Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

When political betting can get you into trouble – politicalbetting.com

15791011

Comments

  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,491
    Heathener said:

    64% to 36% to Starmer

    Wow. What a poll?
    Like last week, Still got to give it a day or so to make further estimation of what just went on.

    I stand by Starmer wafferly, doesn’t give clear answers, and when in a spot reaches for weird things.

    But Sunak was so lacking fight, you can see tonight this playing into Farages hands, polling crossover, and bizarre election result.
  • TweedledeeTweedledee Posts: 1,405
    Heathener said:

    I can’t see how anyone but the most rigged boxing judge could give the split to Sunak

    That looks at first sight like English, but fails to make sense. Decisions and adjudications are rigged, not the people making them, and a single judge can't "give the split" one way or the other.
  • That is end days polling for Sunak.

    That drop in Labour's polling doesn't pass the smell test yet.

    Why do you say that? It’s been a drop in most recent polls.
    Feels a lot like the initial JL Poll where it went down to 12 points.

    We need another week or so of polling to see if it's a real trend.

    IMHO, Labour is still around 40-43 points.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479
    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    He only needs to lose a debate by a 2-1 margin?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,691
    Heathener said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    Glad I haven’t totally lost the plot. That’s about how I’d give it too.
    Sunak looked defeated and low wattage most of the time.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,232
    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    Yes, I agree with you and with @Sean_F

    Carrie was a turning point, and I concur with Sean F’s three points. The Tories need to die, now
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,491
    edited June 12
    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    It doesn’t read across to Genny Lec result 😂
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,344
    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    On defence and justice, Cameron and Osborne share the blame. Both men decided that the public don’t care about these issues.

    On border control, that’s on Boris and his successors.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479

    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    It doesn’t read across to Genny Lec result 😂

    Aaaaargh! Stop it. Please!
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,691

    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651

    This "Sunak is a defeated man" thing. We picked up on it. Sam Coates picked up on it. The audience are picking up on it.

    This could utterly demolish him for the last 3 weeks. The joy / sorrow of politics is the herd mentality. When the tide goes out it sucks things along with it...

    I'd like to think so Rochdale but... it's the hope that gets you.

    (To clarify, I have no wish to see Sunak demolished as a person, but as leader of his party - and his party with him)

  • John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    John still doesn't seem to understand that Labour cannot just offer whatever people ask. As Tony Blair said, the strength for a Labour leader is to say "no". Saying yes is easy.
  • MoonRabbitMoonRabbit Posts: 13,491

    Wes Streeting is a class act. Incredibly talented communicator.

    It was Cleverley’s fault for mentioning the 2K Lie. Its a Lie so toxic now it should be cordoned off by security forces - DO NOT ENTER
    Yes, Wes was just creasing up at that stage. Actually lolling.

    Gentlemenly handshake offered by James at the end though. A classy touch.
    Mercer grabbed Wes into neck lock and dragged him off screen, in last weeks spin room.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,937

    Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    The problem is, the alternative wasn't the status quo - it would have been interpreted as a full throated mandate for further integration and greater loss of sovereignty, probably the Euro without a referendum etc.

    There are plenty of people like Turbo above, who 'wanted the integration of the single market without the bullshit politics' but that was never an option.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,392

    Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    Did you read what I posted? I voted remain. I’d rather we hadn’t brexited. I think we are where we are though, and the rejoin polling is false (as the terms would never be what we left on).
  • DM_AndyDM_Andy Posts: 1,127


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    I thought it was going to be in the manifesto but with a 'when the economic position allows' aspiration more than policy. Is it not going to be in there at all?

  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 42,812
    Farooq said:


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    John still doesn't seem to understand that Labour cannot just offer whatever people ask. As Tony Blair said, the strength for a Labour leader is to say "no". Saying yes is easy.
    Yes
    Aye, richt.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479
    Daily Mail journalist says audience were contemptuous of Sunak. Gives Starmer the win.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 81,968
    edited June 12
    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,814

    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    It doesn’t read across to Genny Lec result 😂
    Moony Rab :lol:
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651
    Leon said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    Yes, I agree with you and with @Sean_F

    Carrie was a turning point, and I concur with Sean F’s three points. The Tories need to die, now
    There are a lot of good books to be written about the 2019 - 2024 administration (and no doubt quite a few bad ones too).
  • bigglesbiggles Posts: 6,047
    edited June 12

    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    He only needs to lose a debate by a 2-1 margin?
    He only needs to get a decent chunk of 36% of voters to think he’s worth their vote….

    The rest don’t matter to him.

    His only strategy now is to eat into Reform and hope Labour dips a bit more.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,344

    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.

    Sunak would have run away, useless coward that he is.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 51,592
    Leon said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    Yes, I agree with you and with @Sean_F

    Carrie was a turning point, and I concur with Sean F’s three points. The Tories need to die, now
    I’d never thought of it this way before but without Covid, the Cummings/Johnson team would have lasted longer and would have had more chance to show results.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,691
    nico679 said:

    Given Starmers dodgy start where Beth really gave him both barrels I think he managed to hold it together and in the audience section he looked much more in touch with the public .

    I find Sunak deeply disingenuous and that look he gives really grates .

    Like a lot of spreadsheet obsessives he has a tetchy side that comes across a lot as he kind of sighs 'look, why don't you understand, the numbers say this...'
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208

    Unpopular said:

    Here we go, Suck Here private school killer.

    Rubbish answer, Starmer. He doesn’t get it.

    Individual and State socialism.
    I'm a few minutes behind now, but Starmer seems to be connecting well with the general public. He seems to be dealing with the VAT question pretty well and, sensitively.
    His politics just doesn’t understand aspiration though, does it. State or nothing.
    I disagree. Starmer is saying people at state schools can be aspirational too. And implies probably more so than non VAT paying private school students who are mostly locking in privilege.

    It's a thoughtful answer and I think he wins on the aspiration question, regardless of whether this is a sensible tax
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,895

    This "Sunak is a defeated man" thing. We picked up on it. Sam Coates picked up on it. The audience are picking up on it.

    This could utterly demolish him for the last 3 weeks. The joy / sorrow of politics is the herd mentality. When the tide goes out it sucks things along with it...

    I'd like to think so Rochdale but... it's the hope that gets you.

    (To clarify, I have no wish to see Sunak demolished as a person, but as leader of his party - and his party with him)
    Remember that my dad was a toolmaker I've met Rishi and liked him. He personally will be the opposite of demolished. A global figure, married to a billionaire, with a PM's pension, and a mega job in California.
  • Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    Did you read what I posted? I voted remain. I’d rather we hadn’t brexited. I think we are where we are though, and the rejoin polling is false (as the terms would never be what we left on).
    Even if you voted remain you can still ask if it was worth it.

    I voted remain and don't think it was worth leaving.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,232
    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    No, I’m not. Because I’m not a Labour supporter. I’m a former Lib Dem member who was roundly decried on here for quitting in a huff. Get off the board, the internet, in fact the fucking planet. Read what other people are saying rather than spending all day in a self congratulatory cock polishing session.
    Er, I’ve been working hard all morning making flints and then spent the afternoon walking around the moody old Jewish quarters of Odessa, famed from Isaac Babel’s wonderful short stories

    Now I sit here waiting for the first of Putin’s Persian drones and Iskander missiles; he always attacks at night, It’s like the African Savannah, the predators roam nocturnally, and we are the prey, the zebras and gazelles, eyes bright and wide and fearful, in the moonlight of the wilds
    I can't help viewing this exchange in the light of the few minutes of debate that I just watched. Doug, the angry audience member. You with your impalpable waffle, impervious to the fact that three quarters of the people reading your words think you're swine.

    You are Rishi Sunak.
    No, I’m a professional artist and writer who is being paid to be in Odessa, magical Odessa, during a war! - and you are a fuck up stuck in a bedsit in drizzly Aberdeen, and that sends you - and several other PB-ers - absolutely insane with badly disguised jealousy. Which I gleefully stoke
    Hey, I didn't say I was in the three quarters, Rishi. I'm actually a huge fan.
    I do wish you'd tone it down with romanticising war, though. I know after a few glasses you like lurching to rag-time tunes but it makes you seem like a bit of a ghoul.
    Personal question. Do you have aspirations to be a writer? I sense that maybe you do

    I rather liked your limerick earlier on, it’s hard to nail a limerick, and you did
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,826

    Well this has been brutal for Sunak. And the really sad thing is that he really genuinely seems to believe he is doing a great job.

    I wouldn't say he's done a great job but I don't think he's done a particularly bad job either.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,411

    Why do all of Matthew Goodwin's videos have this stupid background music.

    He's one of those "how do you do fellow kids" people, who just looks a prat. Muppet.

    You do seem to talk about him an awful lot.
    Do you care?
    Enough to observe it.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,013

    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.

    D day has taken any energy for the campaign out of him

    I do begin to fear for his mental health, and sure he will be relieved to see 5th July and pass over to Starmer

    The only question now is just why Labour's poll ratings are falling and will they stabilise
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651

    ...


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    I'm with John on this.
    I've got to say that it's not a benefit issue that comes up much in my experience. The bedroom tax is worse but much worse still is the evil and inept approach taken to make people jump through hoops to review their disability benefits every few years, including people with conditions that only a biblical miracle would improve.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479
    biggles said:

    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    He only needs to lose a debate by a 2-1 margin?
    He only needs to get a decent chunk of 36% of voters to think he’s worth their vote….

    The rest don’t matter to him.

    His only strategy now is to eat into Reform and hope Labour dips a bit more.
    Eh? Just because 64% said Starmer won doesn’t mean 64% will vote for him!
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,077
    Carnyx said:

    Cicero said:

    Cicero said:

    Sunak repeats the weird line about being "the best country in the world to be a veteran".

    It is so outrageously, demonstrably untrue it is utterly contemptible. The way we treat our ex-servicemen is beyond evil. Fo this absurd lie alone, Sunak should face obliteration.
    Beyond evil? A touch hyperbolic! What is it that has you so riled up?
    Seeing how ex-serviceman have actually been treated. Homeless, untreated PTSD, ignored by welfare, all the old veteren networks shut down... the list is long. Then this utter twat says how great everything is... words fail me.
    The specialist services hospitals closed. Only very partly remedied since.
    It's a long list indeed
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,060


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    LDs and Green are pledging to scrap it, is it so popular Keir does not want to risk including it?
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,950
    edited June 12

    This "Sunak is a defeated man" thing. We picked up on it. Sam Coates picked up on it. The audience are picking up on it.

    This could utterly demolish him for the last 3 weeks. The joy / sorrow of politics is the herd mentality. When the tide goes out it sucks things along with it...

    I'd like to think so Rochdale but... it's the hope that gets you.

    (To clarify, I have no wish to see Sunak demolished as a person, but as leader of his party - and his party with him)
    Remember that my dad was a toolmaker I've met Rishi and liked him. He personally will be the opposite of demolished. A global figure, married to a billionaire, with a PM's pension, and a mega job in California.
    Istr he gave you the horn. Has the reek of political failure diminished his fanciability?
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398
    edited June 12
    Heathener said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    What kind of numbers do you think Labour could drift out too, and (presumably) the Tories gain, to bring the majority into question?

    I'm sure if we Baxter them it will still bring a sizeable Labour majority
    Playing around on Baxter I get Labour falling short of a majority on poll shares (and seats) of:

    CON 25% (226)
    LAB 30% (321)
    LDM 15% (56)
    RFM 17% (4)
    GRN 8% (3)

    We're some distance from that, but the interesting thing about that scenario is that it doesn't require any particular Tory recovery. They only have to get around what their best current poll scores give them (25% with Savanta and More in Common). It then only requires Labour to fail to squeeze the Greens, and to lose a few more soft voters to LDM/RFM/GRN on the basis that they're inevitably going to win by a huge margin, and then to have been somewhat overdone in the polls by a bit.

    It's a much more plausible route to a Hung Parliament than a Tory recovery to >30%.
    Yes, for me the worst scenario for Labour would be a 2005 style lack of enthusiasm depressing their vote, but with the other parties doing just a bit better and denying them a majority.
    I mentioned earlier today that this talk of a ’SuperMajority' is the first smart thing the Conservatives have done all campaign.

    It’s very dangerous for Labour.
    The supermajority fear was one I have been toying with for a while. I would prefer Starmer to win but don't want Labour to have a massive majority. The blair experience is quite instructive.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404
    Sean_F said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    On defence and justice, Cameron and Osborne share the blame. Both men decided that the public don’t care about these issues.

    On border control, that’s on Boris and his successors.
    I think they all took the lesson that politics can be entirely cynical from Tony Blair.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,411

    ...


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    I'm with John on this.
    Suella Braverman is too. And so am I.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,232

    Leon said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    Yes, I agree with you and with @Sean_F

    Carrie was a turning point, and I concur with Sean F’s three points. The Tories need to die, now
    I’d never thought of it this way before but without Covid, the Cummings/Johnson team would have lasted longer and would have had more chance to show results.
    Cummings had an actual post-Brexit plan. Parts of it may have been mad, and maybe he was the wrong guy to deliver it, even from the back room, but it was a plan and it was coherent - deregulate, level up, restrict immigration to highly skilled, focus on technology and destroy the Woke blob that stops everything and slows everything else. But Boris is led by his dick and fell for Carrie and got distracted and then came Covid and the war. It’s a tragedy, really. Boris had the political rizz and Cummings had the brains - it might just have worked

    instead the Tories lie in ruins and the rubble needs to be cleared away, so we can start again
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,937
    Carnyx said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    Frankly while they enjoy a gap of over 20% over their nearest rival they won’t be particularly perturbed.

    If the Tories pulled it back a little and we saw something like 38/28 then yes there would be a need to worry.

    Or if Farage does manage his leapfrog and you get Ref in the mid 20s. Baxter thinks Ref have to be getting into the high 20s before they start winning a significant number of seats - in actuality, given their vote is quite concentrated in certain areas a score like that would start really throwing up some wacky results all over the place and I suspect net them a decent haul.
    Farage is the wildcard in this election. If immigration is your #1 issue, he reaches the parts that neither Con nor Lab can reach. And he is reaching it, no doubt about that.

    Fwiw a friend in the red trouser brigade messaged me yesterday unprompted to point out that Farage was the 'last hope for this country after the Conservatives let us all down', which surprised me a bit, as I assumed he appealed more to your red wall gammonite than your bufton tufton type.

    There's a world of difference in the size of the Labour majority depending on if the Farage-gasm is happening in Lab or Con targets.
    11th Hussars?
    Said acquaintance's main hobby is shooting. He's never told me whether he means clay pigeons, real ones, or people. I choose not to enquire tbh.

    I found it odd that he gave me the party political on behalf of the Faragista party as he doesn't usually discuss politics with me, and certainly never unprompted. I suggested if he was a Faragist perhaps he should move to Jaywick and live in a trailer home... no reply, unsurprisingly.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404
    Sean_F said:

    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.

    Sunak would have run away, useless coward that he is.
    I think people, now, will be voting Conservative despite him not because of him.

    I don't think he should be allowed to make a single decision for the next 4 weeks without running it past Hague and/or Cameron.
  • chrisbchrisb Posts: 114
    Nigelb said:

    tlg86 said:

    https://x.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1800979730335961512

    Guido Fawkes @GuidoFawkes
    Total bullshit story. Section 42 definition of "Cheating" as per the Gambling Act applies when you nobble a horse, bribe a croupier or mark cards not when you have inside information that your bet is a dead certainty. It requires interference to be a crime.

    Guido has the political antennae of a moth that's had a close encounter with a Bunsen burner.
    He's also wrong on his substantive point: s.42(3) of the act makes it clear that interference is not required for an offence to have occurred.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651

    This "Sunak is a defeated man" thing. We picked up on it. Sam Coates picked up on it. The audience are picking up on it.

    This could utterly demolish him for the last 3 weeks. The joy / sorrow of politics is the herd mentality. When the tide goes out it sucks things along with it...

    I'd like to think so Rochdale but... it's the hope that gets you.

    (To clarify, I have no wish to see Sunak demolished as a person, but as leader of his party - and his party with him)
    Remember that my dad was a toolmaker I've met Rishi and liked him. He personally will be the opposite of demolished. A global figure, married to a billionaire, with a PM's pension, and a mega job in California.
    Good point. What a bastard, eh?

    Btw, I can't believe that Starmer let slip that his father was a toolmaker, I though that was a big secret. Seriously, someone on his team needs to have a word. Or is it becoming a bit of a positive meme now?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,392

    Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    Did you read what I posted? I voted remain. I’d rather we hadn’t brexited. I think we are where we are though, and the rejoin polling is false (as the terms would never be what we left on).
    Even if you voted remain you can still ask if it was worth it.

    I voted remain and don't think it was worth leaving.
    I think a lot of what happened was a result of the way successive governments failed to give the people a say on European integration. All other members of the EU used referenda to ensure buy in with important steps such as Lisbon. But not for the Brits, oh no. They never trusted the public enough, or that they could make the case well enough. And so when the chance to have their say came round, a lot just said ‘feck you’. So in one sense finally having a vote was worth it, even if the outcome has been poor. And if it has shifted opinions since and makes people realise that maybe being in the EU or even just as closely aligned as possible, then that’s also a good thing.

    So basically, I think that yes, it was worth it. It’s also likely to give Labour its biggest win and a chance to try to mend the country, so that’s a plus too.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404
    ukelect said:

    The latest UK-Elect prediction is now out at https://www.ukelect.co.uk/HTML/forecasts/20240612ForecastUK.html

    It takes account of recent polling changes and is also now based on the final candidates list. It shows Lab 403, Con 172, LD34, SNP 18 (a Lab majority of 158).

    Cons a big buy, if you're right.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,814
    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    No, I’m not. Because I’m not a Labour supporter. I’m a former Lib Dem member who was roundly decried on here for quitting in a huff. Get off the board, the internet, in fact the fucking planet. Read what other people are saying rather than spending all day in a self congratulatory cock polishing session.
    Er, I’ve been working hard all morning making flints and then spent the afternoon walking around the moody old Jewish quarters of Odessa, famed from Isaac Babel’s wonderful short stories

    Now I sit here waiting for the first of Putin’s Persian drones and Iskander missiles; he always attacks at night, It’s like the African Savannah, the predators roam nocturnally, and we are the prey, the zebras and gazelles, eyes bright and wide and fearful, in the moonlight of the wilds
    I can't help viewing this exchange in the light of the few minutes of debate that I just watched. Doug, the angry audience member. You with your impalpable waffle, impervious to the fact that three quarters of the people reading your words think you're swine.

    You are Rishi Sunak.
    No, I’m a professional artist and writer who is being paid to be in Odessa, magical Odessa, during a war! - and you are a fuck up stuck in a bedsit in drizzly Aberdeen, and that sends you - and several other PB-ers - absolutely insane with badly disguised jealousy. Which I gleefully stoke
    Hey, I didn't say I was in the three quarters, Rishi. I'm actually a huge fan.
    I do wish you'd tone it down with romanticising war, though. I know after a few glasses you like lurching to rag-time tunes but it makes you seem like a bit of a ghoul.
    Personal question. Do you have aspirations to be a writer? I sense that maybe you do

    I rather liked your limerick earlier on, it’s hard to nail a limerick, and you did
    There was a young man called Farage
    Who one day got locked in his garage
    He campaigned so hard
    But let down his guard
    And fell to an electoral barrage.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 63,013

    biggles said:

    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    He only needs to lose a debate by a 2-1 margin?
    He only needs to get a decent chunk of 36% of voters to think he’s worth their vote….

    The rest don’t matter to him.

    His only strategy now is to eat into Reform and hope Labour dips a bit more.
    Eh? Just because 64% said Starmer won doesn’t mean 64% will vote for him!
    The woman who heckled Sunak, and interrupted his answers, when interviewed post the debate said that neither Sunak or Starmer understand the NHS and I would suggest NOA would have won the debate

    There is an awful lot of cynicism out there
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,344

    Sean_F said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    On defence and justice, Cameron and Osborne share the blame. Both men decided that the public don’t care about these issues.

    On border control, that’s on Boris and his successors.
    I think they all took the lesson that politics can be entirely cynical from Tony Blair.
    They took all the wrong lessons from New Labour, and failed to appreciate that the post 2008 world is a very different place to the pre 2008 world.

    Ours is in age of blood and iron.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,060
    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    Yes, I agree with you and with @Sean_F

    Carrie was a turning point, and I concur with Sean F’s three points. The Tories need to die, now
    There are a lot of good books to be written about the 2019 - 2024 administration (and no doubt quite a few bad ones too).
    FWIW I think the the analyses around 2021/2022 are wrong. Boris melted all the glue away from his party pretty much immediately. The only thing keeping the Tories together was external pressure: Brexit, then Covid. As soon as the pressure from those lifted they flew apart. I don't think there's anything anyone could have done. Boris fucked the party in 2019. It just took a wee while for the first rash to appear.
    I don't think this level of loss was inevitable.

    That Boris was ousted at all when he should have been untouchable after a big win is proof itself that things were cracking pretty badly, it didn't happen in a vaccuum. They were going to face some major pressures and probably lose a lot of seats, but could a win have occurred? I think it could have.

    The cack handed manner of the ousting resulting in the Truss-Sunak switcharound destroyed them. From that point on no argument based on competence or stability was possible.

    Sunak doing a bad job thereafter just compounded things.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    No, I’m not. Because I’m not a Labour supporter. I’m a former Lib Dem member who was roundly decried on here for quitting in a huff. Get off the board, the internet, in fact the fucking planet. Read what other people are saying rather than spending all day in a self congratulatory cock polishing session.
    Er, I’ve been working hard all morning making flints and then spent the afternoon walking around the moody old Jewish quarters of Odessa, famed from Isaac Babel’s wonderful short stories

    Now I sit here waiting for the first of Putin’s Persian drones and Iskander missiles; he always attacks at night, It’s like the African Savannah, the predators roam nocturnally, and we are the prey, the zebras and gazelles, eyes bright and wide and fearful, in the moonlight of the wilds
    Impressive that you manage do that while still making time for constant self-husbanding over that picture of yourself in your magazine showing the aftermath of you covering your face in glue before rubbing it in the bin of a Brazilian waxing salon. Have a shave you bearded failure.
  • PedestrianRockPedestrianRock Posts: 580
    Child Benefit cap removal makes sense but Starmer is just trying to avoid "Labour puts benefits up!!!!!" headlines - I imagine they'll ditch the cap fairly quickly post election.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,232
    kyf_100 said:

    Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    The problem is, the alternative wasn't the status quo - it would have been interpreted as a full throated mandate for further integration and greater loss of sovereignty, probably the Euro without a referendum etc.

    There are plenty of people like Turbo above, who 'wanted the integration of the single market without the bullshit politics' but that was never an option.
    It is also getting harder to argue that the EU is a great club to be in as it lurches to the hard right and as the economic motor - Germany - stumbles towards economic Depression and serious discontent
  • darkagedarkage Posts: 5,398
    I overheard two women on the tube yesterday talking about politics. One had a 'palestine' bag but they didn't seem like activists. They looked like they may have gone to SOAS ten years ago. Anyway they concluded that they prefer Sunak to Starmer.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 17,392

    ...


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    I'm with John on this.
    I've got to say that it's not a benefit issue that comes up much in my experience. The bedroom tax is worse but much worse still is the evil and inept approach taken to make people jump through hoops to review their disability benefits every few years, including people with conditions that only a biblical miracle would improve.
    I think too many people see the one percent liars and cheats and think it’s more like 50%. There will always be some who claim to be unable to walk more than few yards but get filmed running three times a week and completing half marathons. But they are rare.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479

    Sean_F said:

    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.

    Sunak would have run away, useless coward that he is.
    I think people, now, will be voting Conservative despite him not because of him.

    I don't think he should be allowed to make a single decision for the next 4 weeks without running it past Hague and/or Cameron.
    Four weeks?

    You are Laura K and I claim my five pounds.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 28,411
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    Yes, I agree with you and with @Sean_F

    Carrie was a turning point, and I concur with Sean F’s three points. The Tories need to die, now
    I’d never thought of it this way before but without Covid, the Cummings/Johnson team would have lasted longer and would have had more chance to show results.
    Cummings had an actual post-Brexit plan. Parts of it may have been mad, and maybe he was the wrong guy to deliver it, even from the back room, but it was a plan and it was coherent - deregulate, level up, restrict immigration to highly skilled, focus on technology and destroy the Woke blob that stops everything and slows everything else. But Boris is led by his dick and fell for Carrie and got distracted and then came Covid and the war. It’s a tragedy, really. Boris had the political rizz and Cummings had the brains - it might just have worked

    instead the Tories lie in ruins and the rubble needs to be cleared away, so we can start again
    I get quite a scary vibe from Carrie. I don't think Boris is going to leave her and the family. Not without incurring severe bodily harm.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,895

    This "Sunak is a defeated man" thing. We picked up on it. Sam Coates picked up on it. The audience are picking up on it.

    This could utterly demolish him for the last 3 weeks. The joy / sorrow of politics is the herd mentality. When the tide goes out it sucks things along with it...

    I'd like to think so Rochdale but... it's the hope that gets you
    If - and it is an *if* - this narrative settles in, then some interesting things *could* happen.

    1. "don't give Labour a supermajority" - I think there are some legs in this. Whilst its an established and widely agreed assumption that Labour will win the election, that isn't the same as Labour winning a comfortable majority, or a landslide, or a supermajority.
    In the seats they need to win I can see they taking smaller majorities as people switch into other parties, and people feeling a little freer to vote as they wish which would give a boost to the Greens and Reform

    2. The acceleration towards Tory ELE. Why vote for the loser? The herd mentality kicks in, Tory voters move onto what happens to the party after the election and accelerate the transition to Reform, people fed up switch tactically into whichever other party can punish them.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404
    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    The trouble is chronic short-termism, together with an obsession with PR, and taking the path of least resistance and keeping one's fingers crossed it all works out.

    That's not leadership. Real leadership would have been telling pensioners they can't have everything they want if they also want a strong, secure and fair country.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,895

    This "Sunak is a defeated man" thing. We picked up on it. Sam Coates picked up on it. The audience are picking up on it.

    This could utterly demolish him for the last 3 weeks. The joy / sorrow of politics is the herd mentality. When the tide goes out it sucks things along with it...

    I'd like to think so Rochdale but... it's the hope that gets you.

    (To clarify, I have no wish to see Sunak demolished as a person, but as leader of his party - and his party with him)
    Remember that my dad was a toolmaker I've met Rishi and liked him. He personally will be the opposite of demolished. A global figure, married to a billionaire, with a PM's pension, and a mega job in California.
    Istr he gave you the horn. Has the reek of political failure diminished his fanciability?
    For clarity he did not give me the horn. I had a play with the "Dishy Rishi" narrative. As I did with Jacob Rees-Mogg. Who also did not give me the horn...
  • FF43FF43 Posts: 17,208

    ...


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    I'm with John on this.
    I've got to say that it's not a benefit issue that comes up much in my experience. The bedroom tax is worse but much worse still is the evil and inept approach taken to make people jump through hoops to review their disability benefits every few years, including people with conditions that only a biblical miracle would improve.
    All of the above. But the fact remains removing the two child cap is, by far, the most efficient and cost effective way to take children out of poverty. To the extent that if you choose not to do so, you are making the choice for child poverty. Yes it's a question of budget priorities, but what would you be prioritising above this?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651
    edited June 12

    ...


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    I'm with John on this.
    I've got to say that it's not a benefit issue that comes up much in my experience. The bedroom tax is worse but much worse still is the evil and inept approach taken to make people jump through hoops to review their disability benefits every few years, including people with conditions that only a biblical miracle would improve.
    I think too many people see the one percent liars and cheats and think it’s more like 50%. There will always be some who claim to be unable to walk more than few yards but get filmed running three times a week and completing half marathons. But they are rare.
    True of course. I have to tell as many people that they aren't realistically going to get Personal Independence Payment as helping those who will.

    As for the fraudsters, they are generally dobbed in it be a neighbour of family member. Rightly so.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    What kind of numbers do you think Labour could drift out too, and (presumably) the Tories gain, to bring the majority into question?

    I'm sure if we Baxter them it will still bring a sizeable Labour majority
    I honestly have no idea, does anyone? Reform could continue their rise - or fall back. Labour could continue to slide, or surge again

    it’s a long campaign and neither of the big parties has much enthusiasm behind them, but the Tories are viscerally hated and Labour are merely tolerated as an alternative - for now

    If I was in the Lib Dems I would be shouting loudly about Single Market membership immediately to peel off Labour Remainers, and then also a promise of referendum on Rejoin in a few years. That would be cat in the pigeons territory and could upend everything

    I’ve no idea why they aren’t slotting this open goal
    I will shit my boxers with pleasure if Labour slip into the 30s on the night.

    Probably the one pleasure I will get. It will set off all sorts of internal recriminations and legitimacy questions, which will dog SKS for his whole time in office.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,232
    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    No, I’m not. Because I’m not a Labour supporter. I’m a former Lib Dem member who was roundly decried on here for quitting in a huff. Get off the board, the internet, in fact the fucking planet. Read what other people are saying rather than spending all day in a self congratulatory cock polishing session.
    Er, I’ve been working hard all morning making flints and then spent the afternoon walking around the moody old Jewish quarters of Odessa, famed from Isaac Babel’s wonderful short stories

    Now I sit here waiting for the first of Putin’s Persian drones and Iskander missiles; he always attacks at night, It’s like the African Savannah, the predators roam nocturnally, and we are the prey, the zebras and gazelles, eyes bright and wide and fearful, in the moonlight of the wilds
    Impressive that you manage do that while still making time for constant self-husbanding over that picture of yourself in your magazine showing the aftermath of you covering your face in glue before rubbing it in the bin of a Brazilian waxing salon. Have a shave you bearded failure.
    I refer the honorable PB-er to my earlier comment to @Farooq

    Swap Aberdeen for wherever it is you live. Newent?

    “No, I’m a professional artist and writer who is being paid to be in Odessa, magical Odessa, during a war! - and you are a fuck up stuck in a bedsit in drizzly Aberdeen, and that sends you - and several other PB-ers - absolutely insane with badly disguised jealousy. Which I gleefully stoke”
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,950
    Leon said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    The problem is, the alternative wasn't the status quo - it would have been interpreted as a full throated mandate for further integration and greater loss of sovereignty, probably the Euro without a referendum etc.

    There are plenty of people like Turbo above, who 'wanted the integration of the single market without the bullshit politics' but that was never an option.
    It is also getting harder to argue that the EU is a great club to be in as it lurches to the hard right and as the economic motor - Germany - stumbles towards economic Depression and serious discontent
    I was never persuaded all those times you argued that the EU was a great club to be in.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,232

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    Yes, I agree with you and with @Sean_F

    Carrie was a turning point, and I concur with Sean F’s three points. The Tories need to die, now
    I’d never thought of it this way before but without Covid, the Cummings/Johnson team would have lasted longer and would have had more chance to show results.
    Cummings had an actual post-Brexit plan. Parts of it may have been mad, and maybe he was the wrong guy to deliver it, even from the back room, but it was a plan and it was coherent - deregulate, level up, restrict immigration to highly skilled, focus on technology and destroy the Woke blob that stops everything and slows everything else. But Boris is led by his dick and fell for Carrie and got distracted and then came Covid and the war. It’s a tragedy, really. Boris had the political rizz and Cummings had the brains - it might just have worked

    instead the Tories lie in ruins and the rubble needs to be cleared away, so we can start again
    I get quite a scary vibe from Carrie. I don't think Boris is going to leave her and the family. Not without incurring severe bodily harm.
    lol yeah, likewise. Quite feminine but a wildcat if crossed. Vagina dentata
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404

    Sean_F said:

    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.

    Sunak would have run away, useless coward that he is.
    I think people, now, will be voting Conservative despite him not because of him.

    I don't think he should be allowed to make a single decision for the next 4 weeks without running it past Hague and/or Cameron.
    Four weeks?

    You are Laura K and I claim my five pounds.
    Even after the election is over I still don't think he should be allowed to make a single decision without running it past Hague and/or Cameron.
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,351

    Wes Streeting is a class act. Incredibly talented communicator.

    Did he just say "Sure, Jan"?
    Surely somebody has said 'He's dead, Jim' to Cleverly?
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404
    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    On defence and justice, Cameron and Osborne share the blame. Both men decided that the public don’t care about these issues.

    On border control, that’s on Boris and his successors.
    I think they all took the lesson that politics can be entirely cynical from Tony Blair.
    They took all the wrong lessons from New Labour, and failed to appreciate that the post 2008 world is a very different place to the pre 2008 world.

    Ours is in age of blood and iron.
    In short, they were sugar-rush politicians not serious politicians.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,232

    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    No, I’m not. Because I’m not a Labour supporter. I’m a former Lib Dem member who was roundly decried on here for quitting in a huff. Get off the board, the internet, in fact the fucking planet. Read what other people are saying rather than spending all day in a self congratulatory cock polishing session.
    Er, I’ve been working hard all morning making flints and then spent the afternoon walking around the moody old Jewish quarters of Odessa, famed from Isaac Babel’s wonderful short stories

    Now I sit here waiting for the first of Putin’s Persian drones and Iskander missiles; he always attacks at night, It’s like the African Savannah, the predators roam nocturnally, and we are the prey, the zebras and gazelles, eyes bright and wide and fearful, in the moonlight of the wilds
    I can't help viewing this exchange in the light of the few minutes of debate that I just watched. Doug, the angry audience member. You with your impalpable waffle, impervious to the fact that three quarters of the people reading your words think you're swine.

    You are Rishi Sunak.
    No, I’m a professional artist and writer who is being paid to be in Odessa, magical Odessa, during a war! - and you are a fuck up stuck in a bedsit in drizzly Aberdeen, and that sends you - and several other PB-ers - absolutely insane with badly disguised jealousy. Which I gleefully stoke
    Hey, I didn't say I was in the three quarters, Rishi. I'm actually a huge fan.
    I do wish you'd tone it down with romanticising war, though. I know after a few glasses you like lurching to rag-time tunes but it makes you seem like a bit of a ghoul.
    Personal question. Do you have aspirations to be a writer? I sense that maybe you do

    I rather liked your limerick earlier on, it’s hard to nail a limerick, and you did
    There was a young man called Farage
    Who one day got locked in his garage
    He campaigned so hard
    But let down his guard
    And fell to an electoral barrage.
    That’s….. quite bad. Needs work on the scansion. Sorry Sunil!
  • bigglesbiggles Posts: 6,047
    edited June 12

    biggles said:

    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    He only needs to lose a debate by a 2-1 margin?
    He only needs to get a decent chunk of 36% of voters to think he’s worth their vote….

    The rest don’t matter to him.

    His only strategy now is to eat into Reform and hope Labour dips a bit more.
    Eh? Just because 64% said Starmer won doesn’t mean 64% will vote for him!
    No. Ignore the 64%. That’s a red herring. I didn’t watch but I am sure Sunak was appalling because he always is. 36% still say he won. That’s his voter pool. That’s his max - so blind to his shit-ness or full of hate for Labour that they think he won.

    And the Tories are no longer, I assume, playing to win. They are playing to minimise the loss.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 4,569

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    What kind of numbers do you think Labour could drift out too, and (presumably) the Tories gain, to bring the majority into question?

    I'm sure if we Baxter them it will still bring a sizeable Labour majority
    I honestly have no idea, does anyone? Reform could continue their rise - or fall back. Labour could continue to slide, or surge again

    it’s a long campaign and neither of the big parties has much enthusiasm behind them, but the Tories are viscerally hated and Labour are merely tolerated as an alternative - for now

    If I was in the Lib Dems I would be shouting loudly about Single Market membership immediately to peel off Labour Remainers, and then also a promise of referendum on Rejoin in a few years. That would be cat in the pigeons territory and could upend everything

    I’ve no idea why they aren’t slotting this open goal
    I will shit my boxers with pleasure if Labour slip into the 30s on the night.

    Probably the one pleasure I will get. It will set off all sorts of internal recriminations and legitimacy questions, which will dog SKS for his whole time in office.
    The SNP getting a bloody nose is on my list of election night pleasures.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,496
    darkage said:

    I overheard two women on the tube yesterday talking about politics. One had a 'palestine' bag but they didn't seem like activists. They looked like they may have gone to SOAS ten years ago. Anyway they concluded that they prefer Sunak to Starmer.

    About 20% of voters plan to vote Tory at the moment. Occasionally you are going to meet one. I haven't knowingly met one for ages, and as I live in the old Penrith and Border seat (Whitelaw, Rory, One Nation heartland), that is saying something. But they are out there somewhere.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,655

    biggles said:

    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    He only needs to lose a debate by a 2-1 margin?
    He only needs to get a decent chunk of 36% of voters to think he’s worth their vote….

    The rest don’t matter to him.

    His only strategy now is to eat into Reform and hope Labour dips a bit more.
    Eh? Just because 64% said Starmer won doesn’t mean 64% will vote for him!
    Was there a "they're both c**ts" option?
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 71,351

    ...


    John McDonnell
    @johnmcdonnellMP
    ·
    1h
    I’ve consistently campaigned for scrapping of the 2 child limit but we heard tonight it will not be in manifesto. I know this is the very last minute for an appeal for an amendment to the Labour Manifesto but before it is published tomorrow I am appealing for this to be included.

    https://x.com/johnmcdonnellMP/status/1800965371026927943

    I'm with John on this.
    Suella Braverman is too. And so am I.
    And Johnson, of course, is desperate to be rid of it.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,113
    tlg86 said:

    https://x.com/GuidoFawkes/status/1800979730335961512

    Guido Fawkes @GuidoFawkes
    Total bullshit story. Section 42 definition of "Cheating" as per the Gambling Act applies when you nobble a horse, bribe a croupier or mark cards not when you have inside information that your bet is a dead certainty. It requires interference to be a crime.

    It's true that it's not ILLEGAL.

    But - like adultery - it's probably not moral.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 55,232

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    The trouble is chronic short-termism, together with an obsession with PR, and taking the path of least resistance and keeping one's fingers crossed it all works out.

    That's not leadership. Real leadership would have been telling pensioners they can't have everything they want if they also want a strong, secure and fair country.
    Absolutely right. And Boris had the majority to do that. 80 seats

    TBF they did get rolled over by Covid, like every government, but still

    And on that note, it is midnight in Odessa and I want to be fast asleep before the drones, so I sleep through them again, it’s much better for the nerves. night night
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,826
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    darkage said:

    Sean_F said:

    Sean_F said:

    I’ve decided. I really hope Reform kills off the Conservative Party at this election. The Conservatives have to die ( ex-councillor and constituency association chairman).

    @Benpointer has a nice preview of your wish coming true:

    https://x.com/TorinPhable/status/1800226199047901292
    For me, it’s three things.

    1. Running down military capacity, at a time of rising international tension.
    2. Gutting the criminal justice system.
    3. Ending border controls.
    Yes these are inexcusable.

    The moment things went wrong was when Cummings left and got 'replaced' briefly by Carrie, things just got confused after that. After 2022 the basis on which they won was abandoned. The Conservatives were governing with no legitimacy. This situation now is a lesson about the risks of doing this.
    Yes, I agree with you and with @Sean_F

    Carrie was a turning point, and I concur with Sean F’s three points. The Tories need to die, now
    I’d never thought of it this way before but without Covid, the Cummings/Johnson team would have lasted longer and would have had more chance to show results.
    Cummings had an actual post-Brexit plan. Parts of it may have been mad, and maybe he was the wrong guy to deliver it, even from the back room, but it was a plan and it was coherent - deregulate, level up, restrict immigration to highly skilled, focus on technology and destroy the Woke blob that stops everything and slows everything else. But Boris is led by his dick and fell for Carrie and got distracted and then came Covid and the war. It’s a tragedy, really. Boris had the political rizz and Cummings had the brains - it might just have worked

    instead the Tories lie in ruins and the rubble needs to be cleared away, so we can start again
    Cummings has never struck me as having a very coherent set of ideas underneath all his corporate/science babble. He's also peculiarly hostile to Ukraine, not simply a Russia appeaser. And Johnson was always likely to self destruct as PM because he has no self discipline. You might be able to get away with that as a flamboyant Mayor but not in the top job.
  • algarkirk said:

    darkage said:

    I overheard two women on the tube yesterday talking about politics. One had a 'palestine' bag but they didn't seem like activists. They looked like they may have gone to SOAS ten years ago. Anyway they concluded that they prefer Sunak to Starmer.

    About 20% of voters plan to vote Tory at the moment. Occasionally you are going to meet one. I haven't knowingly met one for ages, and as I live in the old Penrith and Border seat (Whitelaw, Rory, One Nation heartland), that is saying something. But they are out there somewhere.
    Have you not been in the cafe in the Penrith Booths? I imagine they might gather there.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479

    Sean_F said:

    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.

    Sunak would have run away, useless coward that he is.
    I think people, now, will be voting Conservative despite him not because of him.

    I don't think he should be allowed to make a single decision for the next 4 weeks without running it past Hague and/or Cameron.
    Four weeks?

    You are Laura K and I claim my five pounds.
    Even after the election is over I still don't think he should be allowed to make a single decision without running it past Hague and/or Cameron.
    Ha! Okay, fair enough!
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,479

    biggles said:

    biggles said:

    Starmer smashes it.

    64% - 36%

    Great job.

    But if that’s representative, then it’s all Sunak needs….
    He only needs to lose a debate by a 2-1 margin?
    He only needs to get a decent chunk of 36% of voters to think he’s worth their vote….

    The rest don’t matter to him.

    His only strategy now is to eat into Reform and hope Labour dips a bit more.
    Eh? Just because 64% said Starmer won doesn’t mean 64% will vote for him!
    Was there a "they're both c**ts" option?
    Give it a rest.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    Sorry for the bad language. A few too many tonight…
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 12,496
    Leon said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    The problem is, the alternative wasn't the status quo - it would have been interpreted as a full throated mandate for further integration and greater loss of sovereignty, probably the Euro without a referendum etc.

    There are plenty of people like Turbo above, who 'wanted the integration of the single market without the bullshit politics' but that was never an option.
    It is also getting harder to argue that the EU is a great club to be in as it lurches to the hard right and as the economic motor - Germany - stumbles towards economic Depression and serious discontent
    Matt noticed this a couple of days ago:
    https://x.com/MattCartoonist/status/1800210044811681859
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,895
    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    No, I’m not. Because I’m not a Labour supporter. I’m a former Lib Dem member who was roundly decried on here for quitting in a huff. Get off the board, the internet, in fact the fucking planet. Read what other people are saying rather than spending all day in a self congratulatory cock polishing session.
    Er, I’ve been working hard all morning making flints and then spent the afternoon walking around the moody old Jewish quarters of Odessa, famed from Isaac Babel’s wonderful short stories

    Now I sit here waiting for the first of Putin’s Persian drones and Iskander missiles; he always attacks at night, It’s like the African Savannah, the predators roam nocturnally, and we are the prey, the zebras and gazelles, eyes bright and wide and fearful, in the moonlight of the wilds
    I can't help viewing this exchange in the light of the few minutes of debate that I just watched. Doug, the angry audience member. You with your impalpable waffle, impervious to the fact that three quarters of the people reading your words think you're swine.

    You are Rishi Sunak.
    No, I’m a professional artist and writer who is being paid to be in Odessa, magical Odessa, during a war! - and you are a fuck up stuck in a bedsit in drizzly Aberdeen, and that sends you - and several other PB-ers - absolutely insane with badly disguised jealousy. Which I gleefully stoke
    Hey, I didn't say I was in the three quarters, Rishi. I'm actually a huge fan.
    I do wish you'd tone it down with romanticising war, though. I know after a few glasses you like lurching to rag-time tunes but it makes you seem like a bit of a ghoul.
    Personal question. Do you have aspirations to be a writer? I sense that maybe you do

    I rather liked your limerick earlier on, it’s hard to nail a limerick, and you did
    I am a writer, in the sense that I've had things published*. It's not my occupation, though.
    I don't have the patience or focus for anything long form.

    *I'm leaving an open goal here but trust me nobody's going to throw a barb here I haven't already heard.
    I'm a YouTuber and influencer. That last word sounds absurd as I type it, but I know I have influenced people's decisions as they openly tell me. I've been stopped in the street with "I watch your channel" which was surreal. I've had some free stuff for review, and have a relatively small cash sponsorship with a very big brand proposal due for a decision shortly (they approached me).

    I had no idea how my YouTube project would go, but its (mostly) a lot of fun. As long as it stays fun I will be happy.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 57,113
    edited June 12

    ukelect said:

    The latest UK-Elect prediction is now out at https://www.ukelect.co.uk/HTML/forecasts/20240612ForecastUK.html

    It takes account of recent polling changes and is also now based on the final candidates list. It shows Lab 403, Con 172, LD34, SNP 18 (a Lab majority of 158).

    Cons a big buy, if you're right.
    That's a pretty similar forecast to my own.

    With the caveat that it's entirely possible that things go entirely tits up for the Conservative party in the next three weeks.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,937
    Leon said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    The problem is, the alternative wasn't the status quo - it would have been interpreted as a full throated mandate for further integration and greater loss of sovereignty, probably the Euro without a referendum etc.

    There are plenty of people like Turbo above, who 'wanted the integration of the single market without the bullshit politics' but that was never an option.
    It is also getting harder to argue that the EU is a great club to be in as it lurches to the hard right and as the economic motor - Germany - stumbles towards economic Depression and serious discontent
    For a while, I thought Brexit had saved the UK from a lurch to the hard right. Now, I think we've probably only delayed it. Our politicians are making similar mistakes, e.g. on immigration. Hence the return of the Faragistas.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,009
    G7 meeting coming up.

    Sunak representing the UK.

    OK, make that G6.5
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404
    darkage said:

    I overheard two women on the tube yesterday talking about politics. One had a 'palestine' bag but they didn't seem like activists. They looked like they may have gone to SOAS ten years ago. Anyway they concluded that they prefer Sunak to Starmer.

    I'm not detecting any enthusiasm for Starmer.

    It's entirely driven by a desire to eject the existing administration.

    If Starmer confuses that for a real mandate to do whatever he likes once he's in office he's going to very quickly run into real trouble.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,344

    Sean_F said:

    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.

    Sunak would have run away, useless coward that he is.
    I think people, now, will be voting Conservative despite him not because of him.

    I don't think he should be allowed to make a single decision for the next 4 weeks without running it past Hague and/or Cameron.
    Four weeks?

    You are Laura K and I claim my five pounds.
    Even after the election is over I still don't think he should be allowed to make a single decision without running it past Hague and/or Cameron.
    I wonder how he feeds and dresses himself.
  • DM_AndyDM_Andy Posts: 1,127

    darkage said:

    I overheard two women on the tube yesterday talking about politics. One had a 'palestine' bag but they didn't seem like activists. They looked like they may have gone to SOAS ten years ago. Anyway they concluded that they prefer Sunak to Starmer.

    I'm not detecting any enthusiasm for Starmer.

    It's entirely driven by a desire to eject the existing administration.

    If Starmer confuses that for a real mandate to do whatever he likes once he's in office he's going to very quickly run into real trouble.
    The mandate will be having a majority in the House of Commons.

  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,618
    edited June 12
    darkage said:

    Heathener said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    What kind of numbers do you think Labour could drift out too, and (presumably) the Tories gain, to bring the majority into question?

    I'm sure if we Baxter them it will still bring a sizeable Labour majority
    Playing around on Baxter I get Labour falling short of a majority on poll shares (and seats) of:

    CON 25% (226)
    LAB 30% (321)
    LDM 15% (56)
    RFM 17% (4)
    GRN 8% (3)

    We're some distance from that, but the interesting thing about that scenario is that it doesn't require any particular Tory recovery. They only have to get around what their best current poll scores give them (25% with Savanta and More in Common). It then only requires Labour to fail to squeeze the Greens, and to lose a few more soft voters to LDM/RFM/GRN on the basis that they're inevitably going to win by a huge margin, and then to have been somewhat overdone in the polls by a bit.

    It's a much more plausible route to a Hung Parliament than a Tory recovery to >30%.
    Yes, for me the worst scenario for Labour would be a 2005 style lack of enthusiasm depressing their vote, but with the other parties doing just a bit better and denying them a majority.
    I mentioned earlier today that this talk of a ’SuperMajority' is the first smart thing the Conservatives have done all campaign.

    It’s very dangerous for Labour.
    The supermajority fear was one I have been toying with for a while. I would prefer Starmer to win but don't want Labour to have a massive majority. The blair experience is quite instructive.
    In part I think this accounts for the modest drop in Lab polling (though Con is dropping as quickly) and also folk like me not feeling the need or desire to back Labour, and can look at LD or Green. Depending on geography and if looking at their own seats could be a further wound to the Tories.

    Also DKs making up their minds too.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,655

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    What kind of numbers do you think Labour could drift out too, and (presumably) the Tories gain, to bring the majority into question?

    I'm sure if we Baxter them it will still bring a sizeable Labour majority
    I honestly have no idea, does anyone? Reform could continue their rise - or fall back. Labour could continue to slide, or surge again

    it’s a long campaign and neither of the big parties has much enthusiasm behind them, but the Tories are viscerally hated and Labour are merely tolerated as an alternative - for now

    If I was in the Lib Dems I would be shouting loudly about Single Market membership immediately to peel off Labour Remainers, and then also a promise of referendum on Rejoin in a few years. That would be cat in the pigeons territory and could upend everything

    I’ve no idea why they aren’t slotting this open goal
    I will shit my boxers with pleasure if Labour slip into the 30s on the night.

    Probably the one pleasure I will get. It will set off all sorts of internal recriminations and legitimacy questions, which will dog SKS for his whole time in office.
    I will be very happy and have made a very large profit on my 8/1 on SKS failing to beat Jezzas 12.9m votes from 2017

    That bet is still available with Sky Bet but its now only 13/8 but based on the last 5 polls should be odds on DYOR
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,651
    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    Farooq said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    DougSeal said:

    Leon said:

    MikeL said:

    Heathener said:

    People Polling drops

    Lab 39
    Con 19
    Reform 17

    https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1800960821763178604

    Apologies if this was mentioned ages ago

    Changes:

    Lab 39 (-7)
    Con 19 (-1)
    Ref 17 (+3)
    That is a MASSIVE drop in Labour VI. I said a couple of days ago they will be nervous at the slide and was decried on here, they will be more than nervous now
    No. They won’t. I decried you then and I decry you now. This is a PP reversion to the mean from the stupid LAB VI they had before.
    Of course, dear. You’re not nervous at all
    No, I’m not. Because I’m not a Labour supporter. I’m a former Lib Dem member who was roundly decried on here for quitting in a huff. Get off the board, the internet, in fact the fucking planet. Read what other people are saying rather than spending all day in a self congratulatory cock polishing session.
    Er, I’ve been working hard all morning making flints and then spent the afternoon walking around the moody old Jewish quarters of Odessa, famed from Isaac Babel’s wonderful short stories

    Now I sit here waiting for the first of Putin’s Persian drones and Iskander missiles; he always attacks at night, It’s like the African Savannah, the predators roam nocturnally, and we are the prey, the zebras and gazelles, eyes bright and wide and fearful, in the moonlight of the wilds
    I can't help viewing this exchange in the light of the few minutes of debate that I just watched. Doug, the angry audience member. You with your impalpable waffle, impervious to the fact that three quarters of the people reading your words think you're swine.

    You are Rishi Sunak.
    No, I’m a professional artist and writer who is being paid to be in Odessa, magical Odessa, during a war! - and you are a fuck up stuck in a bedsit in drizzly Aberdeen, and that sends you - and several other PB-ers - absolutely insane with badly disguised jealousy. Which I gleefully stoke
    Hey, I didn't say I was in the three quarters, Rishi. I'm actually a huge fan.
    I do wish you'd tone it down with romanticising war, though. I know after a few glasses you like lurching to rag-time tunes but it makes you seem like a bit of a ghoul.
    Personal question. Do you have aspirations to be a writer? I sense that maybe you do

    I rather liked your limerick earlier on, it’s hard to nail a limerick, and you did
    There was a young man called Farage
    Who one day got locked in his garage
    He campaigned so hard
    But let down his guard
    And fell to an electoral barrage.
    That’s….. quite bad. Needs work on the scansion. Sorry Sunil!
    Did Farage once say his surname rhymes with garage, or is that an urban myth?

    I hope it's true because where I come from we'd all have to start calling him Nigel Farridge, which suits him better I think.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,895
    kyf_100 said:

    Leon said:

    kyf_100 said:

    Leon said:

    There aren’t any Brexiteers left. And I speak as a Brexiteer who would vote Brexit again tomorrow

    i also tell the truth as I see it. Brexit is perceived as a failure and most people regret it and they would vote Remain now, polls even show they don’t care about Free Movement (and you can see why, when post Brexit immigration triples rather than falls)

    Labour are shit scared of Brexit as a subject because of the Red Wall and because Starmer has bad previous as a 2nd voter. The Lib Dems have always been pro EU and wanted to REVOKE at the 2019 election (insane and evil but that was their policy)

    This is a howling great opportunity for the LDs. The electorate is volatile, they regret Brexit, they want to reverse it, this won’t last, the Lib Dems could surge to 20%+ if they came out full throttle NOW as the join the SM and and vote on Rejoin party, which, if given some power, could then influence Labour to do this

    It’s mad they can’t see this

    Why
    To own the libs, clearly…

    There were many reasons to vote leave, and many to vote remain. I think an awful lot of people wanted the economic integration of the single market without the bullshit politics (ok, I’m mainly talking about me, but I don’t think I’m alone). In the end I judged that the market was worth the other, and voted remain, and lost. I think before Brexit a lot of rubbish was spoken and written blaming the EU and our membership for every I’ll. and after Brexit the reverse has happened - everything that’s wrong is down to Brexit. Both positions were are are stupid, and wrong. But it’s not dishonest to want to trade freely with our friends and allies across the channel without the need for a European Parliament, that in my eyes, doesn't seem to actually run the EU.
    Do you honestly think it's been worth it?
    The problem is, the alternative wasn't the status quo - it would have been interpreted as a full throated mandate for further integration and greater loss of sovereignty, probably the Euro without a referendum etc.

    There are plenty of people like Turbo above, who 'wanted the integration of the single market without the bullshit politics' but that was never an option.
    It is also getting harder to argue that the EU is a great club to be in as it lurches to the hard right and as the economic motor - Germany - stumbles towards economic Depression and serious discontent
    For a while, I thought Brexit had saved the UK from a lurch to the hard right. Now, I think we've probably only delayed it. Our politicians are making similar mistakes, e.g. on immigration. Hence the return of the Faragistas.
    Look at the economics slides put up by Sky in the post-debate coverage. a 20% inflationary spike since Covid. On top of decades of decay in so many places.

    The rise of the hard right is what happens when economies fail voters. Reform are going to score more votes than UKIP did in 2015, and win seats. More importantly they are displacing the Tories as the populist right party.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 28,895
    edited June 12
    Sky: 1/3 of 2019 Tory voters say Starmer won tonight...
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 48,618

    Sky: 1/3 of 2019 Tory voters say Starmer won tonight...

    2019 CON voters!
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    Tim Shipman has pushed back the release date of his last book, presumably to cover the Rishi car-crash election.
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 60,404
    Sean_F said:

    Its a good job for Sunak that Starmer didn't agree to 6 weekly debates. If he is broken after a couple of them, it wouldn't have ended well.

    Sunak would have run away, useless coward that he is.
    I just think he's entirely unprepared for the skills needed for a frontline politician.

    Smooth selection for a safe seat isn't it.
This discussion has been closed.