If Iowa is going to continue to benefit to the tune of many, many millions of dollars for this nonsense every 4 years they are really going to have to come up with a better product.
More often than not this proves to be a total shambles. The Democrats are already walking away. The GOP may do likewise.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
Caucuses, in Iowa or elsewhere, are a logistical challenge = major pain in the ass.
That is, IF the turnout is at all sizable. Speaking as one who has been there and done that, including presiding over my own precinct's caucus several times in Seattle.
Could NOT have done any policking even if I'd wanted to, was totally occupied getting things rolling, answering questions, conducting voting, counting votes, doing math, electing actual delegates to next level (legislative district), filling out paperwork, keeping kids happy with coloring books while they waited for mom/dad, etc., etc.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
And it will be dark, so they cant even admire Iowa’s stunning scenery on the way.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
I don't think that the Police were trying to prove that that Sutcliffe's work was infallible
That's exactly what the PO Lice did with Fujitsu's botched job
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
No that's Celsius. But cold enough to freeze balls off a brass monkey.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
Many many heads are going to roll for this, all over the place.
It's one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of this century.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
Oh, I agree, I'd take them to the cleaners; I just wonder if they're being used to avoid any deeper scrutiny of and changes to our public services. And they'll still come out significantly ahead due to future Government work.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
Many many heads are going to roll for this, all over the place.
It's one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of this century.
If Iowa is going to continue to benefit to the tune of many, many millions of dollars for this nonsense every 4 years they are really going to have to come up with a better product.
More often than not this proves to be a total shambles. The Democrats are already walking away. The GOP may do likewise.
Democrats HAVE walked away, the Iowa Democratic caucuses being nothing like in past, replaced by a more-or-less ordinary statewide vote, with the 2024 caucus meetings for chosing people who will cast convention votes based on the statewide . . . .though COULD be some funny business down the line.
Actually just two shambles since 1972, but likely at least one too many.
GOP have actually INCREASED number of caucuses for 2024, as overt strategy to aid Trump.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
Many many heads are going to roll for this, all over the place.
It's one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of this century.
Yes indeed.
We are going to see many getting their downfall. The mob has turned.
If Iowa is going to continue to benefit to the tune of many, many millions of dollars for this nonsense every 4 years they are really going to have to come up with a better product.
More often than not this proves to be a total shambles. The Democrats are already walking away. The GOP may do likewise.
This is true - I'm surprised Trump hasn't said the same thing, since he did not win Iowa in 2016, but he's gone the other route and just pretends that he did, not even that it was rigged (he said that too, beforehand), just pretends he won outright.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
Many many heads are going to roll for this, all over the place.
It's one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of this century.
Yes indeed.
We are going to see many getting their downfall. The mob has turned.
Maybe. Or, with the inquiry about to go into recess and the next big news story about to break, the person in the street will lose interest.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
No that's Celsius. But cold enough to freeze balls off a brass monkey.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
Doesn't sound right. It's not going to be -45 anywhere they have a caucus. Maybe we they refer to so called windchill temperatures which are rather like opinion polls with swingback.
As crazy as some of the rules, procedures, and events can be, I do kind of admire the sheer glut of democratic contests the US has, and all the caucuses, primaries (sometimes both), and myriad of elected officials for roles that really do not require it at all.
When it's not a year with the world's most hateful man trying to stay out of prison running with the support of 50% of the country that is.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
Many many heads are going to roll for this, all over the place.
It's one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of this century.
Yes indeed.
We are going to see many getting their downfall. The mob has turned.
Maybe. Or, with the inquiry about to go into recess and the next big news story about to break, the person in the street will lose interest.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
Many many heads are going to roll for this, all over the place.
It's one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of this century.
Yes indeed.
We are going to see many getting their downfall. The mob has turned.
Maybe. Or, with the inquiry about to go into recess and the next big news story about to break, the person in the street will lose interest.
No, I think this is the real thing.
The inquiry won’t report until mid 2025 at the earliest, so I hope people have sufficient patience.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
No that's Celsius. But cold enough to freeze balls off a brass monkey.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
Doesn't sound right. It's not going to be -45 anywhere they have a caucus. Maybe we they refer to so called windchill temperatures which are rather like opinion polls with swingback.
According to Weather Channel high temp in Des Moines forecast for Monday -3 F (-19 C) with estimated wind chill equivalent -14 F (-26 C)
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
No that's Celsius. But cold enough to freeze balls off a brass monkey.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
No that's Celsius. But cold enough to freeze balls off a brass monkey.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
Doesn't sound right. It's not going to be -45 anywhere they have a caucus. Maybe we they refer to so called windchill temperatures which are rather like opinion polls with swingback.
According to Weather Channel high temp in Des Moines forecast for Monday -3 F (-19 C) with estimated wind chill equivalent -14 F (-26 C)
Somewhere has to take more than its share of the cold, and it may as well be Des Moines.
Hindsight is wonderful, but if only they had scrapped Horizon back then.
It almost happened. This is the PO internal report from the time:
.
So, when this was proven in action and all the prosecutions started, why didn't New Labour get suspicious and start to ask questions?
One has to admire your unwavering valiant attempts to shift the blame for the PO Scandal onto 'anyone but the Tories'.
Unfortunately, your comprehension skills seem to have deserted you over this one. To put it simply that document has no direct bearing on the PO Scandal.
The concerns expressed in that document snippet are about ICL's ability to deliver the system. That it would have errors once delivered was, frankly, only to be expected.
The PO Scandal arose not because a system was delivered with errors but because a mendacious, vindictive, defensive management viciously pursued the 'we cannot be wrong' line to the point where many innocent people's lives were ruined.
Now, you may say that the 1997-2010 Labour government should have spotted that (and the same could be said for the administrations since) but that document does nothing to suggest The government of the time had evidence there was a fundamental problem with PO's management.
I'm interested in everyone involved taking accountability and responsibility.
But there are far too many on here who want it to only be about the Tories.
It's funny though how the name on the media's (and your) lips is only Davey though.
The focus on Davey is a big distraction from the bastards in the PO - the management, PR, legal, enforcement, IT. They are who we should be focusing on. How can we make sure they get screwed. EDIT And Fujitsu
I think Fujitsu are being lined up to bear the brunt of it, (snip)
That's like saying Peter Sutcliffe was being lined up to bear the consequences of being the Yorkshire Ripper.
Many many heads are going to roll for this, all over the place.
It's one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of this century.
Yes indeed.
We are going to see many getting their downfall. The mob has turned.
Maybe. Or, with the inquiry about to go into recess and the next big news story about to break, the person in the street will lose interest.
No, I think this is the real thing.
The inquiry won’t report until mid 2025 at the earliest, so I hope people have sufficient patience.
It won't dominate the news every week, but it will grab attention periodically all year.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
No that's Celsius. But cold enough to freeze balls off a brass monkey.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
Doesn't sound right. It's not going to be -45 anywhere they have a caucus. Maybe we they refer to so called windchill temperatures which are rather like opinion polls with swingback.
According to Weather Channel high temp in Des Moines forecast for Monday -3 F (-19 C) with estimated wind chill equivalent -14 F (-26 C)
Somewhere has to take more than its share of the cold, and it may as well be Des Moines.
"While heavy snowfall is moving out of central Iowa, winds will ensure difficult travel conditions stick around.
As of 3 p.m. Friday, at least seven stretches of highways in western Iowa and one in north central Iowa were listed as "impassable" by the Iowa Department of Transportation and most roads east of Interstate 35 were labeled as "travel not advised."
The National Weather Service warned that more roads were likely to become impassable as blizzard conditions continued in the state.
Snow started falling in Des Moines just before midnight on Thursday night. Here are the latest updates as blizzard conditions continue:
3:45 p.m: Wind chills not expected to reach positive numbers again until Wednesday Bundle up and stay indoors! The wind chill at 3:45 p.m. Friday had dipped to minus 4 and it's only going to get lower.
Wind chills are expected to dip into the negative 20s on Friday night and could reach as low as minus 45 degrees over the weekend."
All temperatures in Red Blooded American Fahrenheit, not that woke Celsius crap
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
Higher densities in Des Moines, Dubuque, Iowa City, etc., etc. but hardly crowded even in these sorta-urban centers.
Also note that Iowans are used to dealing with very cold weather every year. But also used to saying, heck with it, IF conditions are what THEY consider unsafe or downright dangerous.
You can bet your bottom dollar (or lowest pound) that phones are ringing like mad, txts pinging, etc. as campaign hacks, volunteers, work release inmates are calling their lists, and more than once, trying to convince the doubtful wealther-wise!
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
Higher densities in Des Moines, Dubuque, Iowa City, etc., etc. but hardly crowded even in these sorta-urban centers.
Also note that Iowans are used to dealing with very cold weather every year. But also used to saying, heck with it, IF conditions are what THEY consider unsafe or downright dangerous.
You can bet your bottom dollar (or lowest pound) that phones are ringing like mad, txts pinging, etc. as campaign hacks, volunteers, work release inmates are calling their lists, and more than once, trying to convince the doubtful wealther-wise!
It’s really noticeable how population density drops off so suddenly along a line half way across the US.
In fact 2 lines, the starkest one being at the edge of the Great Plains but a less marked but still clear one halfway across the Midwest.
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
We flew into somewhere in Iowa and drove to somewhere else.
I fell asleep in the car, passing an endless corn field.
I woke up an hour later passing an endless corn field.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
No that's Celsius. But cold enough to freeze balls off a brass monkey.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
Doesn't sound right. It's not going to be -45 anywhere they have a caucus. Maybe we they refer to so called windchill temperatures which are rather like opinion polls with swingback.
According to Weather Channel high temp in Des Moines forecast for Monday -3 F (-19 C) with estimated wind chill equivalent -14 F (-26 C)
Somewhere has to take more than its share of the cold, and it may as well be Des Moines.
When will Des Moines resign?
Isn't Des Moines a snooker commentator from West Bromwich East?
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
Higher densities in Des Moines, Dubuque, Iowa City, etc., etc. but hardly crowded even in these sorta-urban centers.
Also note that Iowans are used to dealing with very cold weather every year. But also used to saying, heck with it, IF conditions are what THEY consider unsafe or downright dangerous.
You can bet your bottom dollar (or lowest pound) that phones are ringing like mad, txts pinging, etc. as campaign hacks, volunteers, work release inmates are calling their lists, and more than once, trying to convince the doubtful wealther-wise!
On one of their long, straight main roads, I drove right through an intersection on red before I realised. Lucky escape.
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
We flew into somewhere in Iowa and drove to somewhere else.
I fell asleep in the car, passing an endless corn field.
I woke up an hour later passing an endless corn field.
It’s easy to understand why Bryson liked to travel.
I would have thought Haley or DeSantis supporters may be more likely to attend the caucuses and debate their candidates and then support them than Trump supporters. Trump supporters would turn out for him in a general election and in better weather probably in a primary too but are much less likely to want to travel through heavy snow and freezing temperatures to spend hours in a hall pushing him to others
I think Iowa is the coldest place I have ever been
-2F
Why? When? Where?
Waterloo. Work. 20 some years ago
Was in Waterloo, Iowa for one less-than-balmy January bit before that, as lowly field worker; was camped out in the basement of a Ceder Falls real estate agent who was supporting my candidate.
As practical matter, probably not many Republics gonna be waiting in line OUTSIDE on Monday night; Iowans are better organized than that; they generally find the counting more problematic than the weather.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
AP are saying it is going to be -45. I presume that is Fahrenheit but it doesn't make much difference at that sort of number. That is seriously cold. Not a night for being out driving. This is madness.
No that's Celsius. But cold enough to freeze balls off a brass monkey.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
Doesn't sound right. It's not going to be -45 anywhere they have a caucus. Maybe we they refer to so called windchill temperatures which are rather like opinion polls with swingback.
According to Weather Channel high temp in Des Moines forecast for Monday -3 F (-19 C) with estimated wind chill equivalent -14 F (-26 C)
Somewhere has to take more than its share of the cold, and it may as well be Des Moines.
When will Des Moines resign?
Isn't Des Moines a snooker commentator from West Bromwich East?
I think Iowa is the coldest place I have ever been
-2F
Why? When? Where?
Waterloo. Work. 20 some years ago
Was in Waterloo, Iowa for one less-than-balmy January bit before that, as lowly field worker; was camped out in the basement of a Ceder Falls real estate agent who was supporting my candidate.
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
We flew into somewhere in Iowa and drove to somewhere else.
I fell asleep in the car, passing an endless corn field.
I woke up an hour later passing an endless corn field.
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
Higher densities in Des Moines, Dubuque, Iowa City, etc., etc. but hardly crowded even in these sorta-urban centers.
Also note that Iowans are used to dealing with very cold weather every year. But also used to saying, heck with it, IF conditions are what THEY consider unsafe or downright dangerous.
You can bet your bottom dollar (or lowest pound) that phones are ringing like mad, txts pinging, etc. as campaign hacks, volunteers, work release inmates are calling their lists, and more than once, trying to convince the doubtful wealther-wise!
On one of their long, straight main roads, I drove right through an intersection on red before I realised. Lucky escape.
I did that once in Australia. Driving straight for so long you just cease to notice even stuff like other highways.
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
We flew into somewhere in Iowa and drove to somewhere else.
I fell asleep in the car, passing an endless corn field.
I woke up an hour later passing an endless corn field.
It’s easy to understand why Bryson liked to travel.
It’s also easy to understand, flying over Chicago and Westward over the plains, why SimCity looks like it does. The whole centre of the US looks like a computer sim game.
I think Iowa is the coldest place I have ever been
-2F
Why? When? Where?
Waterloo. Work. 20 some years ago
Was in Waterloo, Iowa for one less-than-balmy January bit before that, as lowly field worker; was camped out in the basement of a Ceder Falls real estate agent who was supporting my candidate.
Did you visit the Grout Museum?
Somehow missed that. Drat!
Did see Jesse Jackson address a large rally at a Black church in Waterloo, location of one of the larger concentrations of African Americans in Iowa. Which ain't saying much, but it they're there.
Cannot recall at this late date (like a PO Horizon Inquiry witness) whether JJ was pro- or anti-grout.
Re: Iowa, keep in mind that it is a sparsely-populated state, certainly by Eastern USA or UK standards.
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
Higher densities in Des Moines, Dubuque, Iowa City, etc., etc. but hardly crowded even in these sorta-urban centers.
Also note that Iowans are used to dealing with very cold weather every year. But also used to saying, heck with it, IF conditions are what THEY consider unsafe or downright dangerous.
You can bet your bottom dollar (or lowest pound) that phones are ringing like mad, txts pinging, etc. as campaign hacks, volunteers, work release inmates are calling their lists, and more than once, trying to convince the doubtful wealther-wise!
We're quite well-versed in all things Iowan here in the UK thanks to Bill Bryson.
Speaking of Waterloo, Iowa (doesn't everyone) recall the day (or rather evening) when I drove into town from Des Moines, a drive of several hours on semi-icy roads past very snowy fields.
Temperature had been dropping all day, and by the time I made Waterloo (pronounced "water-LOO" by locals) it was well below freezing. So cold in fact, that my car's humble radiator began freezing up; I was damn lucky to make it.
Especially as it was in the dim, distant days before cell phones; and in a land where you could (and still can) drive for miles before seeing a house, or an outhouse for that matter.
I think Iowa is the coldest place I have ever been
-2F
Why? When? Where?
Waterloo. Work. 20 some years ago
Was in Waterloo, Iowa for one less-than-balmy January bit before that, as lowly field worker; was camped out in the basement of a Ceder Falls real estate agent who was supporting my candidate.
Did you visit the Grout Museum?
There's a museum dedicated to 1950s/60s Australian wicket keeper Wally Grout? I must visit it sometime.
Speaking of Waterloo, Iowa (doesn't everyone) recall the day (or rather evening) when I drove into town from Des Moines, a drive of several hours on semi-icy roads past very snowy fields.
Temperature had been dropping all day, and by the time I made Waterloo (pronounced "water-LOO" by locals) it was well below freezing. So cold in fact, that my car's humble radiator began freezing up; I was damn lucky to make it.
Especially as it was in the dim, distant days before cell phones; and in a land where you could (and still can) drive for miles before seeing a house, or an outhouse for that matter.
If you let in more mexicans it wouldnt be so empty
The Grout Museum District – named after Henry W. Grout – is a set of museums in Waterloo, Iowa. The District consists of the Grout Museum of History & Science, Bluedorn Science Imaginarium, Rensselaer Russell House Museum, Snowden House and the Sullivan Brothers Iowa Veterans Museum.
It's a total coincidence that South Africa is making a splash at the International Court in The Hague, a few months before an election at which the ANC may lose its majority for the first time in 30 years, since democratic elections were introduced there.
The Grout Museum District – named after Henry W. Grout – is a set of museums in Waterloo, Iowa. The District consists of the Grout Museum of History & Science, Bluedorn Science Imaginarium, Rensselaer Russell House Museum, Snowden House and the Sullivan Brothers Iowa Veterans Museum.
The observation is exact. I’m coming round to the neologism
You have skipped an important point: their religious faith. The old Upper Ten Thousand had to be observant Church of England, at least ostensibly, with perhaps a few token Jews and Catholics
The NU10K have to be Woke; that is their belief system, which similarly binds them together
They also keep banging on about vegan food - I'm not joking.
I'm on a major committee for an organisation and they keep going on about it to demonstrate their commitment to climate change. So it's about only laying this on at their events and meetings. Because it's "progressive".
I struggle to challenge this in a calm way - it's very unpopular, and their members have said so - and, of course, you can end up looking like the difficult one / bogeyman even though you know many secretly agree.
The syphilis of Woke is entering its tertiary stage where it starts killing businesses, or people
TwiX is right now engulfed in debate at to how much Wokeness has contributed to the fall of Boeing. Turns out Boeing is extremely Woke and might have neglected - might - important safety aspects in pursuit of DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion)
Hard to say if the allegation is entirely accurate. There is certainly some evidence
Comments
More often than not this proves to be a total shambles. The Democrats are already walking away. The GOP may do likewise.
And folks may well start turning up, an being checked in, before 7pm. With actual voting not until then.
Essentially the caucuses are meetings. A few people will get up and make speeches, others will comment, most will be there just to fill out a ballot and drop it in the box.
IF turnout at a locality is heavy, could take a while to get past the ID checkers. But again these lines and waiting should be indoors.
Typically caucus meetings are held at schools and churches, normal election polling places. Or in peoples homes.
Also pretty common in some places to hold caucuses for several precincts at same location, say a high school with plenty of classrooms for meetings, or in an auditorium or school gym.
Reckon the REAL turnout issue, will be folks not wanting to drive too far from home that night. May be somewhat more of a factor in rural precincts, where the trip to & from caucus may be longer.
That is, IF the turnout is at all sizable. Speaking as one who has been there and done that, including presiding over my own precinct's caucus several times in Seattle.
Could NOT have done any policking even if I'd wanted to, was totally occupied getting things rolling, answering questions, conducting voting, counting votes, doing math, electing actual delegates to next level (legislative district), filling out paperwork, keeping kids happy with coloring books while they waited for mom/dad, etc., etc.
That's exactly what the PO Lice did with Fujitsu's botched job
I suspect Biden only wants to do the same.
Iowans are made of pretty stern stuff. But that stuff will be tested.
SO who has most dedicated supporters? Trump? Maybe. OR maybe not.
It's one of the greatest miscarriages of justice of this century.
Actually just two shambles since 1972, but likely at least one too many.
GOP have actually INCREASED number of caucuses for 2024, as overt strategy to aid Trump.
We are going to see many getting their downfall. The mob has turned.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/labour-leader-keir-starmer-says-28431692
When it's not a year with the world's most hateful man trying to stay out of prison running with the support of 50% of the country that is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ymjc3fO5xAg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDlBwf-CJPw
Anyone??
https://twitter.com/katz_mum/status/1745918289191018669/photo/1
"While heavy snowfall is moving out of central Iowa, winds will ensure difficult travel conditions stick around.
As of 3 p.m. Friday, at least seven stretches of highways in western Iowa and one in north central Iowa were listed as "impassable" by the Iowa Department of Transportation and most roads east of Interstate 35 were labeled as "travel not advised."
The National Weather Service warned that more roads were likely to become impassable as blizzard conditions continued in the state.
Snow started falling in Des Moines just before midnight on Thursday night. Here are the latest updates as blizzard conditions continue:
3:45 p.m: Wind chills not expected to reach positive numbers again until Wednesday
Bundle up and stay indoors! The wind chill at 3:45 p.m. Friday had dipped to minus 4 and it's only going to get lower.
Wind chills are expected to dip into the negative 20s on Friday night and could reach as low as minus 45 degrees over the weekend."
All temperatures in Red Blooded American Fahrenheit, not that woke Celsius crap
-2F
First time I was there, that's what struck me, coming from east of the Mississippi. Driving on main roads the towns AND hamlets were further apart, houses and farms in between these ditto, with fewer stores, gas stations, whatever.
Higher densities in Des Moines, Dubuque, Iowa City, etc., etc. but hardly crowded even in these sorta-urban centers.
Also note that Iowans are used to dealing with very cold weather every year. But also used to saying, heck with it, IF conditions are what THEY consider unsafe or downright dangerous.
You can bet your bottom dollar (or lowest pound) that phones are ringing like mad, txts pinging, etc. as campaign hacks, volunteers, work release inmates are calling their lists, and more than once, trying to convince the doubtful wealther-wise!
In fact 2 lines, the starkest one being at the edge of the Great Plains but a less marked but still clear one halfway across the Midwest.
I fell asleep in the car, passing an endless corn field.
I woke up an hour later passing an endless corn field.
Incredible, but Sunak is turning out to be a worse PM than Johnson.
Only the very greatest are not found out by the very top job.
The need for more capacity on the West coast line hasn’t gone away but he seems unduly keen to write it off.
Where’s the Kennedy speech? “We choose to go to Manchester. Not because it is easy, but because it is hard”,
https://insideradvantage.com/insideradvantage-iowa-gop-poll-post-christie-withdrawal-survey-shows-trumps-lead-holds-desantis-and-haley-tied/
Did see Jesse Jackson address a large rally at a Black church in Waterloo, location of one of the larger concentrations of African Americans in Iowa. Which ain't saying much, but it they're there.
Cannot recall at this late date (like a PO Horizon Inquiry witness) whether JJ was pro- or anti-grout.
Temperature had been dropping all day, and by the time I made Waterloo (pronounced "water-LOO" by locals) it was well below freezing. So cold in fact, that my car's humble radiator began freezing up; I was damn lucky to make it.
Especially as it was in the dim, distant days before cell phones; and in a land where you could (and still can) drive for miles before seeing a house, or an outhouse for that matter.
Something in both eyes.
The Grout Museum District – named after Henry W. Grout – is a set of museums in Waterloo, Iowa. The District consists of the Grout Museum of History & Science, Bluedorn Science Imaginarium, Rensselaer Russell House Museum, Snowden House and the Sullivan Brothers Iowa Veterans Museum.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grout_Museum
https://www.groutmuseumdistrict.org/?gclid=CjwKCAiA44OtBhAOEiwAj4gpOfaB6HtS8wdbWXmcj1L1KrLkJPVHwG1fQ8W7LcSuGhVJe3RNCTG3DRoC4SYQAvD_BwE
Am obliged to Scott for turning me on this the existence of something I didn't know existed.
However, I did know about the Sullivan Brothers, but had forgotten they came from Waterloo:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sullivan_brothers
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/jan/12/flagship-labour-plan-scrap-non-dom-tax-breaks?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Other