A difficult day for Starmer as well – politicalbetting.com
Labour confirms eight shadow ministers have left Keir Starmer's frontbench tonight over ceasefire vote.Including, Paula Barker, Rachel Hopkins, Afzal Khan, Sarah Owen, Jess Phillips, Yasmin Qureshi, Naz Shah and Andy Slaughter.
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
I don’t think it’s a big deal . This will all be forgotten by the next GE .
That could be wishful thinking. There's little sign that the Israel/Palestine question will decrease in salience in Western politics any time soon, particularly on the left.
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
I don’t think it’s a big deal . This will all be forgotten by the next GE .
This particular vote will be, but it's a sign of what awaits us when Labour is in government as unlike in 1997 when the party and Blair were pretty much aligned now we see a Labour Party that's way to to the left of its leader.
The median 2019 Conservative voter supports Starmer's position of support for Israel and opposition to a permanent ceasefire until Hamas are defeated even if the median 2019 Labour voter and Shadow Cabinet rebels don't. Starmer knows he needs defections from the former to win
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
I don’t think it’s a big deal . This will all be forgotten by the next GE .
That could be wishful thinking. There's little sign that the Israel/Palestine question will decrease in salience in Western politics any time soon, particularly on the left.
As I pointed out on the last thread, more Tory voters support the amendment than the government's own position.
"Steven Edginton @StevenEdginton 💥Anonymous Home Office official explains why no matter who is Home Secretary, Britain's borders will remain wide open:
"Despite our change in boss, when it comes to controlling Britain’s borders nothing will change. I know this because I have worked for some time as a civil servant on immigration policy, and – in my experience – no priority is further from the Home Office in 2023 than stopping the boats or cutting net migration."
I read the full Twitter piece, and I'm afraid I didn't believe it. If it wasn't anonymous, if a high level Home Office official quit, and went on the record, then that would be different, but the piece felt forced.
For a start, I wouldn't expect Home Office staff to go into meetings and pose the question "how do we cut immigration?", I would expect them to respond to requests for various options that are asked for by their political masters.
So: is said source saying that Ms Braverman did not ask for options? Or that the Civil Service did not provide her with them after she asked?
That it isn't couched in those terms makes me very suspicious of its veracity.
What is it about the account that you are calling a falsehood? We know that civil service productivity has fallen by 7.5%. You yourself are complaining about our slow rate of deciding asylum cases and sending unsuccessful claimants back. All this account does is lend colour to the facts we already know and which you have highlighted. Of course there is personal opinion being expressed (evidently the writer has a deplorable lack of reverence for microagression training), but that aside, I'm not sure what here is an active falsehood, or what the motivation for such a falsehood would even be. As for the anonymity, perhaps this person wishes to speak out but also needs an income? There are plenty of non-anonymous civil servants offering a similar portrayal.
I don't even know how you measure civil service productivity. Economic statistics use output (usually measured via sales, profits, etc.) and divide it by hours worked. What is the economic output of a civil servant*?
More seriously: you basically saying "this chimes with my existing beliefs". Which is, after all, how human brains work
And - sure - I'd probably find it more plausible (and more fitting with my existing beliefs) if it said the Civil Service were lazy and only ever did the minimum of what was asked of them.
But this piece does not chime with what I know about how the civil service operates. Maybe I'm wrong, but without it being backed up by - you know - someone going on the record, then I will err on the side of caution.
* And, yes I do know how it is measured for national income reporting perspectives, but that isn't going to help here
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
I don’t think it’s a big deal . This will all be forgotten by the next GE .
This particular vote will be, but it's a sign of what awaits us when Labour is in government as unlike in 1997 when the party and Blair were pretty much aligned now we see a Labour Party that's way to to the left of its leader.
Though the new intake of up to 200 rookie MPs are likely to be Starmerite.
FPT, but possibly on topic: Well, the abuse of Israelis on October 7th wasn't "domestic", so perhaps Jess Philips feels that isn't her department. (I would disagree with her, since I think Hamas is now abusing Gazans by using them as human shields.)
FPT, but possibly on topic: Well, the abuse of Israelis on October 7th wasn't "domestic", so perhaps Jess Philips feels that isn't her department. (I would disagree with her, since I think Hamas is now abusing Gazans by using them as human shields.)
BTW, we do all know that small boat crossing have dropped dramatically this year, right?
At the beginning of the year, Ms Braverman warned that 85,000 people might come by boats this year, roughly double the number in 2022.
As of 11 November, we're at 27,314. So, instead of doubling this year, we're going to be down around about 40%.
Why?
Partly because the French have been a bit more helpful, and partly because we now do a much better job of returning Albanians. Ms Bravermam should be shouting from the rafters about how she's dramatically cut the number of boat arrivals, But that doesn't fit her narrative.
How can Albania - a country which is neither large, next door to us, or at war - have been responsible for quite so many migrants?
Because criminal gangs are well tapped in there and they found a loophole in the small print to enable economic migrants to claim asylum en masse.
Anyone can *claim* asylum.
The key is to ensure that (a) people are processed and deported rapidly if asylum is rejected, and (b) that they do not disappear into the local informal economy along the way.
Upscaled pro rata by population it would be about 3,700 in the UK.
This is what completely baffles me. Rather than invest £140m+ in Rwanda, why not just make the f*cking asylum system work? Buy in the Norwegian or Dutch teams to show us how to do it properly, if necessary.
The stuff quoted up thread about nothing being done in the Home Office.
Strip out the partisan stuff - 6 months into the Starmer gov the Labourites here will be complaining of the same things.
Why do I say that? Read the memoirs of Home Secs going back to the 1960s….
You may well be right... but I can't wait to find out.
We shall see - but until the system is changed, I don’t see why the results would change.
OT, it’s surprising that the Israel v Switzerland Euro 24 qualifier is being played in Hungary, and even more so in Orban’s favoured stadium across the road from his holiday home. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancho_Aréna
Today is a perfect example of what a Starmer government will be like: forget domestic concerns, what we need to get right is Palestine.
For all his general abject uselessness, Starmer did the right thing today. Don't forget for most left wing Labourites, power is a price worth paying for idealogical purity.
Dyed in the wool socialists would prefer to keep their hands clean and carp about your lot remaining in power and trashing anything else they haven't yet trashed.
OT, it’s surprising that the Israel v Switzerland Euro 24 qualifier is being played in Hungary, and even more so in Orban’s favoured stadium across the road from his holiday home. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancho_Aréna
On Sunday, Kosovo hosted Israel in Prishtina, and beat them 1-0.
Today is a perfect example of what a Starmer government will be like: forget domestic concerns, what we need to get right is Palestine.
What did Richi do today?
forget domestic concerns, what we need to get right is Rwanda...
EDIT: At least Starmer recognised we can't vote a fix for Palestine, unlike Richi
And bearing in mind Rwanda was a key plank of Operation Save Big Dog, it seems an odd hill on which to sacrifice our nation, particularly as Big Dog has already been put down.
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
I don’t think it’s a big deal . This will all be forgotten by the next GE .
This particular vote will be, but it's a sign of what awaits us when Labour is in government as unlike in 1997 when the party and Blair were pretty much aligned now we see a Labour Party that's way to to the left of its leader.
All politics is relative. the choice is between two sub-optimal outfits. Nothing about Labour, or this vote tonight, suggests that they approach the Tories in the useless rabble stakes.
Anyway, the votes are meaningless, and those voting for a ceasefire are not acting in some deeply unprincipled way on the whole. There are no good options in Israel/Gaza, and those voting for a ceasefire are not SFAICS saying that Hamas is all good and IDF all bad.
Today is a perfect example of what a Starmer government will be like: forget domestic concerns, what we need to get right is Palestine.
What did Richi do today?
forget domestic concerns, what we need to get right is Rwanda...
EDIT: At least Starmer recognised we can't vote a fix for Palestine, unlike Richi
And bearing in mind Rwanda was a key plank of Operation Save Big Dog, it seems an odd hill on which to sacrifice our nation, particularly as Big Dog has already been put down.
Not put down. Has to be in muzzle, castrated, kept indoors, etc. by 1 January or whenever it is.
There’s not a single grown-up among them, is there? It’s government by the smallest, pettiest, thickest individuals our country has had the misfortune to produce.
@HXValley "The beaches are open, everyone is having a wonderful time, and the town council has just passed a motion barring ANY Great Whites from within 3 miles of the coast."
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
I don’t think it’s a big deal . This will all be forgotten by the next GE .
Obviously rebellions are not ideal and Starmer made an early flub that has caused him issues, but I don't it plays out too badly for Starmer. Can say he took on his party on, on an issue of security when it was difficult. Other than Phillips, hasn't lost anyone particularly important or dangerous.
Largely swallowed up by the Rwanda news and Suella - it's not had/going to have the days of psychodrama in the press that it might have had in a slow news week.
A rebellion of 58 is pretty large - but Blair, with an admittedly larger PLP faced similar sized ones in his first term over Welfare Reform. And this is an emotive issue where voting for the nice sounding performative thing has virtually no consequences. Even those who've resigned will be back soon enough if Starmer and his team rate them. Only so much arm twisting or bribing sceptical MPs whips could do, or would be prepared to.
Plus, as much as the left are enjoying bashing Starmer because they think they've found an issue which recaptures Corbynism's essence, they might be overplaying their hand. It was notable that even some who are pretty right on with all that expressed disgust at Corbyn's ludicrous appearance on Piers Morgan.
OT, it’s surprising that the Israel v Switzerland Euro 24 qualifier is being played in Hungary, and even more so in Orban’s favoured stadium across the road from his holiday home. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancho_Aréna
On Sunday, Kosovo hosted Israel in Prishtina, and beat them 1-0.
Ah, I see Orban was probably doing his buddy Netanyahu a favour and bolstering his anti Muslim stance int the bargain.
@HXValley "The beaches are open, everyone is having a wonderful time, and the town council has just passed a motion barring ANY Great Whites from within 3 miles of the coast."
What do you mean, "Great Whites"? Parliament has simply declared they are harmless, friendly giant turtles, so that's how it is.
OK, I might have been wrong. My assumption was that any move Rishi made from his perfectly calibrated equilibrium would lose roughly as many votes on one side as it gained on the other.
I didn't allow for the possibility that he would manage to annoy both ends of his coalition at the same time.
(See Rwanda, where Rishi looks set to piss off the centrists by continuing to talk about the madness and the right by failing to deport anyone.)
OK, I might have been wrong. My assumption was that any move Rishi made from his perfectly calibrated equilibrium would lose roughly as many votes on one side as it gained on the other.
I didn't allow for the possibility that he would manage to annoy both ends of his coalition at the same time.
(See Rwanda, where Rishi looks set to piss off the centrists by continuing to talk about the madness and the right by failing to deport anyone.)
If the Tories start to poll consistently in the teens then there will be a real opportunity for a more professional insurgent party on the right to emerge, like Farage in the 2019 European elections but targetting Westminster.
Now where am I? I fully sympathise with the Labour rebels. Am I in the wrong party?
Me to. As I replied to Owen Smith's latest email asking for a donation 'I support Labour because their heart is in the right place. With Keir Starmer it isn't anymore. No more emails please".
Ah - a bad night for Starmer but I'm not sure how he could have avoided it without worse consequences. Sometimes you just have to take your punishment. His reaction will be interesting. Maybe he will throw a temper tantrum and double down on the course of his problems. Nah - no serious politician would do that, would they?
Ah - a bad night for Starmer but I'm not sure how he could have avoided it without worse consequences. Sometimes you just have to take your punishment. His reaction will be interesting. Maybe he will throw a temper tantrum and double down on the course of his problems. Nah - no serious politician would do that, would they?
Keir Starmer: "I regret that some colleagues felt unable to support the position tonight. But I wanted to be clear about where I stood, and where I will stand. Leadership is about doing the right thing. That is the least the public deserves. And the least that leadership demands.
There’s not a single grown-up among them, is there? It’s government by the smallest, pettiest, thickest individuals our country has had the misfortune to produce.
I've given up. It's like watching a gaggle of seals slapping their keyboards with their flippers whilst honking. They're grown adults but politics has done something weird to them. Aaargh, I give up. Nod, smile, yes prime minister, can I go now please?
Until today I thought it was EXTREMELY unlikely Sunak could face a challenge. But his reshuffle is so obviously catastrophic - and the Rwanda debacle only makes it worse - I believe he is now at risk
I mean: Lord David Cameron. FFS
On the same day you sack a totemic figure of the right, guaranteeing civil war in the party
Two more polls like this and he’s in deep shit. Because, the Tories have nothing to lose. They are facing actual extinction. Under 50 seats
Kick out Sunak put a proper right winger in and go down fighting with, at least, some honour
Now where am I? I fully sympathise with the Labour rebels. Am I in the wrong party?
Me to. As I replied to Owen Smith's latest email asking for a donation 'I support Labour because their heart is in the right place. With Keir Starmer it isn't anymore. No more emails please".
Roger, whereas I understand your pain, what on earth would demanding a ceasefire between Bibi and Hamas achieve? 1. Bibi doesn't want a ceasefire, and 2. Hamas don't want a ceasefire.
Arguing for humanitarian pauses is realistically the best one can hope for.
By sacking Braverman and appointing Cameron, Sunak has taken the Tories to the edge of utter extinction
While I agree that appointing Cameron was a mistake, you're missing the fact that Ms Braverman was desperate to get sacked.
If it didn't happen over this, there would be something else. And if that failed, she'd quit, claiming that she had been stymied in all her attempts to limit immigration by Number 10.
By sacking Braverman and appointing Cameron, Sunak has taken the Tories to the edge of utter extinction
While I agree that appointing Cameron was a mistake, you're missing the fact that Ms Braverman was desperate to get sacked.
If it didn't happen over this, there would be something else. And if that failed, she'd quit, claiming that she had been stymied in all her attempts to limit immigration by Number 10.
If the Tories start to poll consistently in the teens then there will be a real opportunity for a more professional insurgent party on the right to emerge, like Farage in the 2019 European elections but targetting Westminster.
Well, consistent teen figures are not going to happen, and besides Farage is off grid earning £1.5million and eating wombat scrotum.
OK, I might have been wrong. My assumption was that any move Rishi made from his perfectly calibrated equilibrium would lose roughly as many votes on one side as it gained on the other.
I didn't allow for the possibility that he would manage to annoy both ends of his coalition at the same time.
(See Rwanda, where Rishi looks set to piss off the centrists by continuing to talk about the madness and the right by failing to deport anyone.)
As a centrist Tory voter by long inclination, for about an hour yesterday, following Braverman going and Cameron returning, I wondered if at some point I should give the Tories a brief look to see if they had been discharged from the asylum yet and it was safe to emerge from the bunker provided by a sane Labour leader.
It isn't. A huge responsibility rests on the top tier of centrist Labour MPs to provide a party capable of modestly decent government.
Now where am I? I fully sympathise with the Labour rebels. Am I in the wrong party?
Me to. As I replied to Owen Smith's latest email asking for a donation 'I support Labour because their heart is in the right place. With Keir Starmer it isn't anymore. No more emails please".
LOL! Roger has already had it with SKS and he's not even in power!
OK, I might have been wrong. My assumption was that any move Rishi made from his perfectly calibrated equilibrium would lose roughly as many votes on one side as it gained on the other.
I didn't allow for the possibility that he would manage to annoy both ends of his coalition at the same time.
(See Rwanda, where Rishi looks set to piss off the centrists by continuing to talk about the madness and the right by failing to deport anyone.)
So, in other words, Leon was right?
Yes and no.
Events of this week (what do you mean, it's only Wednesday?) have left Sunak in a worse position than he was in on Monday. But sacking Suella was still the right, necessary thing to do- partly because of her likely response to today's news, but also because she has got to the "child who wants to be expelled/employee who want to be sacked" stage, and that always ends badly.
But also, Sunak doesn't seem to have the courage of his convictions, whatever they are. Centre rightist (bringing back Dave, saying 'oh well never mind' about Rwanda) would work. So would doubling down on 2016 populism.
Whatever the f&@k he's trying to do (I'm reminded of the Moleswoeth 'you boys may think I'm soft, but I'm hard... Dashed hard' cartoon) is somehow the worst of both worlds.
Now where am I? I fully sympathise with the Labour rebels. Am I in the wrong party?
Me to. As I replied to Owen Smith's latest email asking for a donation 'I support Labour because their heart is in the right place. With Keir Starmer it isn't anymore. No more emails please".
Do you want the good news or the bad news first Sir Keir?
Good news is you've got a 27pp poll lead. Bad news is some old fart on PB.com isn't prepared to shell out a fiver from his pension.
So I'll prepare your tearful resignation speech, shall I?
Now where am I? I fully sympathise with the Labour rebels. Am I in the wrong party?
Me to. As I replied to Owen Smith's latest email asking for a donation 'I support Labour because their heart is in the right place. With Keir Starmer it isn't anymore. No more emails please".
I honestly don’t understand why Starmer insisted on this party position. The vote doesn’t matter, so what was the harm in allowing Labour MPs the freedom to vote with their conscience?
Earlier one might have argued that it was a great opportunity for Starmer to push out the last of the Momentum crew by forcing them to take a stand commensurate with their obsession with Palestinian politics to the exclusion of actual UK politics, but after weeks of bombing we’re far beyond that point now & it’s only going to get worse from here on in as the deaths on the ground continue to mount.
By sacking Braverman and appointing Cameron, Sunak has taken the Tories to the edge of utter extinction
While I agree that appointing Cameron was a mistake, you're missing the fact that Ms Braverman was desperate to get sacked.
If it didn't happen over this, there would be something else. And if that failed, she'd quit, claiming that she had been stymied in all her attempts to limit immigration by Number 10.
He should have just ignored the Guardian. Fuck the libs. Let Suella be Suella
Also: let her own the Rwanda decision and let her try and fix it. Instead he sacked her three days BEFORE the judgment so she looks completely vindicated and he gets all the shit
He’s dragged the Tories to the edge of a mighty cliff. He’s really really bad at politics. Appoint Cameron, sack Braverman? Genius, not
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
Rishi should use the sovereign parliament to award himself another five years via an act of parliament.
No need to suspend democracy. Simply get Parliament to declare they've won an election, which apparently makes it a fact for some reason.
Amusing, but not really what was being argued since it'd be about interpretation of facts or application of rules to the facts, as you yourself noted. Some matters are a judgement call on acceptability which might be able to be messed about with, whereas who won an election is much harder to ignore (but easier than declaring the sun sets in the wrong direction).
🌹 Lab 46% (+2) 🌳 Con 19% (-4) 🔶 Lib Dem 9% (-1) ➡️ Reform 10% (+2) 🌍 Greens 8% (+1) 🎗️ SNP 5% (+1)
Imagine the clamor to bring Boris back if he was still in Parliament lol!
I still don't really get why he flounced. He might have won the by-election, sticking it to his critics in and out of parliament, and he could set himself up ready to take over instantly. Sure there was risk of loss, but he could still have used the stitch up line and blame Rishi for the party being in the doldrums sinking him.
Anyway I'm more concerned by SNP back at 5%, that should be more worrying for Keir as well - at this rate he would win anyway, but his job will be much easier if he can gain back loads in Scotland.
🌹 Lab 46% (+2) 🌳 Con 19% (-4) 🔶 Lib Dem 9% (-1) ➡️ Reform 10% (+2) 🌍 Greens 8% (+1) 🎗️ SNP 5% (+1)
Tory fightback from last night, only the 27pt deficit now. Onwards and upwards!
For all the salivating over polls, there are some counter points. One, the vast majority of the public wouldn’t recognise Starmer. They pay little to no attention to politics until the election. Reform are not going to get 10%. Polls always narrow with the election campaign.
I am appalled by the indiscipline of the labour rebels. They stand on the brink of actually being able to do something for the first time in 13 years and they throw their toys out of the pram over words. Idiots.
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
Rishi should use the sovereign parliament to award himself another five years via an act of parliament.
No need to suspend democracy. Simply get Parliament to declare they've won an election, which apparently makes it a fact for some reason.
Amusing, but not really what was being argued since it'd be about interpretation of facts or application of rules to the facts, as you yourself noted. Some matters are a judgement call on acceptability which might be able to be messed about with, whereas who won an election is much harder to ignore (but easier than declaring the sun sets in the wrong direction).
🌹 Lab 46% (+2) 🌳 Con 19% (-4) 🔶 Lib Dem 9% (-1) ➡️ Reform 10% (+2) 🌍 Greens 8% (+1) 🎗️ SNP 5% (+1)
Imagine the clamor to bring Boris back if he was still in Parliament lol!
I still don't really get why he flounced. He might have won the by-election, sticking it to his critics in and out of parliament, and he could set himself up ready to take over instantly. Sure there was risk of loss, but he could still have used the stitch up line and blame Rishi for the party being in the doldrums sinking him.
Anyway I'm more concerned by SNP back at 5%, that should be more worrying for Keir as well - at this rate he would win anyway, but his job will be much easier if he can gain back loads in Scotland.
Bringing back David Duke of Brexit was always likely to annoy Scots
By sacking Braverman and appointing Cameron, Sunak has taken the Tories to the edge of utter extinction
While I agree that appointing Cameron was a mistake, you're missing the fact that Ms Braverman was desperate to get sacked.
If it didn't happen over this, there would be something else. And if that failed, she'd quit, claiming that she had been stymied in all her attempts to limit immigration by Number 10.
He should have just ignored the Guardian. Fuck the libs. Let Suella be Suella
Also: let her own the Rwanda decision and let her try and fix it. Instead he sacked her three days BEFORE the judgment so she looks completely vindicated and he gets all the shit
He’s dragged the Tories to the edge of a mighty cliff. He’s really really bad at politics. Appoint Cameron, sack Braverman? Genius, not
Is there any line that you wouldn't have wanted Suella to cross?
Giving Rishi a twirling wedgie during the King's Speech?
Proposing the abolition the Royal Family because they're all bloody Germans?
Because she had got to the point that she was prepared to do whatever it took to be sacked. There's no good way of managing people like that.
Tories imploding but Labour aren't close to being ready for government...
This country is in deep trouble.
Rishi should use the sovereign parliament to award himself another five years via an act of parliament.
No need to suspend democracy. Simply get Parliament to declare they've won an election, which apparently makes it a fact for some reason.
Amusing, but not really what was being argued since it'd be about interpretation of facts or application of rules to the facts, as you yourself noted. Some matters are a judgement call on acceptability which might be able to be messed about with, whereas who won an election is much harder to ignore (but easier than declaring the sun sets in the wrong direction).
🌹 Lab 46% (+2) 🌳 Con 19% (-4) 🔶 Lib Dem 9% (-1) ➡️ Reform 10% (+2) 🌍 Greens 8% (+1) 🎗️ SNP 5% (+1)
Imagine the clamor to bring Boris back if he was still in Parliament lol!
I still don't really get why he flounced. He might have won the by-election, sticking it to his critics in and out of parliament, and he could set himself up ready to take over instantly. Sure there was risk of loss, but he could still have used the stitch up line and blame Rishi for the party being in the doldrums sinking him.
Anyway I'm more concerned by SNP back at 5%, that should be more worrying for Keir as well - at this rate he would win anyway, but his job will be much easier if he can gain back loads in Scotland.
Is the SNP rise partly a result of large numbers of 2019 Con saying DK and inflating all the other parties' shares?
OK, I might have been wrong. My assumption was that any move Rishi made from his perfectly calibrated equilibrium would lose roughly as many votes on one side as it gained on the other.
I didn't allow for the possibility that he would manage to annoy both ends of his coalition at the same time.
(See Rwanda, where Rishi looks set to piss off the centrists by continuing to talk about the madness and the right by failing to deport anyone.)
So, in other words, Leon was right?
Yes and no.
Events of this week (what do you mean, it's only Wednesday?) have left Sunak in a worse position than he was in on Monday. But sacking Suella was still the right, necessary thing to do- partly because of her likely response to today's news, but also because she has got to the "child who wants to be expelled/employee who want to be sacked" stage, and that always ends badly.
But also, Sunak doesn't seem to have the courage of his convictions, whatever they are. Centre rightist (bringing back Dave, saying 'oh well never mind' about Rwanda) would work. So would doubling down on 2016 populism.
Whatever the f&@k he's trying to do (I'm reminded of the Moleswoeth 'you boys may think I'm soft, but I'm hard... Dashed hard' cartoon) is somehow the worst of both worlds.
This can't last another year, can it?
That's the issue isn't it? You can limit the damage at a GE, possibly even squeeze into Hung Parliament territory with a fair wind, if you do one thing or the other. Either appoint people like Cameron, resile from the grosser populism and play off Home Counties liberal Tories' old loyalties and scepticism about Labour, or go full Lee Anderthal blood and thunder right-wing.
At the moment he's in the worst of all worlds, as liberal centre right and right voters see the noisy (un)populism, and the noisy populists see a failed establishment full of hot air.
🌹 Lab 46% (+2) 🌳 Con 19% (-4) 🔶 Lib Dem 9% (-1) ➡️ Reform 10% (+2) 🌍 Greens 8% (+1) 🎗️ SNP 5% (+1)
Tory fightback from last night, only the 27pt deficit now. Onwards and upwards!
For all the salivating over polls, there are some counter points. One, the vast majority of the public wouldn’t recognise Starmer. They pay little to no attention to politics until the election. Reform are not going to get 10%. Polls always narrow with the election campaign.
I am appalled by the indiscipline of the labour rebels. They stand on the brink of actually being able to do something for the first time in 13 years and they throw their toys out of the pram over words. Idiots.
Polls generally narrow towards an election, and pretty much always do when one side has a substantial lead, but they're not doing at the moment and haven't done since Sunak became PM, since when they've wobbled around Lab+20, give or take a bit. Even if they narrow to Lab+15 - not least due to Ref-Con switching - that still gives Labour a landslide, particularly as the opposition vote would likely split very efficiently.
What Sunak should do now - to cunningly reverse expectations - is sack the unpopular Foreign Secretary, David Duke of Brexit, and - yes - appoint totemic and articulate right winger Suella Braverman, as maybe Home Secretary - and tell her to simply do whatever it takes to sort the boats
That would stop Cameron annoying the Remainers by his mere continued existence, and also win back the right wing votes he is losing to Reform. Could be a game changer
🌹 Lab 46% (+2) 🌳 Con 19% (-4) 🔶 Lib Dem 9% (-1) ➡️ Reform 10% (+2) 🌍 Greens 8% (+1) 🎗️ SNP 5% (+1)
Tory fightback from last night, only the 27pt deficit now. Onwards and upwards!
For all the salivating over polls, there are some counter points. One, the vast majority of the public wouldn’t recognise Starmer. They pay little to no attention to politics until the election. Reform are not going to get 10%. Polls always narrow with the election campaign.
I am appalled by the indiscipline of the labour rebels. They stand on the brink of actually being able to do something for the first time in 13 years and they throw their toys out of the pram over words. Idiots.
Agreed. It was a dumb move. But likely to be forgotten in a few days.
By sacking Braverman and appointing Cameron, Sunak has taken the Tories to the edge of utter extinction
While I agree that appointing Cameron was a mistake, you're missing the fact that Ms Braverman was desperate to get sacked.
If it didn't happen over this, there would be something else. And if that failed, she'd quit, claiming that she had been stymied in all her attempts to limit immigration by Number 10.
He should have just ignored the Guardian. Fuck the libs. Let Suella be Suella
Also: let her own the Rwanda decision and let her try and fix it. Instead he sacked her three days BEFORE the judgment so she looks completely vindicated and he gets all the shit
He’s dragged the Tories to the edge of a mighty cliff. He’s really really bad at politics. Appoint Cameron, sack Braverman? Genius, not
Is there any line that you wouldn't have wanted Suella to cross?
Giving Rishi a twirling wedgie during the King's Speech?
Proposing the abolition the Royal Family because they're all bloody Germans?
Because she had got to the point that she was prepared to do whatever it took to be sacked. There's no good way of managing people like that.
She was a bit mean to homeless people. That’s it
She was also absolutely right on a series of crucial issues and - more importantly - was apparently the only Tory politician with the balls to say this stuff out loud. She was - as I say - totemic
By sacking Braverman and appointing Cameron, Sunak has taken the Tories to the edge of utter extinction
While I agree that appointing Cameron was a mistake, you're missing the fact that Ms Braverman was desperate to get sacked.
If it didn't happen over this, there would be something else. And if that failed, she'd quit, claiming that she had been stymied in all her attempts to limit immigration by Number 10.
He should have just ignored the Guardian. Fuck the libs. Let Suella be Suella
Also: let her own the Rwanda decision and let her try and fix it. Instead he sacked her three days BEFORE the judgment so she looks completely vindicated and he gets all the shit
He’s dragged the Tories to the edge of a mighty cliff. He’s really really bad at politics. Appoint Cameron, sack Braverman? Genius, not
As a Labour supporter, surely you should be happy to see your opponents in disarray?
What Sunak should do now - to cunningly reverse expectations - is sack the unpopular Foreign Secretary, David Duke of Brexit, and - yes - appoint totemic and articulate right winger Suella Braverman, as maybe Home Secretary - and tell her to simply do whatever it takes to sort the boats
That would stop Cameron annoying the Remainers by his mere continued existence, and also win back the right wing votes he is losing to Reform. Could be a game changer
That personal bar in your hotel room you showed us earlier would appear to need replenishment by your butler.
What Sunak should do now - to cunningly reverse expectations - is sack the unpopular Foreign Secretary, David Duke of Brexit, and - yes - appoint totemic and articulate right winger Suella Braverman, as maybe Home Secretary - and tell her to simply do whatever it takes to sort the boats
That would stop Cameron annoying the Remainers by his mere continued existence, and also win back the right wing votes he is losing to Reform. Could be a game changer
How important do you think the issue of domestic abuse is if you are willing to forsake your direct involvement in trying to prevent it for a vote on Gaza ffs.
Now where am I? I fully sympathise with the Labour rebels. Am I in the wrong party?
Me to. As I replied to Owen Smith's latest email asking for a donation 'I support Labour because their heart is in the right place. With Keir Starmer it isn't anymore. No more emails please".
I honestly don’t understand why Starmer insisted on this party position. The vote doesn’t matter, so what was the harm in allowing Labour MPs the freedom to vote with their conscience?
Earlier one might have argued that it was a great opportunity for Starmer to push out the last of the Momentum crew by forcing them to take a stand commensurate with their obsession with Palestinian politics to the exclusion of actual UK politics, but after weeks of bombing we’re far beyond that point now & it’s only going to get worse from here on in as the deaths on the ground continue to mount.
Because Starmer is auditioning for government, and although this vote was thoroughly meaningless, there will be ones that won't be ahead. Give a free vote and you risk showing if you really aren't in control of your party, and raise the question about why you won't allow it in government - when it will actually matter.
If the Tories start to poll consistently in the teens then there will be a real opportunity for a more professional insurgent party on the right to emerge, like Farage in the 2019 European elections but targetting Westminster.
Well, consistent teen figures are not going to happen, and besides Farage is off grid earning £1.5million and eating wombat scrotum.
Nah, at this rate Tories on single figures by Christmas...
Comments
This country is in deep trouble.
Aaron Bastani
@AaronBastani
·
3m
Aspire winning an MP just became that little bit more likely....
More seriously: you basically saying "this chimes with my existing beliefs". Which is, after all, how human brains work
And - sure - I'd probably find it more plausible (and more fitting with my existing beliefs) if it said the Civil Service were lazy and only ever did the minimum of what was asked of them.
But this piece does not chime with what I know about how the civil service operates. Maybe I'm wrong, but without it being backed up by - you know - someone going on the record, then I will err on the side of caution.
* And, yes I do know how it is measured for national income reporting perspectives, but that isn't going to help here
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/11/15/nevada-false-electors-trump-investigation-00127369
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pancho_Aréna
Dyed in the wool socialists would prefer to keep their hands clean and carp about your lot remaining in power and trashing anything else they haven't yet trashed.
forget domestic concerns, what we need to get right is Rwanda...
EDIT: At least Starmer recognised we can't vote a fix for Palestine, unlike Richi
Anyway, the votes are meaningless, and those voting for a ceasefire are not acting in some deeply unprincipled way on the whole. There are no good options in Israel/Gaza, and those voting for a ceasefire are not SFAICS saying that Hamas is all good and IDF all bad.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill
And his proposal was laughed out of the chamber.
🌹 Lab 46% (+2)
🌳 Con 19% (-4)
🔶 Lib Dem 9% (-1)
➡️ Reform 10% (+2)
🌍 Greens 8% (+1)
🎗️ SNP 5% (+1)
There’s not a single grown-up among them, is there? It’s government by the smallest, pettiest, thickest individuals our country has had the misfortune to produce.
27pt Labour lead
🌹 Lab 46% (+2)
🌳 Con 19% (-4)
🔶 Lib Dem 9% (-1)
➡️ Reform 10% (+2)
🌍 Greens 8% (+1)
🎗️ SNP 5% (+1)
Via @FindoutnowUK
2,198 GB adults, 13-14 Nov
https://creation.com/does-the-bible-say-pi-equals-3
@HXValley
"The beaches are open, everyone is having a wonderful time, and the town council has just passed a motion barring ANY Great Whites from within 3 miles of the coast."
Largely swallowed up by the Rwanda news and Suella - it's not had/going to have the days of psychodrama in the press that it might have had in a slow news week.
A rebellion of 58 is pretty large - but Blair, with an admittedly larger PLP faced similar sized ones in his first term over Welfare Reform. And this is an emotive issue where voting for the nice sounding performative thing has virtually no consequences. Even those who've resigned will be back soon enough if Starmer and his team rate them. Only so much arm twisting or bribing sceptical MPs whips could do, or would be prepared to.
Plus, as much as the left are enjoying bashing Starmer because they think they've found an issue which recaptures Corbynism's essence, they might be overplaying their hand. It was notable that even some who are pretty right on with all that expressed disgust at Corbyn's ludicrous appearance on Piers Morgan.
OK, I might have been wrong. My assumption was that any move Rishi made from his perfectly calibrated equilibrium would lose roughly as many votes on one side as it gained on the other.
I didn't allow for the possibility that he would manage to annoy both ends of his coalition at the same time.
(See Rwanda, where Rishi looks set to piss off the centrists by continuing to talk about the madness and the right by failing to deport anyone.)
Keir Starmer: "I regret that some colleagues felt unable to support the position tonight. But I wanted to be clear about where I stood, and where I will stand. Leadership is about doing the right thing. That is the least the public deserves. And the least that leadership demands.
I mean: Lord David Cameron. FFS
On the same day you sack a totemic figure of the right, guaranteeing civil war in the party
Two more polls like this and he’s in deep shit. Because, the Tories have nothing to lose. They are facing actual extinction. Under 50 seats
Kick out Sunak put a proper right winger in and go down fighting with, at least, some honour
Arguing for humanitarian pauses is realistically the best one can hope for.
If it didn't happen over this, there would be something else. And if that failed, she'd quit, claiming that she had been stymied in all her attempts to limit immigration by Number 10.
The Labour lead is less important at this point than the Tory lead over Reform / Lib Dems on either flank.
It isn't. A huge responsibility rests on the top tier of centrist Labour MPs to provide a party capable of modestly decent government.
Events of this week (what do you mean, it's only Wednesday?) have left Sunak in a worse position than he was in on Monday.
But sacking Suella was still the right, necessary thing to do- partly because of her likely response to today's news, but also because she has got to the "child who wants to be expelled/employee who want to be sacked" stage, and that always ends badly.
But also, Sunak doesn't seem to have the courage of his convictions, whatever they are. Centre rightist (bringing back Dave, saying 'oh well never mind' about Rwanda) would work. So would doubling down on 2016 populism.
Whatever the f&@k he's trying to do (I'm reminded of the Moleswoeth 'you boys may think I'm soft, but I'm hard... Dashed hard' cartoon) is somehow the worst of both worlds.
This can't last another year, can it?
Good news is you've got a 27pp poll lead. Bad news is some old fart on PB.com isn't prepared to shell out a fiver from his pension.
So I'll prepare your tearful resignation speech, shall I?
Earlier one might have argued that it was a great opportunity for Starmer to push out the last of the Momentum crew by forcing them to take a stand commensurate with their obsession with Palestinian politics to the exclusion of actual UK politics, but after weeks of bombing we’re far beyond that point now & it’s only going to get worse from here on in as the deaths on the ground continue to mount.
Also: let her own the Rwanda decision and let her try and fix it. Instead he sacked her three days BEFORE the judgment so she looks completely vindicated and he gets all the shit
He’s dragged the Tories to the edge of a mighty cliff. He’s really really bad at politics. Appoint Cameron, sack Braverman? Genius, not
Anyway I'm more concerned by SNP back at 5%, that should be more worrying for Keir as well - at this rate he would win anyway, but his job will be much easier if he can gain back loads in Scotland.
I am appalled by the indiscipline of the labour rebels. They stand on the brink of actually being able to do something for the first time in 13 years and they throw their toys out of the pram over words. Idiots.
Giving Rishi a twirling wedgie during the King's Speech?
Proposing the abolition the Royal Family because they're all bloody Germans?
Because she had got to the point that she was prepared to do whatever it took to be sacked. There's no good way of managing people like that.
At the moment he's in the worst of all worlds, as liberal centre right and right voters see the noisy (un)populism, and the noisy populists see a failed establishment full of hot air.
That would stop Cameron annoying the Remainers by his mere continued existence, and also win back the right wing votes he is losing to Reform. Could be a game changer
Labour 528 seats
Tories 47
Lib Dems 35
SNP 19
And on that result Rishi would be losing his seat so would be straight off to California..
She was also absolutely right on a series of crucial issues and - more importantly - was apparently the only Tory politician with the balls to say this stuff out loud. She was - as I say - totemic
So he sacked her. It is beyond pathetic
(Note: I can't put SNP % in without doing a full Scottish prediction, so it's defaulted to 4%)
She got sacked for being shit at her job.