I’ve been surprised for a while that nobody has had a pop at him. I guess he has a v expensive security team and super protected home but he’s definitely at risk I would think.
I’ve been surprised for a while that nobody has had a pop at him. I guess he has a v expensive security team and super protected home but he’s definitely at risk I would think.
Haven't heard that one before but I do remember Walz peddling stories about Vance's sexual activities.
The 'Vance shags his couch' being a variant of 'hillbillies shag their sisters'.
Don't worry. I think your team has got this. Hats off to William Glenn for his endeavours.
Still don't see the attraction myself mind.
I want Trump to lose.
Perhaps if Harris and Walz stuck to the issues instead of spouting bigoted crap they would be more likely to win.
Trump does nothing *but* spout bigoted crap, so even if you were right (which you are not) that can’t be a possible explanation.
Not logically true
Trump voters are looking for a solution to their tough lies
Trump offers them that (albeit simplistic and one that one work, but they don’t know that).
Harris/Walz don’t
I’m not sure of your point, unless you say that babbling nonsense about sharks, eating pets, Jesus counting ballots, racist abuse of his rival and the deep state is not ‘bigoted crap’ and is instead somehow a solution to people’s ills.
He’s saying “your life is shit, it’s not your fault. It’s the others. I’m going to protect you and look after you”.
Everything else is details.
It’s garbage but it’s appealing.
The Democrats are not communicating a solution that works to the left behind.
The argument (such it was) of the poster was that Harris and Walz would lose because they are spouting 'bigoted crap.' (Which is not true, but this is a poster who refused to accept Russell was a better wicketkeeper than Stewart even after being shown vast amounts of evidence that he was wrong, so let's be easy here.)
I pointed out if that was true, Trump would have lost already, because everything he says is 'bigoted crap.'
So your point doesn't actually follow. In fact, if anything it tends to confirm what I was saying.
Ive seen some claims doing the roubds that GOP favouring pollsters havew been pumping out a highy volume of polls favouring Trump, not surpsingly, in order to create an impression
No idea how much veracity to it but nothing would surprise me.
However since those claims started circulating, the shift to Trump has been backed up by 'high-quality' polls, so it seems to be real.
Robert corrected you on this last night. The shift is real but not so far as you'd have us believe.
I am not entirely sure how ramping Trump's KPis on a UK betting blog benefits your guy.
Comments
He’s not wrong
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1848130548746846276?s=46&t=bulOICNH15U6kB0MwE6Lfw
The Ukrainians
I pointed out if that was true, Trump would have lost already, because everything he says is 'bigoted crap.'
So your point doesn't actually follow. In fact, if anything it tends to confirm what I was saying.
NEW THREAD
I am not entirely sure how ramping Trump's KPis on a UK betting blog benefits your guy.