Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Why do some right wing Tory MPs want to overturn a democratic vote? – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,213
edited July 4 in General
Why do some right wing Tory MPs want to overturn a democratic vote? – politicalbetting.com

EXC: A 'significant' number of Tory MPs will join Reform after the election if they don't get their preferred candidate in the final 2 for the next Tory leadership contest pic.twitter.com/196vN7D2xj

Read the full story here

«1345

Comments

  • BatteryCorrectHorseBatteryCorrectHorse Posts: 4,089
    edited June 18
    I am first!

    With this platform, I would like to implore the Gods to please allow @CorrectHorseBattery back.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,144
    Second; Sunak should be so lucky
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,124
    Not many MPs from the Red Wall? Not any MPs from the Red Wall most likely, and if they descend into civil war BEFORE the election, then not very many MPs from the Blue Wall either,
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 50,144

    I don't believe for one second that a significant number of Tory MPs will join Reform after the election.

    For the first thing, that would require there to be a significant number of Tory MPs after the election.

    Yes, the way that tweet elided from “MPs” to “candidates” was telling.
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,832

    I am first!

    With this platform, I would like to implore the Gods to please allow @CorrectHorseBattery back.

    A staple part of the site
  • Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 3,944
    Selebian said:

    I am first!

    With this platform, I would like to implore the Gods to please allow @CorrectHorseBattery back.

    A staple part of the site
    stable surely?
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,360
    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,832

    Selebian said:

    I am first!

    With this platform, I would like to implore the Gods to please allow @CorrectHorseBattery back.

    A staple part of the site
    stable surely?
    Depends how much you follow xkcd

    But part of the PB stable, for sure
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,360

    Selebian said:

    I am first!

    With this platform, I would like to implore the Gods to please allow @CorrectHorseBattery back.

    A staple part of the site
    stable surely?
    Staple.

    https://xkcd.com/936/
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 4,592

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    I don't see how the Tories and Reform merge. Tories are pro-Ukraine. Reform are pro-Russia.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792
    HYUFD said:

    I see Royal Ascot is this week, someone should do a straw poll, if the Tories can't even win with that crowd we know they are facing meltdown!

    Is it a particularly Tory constituency? The ratio of poshos to proles at Ascot is very low. Most people there are ordinary joes on the piss for a grand day out (less so on the Tuesday, granted, but for most of the week). I reckon it would vote broadly in line with the national profile.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,360

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    I don't see how the Tories and Reform merge. Tories are pro-Ukraine. Reform are pro-Russia.
    So was Corbyn and look how long he lasted as Labour leader.
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,832

    I don't believe for one second that a significant number of Tory MPs will join Reform after the election.

    For the first thing, that would require there to be a significant number of Tory MPs after the election.

    Maybe statistically significant - afterall, if one does it we can reject the null hypothesis.

    Mind you, I wouldn't want to make any assumptions about the normality of the Con MPs, although even if not a bell curve there are likely to be bell-ends.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 63,118
    LOL.

    Tory "Candidates" threatening all sorts after they are elected in July.

    Flippin' hilarious.

    Vast numbers of them will just be losers and will have no say in the leadership other than as an ordinary member of the party.


  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,275
    Farooq said:

    If Reform-minded Tories leave and join Reform, that will be good news for the Conservatives.
    Sure, it'll be a bit of a ruck for a bit, but nothing saves the soul of a floundering party like a self-purge of the nutters. Bring it on.

    We're already seeing signs that the destruction of the Tories will ultimately lead to the destruction of Labour too. Then we'll have a true realignment.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,792

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Doesn't the entire thread header assume the Conservatives lose and there's a vacancy? It's a bit early to call that.
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 4,592

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    I don't see how the Tories and Reform merge. Tories are pro-Ukraine. Reform are pro-Russia.
    So was Corbyn and look how long he lasted as Labour leader.
    Huh? Corbyn was gone as Labour leader before 2022.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Farooq said:

    If Reform-minded Tories leave and join Reform, that will be good news for the Conservatives.
    Sure, it'll be a bit of a ruck for a bit, but nothing saves the soul of a floundering party like a self-purge of the nutters. Bring it on.

    We're already seeing signs that the destruction of the Tories will ultimately lead to the destruction of Labour too. Then we'll have a true realignment.
    Can you point me to one of these signs?
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,175
    .

    Selebian said:

    I am first!

    With this platform, I would like to implore the Gods to please allow @CorrectHorseBattery back.

    A staple part of the site
    stable surely?
    Quite evidently not.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 6,919
    edited June 18
    All this is completely predicated on how well Reform do at this election. At the moment, that feels very much up in the air.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,360

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    I don't see how the Tories and Reform merge. Tories are pro-Ukraine. Reform are pro-Russia.
    So was Corbyn and look how long he lasted as Labour leader.
    Huh? Corbyn was gone as Labour leader before 2022.
    Huh?

    He was already still pro-Russia and pro-Putin and anti-West before then.

    And Russia/Putin didn't only become a problem in 2022. Or with Salisbury either.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,890
    edited June 18

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    You are thus in big trouble with HY. Do you really want to be accused of being an apologist for socialism over the next 27 years?
  • jamesdoylejamesdoyle Posts: 790
    That would be the funniest of all outcomes, wouldn't it?:

    1. The Cons scrape in ahead of the LibDems as official opposition
    2. They have a fight over who the new leader is
    3. Split
    4. End up third and fourth (or fourth and fifth?) largest parties in the Commons.
  • Peter_the_PunterPeter_the_Punter Posts: 14,466

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    I don't see how the Tories and Reform merge. Tories are pro-Ukraine. Reform are pro-Russia.
    So was Corbyn and look how long he lasted as Labour leader.
    Huh? Corbyn was gone as Labour leader before 2022.
    Huh?

    He was already still pro-Russia and pro-Putin and anti-West before then.

    And Russia/Putin didn't only become a problem in 2022. Or with Salisbury either.
    On topic, isn't this just so many baldies fighting over the comb?
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,275
    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    If Reform-minded Tories leave and join Reform, that will be good news for the Conservatives.
    Sure, it'll be a bit of a ruck for a bit, but nothing saves the soul of a floundering party like a self-purge of the nutters. Bring it on.

    We're already seeing signs that the destruction of the Tories will ultimately lead to the destruction of Labour too. Then we'll have a true realignment.
    What signs? I would like that to be true but I don't think it is.
    If you extrapolate the Tory decline down to single figures, then it's already clear that Labour will be fighting on two fronts in England: against Reform in the Red Wall and against the Lib Dems in the south.

    My hypothesis is that the anti-Labour vote is more efficient if you take the Tory party out of the equation.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,360

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    You are thus in big trouble with HY. Do you really want to be accused of socialism for the next 27 years?
    What difference does it make when Sunak's Tories are increasing taxes, spending and redistribution to record levels?
  • eekeek Posts: 28,585
    edited June 18
    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    Houghton and Sunderland South might give a good pointer to RFM fortunes early on.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,585

    Farooq said:

    Farooq said:

    If Reform-minded Tories leave and join Reform, that will be good news for the Conservatives.
    Sure, it'll be a bit of a ruck for a bit, but nothing saves the soul of a floundering party like a self-purge of the nutters. Bring it on.

    We're already seeing signs that the destruction of the Tories will ultimately lead to the destruction of Labour too. Then we'll have a true realignment.
    What signs? I would like that to be true but I don't think it is.
    If you extrapolate the Tory decline down to single figures, then it's already clear that Labour will be fighting on two fronts in England: against Reform in the Red Wall and against the Lib Dems in the south.

    My hypothesis is that the anti-Labour vote is more efficient if you take the Tory party out of the equation.
    Against reform in the red wall - they top out at 25% because most people don’t want to vote for racist facists.

    When reform have 1000s of councilors I will accept your argument but until then reform won’t be replacing the Tory party anywhere
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    edited June 18
    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,175
    Did Leon ever explain his odd Ghostbusters reference on the last thread ?
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,360
    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My 87 year old grandmother finds using an app nowadays easier than being mobile and getting anywhere.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,890
    I do quite like this dry comment from JV's brief in the original case:

    Gervase de Wilde, representing Mr Vine, said: “Mr Barton had many options for engaging in the abuse of Mr Vine but he chose the one toxic word to do so, which means paedophile.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,585
    edited June 18
    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    You work at university - my last but one project was technical architect on the new counter service for a UK high street bank.

    The demographic of people going into branches to get things done are old people going in to perform transactions that as a bank you don’t want employees doing
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,352
    Pulpstar said:

    Houghton and Sunderland South might give a good pointer to RFM fortunes early on.

    An article on the counting race:

    BBC News - Who will be the first to return election result?
    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c100207p326o

    tl;dr
    Newcastle not expected to contesting quite so hard as financial and boundary changes not helpful to them.
    Sunderland still in the game
    but Ashington & Blyth a decent chance of declaring first, Northumbs having poached Sunderland's fast count guru, and only nobbled last time by a recount

    Number crunchers, make sure Ashington is on your expected results lists.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,585
    Pulpstar said:

    Houghton and Sunderland South might give a good pointer to RFM fortunes early on.

    Will be the second seat announced - think Blyth is aiming to be first (the head of elections in Northumberland previously did the job in Sunderland and wants the glory)
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,960
    IanB2 said:

    Second; Sunak should be so lucky

    The absurdity of this election is that the Tories finishing second in terms of seats is now a try for...
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,904
    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My Dad (78) used to be elbows-deep with tinkering with various Amstrad parts in the late-80s. He'd be a liability trying to do banking in branch, because he refuses to have his hearing tested.

    My father-in-law (70) still refuses to use a bank card. There will be fewer refuseniks as time goes on, though. Even in rural Ireland.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,645

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    What's this "lending" business? You can't have it back, you know.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,417

    I don't believe for one second that a significant number of Tory MPs will join Reform after the election.

    For the first thing, that would require there to be a significant number of Tory MPs after the election.

    One would be a significant number in the context of zero RefUK MPs.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,382
    Re the header: if that happens Labour are going to be in for ten years... :(
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,507
    edited June 18
    I have always believed if you want to change party as an MP you must stand for re-election unless the GE is say a maximum of a year away.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,417
    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My mate recently fell for a phone scam but was saved by his incompetent attempts to transfer the money as instructed, succeeding only in locking his bank account.
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,240

    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My Dad (78) used to be elbows-deep with tinkering with various Amstrad parts in the late-80s.
    Hmm. Wonder if I knew him...
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,549

    📊 NEW: Labour's lead climbs to campaign high. Focaldata

    Labour: 43% (+1)
    Conservative: 21% (-3)
    Reform UK: 16% (+1)
    Liberal Democrats: 10% (+1)
    Green: 5% (-)

    Fieldwork conducted 14–17 June
    2,604 respondents (GB)

    They are so utterly fucked 42 polls since a like for like increase
    https://x.com/focaldataHQ/status/1803059872390353022?s=19

    I am increasingly confident of my two little ponies from @TimS
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,832
    kinabalu said:

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    What's this "lending" business? You can't have it back, you know.
    Hang on, we get it back after (at most) five years, don't we?

    Although without interest and somewhat devalued given population inflation :disappointed:
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,805

    I have always believed if you want to change party as an MP you must stand for re-election unless the GE is say a maximum of a year away.

    Similarly if the PM is replaced by their party there should be a GE within 12 months.
  • CleitophonCleitophon Posts: 489
    Vote conservative, get reform.... that is a bad campaign motto. If you are a centrist then there is every incentive to vote lib dem or labour.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,417
    eek said:

    If you want an idea of how defensive the Tory campaign has become, Sunak has just been meeting fishermen in Geoffrey Cox’s constituency in West Devon, where he has a majority of 25,000

    Did Rishi remind said fishing folk how much they have benefited from Brexit or is that still the Tory achievement that dare not speak its name?
  • LeonLeon Posts: 56,549

    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My mate recently fell for a phone scam but was saved by his incompetent attempts to transfer the money as instructed, succeeding only in locking his bank account.
    That's the one that nearly fooled me when I was in Tbilisi. They are REALLY good, it was only when the guy claimed he went to Sixth Form at "Queen Mary's College" that I started to suspect. They have names and numbers that check out when you Google, they can pass you to a manager who sounds super confident, and they're only going to get better
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,507
    edited June 18
    A blast from the past....

    Four members of the UK's richest family are on trial in Switzerland amid allegations they spent more money caring for their dog than their servants. The Hinduja family, worth an estimated £37bn ($47bn), is accused of exploitation and human trafficking.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cm55gzvv1dro
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,904

    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My Dad (78) used to be elbows-deep with tinkering with various Amstrad parts in the late-80s.
    Hmm. Wonder if I knew him...
    I doubt it. He's exceptionally socially maladroit, and the only social friend we ever knew he had at that time visited us only once. Most of the time spent debating whether my sister should take double award science GCSE (she didn't).

    That decryption may fit several people, however.
  • BartholomewRobertsBartholomewRoberts Posts: 22,360
    kinabalu said:

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    What's this "lending" business? You can't have it back, you know.
    Of course I can, at the next election I get it back to vote for whomever I choose to vote for next time.
  • .

    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My mate recently fell for a phone scam but was saved by his incompetent attempts to transfer the money as instructed, succeeding only in locking his bank account.
    My mates dad suffered similar, only saved when he phoned my mate from the cashpoint machine asking if he'd help him withdrawing 2 grand out of the cashpoint (his limit was 250) and sending it to "HMRC"! Luckily, he couldn't understand the scammers accent and thought they wanted cash not bank transfer. If he'd been a bit more competent in banking online, and wasn't stressed by an "HMRC" phonecall demanding 2 grand payment within the hour, he'd have paid them.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,578

    I don't believe for one second that a significant number of Tory MPs will join Reform after the election.

    For the first thing, that would require there to be a significant number of Tory MPs after the election.

    Well played.

    In all seriousness I don't think it the most likely scenario, but I think it's possible.

    I think it more likely that if the Tories are sub 100 seats that a leadership candidate advocating merger with Reform could emerge, off the threat of MPs jumping ship.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,945
    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    Some people like to interact with actual people rather than doing everything on computers/phones.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,507

    I have always believed if you want to change party as an MP you must stand for re-election unless the GE is say a maximum of a year away.

    Similarly if the PM is replaced by their party there should be a GE within 12 months.
    Steady on....we would be having a GE every other week like Holland or Belgium. I am not sure I could take such excitement.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,507
    Bacon ice cream and nugget overload sees misfiring McDonald's AI withdrawn

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c722gne7qngo

    I suspect the mistake you made their was buying IBM's shitty technology.
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,986
    Afternoon again all :)

    To be fair, I remember in 1997 pre-election analysis trying to work out if a post-election Conservative rump would be more or less Eurosceptic (remember that?)

    It was broadly assumed Portillo would be a leadership contender as would Clarke and it seems possible they would be the two runners but with Portillo losing in Enfield Southgate, Hague, Howard, Redwood and Lilley all joined the fight which ended with the notorious Clarke-Redwood Pact and Hague emerging as the new young hope for the stern, unbending Tories.

    I don't think we're anythere near establishing the runners and riders - so much depends, as I often say at my favourite steakhouse, on the size of the rump and how well cooked it is (that's an analogy which started well but declined quickly).
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,472
    eek said:

    If you want an idea of how defensive the Tory campaign has become, Sunak has just been meeting fishermen in Geoffrey Cox’s constituency in West Devon, where he has a majority of 25,000

    The fishermen would be lucky to catch Geoffrey Cox, unless they're casting their nets out in the British Virgin Islands.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 72,175
    Japanese industrial production capacity fell only around 15% as result of US bombing in WWII. Their exports in 1947 fell 90% compared to pre-war.

    (I am re-assessing my mental models of economic vulnerability to trade/industrial/technological step changes.)
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    edited June 18
    Yes I doubt if any of these redwall Tory MPs hold their seats anyway, so if they defect to Reform if the ERG do not get a candidate in the final 2 to the members in a likely post Rishi resignation leadership election so be it.

    I would not be too complacent if I was Starmer though in an age where Trump and even Le Pen lead many polls, if the economy is poor midterm of a Labour government and immigration numbers remain high anything could happen at the next general election whoever the Conservative leader is. Reform have also showed themselves capable of picking up ex Labour working class Leave voters as much as Tory rightwingers
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    That’s a good Focaldata poll for Labour.
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061
    The polls seem to be herding the Tories to about 20%, catastrophic levels of support. Its all one way traffic. They are going to struggle to form the opposition, its happening!
  • HeathenerHeathener Posts: 7,084
    edited June 18
    viewcode said:

    Re the header: if that happens Labour are going to be in for ten years... :(

    Fifteen to twenty
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,904

    📊 NEW: Labour's lead climbs to campaign high. Focaldata

    Labour: 43% (+1)
    Conservative: 21% (-3)
    Reform UK: 16% (+1)
    Liberal Democrats: 10% (+1)
    Green: 5% (-)

    Fieldwork conducted 14–17 June
    2,604 respondents (GB)

    They are so utterly fucked 42 polls since a like for like increase
    https://x.com/focaldataHQ/status/1803059872390353022?s=19

    Ooft. I've made my prediction now, and I'm sticking to it, but the last few polls have been awful for the Tories.

    There have been eight polls since the YouGov crossover poll. Labour have been up in three, down in three, unchanged in two. The Tories have been down in six and unchanged in two.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875

    📊 NEW: Labour's lead climbs to campaign high. Focaldata

    Labour: 43% (+1)
    Conservative: 21% (-3)
    Reform UK: 16% (+1)
    Liberal Democrats: 10% (+1)
    Green: 5% (-)

    Fieldwork conducted 14–17 June
    2,604 respondents (GB)

    They are so utterly fucked 42 polls since a like for like increase
    https://x.com/focaldataHQ/status/1803059872390353022?s=19

    Tories still 5% ahead of Reform and a clear second though. I agree however that the final Starmer v Sunak debate next week at 9pm on BBC1 is crucial for Rishi to close the gap with Labour before polling day
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959
    Ugh.

    Sir Keir Starmer has opened the door to tax rises for millions of Britons by defining a working person as someone who relies on public services and doesn’t have savings.

    The Labour leader has repeatedly ruled out putting up taxes on what he calls “working people” who he says have borne the brunt of the cost of living crisis.

    Asked what he meant by the term, he said it refers to “people who earn their living, rely on our services and don’t really have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble”.

    His definition means millions of Britons including pensioners, savers, and those who use private services like healthcare may not be covered by his tax rise pledge.


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/18/starmer-leaves-door-open-to-tax-rises-for-millions/
  • wooliedyedwooliedyed Posts: 10,061

    📊 NEW: Labour's lead climbs to campaign high. Focaldata

    Labour: 43% (+1)
    Conservative: 21% (-3)
    Reform UK: 16% (+1)
    Liberal Democrats: 10% (+1)
    Green: 5% (-)

    Fieldwork conducted 14–17 June
    2,604 respondents (GB)

    They are so utterly fucked 42 polls since a like for like increase
    https://x.com/focaldataHQ/status/1803059872390353022?s=19

    Ooft. I've made my prediction now, and I'm sticking to it, but the last few polls have been awful for the Tories.

    There have been eight polls since the YouGov crossover poll. Labour have been up in three, down in three, unchanged in two. The Tories have been down in six and unchanged in two.
    Yes and big drops with some pollsters. They need some 'improving' polling or I think sub 20% is becoming likely. I think 25% looks realistically best expectation if the pollsters are getting turnout right
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 123,875
    edited June 18

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    You are thus in big trouble with HY. Do you really want to be accused of being an apologist for socialism over the next 27 years?
    Bart also voted for New Labour in 2001 when Tory loyalists like me were campaigning for Hague as I am now campaigning still for Sunak's Tories, voting Labour is not an entirely new thing for him
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,472
    HYUFD said:

    📊 NEW: Labour's lead climbs to campaign high. Focaldata

    Labour: 43% (+1)
    Conservative: 21% (-3)
    Reform UK: 16% (+1)
    Liberal Democrats: 10% (+1)
    Green: 5% (-)

    Fieldwork conducted 14–17 June
    2,604 respondents (GB)

    They are so utterly fucked 42 polls since a like for like increase
    https://x.com/focaldataHQ/status/1803059872390353022?s=19

    Tories still 5% ahead of Reform and a clear second though. I agree however that the final Starmer v Sunak debate next week at 9pm on BBC1 is crucial for Rishi to close the gap with Labour before polling day
    HYUFD: Tories are clear second, still time to close the gap with Labour.

    Everybody else: Tories are fucked.

    Brilliant HYUFD, truly indefatigable.
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,832
    HYUFD said:

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    You are thus in big trouble with HY. Do you really want to be accused of being an apologist for socialism over the next 27 years?
    Bart also voted for New Labour in 2001 when Tory loyalists were campaigning for Hague as I am now campaigning still for Sunak's Tories, voting Labour is not an entirely new thing for him
    Do you have a dossier on all of our past non-Tory votes, HY? :open_mouth:
  • El_CapitanoEl_Capitano Posts: 4,240

    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My Dad (78) used to be elbows-deep with tinkering with various Amstrad parts in the late-80s.
    Hmm. Wonder if I knew him...
    I doubt it. He's exceptionally socially maladroit, and the only social friend we ever knew he had at that time visited us only once. Most of the time spent debating whether my sister should take double award science GCSE (she didn't).

    That decryption may fit several people, however.
    It may well. I knew a fair number of socially maladroit Amstrad tinkerers in the late 80s and early 90s!
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,507
    edited June 18
    Selebian said:

    HYUFD said:

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    You are thus in big trouble with HY. Do you really want to be accused of being an apologist for socialism over the next 27 years?
    Bart also voted for New Labour in 2001 when Tory loyalists were campaigning for Hague as I am now campaigning still for Sunak's Tories, voting Labour is not an entirely new thing for him
    Do you have a dossier on all of our past non-Tory votes, HY? :open_mouth:
    The "collaborators" will be first against the wall....
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 28,417

    Bacon ice cream and nugget overload sees misfiring McDonald's AI withdrawn

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c722gne7qngo

    I suspect the mistake you made their was buying IBM's shitty technology.

    It worked for Heston Blumenthal.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 17,449
    stodge said:

    Afternoon again all :)

    To be fair, I remember in 1997 pre-election analysis trying to work out if a post-election Conservative rump would be more or less Eurosceptic (remember that?)

    It was broadly assumed Portillo would be a leadership contender as would Clarke and it seems possible they would be the two runners but with Portillo losing in Enfield Southgate, Hague, Howard, Redwood and Lilley all joined the fight which ended with the notorious Clarke-Redwood Pact and Hague emerging as the new young hope for the stern, unbending Tories.

    I don't think we're anythere near establishing the runners and riders - so much depends, as I often say at my favourite steakhouse, on the size of the rump and how well cooked it is (that's an analogy which started well but declined quickly).

    Much like Sunak's premiership.
  • jamesdoylejamesdoyle Posts: 790
    kle4 said:

    I don't believe for one second that a significant number of Tory MPs will join Reform after the election.

    For the first thing, that would require there to be a significant number of Tory MPs after the election.

    Well played.

    In all seriousness I don't think it the most likely scenario, but I think it's possible.

    I think it more likely that if the Tories are sub 100 seats that a leadership candidate advocating merger with Reform could emerge, off the threat of MPs jumping ship.
    I think this is true, and was the point of my header the other day, that that's why the Conservative brand has to be Ratnered in the election, so Farage or Tory-Farage can't build off it.
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,639

    Ugh.

    Sir Keir Starmer has opened the door to tax rises for millions of Britons by defining a working person as someone who relies on public services and doesn’t have savings.

    The Labour leader has repeatedly ruled out putting up taxes on what he calls “working people” who he says have borne the brunt of the cost of living crisis.

    Asked what he meant by the term, he said it refers to “people who earn their living, rely on our services and don’t really have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble”.

    His definition means millions of Britons including pensioners, savers, and those who use private services like healthcare may not be covered by his tax rise pledge.


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/18/starmer-leaves-door-open-to-tax-rises-for-millions/

    Watch out

    There's a CGT increase about!
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,832
    edited June 18

    Ugh.

    Sir Keir Starmer has opened the door to tax rises for millions of Britons by defining a working person as someone who relies on public services and doesn’t have savings.

    The Labour leader has repeatedly ruled out putting up taxes on what he calls “working people” who he says have borne the brunt of the cost of living crisis.

    Asked what he meant by the term, he said it refers to “people who earn their living, rely on our services and don’t really have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble”.

    His definition means millions of Britons including pensioners, savers, and those who use private services like healthcare may not be covered by his tax rise pledge.


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/18/starmer-leaves-door-open-to-tax-rises-for-millions/

    Well, that includes me - not sure where my cheque book is, so I'd struggle to write a cheque if I got into trouble :smiley:
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 82,507
    edited June 18

    Ugh.

    Sir Keir Starmer has opened the door to tax rises for millions of Britons by defining a working person as someone who relies on public services and doesn’t have savings.

    The Labour leader has repeatedly ruled out putting up taxes on what he calls “working people” who he says have borne the brunt of the cost of living crisis.

    Asked what he meant by the term, he said it refers to “people who earn their living, rely on our services and don’t really have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble”.

    His definition means millions of Britons including pensioners, savers, and those who use private services like healthcare may not be covered by his tax rise pledge.


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/18/starmer-leaves-door-open-to-tax-rises-for-millions/

    Every once in a while the mask slips and I don't really like what I see. Its certainly not something Blair or Mandelson said or thought.
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,709

    Ugh.

    Sir Keir Starmer has opened the door to tax rises for millions of Britons by defining a working person as someone who relies on public services and doesn’t have savings.

    The Labour leader has repeatedly ruled out putting up taxes on what he calls “working people” who he says have borne the brunt of the cost of living crisis.

    Asked what he meant by the term, he said it refers to “people who earn their living, rely on our services and don’t really have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble”.

    His definition means millions of Britons including pensioners, savers, and those who use private services like healthcare may not be covered by his tax rise pledge.


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/18/starmer-leaves-door-open-to-tax-rises-for-millions/

    What was Sir Keir playing at here? This could provide Rishi with a bazooka at the debate if he aims it properly.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,805
    edited June 18
    deleted
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,645
    Selebian said:

    kinabalu said:

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    What's this "lending" business? You can't have it back, you know.
    Hang on, we get it back after (at most) five years, don't we?

    Although without interest and somewhat devalued given population inflation :disappointed:
    No, that's a different one. This one you will never see again. If it's Labour it stays that way for all eternity. I just wanted to make sure Bart realized this*. I'm a Red through and through but we don't want to be getting votes under false pretences.

    * Edit: I've seen his reply now and it appears he does.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,778
    HYUFD said:

    📊 NEW: Labour's lead climbs to campaign high. Focaldata

    Labour: 43% (+1)
    Conservative: 21% (-3)
    Reform UK: 16% (+1)
    Liberal Democrats: 10% (+1)
    Green: 5% (-)

    Fieldwork conducted 14–17 June
    2,604 respondents (GB)

    They are so utterly fucked 42 polls since a like for like increase
    https://x.com/focaldataHQ/status/1803059872390353022?s=19

    Tories still 5% ahead of Reform and a clear second though. I agree however that the final Starmer v Sunak debate next week at 9pm on BBC1 is crucial for Rishi to close the gap with Labour before polling day
    "Close the gap"?
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 32,945
    Sky News — "Rishi Sunak tells farmers: I will always have your back".
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,832

    .

    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    My mate recently fell for a phone scam but was saved by his incompetent attempts to transfer the money as instructed, succeeding only in locking his bank account.
    My mates dad suffered similar, only saved when he phoned my mate from the cashpoint machine asking if he'd help him withdrawing 2 grand out of the cashpoint (his limit was 250) and sending it to "HMRC"! Luckily, he couldn't understand the scammers accent and thought they wanted cash not bank transfer. If he'd been a bit more competent in banking online, and wasn't stressed by an "HMRC" phonecall demanding 2 grand payment within the hour, he'd have paid them.
    What was he going to do with the £2k cash, hand deliver it to the nearest HMRC office?
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,986
    HYUFD said:

    Yes I doubt if any of these redwall Tory MPs hold their seats anyway, so if they defect to Reform if the ERG do not get a candidate in the final 2 to the members in a likely post Rishi resignation leadership election so be it.

    I would not be too complacent if I was Starmer though in an age where Trump and even Le Pen lead many polls, if the economy is poor midterm of a Labour government and immigration numbers remain high anything could happen at the next general election whoever the Conservative leader is. Reform have also showed themselves capable of picking up ex Labour working class Leave voters as much as Tory rightwingers

    Well, of course and you could argue the National Government had a huge majority over Labour in 1931 yet within 14 years and one World War, it was Labour who won the landslide.

    The wheel turns - the problem your party has is IF it is neither Government nor official Opposition it will be in a place where it has never been and people will justifiably ask what is the point of the Conservative Party?

    I find it hard to even contemplate this having been in politics for over 40 years but the possibility of a Liberal Democrat as LOTO is now credible. There was much talk of re-alignment in the heady days of the Alliance but it was always about the Alliance replacing Labour and challenging the Conservatives - no one saw the opposite scenario and yet it is feasible if still unlikely.

    I suspect both Davey and Farage will make strong appeals to the remaining Conservatives both at Westminster and locally to come across. The Conservatives risk being emasculated from two sides.

    Who will be left, Ben Houchen, Tim Oliver ?
  • jamesdoylejamesdoyle Posts: 790
    HYUFD said:

    📊 NEW: Labour's lead climbs to campaign high. Focaldata

    Labour: 43% (+1)
    Conservative: 21% (-3)
    Reform UK: 16% (+1)
    Liberal Democrats: 10% (+1)
    Green: 5% (-)

    Fieldwork conducted 14–17 June
    2,604 respondents (GB)

    They are so utterly fucked 42 polls since a like for like increase
    https://x.com/focaldataHQ/status/1803059872390353022?s=19

    Tories still 5% ahead of Reform and a clear second though. I agree however that the final Starmer v Sunak debate next week at 9pm on BBC1 is crucial for Rishi to close the gap with Labour before polling day
    1. Why, if Sunak has failed to close the gap following the previous debates, will he close the gap this time? (Spoiler: he won't)
    2. 5% ahead, but in the previous Focaldata poll that 5% was 9%. The trend is not your friend.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,959

    Ugh.

    Sir Keir Starmer has opened the door to tax rises for millions of Britons by defining a working person as someone who relies on public services and doesn’t have savings.

    The Labour leader has repeatedly ruled out putting up taxes on what he calls “working people” who he says have borne the brunt of the cost of living crisis.

    Asked what he meant by the term, he said it refers to “people who earn their living, rely on our services and don’t really have the ability to write a cheque when they get into trouble”.

    His definition means millions of Britons including pensioners, savers, and those who use private services like healthcare may not be covered by his tax rise pledge.


    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/06/18/starmer-leaves-door-open-to-tax-rises-for-millions/

    Every once in a while the mask slips and I don't really like what I see. Its certainly not something Blair or Mandelson said or thought.
    I was raised by parents who believed that debt (other than a mortgage) was the eighth deadliest sin, I cannot help be a saver.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    He has to go for CGT rather than council tax because CGT is paid by other people and council tax is paid by all of us.

    To confuse those two demographics before an election is a very dangerous move. No matter your lead in the polls.
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 8,832
    kinabalu said:

    Selebian said:

    kinabalu said:

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    What's this "lending" business? You can't have it back, you know.
    Hang on, we get it back after (at most) five years, don't we?

    Although without interest and somewhat devalued given population inflation :disappointed:
    No, that's a different one. This one you will never see again. If it's Labour it stays that way for all eternity. I just wanted to make sure Bart realized this*. I'm a Red through and through but we don't want to be getting votes under false pretences.

    * Edit: I've seen his reply now and it appears he does.
    Oh! How do I 'change' my vote then, if it's a brand spanking new one at each election and the old one is set forever?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,046
    kinabalu said:

    Selebian said:

    kinabalu said:

    Also TSE is normally sensible but in this post he's surely in the wrong?

    if the Tories and Reform remain fractured and trying to outdo each other on an extreme right wing agenda then Labour will easily win a second term.

    Not on a second term, Labour will almost definitely easily win a second term either way, but on the implication of it being bad for the Tories for there to be a fracture between Tories and Reform.

    Worst possible news is if that "fracture" is "healed" and the Tories and Reform merge. Best news is if Reform-leading extremists bugger off and leave the Tories and the Tories can focus on regaining the centre-ground and becoming a big tent once more.

    Just as the Corbynites fracturing and heading to the Greens was good news for Labour.

    Afternoon, Bart. Have you decided how you are voting?
    Lending my vote to the Labour Party.

    Only party pledging more housing and reform of our planning system. Though they're not remotely going far enough for me, they at least are grasping what the problem is.

    Still don't like Labour economics and I expect the party will do many things I dislike, but so does what I still consider to be own party in the Tories so I'm not voting for them this year.
    What's this "lending" business? You can't have it back, you know.
    Hang on, we get it back after (at most) five years, don't we?

    Although without interest and somewhat devalued given population inflation :disappointed:
    No, that's a different one. This one you will never see again. If it's Labour it stays that way for all eternity. I just wanted to make sure Bart realized this*. I'm a Red through and through but we don't want to be getting votes under false pretences.

    * Edit: I've seen his reply now and it appears he does.
    Wait, so you are saying @HYUFD isn't getting his Plaid vote back.
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,904

    📊 NEW: Labour's lead climbs to campaign high. Focaldata

    Labour: 43% (+1)
    Conservative: 21% (-3)
    Reform UK: 16% (+1)
    Liberal Democrats: 10% (+1)
    Green: 5% (-)

    Fieldwork conducted 14–17 June
    2,604 respondents (GB)

    They are so utterly fucked 42 polls since a like for like increase
    https://x.com/focaldataHQ/status/1803059872390353022?s=19

    Ooft. I've made my prediction now, and I'm sticking to it, but the last few polls have been awful for the Tories.

    There have been eight polls since the YouGov crossover poll. Labour have been up in three, down in three, unchanged in two. The Tories have been down in six and unchanged in two.
    Yes and big drops with some pollsters. They need some 'improving' polling or I think sub 20% is becoming likely. I think 25% looks realistically best expectation if the pollsters are getting turnout right
    Focaldata are like Deltapoll - only recording falls in Tory support during the campaign. 26, 25, 24 and now 21.

    At this stage it looks like only Theresa May stands between Rishi Sunak and the worst election campaign in history.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 42,645
    Andy_JS said:

    TOPPING said:

    eek said:

    TOPPING said:

    I think we need @Anabobazina's view on this banking hub policy announcement. Lab's one builds on one from the Cons earlier in the year. Are we really saying that "bankless towns" is an issue out there?

    Yes especially for people who are 55+ and so not used to doing complex things online.

    The awkward bit is that many things will still be impossible because (for example) a big BACS transaction will require a secondary authorization that may not be possible in branch
    You what? What age do you suppose a large chunk of the PB demographic is (clue: 55+). Are you really saying that such a vital part of PB's contributing force is unable to transfer money or, indeed, buy a Tesco's Meal Deal using the latest technology?

    Perhaps 80+ and even then my 94-yr old mother has two banking apps on her phone and hasn't needed to go to a branch in years.
    Some people like to interact with actual people rather than doing everything on computers/phones.
    This is true. Eg I'll usually choose a manned checkout if the queue isn't too long. Little chinwag with the operative. It brightens their day.
This discussion has been closed.