Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Into the Great Wide Yonder – politicalbetting.com

SystemSystem Posts: 12,159
edited July 4 in General
imageInto the Great Wide Yonder – politicalbetting.com

So for a bit of fun, I decided to look at the Survation MRP polling conducted between 31st May and 13th June. This showed that all but 72 Tory MPs would lose their seats and I wondered what the make up of the Tory party would look like after the election if this prediction came true.

Read the full story here

«13456789

Comments

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,604
    Oooh was that a first?
  • East Hants a seat I know well. Will probably be a Tory hold but with a significantly reduced majority.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,173
    Thanks Richard, an interesting list.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859
    edited June 16
    Fourth, like the Tories deserve

    You can still get 1/3 from Ladbrokes on the Tories holding Sevenoaks. Surely your life saving should be heading their way? I have £100 on already.
  • ClippPClippP Posts: 1,903
    Are these not Tory MPs and the extent to which they are threatened by a Labour candidate?

    There are several seats on that list where the clear challenge comes from the Lib Dem candidate, I think.

    As an example... North Devon.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,615
    Alicia Kearns is in the top ten safest and could represent the One Nation wing in a post apocalypse leadership contest. 100/1 with Bet365.

    The Tories could do far worse, and probably will, but worth a few bob.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,401

    East Hants a seat I know well. Will probably be a Tory hold but with a significantly reduced majority.

    Likewise. Hinds will hold.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,874
    edited June 16
    Note with Survation Jenrick, Cleverly and Hunt and Mordaunt and Chalk are all senior Cabinet minister projected to lose their seats so would be ineligible to run for leader in the likely aftermath of a heavy defeat and Sunak resignation.

    As I said on the previous thread of the survivors above I tip the rump of more southern Tory MPs remaining to put Tugendhat and Barclay to the members, with Barclay winning and becoming Leader of the Opposition to the Starmer government.

    Should be pointed out Opinium last night still gives the Tories 104 seats, so slightly better than Survation but not much better. Pleased to see Brentwood and Ongar and Epping Forest at least stay blue though with both the Survation MRP above and Opinium

    https://x.com/OpiniumResearch/status/1802053423900065820?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet
    https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/fcgi-bin/usercode.py?scotcontrol=Y&CON=23&LAB=40&LIB=12&Reform=14&Green=7&UKIP=&TVCON=&TVLAB=&TVLIB=&TVReform=&TVGreen=&TVUKIP=&SCOTCON=15.2&SCOTLAB=36.7&SCOTLIB=6.9&SCOTReform=3.2&SCOTGreen=2.5&SCOTUKIP=&SCOTNAT=33.1&display=AllChanged&regorseat=(none)&boundary=2019nbbase
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 11,043
    Second election leaflet of the campaign! And it’s from Reform UK. Who says they have no ground game?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859

    Second election leaflet of the campaign! And it’s from Reform UK. Who says they have no ground game?

    I’ve had leaflets from Green, Reform, Labour and the Tories, so far. The Green hand delivered, the others by Freepost.
  • TazTaz Posts: 14,361

    East Hants a seat I know well. Will probably be a Tory hold but with a significantly reduced majority.

    North Durham, a seat I know well, will probably be a labour hold with an increased majority.
  • GhedebravGhedebrav Posts: 3,860
    It’s an interesting band of survivors. You could imagine coalescing into three broad groups; your one-nation wet types with Tuggers and Hinds, your Barclay drys, and the batshit wing with Braverman.

    I don’t know enough about the individuals here to guess which group would be in the ascendant though.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,874
    edited June 16
    Interesting that even with only 72 seats though the Tories would still hold a handful of seats they lost in 1997. For example Dartford was Labour, Witham was Labour (within Braintree at the time), Dumfrieshire, Clydesdale and Tweedale is the successor to 2 seats which went Labour and LD and North Devon and Hereford and South Herefordshire were LD in 1997.

    Mid Dorset and North Poole meanwhile went LD in 2001 but is projected to stay Tory even now too
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    The way shit is falling apart round here sadly I think they’re inevitable. The County’s about to go bust and the borough isn’t looking much better. The county being Kent which, barring a brief interlude, has been Tory since the Neolithic.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,009
    edited June 16
    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809
    And so they should, to be able to compensate for the last few years' inflation at the least.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,846
    Foxy said:

    Alicia Kearns is in the top ten safest and could represent the One Nation wing in a post apocalypse leadership contest. 100/1 with Bet365.

    The Tories could do far worse, and probably will, but worth a few bob.

    No chance but you may be on to something important nonetheless. While most of the famous names surviving are on the right, it's not clear that that wing will have a majority amongst remaining MPs. (Coincidentally, Wolf of Badenoch has just won the 3.10 race at Doncaster.)
  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 4,837
    ClippP said:

    Are these not Tory MPs and the extent to which they are threatened by a Labour candidate?

    There are several seats on that list where the clear challenge comes from the Lib Dem candidate, I think.

    As an example... North Devon.

    There are various models which will give slightly different combinations of survivors, but I imagine that there'll be a lot of overlap between the groups. We'll probably all take exception to some of the seats that are or are not on this particular list (again looking at the LD challenges, I think Harpenden and Berkhamsted is probably going to go yellow,) but it's probably worth looking at the names in totality and asking someone with a good knowledge of Tory MPs what kind of leader and policy direction a rump that looks something like this is liable to adopt.

    It's been suggested to me that a lot of the survivors will have been selected and positioned in ultra safe seats to try to prevent a hard right supremacy (which, as a first step, would require both leading candidates offered to the fossil membership in the leader ballot NOT to be Suella or some such similar figure.) That, in turn, would imply the start of a march back to a more orthodox small-c conservative offering, and a strong rejection of any accommodation with Reform. What do we think of that?
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,846
    edited June 16
    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,604
    edited June 16
    IanB2 said:

    Fourth, like the Tories deserve

    You can still get 1/3 from Ladbrokes on the Tories holding Sevenoaks. Surely your life saving should be heading their way? I have £100 on already.

    Well.



  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 71,031
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,604
    Nigelb said:
    I am impressed that you posted that before William Glenn did.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    Just accept that your credibility here is shot.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,651

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    I think it is a sign that some people have little to care about when a loyal Conservative is condemned for voting ... Conservative.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,401
    There you have it, everyone.

    Various left-wingere cheering Council Tax rises.

    That's what happens if Labour get in.

    A vote for Labour is a vote for your Council Tax bill going up.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,615
    Nigelb said:
    What's Farage's position on this? Is he pro-Putin still?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,009
    edited June 16

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    If I even attempted to influence how my wife voted, in either the U.K. or US elections, you’d see the first ever pinniped before the divorce courts. Or possibly a pinniped’s wife up on an animal cruelty charge.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,615

    There you have it, everyone.

    Various left-wingere cheering Council Tax rises.

    That's what happens if Labour get in.

    A vote for Labour is a vote for your Council Tax bill going up.

    I am not voting Labour, but it is a recognition that sound finances are needed.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,009
    DougSeal said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    If I even attempted to influence how my wife voted, in either the U.K. or US elections, you’d see the first ever pinniped before the divorce courts. Or possibly a pinniped’s wife up on an animal cruelty charge.
    That's for you - others may have see it differently
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,581

    Nigelb said:
    I am impressed that you posted that before William Glenn did.
    Yes, clearly Trump is serious about pushing for a swift Ukrainian victory. If he said the opposite it would create complacency among Ukraine's European allies and give Russia an opportunity.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494
    are we due another yougov MRP this week? I vaguely remembering sky saying that there'd be 3 prior to the election
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,009
    IanB2 said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    Just accept that your credibility here is shot.
    I have no idea why you are taking this so badly, but to be honest no amount of criticism will prevent me posting as honestly as I can and if you do not like it then that is a matter for you

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,507
    ClippP said:

    Are these not Tory MPs and the extent to which they are threatened by a Labour candidate?

    There are several seats on that list where the clear challenge comes from the Lib Dem candidate, I think.

    As an example... North Devon.

    Yep. The list is just the survivors. I have not differentiated the threats.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,782
    edited June 16

    Second election leaflet of the campaign! And it’s from Reform UK. Who says they have no ground game?

    Is it the free election post, posted and paid for, or hand delivered. They will be mad not to do the former, although it will be interesting to see if they get their act together to address different leaflets to different individuals in the house or just go for 1 leaflet per house. If they do bugger all else I don't know whether they could do a paid for leaflet delivery within expenses. I will be amazed if they can do much hand delivery by activists.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,615

    Nigelb said:
    I am impressed that you posted that before William Glenn did.
    Yes, clearly Trump is serious about pushing for a swift Ukrainian victory. If he said the opposite it would create complacency among Ukraine's European allies and give Russia an opportunity.
    Trump is pushing for a swift Ukranian victory? What brings you to that interpretation?
  • FeersumEnjineeyaFeersumEnjineeya Posts: 4,408

    Second election leaflet of the campaign! And it’s from Reform UK. Who says they have no ground game?

    Just Conservative and Labour leaflets here so far. I think the LDs are taking a back seat in order to give Labour a chance of unseating Andrew Mitchell
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,652
    I am not at all sure Simon Jupp will win in Honiton & Sidmouth. Like Exmouth and Exeter East it is a constituency that is hard to model because part of it was carved out of East Devon, where Claire Wright did very well as an independent. She is backing Richard Foord, the LibDem, and driving from Honiton to Sidmouth yesterday it was endless yellow posters in windows and in gardens. I saw one for Jupp. There could be a shy Tory factor, of course, so DYOR - but this feels like a potential LD gain.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809
    edited June 16

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,581
    Foxy said:

    Nigelb said:
    I am impressed that you posted that before William Glenn did.
    Yes, clearly Trump is serious about pushing for a swift Ukrainian victory. If he said the opposite it would create complacency among Ukraine's European allies and give Russia an opportunity.
    Trump is pushing for a swift Ukranian victory? What brings you to that interpretation?
    What is the effect of his words if not to push European countries to pull their finger out and reduce dependence on the US?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,009
    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,401
    I hope pb is filled with people who are reading these threads and comments, but, although silent, will secretly place a 'X' in the box next to the Conservative candidate regardless on 4th July ;)
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
    Where? I can't find it.
  • Daveyboy1961Daveyboy1961 Posts: 3,883

    I hope pb is filled with people who are reading these threads and comments, but, although silent, will secretly place a 'X' in the box next to the Conservative candidate regardless on 4th July ;)

    :wink:
  • Taz said:

    East Hants a seat I know well. Will probably be a Tory hold but with a significantly reduced majority.

    North Durham, a seat I know well, will probably be a labour hold with an increased majority.
    Are you being a prat again?
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,651

    I hope pb is filled with people who are reading these threads and comments, but, although silent, will secretly place a 'X' in the box next to the Conservative candidate regardless on 4th July ;)

    As a never-CON, it is baffling that people are being demonised for returning to Sunak's Tories. It could be up to 10% of the electorate and bring Sunak silently back up to 30%, and it's good to have this info if one is interested in betting.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,507
    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    When you look at the list of things they are including in their assessments - a lot of which are not likely to be identifiable from maps - you can see wht the Welsh Stasi are using drones.

    One thing I would be interested in knowing is whether they have sorted out the legal basis for this given it is illegal to fly drones close to properties or point cameras at properties from drones without permission from the owner.
  • spudgfshspudgfsh Posts: 1,494
    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    nobody will be brave enough to do it but Council tax needs a complete revaluation exercise as well as a lot more bands.
  • kjhkjh Posts: 11,782
    edited June 16

    ClippP said:

    Are these not Tory MPs and the extent to which they are threatened by a Labour candidate?

    There are several seats on that list where the clear challenge comes from the Lib Dem candidate, I think.

    As an example... North Devon.

    Yep. The list is just the survivors. I have not differentiated the threats.
    Gosh. I agree with @ClippP . If that is a survivors list (of only 72) I am surprised by some it contains. Ones that immediately spring out are Surrey Heath, Tunbridge Wells, North Devon, Maidenhead, Eastleigh, and probably others I have no knowledge of.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,009

    Lots of people giving @Big_G_NorthWales a hard time because he's voting Tory.

    Nasty. Really nasty.

    I had this yesterday from some quarters, despite an explanation which @Heathener and others accepted and it seems that for some discussing your voting intention with the person you have been married to for 60 years is outrageous, but for me we had quite a comprehensive discussion and came to our conclusion as the last thing we want is a Farage led conservative party and it will not prevent Starmer being PM on the 5th July
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809
    edited June 16

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    When you look at the list of things they are including in their assessments - a lot of which are not likely to be identifiable from maps - you can see wht the Welsh Stasi are using drones.

    One thing I would be interested in knowing is whether they have sorted out the legal basis for this given it is illegal to fly drones close to properties or point cameras at properties from drones without permission from the owner.
    Air photography is legal. And there are several free or paid for services. Indeed the OS service is a permanently updated online database rather than discrete map sheets.

  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    I hope pb is filled with people who are reading these threads and comments, but, although silent, will secretly place a 'X' in the box next to the Conservative candidate regardless on 4th July ;)

    Definitely me. I’m just pretending. The record of Tory achievement over the last 14 years speaks for itself. Why wouldn’t anyone vote for more of this milk and honey?
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,507
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
    Where? I can't find it.
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/05/11/welsh-labour-to-hike-council-tax-by-spying-on-homeowners/

    Not sure if this counts as 'widely reported' but the body of the article mentions drones as well as satellites.
  • EPGEPG Posts: 6,651

    Lots of people giving @Big_G_NorthWales a hard time because he's voting Tory.

    Nasty. Really nasty.

    I had this yesterday from some quarters, despite an explanation which @Heathener and others accepted and it seems that for some discussing your voting intention with the person you have been married to for 60 years is outrageous, but for me we had quite a comprehensive discussion and came to our conclusion as the last thing we want is a Farage led conservative party and it will not prevent Starmer being PM on the 5th July
    On the contrary, multiplied by the hundreds of thousands of voters who will do the same, it could bring Sunak back to 31, 32% on the day. Labour down to about 35%, delivering most-seats and a minority government for Sunak and his successor.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,009
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
    Where? I can't find it.
    It may be behind a pay wall

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/05/11/welsh-labour-to-hike-council-tax-by-spying-on-homeowners/
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,639

    I hope pb is filled with people who are reading these threads and comments, but, although silent, will secretly place a 'X' in the box next to the Conservative candidate regardless on 4th July ;)

    Ssssssssh. It is possible that I might vote CON on 4 July but don't tell anyone!

  • pigeonpigeon Posts: 4,837

    There you have it, everyone.

    Various left-wingere cheering Council Tax rises.

    That's what happens if Labour get in.

    A vote for Labour is a vote for your Council Tax bill going up.

    Means have to be found to pay for stuff, or less stuff must be provided. Absent abolition and replacement of Council Tax, one of the low hanging fruit for an incoming Chancellor is to fiddle with the bands within the existing system, and make sure that the occupant of a palace pays somewhat more than three times what's owed on the meanest little broom cupboard bedsit in the same district.

    There's also a good argument for substantially raising the existing 5% cap on annual Council Tax rises and letting authorities impose painful hikes that will allow them to avoid becoming statutory only providers, or slide into outright insolvency. That, or you admit the need for Whitehall to take on the immense burden of social care by centralising its provision or doling out a lot more money in grants.

    The only other choice is to remove the legal obligation to provide social care, and abandon neglected children and the dependent elderly to survive on charity or to rot, in order to save money.

    Have you a better suggestion for how to raise enough money to pay for everything or, alternatively, what not to fund anymore? We've already had a decade and a half of cuts, stagnant or declining real incomes for most people under 65, and repeated economic shocks. There are no easy choices left.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,604
    Sigh.

    A rampaging group of English hooligans have attacked a bar where Serbia supporters were drinking before the Serbia v England game at Euro 2024.

    Report by @danielboffey on a predictably depressing turn of events in Gelsenkirchen.


    https://x.com/SachinNakrani/status/1802351512271700406
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 22,060

    Afternoon folks.

    So one of the reasons for working out this list was to get some insight from the PB brains trust about what direction they think the Parliamentary Tory party might drift/lurch/stagger after the election.

    Whilst some of the obvious RWNs* like Patel and Braverman are still there, it looks like the heart of the ERG faction has been ripped out. Truss, JRM and François are all gone along with dozens of their colleagues.

    But what of those who remain? Any thoughts on direction from looking at that list?

    *Right Wing Nutters

    Oh and thanks for posting TSE.

    What do we have to do to get rid of Christopher Chope? Nuke Christchurch?
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,366
    edited June 16

    Lots of people giving @Big_G_NorthWales a hard time because he's voting Tory.

    Nasty. Really nasty.

    It really hasn't been nasty at all - a bit of gentle teasing, that's all. Most of us have a lot of time for Big G's honesty and have enjoyed his tortuous convolutions to decide what we probably thought he would do all the time.

    It's also the case that anybody on here who publicly announces who they (and their spouse) are going to vote for is inviting comment.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,116
    Good afternoon everyone.

    Thank-you for the header, Mr Tyndall. I'll keep quiet on this, as I'm not especially well informed on the comparatives and superlatives of nuttiness amongst likely rump Conservative MPs.

    I wonder if they would take Lee Anderson back?
  • IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    FF43 said:

    The spread prices from Spreadex/Sporting for the number of seats to be won by each of fhe main parties remain unchanged this morning in the absence of any further polls. Does anyone consider there's any value to had, by buying or selling at these levels?
    Sell Buy
    Labour Seats 428 438
    Conservative Seats 108 116
    Liberal Democrat Seats 53 57
    SNP Seats 19 22
    Reform UK Seats 3.5 5.5

    I'd sell Lib Dem at that level. It's not beyond the realms of possibility but is top end of their targeting approach. I'd probably still buy Tory - suspect the bridge will just about hold when push comes to shove.
    The "safest" Conservative seats will typically fall to the Lib Dems if they go. Getting to 55+ LD seats is the other side of the coin of below 100 seats for Cons.
    My reason, ultimately, for thinking the Tory bridge will hold is that the Lib Dems in particular have been badly burned by over-targeting in recent elections. They will therefore be steered by a fairly risk-averse party HQ away from stretch targets and towards making top targets secure.

    Those stretch targets will then not get the squeeze message as strongly, the Labour vote will be somewhat higher, and the Tories will just about survive on the split. I can see that happening particularly where there are clusters of seats which MRP has as tight Tory/LD contests (Surrey, Oxfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Devon/Somerset/Dorset).

    In essence, Lib Dem HQ would bite your hand off for the 55 seats implied by the spread now and will be very cautious about gambling for more... a gamble which may, but crucially may not, pay off. It's a case of, "we've had a lovely time, Jim, and will let someone else have a go on the prize board".
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?
    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time but iof course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them
    Your commentary here is now of very little value.
    On the contrary. The purpose of this site is betting not Libdem prosletysing.

    Big Gs commentary is very valuable. Take note and bet accordingly (but not necessarily on a Lib Dem Blue Wall Massacre).

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,507
    viewcode said:

    Afternoon folks.

    So one of the reasons for working out this list was to get some insight from the PB brains trust about what direction they think the Parliamentary Tory party might drift/lurch/stagger after the election.

    Whilst some of the obvious RWNs* like Patel and Braverman are still there, it looks like the heart of the ERG faction has been ripped out. Truss, JRM and François are all gone along with dozens of their colleagues.

    But what of those who remain? Any thoughts on direction from looking at that list?

    *Right Wing Nutters

    Oh and thanks for posting TSE.

    What do we have to do to get rid of Christopher Chope? Nuke Christchurch?
    Take off and nuke it from space. Its the only way to be sure. ;)
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809
    edited June 16

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
    Where? I can't find it.
    It may be behind a pay wall

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/05/11/welsh-labour-to-hike-council-tax-by-spying-on-homeowners/
    Can't read i t, but the bit I can see is MAYBE and IN THE FUTURE and SATELLITES which is probably a misunderstanding of Google "Satellite View" (which is taken from aircraft) but could just be the absolutely normal commercial databases which ANY firm can buy if they want, whether taken from aircraft or satellites.

    Edit: have been able to read it on a second try. NO MENTION OF DRONES OR SUCH SPECIFIC INTRUSION. It's all about systematic checking of what is evidently standard general commercial air photography. No dsifferent from looking at the OS map whcih is made by the same means.

    'The Telegraph can now reveal the data that is currently being gathered by the Valuation Office, where officials are building an “automated valuation model” to prepare up-to-date values for all of the 1.5 million homes in Wales.

    As part of this model, they are using “aerial and street view photography” in order to verify the size of houses and gardens.'
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,604
    One thing that isn't discussed enough if the Tories become the official opposition with 72 MPs then democracy is going to struggle.

    Good luck getting a shadow cabinet and shadow junior ministers out of that to hold the government to account.

    Also they will struggle to fill the select committees, several of which the Tories should be chair of.
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    DougSeal said:

    I hope pb is filled with people who are reading these threads and comments, but, although silent, will secretly place a 'X' in the box next to the Conservative candidate regardless on 4th July ;)

    Definitely me. I’m just pretending. The record of Tory achievement over the last 14 years speaks for itself. Why wouldn’t anyone vote for more of this milk and honey?
    Funnily enough that is their new line: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/06/16/voters-must-remember-how-good-under-the-conservatives/

    (By Bill Cash ex-MP)
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,859

    IanB2 said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    Just accept that your credibility here is shot.
    I have no idea why you are taking this so badly, but to be honest no amount of criticism will prevent me posting as honestly as I can and if you do not like it then that is a matter for you

    You’ve made a complete tit of yourself, two elections running. Even the more charitable amongst us can see that, very clearly.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,009
    DougSeal said:

    There you have it, everyone.

    Various left-wingere cheering Council Tax rises.

    That's what happens if Labour get in.

    A vote for Labour is a vote for your Council Tax bill going up.

    Are you fucking kidding???? Do you know how much my council tax has gone up under the Tories at a local and national level?!??!!! Have you any idea how shit the public services we get in Kent in return? Yes, council tax will go up under Labour, but it has gone up and will go up under the Tories too. At least Labour are not denying it.

    And I’m not cheering more council tax. I’m saying it is a regrettable necessity given many years of utter Tory mismanagement and waste.
    I think the issue is the extension of the number of bands which was the flaw in the original implementation and it is a fact that million pound homes just 500 yards from us are only paying one band higher

    Wales Labour has hammered Council tax at 5% for years and more recently at plus 10.1% and 9.77% this year
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,926

    One thing that isn't discussed enough if the Tories become the official opposition with 72 MPs then democracy is going to struggle.

    Good luck getting a shadow cabinet and shadow junior ministers out of that to hold the government to account.

    Also they will struggle to fill the select committees, several of which the Tories should be chair of.

    Yes, in the interests of democracy the Tories’ tally should be topped up to 200, at a minimum.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,950
    edited June 16
    MattW said:

    Good afternoon everyone.

    Thank-you for the header, Mr Tyndall. I'll keep quiet on this, as I'm not especially well informed on the comparatives and superlatives of nuttiness amongst likely rump Conservative MPs.

    I wonder if they would take Lee Anderson back?

    Labour or Conservative?

    ‘We are a big tent..’
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,507
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    When you look at the list of things they are including in their assessments - a lot of which are not likely to be identifiable from maps - you can see wht the Welsh Stasi are using drones.

    One thing I would be interested in knowing is whether they have sorted out the legal basis for this given it is illegal to fly drones close to properties or point cameras at properties from drones without permission from the owner.
    Air photography is legal. And there are several free or paid for services. Indeed the OS service is a permanently updated online database rather than discrete map sheets.

    Indeed. But the rules behind drone usage are extremely tight as I know from using them for archaeology. If I want to do a building survey for example I have to make sure I have the written permission from all neighbouring porperties which might be imaged in the survey.

    There are lots of obvious reasons for all of this. The use of drones for spying on people in their own homes for sordid purposes is a real thing and something that causes lots of complaints to the police.
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208
    edited June 16

    Foxy said:

    Nigelb said:
    I am impressed that you posted that before William Glenn did.
    Yes, clearly Trump is serious about pushing for a swift Ukrainian victory. If he said the opposite it would create complacency among Ukraine's European allies and give Russia an opportunity.
    Trump is pushing for a swift Ukranian victory? What brings you to that interpretation?
    What is the effect of his words if not to push European countries to pull their finger out and reduce dependence on the US?
    An alternative theory suggests Trump is a humongous turd who will do his best to see Ukraine defeated. This is to return the favour to his friend Vladimir for his help in subverting the American political system to Trump's personal benefit.
  • The_WoodpeckerThe_Woodpecker Posts: 457

    I hope pb is filled with people who are reading these threads and comments, but, although silent, will secretly place a 'X' in the box next to the Conservative candidate regardless on 4th July ;)

    Maybe, or more likely your unhinged ranting will put them off.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
    Where? I can't find it.
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/05/11/welsh-labour-to-hike-council-tax-by-spying-on-homeowners/

    Not sure if this counts as 'widely reported' but the body of the article mentions drones as well as satellites.
    Thanks, but I can't find it oin reading or on a word search - even singular drone.
  • MonksfieldMonksfield Posts: 2,806
    EPG said:

    Lots of people giving @Big_G_NorthWales a hard time because he's voting Tory.

    Nasty. Really nasty.

    I had this yesterday from some quarters, despite an explanation which @Heathener and others accepted and it seems that for some discussing your voting intention with the person you have been married to for 60 years is outrageous, but for me we had quite a comprehensive discussion and came to our conclusion as the last thing we want is a Farage led conservative party and it will not prevent Starmer being PM on the 5th July
    On the contrary, multiplied by the hundreds of thousands of voters who will do the same, it could bring Sunak back to 31, 32% on the day. Labour down to about 35%, delivering most-seats and a minority government for Sunak and his successor.
    Oh yes, I’d love to see Sunak form a minority Govt. Just for the absolute Lolz.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,604
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    Just accept that your credibility here is shot.
    I have no idea why you are taking this so badly, but to be honest no amount of criticism will prevent me posting as honestly as I can and if you do not like it then that is a matter for you

    You’ve made a complete tit of yourself, two elections running. Even the more charitable amongst us can see that, very clearly.
    I wonder how they are going to cope with the revelation that every Post Office Minister since 2015 has been a Tory and it was the Tories who gave Paula Vennells a gong.
  • I hope pb is filled with people who are reading these threads and comments, but, although silent, will secretly place a 'X' in the box next to the Conservative candidate regardless on 4th July ;)

    Not on your Nelly.

    We have a dripping wet centrist candidate in our constituency.

    Were it someone like Mogg, then I might but so determined am I for Onenation Delenda Est, I will vote tactically for Labour while holding my nose if it comes to it.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 27,846

    One thing that isn't discussed enough if the Tories become the official opposition with 72 MPs then democracy is going to struggle.

    Good luck getting a shadow cabinet and shadow junior ministers out of that to hold the government to account.

    Also they will struggle to fill the select committees, several of which the Tories should be chair of.

    Otoh the ideal chance for Conservative talent to rise, ready for the next but one leadership contest.
  • FairlieredFairliered Posts: 4,930
    edited June 16
    maxh said:

    IanB2 said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    Just accept that your credibility here is shot.
    This is unpleasant Ian. Whilst it might be natural to have taken Big G's initial claim that he was going to vote Lib Dem with a pinch of salt, there's no reason to pile on him for changing his mind. His reasoning is sound.
    Last time I looked, we were still a democracy, which means that everyone can vote for whoever they like, and can change their mind whenever they like. If they didn’t, democracy wouldn’t exist.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,116
    edited June 16
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
    Where? I can't find it.
    It may be behind a pay wall

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/05/11/welsh-labour-to-hike-council-tax-by-spying-on-homeowners/
    Can't read i t, but the bit I can see is MAYBE and IN THE FUTURE and SATELLITES which is probably a misunderstanding of Google "Satellite View" (which is taken from aircraft) but could just be the absolutely normal commercial databases which ANY firm can buy if they want, whether taken from aircraft or satellites.

    Edit: have been able to read it on a second try. NO MENTION OF DRONES OR SUCH SPECIFIC INTRUSION. It's all about systematic checking of what is evidently standard general commercial air photography. No dsifferent from looking at the OS map whcih is made by the same means.

    'The Telegraph can now reveal the data that is currently being gathered by the Valuation Office, where officials are building an “automated valuation model” to prepare up-to-date values for all of the 1.5 million homes in Wales.

    As part of this model, they are using “aerial and street view photography” in order to verify the size of houses and gardens.'
    The Telegraph have designed their paywall to be leaky, which I take as presumed consent.
    https://archive.ph/frA7c
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    When you look at the list of things they are including in their assessments - a lot of which are not likely to be identifiable from maps - you can see wht the Welsh Stasi are using drones.

    One thing I would be interested in knowing is whether they have sorted out the legal basis for this given it is illegal to fly drones close to properties or point cameras at properties from drones without permission from the owner.
    Air photography is legal. And there are several free or paid for services. Indeed the OS service is a permanently updated online database rather than discrete map sheets.

    Indeed. But the rules behind drone usage are extremely tight as I know from using them for archaeology. If I want to do a building survey for example I have to make sure I have the written permission from all neighbouring porperties which might be imaged in the survey.

    There are lots of obvious reasons for all of this. The use of drones for spying on people in their own homes for sordid purposes is a real thing and something that causes lots of complaints to the police.
    But the Welsh Gmt doesn't even need to use drones. Reread the article.

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,507
    IanB2 said:

    IanB2 said:

    FPT

    IanB2 said:
    » show previous quotes
    The LibDems are alive to the fact that despite the likes of Big_G spending six months wasting our time reading his daily posts about how he wasn’t going to vote Tory, just like he did throughout 2019, Mrs_G had him down as a Tory voter from the start, and clearly she’s the one that gets to fill in their ballot papers.

    And people here have the cheek to make caustic comments about postal votes in Tower Hamlets!

    Can we give Mrs_G an account here?

    Big_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,971

    I am saddened that you have taken my wife and my decision to vote for the conservative in our postal vote despite an explanation of the thought and reasons and no doubt you do not like that my wife considers Davey a ' clown' and is unimpressed with his antics and his role in the PO enquiry not least as she was a customer of Alan Bates

    You twist around on 2019 but fail to recognise I did not vote for Johnson as leader and I did have a vote as I was a member at the time, but of course I voted for the party v Corbyn

    You need to understand that my wife and I utterly condemn Farage and it is important for all conservatives who want a one nation party to support the party on the 4th July to ensure the total numbers of votes exceed Reform

    My explanation was endorsed by @Heathener and others on here so maybe you need to accept that in some families, and especially mine where my wife and I have just celebrated 60 years of marriage , that we do discuss issues and decide together how we deal with them

    Just accept that your credibility here is shot.
    I have no idea why you are taking this so badly, but to be honest no amount of criticism will prevent me posting as honestly as I can and if you do not like it then that is a matter for you

    You’ve made a complete tit of yourself, two elections running. Even the more charitable amongst us can see that, very clearly.
    Not sure why you are taking such an obnoxious line over this mate. It is not your normal style. I fear you might have caught Casino's malady.
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,743

    There you have it, everyone.

    Various left-wingere cheering Council Tax rises.

    That's what happens if Labour get in.

    A vote for Labour is a vote for your Council Tax bill going up.

    Is that an official Conservative Party slogan, or one that you made at home out of washing up liquid containers and sticky-back plastic?
  • TweedledeeTweedledee Posts: 1,405
    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
    Where? I can't find it.
    It may be behind a pay wall

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/05/11/welsh-labour-to-hike-council-tax-by-spying-on-homeowners/
    Can't read i t, but the bit I can see is MAYBE and IN THE FUTURE and SATELLITES which is probably a misunderstanding of Google "Satellite View" (which is taken from aircraft) but could just be the absolutely normal commercial databases which ANY firm can buy if they want, whether taken from aircraft or satellites.

    Edit: have been able to read it on a second try. NO MENTION OF DRONES OR SUCH SPECIFIC INTRUSION. It's all about systematic checking of what is evidently standard general commercial air photography. No dsifferent from looking at the OS map whcih is made by the same means.

    'The Telegraph can now reveal the data that is currently being gathered by the Valuation Office, where officials are building an “automated valuation model” to prepare up-to-date values for all of the 1.5 million homes in Wales.

    As part of this model, they are using “aerial and street view photography” in order to verify the size of houses and gardens.'
    https://support.google.com/earth/answer/6327779?hl=en&sjid=11467124086915838879-EU

    Says it's a mix of satellite and plane and the odd drone and balloon
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264

    One thing that isn't discussed enough if the Tories become the official opposition with 72 MPs then democracy is going to struggle.

    Good luck getting a shadow cabinet and shadow junior ministers out of that to hold the government to account.

    Also they will struggle to fill the select committees, several of which the Tories should be chair of.

    And they're struggling just on seat count - when you actually look at the list a large amount of them are far over the hill and should not not be involved in front line politics or just a bit too woo woo for this decade. Then throw in the vicious power struggle between the various sub groups that will break out.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,581
    FF43 said:

    Foxy said:

    Nigelb said:
    I am impressed that you posted that before William Glenn did.
    Yes, clearly Trump is serious about pushing for a swift Ukrainian victory. If he said the opposite it would create complacency among Ukraine's European allies and give Russia an opportunity.
    Trump is pushing for a swift Ukranian victory? What brings you to that interpretation?
    What is the effect of his words if not to push European countries to pull their finger out and reduce dependence on the US?
    An alternative theory suggests Trump is a humongous turd who will do his best to see Ukraine defeated. This is to return the favour to his friend Vladimir for his help in subverting the American political system to Trump's personal benefit.
    You mean a conspiracy theory?
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 122,874
    edited June 16
    kjh said:

    ClippP said:

    Are these not Tory MPs and the extent to which they are threatened by a Labour candidate?

    There are several seats on that list where the clear challenge comes from the Lib Dem candidate, I think.

    As an example... North Devon.

    Yep. The list is just the survivors. I have not differentiated the threats.
    Gosh. I agree with @ClippP . If that is a survivors list (of only 72) I am surprised by some it contains. Ones that immediately spring out are Surrey Heath, Tunbridge Wells, North Devon, Maidenhead, Eastleigh, and probably others I have no knowledge of.
    All LD target seats, those are the types of largely bluewall seats Rishi probably saves for the Tories (as well as Chelsea and Fulham where Hands projected to cling on), had Boris and Truss still been Conservative leader they would likely have gone yellow.

    Albeit a number of redwall and Leave seats Boris would have held will go Labour under Rishi
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,809
    edited June 16

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    Carnyx said:

    The introduction of more council tax bands would not be a total surprise and it might be our fault. PB has previously discussed the much higher property taxes in the land of the free, and the difficulty of taking expensive homes out of the country.
    Council tax was flawed from it's introduction as it did not have enough and fairer higher ranges

    I actually support extending the ranges and at present the Welsh Labour government are proceeding with just that and using drones to assess people's land and gardens

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cglp252kyj0o
    Drones?! They don't need to do that with the Ordnance Survey mapping service and Google/Bing websites plus Land Registry!

    I'd think it's only needed if there is some information laid about very recent developments.
    It is widely reported they are using drones
    Where? I can't find it.
    It may be behind a pay wall

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2024/05/11/welsh-labour-to-hike-council-tax-by-spying-on-homeowners/
    Can't read i t, but the bit I can see is MAYBE and IN THE FUTURE and SATELLITES which is probably a misunderstanding of Google "Satellite View" (which is taken from aircraft) but could just be the absolutely normal commercial databases which ANY firm can buy if they want, whether taken from aircraft or satellites.

    Edit: have been able to read it on a second try. NO MENTION OF DRONES OR SUCH SPECIFIC INTRUSION. It's all about systematic checking of what is evidently standard general commercial air photography. No dsifferent from looking at the OS map whcih is made by the same means.

    'The Telegraph can now reveal the data that is currently being gathered by the Valuation Office, where officials are building an “automated valuation model” to prepare up-to-date values for all of the 1.5 million homes in Wales.

    As part of this model, they are using “aerial and street view photography” in order to verify the size of houses and gardens.'
    https://support.google.com/earth/answer/6327779?hl=en&sjid=11467124086915838879-EU

    Says it's a mix of satellite and plane and the odd drone and balloon
    Doesn't even mention drones or balloons. And that isn't the Welsh Gmt doing the photography. I think someone's been winding Big G up.
  • ChameleonChameleon Posts: 4,264
    edited June 16
    Could be worse for the Tories - Trudeau on for 4th, with a successionist party as the head of HM's most loyal oppo.

    https://x.com/RealAlbanianPat/status/1802330370492231765

    What is it about extremely high and incongruous migration, NIMBYism, and unprecedented housing, rental, and tax hikes that voters don't like?
This discussion has been closed.