Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » 14 months to go and still no sign of a movement that could

SystemSystem Posts: 11,699
edited March 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » 14 months to go and still no sign of a movement that could stop Ed Miliband becoming PM

At the weekend Martin Baxter who’s been running Electoral Calculus for nearly 20 years produced his latest polling average and projections for the general election.

Read the full story here


«1345

Comments

  • Options
    Populus ‏@PopulusPolls 26m
    New Populus VI: Lab 37 (-1); Cons 34 (+1); LD 10 (+1); UKIP 12 (-1); Oth 8 (+1) Tables: http://popu.lu/s_vi140303
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    Second!
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    edited March 2014
    Ethnic groups of Ukraine:

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/68/Russians_Ukraine_2001.PNG

    Crimea is the only area with an ethnic Russian majority.
  • Options
    But there has been some narrowing between Tories and Labour in the last year or so?

    It may continue, or it may not continue, but had you had said to me as a Tory a couple of years ago, or even a year ago, that with 15 months ago, the Tories are around 3-5 points behind Labour, I'd have bitten your hand off.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited March 2014
    Everything's pointing to a hung parliament IMO, with the Tories ahead on votes and Labour with most seats.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,002
    F1: want to read my rambly thoughts on the second and third tests? They're up here:
    http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/f1-2014-second-and-third-tests.html
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,712
    At the moment there are also 2 potential game-changers.

    The first is the Scottish independent vote, the second being some form of black-swan event, whether Ukraine or similar..
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    14 months but 2 budgets and an autumn statement.

    Like the Indyref - looks like it will take GO to win it.

  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    But there has been some narrowing between Tories and Labour in the last year or so?

    It may continue, or it may not continue, but had you had said to me as a Tory a couple of years ago, or even a year ago, that with 15 months ago, the Tories are around 3-5 points behind Labour, I'd have bitten your hand off.

    Come on. It's dead easy to select a moment that suits you for comparison. Why not take it from two years ago?

    Remember as well that to win most seats the Tories probably going to need lead of 4%+


  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    You see what you want to see in this chart. The Conservatives are well off their low point, Labour are well off their high point. Is the gap continuing to close slowly? Pass.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    FPT

    @Pulpstar

    Aren't these oligarchs mostly fairly anti-Putin ?

    No. The Kensington Russians are middle class oligarchs who remain employed in Putin's Russia.

    It is John O who houses most of the Yeltsin era anti-Putin aristocratic oligarchs. Englefield Green, Virginia Water and Woking and the dogging country of Esher are where the aristocratic palaces are located.

    Do a search for "country houses" on Savills or Knight, Frank and you will quickly see that great estates of yore have been replaced by one acre manor houses of the home counties at the top of the value list.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    This chart appears to show the decline of LD support as an on-going trend, rather than an immediate re-alignment after the 2010 election. They got 14% at the May 2013 locals, it'll be interesting to see if they fall below that this year.
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,002
    Mr. Smithson, might the inherent Labour advantage not be adversely affected if the UKIPalypse comes to pass, and the purples actually do get a very respectable percentage of votes?

    Whilst it's undoubtedly home to many disaffected blues, UKIP have also taken on a good share of white working class sorts who might otherwise vote Labour.
  • Options

    But there has been some narrowing between Tories and Labour in the last year or so?

    It may continue, or it may not continue, but had you had said to me as a Tory a couple of years ago, or even a year ago, that with 15 months ago, the Tories are around 3-5 points behind Labour, I'd have bitten your hand off.

    Come on. It's dead easy to select a moment that suits you for comparison. Why not take it from two years ago?

    Remember as well that to win most seats the Tories probably going to need lead of 4%+


    My favourite comparison is that the Tories are only 2-3% down on their General Election score.

    That said, I'm expecting Ed Miliband to become Prime Minister next May.
  • Options
    TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    But there has been some narrowing between Tories and Labour in the last year or so?

    It may continue, or it may not continue, but had you had said to me as a Tory a couple of years ago, or even a year ago, that with 15 months ago, the Tories are around 3-5 points behind Labour, I'd have bitten your hand off.

    It's dead easy to select a moment that suits you for comparison.


    Like a year ago when they were sub 30 % and now seem to be up 6-7% in less than 12 months ?

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    "Time is ticking away" opines OGH. Indeed it is but of course the bell will be tolling for the LotO as :

    Ed Miliband will never be Prime Minister.

    ..............................................................

    Latest ARSE 2015 General Election Projection Countdown :

    19 hours ....
  • Options
    AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 23,763
    SeanT said:

    fpt for Avery

    The most crucial stat that everyone conveniently overlooks:

    Ukraine GDP per capita, 2012: $3,877
    Russia GDP per capita, 2012: $14,302

    http://tinyurl.com/8hw7x

    The average Ukrainian is THREE TIMES POORER than the average Russian. The average Ukrainian is actually poorer than the average Angolan, Namibian, Jamaican or East Timorese.

    In that light, if you were living in dire poverty in Ukraine (as most are) and you spoke even a whiff of Russian (as many do) you'd be mad NOT to want to rejoin Russia, and instantly be part of a much richer country with all the benefits thereof.

    Imagine the Scottish independence debate, then imagine that Scotland was three times richer than England. How would that affect the vote?

    Exactly.

    Isn't it worse than that ?

    E Ukraine is the rich part of the country because it has lots of natural resources in the Donbass. W Ukraine has an economy based on wood and goat's cheese with surly french farmers looking them kept out of the EU.

    At the factory I used to run in CZ one the cleaners was from the Ukraine. She was a qualified doctor but took a cleaning job in CZ because it was better paid !
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    SeanT said:

    fpt for Avery

    The most crucial stat that everyone conveniently overlooks:

    Ukraine GDP per capita, 2012: $3,877
    Russia GDP per capita, 2012: $14,302

    http://tinyurl.com/8hw7x

    The average Ukrainian is THREE TIMES POORER than the average Russian. The average Ukrainian is actually poorer than the average Angolan, Namibian, Jamaican or East Timorese.

    Puppet states tend to do worse than the metropole. This has been the legacy of being ruled by Russian puppets for most of the last 25 years, and why they want proper independence.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited March 2014
    SeanT said:

    fpt for Avery

    The most crucial stat that everyone conveniently overlooks:

    Ukraine GDP per capita, 2012: $3,877
    Russia GDP per capita, 2012: $14,302

    http://tinyurl.com/8hw7x

    The average Ukrainian is THREE TIMES POORER than the average Russian. The average Ukrainian is actually poorer than the average Angolan, Namibian, Jamaican or East Timorese.

    In that light, if you were living in dire poverty in Ukraine (as most are) and you spoke even a whiff of Russian (as many do) you'd be mad NOT to want to rejoin Russia, and instantly be part of a much richer country with all the benefits thereof.

    Imagine the Scottish independence debate, then imagine that Scotland was three times richer than England. How would that affect the vote?

    Exactly.

    Absolutely, Sean.

    The Ukrainian crisis originates in economic division not inter-ethnic strife.

    AndyJS revealed a couple of days ago that the population in the Ukraine has fallen by seven million in decade.

    In the first two months of this year, ITAR-TASS is reporting that 700,000 Ukrainians have entered Russia through border controls.

    These emigrants (although many of the ITAR-TASS numbers will be traders rather than permanent emigres) are not fleeing civil war or persecution. They are seeking income and jobs.

    It is not as if the Ukrainians are looking to Putin's Russia for liberal and honest governance either. Corruption and oppression reigns both sides of the border. It is just the cake to be divvied up is bigger on the Russian side.
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    @UK_Together: BREAKING: New @IpsosMORIScot / @STVNews poll shows drop in support for separation and majority supporting place in UK N57 Y32 U11 #indyref

    Note to the SNPers. This post does not denigrate Scotland™
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    If the Kippers continue to decline, and Cameron continues to benefit...

    Cam will need some wins over renegotiation. I'm sure its not lost on Angela Merkel that she could have a big say on UK 2015.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,058
    @SeanT

    I think Western Ukranians look at Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and see countries that had GDP's per capita of less than $5,000 a decade ago, and now have incomes three times that level. They think: "we threw our lot in with the Russians for more than a decade and a fat lot of good it's done us, let's see if we can do what Latvia did".
  • Options
    JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,215
    Scott_P said:

    @UK_Together: BREAKING: New @IpsosMORIScot / @STVNews poll shows drop in support for separation and majority supporting place in UK N57 Y32 U11 #indyref

    Note to the SNPers. This post does not denigrate Scotland™

    I think a modest chortle is in order.

    It can't be long before a squealing piglet bares its trotters.
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    Let's compare with countries that have escaped Russia's orbit (PPP terms - the proper way to do it):

    Poland: $20,562
    Lithuania: $21,383
    Estonia: $21,714
    Latvia: $18,058
    Russia: $17,581
    Ukraine: $7,295
  • Options
    WayneWayne Posts: 8
    The polls are starting to narrow to 3 - 4 points (apart from YouJokingGov). We all know OGH's heart and head are clearly in different places. It will be interesting to see future ICM's - I bet they start to show 2-3 point Labour leads, if not a tie very soon.
    With 14 months to go, 2 budgets, more economic optimism and more bucks in peoples take home pay, I reckon we will start to see a small Tory lead. I'm still convinced that when people see and hear more of rEd in election campaign they will look at him and think "Do I really want to be governed and represented on the world stage by this odd looking socialist nerd, that sounds a Nasal Nightmare?"....
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985
    Scott_P said:

    @UK_Together: BREAKING: New @IpsosMORIScot / @STVNews poll shows drop in support for separation and majority supporting place in UK N57 Y32 U11 #indyref

    Note to the SNPers. This post does not denigrate Scotland™

    Status quo ante osbornum. I think the changes are N+2, Y+1.
  • Options
    Which by my reckoning sees Yes down 2, No, No Change.
  • Options
    Life_ina_market_townLife_ina_market_town Posts: 2,319
    edited March 2014
    That's 64% No v 36% Yes when undecideds are excluded. A seriously bad poll for the nationalists.
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    SeanT said:

    Socrates said:

    SeanT said:

    fpt for Avery

    The most crucial stat that everyone conveniently overlooks:

    Ukraine GDP per capita, 2012: $3,877
    Russia GDP per capita, 2012: $14,302

    http://tinyurl.com/8hw7x

    The average Ukrainian is THREE TIMES POORER than the average Russian. The average Ukrainian is actually poorer than the average Angolan, Namibian, Jamaican or East Timorese.

    Puppet states tend to do worse than the metropole. This has been the legacy of being ruled by Russian puppets for most of the last 25 years, and why they want proper independence.
    Oh FFS. I give up. You honestly don't believe that Russian speakers in Ukraine (of which there are 8.3m - almost 20% of the population) might actually and simply just want to be citizens of a country three times richer, which used to rule over them, and which does not persecute them for speaking the mother tongue?

    Nope - these Russians really want to stay poor and Ukrainian and then work towards greater democracy - via a Fascist-tainted revolution which distances them from the "Metropole".

    Have I got that right?
    Some Russian speakers probably do. Other Russian speakers probably don't. In any case, in most of eastern Ukraine, the majority speak Ukrainian. Perhaps we could find out what they do democratically want if they could have free and fair elections over a sustained period without Russia blackmailing and invading them.
  • Options
    SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,712
    SeanT said:

    Socrates said:

    SeanT said:

    fpt for Avery

    The most crucial stat that everyone conveniently overlooks:

    Ukraine GDP per capita, 2012: $3,877
    Russia GDP per capita, 2012: $14,302

    http://tinyurl.com/8hw7x

    The average Ukrainian is THREE TIMES POORER than the average Russian. The average Ukrainian is actually poorer than the average Angolan, Namibian, Jamaican or East Timorese.

    Puppet states tend to do worse than the metropole. This has been the legacy of being ruled by Russian puppets for most of the last 25 years, and why they want proper independence.
    Oh FFS. I give up. You honestly don't believe that Russian speakers in Ukraine (of which there are 8.3m - almost 20% of the population) might actually and simply just want to be citizens of a country three times richer, which used to rule over them, and which does not persecute them for speaking the mother tongue?

    Nope - these Russians really want to stay poor and Ukrainian and then work towards greater democracy - via a Fascist-tainted revolution which distances them from the "Metropole".

    Have I got that right?
    Maybe there should be an opinion poll and a referendum on the matter rather than Russian Tanks flowing over the border?
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985

    Which by my reckoning sees Yes down 2, No, No Change.

    I think the last poll was 5th Dec, Yes 31, No 55.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    edited March 2014
    SeanT said:

    Hmm. Looks like a UKIP peak there, back in the summer of 2013, at exactly the same moment the Tories began to recover from their mid-term nadir.

    The two trends are clearly related.

    If the Kippers continue to decline, and Cameron continues to benefit...

    The UKIP fall is not shown by all pollsters.

    http://news.opinium.co.uk/survey-results/political-polling-25th-february-2014

    "Analysis by Colin Rallings and Michael Thrasher for The Sunday Times shows how strong UKIP has become. The professors at Plymouth University Elections Centre have recalibrated their celebrated analysis of more than 100,000 votes cast in council by-elections and now put UKIP in third place in their latest national forecast: Labour 34%, Tories 28%, UKIP 17%, Lib Dems 13%.

    Since last year’s council elections, UKIP has taken 10 seats from the Conservatives and two each from Labour and the Lib Dems. In places where it stands, UKIP takes an average 22% of the vote"

    http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/comment/columns/adamboulton/article1370209.ece
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,503
    FPT - Isam: I have a four-figure sum on the outcome of the next general election. I expect a replay, by and large, of 2010 GE but with Labour around 25 seats stronger and Lib Dems 15 seats weaker.

    The interesting thing for me is what government results from that. I very much doubt the Lib-Dems will drop below 40 seats, or Labour top a net 30 gains, given all the local and incumbency factors, so the Tories should be set-up ok for a (much weaker) renewal of the coalition agreement, albeit on a overall joint majority of 20-ish.

    The question is whether both parties would go for it again. I really don't know the answer to that.

    On Mike's thread header, it is simply not the case that there is 'no sign' of any movement. There is a sign of some movement, and that is the Tories up-ticking from 31-32% to c.34% over the last 2-3 weeks.

    Of course, all the usual questions about whether that can be sustained/improved upon apply etc. but it's not 'no-change' by any means.
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    edited March 2014
    @SeanT

    Incidentally, what are the persecutions of the Russian-speakers? Were they shot down on the streets like Ukrainian-speakers were under Yanukovych? Were they beaten up by angry mobs, as Ukrainian-speakers have been in recent days in Donetsk and Sevastapol? Or was it something worse?
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Scott_P said:

    @UK_Together: BREAKING: New @IpsosMORIScot / @STVNews poll shows drop in support for separation and majority supporting place in UK N57 Y32 U11 #indyref

    Note to the SNPers. This post does not denigrate Scotland™

    Scott

    I think it might have been Putin's opposition to Scottish secession that is turning the polls.

    Those Sukhoi interceptors off the Firth of Forth must have been worrying.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    JohnO said:

    Scott_P said:

    @UK_Together: BREAKING: New @IpsosMORIScot / @STVNews poll shows drop in support for separation and majority supporting place in UK N57 Y32 U11 #indyref

    Note to the SNPers. This post does not denigrate Scotland™

    I think a modest chortle is in order.

    It can't be long before a squealing piglet bares its trotters.
    My fine Surrey traveller I'm sure we might manage more than a "modest chortle".

    I propose a singular but robust titter.

  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,058
    SeanT said:

    rcs1000 said:

    @SeanT

    I think Western Ukranians look at Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and see countries that had GDP's per capita of less than $5,000 a decade ago, and now have incomes three times that level. They think: "we threw our lot in with the Russians for more than a decade and a fat lot of good it's done us, let's see if we can do what Latvia did".

    Western Ukrainians, yes. Russophones, no.
    I don't disagree. And I think this will get sorted out reasonably amicably, with Crimea and a few other bits of Eastern Ukraine breaking off to become either part of Russia again, or a new Russian satellite state.

    Western Ukraine will, hopefully, become a stable and functioning democracy on the lines of the baltic states.
  • Options
    RobD said:

    Which by my reckoning sees Yes down 2, No, No Change.

    I think the last poll was 5th Dec, Yes 31, No 55.
    Nah.

    From last December.

    As we enter the final nine months of campaigning before next year’s referendum, our latest poll for STV News will provide a boost for those arguing in favour of Scotland becoming an independent country. Among those certain to vote in next year’s referendum, 34% would vote ‘Yes’ if the referendum were held now (up by three percentage points from September 2013), while 57% would vote ‘No’ (down two points) and 10% are undecided.

    http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3310/Support-for-Scottish-independence-goes-up-in-latest-Ipsos-MORISTV-News-poll.aspx
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    With 14 months to go, 2 budgets, more economic optimism and more bucks in peoples take home pay, I reckon we will start to see a small Tory lead.

    The hope I cling to as a tory is that the govt. still has some cards to play.
  • Options
    SocratesSocrates Posts: 10,322
    @AveryLP

    As reported by ITAR-TASS the Russian news agency... seems like a reliable source. Is that the same agency reporting that Ukrainians are currently fleeing to Russia, when the current hour-long queues are actually on the border with Poland....
  • Options
    Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,820
    edited March 2014

    Thats 64% No v 36% Yes when undecideds are excluded. A seriously bad poll for the nationalists.
    But good for those on Shadsy's 4/1 on 35% to 40% Yes.

    Is there risk to the downside? Possibly, but I think there's probably a hard core to the Yes side which means less than 35% is unlikely.

    Of course, polling now is not an infallible guide to a referendum in six months' time.

    Still less for an election in 14 months' time.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    taffys said:

    If the Kippers continue to decline, and Cameron continues to benefit...

    Cam will need some wins over renegotiation. I'm sure its not lost on Angela Merkel that she could have a big say on UK 2015.

    Why do you say decline? A poll the other day put them on 19%.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    That's 64% No v 36% Yes when undecideds are excluded. A seriously bad poll for the nationalists.
    Strangely spot on the numbers projected from my McARSE on 18th Feb.

  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,985

    RobD said:

    Which by my reckoning sees Yes down 2, No, No Change.

    I think the last poll was 5th Dec, Yes 31, No 55.
    Nah.

    From last December.

    As we enter the final nine months of campaigning before next year’s referendum, our latest poll for STV News will provide a boost for those arguing in favour of Scotland becoming an independent country. Among those certain to vote in next year’s referendum, 34% would vote ‘Yes’ if the referendum were held now (up by three percentage points from September 2013), while 57% would vote ‘No’ (down two points) and 10% are undecided.

    http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3310/Support-for-Scottish-independence-goes-up-in-latest-Ipsos-MORISTV-News-poll.aspx
    Ah yes, I was looking at the 'all' table, not 'all certain to vote'. Thanks!
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,983
    edited March 2014
    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
  • Options
    AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    edited March 2014

    That's 64% No v 36% Yes when undecideds are excluded. A seriously bad poll for the nationalists.
    Nothing is bad news for the nationalists, as we will no doubt hear soon. All part of a cunning plan to lull the Unionists into complacency, at which stage, BAM! Salmond rides forth in a flaming chariot pulled by 100 scottish wildcats and the referendum is all but won.

    Only a Westminster Unionist could possibly fail to see that.

    lol, chortle, tears of laughter, etc
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited March 2014
    rcs1000 said:

    @SeanT

    I think Western Ukranians look at Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and see countries that had GDP's per capita of less than $5,000 a decade ago, and now have incomes three times that level. They think: "we threw our lot in with the Russians for more than a decade and a fat lot of good it's done us, let's see if we can do what Latvia did".

    Robert

    Estonia has 1.3 million people. Latvia 2 million.

    The Ukraine had 48.5 million (2001) and now has 44.6 (2013 estimate).

    Estonia and Latvia always topped the GDP per capita figures during the times of the USSR.

    Poland may be a better comparison but does the EU, IMF and US have the resources needed to lift the Ukraine's economy up to Polish levels, especially if Russia closes its markets?

    The only solution to this crisis is a deal between Russia, the EU, IMF, US and a new 'representative' Kiev government.

    If that is unachieveable, then Ukraine will be partitioned and the West Ukraine will become just a larger version of Moldova.
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Why do you say decline? A poll the other day put them on 19%.

    Well that was a quote from another poster but I take your point.
  • Options
    BenMBenM Posts: 1,795
    Maybe I have a different reading of this chart but I wouldn't say it shows "no sign" of movement towards the Tories?

    At this stage, a slow improvement is ok. If by conference season the Tories are level pegging - and even with this drift they could be - then we can make some surer predictions.

    What we can agree it does show is that Osborne's 2012 'omnsihambles' budget was a calamity of almost election losing proportions. The Tory version of Gordon Brown's disastrous election-that-never-was.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    isam said:

    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
    Have you mixed up your yes/no there?

  • Options
    RobD said:

    RobD said:

    Which by my reckoning sees Yes down 2, No, No Change.

    I think the last poll was 5th Dec, Yes 31, No 55.
    Nah.

    From last December.

    As we enter the final nine months of campaigning before next year’s referendum, our latest poll for STV News will provide a boost for those arguing in favour of Scotland becoming an independent country. Among those certain to vote in next year’s referendum, 34% would vote ‘Yes’ if the referendum were held now (up by three percentage points from September 2013), while 57% would vote ‘No’ (down two points) and 10% are undecided.

    http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3310/Support-for-Scottish-independence-goes-up-in-latest-Ipsos-MORISTV-News-poll.aspx
    Ah yes, I was looking at the 'all' table, not 'all certain to vote'. Thanks!
    IndyRef polling comparisons is very challenging.

    There's a tendency to compare polls including DKs to polls excluding DKs and likelihood to vote.

    Is why I keep a spreadsheet with them all in, makes things easier to track.
  • Options
    isam said:

    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
    ANY NATS READING THAT - ROBD's got his Yes and No mixed up.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Socrates said:

    @AveryLP

    As reported by ITAR-TASS the Russian news agency... seems like a reliable source. Is that the same agency reporting that Ukrainians are currently fleeing to Russia, when the current hour-long queues are actually on the border with Poland....

    I am sure all borders out of the Ukraine have queues, Socrates.

    Is the relative length of border control delay significant?

  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,913
    UKIP clearly peaked straight after last year's local elections. Likely, there'll be another spike in UKIP's support after this year's local and Euro elections.

    The R & T vote shares, Lab 34%, Con 28%, UKIP 17%, Lib Dem 13% are probably similar to the vote shares we'll see in the local elections. Due to the way it's vote is spread, UKIP won't win anything like 17% of the seats. But, even winning 5% of council seats would give the party another 220 councillors.

    In the Euros, I'd expect to see the Conservatives and Labour polling below those shares, and UKIP well above 17%.

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    SeanT said:

    Thats 64% No v 36% Yes when undecideds are excluded. A seriously bad poll for the nationalists.
    But good for those on Shadsy's 4/1 on 35% to 40% Yes.

    Is there risk to the downside? Possibly, but I think there's probably a hard core to the Yes side which means less than 35% is unlikely.

    Of course, polling now is not an infallible guide to a referendum in six month's time.

    Nor for an election in 14 months' time.
    William Hill's 1/4 on a No vote is arguably better value, as LIAMT notes, when you look at the IPSOS-MORI poll with DKs taken out - 64& No, 34% Yes.

    That is just a huge mountain to climb, and as Peter Kellner said today, not much is changing, nor is it likely to change (opinions have hardened on both sides).

    if Kellner is right, 1/4 is a guaranteed return of 25% on your money, if you can tie it up for 7 months.
    Will you please get back to work !!

    Turnout is the better option. McARSE is projecting close to 80%. There are plenty of tasty odds available on that basis

  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    I've just been invited to speak at IndyRef meeting the Scottish Parliament in April - a follow-up to one I did in Feb last year. Looking forward to it.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 32,046
    SeanT said:

    rcs1000 said:

    @SeanT

    I think Western Ukranians look at Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, and see countries that had GDP's per capita of less than $5,000 a decade ago, and now have incomes three times that level. They think: "we threw our lot in with the Russians for more than a decade and a fat lot of good it's done us, let's see if we can do what Latvia did".

    Western Ukrainians, yes. Russophones, no.
    Wasn’t Western Ukraine part of Poland until the “settlement” after WWII?
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    I've just been invited to speak at IndyRef meeting the Scottish Parliament in April - a follow-up to one I did in Feb last year. Looking forward to it.

    Take your passport !!

  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,983
    SeanT said:

    Thats 64% No v 36% Yes when undecideds are excluded. A seriously bad poll for the nationalists.
    But good for those on Shadsy's 4/1 on 35% to 40% Yes.

    Is there risk to the downside? Possibly, but I think there's probably a hard core to the Yes side which means less than 35% is unlikely.

    Of course, polling now is not an infallible guide to a referendum in six month's time.

    Nor for an election in 14 months' time.
    William Hill's 1/4 on a No vote is arguably better value, as LIAMT notes, when you look at the IPSOS-MORI poll with DKs taken out - 64& No, 34% Yes.

    That is just a huge mountain to climb, and as Peter Kellner said today, not much is changing, nor is it likely to change (opinions have hardened on both sides).

    if Kellner is right, 1/4 is a guaranteed return of 25% on your money, if you can tie it up for 7 months.
    Without looking at any polling.. ITS AN ARB!! BACK IT!
  • Options
    BenM said:

    Maybe I have a different reading of this chart but I wouldn't say it shows "no sign" of movement towards the Tories?

    At this stage, a slow improvement is ok. If by conference season the Tories are level pegging - and even with this drift they could be - then we can make some surer predictions.

    What we can agree it does show is that Osborne's 2012 'omnsihambles' budget was a calamity of almost election losing proportions. The Tory version of Gordon Brown's disastrous election-that-never-was.

    Funny you mention that, I'm writing a piece that shows in the last seven years, the two largest sustained voting shifts are the election that never was and the omnishambles budgets.

    Both of which, George Osborne figured heavily in (it was his IHT pledge that in part stopped Brown going to the country in 2007)

    Now, given that the 2015 Budget is likely to the be start of the General Election campaign, Tories should be both afraid and reassured.
  • Options
    TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    Anorak said:

    That's 64% No v 36% Yes when undecideds are excluded. A seriously bad poll for the nationalists.
    Nothing is bad news for the nationalists, as we will no doubt hear soon. All part of a cunning plan to lull the Unionists into complacency, at which stage, BAM! Salmond rides forth in a flaming chariot pulled by 100 scottish wildcats and the referendum is all but won.

    Only a Westminster Unionist could possibly fail to see that.

    lol, chortle, tears of laughter, etc
    Don't be too hasty - Salmond's got the vote winning £2.5M poster campaign waiting in the wings.

  • Options
    BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789

    But there has been some narrowing between Tories and Labour in the last year or so?

    It may continue, or it may not continue, but had you had said to me as a Tory a couple of years ago, or even a year ago, that with 15 months ago, the Tories are around 3-5 points behind Labour, I'd have bitten your hand off.

    Come on. It's dead easy to select a moment that suits you for comparison. Why not take it from two years ago?

    Remember as well that to win most seats the Tories probably going to need lead of 4%+


    Exactly right Mike. Also, I note there has been much discussion about the Tories "ticking up" to 34%. As I predicted. When this reverts to the mean we shall be hit by the usual wall of silence. Labour holding well, given the relentless bad news and smearing last week. But needs to pull away.
  • Options

    I've just been invited to speak at IndyRef meeting the Scottish Parliament in April - a follow-up to one I did in Feb last year. Looking forward to it.

    So this means there's going to be an IndyRef poll published hours before you give your talk, just like last time?
  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,913
    SeanT said:

    Thats 64% No v 36% Yes when undecideds are excluded. A seriously bad poll for the nationalists.
    But good for those on Shadsy's 4/1 on 35% to 40% Yes.

    Is there risk to the downside? Possibly, but I think there's probably a hard core to the Yes side which means less than 35% is unlikely.

    Of course, polling now is not an infallible guide to a referendum in six month's time.

    Nor for an election in 14 months' time.
    William Hill's 1/4 on a No vote is arguably better value, as LIAMT notes, when you look at the IPSOS-MORI poll with DKs taken out - 64& No, 34% Yes.

    That is just a huge mountain to climb, and as Peter Kellner said today, not much is changing, nor is it likely to change (opinions have hardened on both sides).

    if Kellner is right, 1/4 is a guaranteed return of 25% on your money, if you can tie it up for 7 months.
    Your view of the Osborne/Balls comments on currency union was correct. The purpose was not to convert opponents, but to harden opinion on the No side.

  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Now, given that the 2015 Budget is likely to the be start of the General Election campaign, Tories should be both afraid and reassured.

    Quite. Churchill remarked during WW1 that the commander of the grand fleet admiral Jellicoe was the 'only man who could lose the war in an afternoon.'

    That's sort of true of Osborne.
  • Options
    MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792

    I've just been invited to speak at IndyRef meeting the Scottish Parliament in April - a follow-up to one I did in Feb last year. Looking forward to it.

    Bloody English day tripper pontificating to Scots on Independence.

  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,242
    edited March 2014
    Do I detect the squishy sound of PB Unionists self-pleasuring over an moe static poll? I think I do.

    We Nats are still starstruck over last night's Oscars ceremony.

    http://tinyurl.com/p5t9qr3
  • Options

    Do I detect the squishy sound of PB Unionists self-pleasuring over an moe static poll? I think I do.

    We Nats are still starstruck over last night's Oscar's ceremony.

    http://tinyurl.com/p5t9qr3

    Do you think the SNP will issue a press release about this poll like they did for the Survation poll?
  • Options
    TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262

    Do I detect the squishy sound of PB Unionists self-pleasuring over an moe static poll? I think I do.

    We Nats are still starstruck over last night's Oscar's ceremony.

    http://tinyurl.com/p5t9qr3

    He must have heard about the free pizza.

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,561
    edited March 2014
    BIG NEWS OFCOM SAY UKIP ARE A MAJOR PARTY (FOR THE EUROS)

    We have consulted on an appropriate approach for determining the composition of the list of major parties ahead of the elections taking place on 22 May 2014.

    Our decision is that the United Kingdom Independence Party ("UKIP") should be added to the list of major parties in England and in Wales for the 2014 European Parliament elections.
    The practical effect of this decision is as follows:

    Broadcasters transmitting PEBs on a UK/Great Britain-wide basis (such as Channel 5 in the European Parliamentary elections) will be obliged to treat UKIP as a major party across the whole of England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain) as a whole.

    STV will not be required to treat UKIP as a major party for the purposes of broadcasting Scotland-only PEBs. This reflects the fact that UKIP has low levels of support in Scotland.

    However, ITV Wales will have to treat UKIP as a major party for the purposes of broadcasting Wales-only PEBs, reflecting the fact that UKIP has significant levels of support in Wales

    In news and current affairs election programming that focuses on the European Parliamentary elections across England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain) as a whole, UKIP will be treated as a major party across the whole of England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain). However, in news and current affairs election programming that focuses on the European Parliamentary elections in just Scotland, UKIP will not be treated as a major party in such programming.


    http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/major-political-parties-2014/statement?utm_source=updates&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=major-parties-2014
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,503
    I prefer to call HM Treasury 2012 as a 'budget for business'. As, indeed, did the Economist.

    I wonder if Osborne will knock off a couple of pennies off fuel-duty in the 2015 Budget?

    Whatever 'spare' cash he does have, you can bet your bottom pound he'll do something politically funky with it.

    I'd like (personally) to see reform on stamp-duty, but I'm not sure that passes the funk test.

  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,242

    Do I detect the squishy sound of PB Unionists self-pleasuring over an moe static poll? I think I do.

    We Nats are still starstruck over last night's Oscar's ceremony.

    http://tinyurl.com/p5t9qr3

    Do you think the SNP will issue a press release about this poll like they did for the Survation poll?
    They will take their lead from Bettertogether's actions after the Survation poll.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,983

    isam said:

    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
    Have you mixed up your yes/no there?

    Oh yeah I have! Oops!

    Sorry if you allocate the leanings of the unsure's, you get

    62.5 No
    37.5 Yes

    What was the question again?
  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,242
    edited March 2014
    SeanT said:

    Blah, blah, blah, I'm right, I'm right, I'm right

    The only person loudly predicting a substantial surge for Yes was...er...you.
  • Options

    Do I detect the squishy sound of PB Unionists self-pleasuring over an moe static poll? I think I do.

    We Nats are still starstruck over last night's Oscar's ceremony.

    http://tinyurl.com/p5t9qr3

    Do you think the SNP will issue a press release about this poll like they did for the Survation poll?
    They will take their lead from Bettertogether's actions after the Survation poll.
    I thought comparing the SNP to BetterTogether was sacrilegious?

    Anyhoo, I depart for Edinburgh tomorrow morning, by the end of Thursday I'll let you know how my taxi driver focus group is planning to vote.
  • Options
    richardDoddrichardDodd Posts: 5,472
    edited March 2014
    OGH..I do hope you will not be.. jetting in..jetting out..we will never hear the last of it ... please take the train
  • Options
    isam said:

    isam said:

    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
    Have you mixed up your yes/no there?

    Oh yeah I have! Oops!

    Sorry if you allocate the leanings of the unsure's, you get

    62.5 No
    37.5 Yes

    What was the question again?
    I once did a PB thread with the headline "Tories have a 7% lead with ICM", when in fact it was Labour with a 7% lead.

    Fortunately I managed to correct it before anyone noticed.
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited March 2014
    Financial markets taking a bit of a battering from the Ukrainian crisis but occasionally a thin shaft of light breaks through the clouds:

    Natural gas prices from the U.K. to Germany jumped amid escalating tension in Ukraine, the main transit route of the fuel from Russia to consumers in the west.

    U.K. gas for next-month delivery climbed as much as 10 percent, the biggest gain since September 2011, on the ICE Futures Europe exchange in London.


    Should do a little bit to help close our balance of payments deficit.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,503
    One for (anyone but) the Nats: why are BetterTogether struggling for cash?

    Surely they've got a pool of all Tory/Labour/LibDem donors to draw upon, plus big UK business, CBI affiliates and not to mention David Bowie.

    They should be rolling in it. Yet they've (apparently) failed to raise even half their £7m target.

    Meanwhile, 'Yes' is seemingly lapping it up from a couple of euromillions winners.

    It's a bit odd, to say the least.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,983
    The other day someone mentioned 60/40 No/Yes as being standard, and one of the Nats said standard was more like 58/42 and that the the trend is obvious

    So how is this not a big swing to no, given that is 62.5/37.5
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    I think another foray north of the border by Ozzie is in order.

    The SNP will be thrilled, Eck will likely self combust and then the polls will inch further away from YES.

    Yup, more "bullying". We Scots just luv it !!
  • Options
    The most important news of today, if not the year so far.

    This evening at 7.30pm on BBC1

    The BBC is set to announce the UK's 2014 Eurovision entrant, with rumours strongly suggesting it will be newcomer Molly Smitten-Downes.

    This year's contestant was chosen through the BBC's Introducing strand, which champions undiscovered talent.

    It marks a break with the UK's recent choices, which have relied on veteran names such as Bonnie Tyler and Engelbert Humperdinck.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-26414284
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    OGH..I do hope you will not be.. jetting in..jetting out..we will never hear the last of it ... please take the train

    Rest assured I've just booked my tickets on East Coast. First class return to Edinburgh from Bedfordshire - £89.

  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,503

    BIG NEWS OFCOM SAY UKIP ARE A MAJOR PARTY (FOR THE EUROS)

    We have consulted on an appropriate approach for determining the composition of the list of major parties ahead of the elections taking place on 22 May 2014.

    Our decision is that the United Kingdom Independence Party ("UKIP") should be added to the list of major parties in England and in Wales for the 2014 European Parliament elections.
    The practical effect of this decision is as follows:

    Broadcasters transmitting PEBs on a UK/Great Britain-wide basis (such as Channel 5 in the European Parliamentary elections) will be obliged to treat UKIP as a major party across the whole of England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain) as a whole.

    STV will not be required to treat UKIP as a major party for the purposes of broadcasting Scotland-only PEBs. This reflects the fact that UKIP has low levels of support in Scotland.

    However, ITV Wales will have to treat UKIP as a major party for the purposes of broadcasting Wales-only PEBs, reflecting the fact that UKIP has significant levels of support in Wales

    In news and current affairs election programming that focuses on the European Parliamentary elections across England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain) as a whole, UKIP will be treated as a major party across the whole of England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain). However, in news and current affairs election programming that focuses on the European Parliamentary elections in just Scotland, UKIP will not be treated as a major party in such programming.


    http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/major-political-parties-2014/statement?utm_source=updates&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=major-parties-2014

    Interesting ruling. This is UKIP's moment: can they live up to it?
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,561
    edited March 2014

    One for (anyone but) the Nats: why are BetterTogether struggling for cash?

    Surely they've got a pool of all Tory/Labour/LibDem donors to draw upon, plus big UK business, CBI affiliates and not to mention David Bowie.

    They should be rolling in it. Yet they've (apparently) failed to raise even half their £7m target.

    Meanwhile, 'Yes' is seemingly lapping it up from a couple of euromillions winners.

    It's a bit odd, to say the least.

    I did a piece on that two years ago

    Lib Dems don't have any money, there's no marginals for the Tories to win in Scotland, pragmatism will rule the day.

    If the other two unionist parties are unwilling and unable to contribute much, then it may fall to Labour to make up the shortfall, but with a General Election on the horizon, they may be forced to choose between two unappealing choices, spend money trying to keep one of their traditional heartlands in the Union, from their general election funds, or try and win a general election without one of their traditional heartlands.

    http://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2012/06/07/how-much-of-an-influence-will-money-have-on-the-independence-referendum/
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,983

    isam said:

    isam said:

    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
    Have you mixed up your yes/no there?

    Oh yeah I have! Oops!

    Sorry if you allocate the leanings of the unsure's, you get

    62.5 No
    37.5 Yes

    What was the question again?
    I once did a PB thread with the headline "Tories have a 7% lead with ICM", when in fact it was Labour with a 7% lead.

    Fortunately I managed to correct it before anyone noticed.
    I once priced up Celtic vs Motherwell spread markets, and put the Shirt Supremacy in as 29-32 Motherwell/Celtic...

    Fortunately I cowardly hid behind the palpable error rule when the first punter noticed the rick! (shame on me)
  • Options
    MonikerDiCanioMonikerDiCanio Posts: 5,792

    SeanT said:

    Blah, blah, blah, I'm right, I'm right, I'm right

    The only person loudly predicting a substantial surge for Yes was...er...you.
    And Eck;
    "A warning by Britain's three main political parties that they would rule out a currency union with an independent Scotland has "backfired in spectacular fashion", Alex Salmond has said.".

  • Options
    TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 40,242
    SeanT said:

    SeanT said:

    Blah, blah, blah, I'm right, I'm right, I'm right

    The only person loudly predicting a substantial surge for Yes was...er...you.
    My prediction was an initial emotional surge to Yes, then a swing back to No as the Undecideds got the jitters, and fell in to the Naw camp.

    So far I have been proved EXACTLY right. Unlike you.

    So yes, I'm right, I'm right, I'm right.

    You could do yourself a favour, save us all a lot of tedious swithering, and just meekly agree with everything I say from now on.
    Oh, I don't think I could lash myself to the wildly gyrating mast of your opinion.
  • Options
    MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    JackW said:

    I've just been invited to speak at IndyRef meeting the Scottish Parliament in April - a follow-up to one I did in Feb last year. Looking forward to it.

    Take your passport !!

    What exchange rate will I get for my hard-earned £s?

  • Options
    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
    Have you mixed up your yes/no there?

    Oh yeah I have! Oops!

    Sorry if you allocate the leanings of the unsure's, you get

    62.5 No
    37.5 Yes

    What was the question again?
    I once did a PB thread with the headline "Tories have a 7% lead with ICM", when in fact it was Labour with a 7% lead.

    Fortunately I managed to correct it before anyone noticed.
    I once priced up Celtic vs Motherwell spread markets, and put the Shirt Supremacy in as 29-32 Motherwell/Celtic...

    Fortunately I cowardly hid behind the palpable error rule when the first punter noticed the rick! (shame on me)
    I'm surprised bookies don't make more mistakes, when it comes to live/in play markets.
  • Options
    anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    BIG NEWS OFCOM SAY UKIP ARE A MAJOR PARTY (FOR THE EUROS)

    We have consulted on an appropriate approach for determining the composition of the list of major parties ahead of the elections taking place on 22 May 2014.

    Our decision is that the United Kingdom Independence Party ("UKIP") should be added to the list of major parties in England and in Wales for the 2014 European Parliament elections.
    The practical effect of this decision is as follows:

    Broadcasters transmitting PEBs on a UK/Great Britain-wide basis (such as Channel 5 in the European Parliamentary elections) will be obliged to treat UKIP as a major party across the whole of England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain) as a whole.

    STV will not be required to treat UKIP as a major party for the purposes of broadcasting Scotland-only PEBs. This reflects the fact that UKIP has low levels of support in Scotland.

    However, ITV Wales will have to treat UKIP as a major party for the purposes of broadcasting Wales-only PEBs, reflecting the fact that UKIP has significant levels of support in Wales

    In news and current affairs election programming that focuses on the European Parliamentary elections across England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain) as a whole, UKIP will be treated as a major party across the whole of England, Wales and Scotland (i.e. Great Britain). However, in news and current affairs election programming that focuses on the European Parliamentary elections in just Scotland, UKIP will not be treated as a major party in such programming.


    http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/major-political-parties-2014/statement?utm_source=updates&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=major-parties-2014

    Interesting ruling. This is UKIP's moment: can they live up to it?
    I'm wondering if the press can live up to it.

    UKIP want to have a debate about the EU in the run up to the EU Parliament elections, but political coverage in the UK seems to be focussed on 'gaffes'.
  • Options
    SeanT said:


    Oh FFS. I give up. You honestly don't believe that Russian speakers in Ukraine (of which there are 8.3m - almost 20% of the population) might actually and simply just want to be citizens of a country three times richer

    The GDP per capita is an average figure, and we should all know how misleading averages can be.

    How do the median Ukrainian and Russian incomes compare, adjusted for purchasing power parity? What about the 20th percentile and the 80th? Such comparisons will tell us whether the Russian people are really more prosperous, or whether the figures you cite are distorted by a small number of Russians with extremely high incomes, pulling their national average up.

  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,985

    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
    Have you mixed up your yes/no there?

    Oh yeah I have! Oops!

    Sorry if you allocate the leanings of the unsure's, you get

    62.5 No
    37.5 Yes

    What was the question again?
    I once did a PB thread with the headline "Tories have a 7% lead with ICM", when in fact it was Labour with a 7% lead.

    Fortunately I managed to correct it before anyone noticed.
    I once priced up Celtic vs Motherwell spread markets, and put the Shirt Supremacy in as 29-32 Motherwell/Celtic...

    Fortunately I cowardly hid behind the palpable error rule when the first punter noticed the rick! (shame on me)
    I'm surprised bookies don't make more mistakes, when it comes to live/in play markets.
    Aren't spreadbetting firms FSA related and so can't claim palps ?
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    The most important news of today, if not the year so far.

    This evening at 7.30pm on BBC1

    The BBC is set to announce the UK's 2014 Eurovision entrant, with rumours strongly suggesting it will be newcomer Molly Smitten-Downes.

    This year's contestant was chosen through the BBC's Introducing strand, which champions undiscovered talent.

    It marks a break with the UK's recent choices, which have relied on veteran names such as Bonnie Tyler and Engelbert Humperdinck.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-26414284

    With a name like Smitten-Downes it needs to be some tedious ballard ("Smitten Down By Love" etc etc)
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    OGH..I do hope you will not be.. jetting in..jetting out..we will never hear the last of it ... please take the train

    Rest assured I've just booked my tickets on East Coast. First class return to Edinburgh from Bedfordshire - £89.

    First class, really... how terribly Tory of you...
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,983
    Pulpstar said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    If you allocate the leanings of the undecided you get

    60 Yes
    36 No
    4 DK

    or

    62.5 Yes
    37.5 No
    Have you mixed up your yes/no there?

    Oh yeah I have! Oops!

    Sorry if you allocate the leanings of the unsure's, you get

    62.5 No
    37.5 Yes

    What was the question again?
    I once did a PB thread with the headline "Tories have a 7% lead with ICM", when in fact it was Labour with a 7% lead.

    Fortunately I managed to correct it before anyone noticed.
    I once priced up Celtic vs Motherwell spread markets, and put the Shirt Supremacy in as 29-32 Motherwell/Celtic...

    Fortunately I cowardly hid behind the palpable error rule when the first punter noticed the rick! (shame on me)
    I'm surprised bookies don't make more mistakes, when it comes to live/in play markets.
    Aren't spreadbetting firms FSA related and so can't claim palps ?
    No one told IG, SPIN or Spreadex!
  • Options
    AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    And here comes the totally unexpected bad news

    Russia’s gas giant Gazprom said on Monday it did not rule out possible disruptions of gas supplies to Europe over Ukraine’s political situation.

    “Simmering political tensions in Ukraine, that are aggravated by inadequate economic conditions, may cause disruptions of gas supplies to Europe,” the monopoly said in its materials, adding that it would do its utmost to reduce export risks. “We will further invest into other export-oriented projects such as South Stream and will enhance our LNG (liquefied natural gas) production and export capacity. We also increase our access to underground gas storage facilities in Europe.”


    Whoever thought that might happen?
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,503

    One for (anyone but) the Nats: why are BetterTogether struggling for cash?

    Surely they've got a pool of all Tory/Labour/LibDem donors to draw upon, plus big UK business, CBI affiliates and not to mention David Bowie.

    They should be rolling in it. Yet they've (apparently) failed to raise even half their £7m target.

    Meanwhile, 'Yes' is seemingly lapping it up from a couple of euromillions winners.

    It's a bit odd, to say the least.

    I did a piece on that two years ago

    Lib Dems don't have any money, there's no marginals for the Tories to win in Scotland, pragmatism will rule the day.

    If the other two unionist parties are unwilling and unable to contribute much, then it may fall to Labour to make up the shortfall, but with a General Election on the horizon, they may be forced to choose between two unappealing choices, spend money trying to keep one of their traditional heartlands in the Union, from their general election funds, or try and win a general election without one of their traditional heartlands.

    http://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2012/06/07/how-much-of-an-influence-will-money-have-on-the-independence-referendum/
    Sorry, TSE, I missed that post of yours. Your points make sense. I'm still not sure why more companies and private individuals aren't digging a little deeper though.

    I've donated £100 myself, and, I must admit, I feel a bit lonely. There must be a few thousand patriotric unionists, like me, in England/Wales (yet alone Scotland) willing to do their bit, surely?
  • Options
    Ben Page, Ipsos MORI ‏@benatipsosmori 22s

    Scottish independence does not seem to be getting any more likely - and recent polls not shifting pic.twitter.com/6CMC2wyDri
This discussion has been closed.