lost his marbles.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,496

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    Not true. It’s actually up to MPs - you need an act of parliament to give away any of the BM’s collection AIUI
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,220

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    Putting Osborne out of work seems the main incentive to return the boring rubbish.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,172
    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,632
    We have no business with another country's marbles. It's that simple for me.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,807
    Fpt.

    ...

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    *Apparently* there were US air strikes against Iranian-backed militia in eastern Syria last night.

    Not seeing this reported anywhere sane, but it was on Twix.

    Yes, I saw that, but hesitated to post it without confirmation.
    The source was a pretty regular Syrian conflict reporter, FWIW.
    If true, that means Russia and the USA are on the same side?!?
    No. Both Russia and Iran back Assad (though I would not be surprised if Iran was sponsoring other groups as well.)
    Thankyou. It’s so incredibly complex

    I’ve seen some hideous evidence that these rebels - or some of them - are easily as bad as isis. Islamist maniacs who will impose brutal sharia law a la Taliban

    Which leaves me in the impossibly horrible position of maybe hoping Assad prevails
    Initial reports on the ground from Aleppo suggest not.
    But then again, similar claims of reasonableness were actually made for ISIS in the very early days.
    There are, I am afraid, grotesque videos. I don’t think they are fake

    This is probably ISIS 2.0 and I reckon anyone hoping for the rebels to be good guys are like those who hoped the new Taliban would be more reasonable. That’s the Taliban who have just made it illegal for women to speak
    I'm not expecting good guys.
    Just hoping for something slightly better than Assad. We'll see.
    We have already seen what rebel controlled Aleppo was like, hence the joyous Christmas celebrations when they fucked off. These will obviously be exactly the same for their bloody and hopefully short reign, and as I said to Tim the other day, if you found yourself in a no man's land between SAA held territory and rebel held Aleppo, you'd run screaming into the former to protect you, so I think the citizens of Aleppo would probably tell you where you could file your 'hopes', especially if they have the misfortune to be Christian, Druze, Alawite, female, or anything apart from an Islamist nutter.
    You're missing out some important steps.

    City under Assad's control: death to anyone who dares disagree with him.
    City under IS control: death to anyone who dare disagree with them.

    Most of the population, as in France during WW2, just buckle down and try to make the best of what they can, without popping their heads above the parapet. Some of these rebel groups - especially the Kurds - may well be 'better' than both those options.

    But don't make the mistake of believing Assad is anything other than a mass-murdering shit.
    No. The Assad regime cracks down on ruthlessly on attempts to undermine it. The Islamists crack down ruthlessly on others for existing. The two can't even be compared.

    It is especially galling to see those who have more than a passing sympathy with woke ideals be so glib about the passing of authority from a tolerant society to an Islamist one. That's clearly how far your espousal of feminist values goes.
    You think Assad was 'tolerant' ?

    You care so much about people that you spread Putin's lies about MH17, however contradictory that latest lie was. If I'm 'woke', then at least I'm at peace that I'm not a stupid shill for a fascist, imperialist regime.
    My point is that you're not woke - if your wokeness was anything more than an empty hypocritical pose, you wouldn't be cheerleading the unseating of a dictator who has preserved religious and ethnic tolerance, in favour of a theocratic Islamist regime that will strip the rights of women to wear what they wish, communicate with whom they wish, and be educated and get a job if they so wish.
  • Carnyx said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
    Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,378
    I don't care about the rights and wrongs.What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330

    algarkirk said:

    Take copies, and a backup second. Yes, time to discuss and organise return.

    We have the technology to make perfect copies now. It’s like dinosaur fossils. How many people visit museums and are deceived by copies of fossils?
    Physically? For heavy, porous stone? Very difficult, probably impossible, without doing some damage, even if most of us wouldn't notice. Just think of the mould release agent soaking into the marble.

    But laser raster scanning or photogrammetry ...
    https://www.3d-fossils.ac.uk/home.html
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,807
    I think I'd be fine with loaning them back, providing the Greeks give something of equal value as security. They keep the marbles, the forfeit with other thing.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,505
    edited December 2
    LOL....it looks as shit as the ad. Rather sadly I think they are going to be be busto aren't they.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/12/02/jaguar-barbie-pink-concept-electric-car-leaked-online/
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330

    Carnyx said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
    Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
    Ah yes, that. No need for anyone to skirt around the ownership issue. But would it be good enough for the capital of philosophy?
  • I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it
  • viewcode said:

    I don't care about the rights and wrongs.What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.

    Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,895
    Carnyx said:

    algarkirk said:

    Take copies, and a backup second. Yes, time to discuss and organise return.

    We have the technology to make perfect copies now. It’s like dinosaur fossils. How many people visit museums and are deceived by copies of fossils?
    Physically? For heavy, porous stone? Very difficult, probably impossible, without doing some damage, even if most of us wouldn't notice. Just think of the mould release agent soaking into the marble.

    But laser raster scanning or photogrammetry ...
    https://www.3d-fossils.ac.uk/home.html
    Sure, but then you can 3d print the mould and make a replica with more fidelity than doing so physically.
  • I think I'd be fine with loaning them back, providing the Greeks give something of equal value as security. They keep the marbles, the forfeit with other thing.

    I’d want the Acropolis and have it installed in the North.

    Levelling up and all that jazz.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330

    viewcode said:

    I don't care about the rights and wrongs.What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.

    Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
    The late Duke of Edinburgh was pretty Greek the last I heard.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792
    I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,433

    Fpt.

    ...

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    *Apparently* there were US air strikes against Iranian-backed militia in eastern Syria last night.

    Not seeing this reported anywhere sane, but it was on Twix.

    Yes, I saw that, but hesitated to post it without confirmation.
    The source was a pretty regular Syrian conflict reporter, FWIW.
    If true, that means Russia and the USA are on the same side?!?
    No. Both Russia and Iran back Assad (though I would not be surprised if Iran was sponsoring other groups as well.)
    Thankyou. It’s so incredibly complex

    I’ve seen some hideous evidence that these rebels - or some of them - are easily as bad as isis. Islamist maniacs who will impose brutal sharia law a la Taliban

    Which leaves me in the impossibly horrible position of maybe hoping Assad prevails
    Initial reports on the ground from Aleppo suggest not.
    But then again, similar claims of reasonableness were actually made for ISIS in the very early days.
    There are, I am afraid, grotesque videos. I don’t think they are fake

    This is probably ISIS 2.0 and I reckon anyone hoping for the rebels to be good guys are like those who hoped the new Taliban would be more reasonable. That’s the Taliban who have just made it illegal for women to speak
    I'm not expecting good guys.
    Just hoping for something slightly better than Assad. We'll see.
    We have already seen what rebel controlled Aleppo was like, hence the joyous Christmas celebrations when they fucked off. These will obviously be exactly the same for their bloody and hopefully short reign, and as I said to Tim the other day, if you found yourself in a no man's land between SAA held territory and rebel held Aleppo, you'd run screaming into the former to protect you, so I think the citizens of Aleppo would probably tell you where you could file your 'hopes', especially if they have the misfortune to be Christian, Druze, Alawite, female, or anything apart from an Islamist nutter.
    You're missing out some important steps.

    City under Assad's control: death to anyone who dares disagree with him.
    City under IS control: death to anyone who dare disagree with them.

    Most of the population, as in France during WW2, just buckle down and try to make the best of what they can, without popping their heads above the parapet. Some of these rebel groups - especially the Kurds - may well be 'better' than both those options.

    But don't make the mistake of believing Assad is anything other than a mass-murdering shit.
    No. The Assad regime cracks down on ruthlessly on attempts to undermine it. The Islamists crack down ruthlessly on others for existing. The two can't even be compared.

    It is especially galling to see those who have more than a passing sympathy with woke ideals be so glib about the passing of authority from a tolerant society to an Islamist one. That's clearly how far your espousal of feminist values goes.
    You think Assad was 'tolerant' ?

    You care so much about people that you spread Putin's lies about MH17, however contradictory that latest lie was. If I'm 'woke', then at least I'm at peace that I'm not a stupid shill for a fascist, imperialist regime.
    My point is that you're not woke - if your wokeness was anything more than an empty hypocritical pose, you wouldn't be cheerleading the unseating of a dictator who has preserved religious and ethnic tolerance, in favour of a theocratic Islamist regime that will strip the rights of women to wear what they wish, communicate with whom they wish, and be educated and get a job if they so wish.
    And my point is that you're a repeated shill for an evil regime.

    Also, you have changed your view from 'tolerance' to 'religious and ethnic tolerance' - and the latter is very debatable - just ask the Kurds.

    I'm not 'cheerleading' the unseating of Assad. I'm saying that, unlike you and HYUFD, I don't see him as the future of Syria, because his enormous crimes are similar to those of his 'enemies'. Whereas you, as ever, cheer-lead for Russia and Putin.

    Well done, comrade!
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,172

    Fpt.

    ...

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    *Apparently* there were US air strikes against Iranian-backed militia in eastern Syria last night.

    Not seeing this reported anywhere sane, but it was on Twix.

    Yes, I saw that, but hesitated to post it without confirmation.
    The source was a pretty regular Syrian conflict reporter, FWIW.
    If true, that means Russia and the USA are on the same side?!?
    No. Both Russia and Iran back Assad (though I would not be surprised if Iran was sponsoring other groups as well.)
    Thankyou. It’s so incredibly complex

    I’ve seen some hideous evidence that these rebels - or some of them - are easily as bad as isis. Islamist maniacs who will impose brutal sharia law a la Taliban

    Which leaves me in the impossibly horrible position of maybe hoping Assad prevails
    Initial reports on the ground from Aleppo suggest not.
    But then again, similar claims of reasonableness were actually made for ISIS in the very early days.
    There are, I am afraid, grotesque videos. I don’t think they are fake

    This is probably ISIS 2.0 and I reckon anyone hoping for the rebels to be good guys are like those who hoped the new Taliban would be more reasonable. That’s the Taliban who have just made it illegal for women to speak
    I'm not expecting good guys.
    Just hoping for something slightly better than Assad. We'll see.
    We have already seen what rebel controlled Aleppo was like, hence the joyous Christmas celebrations when they fucked off. These will obviously be exactly the same for their bloody and hopefully short reign, and as I said to Tim the other day, if you found yourself in a no man's land between SAA held territory and rebel held Aleppo, you'd run screaming into the former to protect you, so I think the citizens of Aleppo would probably tell you where you could file your 'hopes', especially if they have the misfortune to be Christian, Druze, Alawite, female, or anything apart from an Islamist nutter.
    You're missing out some important steps.

    City under Assad's control: death to anyone who dares disagree with him.
    City under IS control: death to anyone who dare disagree with them.

    Most of the population, as in France during WW2, just buckle down and try to make the best of what they can, without popping their heads above the parapet. Some of these rebel groups - especially the Kurds - may well be 'better' than both those options.

    But don't make the mistake of believing Assad is anything other than a mass-murdering shit.
    No. The Assad regime cracks down on ruthlessly on attempts to undermine it. The Islamists crack down ruthlessly on others for existing. The two can't even be compared.

    It is especially galling to see those who have more than a passing sympathy with woke ideals be so glib about the passing of authority from a tolerant society to an Islamist one. That's clearly how far your espousal of feminist values goes.
    You think Assad was 'tolerant' ?

    You care so much about people that you spread Putin's lies about MH17, however contradictory that latest lie was. If I'm 'woke', then at least I'm at peace that I'm not a stupid shill for a fascist, imperialist regime.
    My point is that you're not woke - if your wokeness was anything more than an empty hypocritical pose, you wouldn't be cheerleading the unseating of a dictator who has preserved religious and ethnic tolerance, in favour of a theocratic Islamist regime that will strip the rights of women to wear what they wish, communicate with whom they wish, and be educated and get a job if they so wish.
    Your point is that we should accept you're a Syria expert.
    In reality, none of us are.

    Nut to pretend Assad is anything but a mass murderer, who has used chemical weapons multiple times on civilian targets, is just pitiful stuff.
  • tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    Putting Osborne out of work seems the main incentive to return the boring rubbish.
    He’s got about thirty jobs, losing one won’t impact him that much, plus it is the Robey Warshaw that’s quite impressive.

    George Osborne collects share of £30m after record profits at City advisory firm

    Ex-chancellor one of three partners to share sum at Robey Warshaw, co-founded by ‘trillion-dollar man’ Simon Robey


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/nov/28/george-osborne-collects-share-of-30m-after-record-profits-at-city-advisory-firm
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330

    Carnyx said:

    algarkirk said:

    Take copies, and a backup second. Yes, time to discuss and organise return.

    We have the technology to make perfect copies now. It’s like dinosaur fossils. How many people visit museums and are deceived by copies of fossils?
    Physically? For heavy, porous stone? Very difficult, probably impossible, without doing some damage, even if most of us wouldn't notice. Just think of the mould release agent soaking into the marble.

    But laser raster scanning or photogrammetry ...
    https://www.3d-fossils.ac.uk/home.html
    Sure, but then you can 3d print the mould and make a replica with more fidelity than doing so physically.
    Or just 3d print the actual replica. No need to mould it, unless I suppose the 3d printed materials don't last.

    The Greeks are still upset about the time the BM took wire brushes to the Marbles, and ISTR that was a century or so ago.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514
    WE should make copies and return them to Turkey.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,433
    Intel's CEO has unexpectedly retired with immediate effect, and stood down from the board.

    So, it is either health, family, or defenestration (not literal...)

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/dec/02/intel-ceo-pat-gelsinger
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,632
    Nigelb said:

    This is the correct response from Democratic politicians.

    As a father, I get it. But as someone who wants people to believe in public service again, it’s a setback.
    https://x.com/RepGregLandsman/status/1863591569363804388

    I think I'd agree. The decision is understandable but wrong. You - if you're a Dem - have to say both those things. If you omit the understandable you look like you're lacking in common empathy for a good man and doing Trump's work for him. If you omit wrong you're giving away too much moral high ground and contributing to the slide away from civilised norms, which also helps Trump.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,378

    viewcode said:

    I don't care about the rights and wrongs. What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.

    Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
    No, but I wouldn't be asking them nicely. It's all part and parcel of the "who does the state act for", which seems to be an underlying theme of mine. The State should act for the country and the people within it, and if that means being unfair to another country, that is not a problem. We are losing sight of what the nation state should do and its purpose.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,682

    I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    All governments inherit legacies from their predecessors. Cameron in 2010 inherited after the crash of 2008. He could also point to Browns failures to follow sound fiscal rules over his time as CoE, and the profligacy of the public private investment model, which in many case we are still paying for today. Blair could rightly point to decades of underinvestment under the Tories when he came to power.

    Yes Starmer has inherited a mess. Not all of the Tories making, for sure, Covid and Ukraine have buggered many incumbent governments. But there is a lot else wrong in the country too. The NHS waiting lists have grown, despite more money. There seems to be a clear correlation between Labour, the Tories and the direction of travel for waiting lists in the NHS.

    I’m no economist, but I do at least understand that a nations finances is not the same as an individuals. But we pay so much in interest that you have to wonder.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,433

    WE should make copies and return them to Turkey.

    The Turks are the one who blew up the Parthenon in the first place...

    "After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenon

    "The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_the_Acropolis_(1687)
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,012

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    Putting Osborne out of work seems the main incentive to return the boring rubbish.
    He’s got about thirty jobs, losing one won’t impact him that much, plus it is the Robey Warshaw that’s quite impressive.

    George Osborne collects share of £30m after record profits at City advisory firm

    Ex-chancellor one of three partners to share sum at Robey Warshaw, co-founded by ‘trillion-dollar man’ Simon Robey


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/nov/28/george-osborne-collects-share-of-30m-after-record-profits-at-city-advisory-firm
    And UK plc were getting him for about £150k a year. Big mistake, Mrs May, big mistake.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,514

    WE should make copies and return them to Turkey.

    The Turks are the one who blew up the Parthenon in the first place...

    "After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenon

    "The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_the_Acropolis_(1687)
    And look at the centuries of fun they have given us.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330
    edited December 2

    I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.

    Pausanias is your friend:

    ὁπόσα ἐν τοῖς καλουμένοις ἀετοῖς κεῖται, πάντα ἐς τὴν Ἀθηνᾶς ἔχει γένεσιν, τὰ δὲ ὄπισθεν ἡ Ποσειδῶνος πρὸς Ἀθηνᾶν ἐστιν ἔρις ὑπὲρ τῆς γῆς: αὐτὸ δὲ ἔκ τε ἐλέφαντος τὸ ἄγαλμα καὶ χρησμοῦ πεποίηται. μέσῳ μὲν οὖν ἐπίκειταί οἱ τῷ κράνει Σφιγγὸς εἰκών—ἃ δὲ ἐς τὴν Σφίγγα λέγεται, γράψω προελθόντος ἐς τὰ Βοιώτιά μοι τοῦ λόγου—, καθ᾽ ἑκάτερον δὲ τοῦ κράνους γρῦπές εἰσιν ἐπειργασμένοι.

    Actual guidebook from millennia ago.
  • Carnyx said:

    viewcode said:

    I don't care about the rights and wrongs.What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.

    Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
    The late Duke of Edinburgh was pretty Greek the last I heard.
    As a former councillor colleague was fond of saying, "He was no more Greek than you or I - he was a Kraut, like all the rest of 'em"
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,442

    I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.

    Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.

    It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,433
    mwadams said:

    Entirely agree. Hi res copies, return the originals, agreement on academic access, and tell the story. Best of all worlds.

    Pretty much like Trajan's Column cast in the BM. Though that really deserves being whole, as opposed to in halves, with platforms to allow you to see closer at the various levels. Something they cannot really do with the original.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,632

    I think I'd be fine with loaning them back, providing the Greeks give something of equal value as security. They keep the marbles, the forfeit with other thing.

    That's very creative and "transactional", I must say.

    Have the Greeks got anything stolen from us to use though?
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,561
    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 51,082

    viewcode said:

    I don't care about the rights and wrongs.What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.

    Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
    Serpent Column?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,433

    WE should make copies and return them to Turkey.

    The Turks are the one who blew up the Parthenon in the first place...

    "After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenon

    "The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_the_Acropolis_(1687)
    And look at the centuries of fun they have given us.
    Not centuries, please. Mrs J has given me twenty years of fun and pleasure. Nearly to the day... ;)
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,471

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    Putting Osborne out of work seems the main incentive to return the boring rubbish.
    He’s got about thirty jobs, losing one won’t impact him that much, plus it is the Robey Warshaw that’s quite impressive.

    George Osborne collects share of £30m after record profits at City advisory firm

    Ex-chancellor one of three partners to share sum at Robey Warshaw, co-founded by ‘trillion-dollar man’ Simon Robey


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/nov/28/george-osborne-collects-share-of-30m-after-record-profits-at-city-advisory-firm
    Poor George. Just imagine how big the profits, and his share, would be if we didn't have a socialist Labour government. It's a struggle for the rich.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330

    WE should make copies and return them to Turkey.

    The Turks are the one who blew up the Parthenon in the first place...

    "After the Ottoman conquest in the mid-15th century, it became a mosque. In the Morean War, a Venetian bomb landed on the Parthenon, which the Ottomans had used as a munitions dump, during the 1687 siege of the Acropolis. The resulting explosion severely damaged the Parthenon. "

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parthenon

    "The Turks used the temple for ammunition storage, and when, on the evening of 26 September 1687, a mortar shell hit the building, the resulting explosion killed 300 people and led to the complete destruction of the temple's roof and most of the walls."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_the_Acropolis_(1687)
    And look at the centuries of fun they have given us.
    Not centuries, please. Mrs J has given me twenty years of fun and pleasure. Nearly to the day... ;)
    Also somewhat surprised by the insistence on blaming the Turks, but not the Italians.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,807
    Nigelb said:

    Fpt.

    ...

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Nigelb said:

    *Apparently* there were US air strikes against Iranian-backed militia in eastern Syria last night.

    Not seeing this reported anywhere sane, but it was on Twix.

    Yes, I saw that, but hesitated to post it without confirmation.
    The source was a pretty regular Syrian conflict reporter, FWIW.
    If true, that means Russia and the USA are on the same side?!?
    No. Both Russia and Iran back Assad (though I would not be surprised if Iran was sponsoring other groups as well.)
    Thankyou. It’s so incredibly complex

    I’ve seen some hideous evidence that these rebels - or some of them - are easily as bad as isis. Islamist maniacs who will impose brutal sharia law a la Taliban

    Which leaves me in the impossibly horrible position of maybe hoping Assad prevails
    Initial reports on the ground from Aleppo suggest not.
    But then again, similar claims of reasonableness were actually made for ISIS in the very early days.
    There are, I am afraid, grotesque videos. I don’t think they are fake

    This is probably ISIS 2.0 and I reckon anyone hoping for the rebels to be good guys are like those who hoped the new Taliban would be more reasonable. That’s the Taliban who have just made it illegal for women to speak
    I'm not expecting good guys.
    Just hoping for something slightly better than Assad. We'll see.
    We have already seen what rebel controlled Aleppo was like, hence the joyous Christmas celebrations when they fucked off. These will obviously be exactly the same for their bloody and hopefully short reign, and as I said to Tim the other day, if you found yourself in a no man's land between SAA held territory and rebel held Aleppo, you'd run screaming into the former to protect you, so I think the citizens of Aleppo would probably tell you where you could file your 'hopes', especially if they have the misfortune to be Christian, Druze, Alawite, female, or anything apart from an Islamist nutter.
    You're missing out some important steps.

    City under Assad's control: death to anyone who dares disagree with him.
    City under IS control: death to anyone who dare disagree with them.

    Most of the population, as in France during WW2, just buckle down and try to make the best of what they can, without popping their heads above the parapet. Some of these rebel groups - especially the Kurds - may well be 'better' than both those options.

    But don't make the mistake of believing Assad is anything other than a mass-murdering shit.
    No. The Assad regime cracks down on ruthlessly on attempts to undermine it. The Islamists crack down ruthlessly on others for existing. The two can't even be compared.

    It is especially galling to see those who have more than a passing sympathy with woke ideals be so glib about the passing of authority from a tolerant society to an Islamist one. That's clearly how far your espousal of feminist values goes.
    You think Assad was 'tolerant' ?

    You care so much about people that you spread Putin's lies about MH17, however contradictory that latest lie was. If I'm 'woke', then at least I'm at peace that I'm not a stupid shill for a fascist, imperialist regime.
    My point is that you're not woke - if your wokeness was anything more than an empty hypocritical pose, you wouldn't be cheerleading the unseating of a dictator who has preserved religious and ethnic tolerance, in favour of a theocratic Islamist regime that will strip the rights of women to wear what they wish, communicate with whom they wish, and be educated and get a job if they so wish.
    Your point is that we should accept you're a Syria expert.
    In reality, none of us are.

    Nut to pretend Assad is anything but a mass murderer, who has used chemical weapons multiple times on civilian targets, is just pitiful stuff.
    No, that's absolutely not my point, I am absolutely *not* an expert, I am stating simple facts, acknowledged by most here, unless they're policing 'PB morale'.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,012

    I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.

    Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.

    It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
    Or as Mick put it
    You can’t always get what you want
    You can’t always get what you want
    But if you try sometimes, you might find you get what you need.

    Unfortunately the last budget was neither what we wanted nor what we needed.
  • I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.

    Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.

    It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
    I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,172

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    I suspect that The Man on the Clapham Omnibus has never heard of them, still less looked at them.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,433

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    I have, and frankly found them underwhelming. Unlike (say) Trajan's column, or the fascinating Rosetta Stone.

    The issue, as is often the case, is that they are more political than archaeological. if we give them up, in the eyes of many, we lose a little bit of prestige and power. And likewise, the Greeks want them, in part (*), because they have become a symbol.

    If this was not the case, one or either could just do with casts.

    Therefore any 'solution' has to be one that allows both sides to preserve, and give, a little face.

    (*) Or parts...
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,682

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    I suspect that The Man on the Clapham Omnibus has never heard of them, still less looked at them.
    Rubbish, everyone has heard of the Elgin Parthenon marbles.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    I suspect that The Man on the Clapham Omnibus has never heard of them, still less looked at them.
    Oh, they do hear about them when the usual suspects kick up a stink in the DM about their possible return.

  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,632
    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    I don't care about the rights and wrongs. What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.

    Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
    No, but I wouldn't be asking them nicely. It's all part and parcel of the "who does the state act for", which seems to be an underlying theme of mine. The State should act for the country and the people within it, and if that means being unfair to another country, that is not a problem. We are losing sight of what the nation state should do and its purpose.
    But hang on. I'm British and I'd feel better with those Marbles back in Greece and most Brits agree with me. So under that principle of the State acting exclusively for its own people (which I don't really agree with but let's go with it for the sake of argument) shouldn't they be returned?
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,471
    kinabalu said:

    I think I'd be fine with loaning them back, providing the Greeks give something of equal value as security. They keep the marbles, the forfeit with other thing.

    That's very creative and "transactional", I must say.

    Have the Greeks got anything stolen from us to use though?
    Obviously the 2004 Euros, which Greece won when it should have been ours, as ever.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,916

    I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    All governments inherit legacies from their predecessors. Cameron in 2010 inherited after the crash of 2008. He could also point to Browns failures to follow sound fiscal rules over his time as CoE, and the profligacy of the public private investment model, which in many case we are still paying for today. Blair could rightly point to decades of underinvestment under the Tories when he came to power.

    Yes Starmer has inherited a mess. Not all of the Tories making, for sure, Covid and Ukraine have buggered many incumbent governments. But there is a lot else wrong in the country too. The NHS waiting lists have grown, despite more money. There seems to be a clear correlation between Labour, the Tories and the direction of travel for waiting lists in the NHS.

    I’m no economist, but I do at least understand that a nations finances is not the same as an individuals. But we pay so much in interest that you have to wonder.
    I think Starmer’s problem partly stems from laying it on a bit thick, and not being a particularly charismatic salesman.

    Much has been written about Labour’s tactics since the election taking on a similar tone to those Cameron, Clegg and Osborne employed against Labour back in 2010. I.e - spend the first few months talking about how much of a mess you inherited, dine out on it down the line. Labour might still be able to do this, but I think the circumstances were different this year and they fought the last battle.

    Everyone knew the Tories made a mess of things. What people were after was probably less of the doom and gloom and more of the why and how to fix it. I think people were looking for solutions. What instead we have are very sober, mournful dialogues from Starmer about how bad everything is and how it will take time to fix. But I think the issue this time is that they are being charged with talking the country down and actively pursuing policies that won’t make things better. That is the problem.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,012

    Carnyx said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
    Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
    How much a year does the government propose to pay this time?
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330
    DavidL said:

    Carnyx said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
    Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
    How much a year does the government propose to pay this time?
    Leasehold tenure? Feu duty?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,012
    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
    The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,012
    Carnyx said:

    DavidL said:

    Carnyx said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    But Parliament does have to change the relevant legislation. So back to Westminster. Maybe a Private Member's Bill? But no, someone is bound to talk it out.
    Isn’t the workaround we give the marbles to Greece on loan for 999 years so no act is required?
    How much a year does the government propose to pay this time?
    Leasehold tenure? Feu duty?
    I think this government thinks that it is on the side of the tenant so they assume that they have to pay.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,378
    kinabalu said:

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    I don't care about the rights and wrongs. What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.

    Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
    No, but I wouldn't be asking them nicely. It's all part and parcel of the "who does the state act for", which seems to be an underlying theme of mine. The State should act for the country and the people within it, and if that means being unfair to another country, that is not a problem. We are losing sight of what the nation state should do and its purpose.
    But hang on. I'm British and I'd feel better with those Marbles back in Greece and most Brits agree with me. So under that principle of the State acting exclusively for its own people (which I don't really agree with but let's go with it for the sake of argument) shouldn't they be returned?
    No.

    :):):):)
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    I suspect that The Man on the Clapham Omnibus has never heard of them, still less looked at them.
    Rubbish, everyone has heard of the Elgin Parthenon marbles.
    Maybe. But as ever with these matters, it is easy to overestimate the public consciousness for such things.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,864
    edited December 2
    We can return them on loan but if national museums are only allowed to keep objects from their nation permanently there would be few objects left in them.

    Notably a plurality of Reform voters wish to keep the marbles in the UK and nearly half of Tories wish to keep them in the British Museum too
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,916
    edited December 2
    If Michel Barnier has to resign, at least he can comfort himself that he’s probably going to last about 2 Liz Trusses.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330
    DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
    The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
    Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,632
    viewcode said:

    kinabalu said:

    viewcode said:

    viewcode said:

    I don't care about the rights and wrongs. What we have we hold. Just say "no" to the Greeks.

    Would you feel the same way if the Greeks/Ottomans had ‘acquired’ the Crown Jewels in the same way?
    No, but I wouldn't be asking them nicely. It's all part and parcel of the "who does the state act for", which seems to be an underlying theme of mine. The State should act for the country and the people within it, and if that means being unfair to another country, that is not a problem. We are losing sight of what the nation state should do and its purpose.
    But hang on. I'm British and I'd feel better with those Marbles back in Greece and most Brits agree with me. So under that principle of the State acting exclusively for its own people (which I don't really agree with but let's go with it for the sake of argument) shouldn't they be returned?
    No.

    :):):):)
    Ha, got you there, haven't I. PB's top brainbox flummoxed.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,471
    HYUFD said:

    We can return them on loan but if national museums are only allowed to keep objects from their nation permanently there would be few objects left in them.

    Notably a plurality of Reform voters wish to keep the marbles in the UK and nearly half of Tories wish to keep them in the British Museum too

    Also notably, and coincidentally, a plurality of Reform voters know nothing whatsoever about the marbles or their origin.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,161
    "Three people have died and at least 32 were hospitalised in the Philippines after eating an endangered sea turtle cooked in stew."

    Karma
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,012

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    Putting Osborne out of work seems the main incentive to return the boring rubbish.
    He’s got about thirty jobs, losing one won’t impact him that much, plus it is the Robey Warshaw that’s quite impressive.

    George Osborne collects share of £30m after record profits at City advisory firm

    Ex-chancellor one of three partners to share sum at Robey Warshaw, co-founded by ‘trillion-dollar man’ Simon Robey


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/nov/28/george-osborne-collects-share-of-30m-after-record-profits-at-city-advisory-firm
    Poor George. Just imagine how big the profits, and his share, would be if we didn't have a socialist Labour government. It's a struggle for the rich.
    I’m not entirely sure “poor “ is the right adjective.
  • Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 3,944

    HYUFD said:

    We can return them on loan but if national museums are only allowed to keep objects from their nation permanently there would be few objects left in them.

    Notably a plurality of Reform voters wish to keep the marbles in the UK and nearly half of Tories wish to keep them in the British Museum too

    Also notably, and coincidentally, a plurality of Reform voters know nothing whatsoever about the marbles or their origin.
    Surprise surprise.

    I wish yougov could devise an IQ test as part of their next opinion poll question....
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,682
    edited December 2

    I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.

    Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.

    It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
    I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect

    We'll see.

    If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.

    Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.

    2010-2015 is a generation away? Perhaps in Scotland.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,012
    Carnyx said:

    DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
    The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
    Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
    There should be a few test questions such as what colour are they? How long are they? What are they made of?

    I simply don’t believe 23% of the population have ever been to the British museum.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,945
    In theory, returning the marbles is a good idea. Not sure about whether it would be in practice.
  • LennonLennon Posts: 1,782
    Carnyx said:

    DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
    The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
    Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
    Is there any information on how many of that 23% fall into the category of 'I was dragged there on a school trip' rather than a genuine interest in seeing them as an adult?
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,668

    I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.

    Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.

    It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
    I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect

    We'll see.

    If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.

    Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.

    2010-2015 is a generation away? Perhaps in Scotland.

    Coalitions are inherently unstable because they involve keeping at least two parties happy. But point taken. I certainly think that events since 2015 have clouded many a memory.

  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,114
    DavidL said:

    tlg86 said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    It’s not his call.

    It’s down to the British Museum led by that fine patriot George Osborne.
    Putting Osborne out of work seems the main incentive to return the boring rubbish.
    He’s got about thirty jobs, losing one won’t impact him that much, plus it is the Robey Warshaw that’s quite impressive.

    George Osborne collects share of £30m after record profits at City advisory firm

    Ex-chancellor one of three partners to share sum at Robey Warshaw, co-founded by ‘trillion-dollar man’ Simon Robey


    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/nov/28/george-osborne-collects-share-of-30m-after-record-profits-at-city-advisory-firm
    Poor George. Just imagine how big the profits, and his share, would be if we didn't have a socialist Labour government. It's a struggle for the rich.
    I’m not entirely sure “poor “ is the right adjective.
    How much farmland is he going to buy?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,114

    I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.

    I certainly couldn't give a monkey's either.

    No idea why we have this debate every few years.

  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,895
    edited December 2
    DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
    The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
    The British Museum had nearly six million visitors last year. Now, sure, large numbers will be foreign tourists, and repeat visitors, but half a million first-time British visitors a year is possible. Would add up to 15 million in 30 years.

    So you wouldn't even need as many as 500,000 first-time British visitors a year.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,433
    So here is a 'solution' that seems reasonable to me, and is therefore impossible to happen.

    Some perfect copies are made of the marbles. Half are sent back to Greece, we keep the other half. Every two or three years, we cycle them, with them giving us half of their real ones, and we give them half of our real ones. Neither country 'owns' them; we share them.

    In conjunction with this, a VR experience is created, a little like the excellent MAV museum at Herculaneum (*), allowing people to view what they are like, and would have been like. This is maintained between ourselves and Greece. This is available in person (if we want), or online via VR. This will allow viewers to see them in context; which neither Greece or we will do.

    (*): https://www.museomav.it/museum/?lang=en
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792
    DavidL said:

    Carnyx said:

    DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
    The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
    Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
    There should be a few test questions such as what colour are they? How long are they? What are they made of?

    I simply don’t believe 23% of the population have ever been to the British museum.
    Indeed. I suspect some of that 23% think they look like the things with which one plays KerPlunk.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330
    edited December 2
    DavidL said:

    Carnyx said:

    DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
    The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
    Some of that would, to be sure, normally include a quick viewing en route to the main interest, e.g. Mr Pete Marsh/the shop/King Tut special exhibition/etc. But that's the nature of such things, and the gallery is actually on one side of the complex so we're not dealing with a through route. As you say 23% isn't bad.
    There should be a few test questions such as what colour are they? How long are they? What are they made of?

    I simply don’t believe 23% of the population have ever been to the British museum.
    One thing I do wonder about. It's not so long since the one with the dinosaurs was still called the British Museum (Natural History), historically a spinoff from [edit] the BM. Though loosely called the Natural History Museum long ago, when hippos roamed South Ken and we were young. .. ah, on checking, it was still part of the BM legally in 1963, and didn't chamge its name from BM(NH) till 1992, so if there was an official brass plate on the front ...

    And where do you find marble? In a geological museum - which merged with the Nat Hist M [edit] next door some years back but was always accessible by internal corridor from it and is otherwise physically still there ...
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,330

    DavidL said:

    Nigelb said:

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    That's a bit of a non sequitur to my comment, Nick.

    But from last year:
    ...77% of the British public have never seen the Parthenon Sculptures in the British Museum while seven out of ten say that their return to Athens would not have an impact on their interest in visiting the British Museum...
    The fact that 23% of us have is really quite astounding. Barely credible in fact.
    The British Museum had nearly six million visitors last year. Now, sure, large numbers will be foreign tourists, and repeat visitors, but half a million first-time British visitors a year is possible. Would add up to 15 million in 30 years.

    So you wouldn't even need as many as 500,000 first-time British visitors a year.
    You start running into repeats though on that timescale - mum or grandpa with the children, or on their own.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578
    tlg86 said:

    I'm happy for the Marbles (and anything else for that matter) to be returned. But they weren't stolen, they were rescued.

    Did Elgin buy them? If so the nation should be compensated.

    But yes, there is a reasonable case that they should go back to Greece.

    Simple solution, they can have them back so long as they establish as a matter of Greek law the acceptance that they were not stolen.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578

    I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.

    I certainly couldn't give a monkey's either.

    No idea why we have this debate every few years.

    And that's why eventually they will be given back, and why they keep asking. Eventually enough in the UK won't care.

    It's not that different to Argentina continuing to press about the Falklands, though probably with less success there (partly because of their weird framing of the issue as though it were not a matter of imperial lines on maps arguing).
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792

    I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.

    Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.

    It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
    I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect

    We'll see.

    If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have to find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.

    Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.

    I agree with most of your post, but not your somewhat incongruous contention that they are "terrible politicians". How many "terrible politicians" have masterminded landslides of that scale and inflicted the worst defeat on their prime opponents in history?

    (And as for gilt yields, we used to hear updates every five minutes on here from the PB Tories. They have become strangely silent on the matter in recent weeks).
  • Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 3,944
    Andy_JS said:

    In theory, returning the marbles is a good idea. Not sure about whether it would be in practice.

    I think we should return the conkers and the scrabble tiles as well...
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,442

    I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.

    Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.

    It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
    I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect

    We'll see.

    If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.

    Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.

    2010-2015 is a generation away? Perhaps in Scotland.
    Only a decade, but the sort of decade where centuries happened.
  • I have no objections to their return or even some form of compromise

    I replied to @Taz at the end of the last thread and repeat my comments here

    In all honesty I did not expect a Starmer led government to sideline a Blair style government and go left with policies that seriously undermine business in favour of unions and public sector, nor declare war on pensioners, farmers, small businesses and even increase students fees

    As I have commented previously the '14 year mantra' worked but the real problems we have today came from covid and the war in Ukraine which has seen most governments fall that were in office during that period

    There is no doubt the conservatives were out of time, and whilst I did not expect great things from Starmer his performance together with Reeves since winning the election has been abject and is reflecting in public opinion and business surveys, not least with today's announcement in the fall in consumer spending in November

    Furthermore, the IFS publicly rebuked both main parties before the election that they were not acknowledging the state of the economy, and whilst there was a deficit left to Labour nearly half of the 22 billion they repeat daily was a result from the above inflation pay rises to the doctors and train drivers

    Starmer, like Sunak, is not a politician and no matter how many relaunches he comes up with, the electorate will not change their mind on him unless and until the changes he promises become apparent and as he says he wants 10 years his problem is the electorate want to see results far quicker

    I would just say I do respect the Labour supporters on here who do acknowledge this has been an unexpected poor start and are not in denial, but hope that in time Starmer will be seen more favourable

    However, in a few weeks everything is thrown up in the air with the arrival of Trump with unforceable consequences, not just for the UK, but all around the world

    When I woke this morning to the news Biden had pardoned his son I just felt a great sense of despair for the US and integrity in politics which has all but vanished, and we will all lose from it

    This goes back to my "national hangover" thing. A lot of the problems stinking the nation out at the moment have roots going back years, and many of them are of the sort where it's pretty clear that the previous government didn't have much idea themselves how bad things were. See the huge adjustments to the immigration stats announced last week. Or the billions spent hiding migrants in hotels because the government didn't have a clue what to do with them. Or the pretence that they could get away without public sector pay rises. Et cetera.

    Yes, this government has got to show progress on lots of issues by about 4 years' time. Not complete success, but meaningful progress. But people throwing their toys out of the pram because it's not all solved in 4 months... sheesh. Some of what we're experiencing is a hangover, and hangovers aren't meant to be fun.

    It may be what the public wants. But I want doesn't get, as my dear grandmother used to say.
    I think the budget has defined Labour as one that will have a negative effect on growth, keep interest rates higher for longer, and see rises in unemployment, especially in care and hospitality as the NI increases take effect

    We'll see.

    If you want to meaningfully reduce immigration without destroying public services - and most people do - then you have to find ways of pushing UK citizens into areas like the NHS, where there are close to one million vacancies that need filling. Making it more expensive to employ low-skilled people in the private sector is one option. In fact, I can't really think of many others. Can you? What's more, we have a significant private sector productivity problem in the UK. How might you encourage that to change? Make it more expensive to hire low-skilled staff. As for interest rates, well let's see. As things stand, UK gilt yields have been falling over the last few weeks. They closed today lower than they were on 1st July.

    Starmer and Reeves are terrible politicians and they have made some terrible mistakes, but it is far, far too early to write them off. Here's a fun fact: for this Christmas and the next one and the one after that and the one after that and the one after that there will be a Labour government in office led by Sir Keir. We have forgotten completely what it is like to have that level of stability. It hasn't happened for a generation.

    Re your last paragraph the same could be said about Johnson in 2019 but we know how that turned our

    The tests facing Starmer are the May 25 locals, the May 26 Scottish and Welsh devolved elections, and then the next election is very much coming into focus

    His problem is the terrible budget and I have said previously that my budget would have been very much pro business and growth

    Increase taxes to 25% and eliminate NI for all those working

    Increase tax allowance to £15,000

    Abolish triple lock and change to inflation plus 1%

    Reduce corporation tax to 20%

    Increase council tax bands

    Increase fuel duty

    Some form of wealth tax

  • kamskikamski Posts: 5,208
    edited December 2
    kinabalu said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is the correct response from Democratic politicians.

    As a father, I get it. But as someone who wants people to believe in public service again, it’s a setback.
    https://x.com/RepGregLandsman/status/1863591569363804388

    I think I'd agree. The decision is understandable but wrong. You - if you're a Dem - have to say both those things. If you omit the understandable you look like you're lacking in common empathy for a good man and doing Trump's work for him. If you omit wrong you're giving away too much moral high ground and contributing to the slide away from civilised norms, which also helps Trump.
    kinabalu said:

    Nigelb said:

    This is the correct response from Democratic politicians.

    As a father, I get it. But as someone who wants people to believe in public service again, it’s a setback.
    https://x.com/RepGregLandsman/status/1863591569363804388

    I think I'd agree. The decision is understandable but wrong. You - if you're a Dem - have to say both those things. If you omit the understandable you look like you're lacking in common empathy for a good man and doing Trump's work for him. If you omit wrong you're giving away too much moral high ground and contributing to the slide away from civilised norms, which also helps Trump.
    I did point out in 2020 (edit) when Biden was running in the primaries that the influence-peddling by his son should have made Biden ineligible to be Democratic candidate. Now we've got this shit, which will justify a ton of pardons and antidemocratic bollocks from Trump, on top of Biden screwing up the Dem's chances of beating Trump this year. Totally predictable, and yes 'understandable'. But isn't it a few years too late for Democrats to be condemning this now?
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,442

    I suspect I am in the largest group of thought in this country: I couldn't give a monkey's either way. I did see the marbles once and wondered what all the fuss was about. It was all Greek to me.

    I certainly couldn't give a monkey's either.

    No idea why we have this debate every few years.

    Suspect it's another of those quieter majority ("they are Greek history and we wouldn't do what Lord Elgin did nowadays") against a louder minority ("they belong to us now") things.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578

    Nigelb said:

    Leon said:

    Oh god. Starmer’s gonna do it. Isn’t he. Like the Chagos

    And once the principle is established the entire British Museum will be dispersed and dismantled

    In the context of a Trump presidency, Chagos ought to be chucked back at him when he says we're not pulling our weight.
    Make a virtue of a poor deal.
    What proportion of the population have looked at the Marbles?
    I have, and frankly found them underwhelming. Unlike (say) Trajan's column, or the fascinating Rosetta Stone.

    The issue, as is often the case, is that they are more political than archaeological. if we give them up, in the eyes of many, we lose a little bit of prestige and power. And likewise, the Greeks want them, in part (*), because they have become a symbol.

    If this was not the case, one or either could just do with casts.

    Therefore any 'solution' has to be one that allows both sides to preserve, and give, a little face.

    (*) Or parts...
    Yes, it's only partly about the marbles, or whatever artifact nation x chooses to seek or retain as they case may be.
  • Correct me please if I have this wrong but my understanding is that Elgin effectively rescued the marbles. The Greeks weren't interested in them and would probably have ground them into dust to make concrete.*

    This doesn't of course mean that they are legally ours, and even if they are I'd have thought it was about time they were handed back, if only as a gesture of goodwill to a friendly democratic nation. The only reason for hesitation would be the matter of encouraging a zillion other claims, mostly spurious too.

    Maybe leaseback makes sense.


    * Yes, I know I could Google this, but I generally find asking PB is quicker and more accurate.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,112
    British Museum = Biggest Stolen Goods Warehouse in the World :lol:
This discussion has been closed.